Slashdot Mirror


Congressman Calls For Probe Into Trump's Unsecured Android Phone (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNET: President Donald Trump regularly makes news because of his tweets. Now a congressman is making news because of the device the president reportedly uses to tweet. On Friday, Congressman Ted Lieu, a Democrat from Los Angeles, wrote a letter to the House Oversight Committee requesting an investigation into Trump's cybersecurity practices. In particular, he calls out Trump's apparent decision to keep using his personal Android phone instead of a secured phone the Secret Service issued him for his inauguration. The letter is also signed by 14 other members of Congress and calls for a public hearing to discuss the issues. "The device President Trump insists on using -- most likely the Samsung Galaxy S3 -- has particularly well documented vulnerabilities," the letter says. "The use of an unsecured phone risks the president of the United States being monitored by foreign or domestic adversaries, many of whom would be happy to hijack the president's prized Twitter account causing disastrous consequences for global security. Cybersecurity experts universally agree that an ordinary Android smartphone, which the president is reportedly using despite repeated warnings from the Secret Service, can be easily hacked."

15 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. How could you tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our president's postings are so bizarre.

  2. Re:too late by craigminah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Elections have consequences" -- Obama

  3. Re:Just another mindless attack by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He has tweeted at a time he was scheduled to be in a Top Secret meeting. Either he's not attending his meetings, or he's tweeting during them. Either is gross negligence, so which gross negligence is it today?

  4. Be careful what you ask for.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As democracy is perfected, the office of the president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people.
    On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House
    will be occupied by a downright fool and a complete narcissistic moron.

    ~H.L. Mencken

  5. Re:If his phone can easily be hacked, by Falconhell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, the Russians have hacked it, at least its secure from everyone but them.

  6. Re:He can just wipe it with a towel by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Along these lines, I think that Trump should be investigated over this at least nine times.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  7. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's funny how everything that his supporters claimed Clinton was doing, the unsecured phones, the pay-for-access, the cronyism, the corruption, is all stuff that we have absolute proof Turmp is doing barely a month into his presidency.

    The guy is so brazen about it, he doesn't even bother to cover it up at least try to avoid doing the exact same thing he was criticising her for months earlier.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. Re:It Just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It DOES matter. A hacked phone allows the hacker to access everything in the phone, like the camera, the microphone, the GPS. Trump is known to be using an out of date, hackable phone for his Twitter nonesense. Nevermind that Twitter-time should be over... you won, damn-it, now get on with doing the job instead of bitching about Hillary, who likely has already gotten rip-roaring drunk, yelled, screamed, ranted, fallen down, puked all over Bill and herself, slept it off for about a week, and moved on. Trump's still chasing invisible enemies with his Tweet phone. He needs to get down to the incredibly boring, tedious business of keeping the machinery of the country running smoothly and reliably. Instead, he's Tweeting on an old Android phone like he's still running for office, signing orders as vague as campaign slogans, and people charged with getting the job done don't know what the fuck. And all the time, Putin's listening and watching through his unsecure Tweet phone? Four years of this shit! Pray to Christ he doesn't start a war just so he can blame someone and throw all the mean people calling him names into camps!

  9. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by flopsquad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's funny that all of this stuff wasn't a big deal to you hyper-partisans when Clinton was accused of them, but they suddenly are a big deal when Trump is doing them.

    Your rah-rah-my-team bullshit is fucking up our world. It's a big deal when both teams do it. (And I'm calling you out, Ami, because you were defending Clinton for these very same things.)

    It's perfectly valid to point out and criticize hypocracy, regardless of whether one personally agrees or disagrees with the underlying position.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  10. Re: I got a probe for ya.... by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, according to his own words, he should be locked up in prison.

  11. Re:If his phone can easily be hacked, by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's still a problem with GPS tracking and remote activation of microphone and camera.

  12. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "absolute proof"? Lol, you loonies are hilariously deluded.

    Project Veritas provides proof, ON VIDEO, of election rigging in the DNC and the leftists can't refute it so they just claim its faked even though they can't provide any proof of it being so. Yet, some vague rumor about what Trump is doing comes up, and all of a sudden it's "absolute proof".

    Why would I believe a serial liar like OKeefe who keeps getting caught again and again and again fabricating evidence for his shitty witchhunts, when multiple enquiries by people who are actually domain experts have said that no, there is just no evidence at all of it.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  13. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by flopsquad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hypocracy

    I see what you did there.

    Hasn't made it into the dictionary so far, but I can't think of another word for "Government by all the evil things you denounced to get you there in the first place."

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  14. Re:Go visit Mar-a-Lago and complain by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Why would I believe

    Because when the PV videos on staging violence came out, we found evidence that Zulema Rodriguez was employed by MoveOn to be in Arizona, we have a video of her blocking the road and lying to cops, and that corroborates the video?

    Your original source is a video by a guy who is famous for dishonestly editing videos... and yet you keep going back to him as a primary source.

    I have absolutely zero confidence that you know how to determine if a piece of evidence is true or relevant.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  15. Re:too late by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    after 8 years of Obama we have more racial tension than ever before

    No, we don't. All of that racial tension you're seeing was already there. What happened was that having a black president encouraged black Americans to speak up about the ways in which they're systematically oppressed, which means that you are now more aware of the existing racial tension.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.