Slashdot Mirror


Marissa Mayer Is Giving Yahoo Employees Her Annual Bonus To Make Up For Massive Hacks (theverge.com)

Following two separate security breaches revealed last year that compromised the personal information of more than 1.5 billion users, Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer announced today via her Tumblr page that she will be redistributing her annual bonus and equity stock grant to Yahoo employees. The Verge reports: Relevant to Mayer's admission here, an independent committee Yahoo brought on to investigate the hacks found the company to be at fault for not sufficiently responding to the security incidents. "While significant additional security measures were implemented in response to those incidents, it appears certain senior executives did not properly comprehend or investigate, and therefore failed to act sufficiently upon, the full extent of knowledge known internally by the company's information security team," reads the committee's findings, which are contained in Yahoo's 10-K report for 2016. As a result of the hacks, Yahoo's top lawyer, Ron Bell, has been fired, Recode reported today. Mayer has accumulated about $162 million during the five years she's spent as the company's CEO in both salary and stock awards, according to CNN. She's also due about $55 million in severance if she decides to leave the company following its acquisition by Verizon. So it's safe to say her bonus would involve a hefty amount of money now going to Yahoo employees who have weathered the storm throughout Mayer's tumultuous tenure.

108 comments

  1. Meh. by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "she will be redistributing her annual bonus and equity stock grant to Yahoo employees."

    Not hard to do, if you already have more money than you could ever reasonably spend. At her level, money is not a means of exchange, it's just a tally on a scorecard.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Meh. by Karlt1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree but give credit where it's due. Do you see the Waltons giving bonuses to their employees?

    2. Re: Meh. by imgod2u · · Score: 3

      Walmart does give a lot of bonuses to employees at around the same level of skill as a typical Yahoo employee...

      And comparatively speaking, Walmart is doing great business wise so it's not like the CEO deserves a pay cut for some massive fuck up.

    3. Re:Meh. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      I agree but give credit where it's due. Do you see the Waltons giving bonuses to their employees?

      They give bonuses every year. They even have monthly incentive bonuses, track bonuses, scan bonuses(people who clear checkouts fast), sign-up bonuses for their credit card(pay for each app, and a monthly bonus for the most signups), employee with highest customer approval call-ins, and so on. I'm constantly amused at the number of people that think walmart is some evil sweat shop and the people there get paid nothing. When in most places they're paid above min. wage by $2-5/hr. It is a bottom level job, but that also doesn't stop you from moving up in the company into white collar positions.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her bonus is pennies compared to her severance. Her bonus is around $1.7 million.
      She will never give up her severance which is $55 million this year.
      $1.7m to her would be equivalent to buying a PS4 Pro and giving it to a needy child in China.

    5. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but it's still nice. I've worked for more than fifteen start-ups, and none of the executives did anything nearly as nice as this.

    6. Re:Meh. by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Do you see the Waltons giving bonuses to their employees?"

      John-boy has employees?

      Seriously, Mayer has taken a going business and run it into the ground (which is merely saying she couldn't overcome the inertia). Walmart continues to grow, even in the face of Amazon, where few other retailers have had success. Isn't it better for them to spread the benefit wider through growth and more employees, rather than deeper with fewer? In any case, they do pay bonuses, in addition to employing about 1000x more people that Yahoo.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:Meh. by msauve · · Score: 1

      s/1000/100/

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    8. Re:Meh. by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Bonuses aren't really bonuses if they're incentives for doing more work.

      And $2-$5 above minimum wage is pretty much nothing, which is why only teenagers, illegal immigrants,and total fuck-ups work for such a rate.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    9. Re:Meh. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      From Waltons' personal fortunes?

    10. Re: Meh. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      I never understood how a company that is the 5th most visited website in the world couldn't be doing better.

    11. Re: Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      walmart doesn't even offer health insurance to the vast majority of its workers. especially at retail, the MOST IMPORTANT part of the business.. the ONLY part that is face-to-face with customers. for the most part, they are all limited in hours, and are disciplined if they go over, to just below the threshold for being eligible. fuck walmart.

      their 'bonus' is usually a holiday ham or turkey, extending their "generous" discount to grocery for a month, instead of being only on general merchandise (aka the stuff a 'non supercenter' would sell) or produce. employee stock purchases? so totally not worth it. actual bonuses? not for the rank-and-file. plenty in bentonville get them, though.

    12. Re:Meh. by geek · · Score: 2

      Bonuses aren't really bonuses if they're incentives for doing more work.

      Spoken like someone who's never had a bonus. Do you even know wtf a bonus is for? Hint, it's not altruism.

    13. Re: Meh. by lucm · · Score: 2

      actual bonuses? not for the rank-and-file. plenty in bentonville get them, though.

      Wrong. Most people at Walmart headquarters are paid below market for their skills and the perks are nowhere to be found. Being a cheapskate is a virtue in that organization; there's even a famous senior manager who uses cheap patio furniture provided by a vendor (as a sample) in his office.

      As for retail employees being paid low wages: that's how the market works, and that's how Walmart can sell stuff at rock bottom price. Anyone who applies for a job at Walmart and doesn't know this in advance is a fool.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    14. Re:Meh. by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bonuses aren't really bonuses if they're incentives for doing more work.

      That's the exact idea behind a bonus. It's not because of altruism. The only case where this is different is if your company is a co-op or has profit sharing. The company I work for has profit sharing, which means I usually get a nice check for $10k-$15k/year. A friend of mine works for a co-op business(related to farming where this is common), and if there's more money being made everyone gets a cut and the rest goes into the "rainy day" fund for when times are bad.

      And $2-$5 above minimum wage is pretty much nothing, which is why only teenagers, illegal immigrants,and total fuck-ups work for such a rate.

      Then you should really turn around and get your high school diploma and either pick a trade, become a bus or truck driver or a worthwhile major instead of majoring in genders/womens studies shouldn't you? These jobs weren't meant to be filled by anyone but teenagers and young adults, but most of the people in those jobs are now 30+ To be realistic, around here your brand new hire at walmart is making around $14/hr. Now where I live as a part time job(under 30hrs/week), you can live comfortably on that in a good apt, or saving up to buy a house and have spending money to spare. If you live in Toronto, Ottawa, London? Well no. That's the reality if you don't live in major cities, at $14/hr even with a min wage of $11.25/hr you're going to be fine.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    15. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonuses aren't really bonuses if they're incentives for doing more work.

      What an amazing comment. Mind-boggling.

    16. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They say they give those, but I knew someone who'd worked there since the time when they actually gave bonuses (the 90s) until a couple years ago. Those bonuses don't materialize.

      What they do give is unpaid overtime for low level management.

      Spend your money somewhere better, like North Korea.

    17. Re: Meh. by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya.

      Yahoo! started out as a search engine and instead of cultivating their core competency, decided to be a "portal," where a user could get the buffet for free (advertiser-supported).

      Meanwhile, Google stepped in and said, "fuck the portal," and nailed the search engine market.

      Here's the take according to guess who?

      Google executive Marissa Mayer, the web giant's twentieth employee and first female engineer, pulled back the curtain Tuesday [Mar 27, 2012] evening to reveal why Google's stark white homepage looks the way it does.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    18. Re: Meh. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Being a cheapskate is a virtue in that organization

      Sam Walton required Walmart employees who attended conferences or trade shows to return with at least three dozen free pens.

    19. Re: Meh. by lucm · · Score: 1

      Being a cheapskate is a virtue in that organization

      Sam Walton required Walmart employees who attended conferences or trade shows to return with at least three dozen free pens.

      $150 billions, one free pen at a time.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    20. Re: Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having also worked there for 7 years, I can corroborate that the pay is way below average and there are no perks. In fact, they won't even give you office supplies like pens or pencils - you have to buy those yourself. To top it off, they have a 45-hour workweek, meaning you're really being paid even less than you think.

      It's amazing how people get trapped at ISD or Home Office. They buy houses and have families, and then when they decide they want to leave, there's nowhere else to go, and they can't get rid of the house. The schools and city centers have really gotten a facelift over the last few years, though.

    21. Re:Meh. by johnsnails · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a cruel joke since bonus' are usually tied to performance ergo she was really giving them nothing.

    22. Re:Meh. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Like you would have given your bonus to employees in that situation. Or maybe you would have, but in that case you are quite a rare person.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re: Meh. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Your beef-fat-and-cheese farts smell pretty bad to them, too, pasty-boy.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    24. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's true. But why rewarding lazy employees who couldn't defend the company from hacks?

    25. Re:Meh. by Kartu · · Score: 1

      The fact that she actually receives bonuses for running a company from fail to epic fail deserves some credit too..

    26. Re:Meh. by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      Do you see the Waltons giving bonuses to their employees? agreed. she needs to get on with her life. the employees could care less about her but, sure, they'll take the money, she will enjoy the tax deduction that she can reinvest back into yahoo.

    27. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better question. How on earth does the person leading the shit show that is Yahoo even get a bonus. Like how bad do you need to shit the bed before you no longer get a bonus? She is sitting on 5 years worth of bad ideas, plunging stock prices, and data leaks. They should have cut her the cheque for 55 million, and pushed her off a tall bridge years ago.

    28. Re: Meh. by Monoman · · Score: 1

      IIRC Yahoo started out as a directory. Links were submitted for approval or added by Yahoo. Back before search engines were good (pre Alta Vista) Yahoo searches had good results because their database was curated by humans.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    29. Re:Meh. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The Walmart CEO makes significantly less than Mayer, only a few dollars an employee. They could not even buy a meal with the money if Walmart distributed their CEO's cash. Meanwhile, it is a very significant raise for every single employee if Mayer does so.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    30. Re: Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think you should be able to work in bumfuck Arkansas with it's relatively low cost of living and make a Silicon Valley salary/bonus. A Bentonville McMansion will get you a studio apartment (if that) in SFO.

      Good luck with that. Look on the bright side, you can always work at that other wellspring of jobs in Bentonville....Tyson Foods.

    31. Re: Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn- so disappointing to see Meyer's net worth stuck below the $500 million barrier. Just another glass ceiling that won't be broken.

    32. Re: Meh. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      So you think you should be able to work in bumfuck Arkansas with it's relatively low cost of living and make a Silicon Valley salary/bonus. A Bentonville McMansion will get you a studio apartment (if that) in SFO.

      Good luck with that. Look on the bright side, you can always work at that other wellspring of jobs in Bentonville....Tyson Foods.

      ^^^ This.

      I could go buy a home, hell a ranch, for half of what I paid for my 3-bedroom home. But then, I wouldn't have one of the best elementary schools in the entire South Florida region within walking distance, in one of the best suburbs in the nation, with reliable internet, and have a somewhat readily and reliable supply of high paying tech jobs within 45 minutes of commute.

      If/when shit hits the fan, I can (more or less) reliably find another job at a comparable salary. In other, much cheaper areas, that's just not effing possible.

      By the same token, I wouldn't be able to buy a 2-bedroom apartment (not house, not even condo, but apartment) with what I paid for my house if I lived in Silicon Valley. But I would have a much greater supply of job opportunities at my disposal.

      I think SV is an aberration as far as COL goes, even with all the tech jobs out there. But for all other large cities, here and abroad, a higher COL goes hand in hand with a greater pool of jobs.

      There is a point where moving to a much cheaper area is tantamount to job seppuku as far as I'm concerned. This is specially true in software/IT where you *must* plan to change jobs (or be forced to change jobs) every 4-6 years.

    33. Re: Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't generally buy apartments. Unless you're buying a whole building full of them, apartments are rented.

    34. Re: Meh. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      People don't generally buy apartments. Unless you're buying a whole building full of them, apartments are rented.

      Not true. There are lot of apartment owners in high rises designed specifically for buyers, in many cities. It might be unusual in one city, but certainly not in another.

    35. Re: Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Yahoo will be acquired by Snap :-D, now that snapchat is several orders of magnitude bigger than Yahoo.

    36. Re: Meh. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The directory eventually got too large and it became too hard to find anything in it. It might have worked while the amount of websites available was small but it collapsed afterwards. Mind you there were search engines before Altavista (e.g. Lycos) but yeah they kinda sucked.

  2. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably $100 or so per person before taxes. Not bad, but the money probably doesn't go very far for those in Silicon Valley, and that would be most of them.

  3. Now we know there's somsething toxic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo is absolute radioactive poison if the CEO isn't keeping the money.

    They've probably made a pact with some world-eating demonic entity or something.

  4. WTF, Meyer Ordered Yahoos To Do The Dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marissa Meyer, God's Beloved, ordered Yahoos to hack 1.5 million user's accounts to make them available to a "Third Man".

    Now She graciously gives a few Pennies to to her minions for a "JOB WELL DONE"!

    Oh, How Sweet, A Tear In The Eye, ... May God Bless with quivering penis Marissa Meyer, Nazi, and may her "Edelweiss" grove stronger in the Nazi valley of Sunnyvale, CA.

    1000-years of happiness!

    1. Re: WTF, Meyer Ordered Yahoos To Do The Dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen

  5. What about the victims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So Marissa Mayer screwed up, Yahoo employees screwed up, 1.5 billion users had their personal information compromised -- so give the EMPLOYEES a bonus?!?

    How about something for the 1.5 BILLION users whose information was compromised?

    1. Re:What about the victims? by lucm · · Score: 1

      How about something for the 1.5 BILLION users whose information was compromised?

      Here's something for those people: "fuck you".

      In a nutshell, that's what they get.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:What about the victims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      0.11cents/user

      Get 9 of your fellow yahooers together and split a penny. You get what you pay for

    3. Re:What about the victims? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Came here to say much the same as you and the parent.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:What about the victims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out how these breaches were in any way the responsibility of their lawyer.

  6. Why not give it to the people who suffered? by hambone142 · · Score: 1

    AKA, Yahoo customers.

    I'm a paying customer. Where's my remuneration for my problems?

    1. Re:Why not give it to the people who suffered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly did you pay Yahoo? I've used Yahoo, but haven't paid them a dime.... Except perhaps, ignore the nonsensical ads they put up, which I ignore. Poor saps that actually buy those ads on Yahoo are the real suckers.

    2. Re: Why not give it to the people who suffered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They paid them user data. Which may have contributed to identity theft.

  7. Wrong recipients by Scutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe she could give her bonus to the people whose accounts got hacked through Yahoo's gross incompetence.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Wrong recipients by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

      Here tumblr note says:

      ...I have agreed to forgo my annual bonus...

      which sounds like it wasn't her idea. Perhaps she could be persuaded to cough up something to the account holders?

    2. Re:Wrong recipients by geek · · Score: 1

      There is no way it was her idea. She's being pressured by the board and likely Verizon also to start trying to save Yahoo's image. She's as phony as they come.

    3. Re:Wrong recipients by Monoman · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should also include the salary of the guy who got fired for it all... Ron Bell, Yahoo's "top lawyer". It really looks to me like Yahoo's senior management team got some crap legal advice about their "risk exposure" ... aka how much it was going to cost them if they did the right thing vs say nothing.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  8. Still can't get into e-mail, even with password... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't have access to your old phone? Recovery e-mail not working? Then Yahoo says, Get Lost.

    Have your ID, password, and digits of old number? Why can't you login? OH YOU HAVE TO PROVE ITS YOU.

    But you can't. Even though obviously you have the password.

    Give me your bonus you witch

  9. Incompetent.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incompetent employees that build an infrastructure able to be routinely hacked! Let's award them! Quality leadership.

  10. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, why?

  11. nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She gave bonuses to the incompetent fools who were responsible for the hack, I mean who implemented the NSA requested feature.

  12. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What she will ruin in her next position?

    1. Re:I wonder by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Oh she will get another executive job, just like Steve Elop. These people are our new royalty, and companies need someone of noble blood to lead them.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  13. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That horse-faced thunder-thighed ninny has made herself somewhat useful!

  14. $162 million in 5 years ? by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    DId I read that right ? That's just fucking stupid.

    A programmer (for example) with more that 15 years of active experience that spent countless hours learning new stuff, and improving himself, making $200k a year (if he's lucky), cannot even 'accumulate' 1 million in five years... how the fuck are these CEOs making this much money ?

    $55 million in severance ?

    1. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These are CEOs of non mom-and-pop companies. She's underpaid by comparison.

    2. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Incompetence pays the most in the USA.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by geek · · Score: 1

      Not only that but Yahoo was offered nearly 50 billion as a buyout before she came on board. They are now selling for 4 billion. Not even a tenth of the previous value.

      10 years from now I'll be telling my son life isn't fair, here's the proof.

    4. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      The offers are not comparable. The $50B offer included the Alibaba shares. The current deal doesn't.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by lucm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Feminazis keep saying that it's not her fault, that she was set for failure, that is was a glass cliff. But she did everything wrong; antagonize business partners, antagonize paying customers, shutdown profitable units to subsidize pet projects, let tech leads go and replace them by overpaid googlers. Again and again people came up with suggestions, solutions, plans; but she turned them down and kept driving this profitable company into the ground.

      Those millions she walk away with are not about her expertise. They're the price Yahoo pays for a complacent board that went for the flavor of the week: a female CEO with a tech background that looked good in photoshoots.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    6. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Welcome to capitalism: monarchy rebranded.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Don't say that just because your liberal arts degree didn't pan out for you.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:$162 million in 5 years ? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      My education was in IT, you know, those tech jobs that are supposedly in demand. But that doesn't matter, after all the best predictor of a person's income is their father's income, because this ugly fucking evil system is just a cover for perpetuating wealth and poverty throughout the generations.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  15. Bets it's to executives... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    She needs to take her and ALL executives bonuses and start with the lowest paid employees and go up from there.
    Start with saying sorry for being a worthless CEO that is killing the company.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Bets it's to executives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo has been dying for a while and it isn't MM's fault. What is her fault is the culture that allowed the numerous hacks to happen--at least that is her fault if we are saying that her virtues are worth $162 million over 5 years.

      I think more grossly overpaid CEOs (almost all of them) should take a hit when things go south, so I applaud the move whether it began with her or the board.

  16. I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-World by Duckman5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    actual bonuses? not for the rank-and-file. plenty in bentonville get them, though.

    I actually worked at Wal-Mart for 7 years and have several phone calls out to a few market managers because I wouldn't mind going back (at a much higher pay rate after I'm done with school). I'm in the pharmacy, mind you, but the seven years I spent there were as a tech. I can assure you that the rank and file get bonuses every single quarter. There's a big poster in the break room tracking progress. The bonus is given based on store performance in four categories (profit, inventory turns, total sales, and something else). If you're at a high performing store you can make an extra $2000 a year or so (sadly that's ~10% extra for a full time employee). Number-wise for someone like you who probably makes six figures it's probably not much, but to those people who are barely above minimum wage it's huge.

  17. No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't want her annual bonus, we want her to get the fuck out and leave behind her unearned obscene golden parachute.

  18. Explain something to me... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How is she getting a bonus? If it's scheduled then it's not a bonus, it's a wage. If it's not scheduled then WTF has she done to deserve a bonus?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Explain something to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears CxOs are getting bonuses for just sticking around. Or perhaps for not doing more damage than possible? /s

    2. Re:Explain something to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... getting a bonus ...

      Bonus doesn't mean 'gift'. Work was performed, you were just paid more than the agreed rate, so it is part of your wage. Which is why those adverts to "buy 1, get 1 free" are incorrect: It's a bonus, which in that case, is scheduled; you know when you put your money down, that you're getting more than one unit of merchandise for your money. Likewise, the Christmas bonus that was paid, once upon a time, was a part of the wage paid at a specific time, in addition to the payment of the normal wage.

      ... WTF has she done to deserve a bonus?

      CEOs are given performance metrics, which when achieved, result in more wages: Technically, it's closer to 'overtime' than 'bonus' but the metrics tend to be something the CEO can't affect directly, such as the share P/E ratio increasing by 2 points. (Investors are paying more than the share is worth.) Which is why a CEO can cut jobs and product lines, and still get more wages.

    3. Re:Explain something to me... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Well, she didn't behave like UBER's CEO....

    4. Re:Explain something to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on what bonuses are tied to, and that is agreed up front. e.g. BP's CEO bonus last year was huge. All of our bonuses were. We raked in huge amounts of money it was great. Incidentally it was also the first time BP has ever reported a loss. So it stands to reason that we shouldn't get bonuses right?

      Well our bonus structure was dependent on a few things, but making money was not one of them.
      - Cash flow was and we turned over plenty of that.
      - Safety was and we set new records there.
      - Operating costs was too, and we reduced those as much as we needed to (but clearly not enough to make money).

      I'm inclined to think Yahoo was similar and the bonus scheme was not at all tied to security.

      Posting AC for obvious reasons.

    5. Re:Explain something to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After this massive screw up why is anybody getting a bonus, scheduled or otherwise?

  19. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    ~10% says it all - 10% of an insult is, actually a bigger insult.

    I refused an offer for a teaching assistant position that would have paid for my PhD, plus ~$22K/yr salary, had just completed a similar gig for a Masters' degree - 2 years of indentured servitude in exchange for a dubious piece of paper was enough, thank you.

    WalMart employees aren't even working toward something ostensibly valuable to their future life, they're just sharing rent in a cheap apartment, saving up to maybe buy a car someday.

  20. brb, moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is this place?

    1. Re:brb, moving by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Where is this place?

      It's called "southwestern ontario" but watch out for the high electricity prices, insane green energy policies which are driving people broke and getting repeatedly fucked over by Toronto(because that's who the provincial government panders to). Or, you can move to eastern canada and work in the fisheries. Harder work, very seasonal, good pay, cheap lobster(aka poor people food as it's known there). But most of the people I know especially newfies work half the year in manitoba or alberta and go home for the seasonal stuff.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  21. why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why give her bonus to Yahoo employees,they are the ones who helped in the multiple cocktails ups that have led to massive amounts of data being stolen,how about giving it to the people who have actually suffered a loss,the account holders ?
    Yahoo employees have lost nothing,they were already thought of as some of the most usless dicks in the I.t sphere,most would struggle to get a job elsewhere if forced to admit that they had worked at Yahoo for very long..
    Let's see some kind of proof from you Yahoo that these were "state sponsored" attacks,it looks more like an insider job to me..

  22. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by Duckman5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You realize, though, that the crappy situation you're talking about is something endemic to the US economy and not just Wal-Mart. There's a reason that so many people are pushing to raise the minimum wage. Wal-Mart, right before I left, announced that there would be a $10/hr minimum for front-end workers which was a decent improvement from the previous status quo.
    That being said, Wal-Mart isn't that bad of a place to work, especially after you break through that living wage barrier and get up to store level management or higher (and they will promote almost anyone as long as they are reasonably competent and stick around long enough). They even offer health insurance to part-time employees (again, if you've been there long enough). From what I understand, it's not as awesome as when Sam was still alive, but it's still not bad.

  23. Typical CxO thinking by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    The arrogance on display by top-level executives is astounding. Mayer is going to voluntarily give up her bonus, what a sacrifice! Of course, she didn't intentionally screw up, so it's not her fault. The fact that any other employee who screwed up his/her area of responsibility would be (and was) sent packing? Doesn't matter, the elite are not to be held accountable.

    What is it about bonuses, anyway? They are handed out to top-level execs like candy - even in the case of the worst business failures, the bonuses are never docked. Note that Ms. Mayer still received $35 million in 2015. For what, exactly? Presiding over the downfall?

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  24. Why'd she get a bonus in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why'd she get a bonus in the first place?

  25. Lawyers by Monoman · · Score: 1

    "As a result of the hacks, Yahoo's top lawyer, Ron Bell, has been fired"

    This is probably all we need to know.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  26. Are you sure, she wrote that email? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Someone probably hacked into her email and released a statement in her name to embarrass her.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  27. Rewards for failure.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello my name is (((Mayer))) and I get rewards based on my religious background. Want to pick a winner, pick my religion. Now you know the pattern, feel free to buy IPO based on it.

  28. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    Agreed, WalMart is just the poster child for the larger living wage problem. When I was in High School (80s), jobs like that (in my town) were 80% staffed by kids with no real income needs - just for pocket money, there would be the occasional older loser who just didn't care that they could only afford to live in a trailer park with 3 roommates in an 800 square foot tin can built 30 years ago, and once in a rare while - a true hardworking person in a tough situation who was just using the income to get by until they got something better.

    Today, there are so few better opportunities out there that the demographic of who's working near minimum wage jobs has become much more diverse, and people who really want out don't have nearly as much opportunity to get out. It's not impossible, but it's much much more challenging and competitive.

  29. It's bitztream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating Slashdot troll!

  30. Now a real CEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally has got out of the Silicon Valley ' 'hippie bubble' and the learned money buys you everything.

    Got a problem, buy your way out of it. It's the greedy businessman way...

  31. Yeah, about that... by BajTaur · · Score: 1

    The Associated Press is reporting that the Yahoo Board decided not to pay Marissa Mayer her annual cash bonus. Her message was sent out after that point requesting that the money, that she now isn't receiving, be distributed to Yahoo employees. The board has not yet decided to honor her request. Mayer did offer to also relinquish her stock award, which the board apparently accepted. So she has that going for her.

  32. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by Duckman5 · · Score: 1

    Agreed, WalMart is just the poster child for the larger living wage problem. When I was in High School (80s), jobs like that (in my town) were 80% staffed by kids with no real income needs - just for pocket money, there would be the occasional older loser who just didn't care that they could only afford to live in a trailer park with 3 roommates in an 800 square foot tin can built 30 years ago, and once in a rare while - a true hardworking person in a tough situation who was just using the income to get by until they got something better.

    Today, there are so few better opportunities out there that the demographic of who's working near minimum wage jobs has become much more diverse, and people who really want out don't have nearly as much opportunity to get out. It's not impossible, but it's much much more challenging and competitive.

    I'm glad we found a common ground. I see the same thing happening. Even in the 90's when I was in high school, I knew people who worked at K-Mart, Pizza Hut, grocery stores, and other low wage positions. Now those positions are increasingly staffed by older people. A knew quite a few people at Wal-Mart who were teachers trying to supplement income on the evenings and weekends. It's a sad commentary that the people who are educating my children are having to work 7 days a week just to make ends meet or provide a decent living for their own kids. How much time does that leave for lesson planning outside of school? Something needs to give. I don't think huge minimum wage increases are the answer because that will make everyday items more expensive and lead to even more job elimination. I'm personally a big proponent of the various universal basic income schemes. We'll see what happens in the future, but the status quo is just not heading in a good direction.

  33. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    I have special needs kids, they need aides to function in public school classrooms, so aides are provided. Not good aides, mind you, just warm bodies who help keep them from being "a problem in the (cough) learning (cough) environment." One of our kids' assigned aides worked stock at Target on the midnight to 7 shift before coming to be his aide through the school day.

    So, when our kids had good aides, teachers who cared, etc. they made great progress in school - learned, advanced, became less dependent on special help. Most of the time, when we had burnt out Target stocker class aides, we were lucky if we didn't have significant backsliding, problems staying in school through the whole day, etc.

    When you cheap-out on labor too much, you create problems that are far more expensive than just paying decent wages in the first place. The WalMart et.al. rise to economic dominance has been based on externalizing these problem costs while benefiting from the cheap labor.

  34. why should ANY company "provide" healthcare? by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    This is part of the problem with the cost of health care in America. Employer provided health care. This all got started at the end of WW2, with so many men coming back from WW2, employers were hiring by the truckloads. To "entice" workers, they started to provide health care coverage. Go forward 70 years and look what happened. Now, you ask about 99% of the people, what it costs to go to the doctor, and most of them will say "my copay is". No, that wasn't the question...how much does it cost to go to the doctor? They will look at you with the deer in the headlights look. They have NO IDEA what it actually costs to go to the doctor, how much their prescriptions costs etc. They only think they pay the copay and that's it. When the consumer is removed from the ACTUAL cost of healthcare, you see the prices rise up, like they have. Granted, health care and advancements in technology have extended the health and life of most Americans, but, with the consumers not "actually" paying for a lot of it, they have no idea how much the costs are, and, being locked into a health plan, their choices are limited, under that plan, who they can and cannot see. If one doctor charged 85 dollars for an office visit, and another one charges 40, but the first one is "free" on the plan, which one you think they will see? With competition taken away, due to employer provided or partially paid for health plans, consumers don't have a lot of choice to shop around for the best price.

  35. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by operagost · · Score: 1

    Because a graduate student working as a TA is totally the same thing as someone who might not even have a GED stocking shelves.

    #whiteprivilege

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  36. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by operagost · · Score: 1

    Have you ever thought to ask those teachers how much they make, and what their expenses are? I'll bet they overextended themselves, like many of us. And if they truly are underpaid, that's purely a local problem that needs to be handled in your school board meetings. In my district, for what is at most 10 months of work the average teacher earns about what I do (plus superior benefits), and I have 20 years of experience in my field. But no one wants to have their OWN property taxes raised. They want the federal government to step in and make the "rich" (everyone who make more money than you) pay for it.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  37. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    I got that TA position while attending Uni on a scholarship - not too much privilege required to get there, other than the fact that my parents were self-sufficient so I didn't have to go out to work to keep a roof over their heads.

    So, the big contrast TA vs WallyWorld Minion is that I was on the "ain't gonna be doing this forever" track, whereas you need to win a minor lottery to take a step up the WallyWorld ladder. I got to choose when I stepped off the subsistence income merry-go-round and into decently paid employment.

    Sadly, even college grads with MS degrees now need a degree of luck to move up from the minimum wage + 10% level.

  38. A man would've taken the money and run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She can't even do that right.

  39. Re:I got a bonus every single quarter at Wally-Wor by Duckman5 · · Score: 1

    Have you ever thought to ask those teachers how much they make, and what their expenses are?

    No, I've never done that because that would be rude. It's not my place to judge them. Of the one with whom I had a personal relationship, I know he had a child with greater-than-average medical needs. The others seemed to signal that they were just trying to make some extra money.
    I don't know where you live, but in my state, the average teacher salary is ~$50,000/year (source). I wouldn't exactly call that rolling in dough, especially when you consider that many have a master's degree and also have their own kids to take care of. Also, our budgets for resources and supplies is garbage in this state. Many teachers ask for donations of paper, glue, etc from the parents. Many end up buying the stuff they don't get with money out of their own pockets (so that employee discount helps). The problem just magnifies when you get to poorer school districts.

  40. Misleading Title, again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was not a benevolent act according to other news sources, it was revoked by the board.

  41. How's life in the hypocrite lane?

  42. Half-measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another misguided half-measure from Mayer. If you really feel that your employees deserve your bonus and you do not, you should be writing a resignation letter.