Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Finally Releases A Beta Version of Skype For Linux (betanews.com)

"We want to create a Linux version of Skype that is as feature rich as the existing Skype on desktop and mobile platforms," read Thursday's announcement from Microsoft's Skype team. "Today, we're pleased to announce that we are ready to take the next step and promote Skype for Linux from Alpha to Beta." They're promising more than just better performance and bug fixes. "We have been listening to you and added in some of your top requests." Slashdot reader BrianFagioli shares the list:
  • One-to-one video calls can be made from Linux to Skype users on the latest versions of Skype for Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac.
  • Calls to mobiles and landlines with Skype credit.
  • Linux users can now view shared screens from other Skype desktop clients (Windows 7.33 and above, Mac 7.46 and above).
  • Unity launcher now shows the number of unread conversations.
  • Online contacts in contact list now include Away and Do Not Disturb statuses.

66 comments

  1. no group chat? by gmack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No group chat for Linux? This is actually a step backwards.

    1. Re:no group chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also does this one require PulseAudio like the last releases did? Older Linux releases worked without PA, but they got blocked from use ages ago.

    2. Re:no group chat? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Where does it say no group chat?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:no group chat? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      I no longer care about Skype, it has had its peak.

      Once it was good, but now it's bloated and not much resemblance to what it once was aside from the name.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:no group chat? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except it's universal as email for group meetings and job interviews

    5. Re:no group chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for the Linux crowd.

      Any interviewer that *expects* skype is not one I want.

    6. Re:no group chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      nearly every group meeting I go to uses webex

    7. Re: no group chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WebEx official slogan is: the only application with worse Linux support than Skype.

    8. Re:no group chat? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Except it's universal as email for group meetings and job interviews

      What are these "job interviews" and "group meetings" you speak of? I live in my mom's basement, all I have to do is text her when I'm ready to eat.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    9. Re:no group chat? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      It's the technology when that blonde 19yo cutie you've been roleplaying online with wants a face-to-face chat and whom you discover is really a bearded 36yo male from Cleveland named Kevin.

    10. Re: no group chat? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you have to keep a special copy of a 32-bit version of Firefox and Java around if you want *any* of it to work...

    11. Re:no group chat? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I guess they're thinking "It's not like Linux users actually have any friends".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    12. Re:no group chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why you have no job.

    13. Re:no group chat? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      No group chat for Linux? This is actually a step backwards...its microsoft, consider the "source", they are still the primary os globally on the corporate enterprise levels. you can lead the horse to water but if the water doesn't stay starbucks on it, they'll go to dunkin' donuts because it is the easy way to retirement.

    14. Re:no group chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at Oracle, where its use for any sort of company communications is strictly forbidden. If you even mention it by name in an email, you'll get a very quick and not at all friendly response from Legal.

    15. Re: no group chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WebEx official slogan is: the only application with worse Linux support than Skype.

      Slack seem to be recommending appear.in as an alternative. What little information about it seems to suggest that it will be better than Slack for privacy and monitoring and similar for security.

    16. Re:no group chat? by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      Well oracle gets it.

      Skype defeats the purpose of using linux. Why would you ever run that on a secure computer? A real linux user would dual boot into an insecure Windows partitions in order to run this eavesdropping software.

  2. No text search by kav2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even though text messaging isn't the main feature of Skype, still not having any ability to search for text in conversation is crippling.

    1. Re:No text search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype includes full text and voice search of the entire history of every convo you've ever had... courtesy of Microsoft's TOP SECRET partnership with the NSA.
      Ditch skype.
      Choose Tox or Ricochet or Signal or something better like that.

    2. Re:No text search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be completely fine if text was dropped entirely from skype. Mainly because a lot of people I know use it *only* as an instant messenger, and I'm forced to load up that steaming POS every time I need to get a hold of them. There's currently 500 better IM programs out there but everyone insists on using what might be literally the worst possible (major)one.

    3. Re:No text search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know it's stored in sqlite database files. This is at least the case for iOS the last time I checked.

  3. Escape from Skype! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So long as I can't stop the escape key from closing a chat, Skype is useless to me. People have pleaded for years, but Microsoft hates its customers.

    1. Re:Escape from Skype! by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      You need a new mac with touchstrip, I never seem to be able to hit the ESC key.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  4. As the old adage says by ruir · · Score: 1

    Beware of presents from Greeks.

    1. Re:As the old adage says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. They ought to rename it to Spype.

      Wire is available for linux, supports group chat, and can't be eavesdropped on by Microsoft and their NSA buddies.

    2. Re:As the old adage says by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      The new adage says, "Beware of lending money to Greeks!"

      But anyway, I think you are spot on. FTF Announcement: "we have been focused on building a new experience that is in line with Skype’s ongoing transition from peer-to-peer to a modern cloud architecture".

      In other words, they want to drag you kicking and screaming into their cloud architecture. Oh, and say, "Hello!", to Microsoft Windows 10 Telemetry Spyware on Linux.

      You are the Fish, Microsoft is the Fisher, and Skype on Linux is the worm on the hook.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:As the old adage says by ruir · · Score: 2

      They are not deceiving anyone....It is just MS being MS.
      Government bitch, turning Unix more unstable, creating problems of compatibilities where there is none, binaries or interfaces that never mesh well with the native OS.
      It is neither in their best interest it works as well as Windows, nor has not ever been their policy supporting continuity of business.
      Those who drink the kool aid may think otherwise...

    4. Re:As the old adage says by umghhh · · Score: 1

      It actually does not work very well on windoze. I stopped complaining about windoze ever since I got win7. It has its quirks but it kind of works and does not bother me all too much. But skype of all ms products I have a chance to use is worst. I have also used many different chat SW and this is also the worst I have ever met except maybe FB.

  5. 64-bit by crow · · Score: 1

    Skype was one of the few remaining programs where the only available Linux version was still 32-bit. I still have the old version installed, though I haven't used it in ages.

    I think the only other 32-bit program I still have around is Adobe's Acroread, which they've discontinued for Linux.

    1. Re:64-bit by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Well, this one is not only "64-bit" only, it is specifically amd64 only. No arm64, no siree. And I'm typing these words on an armhf laptop.

      Not that anyone sane would run a closed blob of known spyware anywhere near their client machine, which either has important private keys on it, has ssh keys (most likely currently unlocked) to log to machines with such private keys on, or has a key stick put into it from time to time.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:64-bit by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Hi. This is your client. Ever since you came over here with this GNU thingies I have been unable to open PDF files that work with DRM signing. Can you fix it?

    3. Re:64-bit by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      Sure, sending a polite email to Adobe for you. I'm sure they'll get right on that.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    4. Re:64-bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he said "Can you fix it?"

      No? That's what I thought. Shut the fuck up.

  6. so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Closed source.

    Proprietary protocol.

    Single client.

    No thanks.

    1. Re:so... by fisted · · Score: 1

      Amen.

  7. Skype is a surveillance tool - Don't use it by Nocturrne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why are people still using this? It's been known to be compromised by the US and Chinese governments for a long time. China even has their own "special" version ffs. https://www.amnesty.org.au/act... http://www.nartv.org/mirror/br... Maybe they realized some people they disagree with are using Linux, so they needed to make a Linux version to gather that additional intel.

    1. Re:Skype is a surveillance tool - Don't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encrypt your Skype traffic with a private VPN then if you are so scared of someone seeing your body parts or the game cheats for Overwatch.

    2. Re:Skype is a surveillance tool - Don't use it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why are people still using this?

      Because when the choice is a surveillance tool for unimportant conversations or not being able to communicate with another party that doesn't use ${one_of_many_other_tools} then just using a default always wins.

      It's why I now use WhatsApp. Not because I was swayed by anything that has happened, but because I moved into a country where it is extensively used and cutting myself off from others based on principle would be more negative than positive.

    3. Re:Skype is a surveillance tool - Don't use it by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      ...cutting myself off from others based on principle would be more negative than positive.

      Practice being a good steward and do not allow others to communicate with you in a manner that puts them in danger.

    4. Re:Skype is a surveillance tool - Don't use it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      that puts them in danger.

      When I talk about the secret plot to overthrow a government I will.

      In the meantime I am practising good stewardship by filling up the the NSA's data troves with pointless garbage like the fact my mother is having problems with the cat peeing on the carpet. ... .Oh but I've said too much.... we're all in danger now.

  8. Thanks but NO Thanks! by Jerry · · Score: 2

    Why should I install Skype (one poster called it spyke) and allow MS to use "Legal Intercept" to spy on my communications, or give that privilege to some gov agent?
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/e...

    It was bad enough when Skype's previous owners burgled Linux users CPU and bandwidth to act as P2P for others communications and left daemons remaining in memory after Skype was shut down! Were they spying too? MS changed the P2P feature to a Linux server farm on which they installed their patented "Legal Intercept" software. If you use Skype you might as well open your Window and shout to the outside while you talk.

    I've moved on to other PRIVATE means of communication. One nice one that works well on my KDE Neon User Edition OS is "Wire".

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re: Thanks but NO Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to use Skype anymore!

    2. Re:Thanks but NO Thanks! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      You do realize that "Legal Intercept" is the same as phone companies (landlines and cell phones both) have had to provide to law enforcement for decades? I'm in favor of end to end encryption too, but it's hardly like a Skype call is worse than picking up the phone and calling someone.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Thanks but NO Thanks! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why should I install Skype (one poster called it spyke) and allow MS to use "Legal Intercept" to spy on my communications, or give that privilege to some gov agent?

      Because people you want to talk to use Skype and nothing else. If you don't have people like that in your social circle then don't install it. It's a communication app. One of very many. There's no killer features it has that others don't. The only real considerations that you should have are:
      a) Do people I know use it i.e. will it actually be useful to have.
      b) Am I plotting a terrorist attack and don't want the government to know.

    4. Re:Thanks but NO Thanks! by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      Voice over copper wires was very strongly protected. It required evidence to support a wire-tap. VOIP and other internet traffic does not have those protections and mass surveillance is the result. Those who want to watch you and your family made sure those protections were removed in laws under the banner of your own protection.

  9. Linux? by ckatko · · Score: 1

    What's a "Skype?" That just sounds like a really shitty, bloated version version of Discord.

    1. Re: Linux? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck off

  10. Re:Dear Developers of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, don't feed the troll, but I'll bite.

    1. Quit astro-turfing. Why are you ignoring all the Windows people complaining about how shitty Windows programs are?? The platform (OS) is irrelevant.

    2. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Sometimes the criticism is valid, other times it is just bitching. Removing feature that were available in a previous version is just dumb.

    3. Unless there is a verified, independent, 3rd party audit of the Linux Skype source only an idiot would "trust" Microsoft.

  11. No, thanks by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    There exist alternatives that I vastly prefer, if it is only because they are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft, I guess you know where you can stick your Skype.

  12. They've been listening... by nowsharing · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We have been listening to you"

    In fact, we've heard everything you've said.

  13. Too Little Too Late by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    Skype has been replaced by chat programs like Slack, and meetings by the much more capable Google Hangouts.

  14. Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I work, we have already ditched Skype. Micro$oft would have to come up with something *much* better before we would even consider the possibility...

    1. Re:Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... For us it will be replaced with "Skype for Business". Even better fun, with the Linux client being a third-party solution, I imagine a lot of fun that will be.

  15. Just in time... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    for everyone to ignore it! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Just in time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for everyone to ignore it! ;)

      You must be referring to the Civil Rights Extremist Movement.

  16. Seriously, who uses Skype these days? by yelvington · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Skype was a big deal back in the day. I can remember holding my laptop up to a window in Paris to steal an unsecured wifi signal and phone home. Wowza! But that was ten years ago. I have dozens of VoIP and video conferencing choices. The world has moved on and Microsoft is the backwater, not the mainstream.

    I spent a week in Ukraine a few months ago and wound up on a three-hour conference call with work back in the US, using Google Voice. (Whether that's progress or not is open to debate.) But I was not concerned about losing the 10-euro credit on my Skype account when I got an expiration notice from the Borg.

    Like the VHS tapes I just hauled off to Goodwill ... I just don't need it any more.

    1. Re:Seriously, who uses Skype these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck convincing hundreds of business contacts to change in mass their main IM system ;-)

    2. Re:Seriously, who uses Skype these days? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      not the mainstream.

      And that's really all that matters now. Skype is utterly useless to me if I have no one to talk to. I now live in a country where EVERYONE uses WhatsApp. I got mocked for sending an SMS when I got here and didn't understand. Then one person handed me her phone and showed me the only thing SMS is used for is receiving 2-factor pins from banks / governments.

      Well that was sorted. I switched to WhatsApp. I also still have Facebook Messenger on my phone for no other reason than some people I talk to have it and not WhatsApp.

      To be honest I do still have Skype too, but I only use it to talk to my mother who tried and failed the complicated switch to Facebook Messenger, and there's an added bonus of some poor NSA agent dying of boredom listening to those conversations.

  17. Skype for arm. by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Well, this one is not only "64-bit" only, it is specifically amd64 only. No arm64, no siree. And I'm typing these words on an armhf laptop.

    Remember that Skype *also has* a web client.
    (And the latest Skype for Linux was basically that skype web-app warped together in a single-package together with google blink and a few key plugins).

    Note: For Audio/Video calls, the web relies on ORTP, Microsoft's own Not-Invented-Here incompatible copy of WebRTC.

    On the positive side, the JSON/XML protocol use by the Skype Web client has been successfully implemented as a Pidgin pluging by Eion Robb ("skypeweb").
    Currently chat works (including group charts).
    Last time I've check, the developer had also being to look for supporting audio/video calls through the same interface as the skype web app.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  18. Circumventing by DrYak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    2 key things :

    - Skype has also a web interface. You can either run into your firefox browser (thus no local daemons). Or use Eion Robb's excellent "skypeweb" plugin for Pidgin / libPurple.
    (And last time I've read about it, this official new Linux client is basically the web app in its own self-contained app)

    - OTR is a message encryption that works over any protocol. It's completely agnostic to the messaging system underneath.
    If you want to avoid your privacy exploded, you could try to use it (but if both of your use non standard client able to run OTR atop of it, you might better switch to another network).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  19. Come on. Use qTox. Help developing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skype alternative is "Tox.chat".

  20. Skype for Business by carbs77 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see an official release of Skype for Business on Linux, there are native alternatives but they either lack features or are somewhat unstable. Mind you Skype for Business on Windows is pretty unstable too.

  21. Skip the OS for web-based by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why they don't just work on improving the web-based version. Works fine for me in Ubuntu/Chrome, it's just lacking features currently.

  22. Re:Dear Developers of the World by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    Don't bother writing any software for linux

    Yes. Don't write any software for linux that is designed to eavesdrop on the user without their knowledge and their consent buried in an EULA.

    I don't want Skype and it disturbs me that I might accidentally use a linux pc with that software installed. Please don't bring Skype to linux in any manner. Amateurs might actually install it.