Slashdot Mirror


Americans at Risk of Identity Theft as They File their Tax Returns (betanews.com)

Ian Barker, writing for BetaNews: As we move into the tax return season a new study reveals that attitudes to identity theft and a pattern of poor practices are leaving much of the public vulnerable. Data security and ID theft protection company CyberScout has carried out its second annual Tax Season Risk Report and finds 58 percent of Americans are not worried about tax fraud in spite of federal reports of 787,000 confirmed identity theft returns in 2016, totaling more than $4 billion in potential fraud. Among other findings are that only 35 percent of taxpayers demand that their preparers use two-factor authentication to protect their clients' personal information. Less than a fifth (18 percent) use an encrypted USB drive to save important documents like tax worksheets, W-2s, 1099s or 1040s. And another 38 percent either store tax documents on their computer's hard drive or in the cloud, approaches that are susceptible to a variety of hacks.

77 comments

  1. Top problem: No direct upload to IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest problem is that your tax return goes through 3rd parties like Quicken, H&R Block, etc. If there were a direct upload to the IRS, I'd use it, but even Free File is run by 3rd parties. So I use a non-Adobe-Acrobat PDF editor to fill out the tax forms & mail them. In 2013, the USPS lost both my federal & state forms even though I used certified mail... I eventually had to submit duplicates, the tax forms were never found.

    1. Re:Top problem: No direct upload to IRS by Malizar · · Score: 2

      I prepare taxes for a living, and I can assure you that my client's data is as secure as data can be made. However once the data is sent to the IRS all bets are off. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ir...

    2. Re:Top problem: No direct upload to IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malizar you sent my taxes to the neighbors. AGAIN. This is the third time now, I can't trust you to do my taxes anymore.

    3. Re:Top problem: No direct upload to IRS by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

      a statement like "I can assure you that my client's data is as secure as data can be made" would be a big red flag to me.

      --
      Nullius in verba
  2. So what are we to do? by ugen · · Score: 2

    "And another 38 percent either store tax documents on their computer's hard drive or in the cloud, approaches that are susceptible to a variety of hacks." - really? So, other than a local storage ("hard drive") or remote storage ("cloud"), what other approaches are there to storing documents that are not susceptible to any hacks? Paper printouts? :) This article is brought to you by association of paper manufacturers.

    Encrypt your hard drive, choose good passwords for your cloud storage and don't share them with others. Your data is at most risk at your doctors office, btw (where they have all of your personal information, along with SSN and family records). I had 2 notifications of personal information theft from doctor's billing processor's offices in the last 2 years.

    1. Re:So what are we to do? by imidan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so my taxes, including all relevant forms sent to me and a PDF of my final return, are stored on my primary computer's hard drive. In order to steal them, someone has to come to my house and steal my computer. And probably everything else of value that I own. And most burglars probably aren't that interested in income tax fraud schemes. They're making their money hocking my TV, not committing secondary white-collar crimes.

    2. Re:So what are we to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stored on my primary computer's hard drive. In order to steal them, someone has to come to my house and steal my computer.

      All someone has to do is gain remote access to your computer and they have access to your documents. Could happen through a Javascript exploit. Yikes!

    3. Re:So what are we to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few documents stored on cuneiform tables have been compromised by identity thieves.

    4. Re:So what are we to do? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      stored on my primary computer's hard drive. In order to steal them, someone has to come to my house and steal my computer.

      All someone has to do is gain remote access to your computer and they have access to your documents. Could happen through a Javascript exploit. Yikes!

      No kidding. You'd think someone posting on a site like slashdot would be more familiar with technology than to assume that the only way to steal documents on a hard drive is to physically steal the computer...

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    5. Re:So what are we to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha you had to eat your words jealous cbiltcliffe. How did it taste eating your words here https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10281181&cid=53915355/ ? Did it taste like your foot in your mouth ramming them back down your throat?? You should really change your diet. Eating your words isn't good nutrition and you'll hopefully die of starvation! I see you tried hiding this too https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10281159&cid=53915417/ with sockpuppet downmods punks like you use. How can you live with yourself weasel? Do you think you fool anybody other than your own deluded brain self?

  3. Re:Thankful to the Donald we don't have to file by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I guess you were just deported?

  4. scare mongering getting old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All these individual security tactics are NOT where the problem lies. You can encrypt your drives, use TFA, and shred all the paper. But thieves steal the enitire DB at Intuit or irs.gov. American attitudes are properly aligned. We don't control the databases where most theft occurs.

    1. Re:scare mongering getting old by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All these individual security tactics are NOT where the problem lies. ... But thieves steal the enitire DB at Intuit or irs.gov.

      You are correct that "individual security" is not the problem, but DBs are not the problem either. The real problem is the idiotic notion that SSNs can be both widely known and secret. I am required to provide my SSN to my employer, my bank, my doctor, my state government, etc. Yet mere knowledge of that number is supposed to authenticate my identity? That makes no sense.

    2. Re:scare mongering getting old by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That's one of my peeves. The SSN is fine as an ID. It is NOT fine as a password, and those people who treat it as such are idiots.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:scare mongering getting old by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Informative

      Another problem are credit companies who treat identity theft with a shrug and a "that's your problem." Someone obtained my name, SSN, DOB, and address. How, I'll never know. They opened a Capital One credit card in my name. The fact that the mother's maiden name was wrong on the form wasn't a red flag. Neither was the immediate address change to another state. Nor was "my wife" calling to request a $5,000 cash advance before the card was activated.

      When the card arrived at my house (a lucky quirk of them paying for rush delivery and THEN changing the address), I called CapitalOne. First, they insisted that it couldn't have been fraud, asking if my wife opened it without my knowledge. (She was next to me, freaking out about the situation. That'd be a no.) Then, they admitted that it might be fraud, closed the card out, but refused to give me more information. They literally told me "If we give you the address on the account and you go there and shoot them, we'd be liable." Apparently, they didn't think anything about liability if they opened an account under my name, ignoring a lot of red flags. They even stone-walled the police - telling them to call one phone number that was "manned" by an answering machine whose messages were never returned.

      Eventually, I gave up on trying to push the investigation forward and just froze my credit. For all I know, the thieves who stole my identity are still out there racking up debt on other people's credit.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:scare mongering getting old by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The SSN is fine as an ID.

      Actually, it is not. SSNs are not unique. Many people share SSNs with other people that they have never met, and may not even be aware of. What is unique is the SSN+DOB combination. That is why any government form that asks for your SSN, will also ask for your DOB.

    5. Re:scare mongering getting old by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is not. SSNs are not unique. Many people share SSNs with other people that they have never met, and may not even be aware of. What is unique is the SSN+DOB combination. That is why any government form that asks for your SSN, will also ask for your DOB.

      Citation needed. The SSA does not re-issue numbers. So far, it has issued 450 million out of about 1 billion numbers, but it hasn't issued any duplicates (although some people have been issued more than one). There were some news reports a while ago about a company that did analysis on databases they had access to and found that some numbers were associated with more than one name, but those were just examples of identity theft or clerical errors. Of course, the media immediately trumpeted "ZOMG other people share your SSN!" and did the usual scaremongering. Is that what you were remembering?

      --

      Enigma

    6. Re:scare mongering getting old by gtall · · Score: 1

      I froze my credit records at the three big credit agencies a few years back. Just for anyone's info, you go to their sites and route around until you find out which stupid pet tricks they make you perform to do it. If I recall, two were relatively easy, one was a royal pain in the tookus to find out how. Each charges between $10-$15...back then, dunno what it is now.

      If you need credit, you can get them unlocked for a period of time before the lock goes back on. I think it varies between 30-45 days. And of course you get to pay those weasels $5-10 to unlock your own information. I take that back, weasels are honorable, they are no weasels.

    7. Re:scare mongering getting old by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

      Citation
      Citation
      Citation

    8. Re:scare mongering getting old by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reality is "Identity Theft" is a purposeful lie produced by public relations and marketing agencies to push the burden of the crime from the banks to individuals. It is a lie. The reality is the fraud is not against the individual the fraud is against those who accept that false identity. Why the shift, so you the ignorant mug punters get stuck with the loss and the banks wander off laughing.

      The truth is, when you get hit by a false claim, you are entitled to seek the prosecution of those who attempted to make that false claim. By any reasoned justice those who made the false claim against you must now prove they were defrauded by another party, else be charged with fraud themselves. It should never ever be up to you to prove anything, you should just be able to forward a complaint of false fiscal claims against you as fraud to the authorities and let them deal with it.

      Of course the banks would end up with the bill, hence the scam of identity theft, where you the innocent party and now liable for the corrupt stupidity of the banks until you can prove your innocence, can you not see the criminal corruption in that.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:scare mongering getting old by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen for them. "Accessory to a crime" or something.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:scare mongering getting old by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      NONE of those show that the SSA reissues SSNs. The first is the Wikipedia page saying so, the second is a story about two women accidentally given the same number at birth because they share a lot of details in common, and the third is a story about numbers being used by multiple people due to fraud, mistakes, or other problems.

      The SSA does not re-issue numbers.

    11. Re:scare mongering getting old by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you want me to look at on the Wikipedia article was it this?
      However, there have been instances where multiple individuals have been inadvertently assigned the same Social Security number

      The reference actually only mentions a single instance of this happening, not multiple as the Wikipedia article says. Yes, that was a case of two people being assigned the same number. However, they also had the same name and same birthday, so your assertion that the federal government uses a combination of SSN and birthdate wouldn't do anything in that instance.

      The second and third citation you provided are just the hysterical news stories brought on by the ID Analytics (LifeLock) study that I already mentioned. That study found nothing about people being issued duplicate numbers or that SSNs are not unique. None of the citations show any support for what you said:

      SSNs are not unique. Many people share SSNs with other people that they have never met, and may not even be aware of. What is unique is the SSN+DOB combination. That is why any government form that asks for your SSN, will also ask for your DOB.

      You've shown that there is at least one instance where two people were issued the same number (which was fixed), but shown no evidence that SSNs are not unique or that the purpose of the government asking for your DOB is that they use a DOB+SSN combination. The government doesn't (knowingly) issue the same number to multiple people. You claim "many people share SSNs" but that's not the case. That's like saying "many people share credit card numbers" because sometimes people use other people's credit card numbers for fraud. It's just not accurate.

      --

      Enigma

    12. Re:scare mongering getting old by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      NONE of those show that the SSA reissues SSNs

      Nobody said they did. I said they were NOT UNIQUE. They aren't.

    13. Re:scare mongering getting old by Bourdain · · Score: 1

      People should consider asking for an IP PIN to help prevent an additional vector of identity theft

      https://www.irs.gov/individual...

      by signing up at the above (well in advance of the return due date, it's likely too late to ask for one for your 2016 return), it essentially functions as a password for your return

    14. Re:scare mongering getting old by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The problem with freezing your credit is that as of a couple years ago the credit agencies used that lame personal background service to confirm your identity. You know, the one where your bank asks you what high school you went to, which bank you took out a car loan with, what city you were born in, etc. and gives you multiple choice answers. The identity thief usually has the answers to all these questions, or can make a good guess which of the multiple choice answers is correct - they stole your identity after all.

      Yes the credit freeze is supposed to be protected by a PIN or password. The thief just calls the credit agency posing as you, and says that they forgot the PIN or password. Then the credit agency asks those lame questions, the thief gets three right, and they lift the credit freeze. (If they're real jerks, they'll change the PIN or password so you can't freeze it again.

      Some banks have dumped these canned questions, and are now allowing you yourself to make up questions and answers they'll ask if you say you forgot your PIN or password. I don't know if the credit agencies have switched to this type of question system in the last couple years.

    15. Re:scare mongering getting old by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Put the liability for improper identity verification on the financial institutions and watch the problem get fixed real fast.

      I know it's not done because of cost, but identity verification really should be done in-person. You verify their government issued documents, maybe confirm some biometrics and if someone is trying to commit fraud you have them right there for the police to apprehend.

    16. Re:scare mongering getting old by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      We froze both of our credit files after the identity theft. It's useful when stores try to pressure you to "save 5% now if you just sign up for our card." Nope. No can do. My credit's frozen due to identity theft. That shuts them up real quick. On the down side, though, we gave up on refinancing our mortgage a couple of years ago even though we could have saved money. It was too much of a headache to thaw our credit, get the mortgage quotes, and try to get everything signed before the freeze took effect again.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  5. I suspect by fredrated · · Score: 2

    they can't hack the paper forms I mail in.

    1. Re:I suspect by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they can't hack the paper forms I mail in.

      They can as soon as the forms are scanned, and your info is inserted into the same DB as everyone else.

    2. Re:I suspect by tsqr · · Score: 1

      they can't hack the paper forms I mail in.

      Right. Because no one with access to your mail would ever possibly read it.

    3. Re:I suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the identity is government property, stop using government property, its not yours.

    4. Re:I suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out that they can...
      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/irs-scam-identity-tax-refund-fraud-60-minutes/

  6. A filing cabinet and a calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My tax information never touches a computer if I can help it.

  7. Questionable security advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only 35 percent of taxpayers demand that their preparers use two-factor authentication to protect their clients' personal information. Less than a fifth (18 percent) use an encrypted USB drive to save important documents like tax worksheets, W-2s, 1099s or 1040s. And another 38 percent either store tax documents on their computer's hard drive

    This article's security advice is very questionable. What's wrong with storing sensitive data on a hard drive? Why should an encrypted USB drive be used? Is there something wrong with paper documents or even unencrypted USB drives? And why is two-factor authentication considered necessary? Two-factor authentication is only one of many different strategies for ensuring security.

    Worse yet, the article doesn't even mention last year's fiasco with the IRS e-filing PINs.

  8. no one wants to be us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ordinarians, unchosen for sure... hand in hand we stand..

  9. Mathtime by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    787000/330000000 = less than a 1:500 chance. This just in: Site that wants to sell you peace of mind is trying to frighten you into thinking you need peace of mind.

    1. Re:Mathtime by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      787000/330000000 = less than a 1:500 chance.

      Most households only file one return. Last year there were about 140M returns filed. So the chance is actually about 1:150 ... and those are only the confirmed cases.

    2. Re:Mathtime by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

  10. Income? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What income?

  11. IRS PIN by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Some years ago I filed for unemployment benefits and discovered that a C RAMOS had used my Social Security number to work under. Notified EDD and IRS. EDD removed C RAMOS contributions for a smaller but honest weekly unemployment benefit. The IRS sent me a PIN to use with my tax return. Without the PIN, I can't file. No one else can either. I've been filing every federal tax return with a PIN.

  12. Re:Thankful to the Donald we don't have to file by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    Nah, I am an undocumented tax payer.

  13. Paper tax return by PPH · · Score: 1

    Not just because it's much less likely to be hacked. I just want the IRS to feel some pain trying to read my chicken-scratch handwriting to make up for what I feel when handing them my money.

    IRS motto: We've got what it takes to take what you've got.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Paper tax return by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      So you make it harder for yourself... in order to put more burden on an agency that's funded by YOUR tax dollars. WTF kind of immature logic is that?

    2. Re:Paper tax return by PPH · · Score: 1

      So you make it harder for yourself

      It's not really harder to fill out the forms by hand. And its an issue of the vulnerability of electronic filing that I am concerned with. Somebody has to key in the figures, so it might as well be done by the IRS rather than me. What makes life easier for them also makes it easier for the scammers.

      We have to stop thinking of ourselves as being subservient to our bureaucratic overlords.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Re:Thankful to the Donald we don't have to file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They kicked his dog.

  15. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not an issue for Greeks and major companies.

    1. Re:Meh by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

      Not an issue for Greeks and major companies.

      True, I think the ancient Greeks will not be affected by this. However, lot's of Seagate employees (and employees of other major companies) will disagree with you.

  16. shared knowledge by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    The IRS already know everything I send to them. The only reason they have me write it up and send it in again is to generate coprorate welfare for the tax prep industry. They could make a lot of this go away by simply sending me a summary and if I agree with it no further action is necessary and no further confidential uploads to the IRS are needed.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:shared knowledge by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      Objectively, yes. It's not corporate welfare for tax prep though. Tax Preparers are like any worker, there's a group of people who say they don't want to do their own taxes and there's a group of people saying 'i'll do that for money' ... simple supply/demand. Of course, these are also the people (especially in small business tax firms, like your local CPA) that help people hide/budget/invest their money, so there's also that service level to consider. Taxes are just one example of a government sponsored industry that would clearly benefit from automation but I genuinely feel that most people are scared to automate taxes for fear of actually paying them.

    2. Re:shared knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS does NOT know everything, that's a misconception. They know what is reported to them. In your case, probably your income and major expenses.

      But there are millions of people for whom the system you describe would result in unmitigated fraud and lost government revenue, especially when it relates to business deals, stocks, investments, all kinds of things. If they had a team of people investigating you constantly and all international transactions were recorded and categorized and logged in your file ahead of time, sure, that would be easier for you. But more secure? Less abused? Hard to say.

    3. Re:shared knowledge by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Many people in the UK don't do a tax return and their tax is exactly correct at the end of the year.

      This is accomplished in several ways: 1. Just like the USA, employers and other entities send data to HMRC. 2. Many allowances are limited to basic rate tax, so the amount of the allowance doesn't change based on income. 3. Interest and dividends are taxed at source. and probably the most significant difference: 4. Employers calculate tax to be deducted on a rolling basis (taking account of prior income and taxes already deducted), not as individual months. 5. Instead of a W4 which employees complete, HMRC sends the employer a tax code, which is used to calculate tax deductions, based on the employees actual circumstances.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:shared knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah if you file a 1040EZ. If you had significant deductions, business profit/loss, traded securities, owned rental properties, got married/divorced and/or had children, lost a job, found a job, moved, sold your house, received money from a friend/relative, or had gambling winnings - then no the IRS does not know all that.

    5. Re:shared knowledge by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Then congress should quit trying to do their social engineering through the tax code and remove all those deductions, the only thing I can see there that would require any input from the taxpayer is "received money from a friend/relative" and I'll guarantee 99% of such transactions go unreported anyway. If congress wants to encourage having children, or home ownership, or having solar panels, or being a blind railroad worker, let them make a direct appropriation and send checks to the people who they decide instead of lumping everything into the tax code. Of course, they don't want to do this as their handouts to their cronies will be more apparent.

      --

      Enigma

  17. old guy here by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I still file mine hardcopy in the mail since the 20th century. So no worries of internet hacking.

    Actually one concern is throughout the years there have been staff cuts at IRS, and probably more soon. A friend who has a accounting/taxes business says Fresno office used to have a couple auditors that were good to work with (yes, not all tax audits are perilous, occasionally they want to review certain returns). So maybe filing hardcopy might soon be a thing of the past as less competent people to deal with returns.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  18. Re:Thankful to the Donald we don't have to file by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not paying your taxes makes you smart!*

    * Only applies to billionaires. Attempts to apply this to someone in the middle class may result in jail time.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  19. Fraudulent 1040 filed for me last year by Poisonous+Drool · · Score: 2

    On March 30, 2016 someone filed a fraudulent return with a refund going to a debit card. I found out when the IRS returned a payment. It's been a big headache with lots of paperwork. Only one of the credit bureaus accepted my paperwork to freeze my credit. The others gave bogus reasons for rejecting my application. My bank couldn't handle a auto loan. My suggestion: file your taxes early before the criminals can.

    1. Re:Fraudulent 1040 filed for me last year by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      It blows me away that the IRS will just mail a pre-paid card out for someone's tax return, from what I understand it doesn't even have to be sent to the address on file for the taxpayer. At least with a check or an electronic deposit there's a paper trail.

  20. Steal my Return! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for someone stealing my return this year. I owe the IRS money so if someone wants to jack my negative refund, I can live with that.

  21. I already filed, by waspleg · · Score: 1

    but if I hadn't, they'd have been welcome to pay what I owed.

    1. Re:I already filed, by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      but if I hadn't, they'd have been welcome to pay what I owed.

      I'm pretty sure the criminals filing false returns are also using false data so they can get a false refund.

  22. Another Paperwork Filer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a paperwork filer, I have never had my taxes spoofed. However, I found out the hard way that my city taxes go to my state for processing. The State contracts with a private company to save money. In the process, a comedy of errors can occur.

    When I received a notice in October that I had not filed my 2015 taxes, I drove to city hall. The city employee quickly popped up my scanned form in her computer, told me that this situation has occurred with many other taxpayers, and advised my to personally hand my forms to her this Spring.

  23. easily solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a 1099 contractor, I have to send a check with my return. No refund to steal, no problem.

  24. W2 Spearphishing by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing a lot of W2 spearphishing.

    From: $CEO_PERSON <$CEO_USERNAME@cornpany.com>

    To: $HR_PERSON <$HR_USERNAME@company.com>

    Hey, $HR_PERSON,

    Hope your day is going well. I need to get a copy of the W2s, addresses, etc. for all employees. Please attach it as a PDF file.

    Thanks,

    $CEO_NAME

    Note the return domain CORNPANY.com not COMPANY.com.

  25. just do the prez... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    Just file as Donald Trump. He's on the no taxes owed and no taxes paid list do you're good to go.

  26. Re: Thankful to the Donald we don't have to file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh you don't need to be a billionaire, you just need to know how to do it.

    Honestly a day's worth of research and I'm sure you could figure it out.

    Even if you don't want to jump through too many hoops, the simplest route is start a (limited liability) corporation, ask your employer to "hire" you as a "contractor," have them pay out to your corporation, you turn around and pay yourself a dividend instead of a salary. Some companies would be willing to do this, as they would no longer have to offer you insurance or other perks.

    Federal Corporate tax is now 15% in the US. If you keep track of it, you can deduct fuel and car payments, office use of home, parts of your home utilities (* this can all vary where you live. I'm from Canada and don't know much about US taxes).

    All perfectly legal. Granted things like medical insurance becomes much harder to obtain, but depending on what you save in taxes may make up for it.

    Disclaimer: I'm not an accountant. Your mileage may vary. I am not a US citizen and very naive as to how the US tax code works. I'm mostly just writing this to be funny, but also it's true, because I do all of the above except I actually run my own business and is not simply a tax dodge.

  27. Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's so risky, why haven't Trump's tax returns leaked yet?

  28. Re:Thankful to the Donald we don't have to file by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Only applies to billionaires who lose tons of money, so when they don't pay taxes, what's really happening is they're just shrinking their losses some. In the end they still lost money.

  29. Seriously? by Zemran · · Score: 1

    We are talking about a nation of people who think it is somehow wrong not put your real name on Facebook and publish all your details where everyone can easily find them. If the thief cannot find enough there they can look you up on LinkdIn. Why would anyone go anywhere else to steal someone's identity?

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  30. Re: Thankful to the Donald we don't have to file by hipp5 · · Score: 1

    ask your employer to "hire" you as a "contractor,"

    At least in Canada, CRA has some pretty strict definitions of what a contractor is. If you're basically going back to full time employment for one employer, you are not a contractor and CRA will catch that if you're ever audited./p

  31. Why am I doing this again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it we pay taxes again? When the Government Accountability Office (you know, the office responsible for auditing the government's finances) states that portions of the US federal budget are completely unauditable. There is a 6.5 trillion dollar hole in the department of defense budget. Nobody knows where that money went. Nobody is talking about it in the news. Nobody seems to really give a damn or think it's a big deal. $6.5 Trillion!!!! So if I were to decide that hey, I don't really want to contribute to this criminal bullshit anymore, somehow that makes me a criminal for "tax evasion"? Is this a fucking joke? Is it called freedom when you get put in a cage for not wanting to support irresponsible stewards of our money? After income taxes, gas taxes, sales taxes they are siphoning off nearly 50% of my labor. And if I disagree with how much they're taking and how it's being used I'm looked at like scum for not wanting to "pay my fair share" (let alone being fined or put in jail). We are nothing but resources to be extracted and used. This is just the new version of slavery. Don't be fooled by the illusion of freedom. As soon as you object to being economically raped you will be punished.

    1. Re: Why am I doing this again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same AC here. Here's a link to the GAO summery of their findings if interested http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-283R

  32. Another reason to scrap the income tax by moeinvt · · Score: 2

    Yet another good reason why we should abolish the personal and corporate income tax in favor of the fair tax The fair tax is a consumption tax, but avoids any disproportionate impact on the poor by providing a pre-paid tax credit in the amount that a poor person would pay in taxes over the course of a year.

    Everyone understands that taxation creates a disincentive for particular behavior, which is precisely why tobacco is taxed at such ridiculous levels. Why the hell do we tolerate a tax system which creates a disincentive for working and producing things?

    Eliminating the ridiculously complex, multi-thousand page income tax code also gets rid of the government's favorite and most convenient mechanism for handing out favors to wealthy special interests. It creates an incentive for businesses to invest in the U.S. & makes U.S. goods more competitive vs. imports ... and of course we would be far less vulnerable to this sort of tax fraud.