Slashdot Mirror


World's Only Sample of Metallic Hydrogen Has Been Lost (ibtimes.co.uk)

New submitter drunkdrone quotes a report from International Business Times: A piece of rare meta poised to revolutionize modern technology and take humans into deep space has been lost in a laboratory mishap. The first and only sample of metallic hydrogen ever created on earth was the rarest material on the planet when it was developed by Harvard scientists in January this year, and had been dubbed "the holy grail of high pressure physics." The metal was created by subjecting liquid hydrogen to pressures greater that those at the center of the Earth. At this point, the molecular hydrogen breaks down and becomes an atomic solid. Scientists theorized that metallic hydrogen -- when used as a superconductor -- could have a transformative effect on modern electronics and revolutionize medicine, energy and transportation, as well as herald in a new age of consumer gadgets. Sadly, an attempt to study the properties of metallic hydrogen appears to have ended in catastrophe after one of the two diamonds being used like a vice to hold the tiny sample was obliterated. The metal was being held between two diamonds at a pressure of around 71.7 million pounds per square inch -- more than a third greater than at the Earth's core. According to The Independent, one of these diamonds shattered while the sample was being measured with a laser, and the metal was lost in the process.

15 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Fake News by BoRegardless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hydrogen was not lost. It just sublimated.

    No chance in hell we will use metallic hydrogen due to pressures required.

    1. Re:Fake News by Nutria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. poised to revolutionize modern technology and take humans into deep space... someone at the International Business Times doesn't know what "poised" means.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Fake News by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hydrogen was not lost. It just sublimated.

      To be fair, it said "metallic hydrogen" has been lost, not simply "hydrogen" - so not fake.

      (P.S. People. Please stop misapplying the phrase "fake news". The fire's host enough w/o needlessly fanning the flames.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re: Fake News by ralphsiegler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And none of the researchers believe they can't make more. It's only a delay in metallic H research. "sadly", what drama queen wrote that slop?

    4. Re: Fake News by dougdonovan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they call it the media nowadays.

    5. Re:Fake News by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (P.S. People. Please stop misapplying the phrase "fake news". The fire's host enough w/o needlessly fanning the flames.)

      This. Fake news is written by fake reporters -- people who are deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead by writing fictional stories. It is not the same as real news with errors.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    6. Re:Fake News by Khyber · · Score: 1, Insightful

      " people who are deliberately trying to deceive, frighten"

      So they're terrorists and we need to press to have them charged as such - what the fuck are YOU doing to further this?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re: Fake News by knightghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no more news - there is only misinfotainment. With spelling and grammatical errors.

    8. Re:Fake News by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How can ordinary people tell what news is real news and what news is fake news when they can't trust the people who define it?

    9. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They wouldn't buy an expensive diamond. They'd create one in the lab. Lab ones are more pure and are actually less valuable, purely because of the De Beers monopoly on natural diamonds.

    10. Re: Fake News by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No woman I've asked likes the way brown diamonds look- even if you call them "chocolate".

      The weird thing is, I can't imagine why anyone would like a plain diamond. It just looks like glass. Rubies, emeralds and sapphires are colorful and can compliment ones eyes, or clothes or accessories, while diamonds just don't attract attention. Unless there's a dozen of them, in which case you're bankrupt.

      Of course, I'm just a man and I wouldn't understand anything a woman wants.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  2. Excuse my stupidity but I'm not a physicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But do they mean lost as in "it fell on the floor or something and is so small no one can find it?" or lost as in "it was metallic hydrogen but during the mishap it became something other than metallic hydrogen?"

    In either case, why don't they just repeat the process and create more?

  3. Re:Metastability by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, repeat an experiment with surprising one off results?

    You, sir, obviously have not spent enough time around modern academia!
    Once you get the result you *want*, you then spend 100% of your time writing, publishing, hyping, funding, and publishing some more.

    No one REPEATS experiments, my god, you may not get the same result! All that effort wasted!

    Sad, isnt it.

  4. implying incompetence ? by luckypunq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously .. scientist working at the extreme limits are criticised by talentless keyboard jockeys because of equpitment failure. Click bait shit at it's most disgusting. These men and women doing this work should be praised and admired not mocked by morons.

    1. Re:implying incompetence ? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We live in a society where companies like Diesel who run major fashion lines and advertising campaigns to glorify stupid. In all fairness, Diesel was trying to suggest that one shouldn't always take the "smart and sensible path", but people wore shirts saying "Smart is ok, but stupid is fun". The people wearing that clothing seemed to believe that doing the stupid thing could be far more productive and constructive than having and idea and properly planning and executing it in a constructive manor.

      We had a president who for 8 years told the American people that even as the son of one of the most powerful men in the world (Director of Central Intelligence or VP of the US as the time) was a C+ student... meaning that his professors, knowing there would be a call from one of the most powerful men on earth if they failed his son, gave him the lowest possible grade they thought they could get away with... in a business school. Now mind you, I really really like GWB, I think he is one of the nicest people on earth, a man with the absolute best intentions with a heart as pure as laboratory diamonds. Sadly, he's dumb as a brick and has absolutely no capacity for understanding the consequences of his decisions.

      When presented with the choice of Al Gore who is only mildly more intelligent but at least as far as politicians are concerned is a mental giant or GWB, the American people felt they associated much better with GWB. Even though Al Gore would likely make decisions to improve the lives of all people and would do his absolute best to represent the emotional, spiritual, etc... interests of all Americans, he came off as too smart and too nerdy (and too much of a know it all) and the people sided with the C+ flunky who had a good heart and spoke to the people in a way that they could relate to. I don't believe that was a calculated action by GWB as I believe calculation of any type is not his strength. I believe his sheer dumbness allowed people to better love and identify with him. I feel terrible that now that I know more about him that I said so many bad things about him while he was in office. It was like picking on the slow kid at school who couldn't defend himself because he didn't even understand the insults. He might be one of the best people on earth at heart and as a representative of the vast majority of the American people, he was spectacular. Too bad he was also expected to provide leadership, manage money and a military a role he was clearly no suited for. This is a very strong case for separating the presidency into president and prime minister.

      We also live in a society which glorifies hate and violence. We believe a child who dresses up in camouflage pajamas and spends 8 weeks in basic training should be called a hero for stepping up to protect the American way. Without having the slightest idea of what the American way is other than to dress up in said pajamas, he/she is placed in a position of ultimate judgement. He/she is expected to make conscientious decisions whether to take the life of a mother, a father, a son or a daughter. He is expected with no more experience than that of a child to represent the American people at the end of a gun and make judgement calls that have overwhelming impact on society as we know it. We call these children heroes and we praise them in media, advertisements and more. People forfeit business class and first class seats in support of their sacrifices for freedom.

      Consider that that child, fresh out of high school will make $18,802.80 a year as a private and can easily escalate to $22,165.20 by doing their jobs with some level of diligence within a year. Also consider they are provided with excellent quality (though questionable tasting) food, excellent medical care, excellent dental benefits, clothing, housing, career education, transportation and college aid. Their quality of life and standard of living when not at war is approximately equal to a $60,000 a year job at the age of 18 with absolutely no education other than a Basic and AIT provided