Slashdot Mirror


Ancient Technique Can Dramatically Improve Memory, Research Suggests (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: After spending six weeks cultivating an internal "memory palace," people more than doubled the number of words they could retain in a short time period and their performance remained impressive four months later. The technique, which involves conjuring up vivid images of objects in a familiar setting, is credited to the Greek poet Simonides of Ceos, and is a favored method among so-called memory athletes. The study also revealed that after just 40 days of training, people's brain activity shifted to more closely resemble that seen in some of the world's highest ranked memory champions, suggesting that memory training can alter the brain's wiring in subtle but powerful ways. The study, published in the journal Neuron, recruited 23 of the 50 top-scoring memory athletes in an annual contest called the World Memory Championships. The athletes were given 20 minutes to recall a list of 72 random nouns and they scored, on average, nearly 71 of the 72 words. By contrast, an untrained control group recalled an average of 26 words. This group then followed a daily 30-minute training regime where they practiced walking through a chosen familiar environment, such as their own home, and placing objects in specific locations. After 40 days of 30-minute training sessions, the participants who had average memory skills at the start more than doubled their memory capacity, recalling 62 words on average -- and four months later, without continued training, they could remember 48 words from a list of 72.

190 comments

  1. PI is 3 point something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If I want more decimal places, I can google it.

    1. Re:PI is 3 point something by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh ya, google. I spent all day trying to remember that name of the search engine I wanted to use..

    2. Re:PI is 3 point something by ls671 · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant. Some people waste time remembering phone numbers. Well, I guess it is OK if it makes them have some exercise for their brain.

      Remembering vibes, faces and in short; "the big picture" is seldom seen.

      There is a distinction between the two.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re:PI is 3 point something by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      If I want more decimal places, I can google it.

      Yeah, the thing about that:

      https://twitter.com/Doug_Lemov...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:PI is 3 point something by Nethead · · Score: 2

      Well, son, there was a time before memory dialers. I still remember phone numbers of friends from when I was in school some 45 years ago, and our first phone number, CHestnut8-2354 from 52 years ago. Helped me later with IP numbers. One of my co-workers calls me the walking DNS. "Hey Joe, I need a block of 8 IPs for the Newport site." "Here you go, now send me an email so I don't forget to put them in on the sheet. I'm busy eating dinner."

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re:PI is 3 point something by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      If I want more decimal places, I can google it.

      Going this way, in a not so far future you may not even remember the name "google", and you can't even google it..

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    6. Re:PI is 3 point something by davester666 · · Score: 1

      googling pie just makes me hungry.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re: PI is 3 point something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not at your level but I can still remember my account number and every phone number I had before smart phones became a thing.

      For those to young to remember, back in the day if you wanted to withdrawal money from your account you needed to fill out a slip of paper with your information and account number with the amount you wished to withdrawal before you got to the teller.

    8. Re:PI is 3 point something by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If I want more decimal places, I can google it.

      "How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy chapters involving quantum mechanics."

    9. Re:PI is 3 point something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy chapters involving quantum mechanics."

      The nice thing is that it is quite impressive when you use it: folks think you're doing very complicated calculations in your head while you're just counting letters.

      Captcha: dungeons -- cool, I've always wanted that one.

    10. Re: PI is 3 point something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's a paper, and also why would you "withdrawal money"? is teller like when you get to the front of the line at Starbucks? so confused

    11. Re:PI is 3 point something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the url bar doubles as a portal to google search so you really dont even have to remember the URL or even that its called google, you just have to remember what the "internet" icon looks like and to start typing at some point and you will probably end up doing a search. Before long Google search will kick in ANY time you type anything

    12. Re:PI is 3 point something by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, I can remember all my old phone numbers, and all the numbers of all my old friends as kids...

      I couldn't tell you my current work phone number though- or even what zip code the office is in without googling it.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    13. Re:PI is 3 point something by gnick · · Score: 1

      Pi is 22/7. Anyone who tells you differently is selling something.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    14. Re:PI is 3 point something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i kinda scares me that if i ever lost my phone i literally couldn't contact anyone since i don't have their numbers memorized.

    15. Re:PI is 3 point something by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I hear ya. I can remember the phone number of my daughter just because it's only a few numbers off of my cell phone. The rest of them, no way, I never have to dial them.
      There were some numbers that I couldn't actually tell you without dialing them on a TouchTone pad, they actually became muscle memory.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    16. Re:PI is 3 point something by imnotanumber · · Score: 1

      Pi is 22/7. Anyone who tells you differently is selling something.

      You have to remember 3 digits: 2,2 and 7 plus the "/" to get three digits right from pi...

      22/7 = 3.142857142857142857142857(142857) while the

      real pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795...

      Does't look like a good deal...

    17. Re:PI is 3 point something by gnick · · Score: 1

      22/7 is a marginally better estimate than 3.14 (~.04% vs ~.05%), both at the "cost" of remembering 3 digits. Are you suggesting that it's easier to remember "." than "/"? Not sure where you're going with this.

      I remember out to 3.14159, but that's wasted space and I'm not sure how those wasted digits snuck in there. Either 3-digit estimate is good enough for just about everything you're likely to run into.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    18. Re:PI is 3 point something by imnotanumber · · Score: 1

      22/7 is a marginally better estimate than 3.14 (~.04% vs ~.05%), both at the "cost" of remembering 3 digits. Are you suggesting that it's easier to remember "." than "/"? Not sure where you're going with this.

      Both have, more or less, the same the difficulty to remember. The "22/7'" disadvantage is that you still have to perform the division to have the value while 3.14 already is the number.

      I remember out to 3.14159, but that's wasted space and I'm not sure how those wasted digits snuck in there. Either 3-digit estimate is good enough for just about everything you're likely to run into.

      I remember also 3.14159.

      Of course, when you are in a situation where you need more digits. (I faced moments like that...) you probably already have the tools to fetch an approximation with more digits...

    19. Re:PI is 3 point something by gnick · · Score: 1

      Of course, when you are in a situation where you need more digits. (I faced moments like that...) you probably already have the tools to fetch an approximation with more digits...

      That's what I was thinking. If you're in a situation where you care about the difference between 22/7, 3.14, and pi, you're probably using a tool that can help you with more digits than you need. To quote the OP:

      If I want more decimal places, I can google it.

      What were you doing that needed more than 3 digits? Orbits?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  2. Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I really want to remember whats going on these days

    1. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Happy Breed", by John Sladek

      tl;dr: machines try to maximise human happiness and humanity ended up in jars full of fluid, blissfully asleep.

    2. Re: Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it a warm fluid like the shower? I'd be pretty happy standing in the shower forever, peeing whenever I needed. Nothing better than peeing in the shower while you bask in the hot water. I even bring my coffee in sometimes.

    3. Re: Not sure by Notabadguy · · Score: 0

      Is it a warm fluid like the shower? I'd be pretty happy standing in the shower forever, peeing whenever I needed. Nothing better than peeing in the shower while you bask in the hot water. I even bring my coffee in sometimes.

      Try a cold beer sometime.

    4. Re: Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you've never had sex because I assure you it trumps a warm shower every time. Unless you are having sex in a warm shower that is.

    5. Re: Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So sex trumps warm shower, unless you're having sex in a warm shower, then for some reason the warm shower trumps sex?

      Shower sex -- you're doing it wrong.

    6. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also try Gray Matters by William Hjortsberg.

  3. Yes, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just as described in the books about Hannibal ( Silence of the Lambs...).

    Mnemonics at its purest, and hardly worthy of a post, except that many millenials need this.

  4. Spelling Bee Champions Hate It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    1 weird ancient secret could get you a free gift card per year! Click my ass to find out how.

    1. Re:Spelling Bee Champions Hate It by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      I did this and submitted my email address. I shall be waiting on my well deserved prizes

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  5. Familiar Environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What if you don't remember your own home well enough to place the things to be remembered? Cities have lots of complexity and sensory input for which the people living in them adapt by filtering the non-essential information like places which are accessible and safe enough to not requiring to be remembered.

    1. Re:Familiar Environments by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I use the fourth Doctor's TARDIS.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re: Familiar Environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if your house is already really cluttered and there isn't space to put imaginary things around what's already there? Would you have to put your imaginary things in your tidy friend's house, and would they object?

    3. Re:Familiar Environments by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What if you don't remember your own home well enough to place the things to be remembered?

      Is this some sort of humblebrag that you live in Buckingham Palace or Versailles?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re: Familiar Environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't always remember where I put things in my real house, but maybe I can create a reminder in my imaginary house to remind me of where they are in the physical one. If I forget where the reminders are in the imaginary one I can just create a second imaginary one with a meta-reminder. It's memory palaces all the way down....

    5. Re: Familiar Environments by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      lol, Well played AC.

    6. Re: Familiar Environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Mnemosheption!

    7. Re:Familiar Environments by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I figured it meant a different cardboard box every night

  6. One weird trick to improve memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously though, they taught us this in Dale Carnegie training. It's nothing new.

    1. Re: One weird trick to improve memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which aspect of the word 'ancient' is causing you consternation?

    2. Re: One weird trick to improve memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Which aspect of the word 'ancient' is causing you consternation?

      As a wizard with a palantir who knows that Sauron is not defeatable, The "ent" part causes me grave consternation.

    3. Re:One weird trick to improve memory... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Yep I learnt it over 20 years ago along with several other memory techniques. I still find it useful for when there isn't a more convenient way of recording a list. They was vital for cramming for exams where for example actually being able to remember the periodic table and details of each element certainly gave me an advantage. After I'd been using the techniques for a while I found my natural memory improved significantly too.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    4. Re:One weird trick to improve memory... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      They was vital

      They didn't help much with my grammar or proof reading skills though :D

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  7. This does not show that your memory is improved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The study also revealed that after just 40 days of training, people's brain activity shifted to more closely resemble that seen in some of the world's highest ranked memory champions, suggesting that memory training can alter the brain's wiring in subtle but powerful ways"

    No, this study shows that once you really learn how to do this trick, you can remember how to do this trick 4 months later.

  8. a classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one seems to circulate in popularity from time to time. It's a method of anchoring to existing memories that I remember from back in the 70's.

    The two versions I remember was from a guy that was famous for his memory. He would visualize walking through the block he grew up on and placing information in specific spots. The second was a version that you train yourself to visualize playing cards on different parts of your body, then anchor the information to each of the cards.

    1. Re: a classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used the hallway in my childhood home to place shopping lists. I filled it with ridiculous images, to remember buying milk, meat and candy for instance I pictured having to force myself past a gigantic milk-soaked candy bag sitting on a slab of meat covering the entire floor.
      I am worthless at remembering names, but making up pictures representing them helps.
      I use an old apartment with an interesting circular layout for remembering most other one-shot lists. I still remember parts of a list from the book I read on these techniques several years ago, and I would still remember all of it if I hadn't used the location for other lists since. It's really a hack for using the kind of memory we're best at for storing other things.

    2. Re: a classic by Nethead · · Score: 1

      This is why places can be so powerful for us, the anchor memories. Have you ever gone back to your home town after many years away? Man the stuff that starts coming back.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re: a classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They took all the trees
      And put them in a tree museum
      Then they charged the people
      A dollar and a half just to see 'em
      Don't it always seem to go,
      That you don't know what you've got
      Til it's gone
      They paved paradise
      And put up a parking lot

    4. Re: a classic by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Touche'

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re: a classic by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Better would be smells, they can trigger instant total recall.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  9. Practical use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can write down 72 random nouns in far less than 20 minutes, and my computer can memorize every noun in every language in far less than 20 minutes.
    If there's some ancient technique that, say, dramatically improves your ability to make logical correlations between events or data that a machine can't process, that might be worth several weeks of brain training.

    1. Re: Practical use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, how useful is random total recall when I only need the fuzzy high level stuff to go look up the rest?

  10. Re:remembering the search engine name. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Try Bing, it has less letters so there's more room to remember other important things like Brawndo is what plants crave. But seriously, you can earn points redeemable for things like Microsoft or Amazon gift cards.

  11. the "ancient technique" is practicing by locopuyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're practicing remembering things for 30 minutes every day for 40 days. It isn't some sort of "weird trick" like the headline might make you think.

    1. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      It isn't some sort of "weird trick" like the headline might make you think.

      The editors don't want you to know!

    2. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      It is a weird trick, and how "the trick" basically works is right in the summary. Facepalm.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      The secret to remembering is...eh...thingy....

    4. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      Yeah practicing memorizing is so weird. I saw some school kids using flash cards then the next day they passed the test! So weird.

    5. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're practicing remembering things for 30 minutes every day for 40 days. It isn't some sort of "weird trick" like the headline might make you think.

      Wonder if there is a weird ancient trick for improving your reading comprehension.

    6. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the first time I heared about flash cards I was nearly finished with school.
      Actually no one ever told me that you can 'prepare' for a test. So I never did that until 13th grade. And later in university ofc. Except for languages I had no problems in school, though.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      They're practicing remembering things for 30 minutes every day for 40 days. It isn't some sort of "weird trick" like the headline might make you think.

      That's an interesting hypothesis. However, we don't have data one way or the other. Another study would have to be done evaluating the "Memory Place" technique, versus simple practice.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    8. Re:the "ancient technique" is practicing by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      They're practicing remembering things for 30 minutes every day for 40 days. It isn't some sort of "weird trick" like the headline might make you think.

      Not only that, it really doesn't improve the memory that is most useful; i.e. the ability to recall information relevant to hat you are working on. If it enables you to memorize say a set of legal precedents and then recall later the exact one you need and be able to recite it verbatim or go to a specific paragraph in a document and remember it it would be useful. From TFA it wasn't even clear if the could recall what was the 4th word or just some subset of all the words. I use something similar when teaching. I "memorize" the names of 30 or so students on the first day so I can call on them by name. A colleague was impressed until I told her it was a parlor trick; I didn't really remember their names but the position of their names relative to each other and objects in the room. I knew John sat next to the purple lamp because I could visualize a john with a purple lamp in the bowl being held by Susan next to him and so forth. If they didn't sit in the same seats I was screwed, fortunately students tend to occupy the same seat every time. If I saw them outside of class I often did not remember their name because I could not recall it in a useful way, i.e. associated with their face.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  12. Standard Deviants videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was a comedy troupe that cut a bunch of VHS tapes on elementary technical subjects (high school and college). The actors would occasionally rattle off the kind of "points to remember" listed at the end of a textbook chapter, but interspersed with wacky Monte Python type stuff. I bet some attention-challenged college students still use it, but after you've learned how to study you don't need this kind of crutch any more.

  13. Improved Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I go to slashdot.org everyday for the last 40 days, I still can't remember what this article is about.

  14. Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone taught me Giordano Bruno's "memory palace" technique when I was a freshman at uchicago, and it made everything about my academic career as student and teacher so much easier. If you don't know what that is, you really ought to look it up.

    The story of Giordano Bruno is a ripping yarn, too. He was a mathematician, astronomer, poet, and theorist in the 16th century. He was also a Dominican friar. He was one of the guys who came up with the "infinite universe" theory and the notion that the Earth was not really stationary with the heavens moving around it. He was a brilliant dude, but had absolutely no patience for people not as smart as him. Even so, the Church tried to move him around, to Oxford, to Rome, to France, hoping he'd find a place where he couldn't upset too many people.

    He's one of the few people in history to have been excommunicated from three different religions, including one that he wasn't even a member of. Yes, he was actually preemptively excommunicated.

    His love of learning and his obsessive reading finally did him in. See, he liked to read while on the crapper,, like most of us, and he kept a well-worn copy of poems of Erasmus behind his toilet. So, when the Pope's men came for him, they found the Erasmus, and since it was "forbidden" by the Church, that pretty much was the end. Even then, they'd have let him go if he'd just have recanted his notion that Earth wasn't the only "world" in the universe. Not being able to abide stupid people, he told them to go fuck themselves. Then, they tried and convicted him of a host of thought-crimes, from heresy to occult practices to general mopery.

    They burned him at the stake in 1600.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Memory Palace by Required+Snark · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In the highly regarded fantasy novel Little, Big by Robert Crowley, the character Ariel Hawksquill uses Bruno's memory palace technique. It allows her to perform divination by remembering things she never knew about in the first place.

      It's a wonderful book to read and has many places where the mundane world becomes intertwined with the world of magic. You might enjoy it if you liked Tolkien. However, it has no grand "save the world" plot, no epic battles and no iconic figures of good and evil. It's about people at the edge of a magical realm, and how this status changes them in both helpful and hurtful ways.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    2. Re: Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a slight twist of this idea I call "mammary palace"

    3. Re: Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Memory palace is just one of MANY memory techniques, good over view here https://www.coursera.org/learn/learning-how-to-learn

    4. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So "Someone" that you can't remember taught you this great memory technique?

    5. Re: Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People never want to leave that place and get forcibly removed.

    6. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice tip, thanks. Tolkien didn't really make up a great deal, most of his stuff is lifted from things like the Edda. He just had the advantage of being an excellent scholar of languages, and had access to these old tales before the English speaking public knew about them.

    7. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >They burned him at the stake in 1600.
      And yet we still have to deal with those idiots.

    8. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Giordano Bruno did not come up with the "infinite universes" theory. That idea is basically as old as humanity, but Bruno himself got it from Nicholas of Cusa (Cusanus), who was a highly regarded cardinal. The idea is not, and was never, considered heretical and it was not one of the reasons that Bruno was burned.

    9. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Giordano Bruno did not come up with the "infinite universes" theory. That idea is basically as old as humanity, but Bruno himself got it from Nicholas of Cusa (Cusanus), who was a highly regarded cardinal.

      The difference is that Cusanus believed the universe was infinite because God was infinite and Bruno just thought the universe was infinite because it was. Unlike other scientist/clerics of his time, he didn't necessarily feel the need to couch his theories in language that would make the "Religious Right" of the Church at that time feel better.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the new Cosmos show lied to you. Few quick things:
      His infinite universe theory was basically God is Infinite therefore the universe is. Not really scientific.
      They burned him at the stake because he was a Friar, a religious figure, running around saying that Jesus was not divine. (along with several other core Catholic tenants)
       
      Also he didn't come up with the "memory palace" he was using "method of loci" which has been around since Ancient Greek times.

    11. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruno was not a scientist.

    12. Re:Memory Palace by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Someone taught me Giordano Bruno's "memory palace" technique when I was a freshman at uchicago, and it made everything about my academic career as student and teacher so much easier. If you don't know what that is, you really ought to look it up.

      From the summary " The technique, which involves conjuring up vivid images of objects in a familiar setting, is credited to the Greek poet Simonides of Ceos, and is a favored method among so-called memory athletes".

      If this is the same thing- this would be too foreign for me. I actually have a better-than-average memory, but I can't "picture things".

      It's as foreign as when people talk about "picture your happy place in your mind", I can't picture things in my mind. I couldn't visualize a house to place objects in to help me remember them because I can't visualize. The only time I've visualized anything was in dreams- and I haven't even remembered having a dream since I was a child.

      I don't know if I'm odd- or if there are just different people that have brains that function differently. I'm not sure if I have some sort of brain damage- I've always done well academically and on IQ tests, etc, I'm good at spatial problems despite my lack of ability to "visualize". I suspect these "memory palaces" wouldn't work on someone like me who can't conjure images in his head.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    13. Re:Memory Palace by freedom4us · · Score: 1

      Thank you for sharing this information, looks informative.

    14. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not "Bruno's memory palace technique"...

    15. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Bruno was not a scientist.

      He lectured in mathematics at Oxford and barely missed out on becoming the chair of mathematics at Padua (to Galileo) because of political reasons, so yeah, he was a scientist.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If this is the same thing- this would be too foreign for me. I actually have a better-than-average memory, but I can't "picture things".

      This is very interesting. I've never heard anyone say this before. If you think about your mother's face (or dog, or the Apple logo), do you not conjure a picture?

      If I asked you to draw the symbol for infinity, in the moment before you start to move the pen on paper, do you not "see" the symbol? Could you describe a giraffe without looking at a picture?

      Either way, I'm glad you've been able to succeed despite your perceived perception problem.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Memory Palace by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I know what my mother's face looks like, I know what an Apple logo looks like. I can't literally picture them in my head though. I can't create an image of them in my head, I have no problem recognizing them though. I can certainly draw an infinity symbol- I can't picture one. I could describe a giraffe, but no, I don't see it before describing it- it's purely academic, I know a giraffe is orangey with pale lines between blotches and a long neck with two hairy horns on top of it's head.

      (I didn't realise anyone could visualize until a few years ago- I thought when people were told to visualize things it was purely a theoretical experience where you think about a place or object).

      The only reason I ever realised that people actually see pictures in their head was discussing a book with the wife one day she was talking about an image the scene portrayed to her and I asked her "why", she said it was just what she saw in her head. From there the conversation progressed and I realized people actually "see things" in their head. Mind's eye wasn't just a metaphor for a thought construct. Suddenly things like "counting sheep" and "seeing people's faces when they close their eyes" made a little more sense.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    18. Re:Memory Palace by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

      I am the same way. As a teen, trying to get to sleep, I would sometimes try to imagine a swinging pendulum, but the visualization would fall apart after just a few swings. I have a terrible visualization ability, and actually do much better when I describe things in words than in pictures. As a mechanical engineer, this makes me very much an odd duck compared to my peers who, by and large, see and manipulate 3D objects in their brains all the time. You are not alone!

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    19. Re:Memory Palace by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

      For me, trying to visualize things brings only very brief, half-formed flashes before it's just blank again. Almost as if I begin to visualize, and then am introspecting the process too much and it dissipates.

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    20. Re:Memory Palace by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I wonder if your thought process- remember things as concepts rather than images actually helped you become a mechanical engineer. If it, being a physical science thinking in words and concepts is more useful that picturing things. (cuts out some of the distraction).

      I'm a web developer- so thinking in concepts probably helps my coding- but it makes me wonder if I would be better at aesthetics if I could picture moving things around in my head. I tend to think of laying things out by golden ratio, and mimicking what looks good elsewhere.

      Strangely enough- I do remember that my dreams as a child contained a visual element, so I can kind of think what having a minds-eye might be like. I probably even had one myself when I was small and I've just forgot about having one.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    21. Re:Memory Palace by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "Memory palace" and "method of loci" are exactly the same thing. The techniques were used by the Ancient Greeks but they were not the originators of this method.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    22. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      For me, trying to visualize things brings only very brief, half-formed flashes before it's just blank again. Almost as if I begin to visualize, and then am introspecting the process too much and it dissipates.

      Too bad Oliver Sacks is gone. I bet he would have liked a look at your noggin.

      I'm unable to visualize not being able to visualize. I guess the variations in human consciousness are pretty vast.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    23. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, if you don't mind me asking: Can you "hear" music in your head? If I were to name a song that you like, could you summon it in memory?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:Memory Palace by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, if you don't mind me asking: Can you "hear" music in your head? If I were to name a song that you like, could you summon it in memory?

      Kind of, but only music. It's an interesting question one I haven't thought about, that people hear things in their head differently to me too. I can't re-hear birds or car engines running, or any random sounds, or usually people's voices (although I sort-of can sometimes).

      When I "hear" music in my head, it's more I feel the beat and I find myself subconsciously altering my breathing to mimic the notes in a tune. I don't hear the singer-singing, it's my internal voice singing- or at least what I internalize my voice to be, but I do hear melody- but I have to adjust my breathing to hear it (if that makes any sense).

      The more I think about it (I've never really thought about it before), I guess, when I hear music in my head, I'm probably not hearing it like others, it's not like hearing it on the radio and replaying it internally (assuming that's how others hear music in their head). I'm experiencing more the properties of the music than the music itself, if that makes sense. That's a lot like how I visualize things, if I need to fit x object in y space I think- "okay, there is a nub on the left, so when I turn it over it will be on the right". I'm not actually seeing the picture of object x, but I'm thinking about it's properties.

      I do get songs stuck in my head, when I get an "ear-worm" it's the beat and the lyrics that get stuck in my head- but it's almost like it's me singing in my head.

      I probably look strange when I am "hearing" music in my head because I find myself moving my head slightly to the "beat" and my breathing must look/sound erratic as I adjust my vocal chords in my breathing for the tone.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    25. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do get songs stuck in my head, when I get an "ear-worm" it's the beat and the lyrics that get stuck in my head- but it's almost like it's me singing in my head.

      That's mostly how other people experience it to. Granted it's a spectrum, but for the most part, seeing images in one's head and hearing sounds isn't exactly like an interior television or radio. They rarely so vivid are glimpses that are difficult to hold onto.

      I have a slightly different problem. I can visualize, but it's difficult for me to focus and direct my visualization (I have a very active imagination). For example, counting sheep is extremely frustrating to me because I can't force the sheep to sequentially jump the fence. The "movie" won't play how I'm asking it to and my mind wanders or starts feeling claustrophobic

    26. Re:Memory Palace by epine · · Score: 1

      Yes, he was actually preemptively excommunicated.

      Damn! I so much want to add that one to my bucket list, but then it would almost kill me to have to cross it off.

      1. have sex
      2. have sex again

      So here's my big question: can you make bucket list items out of sheep's intestine? Cause I'd want to reuse this one a lot.

    27. Re:Memory Palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more like the parent here. I can visualize, but it's usually glimpses. It's hard keep a given image in my head with great clarity for very long

    28. Re:Memory Palace by epine · · Score: 1

      Our Lady of Potted Fern Beside Left-Rear 5.1 Don't Fail Me Now:

      [_] Robert Crowley (printer)
      [_] Robert Crowley (CIA)
      [_] Bob Crowley (Survivor contestant)
      [_] it's a trap

    29. Re:Memory Palace by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Math teachers aren't scientists, though nothing is stopping a scientist from teaching math.

    30. Re:Memory Palace by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Ah, now it makes sense; you don't understand the word "picture" in the sentence, "picture it in your head."

      You're just getting hung up over the word and then pretending you can't do the thing, instead of accepting that the word means the thing that you're insisting on calling a "thought construct."

    31. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Math teachers aren't scientists, though nothing is stopping a scientist from teaching math.

      A math professor is more than just a teacher. They're expected to publish original work (Bruno did) and do research (Bruno did). And this was the 16th century. There were no "senior lecturers" the way we have today who teach a subject but do no work in the subject.

      Was Galileo a scientist? If so, then Bruno was most certainly a scientist. They were peers, who reviewed each other's work.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    32. Re:Memory Palace by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Math professors are not doing "research" except in a very few exceptional cases. What a load of hooey.

      And the scientific method didn't exist yet, so Bruno didn't publish any science. I don't doubt he did research, or that he was a Natural Philosopher. But that doesn't make him a scientist, nor does it make math a science.

      There are reasons for the phrase, "math and science." No, it isn't redundant.

    33. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Let me take 'em one at a time.

      And the scientific method didn't exist yet

      Of course it did.

      so Bruno didn't publish any science

      Not only did he publish, but his work was peer-reviewed.

      I don't doubt he did research, or that he was a Natural Philosopher. But that doesn't make him a scientist

      Yes, it does. If Galileo is a scientist, if Copernicus was a scientist, if fucking Isaac Newton was a scientist, then so was Giordano Bruno.

      nor does it make math a science.

      Karl Popper, who has written the most cogent definition of science, originally thought as you do. He was wrong, as he later admitted. Popper concluded that "most mathematical theories are, like those of physics and biology, hypothetico-deductive: pure mathematics therefore turns out to be much closer to the natural sciences whose hypotheses are conjectures, than it seemed even recently." Imre Lakatos has gone so far as to have now applied Popper's theory of falsification to mathematics. Math is not only a science, but it's THE science.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Memory Palace by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You wave your hands and say "of course," but you didn't even look it up. I stopped reading there, no point in reading your blah-blah that you're making up as you type it if you're not going to bother to look up what you're disagreeing with to check if maybe it was actually correct. ;)

    35. Re:Memory Palace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You wave your hands and say "of course," but you didn't even look it up.

      If you have to look it up, then you just don't know. The scientific method goes back to the Bacon brothers, Roger, Francis and Kevin.

      You can trace it to the 13th century and even earlier.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    36. Re:Memory Palace by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you have to look it up, you didn't know.

      If you did look it up, you do know.

      If you thought you didn't need to look it up, you think you know but I'm not convinced even a little bit.

  15. First you have to be able to imagine the palace by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then you have to remember where you put stuff.

    I have a hard enough time remembering where I put real things.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by arcade · · Score: 2

      I'm in the same boat. I've tried teaching myself this technique, but fail every time. I can't remember the "familiar place", and I can't call up vivid imagery when I close my eyes.

      There was a writeup on Aphantasia making the rounds a while ago: https://www.facebook.com/notes...

      It's quite a good read. :-)

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    2. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by quenda · · Score: 1

      I have a hard enough time remembering where I put real things.

      Try closing your eyes and picturing your home/office. Imagine yourself putting the thing away. Where did you put it?
      The memory palace technique can be modified for real things.

    3. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by queBurro · · Score: 3, Funny

      I used to use the route I walked my dog, putting 'objects' at points along the way. Derren Brown wrote a book covering it, I forget which book it was though.

      --
      sag
    4. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Oh I do this all the time when I forget the shop list yet I've gone shopping, I just kinda stand still, lean against something, imagine I'm looking in the fridge, cupboards, bathroom, cabinets etc and identify the places for each item and then try to remember how much is left.

      I generally end up getting most of the stuff on the list.

    5. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well for me, I can't picture anything if i close my eyes, that's the whole point.

      This technique probably doesn't work for people who have a more abstract imagination / internal brain state, contrary to people who have mental imagery or internal visualisation (yes, both kind of people exist, and they probably ignore that the other kind is possible).

    6. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The memory palace technique can be modified for real things.

      What? No, that's not the memory palace technique. That's just called remembering.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be even better if you imagine your dog putting "objects" at points along the way.

    8. Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace by BundesSheep · · Score: 1

      Same here. I have aphantasia, too, and had no idea I had it. I thought people were being figurative when they would tell me to visualize something. Trying the memory palace technique never worked for me, although I was one of those nerds that memorized pi to 100+ digits just for the hell of it.

  16. Learn code easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to know how to learn a new codebase quickly. I want to easily learn that the function to do a certain task is in this file, which is in this folder.

    Also I want to know how to easily learn Ruby on Rails. I want to easily learn that in order to change your web page in a certain way, you have to make this change to this RoR file, and also that change to that RoR file.

    1. Re:Learn code easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing to learn is how to program. The scales fall from your eyes as you realize that coding web apps is shit work for fucking idiots.

    2. Re:Learn code easily by Nethead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That just takes two things, practice and obsession.

      People often ask me how to "get into" computers, as in getting into IT. My answer is that if you're not already "into" computers, then it's too late. Oh you might take a class and get a help desk job, but if you really want to do computers and haven't been dumpster diving for them, well then you just don't have it.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:Learn code easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if you are genuinely "into" computers, you will find there aren't any jobs out there. Absolutely none. Because employers don't want enthusiasm. Employers want mediocrity, and the stupider the better.

      I went on a job interview for a network engineering job where I explained my passion for computer networking by describing how I built my own IPX router out of spare parts and wrote the routing software from scratch for fun. The interviewer's response? Nobody uses IPX anymore, tell me something else. I didn't get the job.

      Obsession will get you nowhere except living in the dumpster.

    4. Re:Learn code easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't want to hear about your computer networking skills. I want to hear about your social networking skills. How many followers does your blog have? How many cocks have you sucked?

      None and none, you say. Get out of here. I have an important cocksucking meeting.

    5. Re: Learn code easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy gets the real corporate world.

    6. Re:Learn code easily by Nethead · · Score: 2

      Only one interview? When was this? I would have hired you. Anyone that can dig down in to ANY network protocol enough to write a stack deserves a chance.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    7. Re:Learn code easily by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I went on a job interview for a network engineering job where I explained my passion for computer networking by describing how I built my own IPX router out of spare parts and wrote the routing software from scratch for fun. The interviewer's response? Nobody uses IPX anymore, tell me something else. I didn't get the job.

      I'm not sure what network engineering means in this context, but companies like SolarFlare would hire someone who's actually done what you describe and can talk about it intelligently in a heartbeat.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Learn code easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I went on a job interview for a network engineering job where I explained my passion for computer networking by describing how I built my own IPX router out of spare parts and wrote the routing software from scratch for fun. The interviewer's response? Nobody uses IPX anymore, tell me something else. I didn't get the job.

      I've interviewed people like you. The fundamental issue you and they miss is that the job does not require or benefit from the skills you're proudly describing. In the right context, what you did is impressive, but a job interview is not the right context.

      A network engineer designs and implements networked systems using off the shelf components that every other IT person will then be able to support. They do not build hardware and write their own software.

      What you described makes me think that you'll probably piece together something that works very well at first, but can't be fixed by anyone else when something breaks because nobody else understands what you did. That is the last thing I would want in a network engineer.

      Want a network engineering job? Talk about your knowledge of current networking standards and best practices, your ability to design easy to maintain systems, your ability to manage projects and work as part of a team. In short, talk about the things that actually go into the job.

    9. Re:Learn code easily by guyniraxn · · Score: 2

      You're a terrible interviewer. Each company will have their own rules, that's the easy shit. You have someone interviewing passionately describing how they know in great detail how the technicals work and you're concerned with the new cover page for the TPS reports.

    10. Re:Learn code easily by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Skills are trivial, just a google query away. Being able to figure out difficult problems is what is rare.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    11. Re:Learn code easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a housepainter, you don't hire a chemist that is passionate about paint.

    12. Re:Learn code easily by Nethead · · Score: 1

      You just described a Sales Engineer. But I see your point. The OP might be better at Cisco or Juniper writing code and giving input on circuit design for various protocols. Maybe he could do some work on the current BSD TCP/IP stack and related modern routing projects to show that he's not stuck in the 80s (70s?) I've been pushing bits for coming on three decades now and have never run into IPX in the real world.

      It depends on the job. If'n you're hired to build the next cookie cutter box store then you're just counting drops and distances between IDFs. But if you're building out something new, maybe this is the guy.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  17. and the control group? by pbhj · · Score: 1

    How many words did the control group get right by the end? 20 hours of memorising for 72 words ... and they only remembered 36 more than they started out with?? Surely that abstract is wrong. I have a bad memory but, really?

    FWIW I tried memory-palacing and couldn't remember any of the items that were supposed to help me recall the data. I could remember some of the data though. Clearly not for me.

    1. Re:and the control group? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 *MINUTES*

    2. Re: and the control group? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You already forgot the details of the summary, which were 30 minutes a day for 40 days, totaling 20 hours. Whoever keeps telling people there would be no math is doing a disservice.

    3. Re: and the control group? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Training. They were training for that time, then later given a set to remember and recall in order to test how well the training worked.

    4. Re:and the control group? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      I learned a technique similar to the "memory palace" as an introduction to the "memory palace." This one uses a preset list, called the Tree List. I found it to be useful in and of itself, and also as an introduction to the other memory methods. Here is a link: http://greglhamon.com/memorize...

      The tree list can be used independently of the "memory palace" or even as a first stage, before entering the palace. The results are impressive. In the example of the article, just imagine not only being able to recall the words on the list, but also to be able to recall them in and out of order, and also to know which number they are 1-72, instantly.

      For instance if someone said "What was the third word on the list?" I could tell them. Or the question could be phrased "The word is 'munchkin.' Which word was that?" And I could instantly respond with, "That was the 19th word."

      The best part of learning the method was realizing that this is how the human brain works. It is so incredibly easy because it is using the underlying principles on which all memory is predicated. Normally vivid memories are spontaneously activated by outside circumstances and random chance, leaving their indelible mark because of their oddness, intensity, or humor. These memory techniques use visualization, spacial relationships, and a mental "glue" of absurdity, violence, or oddness to provide conscious control over and access to creating vivid memories at will.

      I find it humbling that these memory techniques were first developed and used before humans had writing. They are mind artifacts from the era of "Man, Earth, Sky" and the lifeblood of oral tradition. That people are using them to perform extreme feats of memory today is a testament to the creators of this method. In many ways they had to know more about how the human mind and memory operates, in a practical working sense, than we do today.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  18. This is great, but... by cloud.pt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most people simply don't need photographic memory in their daily tasks, and the brain in most of us, as the sophisticated piece of evolution it is, will just rewire itself dynamically with the environment.

    I'm not very savvy on the internals of the brain, but my calculated guess is that brain cells and links mold themselves (chemically? electrically?) either for short-term storage (like nand memory), long-term (flash, optical, magnetic...) or, and here's the kicker, for multi-field optimization/performance. Maybe even some more exotic things like keeping themselves transient, volatile, so they can be used for general purpose on demand, ad hoc (a task commonly required for astronauts, for instance, who need to be prepared to MacGyver the shit out when shit hits the... water recycler fan?).

    Now given this opinion, maybe training yourself for memory isn't such a bad thing regardless of your personal or professional goals. It is a known fact most of us have an easily distracted mind, especially in current times. Surrounded by information and "drives", we can't really decide over the most interesting "blobs" of data to pursue, to store, or to decode. It's like a chronic form of ADD, induced by the rapid evolution of communication and societal patterns, one that was once largely specific and even documented in Japanese urban areas even causing psychological disturbs, but now very common across the developed world due to entertainment, the internet and smart device ubiquity.

    We were once forced to read books as no alternative was present, now we can learn ALL educational subjects in the same place we watch videos, listen to music, make, share and experience most art, virtually travel, and of course play games (what I call the "combined experience"; what actually is the least prone to raise your IQ, especially with the cesspool that plagues most multiplayer games). And guess what: from all those things we can do with a connected smart device, the human psyche is largely biased towards all but the first one, the only one that really mattered for anything relevant in society. Unless you're a movie critic, game tester, DJ or a professional traveler of course.

    We can't really change our physiological drives, but we can certainly fool them and improve something we need but can't reach sporadically with that guidance. Making ourselves a little more prepared for memorization, especially if you have a job that benefits from it, like most here probably do. Fast and efficient programming does require a certain amount of recollection: most people will reach a better sorting algorithm, and/or will get to it faster if they remember the "basic moves" (like chess or rubik cube openings and strategies).

    But I believe the jury is still out on "the perfect human mind". And that is, by association, the reason we must also not dwell into A(s)I yet. If anything, I believe perfection for the human species comes in collective form and not individual, so there's nothing wrong to have different ways of thinking, we just need to make sure we have enough diversity (and of course, VALUE that diversity). Maybe these last two should really be the foundations for AI development. Unless you voted for the Dolan.

    1. Re:This is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, what's going on is that you're mapping from one symbolic representation to a different one, which has a more efficient storage algorithm.

      Much like how it's easier to remember a short sentence than it is to remember a random series of characters of equal length.

    2. Re:This is great, but... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      We can't really change our physiological drives

      That's kind of what Buddhism teaches you to do, right?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:This is great, but... by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      Probably, but I doubt anyone ever really achieves pure change. Urges can be mitigated by habit, but they are genetically instilled - they will come back if left "unattended".

    4. Re:This is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the fuck could you possibly know what "most people need"? Why don't you shut the fuck up and die in a fire.

    5. Re:This is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a well written declaration of incompetence!

    6. Re:This is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now try walking around the room with a book or tablet while reading out a short piece of literature or poetry. say 250..500 words. do that for 20 minutes for 3 or 4 days and you have a very good chance of being able to recall what you did decades later with only occasional refreshers. a memory palace, where for example you walk through the low-level instructions of a CPU while also having to use that knowledge daily for a month or two will have you recall them and their op-codes decades later as well. or or or or or .. anyway, sounds like you're on track ;) but you're not just mapping, you're building networks, bridges between islands of facts. bridges between islands of facts. these are very very enjoyable processes that anyone can get themselves hooked on.. and i enjoy their fruits more than i enjoy remembering walking through epic maps in quake.

    7. Re:This is great, but... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's why they focus on getting to the root cause, instead of behaviour modification.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:This is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Buddhism teaches you to let go of your desire to fulfill your physiological drives. Very different.

      As a lay-buddhist I can point out that those teachings are mostly for monks, and being a monk is for people who are suffering inside already.

      Wanting to actually change your desires (instead of just stopping caring) is not only impossible, it is an unskillful attachment that will increase your suffering.

      Wanting to reach enlightenment will cause suffering, too. Also, questions about religious metaphysics will do it. Just live this life and accept it. There is no change, only acceptance of the void. It won't make you happy, it doesn't offer any prize.

    9. Re:This is great, but... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That is the worst characterization of Buddhism I've ever read. As a lay-buddhist, you don't know much about buddhism.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:This is great, but... by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      I guess that's why so many Sillicon Valley top brass go on Indian/Tibethan pillgrimage :D

      Nah but taking it seriously, I have no idea how Budhist teachings work. I have stepped aside of serious religion self-thinking for the past 10 years or so. I just failed to see the point in believing in something that so many respected minds have... (pun incoming) lost faith in.

      And despite keeping up to speed a fair share with philosophy and psychology topics on my spare time, I fail to grasp scientific ways to really get to (and alter) the root causes of the human existence. I am a deep believer in Nietzches "wille zur macht", and with that I admit, I don't trust too much on altruistic behavior, especially the type that is self-imposed. But I believe ethical and moral compasses are the only path to really shine individually, and eventually that leads to real, untainted altruism, one that needs no mention because it just feels right and deserves external appreciation. And in that respect, Elon Musk is pretty much my God.

    11. Re:This is great, but... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent exposition of Nietzsche.

      Buddhism in three steps is:
      1) Avoid evil
      2) Try to be good
      3) Meditate

      The first two are practically universal in all the world and not particularly interesting. The third contains the interesting parts of Buddhism. Different branches of Buddhism have found different techniques and methods of practice. Some of the techniques are useful, some are not. I find it's helpful to have an idea of what you want when you start meditating. Some people don't and they just sit there in pain.

      I'm really interested where you got your understanding of Nietzsche, if you don't mind my asking.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:This is great, but... by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. I have been attempting to get to know a bit more about meditation.

      A lot of people close to me (both in similar and very different professional paths), and other notoriously famous I really appreciate have bragged about meditation helping them a lot. Just this past month I saw a stand up session of Jerry Seinfeld on a meditation dinner party, and he said he's been doing it for decades ever since he started his (weekly?) "Seinfeld", and it really helped him keep up with both pressure, full schedules and work-life balance, and overall focus on discerning important tasks and getting them sorted out in due time.

    13. Re:This is great, but... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      An easy way to get into it is set a timer for 10 minutes and just sit staring at the wall. Build up your focus, clean things, head toward your goals,

      It can be helpful to learn what other people are doing in their minds, too. The language is full of symbolism though, so it can be tough to figure out what they are talking about. In fairness, it's tough to talk about what's going on inside your mind without using symbolism. Some good places to start might be, Transmission of Light by Keizan, the Secret of the Golden Flower (best translation: Cleary), the Flower Ornament Scripture, or something by Nagarjuna. Pick one that interests you, or if nothing does, just meditate.

      I also found meditation seems more effective when I do it with other people. Sometimes I sit at the local zen temple. I don't get too involved, though, I do my own thing.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  19. Re:remembering the search engine name. by narcc · · Score: 4, Funny

    My ad blocker must not be working properly.

  20. lol by gclub · · Score: 0

    oh! i support you ideas. holiday palace

  21. But I want to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see, there is nothing I want to remember.

    What techniques can manage that?

    1. Re:But I want to forget by Nethead · · Score: 3, Funny

      You see, there is nothing I want to remember. What techniques can manage that?

      a) Drink vodka until death by liver failure
      b) Tequila works too
      c) JATO + Pontiac
      d) JATO + Pontiac in an enclosed garage (not as fun)
      e) Hey y'all, watch this! (Might require a few tries)
      f) Long walk on a short pier with Doc Martins
      g) Know something that Putin doesn't want you to know
      h) P&T's Bullet trick without understanding how it's done
      i) Ya know how on your first day of prison you're suppose to pick a fight with the meanest guy? Yeah, that will work.
      j) Get a help desk job with supplied binder
      k) If you have remembered the techniques then you have already failed
      l) Sure I can replace this outlet without turning off the breaker, I'll just be careful
      m) That looks like the right type of mushroom
      n) When in Mosul telling ISIS that it's okay, you're an atheist
      o) Just keep walking downtown with the headphones on while posting to Facebook
      p) See if you can make it across the lake on your snowmobile in November
      q) Spring break
      r) Driving while black
      s) Trying to reenact the D.B.Cooper hijacking
      t) Quaaludes
      u) Kick Chuck Norris in the ass
      v) Piss off the Clintons
      w) Speak directly to Barbara Bush
      x) Go hunting with Dick Cheney
      y) Ignore red tide warnings when clamming
      z) 72 hour pornhub marathon
       

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:But I want to forget by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

      You forgot one: Spending all your time on Slashdot. It's a living death, but you can disappear from human existence.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    3. Re:But I want to forget by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      a0) Become Spinal Tap's drummer.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:But I want to forget by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Good one!

      Or a Grateful Dead keyboardist.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re: But I want to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant "a11"

  22. They have this backwards by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Having been afflicted by a couple of particularly severe episodes of the so-called "Beer Goggles" phenomenon, I would rather learn a method that would help me forget.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  23. Tried it in 1971... by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    I tried a very similar technique in 1971; it was a short shopping list. I still remember all thirteen items!

    Real world, it is quicker and simpler to write a list. However, none of my shopping lists still exist 46 years later.

    It probably works because our memories deal with objects real or imagined differently than with words.

  24. Re:remembering the search engine name. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    So they're like penalty points that you can redeem for stuff you don't want?

  25. Sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to work well for Benedict Cumberbatch on Sherlock. Somehow it seems cooler on TV, though.

    1. Re:Sherlock by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Less a matter of memory than a very strong analytical capability.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly a matter of being fiction with a predetermined outcome.

  26. Memory Warehouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not Jonesy...

  27. Ergo masturbating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is good for your memory.

    1. Re:Ergo masturbating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...is good for your blood pressure.

  28. Re: remembering the search engine name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fewer.

  29. maybe by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    Maybe it works, tell me about it when the control group is spending half an hour a day for 40 days trying to remember lists of words and doing something with them.

    In my youth I provisioned phone service in a CO. I would take a batch of orders, memorize the numbers on them and then thread the cores and run jumpers to provision the service. I'm no savant, everyone in the office that had been there long enough could do just as well or better.

    I could remember quite a few of them at a go. It took a couple of weeks to develop the capacity to do it and I have long since lost the ability through lack of practice.

    There was no memory palace involved though, when I started the job it seemed impossible, but the facility came quickly with practice.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:maybe by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Damn, that would be a nice after retirement job for me, kind of like going fishing.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  30. More of a party trick than brain improvement by werepants · · Score: 2

    Subject says it all. Sure, if you want to be able to recite the Iliad around a campfire just like Homer, then spend hours a day practicing this technique and eventually you'll be able to do it. But you still need to put in the work for every additional item you want to remember, and that just isn't worth it for a lot of things. It's more of a curiosity than a widely applicable skill.

    1. Re:More of a party trick than brain improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homer was a victim of automation. Socrates was right all along.

    2. Re:More of a party trick than brain improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps not that necessary these days, besides making it way easier to remember stuff in exams, but it's also healthy for your brain. If I do remember correctly, relying so much on devices (search engines, notifications and stuff like that) has been shown to dumb us down. Even if it's not really necessary in today's world, it helps to keep your brain healthy. Do it regularly and your hippocampus will love you.

      However, there are still situations, where I think it is quite handy:

      - Shopping lists (faster than grabbing your phone, adding something and then checking or remembering that you forgot your phone home)

      - Exams or any other situation where you have to recall lots of things and where checking is either not allowed, cumbersome or impossible.

      - Remembering dates. Birthdays, appointments and stuff like that, unless you rely on your phone or your choise of social media to remind you.

      - Remembering chords, notes and other stuff in music, no need for cheat sheet on what frets to use and easier to memorize musical pieces.

      - Remembering faces and names (yes, the memory athletes compete on this too).

      All kinds of small stuff like that, where it is actually useful and losing you phone or internet access doesn't make you a helpless little wanker.

    3. Re: More of a party trick than brain improvement by dave26199 · · Score: 2

      It's extremely applicable for learning languages. The problem with language learning is you have to learn 1-2 thousands things (vocab) before it's useful. Once it's useful you can use it and you don't need any special techniques.

    4. Re: More of a party trick than brain improvement by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I was going to say the same thing. The memory work required for learning a language is brutal (I've been speaking English for decades and I still learn new words fairly often). Anything to make it easier is a boon.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re: More of a party trick than brain improvement by werepants · · Score: 1

      It's extremely applicable for learning languages.

      Have you personally used it for that? By my understanding of the technique, it helps you to memorize arbitrary lists of things, which is relevant to memorizing a story, or random digits of pi, or an arbitrary list of nouns. But nowhere do I see that you're capturing actual semantics or a working knowledge of these items, and in fact I could imagine it being counterproductive, because what you're really trying to do is create a bunch of arbitrary but creative and memorable associations with the list items. Which is inherently different than trying to learn the meaning of the items in question.

      Anyhow, I'm legitimately curious, but that's the state of the research on this topic as I understand it (and most brain training research, to be honest) - you can certainly get better at any skill through practice, but it's not clear at all that any of those abilities are transferable. The onus is on the researchers to show that getting good at memorizing the order of a list has anything to do with cognition in day-to-day, practical matters. With enough effort I could learn to recite a list of 1000 words in Russian, but that wouldn't mean that I understood their meaning, proper syntactical usage, conjugation, or anything involved with using them effectively in conversation.

      At the end of the day, this makes you good at memorizing and reciting long, random lists. That's not what learning a language is about, and it's not something that anybody really needs to do very often. In those cases where it is useful (think of the alphabet), we already have mnemonic devices established to help us out. And maybe there is some subset of people for whom memorizing the order of the periodic table would be really useful, or things like that, and it does sound like a good technique for students - but it's been in question for a while whether that kind of testing is actually a good evaluation of a student's real handle on the material. Rote memorization is just a very, very narrow application of the human mind's capabilities. Working memory seems to be much more broadly applicable, and even there it's an open question whether training really ends up being transferable in a useful way.

    6. Re:More of a party trick than brain improvement by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In non-literate societies, storytellers don't repeat stories anywhere near verbatim, and even how long the telling takes varies. You don't need special memory techniques to remember a story if you don't have to remember all the details all the time.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re: More of a party trick than brain improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Memorizing words with this method is like writing a dictionary in your brain, though. You still have to "look up" the word, though you do it through thinking rather than paging through a paper dictionary or typing the word into an electronic dictionary. It doesn't provide the fluent access that comes from truly absorbing words, which still requires repeated exposure to the word in multiple contexts. So, I'm not sure it's worth the effort unless you won't have access to a dictionary for some reason.

  31. Wait! I just remembered the memory man. by bdwoolman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Years ago I was gifted a book by some very nice people after I gave a talk. The book was How to Develop a Super Power Memory by Harry Lorayne. It was full of practical mnemonics and methods to remember numbers, peoples' names etc. etc. It also delved into the history of the use of memory. The take away? The brain is like a muscle. Use it or lose it. I never became obsessed on the subject, but twenty years later I still use many of the tools outlined in the book to remember things. Mindfullness is a big fad these days. But really it is just watching what you are doing, paying attention, remembering what you need to remember. Like anything else it is a skill that can be sharpened using a set of tried and true tools.

    Now permit me to digress onto a related topic. A lot of sturm und drang these days about the dangers of AI. I for one am not too panicked by the prospect of Skynet and its ilk. But to my mind one of the very real downsides of AI is the offloading of memory tasks and degradation of important human abilities. The brain is energy efficient (read: lazy ass) if it knows something is recorded elsewhere or readily available elsewhere it will be more likely to forget it. Look at how our geographic sense deteriorates with GPS.

    These days I make an effort not to always Google something the moment I can't summon it into memory. I will give it time and the name of the actress or politician or writer will often percolate up. And if I am returning to a place for a second time I try to visualize my route beforehand and leave my navigation system out of it. Sure. If I am tormented endlessly, or in a heated conversation, or lost, or pressed for time, it makes sense to resort to the computational oxygen around me. But I try to avoid over dependency on it all.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
    1. Re:Wait! I just remembered the memory man. by pz · · Score: 2

      I turn on my phone's GPS to use an on-line mapping tool only rarely, such as when I'm visiting an unfamiliar city. Otherwise, I check a mapping service beforehand, memorize any key specifics, and off we go!

      The upside: I'm always looking at the road and can avoid the idiots who aren't.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  32. Re:remembering the search engine name. by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Never search with Bing, not even ironically.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  33. Re: remembering the search engine name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    There isn't a black person alive who isn't better than you in every conceivable way. I mean look at you. I know. It's hideous. If you were worth shit, you'd have that job and you wouldn't be whinging about Sanjay.

  34. memorizing cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats how I learned how to do speed cards in a short time for the memrise contest. I was just about able to break the USA record at the time after only 2 months.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ikv1dkn3VY

  35. This technique has been described ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science in the news with old news. Beware students, its all about your money now..

  36. Memorizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought everyone knows this already because of this new Sherlock Holmes TV-show where Voldemort uses this mind palace stuff.

    Mind palace stuff is really easy, and does not take 40 days to master. My 10 year old daughter had to learn a kind of poem to school. So I taught her this technique and she learned the poem + the technique in 15 minutes.

    I have never found real life use for this technique. It is already known, that things learnt with this method disappear from the memory the same way everything else.

  37. I can do this but it's not very practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading about some guy who could memorize the order of several decks of cards, I decided to learn the technique myself.

    I learnt my first deck of cards after practicing for an afternoon. I linked every card in the deck to somebody I knew and wrote it down. Remembering the link between each person and their card was the hardest part.

    Then I thought about my walk into town, a journey I made frequently. I imagined that the person linked to card number 1 was stood next to my front door, person linked to card 2 was next to my gate, person number 3 was stood at the light outside my house .... you get the idea.

    It worked fine, and I have a lousy memory in general. I could even remember a deck of cards after going to sleep. But it took me 5-10 seconds to give me enough time to remember each card. That would be useless if you were trying to memorize the letters of an email address, or the digits of a phone number.

    I also tended to forget the link between the cards and the people after a month or 2, so it's a skill you need to maintain in order to use. It's fun, but not very helpful to me.

  38. Here's the technique applied to a deck of cards. by alex4point0 · · Score: 0

    DJ Shadow + Little Dragon “Scale It Back” https://vimeo.com/31908447

    --
    By the time you finish reading this sentence will end.
  39. Re:remembering the search engine name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 'fewer', as in less meat, but few letters.

  40. What about by dschiptsov · · Score: 1

    just reading good classic novels and poetry? BTW, lots of Indian tantric and Tibetan "meditative" techniques are based on visualizations, and some of them has been studied and considered useless by scientific consensus

  41. Re: remembering the search engine name. by donutz · · Score: 1

    Maybe even less as well, if we're talking amount of letter in terms of ink/pixels.

    Google
    Bing

    Big "B" is approx. 2 o's worth of letter, i and l are pretty close, so...

    Google
    oolng

    Subtract the common letters to get:

    Ge
    n

    Yep, looks like fewer and less letters to me.

  42. Backup your contacts by Immerman · · Score: 1

    So why haven't you synced your contact list with your PC?
    iPhone does it easily through iTunes
    Android does it easily if you sync to a Gmail account
    Pretty much everything else has some sort of PC program available that will talk to your phone and extract contacts as vCards or a CSV (comma-separated values) text file.

    You can go the CSV/vCard route with iPhone and Android as well, but it's a bit more complicated.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  43. A new Slashdot record? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    We've had lots of stories arriving late on Slashdot, but this might be a record. Considering that memory palaces were known to ancient Greece, and the knowledge never has been lost, this story is millennia late.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    1. Re:A new Slashdot record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe next time you can just remember ancient, means really old, then you can avoid stories that mention it in the headline. No need to even bother with the summary, or telling us how hip and living in the now you are.

  44. So you're seriously telling me... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    ...there's nothing that is sold on Amazon by any of the vendors that you could ever possibly want?

  45. Why? by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    Your ideas intrigue me. Do you have a newsletter I can subscribe to?

  46. reformat the hard drive by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    I still have the McDonalds Menu Song memorized from back in the 80s. I know my phone number from first grade, but not from college. I can remember the Quadratic Equation but not my kid's teacher's name. Why do some things stick around for decades, but others you can't remember a week (or less) later? Do people who play these memory games have a method for wiping the slate clean? I'd hate to accidentally remember the location of the 6 of clubs a year later.

  47. Re: remembering the search engine name. by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    "Fewer" has been replaced by "Less". This was done several years ago by an otherwise undocumented change pushed to all users of the English language. Apparently you are using an obsolete version of the language that has been hacked to avoid mandatory updates. No more English language support for you, mate.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey