Slashdot Mirror


Disney Develops Room With 'Ubiquitous Wireless' Charging (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNET: The scientific and tech arm of the entertainment giant Disney has built a prototype room with "ubiquitous wireless power delivery" that allows several devices to be charged wirelessly in much the way we get internet access through Wi-Fi. By tapping quasistatic cavity resonance, researchers discovered they could generate magnetic fields inside specially built structures to deliver kilowatts of power to mobile devices inside that structure. "This new innovative method will make it possible for electrical power to become as ubiquitous as WiFi," Alanson Sample, associate lab director and principal research scientist at Disney Research, told Phys.org. "This in turn could enable new applications for robots and other small mobile devices by eliminating the need to replace batteries and wires for charging." All you have to do is be in the room and your device will start charging automatically. And depending on where you are in the room, delivery efficiency can be as high as 95 percent, researchers said. There is one potential issue: you have to not mind being in a room constructed mostly of aluminum, that includes the walls, ceiling and floor. There's a copper pole in the middle of the room, and 15 discrete high quality factor capacitors that separate the magnetic field from the electric field.

110 comments

  1. "...depending on where you are in the room..." by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    just sayin'.

    1. Re:"...depending on where you are in the room..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      plus we don't need to heat the room in the winter and all chocolate bars will be pre-melted for your enjoyment!

    2. Re: "...depending on where you are in the room..." by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      not bad, i cant see from the pix that anything is plugged into the wall outlet.

    3. Re:"...depending on where you are in the room..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *if* your pacemaker can survive in the room lol...

  2. I dont't want to be in an MRI scanner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just make the USB standard have a circular axis like a headphone jack!

    1. Re:I dont't want to be in an MRI scanner! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      headphone jacks are SHORTING as you insert or remove.

      horrible for power.

      (ask audio alchemy, maker of audio gear a few decades ago)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re: I dont't want to be in an MRI scanner! by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      because usb / laptop is plugged into a wall outlet for wired power.

    3. Re:I dont't want to be in an MRI scanner! by fisted · · Score: 1

      If only there was a way to design a connector that would not short yet retain a circular axis.

    4. Re:I dont't want to be in an MRI scanner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insane! You'd have to be some sort of wizard.

  3. Yes, I have the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is called industrial microwave oven.

    1. Re: Yes, I have the same thing by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      microwaves use a wall outlet ( power cord ).

    2. Re: Yes, I have the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I rather doubt they generate 1.9 KW off AA batteries....

  4. Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so I will get to charge my device this way. Very nice, my device's charger outputs 5V and 1200 mA, so it draws 6W of energy while charging.

    How much energy does this room draw from the grid, in order to provide my device - and possibly others as well in the room - the 6W it needs? If we call that number 'x', I would like to see the result y, as in y = 6/x.
    It would be the efficiency indicator I seek for such awesome new tech.

    1. Re:Efficiency? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      6W of energy

      Fail.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK pedant, what are you objecting to here? Watt is a unit of power, or you care to make a distinction between watts and volt-amps?

    3. Re: Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power is not the same as energy.

    4. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's objecting to what he quoted. you are the one who seems to be confused and not know the difference between energy and power. I guess in your world the nutritional information on the back of your snickers bar is in watts? you should try eating a lightbulb. did you know that eating 2 snickers bars gives you the power of 1 horse?

    5. Re:Efficiency? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      What does efficiency matter if it saves you from having to plug in.

      Think about it...

      You don't have to plug it in

      I don't think that you are thinking hard enough about this. Imagine never being inconvenienced to find a plug in the dark to chard you smartphone. And think of all the boxes of mismatched cables that you have. The infomercials write themselves with all the advantages. That's worth an extra $20 a year in additional power bills easily.

    6. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6W of energy

      Fail.

      Ah ladies and gents, here's another case of: "I know why you're wrong, but I won't tell you what it is. My duty is only to point out mistakes, not correct them. Otherwise I won't deserve the asshole title"

      So to fix it for your mind: Multiply the numbers by 1 (one second timespan) and the mentioned logic will hold (your assholery inclusive), as the focus of the post was in the result of the division "output over input", in which case the "time" element will cancel out as it is the same.

    7. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he quoted, though technically correct, misses the point of the entire post in general, titled "Efficiency?", dealing with a division, where units cancel out and the result is a number, usually shown in the form of a percentage. Sort of ignoring the elephant that has been shitting in the room and discussing the flies that gather around the pile of dung.

    8. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that you are thinking hard enough about the downsides of this. Kilowatts of power in the air. You won't need to use the microwave - food will be cooked just by being in this room. So will you! The ability to find power outlets will be the least of your worries.

      People today worry about radiation from cellphones & wifi - measured in milliwatts. And here Kilowatts - a million times more.

    9. Re:Efficiency? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      That was meant as sarcasm. And not just kilowatts, a hundred gigawatt hours per year if you add it all up.

  5. Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I, for one, would be wearing tin foil underpants.

    1. Re:Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh! I bet you'll get a charge out of that!

  6. microwave hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee I hope my pacemaker doesn't explode in my chest.

    Anybody ever read The Terminal Man? Anybody? Because that's the future. Luckily Michael Crichton isn't alive to witness this idiocy.

  7. I've got one of those rooms at home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My energy filled room at home is a little smaller, so I only use it for heating up burritos.

    1. Re:I've got one of those rooms at home. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      Burritos, they are examples of substances that sublimate, right?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  8. Only one word.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tesla

    1. Re:Only one word.. by Minion+of+Eris · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wasn't Nick working on this like, oh, a century plus ago? About the time he designed the generators for Niagara Falls?

      --
      Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say.
    2. Re:Only one word.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... "Nick?"

      And, what TFS describes sounds utterly useless, reminiscent of one of those airplanes with 20+ wings stacked up trying to take off.

    3. Re:Only one word.. by Minion+of+Eris · · Score: 1

      /sarcasm Yeah, back in the day me an' Nick used to rag on the ass-hat Tom Edison all the time./sarcasm Telsa, Nicola = Nick

      --
      Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say.
    4. Re:Only one word.. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was all fun and games until Eddie decided to electrocute an elephant. That was gruesome and cruel.

      But the barbecue was pretty good.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:Only one word.. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Eddie is Tommy's other nickname. That's what I get for focusing too much on trying to be funny.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    6. Re: Only one word.. by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Tessa wasn't working on it. It worked. He used a loop of wire around the room at 1000 Hz. Couple this to a device using this frequency converted to a D.C. rectifier, charging your device.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    7. Re: Only one word.. by Minion+of+Eris · · Score: 1

      I was aware of the lightbulb trick. Wasn't he also working on a way to tap into the magnetic field of the Earth itself, and use that to power devices? Possibly a conspiracy theory, but the story I heard was that when he was asked by his backer "And how would we meter that?" he replied "we won't, it'll be free" , and the funding was cut off.

      --
      Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say.
  9. No wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... a room constructed mostly of aluminum ...

    So no wi-fi or cell signal while the phone is charging: I assume the magnetic power field would silence any radio repeater inside the room. Can the aluminium be a quarter of milimetre thickness; not sheeting but not al-foil either?

    1. Re:No wi-fi by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The magnetic power field is easily filtered, so radio repeaters would still work. The thickness of the aluminum is not really important, they make capacitors out of aluminum foil and this metal room is just a big capacitor. Don't use thumb tacks, you'll get zapped. Strong magnetic fields are known to affect human cells.

    2. Re:No wi-fi by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Magentism is not easily filtered. You need a super conductor for that. See London (meisner) effect

    3. Re: No wi-fi by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Q1 = Q2.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  10. I've read this story before by dlleigh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Robert Heinlein's "Waldo": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  11. You first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You guys test it out and let us know how well it works.

  12. 95% delivery efficiency, my ass. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously this "delivery efficiency" number is the efficiency after converting the power to RF and before it's converted back into electricity. So basically, 95% is the maximum amount of RF that is intended to hit your phone's charging coil actually will.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:95% delivery efficiency, my ass. by guruevi · · Score: 3, Informative

      The paper says 40%-95%. The heat map indicates 95% would be only right around the center of the room and it drops off quite quickly (exponential, because physics).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:95% delivery efficiency, my ass. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      The paper says 40%-95%. The heat map indicates 95% would be only right around the center of the room and it drops off quite quickly (exponential, because physics).

      Doubt it is expentionally.. because physics. You probably mean quadratically/

    3. Re:95% delivery efficiency, my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt it is expentionally.. because physics. You probably mean quadratically/

      You doubt it's exponential because the exponent is 2? Quadratic growth is just exponential growth with an exponent of 2.

  13. OK, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "This enables power to be transmitted efficiently to receiving coils that operate at the same resonant frequency as the magnetic fields."

    So, there would have to be a standard or your phone charger only works at Disney.
    My phone didn't come with receiving coils at that freq, You can just add that to your iPhone right?!? Are these 'coils' flat i.e. just how much battery life do we sacrifice to recharge wirelessly.

    Aren't Aluminum rooms with copper poles in them going to have to become a LOT more common for this to be 'ubiquitous' ?

    ok, sounds nice for robots. Not so much for my living room where i want the robot :(
    Amazon warehouse I guess, but that hardly seems fair as they already have cool robots.

  14. Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't take any device that couples magnetic energy in there. No credit cards, no spinning hard disks, a lot of electronic devices will be toasted upon entry and should you happen to have any leftover metal parts from some past surgery (staples, clips, knees or hips) you don't likely want to try and enter either... Figure on having similar entry restrictions as MRI machines, including the faraday shielded room for this thing.. I wonder what a set of wire rimmed glasses will do in there, in fact anything that approximates a loop of wire could have serious issues if it's conductive.

    Basically they put you INSIDE a huge electromagnet with fairly high flux values. They resonate the whole thing to a specific frequency by inserting some capacitance, then size their collector (which is still larger than most cell phones) can collect power from the magnetic fields. Room size will be limited, basically because of the power density required to get useful power transfer is still really high and it will approach unsafe levels as the room gets larger.

    Not to mention... I dare you to grab the center pole.... It's going to have more than hundred amps flowing though it at RF (1.3 Mhz) frequencies that, despite what they say in their "safety" calculations, sure seems to be at power levels that can cause serious RF burns...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't take any device that couples magnetic energy in there. No credit cards, no spinning hard disks, a lot of electronic devices will be toasted upon entry and should you happen to have any leftover metal parts from some past surgery (staples, clips, knees or hips) you don't likely want to try and enter either... Figure on having similar entry restrictions as MRI machines, including the faraday shielded room for this thing.. I wonder what a set of wire rimmed glasses will do in there, in fact anything that approximates a loop of wire could have serious issues if it's conductive.

      Basically they put you INSIDE a huge electromagnet with fairly high flux values. They resonate the whole thing to a specific frequency by inserting some capacitance, then size their collector (which is still larger than most cell phones) can collect power from the magnetic fields. Room size will be limited, basically because of the power density required to get useful power transfer is still really high and it will approach unsafe levels as the room gets larger.

      Not to mention... I dare you to grab the center pole.... It's going to have more than hundred amps flowing though it at RF (1.3 Mhz) frequencies that, despite what they say in their "safety" calculations, sure seems to be at power levels that can cause serious RF burns...

      Exactly.

    2. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      One interesting application for this: My Garage.

      Wouldn't it be nice to pull into the garage, go inside, and the garage charges my car. Nothing to plug in...

    3. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be nice to pull into the garage, go inside, and the garage charges my car. Nothing to plug in...

      There are much safer and cheaper ways to do this than to turn your entire garage into a high-power magnet. E.g., two plates in the floor that match two contacts on the bottom of your car to provide charging power. Or a coil in the floor that aligns with a coil on the car for a more focused transfer of energy.

      Or drive a regular car. When I pull into my garage there is nothing to plug in. I have a patent on that no-plug system.

    4. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or insert a goddam plug. OMG, that takes 30 seconds!

      Lazy fat entitled millenial fucking pansy hiptards.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Or insert a goddam plug. OMG, that takes 30 seconds!

      Lazy fat entitled millenial fucking pansy hiptards.

      30 seconds? Why you giving him that long. You are likely going to wait longer for the garage door opener to open or close than it takes to plug in most electric cars.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Why do you need to turn your garage into a huge electromagnet to do that? Also, do you have ANY idea how much power that EV of yours actually wants to suck in and what this system is safely capable of? If you want to charge your car with a 15A 110V extension cord, you will do better than what this thing can deliver. If you have a high power charger that can recharge your battery in a couple of hours, this system won't be able to deliver the power your car wants at all..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there could be pole dancing!

      --
      Nate
    8. Re:Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA! That's hilarious. As if any millenials were making enough to ever own any of these devices. Tell your other pretentious gen-xers and parent boomers to cram your opinions of millenials up their collective asses because those opinions are almost always incredibly wrong.

    9. Re: Yea, that's interesting... Not going to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla already demonstrated robot snake plug.

  15. capacitors... by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Funny

    capacitors that separate the magnetic field from the electric field.

    What the actual flux?

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:capacitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way to separate an electric field from a magnetic field is to make them constant (i.e. non time varying). Check
      Maxwell's Equations. The article is total nonsense.

  16. Yes, 95% efficiency. . . at giving your ass cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/

  17. I Wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. Tesla Coil by kevink707 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't installing a Tesla coil have a similar effect?

    1. Re:Tesla Coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Everyone would be dead, but their phones would be charged.

    2. Re:Tesla Coil by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It practically is a Tesla coil in the middle of the room, except it's not shooting off streamers, the electric seems to be conducted by the walls.

      Efficiency is only 95% in a very small portion of the room (around the pole), for the rest it goes down to ~40%. So yeah, you'll be heating it up just like a regular transformer.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  19. Keeping Pace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that it will continuously charge your pacemaker even if you do not want it to? What about the metal (platinum or titanium) bolts and wiring holding your previously broken bones together, built in leg warmers?
    Definitely excited for this technology, hope they can simplify it down and make it practical since I am guessing there is not good cellular reception inside a metal room. An obvious application for this would be inside aeroplanes to reduce the numbers of wires installed to power the seat back entertainment systems or overhead lighting.

  20. Tesla (not the car company) by subk · · Score: 4, Informative

    A century ago, Nikola Tesla was convinced he could do this over great distances using broadcast towers (for lack of a better term). Due to what essentially amounts to corporate sabotage of his endeavors, we never got to find out if he was right.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    1. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory bash quote #221306
        man tesla was a cool guy
        he basically transmitted power over 30 feet without the use of wires
        i can do it too :P
      * arpit throws a battery

      In other news, I have a pocket calculator that has - get this - no batteries (ok maybe a little one) and runs entirely on excess radio waves. The caveat is that it only works when the lights are on, and even then it works best with incandescent light and not so well with flourescent.

    2. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      "corporate sabotage" <------- I'm going to use that excuse when my startup fails.

      Physics says there is no way he could have done it without huge power losses, so basically you're hoping he had invented new physics but hadn't told anyone about it. Which would be cool.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re: Tesla (not the car company) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and not so well with flourescent.

      Yup. All that flour dust gets in the way of the magnetic waves.

    4. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by subk · · Score: 2

      Of course what little we know about his work is also part speculation, so I consider Tesla's esoteric & unrealized works a mere curiosity. Meanwhile, the tinfoil hat crowd takes any rumor of Tesla's success as if it were written in stone by divine actor(s) and delivered to Moses on a mountain. It's all somewhat paradoxical; on the one hand he developed real-world, usable tech like alternating current motors and generators, while on the other hand claiming that he knew these things because he could tap into a universal, ethereal body of knowledge that exists in another dimension. You have to take his work seriously while still being aware that the man was possibly quite mad.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    5. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      while on the other hand claiming that he knew these things because he could tap into a universal, ethereal body of knowledge that exists in another dimension.

      That's interesting, where did he come up with those kinds of thoughts? How did he learn to tap into the other dimension?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by subk · · Score: 1

      Nobody knows. We just have quotes like this:

      “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
      -- Nikola Tesla

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    7. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      That sounds like some kind of shamanistic stuff. Get in a trance, travel to the center of the world, get taught while there. Or he was hitting the mescaline. Searching online, it seems like Tesla was extreme in anti-drugs, so probably not. However, his homeland of Serbia seems to have been steeped in shamanistic tradition, so he could have picked it up there. Someone went wild on that wikipedia page, there's a lot of information.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Even longer ago than that, Fermat was convinced that he had proof no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer value of n greater than 2.

    9. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      quote>That's interesting, where did he come up with those kinds of thoughts? How did he learn to tap into the other dimension?

      He was born that way. I don't know that it came from any other dimension or anything, but the schematic for the practical production of AC current came to him in a vision while walking on the beach.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's interesting, where did he come up with those kinds of thoughts? How did he learn to tap into the other dimension?

      He probably just stole a page out of a book in some mystic temple. I think there was a documentary about it released last year.

    11. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mad? Possibly just mistaken.

      He did the math, and invented useful things. Then he made his claim about wireless power transfer. Might be something as simple as a tricky math error in there. A formula used where it doesn't really apply - which is why nobody is capable of coming up with anything similiar - even though there would certainly be a market. Delivering large amounts of electricity in a controlled fashion is useful for consumers, and cheaper than wire. A less controlled delivery is still useful as a weapon; imagine a nuclear carrier appearing, and then delivering 1GW or so wirelessly through enemy weapons & structures. But it doesn't work that way.

      Another possibility is that what he envisioned was power transfer through radio waves. On a planetwide scale it works with an ideal conductive earth and an ideal ionosphere. But neither of those is anywhere close to ideal! If he started a power transmission, he might be able to deliver to nearby antennas, but he'll have huge losses from power dissipated straight into the ground and into non-antennas like trees & people. The latter might get annoyed by this.

      He did a crazy experiment with resonant circuits where he used the entire output from a power plant. Unfortunately, the power plant was then part of the resonant circuit and it broke down when power levels got too high. Not owning the power plant, he didn't get a second try. Too much thinking in "idealized components", not considering how you can only push so much current through non-ideal wire & equipment. Or what happens when you radiate power into a world that have lots of metal beyond actual "receivers" - including the lines that deliver power to your transmitter tower in the first place . . .

    12. Re:Tesla (not the car company) by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  21. Isnt this the same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That apple wingnuts thought that apple wireless charging was going to be. They were all so sure of it.

  22. Tesla (the original) had such a charging system. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Apparently he had a coil about 8 feet off the floor along the walls. Another coil placed at the same level would get current induced in it by the alternating current circulating in the loop. He published the work about resonant inductive coupling in the years 1891, 1892 and 1893. (Links stolen shamelessly from wikipedia.)

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  23. That metal pole by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

    Get a charge in a room with a central metal pole.
    Bring on the dancer.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  24. "the room with electricity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my favorite Simpsons scenes (Ned's destroyed house has been rebuilt by his neighbors): https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  25. Inside the battery by holophrastic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, aluminum walls, alluminum floors, copper pole in the middle -- I do believe that's actually a battery, using the air as the electrolyte. I think I might be staying out of that room.

    1. Re:Inside the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This couldn't possibly cause cancer or any other health/mental problems...

    2. Re:Inside the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pff! It's Disney - who's gonna notice anyone going a bit more nuts?

  26. Yay, more elecromagnetic fields by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    "you have to not mind being in a room constructed mostly of aluminum, that includes the walls, ceiling and floor."

    Which means you also have to not mind being in a room where you're bombarded with lots of intense electrostatic and electromagnetic fields, which I doubt is good for anyone, especially infants and toddlers. Close proximity to electrostatic or electromagnetic fields on a long-term basis is NOT good for you, period.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Yay, more elecromagnetic fields by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Close proximity to electrostatic or electromagnetic fields on a long-term basis is NOT good for you, period.

      Really?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Yay, more elecromagnetic fields by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Close proximity to electrostatic or electromagnetic fields on a long-term basis is NOT good for you, period.

      Really?

      Yup, really.

      There are three possibilities:

      1) exposure to strong electrostatic or electromagnetic fields is no effect whatsoever on humans.

      2) exposure to strong electrostatic or electromagnetic fields has a negative or deleterious effect on humans.

      3) exposure to strong electrostatic or electromagnetic fields has a positive or beneficial effect on humans.

      Which one is most likely? Remember, you're exposing a living creature to some strong (albeit non-ionizing) radiation.

      What's the chance that it does have some effect? Electromagnetic radiation applied to mice it seems to produce harmful effects. It's likely that humans, especially infants and toddlers, would also be affected.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    3. Re:Yay, more elecromagnetic fields by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't be a static field. Did everyone on this site fail high school physics, or is it an IT thing. The level of scientific literacy and complete lack of critical thinking skills makes my brain hurt.

    4. Re:Yay, more elecromagnetic fields by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      My father worked at a power station, they used to rotate staff through duties in the switching yard (where they ramp up the voltage for transmission along power lines) otherwise they would start getting sick. You could walk through the yard with a neon tube and it would glow faintly. So no, I don't think I would like being inside this room.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    5. Re:Yay, more elecromagnetic fields by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      You should apply your brilliant scientific methodology to the practice of injecting live viruses and mercury into infants and toddlers. You could start a new movement!

  27. What??? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "discrete high quality factor capacitors that separate the magnetic field from the electric field."

    What the fuck? That's NOT the way this shit works. This is utter nonsense.

    For the record, capacitors DO NOT "separate the magnetic field from the electric field". No. No no no.

    This is so wrong I don't even know where to begin.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might as well build a solar roadway around it. They can't even spell aluminium.

    2. Re:What??? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      "This isn't right. It's not even wrong"

    3. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so its a room inside a big electro magnet? oh nooes its going to mess with my magnetic hippie bracelet.

  28. I dare you to lick it while the system is on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I double dog dare you!

  29. Name? by kackle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are they calling the exhibit "The Cancer Of Tomorrow"?

    1. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Festivus poles were supposed to be made of aluminium, not copper.

    2. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends if the dancers are robots or humans. In the latter case poles should be made out of wood or, if time permits, thousands of twenty-sided dice super glued together.

  30. Copper pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stripers will explode...

  31. kilowatts of power to mobile devices inside that s by ChrisBrooking · · Score: 1

    kilowatts of power to mobile devices inside that structure

    Kilowatts? Now any phone can be like a Samsung!

  32. after several years of use... by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

    all users were found to be left brained could no longer have creative thoughts.

  33. So basically.... by adam525 · · Score: 1

    They are building a battery that you can walk into.

  34. Link To Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a link to the journal article that gives a lot more details. If you're a power electronics dork, it's a good read. Also, it clears up some of the BS statements in the submitter's article.

    http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169045

  35. Disney could charge phone while waiting in line by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    If you go to a Disney theme park, what do you do most of the day?

    Wait in lines!

    Why not charge people's phones while they wait in lines.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  36. It's coming.... by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    www.craphound.com/makers/download/

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  37. Stupid and dangerous by golodh · · Score: 1
    I think this idea is stupid and dangerous. Just image you have your entire house covered with this kind of wilreless plug.

    With ordinary appliances you can be fairly certain they're safe if you pull the plug. With a gizmo that taps a wireless power source in your house you can never be.

    If for some reason you want to do something to a device that's less than safe if it's plugged in you run a risk. If you want the device to be guaranteed shut off. e.g. because you want to clean it under the tap, or because it overheats (potentially causing a fire), or because you want to screw it open, you may have a serious problem.

    If you want to ensure some sneaky piece of hardware (like a "smart" TV set with voice command operation) is really off ...you're out of luck. If you've bought an appliance with IOT functionality that you don't want on all the time ... tough.

    As I've noted before, in this age of networked machines, the real issue is control. Who controls a given piece of hardware? You or the manufacturer? The manufacturer has several ways he can monetise control over an application. Ranging from privacy intrusion to enforcement of policies.

    Most ordinary people, good little consumers as they are, have already lost this contest. Their "smart" hardware can be under manufacturer control for all they know and may phone home and collect and transmit personal ("anonimised") data back to the manufacturer as that manufacturer sees fit. This basically applies to anyone who uses a smartphone, a recent car, or any kind of networked piece of electronics in "consumer mode". Only people with interest in (and expertise in) hacking and controlling their stuff can retain control.

    It will also allow the manufacturer to enforce all kinds of "policies" on the user of that appliance. E.g. a printer will stop printing when the ink cartridge tells it the allotted number of prints has been reached. Regardless of how much in is left in the cartridge. Or a "smart" espresso machine that refuses to work with any but the manufacturers own coffee cups. Or a console will refuse to play a non-authorised game. Several e-readers will refuse to display files that aren't on "allowed" servers, plus they will tattle about what you read, when, and for how long. If you're unable to run Wireshark on your home network (or simply lack the time) you may never know.

    This cordless plug is simply the next step towards a world where individuals' control over their home and the stuff in it is diluted and either off-loaded to whichever party thinks they can monetise a little piece of control over your personal surroundings, or routed through some piece of electronics that exercises actual control instead of the appliances' owner and balk in an emergency.

    If I want an appliance to work, I'll find somewhere to plug it in.

    1. Re:Stupid and dangerous by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      I'm going to show my age here... but I haven't been happy since mechanical on/off switches became passé.

      I don't want an 'access standby' button, I want an OFF button, damnit.

      It is ridiculous that if I want an actual off button I have to either unplug the device (or pull the battery), or have it powered through a power bar that (thankfully) still has a power switch on it that does something.