Slashdot Mirror


Krebs: 'Men Who Sent SWAT Team, Heroin to My Home Sentenced' (krebsonsecurity.com)

An anonymous reader quotes KrebsOnSecurity: On Thursday, a Ukrainian man who hatched a plan in 2013 to send heroin to my home and then call the cops when the drugs arrived was sentenced to 41 months in prison for unrelated cybercrime charges. Separately, a 19-year-old American who admitted to being part of a hacker group that sent a heavily-armed police force to my home in 2013 was sentenced to three years probation.

Sergey Vovnenko, a.k.a. "Fly," "Flycracker" and "MUXACC1," pleaded guilty last year to aggravated identity theft and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Prosecutors said Vovnenko operated a network of more than 13,000 hacked computers, using them to harvest credit card numbers and other sensitive information... A judge in New Jersey sentenced Vovnenko to 41 months in prison, three years of supervised released and ordered him to pay restitution of $83,368.

Separately, a judge in Washington, D.C. handed down a sentence of three year's probation to Eric Taylor, a hacker probably better known by his handle "Cosmo the God." Taylor was among several men involved in making a false report to my local police department at the time about a supposed hostage situation at our Virginia home. In response, a heavily-armed police force surrounded my home and put me in handcuffs at gunpoint before the police realized it was all a dangerous hoax known as "swatting"... Taylor and his co-conspirators were able to dox so many celebrities and public officials because they hacked a Russian identity theft service called ssndob[dot]ru. That service in turn relied upon compromised user accounts at data broker giant LexisNexis to pull personal and financial data on millions of Americans.

17 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. 3 years probation by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For what is essentially attempted murder?

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:3 years probation by Comboman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, it's not his fault that American police forces have become an over-armed, under-trained occupying army ready to rain down deadly violence with few checks and balances.

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    2. Re: 3 years probation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that American police break down doors in far too many instances when they shouldn't, but you need to quit being so dramatic. They got a credible report of a hostage situation - they SHOULD roll up armed. And despite the press amplification of every single case (if the racial makeup is correct) the odds of an unarmed person getting shot by police are extremely low.

    3. Re:3 years probation by clovis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It looks to me like Eric Taylor's sentence wasn't for the swatting incident, and it was a plea bargain.
      http://www.washingtontimes.com...

      From the linked article:

      A teenager hacker was sentenced in D.C. federal court Wednesday for a slew of cybercrimes committed against President Trump, Michelle Obama and former CIA Director John Brennan, among others.

      Mr. Taylor and multiple co-conspirators are accused by the government of illegally obtaining personal information from high-profile victims and publishing it on a website, Exposed.Su, in 2013. He pleaded guilty last year to related charges and was sentenced at 2 p.m. Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington, D.C., The Times has learned.

      Allegations against Mr. Taylor and others charged in the conspiracy were filed under seal, and Wednesday’s sentencing hearing was not listed on the court’s website. Details of the sentencing were confirmed to The Times by individuals familiar with the case but not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.

      Because everything is sealed, I suspect that the defense attorney's threatened to use the trial to dump into the public record everything that Eric et al had stolen, and that would be harmful to the high-profile people they hacked. Hence the light sentence and plea bargain.

    4. Re: 3 years probation by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah,so well handled that a barking dog could have gotten them all killed

    5. Re: 3 years probation by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So how many "odds" does it take for a man laying face down, compliant with police, in a public arena, with a knee on his neck, to get shot through the heart and his murderer to walk away with 2 years?
      1

    6. Re: 3 years probation by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree that American police break down doors in far too many instances when they shouldn't, but you need to quit being so dramatic. They got a credible report of a hostage situation - they SHOULD roll up armed

      The correct response to a reported hostage situation is absolutely not to have a bunch of over-armed thugs in mall-ninja gear kick down the door. The correct response is a negotiator, a sniper, some normal cops in vests, and patience. You know, how SWAT teams worked before the cops starting playing soldier.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re: 3 years probation by Cederic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While the police reaction was justified, the situation so often turns to the "wrong" target dead

      You appear to have contradicted yourself.

  2. SWATing needs serious consequences by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The US needs to force phone companies to update the ancient VOIP protocols with some kind of security certificate/trust system to eliminate spoofed phone numbers and crack down on SWATing. In an act where Krebs or one of his family members could have been killed, this kind of behavior needs to be treated like attempted murder, not some prank. Even under the best of circumstances, the family pet is often killed by the SWAT team to avoid injury.

    With a security cert system, the phone network would refuse to route any calls without a valid certificate, and valid certificates could be traced back to a credit card/drivers license/IP address all tied to that certificate number, as well as a physical device and it's actual IP. I am sure there are still ways to circumvent it, but it would be a good starting point, and would catch most of the script kiddies, which is where 90% of this SWATing comes from.

    Fly by night shady companies that refuse to collect this information or programs of the same nature simply wouldn't be able to place calls at all. For the same reason that it should be illegal to protest with a mask concealing your face, it should be illegal to obscure/spoof your identity through the phone system, and attempting to do so in and of it'self should be a federal crime with heavy penalties (I am looking at you telemarketers).

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:SWATing needs serious consequences by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good points but this wasn't spoofing a number but rather using the TTY service setup for deaf people to make the call. Scammers use them as well because they are required by law to transcribe verbatim dialogue. They may also be prevented from identifying themselves as an intermediary.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re: SWATing needs serious consequences by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why should it be illegal to hide your face during a protest?

    3. Re:SWATing needs serious consequences by XparXnoiaX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anonymity was crucial to the founding of our democracy, and people should be allowed to protest without being recognized. Giving the government a huge new surveillance tool is not the right answer to stopping swatting.

      --
      Irresponsible disclosure is responsible
    4. Re:SWATing needs serious consequences by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice idea but it seems like it wouldn't work with a lot of services. You can sign up for various VOIP accounts for free and they obliged to provide emergency service for safety. IP addresses are easily masked. Even credit cards are easily bought for a few Bitcoins and someone can always use a payphone.

      A better, simpler solution would be to not send in armed police, fingers on triggers because of a single phone call.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re: SWATing needs serious consequences by jeff4747 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, imagine doing something like dressing up as a Native American and looting a ship in a harbor....

  3. Too lenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who are charged with uploading songs, movies, and academic journals to the internet (with no financial gain to themselves) are threatened with decades of prison time and absurd financial penalties. These people deceive SWAT teams and recklessly endanger lives and get probation? Misplaced priorities, folks. The so-called swatters should receive more severe penalties, in my opinion.

  4. Reckless endangerment by raymorris · · Score: 5, Informative

    The offender wasn't *trying* to kill Krebs. So not attempted murder.

      Krebs didn't die, so not manslaughter.

    The offender did act in a way to create a dangerous situation with no regard for the fact that Krebs, other people in his home, or police officers could be seriously injured. That neatly matches the definition of "reckless endangerment".

    Had someone actually died, it would match the definition of "depraved-heart murder", which is second-degree homicide in many states. Depraved-heart murder is killing someone through actions not actually *intended* to kill them, but by reckless disregard for their safety.

  5. Re:The real problem by Procrasti · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every single one of the problems you cite about drugs is due to their prohibition, or at the very least exacerbated by it.

    Exactly the same things happened during alcohol prohibition, but for some reason you people are too stupid to see the correlation and instead continue to think that doing more and harder of the same will get you different results.