Slashdot Mirror


FCC Investigating Coast-To-Coast 911 Outage For AT&T Wireless Users (nbcnews.com)

AT&T says it has fixed a nationwide outage that prevented its wireless customers from making 911 emergency calls. "Service has been restored for wireless customers affected by an issue connecting to 911. We apologize to those affected," the company officials said in a statement. The outage was serious enough to gain the attention of the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, said via Twitter that they are investigating what went wrong. NBC News reports: The company didn't say how widespread the outage was, but as reports poured in from across the country, Karima Holmes, director of unified communications for the Washington, D.C., government, said her office had been "advised there is a nationwide outage for AT&T." At 10:20 p.m. ET, about 10 minutes before AT&T gave the all-clear, DownDetector, a site that monitors internet traffic for real-time information on wireless and broadband carriers, indicated that outage reports for AT&T were clustered most prominently around New York City, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Miami, Dallas, Houston, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Seattle. But emergency authorities across the country confirmed 911 outages and publicized direct police, fire and ambulance dispatch telephone numbers that AT&T customers should call in emergencies.

53 comments

  1. Re:From TFA by BronsCon · · Score: 2

    You mean like Windows?

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  2. All across the country? by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...outage reports for AT&T were clustered most prominently around New York City, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Miami, Dallas, Houston, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Seattle...

    For service to be disrupted in cities all across the country in this fashion, either the 911 systems for AT&T are way too centralized to be safe, or this is a coordinated attack on several regional pieces of infrastructure at once (and it exposes a criminal lack of security I'd say). I wonder which way AT&T will want to go with this.

    1. Re:All across the country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because the idea that some manager or developer just mading a bad call on a risky implementation decision is way too simple and obvious an answer.

      We dont take the easy way out here in conspiracy-America

      Lets go for conspiracies and foreigners a.

      Why didn't you also look at the "Attack against Trump" angle by deep state along with sleeper agents for Obama in "Deep State" in concert with Russians and Chinese" ?

      Oh yeah, and radical Islamic Mesican terrorists conspiring with sanctuary cities.

      Oh, and probably aliens. Yes, they were covering an attack by aliens on our way of live on Earth.

      So many conspiracies and opponents. How do you walk down the street each morning knowing everyone is out to get you?

      After all, you probably now consider me some sort of enemy of the state.

      Oh yeah, I forgot the media, surely they have a part to play in preventing this from being reported so the secret takeover last night of the country just looks like a minor telephone issue.

    2. Re:All across the country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      either the 911 systems for AT&T are way too centralized to be safe

      A bad software or routing update could have done this, pushed out to all of their decentralised systems.

    3. Re:All across the country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they will go with the "we contribute more to political campaigns than you so bugger off" defense.

  3. Sigh by buss_error · · Score: 1

    Look, e911 equipment is heavily subsidized by the Federal Government. It is essentially free for the operator to acquire. Likewise it's configuration is fully paid for by the Universal Service Fund charge that's tacked on to every phone bill you get.

    So, it would seem that yet again we see AT&T with their trotters in the pig trough slurping down billions and billions of dollars and providing absolutely nothing they are supposed to do in order to earn those subsidies. I'm *shocked!* Shocked! that AT&T is again failing to do the most rudimentary of tasks that being a monopoly telecommunications provider is encumbered to do. This statement is a personal opinion.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  4. Huge fines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >We apologize to those affected

    That is an unacceptable response to disabling emergency services through negligence.

    This put peoples lives at risk and for all we know people died as a result.

  5. What will be the conclusion? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing the FCC will conclude that the federal emergency services failed and therefor should be privatized, perhaps handled by trustworthy actors such as Trump Emergency Services LLC or Exxon Mobil.

    It's not going to be a monopoly or anything, it's just that they are the only two companies certified by the president to run such an important service.

    Oh, and expect prices to be 'competitive'.

    1. Re: What will be the conclusion? by Entrope · · Score: 4, Informative

      AT&T is already a private company operating the part of 911 services that failed.

      If you're going to threadshit with a political troll, at least put in the effort of not sounding totally ignorant.

    2. Re: What will be the conclusion? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 0

      Emergency services are not restricted to 911 calls.

      If you do not comprehend the text, your first response probably shouldn't be to hit the reply button.

    3. Re: What will be the conclusion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We comprehend your text perfectly. This is in context of AT&T operating 911, again which is privatized. Often times, ambulances are privatized as well. As are many hospitals. In fact, the only ones that aren't are fire and police. Your comment is nothing but a pathetic attempt at trolling, and Entrope was right in calling you out. Your comment was an attempt to create a rise out of people, the definition of a troll, and it was poorly thought out. Try harder next time.

    4. Re: What will be the conclusion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, the only ones that aren't are fire and police.

      In fact, there are private fire and police services.

      Your comment is nothing but a pathetic attempt at trolling, and Entrope was right in calling you out.

      Entrope didn't even succeed in that, but instead went off in an odd direction to lambaste TimothyHollins for ignorance, which just didn't make sense.

      If you're going to complain that somebody else should try harder, you should recognize when another person failed to make much of a case themselves.

    5. Re: What will be the conclusion? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Oh my, did I upset a grumpy trumpie?

    6. Re:What will be the conclusion? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      There are no federal emergency services, with the exception of the US military acting on external threats. "Emergency Services" like police and fire are run on a city/county/on occasion state level (aka State Patrol or State Police). As for privatization, providers of the equipment and telecom for said emergency services department ARE private - such as AT&T in this instance. It isn't the emergency services that are private, it's a private company, AT&T, that is not routing enhanced 911 to the appropriate call centers.

    7. Re: What will be the conclusion? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      But it was 911 that failed - NOT the providers of emergency services such as police, fire, medical.

    8. Re: What will be the conclusion? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      "Private" in terms of fire is difficult to quantify. Where I live, the fire district is (mostly) funded from taxes and none of us make salaries though costs are significant because of the price of equipment and training. However, we are NOT 'town' or 'state' employees, we are volunteers. So it isn't clear whether we are 'public' or 'private' since the fire district is a separate entity from the town.

    9. Re: What will be the conclusion? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Yes, hence it would take a thoroughly corrupt FCC to find fault with the emergency service providers, and an even more corrupt White House to use that for personal gain. While the scenario was a joke and incredibly unlikely, the corruption is in line with previous actions of both Ajit Pai and the White House, and pretty damn frightening to boot.

    10. Re: What will be the conclusion? by Entrope · · Score: 1

      911 calls were what failed, so it's dishonest to bring other emergency services into the discussion. And 911 is provided by local dispatching anyway -- it has essentially nothing to do with the federal government, contrary to your original troll.

    11. Re: What will be the conclusion? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      I'll reiterate, because clearly you didn't get it the first time -

      If you do not comprehend the text, your first response probably shouldn't be to hit the reply button.

      There is no Trump Emergency Services LLC as the very notion that you would run emergency services under a limited liability flag is below all standards of decency even for Satan. Exxon Mobil would never get into the emergency services business, they're an oil company for God's sake. Furthermore, the president does not personally certify emergency service providers. Expect prices to be 'competitive' when I just stated it would be a monopoly? How can you miss *any* of those things?

      That you wouldn't immediately see this as snark or satire directed at the severe level of corruption displayed by both Ajit Pai and the White House is downright frightening, but I guess you had to disable your sanity-checker in order to vote for Trump with a clean conscience.

    12. Re: What will be the conclusion? by Entrope · · Score: 1

      I understood perfectly. You look even more like a troll with your lame theater-of-outrage schtick.

    13. Re: What will be the conclusion? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      If you understood even a little you wouldn't have been so off the mark, *twice* to boot. Are you by any chance Kellyanne Conway?

    14. Re: What will be the conclusion? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Nothing, but nothing has been discussed about emergency services providers being an issue. You're more likely to find this under a CLinton presidency because - surprise! - cops, firemen, and EMTs tend to be white men.

    15. Re: What will be the conclusion? by Entrope · · Score: 1

      We have a one-word name for off-topic "snark" that is based on alternative facts: trolling. If you don't want to be called out for it, don't be so bad at it.

  6. Coast-to-Coast ??? by cstacy · · Score: 1

    "Coast-to-Coast" ???

    You mean ALIENS did it?

  7. I got a text alert by cstacy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When this happened here in the D.C. area, I immediately got an SMS from the police about it,
    and giving the regular non-911 number in case you needed it.

    (Actually, got several of these alerts (DC-MD-VA), and also the service restoration announcement.)

    1. Re:I got a text alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also happened in my county, county EMS posted it to twitter. I found out this morning after it was resolved.

  8. Re:Coast-to-Coast ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. John B. Wells was the perp.

  9. Re:Coast-to-Coast ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, Space Ghost did it.

  10. Where are the huge fines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My city runs its own POTS telephone network, and when they had a 2 hours, city-wide outage of the entire network that, of course, also happened to disable access to 911 (duh, no phone = no 911), they were fined $1.6 million by the FCC. That was $200 per capita.

    So... by my calculation, AT&T ought to probably pay somewhere on the order of $20 Billion.

    1. Re:Where are the huge fines? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Too big to fail. AT&T is already bigger than they were in the 1980s when the feds broke them up.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  11. Useless Regulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    911 service is just another useless regulation that needs to be removed in order to allow mobile carriers to innovate. 911 services currently have a government-enforced and government-controlled monopoly on emergency-response services. The government has been undercutting the private sector in this major market for far too long, and it needs to stop. Lifting outdated regulations like mandatory 911 service opens up a market for wireless carriers to provide their own, private emergency-response services. Private companies can always deliver services in a better, cheaper way. It's time to eliminate this legacy, ineffectual, and demonstrably ineffective regulation from an industry that is barely surviving under the weight of government regulations. AT&T's outage shows just how badly this system needs to be eliminated.

    Pai's investigation will certainly come to the same conclusion.

  12. FCC will say this outage was good for consumers by billrp · · Score: 1

    FCC now lives in the world of alternative facts

  13. Re:From TFA by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "One of the Linux servers was attacked by unknown hackers."

    The 911 service really should be backed by something more reliable than the cheapest option...

    Surely you mean it should be run on the most reliable OS (Linux) and subject to regular security reviews and penetration tests

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  14. It's Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relax guys, Windows 10 decided to do upgrades (because it's so smart, def more so than both me and you, who have only used PC's 15+yrs), it restarted itself (because of earlier mentioned superior intelligence), but then forgot to fix the 911 dialing. Could happen to anyone

  15. really hard to test by freddieb · · Score: 1

    You really can't test for 911 without calling. They get quite perturbed if you call and tell them your just testing.

    1. Re:really hard to test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't get perturbed if you call them and tell them your testing. It's standard practice to test phones that autocall 911. They just prefer you call them on their non-emergency line first, and notify them of the time you're going to do the test. This also applies to testing fire alarms.

  16. Nothing to see here by Miser · · Score: 1

    Pai will do something about it?

    I doubt that! This will be swept under rug, hands slapped, etc.

    1. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's crazy that people expect to be able to call 911 any time they want, especially from something as obscure as a cell phone. What a bunch of divas.

  17. Re:From TFA by Rockoon · · Score: 2

    Surely you mean it should be run on the most reliable OS (BSD) and subject to regular security reviews and penetration tests

    Fixed that for you, fanboy.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  18. Re:Coast-to-Coast ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illegally, no doubt. Like all aliens are

  19. Re:From TFA by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Fair play

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Reliable? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I'd name OpenVMS, AS/400, and AIX as being more reliable than Linux.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Reliable? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      SYSTEM360, baby!

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Reliable? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      But what if I want my fork operations to be thread safe.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  22. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not the problem. The problem is for critical infrastructure you need to fail over across datacenters quickly.

  23. Who audits the e911 network? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    When I worked for an FDIC insured bank, our network and systems were audited by the Office of Thrift Supervision.

    If the federal government is subsidizing e911 - is there an agency that audits that spending and the network?

    1. Re:Who audits the e911 network? by DonaId+Trump · · Score: 1

      If the federal government is subsidizing e911 - is there an agency that audits that spending and the network?

      Here's the thing, folks, some really smart people are saying the federal government DID subsidize 9/11. Regular 9/11 was bad enough, I don't want an e-9/11 on my watch, folks. My cyber experts, Barron Trump and Rudy Giuliani, and by the way they're great cyberers, Steve Bannon has told me these two are the best at cybering, they're going to make sure any attempt at e-9/11 doesn't succeed, believe me!

    2. Re:Who audits the e911 network? by buss_error · · Score: 1

      is there an agency that audits that spending and the network?

      It depends on where the funds are disbursed from. For telecoms, it's the FCC (Ajit pai). For other entities, that is the state or federal agency. Example, schools would be the Department of Education (Nancy DeVos) or the specific state's education agency. For law enforcement, it's a mix of the FCC and DHS.

      But the important thing to keep in mind is that these audits are financial, not technical. I've never been (when I was involved with it) audited for anything but what equipment was purchased, where it was located, how it was inventoried and tracked. I never once was asked "Is it working? What does the technical configuration and implementation look like? What is your operational testing and monitoring look like?"

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  24. Verizon affected earlier this week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not certain they are connected but the timing seems suspicious.

    http://www.ksby.com/story/34690973/verizon-mum-on-cause-of-911-outage

  25. Busy day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They took down our private frame relay yesterday as well. It was a busy day for them.