Indian State Saves $45 Million As Schools Switch To Open Source Software (factordaily.com)

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Indian State Saves $45 Million As Schools Switch To Open Source Software (factordaily.com)

Posted by msmash on Monday February 27, 2017 @02:00AM from the switch-to-foss dept.

From a report: The Kerala government has made a saving of Rs 300 crore ($45 million) through introduction and adoption of Free & Open Source Software (FOSS) in the school education sector, said a state government official on Sunday. IT became a compulsory subject in Kerala schools from 2003, but it was only in 2005 that FOSS was introduced in a phased manner and started to replace proprietary software. The decision made by the curriculum committee to implement it in the higher secondary sector has also been completed now. "It's not the cost saving that matters more, but the fact that the Free Software license enables not only teachers and students but also the general public an opportunity to copy, distribute and share the contents and use it as they wish," K. Anwar Sadath, executive director IT@School said.

88 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:04 · Score: 0

They switched to OpenOffice and are now switching back to Microsoft products because open source products are kinda garbage?
1. Re:Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:14 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  No, they always switch back after Microsoft bribes the right people.
2. Re:Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:24 · Score: 0
  
  No one ever got fired for buying Microsoft
3. Re:Didn't some country do this? by SteWhite · 2017-02-27 02:29 · Score: 2
  
  I wouldn't comment on the quality (or lack thereof) of open source software compared to their main commercial competitors, since I haven't enough experience of the former to make a proper judgement.
  What I would say though is that just because the software is FOSS, that doesn't mean zero cost.
  Sure, you don't have to buy licenses, but you still need all the infrastructure to deploy it, and especially to support it. If your users have more difficulty using the open source alternatives for whatever reason, you will spend more money on staff to provide sufficient support. If your support staff aren't good with it either, you might need to invest in training courses and/or more qualified staff. Heck, you might even need an expensive support contract with another company to provide 3rd line support.
4. Re:Didn't some country do this? by newdsfornerds · 2017-02-27 02:31 · Score: 1
  
  Damn. You stole my thunder.
  
  --
  Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
5. Re:Didn't some country do this? by jandersen · 2017-02-27 02:49 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  - yet. That is exactly what people used to say about IBM products - up until the day in 1993, when IBM posted massive losses and had to lose something like half its workforce, if I remember correctly. If nobody has got fired for buying Microsoft, it may well be because management simply are blind to the very significant cost of keeping a Microsoft only environment in the air, especially on the server side.
  In the beginning, when Linux started to be taken serious, there was a lot of nonsense being said, like 'You get what you pay for'; then more and more engineers started wailing about how much trouble Windows servers were, compared to Linux, and in the last several years, even management in many companies have moved away from automatically going for Microsoft software. As far as I can see, Microsoft products are beginning to be regarded as legacy software that you can't get rid of yet. It could be that we will see the day when people will get fired for buying Microsoft, when there clearly are much better options available.
6. Re: Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:50 · Score: 0
  
  But if you have employees who have difficulty learning Foss, you can figure out who to fire in the future. If they are so slow to learn and inflexible, they WILL be a problem in the future. It's a great screening tool.
7. Re:Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:53 · Score: 0
  
  That is stolen from "No one ever got fired for choosing IBM"
8. Re:Didn't some country do this? by jandersen · 2017-02-27 03:04 · Score: 2
  
  If your users have more difficulty using the open source alternatives for whatever reason, you will spend more money on staff to provide sufficient support.
  True - but that comes down to investing in education, and that hurdle is a lot smaller than you might think. A lot of universities teach their students Linux, either directly or indirectly; when most of the advanced SW is available only on Linux, and the teachers all speak from a UNIX/Linux perspective, the students have to either translate everything to Windows terminology - or just pick up Linux. Inevitably there will be a large crowd in the technical jobs, who know and like Linux and are reluctant to use Windows; the last pocket of resistance, in my view, is from the administrative staff, who find they have enough trouble getting their Windows based systems to work and fear that it might be even worse if they have to move to something unfamiliar. Proper education is the obvious answer - once people get used to a Linux based system, they will appreciate the fact that there are fewer problems overall.
9. Re: Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 03:06 · Score: 0
  
  In Germany, the cost savings were elusive, and the responsibility for maintaining the software stack themselves was more than the city gov't wanted, as I recall.
  
  "At the moment in many cases it just takes far too long and costs far too much for the city to implement software that's available as standard on the market. This must change, so that the city remains competitive in an increasingly digital service society," she said.
10. Re:Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 03:30 · Score: 0
  
  There is a lot of resistance to change in the staff that support Microsoft products. They rule the roost (DNS/Mail/Calendar/Office). That may be the impediment that holds back US adoption of FOSS, despite substantial equivalent offerings.
11. Re:Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 03:30 · Score: 0
  
  SNOWDEN. There are many places in the world where Microsoft and other companies have and are losing government support. Russia China and Brazil to name just a few. Software cost and convenience are lesser matters than the serious security issues with American software and hardware. Many countries will go back to Microsoft if the get the full mass surveillance capabilities Microsoft software offers. I don't know of any country that has moved away from open software but Munich, which is a city in Germany has.
12. Re: Didn't some country do this? by tehcyder · 2017-02-27 03:32 · Score: 2
  
  But if you have employees who have difficulty learning Foss, you can figure out who to fire in the future. If they are so slow to learn and inflexible, they WILL be a problem in the future. It's a great screening tool.
  This is one of those posts that you desperately hope is a joke, but deep down you know the poster actually means it, and thinks they're being clever.
  
  --
  To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
13. Re:Didn't some country do this? by dougdonovan · 2017-02-27 03:53 · Score: 1
  
  good for the schools as the younger generations will get into open source. i did a linux migration for ibm back in 12-13 here in phoenix, az. we put a win7 kvm on the gnome desktop so the end user would not be too confused due to the lack of the "start" button. the majority of ibm customers do of course use ms office outlook for email instead of lotus notes. unfortunately, several mobile ibmers ( 20+ years with the company ) that visited our 2 man office decided to take early retirement rather than learn a new operating system that promises no viruses.
14. Re: Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 04:26 · Score: 0
  
  You are stupid.
  This is what you just said to someone else without any actual evidence why you should be more right than the other. Stop insulting people.
15. Re:Didn't some country do this? by Joshs922 · 2017-02-27 05:16 · Score: 2
  
  As far as I can see, Microsoft products are beginning to be regarded as legacy software that you can't get rid of yet.
  I agree. After using Microsoft products for 30 years, we are moving away from them at home and at work. And Linux does almost everything we need. Quickbooks and AutoCAD are two things that are making it hard to make a clean break. At home, I'm running Quickbooks 2009 on an early-2000s era Windows XP computer for now - simply because to me, Intuit Quickbooks Pro for Windows is the ultimate accounting software for home/SMB. This could be run in a VM on Linux but my old PC needs a job. I am investigating switching to GnuCash at home to solve this dependency problem. At work, the CAD engineers will get Macs when its time to upgrade their machines. Its just a different set of evils there with Apple but at least we won't have to contend with the Windows 10 subscription model, telemetry, onerous privacy policy, forced updates and upgrades and constant UI changes, et al ad nauseum.
16. Re:Didn't some country do this? by MightyMartian · 2017-02-27 05:19 · Score: 1
  
  That is true enough. And even though OpenOffice and LibreOffice are more than capable of doing almost all the tasks one can ask from an office suite, there are enough differences between that and MS Office that one can get tricked up. But the reality here is that whenever you bring in new software, you have to put resources into training. With MS-Office being near-ubiquitous, organizations and firms tend to have the expectation that existing staff and new hires are just going to know at least the basics, and with MS having done what I think anybody can see as an excellent job with low-cost editions for students and the like, MS-Office is a software ecosystem with a high degree of penetration. Frankly, in my company, I haven't seen a CV cross my desk in years that didn't cite experience with Word and Excel, which means that even if I wanted to save money on licensing, and go with LibreOffice or OpenOffice, I'd end up having to do a lot of training and support, and while I suspect the cost of retraining existing staff would be lower, it would also mean having to train every new employee, so in a way, you have a recurring cost that may end up not being that much different than MS licensing.
  
  --
  The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
17. Re:Didn't some country do this? by StormReaver · 2017-02-27 05:25 · Score: 1
  
  I haven't enough experience [with FOSS] to make a proper judgement.
  But that didn't stop you from spewing bullshit, anyway.
  I, on the other hand, deal with both on a daily basis. Closed software not only costs far more up front than Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), but it costs far more to maintain as well. While I suppose there can be closed software that is more cost effective than FOSS, I have yet to run into it during my 32 years in business.
  The retraining costs to my customers are neglible, as most of the significant FOSS systems are either self-explanatory for even semi-literate people within their respective fields, or don't require an investment in up-front training; but rather features and subsystems are learned as the need arises. I find that it's the proprietary software that requires most of the retraining and expensive staff, as online help for proprietary software tends to be obtuse and/or expensive.
18. Re: Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 05:26 · Score: 0
  
  I believe Iceland is the national gov't pushing for this. It's part of an EU draft directive to favour FOSS for software procurement. One of the main reasons, not often mentioned, is to agree on and implement database standards so that interoperability between regions, countries, cities, etc. is easier and cheaper. The biggest obstacle isn't Microsoft per se, it's proprietary databases that are close to impossible to interoperate with other systems.
19. Re: Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 05:41 · Score: 0
  
  If your tech team can't adapt to new software then why not fire them? I see nothing wrong with that post. You either adapt or die. It's Darwinism for fuck sakes.
20. Re:Didn't some country do this? by chipschap · 2017-02-27 05:49 · Score: 1
  
  How good, really, is Microsoft support?
  When Munich talked about not supporting products alternative to available off the shelf commercial software--- I have trouble seeing the difference. Microsoft products have a big support requirement in a corporate environment, as do FOSS products. Is there much difference? It's not like you call Microsoft and they send you a fix for xxx problem. Most support is found online, and there is plenty of it, for both commercial and open source products ... with the big difference that if you have something really critical, you can patch your FOSS product. Try that with Microsoft products.
  Munich suits got bought out by Microsoft suits. The arguments over support are bogus.
  Now, to address specific software items you mentioned. GnuCash is certainly good, but Ledger, if you can stand working with text files and the command line, really does the job. Neither of them is especially suited to a multiuser environment, though, but there are some FOSS ERP projects out there. AutoCAD ---- not so much available at a pro level, unfortunately.
21. Re:Didn't some country do this? by chipschap · 2017-02-27 05:56 · Score: 1
  
  Further on retraining: when Microsoft, as they do from time to time, decides to switch to the latest hipster UI, you have significant retraining costs. Remember when the ribbon was introduced? Remember what Windows 8 was like? I don't think minor FOSS retraining is such a big thing. If you have basic computer literacy, you can go from (say) MS Office to LibreOffice without major dislocation, at least for the vast majority who don't use super-advanced features.
  LibreOffice, at release 5.3, has come a long way. File compatibility has become a minor issue or even no issue for typical documents. LibreOffice now even offers an optional ribbon interface for those that really have to have it.
22. Re: Didn't some country do this? by cyber-vandal · 2017-02-27 07:57 · Score: 1
  
  You call Microsoft and, depending on the issue, you speak to their tech support or if they can't help, you get an engineer. They run regular conferences and workshops where you can meet and ask the devs questions, they give you an account manager who can liaise with the devs should you need advice, they have shitloads of code samples and video tutorials and their primary dev framework plus loads of other parts of the software stack is on GitHub and so on and so forth. It's nowhere near perfect but the idea that running complex software is just a matter of Googling it is laughable no matter what the tech is.
23. Re: Didn't some country do this? by cyber-vandal · 2017-02-27 07:59 · Score: 1
  
  You obviously learn new tech instantaneously but us mere mortals may take a week or two to get our heads round it.
24. Re: Didn't some country do this? by cyber-vandal · 2017-02-27 08:03 · Score: 1
  
  Whereas there have been no breaking UI changes in any FOSS products ever.
25. Re: Didn't some country do this? by chipschap · 2017-02-27 08:14 · Score: 1
  
  Of course there have been FOSS UI breakages, but the point is that the "no retraining" advantage of Microsoft is an illusion.
26. Re: Didn't some country do this? by chipschap · 2017-02-27 08:17 · Score: 1
  
  Running complex software is indeed not just a matter of googling. Decent support staff are of course needed.
  The kind of Microsoft support you speak of sounds like an expensive Cadillac option. The question is, does it produce that much more than the type of support you get in on-line forums frequented by other experienced people? I don't think the answer is any sort of obvious "yes."
27. Re: Didn't some country do this? by cyber-vandal · 2017-02-27 08:43 · Score: 1
  
  So you think being able to speak in person to someone who works on the project is no better than asking a question on Stack Overflow? Of course it costs money. Is good OSS support free?
28. Re:Didn't some country do this? by minstrelmike · 2017-02-27 08:51 · Score: 2
  
  Micro$oft moved an entire department to Munich and that's what did the trick for the mayor. As a complany, they know how to address the "real" problem.
29. Re: Didn't some country do this? by cyber-vandal · 2017-02-27 10:39 · Score: 1
  
  It may be an illusion as you say, although there doesn't seem to have been a major problem with it, but it's not just the interface but the custom templates, the macros and the third party plugins and document generators that FOSS advocates always pretend don't exist. The cost of migrating away from them, especially if nothing suitable is already on the market, can be prohibitive. If it was as simple as you say then there would've been a stampede away from proprietary software. This simplistic "it's just a drop in replacement" is just not the case. It's an expensive and disruptive change for very little justifiable gain.
30. Re: Didn't some country do this? by chipschap · 2017-02-27 11:04 · Score: 2
  
  I'll certainly grant that you're correct in the situation where MS products have been in use for some time and workflows have been built around customizations, templates, etc., as you rightly point out. Migration could indeed be difficult and expensive, although retraining would be far from the largest part of the cost. (I'm obviously a big FOSS supporter but I won't ignore reality.)
  In a case where there is a clean start, however ... or the possibility of a relatively clean start ... I think the situation would be a lot different.
  Take a small business startup. Do they really need to have MS products? Or will FOSS be more than good enough?
31. Re: Didn't some country do this? by chipschap · 2017-02-27 11:08 · Score: 1
  
  If you have a level of support that allows you to speak to the developer(s) directly and get direct answers and assistance, obviously that's worth a lot. That sounds like a high tier of support at presumably a matching price ... as you might reasonably expect.
  But the support fora for FOSS products very often have the developer(s) as participants. Is it just as good as a direct phone line? Of course not, and there are no guarantees (something important to some businesses). But it seems to work out pretty well.
32. Re: Didn't some country do this? by cyber-vandal · 2017-02-27 11:17 · Score: 2
  
  FOSS will be more than good enough. I'm not wedded to Microsoft. Even they have embraced open source so why wouldn't I? I love having the ability to dig into the tools I work with and would find it much harder if I couldn't.
33. Re: Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 16:33 · Score: 0
  
  Lol, too funny...you assume everyone gets hot and bothered about the prospect of learning new software. I guess you and a few others would have so much fun teaching others how to use the new tooling...and of course if they didn't learn it the instructor is fired...not the students.
34. Re:Didn't some country do this? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-28 15:12 · Score: 0
  
  sadly many switch back when the software they want to use is only reliable on windows.
What? by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · 2017-02-27 02:17 · Score: 1

150,000 Indian Rupees are $2250 which sounds simply astonishing. I guess someone bought something which wasn't really needed, so color me unconvinced.
Besides the article gives exactly zero information about the obtained commercial software. To me everything looks a little bit too fishy.
1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:27 · Score: 1
  
  So? "It's not the cost saving that matters more, but the fact that the Free Software license enables not only teachers and students but also the general public an opportunity to copy, distribute and share the contents and use it as they wish,"
2. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:56 · Score: 0
  
  The claimed savings arenonsense, the linked to article says that the 'annual savings' will be $45M across an estimated 20K desktops, yielding an ANNUAL savings of $2,259/desktop!
  If cost savings aren't the motivator, then we need to rewrite the headlines in both this article and the linked-to news story to reflect that the real motivation is a Richard Stallman-like vision of complete control of their software.
  In America, a student computer annual license to run the latest versions of Windows, Office, and a handful of other software packages AND the server CALs to access windows servers is about $35, I have to believe MS has a similar offer in India, which would make the annual cost savings about $700K for those same 20,000 desktops.
  Not quite as dramatic, is it?
3. Re:What? by ElizabethGreene · 2017-02-27 03:50 · Score: 1
  
  It certainly doesn't "feel" right. The per capita income for Kerala is Rs100,000.
4. Re:What? by ElizabethGreene · 2017-02-27 04:00 · Score: 1
  
  Damnit. Slash dot ate my less than sign. That should read "Less than Rs100,000"
5. Re:What? by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2017-02-27 04:48 · Score: 1
  
  Entity references are your friend. Try < next time.
  
  --
  Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
6. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 05:51 · Score: 0
  
  So by going open source they save 45m on 20k computers, but if they go Microsoft they save 700k on those same 20k computer ? I don't see how your argument is in favor of MS? What are you even saying?
7. Re:What? by unixisc · 2017-02-27 10:37 · Score: 1
  
  Doesn't work - this site has a pretty crippled HTML
8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 12:36 · Score: 0
  
  Doing business in BRIC countries can be challenging. The joke below explains some of it.
  A Brazilian businessman invites a Russian and Indian businessman over to his 25 room mansion. Then he points at a bridge in the distance and says it costs $50M USD and half was paid to him. The next week, the Russian businessman invites the Brazilian and Indian businessman over to his 50 room mansion. He points to a bridge in the distance and tells them it costs $100M USD and half was paid to him. The next week, the Indian businessman invites the Brazilian and Russian businessman over to his 100 room mansion, He points into the distance and says the bridge costs $200M USD. The Brazilian and Russian businessmen see nothing and ask where is the bridge. The Indian businessman replies, "Exactly...."
9. Re:What? by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2017-02-28 13:15 · Score: 1
  
  < ... < ... <
  WFM. Shouldn't be affected by your choice of formatting options, either, AFAICT. Did you forget the trailing semicolon, maybe?
  
  --
  Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
Wait, Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:21 · Score: 0

Will come along with the bribe money and the higher ups will make the decision to switch back to Micro$ofts products.
And Microsoft jumped in to give them free licenses by newdsfornerds · 2017-02-27 02:30 · Score: 1

How could Microsoft let this happen? Didn't they bribe the right people?

--
Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
Free Software by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:32 · Score: 0

At last someone who dares to say "Free Software", instead of this (pout lips) Open Source. Even Slashdot has fallen for it. As if it were dirty to have a vision.
I have one. Have you?
More Corruption by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:33 · Score: 0

So now they can do more corruption... .. Isn't this should be India wide thing.. to use OpenSource OS..
Re:Nuke India by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:34 · Score: 0

Are you talking about unleashing the MS and Oracle license compliance inspection teams by intercontinental airplanes? That's just cruel and usual.
Bad case of ideology by TimothyHollins · 2017-02-27 02:46 · Score: 1

"It's not the cost saving that matters more, but the fact that the Free Software license enables not only teachers and students but also the general public an opportunity to copy, distribute and share the contents and use it as they wish," K. Anwar Sadath, executive director IT@School said.
Strange, because here I thought it was the quality of education that mattered more.
I suspect that the extra time spent fidgeting with FOSS to make it work will ultimately lower that quality. The only silver lining I see is the "education" of fidgeting with stuff you don't understand until it works (which is how I got started on my computer interest).
1. Re:Bad case of ideology by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 03:00 · Score: 0
  
  > Strange, because here I thought it was the quality of education that mattered more.
  *Exactly*. And part of this education is to learn to think for yourself, instead of outsourcing your thinking to some $bigcorp, whose interests are... umm... not always aligned with yours (unless you are its CEO, that is).
  > I suspect that the extra time spent fidgeting with FOSS [...]
  Yah. Reproducing Microsoft's and other's FUD is actually helping here (NOT). Unless you are.... see above.
  Guess what? I work in a mixed environment and the fidgeting is more or less the same on both sides. The user satisfaction... Free Software wins, hands down.
the way Common core should be by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 02:47 · Score: 0

This is how Common Core SHOULD be set up. It should be Open Source Free ware for all the states and anyone else to use.
The Gates foundation "gives" money to schools, who are then buying Gates Foundation tools.
The school is then locked into giving more and more to Gates for proprietary lessons.
Gates makes them proprietary by teaching "New and improved" methods, that you are not allowed to copy.
Make it open source and best practices, the other problems with Common Core will go away.
Doing their part by Dan+East · 2017-02-27 03:00 · Score: 1

So if I get this right, India is making a huge income off of outsourcing, H1B, etc, working for American companies developing software and then having that income funneled back into their country, but they won't buy that software even at reduced educational rates? Good to see they're doing their part.

--
Better known as 318230.
1. Re:Doing their part by 140Mandak262Jamuna · 2017-02-27 03:28 · Score: 2
  
  So you want India to be patriotic to America?
  
  --
  sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
2. Re:Doing their part by Zontar+The+Mindless · 2017-02-27 03:32 · Score: 1
  
  Thank you for the fine example of something known as "false equivalence".
  
  So if I get this right, India is making a huge income off of outsourcing, H1B, etc, working for American companies developing software and then having that income funneled back into their country,
  It's not India the country or the Indian government getting rich. It's some Indian businessmen getting rich off gouging the workers they send overseas.
  
  but they won't buy that software even at reduced educational rates? Good to see they're doing their part.
  That's the government of an Indian state. Whose schools in all likelihood are not getting financed by the aforementioned businessmen.
  What you're suggesting is akin to suggesting that the public schools in North Dakota naturally have more money than they know what to do with because Microsoft is an American company that makes lots of money, which is not really the case, is it?
  
  --
  Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
3. Re:Doing their part by PPH · 2017-02-27 04:28 · Score: 1
  
  Yes. Or we'll build a wall.
  
  --
  Have gnu, will travel.
4. Re: Doing their part by orlanz · 2017-02-27 06:24 · Score: 1
  
  We don't pay Indians in Rupees... we pay them in dollars. They eventually HAVE to buy something that takes dollars and have it come back here... maybe just not as much in MS software.
5. Re:Doing their part by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 08:26 · Score: 0
  
  > H1B, etc, working for American companies developing software
  They also work for American companies such as Google, Apache, IBM and many others developing FOSS software.
  Or did you think that Microsoft is the only American software company ?
Re:And Microsoft jumped in to give them free licen by NotInHere · 2017-02-27 03:13 · Score: 1

Kerala is india's hotspot for open source software: https://www.cnet.com/news/indi...
Re:Kill All Muslims by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 03:15 · Score: 0

Very wise.
Countries adopting FOSS by Archtech · 2017-02-27 03:16 · Score: 1

And Brazil. E.g. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/bus...

--
I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
1. Re:Countries adopting FOSS by snookiex · 2017-02-27 08:42 · Score: 1
  
  You mean this Brazil?
  
  --
  Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
Management failures are not product failures by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 03:34 · Score: 2

This complaint "it just takes far too long and costs far too much for the city to implement software that's available as standard on the market" is something I have herd repeatedly of several different UK local government IT set ups, all of which are near-pure Microsoft. A report by a Microsoft partner highlighting that people thought that their large central IT is slow to respond and too expensive is a joke, like a bear pointing at another bear and going you s*** in the woods. The actual report given in Munich did not even manage to make a clear case to switch. Despite this the politicians still said jump, which may have something to do with the new Microsoft headquarters in Munich, you scratch my back I scratch yours, and all that.
Oh no! by PPH · 2017-02-27 04:31 · Score: 1

Now where will they learn "Try turning it off and then on again"?

--
Have gnu, will travel.
Indian IT workers are less expensive ... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 04:43 · Score: 0

than western IT workers now. Soon they will be much better trained on average too from exposure to and familiarity with open source software and practices.
Cost savings bullshit from a fool... by bayankaran · 2017-02-27 05:21 · Score: 4, Informative

They are talking about savings based on money they don't have.

The linked report says the assessment is based on Rs 150K ($2200) per machine cost for using proprietary stuff. No government in India will spend that sort of money on software licenses, forget about the spent on educational sector. This is imaginary stuff.

Here's the annual budget for the state of Kerala - https://kerala.gov.in/documents/10180/3793571/Revised%20Budget%202016-17_3 Go to page 4, and you can see a section for "Office Expenses" (which should include hardware, software, chairs, hammocks, water coolers, desks, fans and whatever else) for the whole state, including Department of Education - its Rs 220 CR, less than the claimed cost savings.

Its like claiming "I saved $100 million when I decided not to purchase an Airbus."

I am from Kerala. I have heard about the chappie mentioned in the report...a self aggrandizing fool.

--
Tat Tvam Asi
1. Re:Cost savings bullshit from a fool... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 08:42 · Score: 0
  
  Agreed 100%. FSF India (http://gnu.org.in) is based in Kerala.
2. Re:Cost savings bullshit from a fool... by asvravi · 2017-02-27 09:08 · Score: 1
  
  Way to troll. How do you even know what the "Office Expenses" in a "Budget at a glance" head contains? FYI, it is just that - "office" expenses and no, that does not include software/hardware for schools. Kerala's expenditure on education is around Rs.15,000 crore in 2016-17 - refer page 25 of the detailed financial statement straight from Finance dept. You are either a fool or far removed from India and reality if you think just Rs.220 crore includes entire Kerala's education spend. You are two magnitudes off - in future, do a favor and do not comment authoritatively on things you know zilch about.
  The 150k value per machine includes not just Office software but FOSS replacements for other highly valuable ones like Matlab, Animation software, Molecular modelling, Interactive geometric sketching etc.
  Finally, what's with the ad hominem argument? I'll just leave this here.
3. Re:Cost savings bullshit from a fool... by bayankaran · 2017-02-27 11:46 · Score: 1
  
  You are a class A moron and a liar. I did not say Kerala's education spend is Rs 220 CR, I said "office expenses" would include cost of software.
  
  Kerala's expenditure on education is around Rs.15,000 crore in 2016-17 - refer page 25 of the detailed financial statement straight from Finance dept.
  
  Yes, and what does that entail? Salary to teachers/staff.
  
  The 150k value per machine includes not just Office software but FOSS replacements for other highly valuable ones like Matlab, Animation software, Molecular modelling, Interactive geometric sketching etc.
  What silly nonsense! Add software costs which NASA uses to send rockets out of solar system and you will get a $5000 per machine figure. Then the cost savings will be even higher. And the idiots behind the PR release may get free PAZHAM PORI from the morons running the scheme.
  
  --
  Tat Tvam Asi
4. Re:Cost savings bullshit from a fool... by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 21:29 · Score: 0
  
  An ad hominem argument right? What is under discussion here is the merits/demerits of the move, not your own bigotry. You accuse someone of being a "self aggrandizing fool". What does that say about you?
5. Re:Cost savings bullshit from a fool... by bayankaran · 2017-02-28 03:17 · Score: 1
  
  Why is this bigotry? The claim in the report/article is absolute nonsense. It does not matter if the claim came from Jesus Christ or Mohamed or Siva or Buddha!
  
  The PR guys wanted to show their boss in good light. But when making such claims please make sure its somewhat reasonable.
  
  --
  Tat Tvam Asi
6. Re:Cost savings bullshit from a fool... by sad_ · 2017-03-01 00:03 · Score: 1
  
  Still valid, they may not have that amount of money to waste on licenses, but they would have used the software anyway (illegaly). The cost, when caught, could have been even higher than what is mentioned here. Going FOSS, this will not be an issue, ever, even after audits.
  
  --
  On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
Re:And Microsoft jumped in to give them free licen by newdsfornerds · 2017-02-27 05:43 · Score: 1

Doesn't mean shit, usually. Follow the money.

--
Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
Re:Kill All Muslims by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 06:16 · Score: 0

I think Windows NT is a decent operating system. It's a shame the desktop shell they put over it. How will NT help us kill all moooooooooooooooooooooslims?
Re:Nuke India by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 06:20 · Score: 0

Drastic times call for drastic measures. Perhaps that's why he thinks Windows NT will help.
But you know the UN being politically correct and all that will demand some kind of watchdog group for the Oracle team. I admit, some of the things they do maybe ought to be crimes against humanity.
Its about time by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 06:58 · Score: 0

It is common knowledge that piracy is rampant in India and so how much money can be saved?
That being said it is good to see India is waking up to the benefits of open source.
Re:Should have spent that money on toilets by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 07:12 · Score: 0

The government installed toilets and they still shit in the streets. The fucking savages.
Re:They’ll Regret it by HiThere · 2017-02-27 07:15 · Score: 2

For some weird definition of good.
If you were discussing switching away from Apple, I'd at least seriously consider your point. Lots of people seem to like Apple. With MS the most you can say is it's what they're used to...but many actively hate it.

--

I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
Looking forward to.. by sit1963nz · 2017-02-27 08:00 · Score: 1

So so looking forward to "This is Ubuntu calling, we have detected your machine is running a virus......."
FSF Indian success by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 10:35 · Score: 0

If cost savings aren't the motivator, then we need to rewrite the headlines in both this article and the linked-to news story to reflect that the real motivation is a Richard Stallman-like vision of complete control of their software.
Funny you should mention it. I recall reading something on the FSF India website about them persuading this very state government to switch to FOSS, and the example they used was Libre-Office.

In America, a student computer annual license to run the latest versions of Windows, Office, and a handful of other software packages AND the server CALs to access windows servers is about $35, I have to believe MS has a similar offer in India, which would make the annual cost savings about $700K for those same 20,000 desktops.
Not quite as dramatic, is it?
You are looking at it only in terms of US$. When you translate it into Indian rupees, it translates to quite a bit of cash, so anybody there would be happy to save. Also, in India, almost all Microsoft software is pirated, so going this route also means going with cleaner software that is at least perceived to have fewer holes
The Last Sentence by amiga3D · 2017-02-27 10:48 · Score: 1

The most important thing about open source is you're free from all the BS in a proprietary license. You don't have to worry about swapping software or how you use it and all the other crazy BS that MS limits you with. Want to use it in a VM? No one cares! I migrated a friend to Linux after he upgraded his Windows box with a new hard drive and video card and it started bitching about verification. He called up MS and they gave him some crap and he got a little angry. I installed Ubuntu (this was before Unity) and he was happy as he could be with it.
And they saved even more on plumbing by Anonymous Coward · 2017-02-27 11:44 · Score: 0

By shitting in the streets. But that isn't news in India.