Slashdot Mirror


Volkwagen Finally Pleads Guilty On 'Dieselgate' Charges (cnet.com)

Friday Volkswagen admitted in court that they'd committed fraud in their diesel emissions tests, also pleading guilty to falsifying statements and obstruction of justice. An anonymous reader quotes CNET: It marks the first time VW admitted guilt in any court in the world, according to a VW spokesman speaking to Reuters. The judge overseeing the case in the U.S. District Court in Detroit accepted the plea and will issue a sentence at a hearing on April 21. "The agreements that we have reached with the US government reflect our determination to address misconduct that went against all of the values Volkswagen holds so dear," Volkswagen said in an emailed statement... The road to Dieselgate's conclusion still has plenty of pavement, though. The company is still under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Internal Revenue Service. And that's in the US alone.
"VW AG is pleading guilty to all three counts because it is guilty on all three counts," the company's general counsel told the judge. Reuters also reports that VW offered to buy back half a million vehicles just in America, and agreed to spend up to $25 billion in the U.S. to address claims from unhappy owners.

115 comments

  1. Excessive reparations demands on Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We know how that turns out!

  2. Comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comments on this post have been disabled by site administrators.

  3. 'Dieselgate'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, then there is no free pizza and a ride on Air Force One after all?

  4. A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    What I don't understand is why anyone in the US would buy a VW in the first place? They are far less reliable than "Japanese" cars, and probably "American" cars. Maybe German immigrants would buy them for patriotic reasons?

    1. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      American cars (except Ford) have barely any presence in Europe, because they are lower quality than most other cars. So I guess Americans buying VW's were looking for quality.

    2. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly for the superior German engineering. Turns out it was all a lie.

    3. Re:A mystery by pecosdave · · Score: 2

      This really saddens me too.

      I used to avoid Ford like the plague because they were the American vehicle with quality issues while GM was the reliable one.

      I know from my Saturn with a stick-shift that GM transmissions turned to crap, as did many other things from GM in the recent decade or two. Ford decided to stop building trash and stepped up their game. I now have a Ford Transit Connect outfitted for passenger as a family vehicle. We love it, we get lots of questions about it, lots of people tell us how much they like it and are considering getting one. It's got a great reliability rating from consumer reports. The GM and Ford of the 80's and 90's switched places in the 2000's / 2010's.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    4. Re:A mystery by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They are far less reliable than "Japanese" cars, and probably "American" cars.

      You've clearly never owned an American car. Well actually that's not fair, no one ever owns an American car, they are more salves to its workshop needs.

    5. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is why anyone in the US would buy a VW in the first place? They are far less reliable than "Japanese" cars, and probably "American" cars. Maybe German immigrants would buy them for patriotic reasons?

      You're a troll.

      I'm not German and I bought a brand new Golf 6 and 1/2 year ago. Maybe I'm just lucky but it's been ultra-reliable. It now has 64000 miles on it and the only thing I've had to fix was replacing the battery and the rear brakes this winter. Front brakes are due for a change maybe next year.

      I think it was rated very highly for reliability at the time I bought it. It certainly was near the top and nowhere near lemon status like you suggest.

    6. Re: A mystery by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Yes. A fact that is generally universally accepted. I take it you have had a Japanese car and a bad experience with it? Pick 6 numbers between 0 and 42. I'll make sure never to play them in the Lottery.

    7. Re:A mystery by ichthus · · Score: 0

      They are far less reliable than "Japanese" cars, and probably "American" cars

      I'm sure there are lots of differing sources of opinions online, but this site lists VW just after all of the Japanese brands: So, there's a reason to choose VW over American -- build quality.

      Why choose VW over the Japanese offerings? Because the Japanese are always about two years behind everyone else when it comes to incorporating new technology in their vehicles. And, they're boring. Just look at the Camry and Accord -- how boring and bland can you get?

      --
      sig: sauer
    8. Re:A mystery by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      If you need your car to bring excitement into your life, perhaps you're doing something wrong?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:A mystery by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      no one ever owns an American car, they are more salves to its workshop needs.

      Axle grease.

      I miss my 240SX like the desert needs the rain. That was truly one of the best cars ever made. I now have an Audi ABZ V8 just lying around that would love to go into a 240SX. It would be sad what it would do to the electronic reliability, but at least the rest of the car would still be simplicity incarnate.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re: A mystery by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I've owned *one* Japanese car, lots of American cars and a *ton* of German cars. I currently drive the latest Suburban... and while I do indeed love it, I should point out that it's common fucking knowledge that Toyota makes the most reliable cars - i.e. the best cars one can own... while Audi makes the best cars you can drive... but damn are they problematic pieces of shit.

    11. Re:A mystery by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why choose VW over the Japanese offerings? Because the Japanese are always about two years behind everyone else when it comes to incorporating new technology in their vehicles. And, they're boring. Just look at the Camry and Accord -- how boring and bland can you get?

      The logical conclusion if you were thinking about a VW is to buy a Nissan. It's one step better than VW in both of those areas. The styling is more inspiring than VW. That's not saying much, to be fair, but it's still true. In some cases it is saying a lot, like the Juke, although they've taken away some of its personality in the latest refresh. They are a little too enamored of CVTs, but the interesting Nissans are still available without it. I've also found Nissan to be extremely friendly to the garage repairman. Their service manuals are absolutely top-notch with the best diagrams in the business bar none, and very easy-to-follow troubleshooting charts. Nobody does that stuff better than the Japanese, and IME nobody is better among them at doing it than Nissan. They also make the documentation available at quite reasonable prices, and then go on to actually carry things that you need like harness repair kits for specific years. I was able to get the fuel injector harness repair kit specific to only the 1989 240SX, for example — the injector connectors are keyed differently than for any other model. I could have sourced them direct from some other AMP dealer, but the point is that I didn't have to. The prices were actually reasonable, as well. I have plenty of experience buying parts for other makes, and Nissan was one of the best for me.

      Alternately, Subaru isn't too much further up the chart, and it's a much more interesting vehicle than any VW. For what VW will charge you for a Haldex whose shortcomings are mitigated by EBD, Subaru will give you an electronic VCD.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess Americans buying VW's were looking for quality.

      Then they were fools. VW has had long running quality problems, and any owner could provide at least anecdotal evidence of this (unless they were fanboys or something).

    13. Re:A mystery by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Interesting, how'd you manage to wear out the rear brakes before the front?

    14. Re:A mystery by Strider- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is pretty standard on most European cars (and in fact true of all modern vehicles with traction control). The braking system is biased towards the rear brakes, which keeps the car from nose diving during hard braking. Also, in slippery conditions prior ABS/ESP kicking in, it allows the front wheels, which steer, to stay turning longer before locking up (and triggering ABS/traction control).

      My VW typically goes through 3 sets of rear pads before I have to replace my fronts.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    15. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subaru? Interesting? There is no personality to the vehicle and the interior quality is garbage. And their 2.5L engines love to blow headgaskets. Yep, great cars there. Get a Toyota. At least it will be just as boring as a Nissan but have far less issues.

    16. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't understand is why anyone in the US would buy a VW in the first place? They are far less reliable than "Japanese" cars, and probably "American" cars. Maybe German immigrants would buy them for patriotic reasons?

      Because they are well built, reliable and have a great combination of efficiency and performance.

      Oh, you were trying to be funny and didn't expect a proper answer?

    17. Re:A mystery by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Interesting, how'd you manage to wear out the rear brakes before the front?

      Are you kidding? Most cars have hugely different front and rear brake systems. They should wear out roughly equally but in many cases the front is far overspec'd. Hell it's quite common on the bottom end of the market to have discs at the front and drums at the rear. And drums don't last nearly as long.

    18. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Japanese cars come close to German cars in reliability surveys (e.g. ADAC), American cars tend to be in the lowest regions, below French, Italian and Korean brands.

    19. Re:A mystery by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Japanese cars are much more reliable, but German cars are much more fun. If you can afford car repairs and/or have a spare car or two, it's hard to beat German cars for fun.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    20. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be why Volkswagens are by far the longest-lasting cars.

      I have never heard this claim before. Like any brand VW has had some quality problems over the years, but there are very good reasons why Volkswagens hold their value better than other brands in the same price range. Buyers expect them to last longer and with less trouble based on to past experience. This is what made them the market leader.

    21. Re:A mystery by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 2

      If you need your car to bring excitement into your life, ...

      ... then you need to cut your brake lines. That'll solve your problem right quick.

      Old Chinese curse: May you live in interesting times.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    22. Re: A mystery by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      If you're pro Audi then you probably are aware that Audi is made by VW, who also own a multitude of other car companies too. Toyota cars are rubbish, they always appear with at least 1 on the worst cars list.

    23. Re: A mystery by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I've had several Toyotas and they've been incredibly reliable. Took them in for a service twice a year, and nothing ever went wrong. Didn't even need to top up fluid levels in between.

    24. Re:A mystery by ichthus · · Score: 1

      Do you wear khaki Dockers and a blue shirt every day?

      --
      sig: sauer
    25. Re:A mystery by ichthus · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you mentioned the Juke, because I think it's the only car Nissan makes that isn't ugly. I really like it, minus the CVT. But, starting at the bottom, the Versa is one of the ugliest cars on the road. The Altima and Maxima are both bland -- just like the Accord. Their sports cars are nice, but I guess I just don't pay much attention to that niche. But, the Pathfinder --- this one actually irritates me a bit. It used to be THE BEST looking SUV on the market, and now it looks like a minivan. And, the Xterra... yup, it's still an Xterra, waiting for a redesign so it doesn't look exactly the same as it did almost twenty years ago.

      Overall, I think Nissan has really dropped the ball in the last 5 - 10 years with their styling.

      --
      sig: sauer
    26. Re:A mystery by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you need your car to bring excitement into your life, perhaps you're doing something wrong?

      Usually that something is commuting a long distance. I, for one, do like a car that is exciting to drive on a back road. But because I am getting older, I have a luxo-barge...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re: A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took them in for a service twice a year, and nothing ever went wrong. Didn't even need to top up fluid levels in between.

      You're supposed to use worst-case scenarios

    28. Re:A mystery by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not traction control, yaw control. Traction control is when you're accelerating. But that can cause rear brake wear as well; on slippery surfaces vehicles often use the brakes to slow a spinning wheel.

      For vehicles whose system is split diagonally instead of front/rear, they also may overapply the rear brakes if ABS isn't working correctly, because proportioning is handled in software.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re: A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if parent is a troll or just a tool, but here is a recent Consumer Report list of of car reliably by brand

      http://www.clark.com/most-least-reliable-cars-consumer-report:

    30. Re:A mystery by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      American cars (except Ford) have barely any presence in Europe, because they are lower quality than most other cars. So I guess Americans buying VW's were looking for quality.

      That makes very little sense because European cars are among the worst when it comes to reliability. Japanese tend to be the most reliable, with American second, and European third. Volvo, Volkswagen, and Fiat in particular all tend to be horrid.

    31. Re: A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do not hold value better. Just look at the classifieds. You are a liar or just plain stupid. And trying to defend your terrible purchase.

    32. Re: A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its not. Front wheels always get more braking. It would be unsafe for the lighter rear wheel to lock up constantly. They don't. And its not because ABS is always activating. Its because front wheels (engine location) has more breaking.

      You were right to be suspect. Its not a true story and written by someone that doesn't understand brakes.

    33. Re: A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volkswagens holding their value well is a well-known and non-controversial fact. If you don't believe it, just check a few used car web sites, or the depreciation tables of your country's motorists' association. It's also why you can lease a Golf for little more than a Mégane or a Focus, despite the Golf being much more expensive to buy: the lease company expects to sell it for more after the contract ends.

    34. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nonsense. In objective studies (e.g. ADAC's breakdown count studies), American brands almost always come last and Japanese brands score above French, but below German brands. If you look at durability, it's hard to define objective measures, but observations are not supporting your position. 20+ year old Japanese cars are very rare and their American counterparts are essentially nonexistent, while German cars of that vintage are still very common and older French cars are also a common sight. Cheaply built cars tend to require expensive repairs to pass inspections at some point. The rust problems American and Japanese cars are known for are probably a large part of the problem. The French once had those problems too, but they solved it in the 1980s.

    35. Re:A mystery by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      This is pretty standard on most European cars (and in fact true of all modern vehicles with traction control). The braking system is biased towards the rear brakes, which keeps the car from nose diving during hard braking. Also, in slippery conditions prior ABS/ESP kicking in, it allows the front wheels, which steer, to stay turning longer before locking up (and triggering ABS/traction control).

      All of these conditions are a sign that it's time to ease up on the loud pedal. You should not be activating traction control, ABS, etc. routinely on public roads.

    36. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistically, Japanese cars are less reliable than German cars (but more than French, American or Korean cars).

    37. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nonsense. In objective studies (e.g. ADAC's breakdown count studies), American brands almost always come last and Japanese brands score above French, but below German brands. If you look at durability, it's hard to define objective measures, but observations are not supporting your position. 20+ year old Japanese cars are very rare and their American counterparts are essentially nonexistent, while German cars of that vintage are still very common and older French cars are also a common sight. Cheaply built cars tend to require expensive repairs to pass inspections at some point. The rust problems American and Japanese cars are known for are probably a large part of the problem. The French once had those problems too, but they solved it in the 1980s.

      How surprising that the ADAC (which is a German organization btw.) study found out that German cars are the most reliable. Thanks for enlighten us!
      Thread can be closed then. We have the "objective" results. Move along...

    38. Re:A mystery by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I always said that Volkswagen was German for failed engineer. Having dealt with a number of early 2000s VW they were all just basket cases and have things laid out in poor ways.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    39. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming the messenger won't change the facts.

    40. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volkswagen tends to attract the best and brightest engineers, since they have a larger budget and more facilities than anyone else.

    41. Re: A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford Freestyle - while it doesn't lock up the rear, it does eat pads on the rear to the rate of about 3 to 1 for fronts. Smaller pads, and more engagement at the start of pedal travel to tuck the rear end down. It can happen. I've changed enough pads on the car to know.

    42. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistically, you're wrong.

      “Traditionally, Toyota and Honda are leading in terms of reliability and durability,” says Renee Stephens, vice president of automotive quality research at J.D. Power. “Lexus for example, has been on top of the durability ratings for 15 of the past 18 years.”

    43. Re: A mystery by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I'm hardly "pro Audi." Volkswagen (including Audi, Porsche, Seat, Lambo, etc) can go fuck themselves. They deliberately design Audis so that once they're out of warranty, they're virtually impossible to maintain and certainly not economically. The last Audi I'd be willing to own would be an early 2000's A6/S6/All road and only because I can do everything myself. BTW, the thing that single-handedly makes Audis the best cars to drive is their use of Torsen center differentials; VW's and "fake Quattros" like the A3 and TT use Haldex differentials (pfft) while other manufacturers use equally ineffective systems: if you've ever compared a 4Matic Benz (Borg Warner center diff) to an Audi in terms of how well they do in the snow, the results speak for themselves.Regarding Toyota, you simply do not know what the fuck you're talking about; I've *lost count* of the number of experienced American and German car mechanics who drive Corollas.

    44. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GM and Ford of the 80's and 90's switched places in the 2000's / 2010's.

      Lemme know when GM/Ford switch places with Honda/Toyota. Maybe then I'll consider purchasing my first American car.

    45. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know that organisation, but their findings are somewhat out of line with other studies, where Mercedes-Benz and the VAG marques tend do better than Toyota and Mazda (and much better than Nissan). I wonder what their methodology is. It is not very convincing that they claim to have statistically significant figures for tiny (in sales) brands such as Honda and Lexus.

    46. Re: A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If yoy sell them before the rust starts, Toyotas are excellent.

    47. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, in the US, pickups from the 1980s are still a common sight, even in the states that heavily salt roads in the winter. Sure, they have some body rust but nothing that affects safety or driveability. Japanese pickups more than 15 years old are non-existent due to rust issues in the frames and other structural areas.

      As far as passenenger cars, you regularly see 20 year old American and Japanese cars on the road. Cars from the early 1990s aren't uncommon. Seeing a European car older than 2005 is rare.

      I suspect all of this this is more related to the volume sold than quality.

      Also, Ford's European models are significantly different than the North American models, although this has been changing, most visibly with the Focus. Most Americans have never heard of a Ford Cortina.

    48. Re: A mystery by rhazz · · Score: 1

      Link above broken. I assume this is the correct link. And the parent is correct, in this 2015 article Toyota placed #2. Audi happens to be #3.

    49. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A large part of the trans-Atlantic difference is probably explained by mandatory periodic safety inspections. Poorly built or rust-prone cars that may still work fine will sooner or later require expensive repairs to pass inspection in Europe. Those repairs may not be worth it if they cost more than the car is worth. I know some US states have inspections too, but they are not as strict and a car that does not pass can still be sold in another state that does not require inspection. Parts availability, the number of mechanics that have experience with a specific model, the second-hand market and, as you say, volume, also come into play. The market demands, requirements and expectations are very different.

    50. Re:A mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Ford's model range in Europe is mostly separate from that in North America. Many people in the UK tend to think of Ford as British, and some people on the continent tend to think of it as German. But even then, Ford is considered a somewhat downmarket brand in Europe.

  5. All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by alexo · · Score: 1

    "all of the values Volkswagen holds so dear"

    Profits above everything else?

    1. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, the company VW might have admitted guilt . . . but the management, from the top down to the bottom have not. First, the CEO tried to blame it on "a couple of rogue programmers." Yeah, right.

      Now all the managers are singing the Sergeant Schultz Schtick: "I know nuh-thing! Nuh-thing!" Again, some engineering manager must have known that something was amiss, and this could only be kept secret by an extensive company internal conspiracy.

      The folks who will really suffer from this fiasco, besides the customers, are the simple assembly line workers, who have been or will be laid off. It's the top managers who really need to be torched for this.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re: All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ein Reich, ein Führer, ein Volkswagen?

      Work(ing diesel emissions systems) will set you free?

    3. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Well, we could also talk about the poor people who have to breath in the pretty toxic stew of emissions gasses that come out of a diesel engine.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The perennial criticism of Volkswagen, especially by investers, but also by competitors, has always been that they don't seem to care about profits. The company is essentially run by engineers, labour representatives and local politicians, so R&D and protecting jobs always came first. The most important change dieselgate and the American looting that followed brought is that management was forced to improve profitability, with even a previously completely unthinkable job reduction at home (via natural attrition, but still).

    5. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The person behind it all seems to have been ex-CEO Martin Winterkorn (if not directly, then by unnecessarily causing the circumstances which led to the cheating). Winterkorn had been the head of Audi, while Wolfgang Bernhard was the head of VW. Bernhard was hired from Daimler-Benz-Chrysler, so was seen as an outsider within the VW Group (VW / Audi / Porsche). In an apparent corporate coup the former CEO was ousted by Winterkorn and the chairman. Winterkorn was crowned the new CEO, and they also got rid of Bernhard in the process.

      Bernhard had just licensed the DEF system from Mercedes Benz (diesel exhaust fluid - adding urea to the diesel exhaust to convert NOx into nitrogen and water). Winterkorn's ego was apparently big enough that it wasn't enough to get rid of Bernhard, he also dumped the DEF-enabled engine Bernhard had been working on. Thus the VW 2.0L diesel engine without a DEF system was born, whose only way to comply with emissions regulations was by cheating.

      Winterkorn resigned because of the scandal. But believe me a lot of VW owners would love to see him jailed.

    6. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The folks who will really suffer from this fiasco, besides the customers

      Please describe how the customers are suffering from this fiasco.

      Air pollution is mostly caused by other sources, shipping, oil refineries, glass factories, cement factories, coal power, etc. Compared to the major air pollution sources, all the cars in the world are just a drop in the bucket.

      If only our government would put half the effort into reducing the air pollution from the actual large air pollution contributors as they did into grandstanding over VW and its shame, it might actually make a difference. Slamming VW over this is going to do nothing but make it almost impossible to get a new VW diesel, probably the best made consumer diesel engines in the world, into the US. Thanks, assholes.

    7. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the even worse stew of emission gases that comes out of a petrol engine, for that matter.

    8. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far dozens of managers and high-level engineers have been sacked or suspended and most of them are subject to criminal investigations and will likely be prosecuted. Zero assembly line workers have been laid off (which would have been rather pointless - it is very unlikely that they were even aware).

      Meanwhile GM, Fiat Chrysler, Renault-Nissan, Ford, PSA, Toyota, etc. continue to insist that their defeat devices in cars that produce much more NOx than any Volkswagen are completely legal and serve only to protect the engine, despite heaps of evidence from official and independent studies. I am not aware of any employee of any of these companies being suspended or sacked. Except for a few 'voluntary' recalls, there have been no consequences at all for the large-scale cheating in any company other than tge one that was stupid enough to admit.

    9. Re:All of the values Volkswagen holds so dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current 2.0L VW Group TDi (EA288) does not use an AdBlue system in most applications and it is one of the very few engines that actually meet Euro 6 under normal conditions on the road, so using AdBlue is apparently not really a necessary requirement, but it does indeed make things a lot easier. It essentially makes it possible to get any engine meet any NOx norm without any compromises in the engine design. It may well have been the only way ten years ago, when the EA188 was being developed.

  6. Farfegnugen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sister in law just got her check from VW and now is happily driving her new Honda CRV.

    1. Re: Farfegnugen! by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      Wait till she runs into classic CRV problems and there are many

    2. Re:Farfegnugen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commiserations on having a retard in the family.

  7. They're all guilty by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    With all of the funny electronics running in these vehicles, unless I can audit the code being used I'm going to assume every automaker is doing the same thing and Volkswagon forgot or didn't think to pay the campaign *cough bribe cough* contributions.

    1. Re:They're all guilty by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      you're not going to audit the code in your car. you're not going to audit the code in your Instant Pot.

      you want the code to be available to the community, so that others can get together and audit it.

      and no carmaker is going to permit that unless compelled to, because the code is too critical.

      so be focused on real accountability.

      i see no VW execs nor engineers yet facing the possibility of real jail time.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re: They're all guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a retard. Even if they gave you the code, do you really think you are qualified? No. Do you even have the time? Yes. You are obviously an unemployed idiot.

  8. The huge penalty means VW doesn't value "Profits" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

  9. Bosch, too by chill · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure of the extent, but Bosch has reached a tentative settlement with the U.S. courts as well. As a Jetta diesel owner who accepted the buyback, I just received a postcard from the courts saying I'm automatically included in the Bosch settlement, unless I actively opt out. They'll be sending me a check for up to $350 once (if) the settlement is accepted by the courts. The hearing is on May 11.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Bosch, too by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      They'll be sending me a check for up to $350 once (if) the settlement is accepted by the courts. The hearing is on May 11.

      Sounds like someone will be getting a coupon for 5 free pine tree air fresheners.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  10. Good used market. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this means there will be a really packed used market of ultra cheap Diesel VW's with patched firmware. The real problem here is the severity of the regulations, not the cars themselves. If passenger trucks were held to the same standard there wouldn't be a single redneck "rollin' coal" out there.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:Good used market. by haruchai · · Score: 2

      The real problem here is the severity of the regulations, not the cars themselves. If passenger trucks were held to the same standard there wouldn't be a single redneck "rollin' coal" out there.

      "Severity of the regulations" should be the banner of every whining industry that's been forced to clean up their act.
      In this case, it's possible to be compliant but VW et al didn't want to implement a system that might have reduced performance or increase cost slightly.
      So they chose to lie & cheat. Not the 1st to do this, won't be the last.

      The US trucking industry is very proud that more than 1/3rd of medium & heavy commercial trucks are considered near-zero for particulate emissions, up from less than 10% in 2007 and claims that a single truck from 1988 would emit as much as 60 new trucks.
      http://www.dieselforum.org/new...

      My response is that it's all long-overdue, that it should be at least 75% compliance by now and that ALL vehicles should be held to the standard.

      Because it's (almost 20 years into) the 21st century

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:Good used market. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      i haven't seen that yet.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:Good used market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rolling coal is technically illegal in the US. They're all held to the same standard under the law, but the law is not enforced equally. Typical America.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_coal#Legality

    4. Re:Good used market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the regulations in the US (and especially California) call for extremely low levels in NOx emissions, while being relatively lax on much more harmful types of emissions (particulates and VOCs). That would not be so bad if it weren't for the fact that engine design always involves an inherent tradeoff between NOx emissions and more or less all other emissions. They specifically sought to artificically cripple diesel engines at the cost of more harmful emissions, likely to protect US car and parts manufacturers, which do not have competitive diesel technology. Other jurisdictions tend to have separate sets of emissions requirements for diesel and petrol engines, letting each type be optimised for the lowest overall level of harm due to emissions achievable with the technology.

      None of this makes it any better that several manufacturers (or at the very least a sizeable number of their employees) chose to cheat emission standards, but it does put things into perspective.

    5. Re:Good used market. by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      That's a very good argument for much stricter regulations and enforcement on trucks. But it's a terrible argument for going lighter on cars.

      And as I understand it, a software-patched VW diesel is thoroughly nerfed anyway; and will get neither the performance nor the mileage of the one using the Konami code.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    6. Re:Good used market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Federal Motor Vehicle Agency (KBA) required from the start that the fix would not reduce fuel efficiency, performance or durability. They have thoroughly tested the fix for each model before approval, so it's unlikely that there will be any significant downsides. Last I read, about half of the affected cars had received their patches and I've yet to read about serious problems with more than a handful of cars.

    7. Re:Good used market. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      If passenger trucks were held to the same standard there wouldn't be a single redneck "rollin' coal" out there.

      That would be a good thing. Just like people driving SUVs who have no need to, tons of people are driving gigantic trucks who have no need to.

      I am not saying they shouldn't be able to, they should just pay more (for more road wear, more pollution, etc.,) and be held to the same standards as cars.

    8. Re:Good used market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they helped out plant-life worldwide by contributing slightly more carbon dioxide to the air.

      Which reminds me, I need to start taking off my catalytic converter after each SMOG Check(tm). All this greeny-baby garbage is probably putting a small dent in CO2 levels, and I want to see that reversed!

  11. Everything is relative by alexo · · Score: 1

    1. Whether the penalty is "huge" can only be decided if we know how much VW profited from the deception.
    2. They miscalculated the chance of being caught.

    1. Re:Everything is relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to what GM had to pay in a similar case involving roughly the same number of cars, the penalty in this case is extraordinarily huge.

  12. Volkwagen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ja ja! Natürlich! Das ist fantastisch stangenzirkel!

  13. Great. A guilty verdict. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who then, who's going to jail?

  14. VW should file for a Chapter 8 bankruptcy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the end, this method worked so wonderfully for the other U.S. car companies. US JOBS are at stake.... LoLz....

  15. Reasonable penalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Number of affected vehicles sold times (average price of vehicles sold, inflation adjusted in current dollars, minus average current used car sale price); to be distributed to all owners in proportion to their vehicle's current used car sale price. I saw the number 11 million thrown around as the number of such cars in the U.S. Say average resale value is 33% of the original $30k inflation adjusted dollars. 10M x ($30k - $10k) = $200B.

    Punitive damages are trebled, so also pay twice the above to the government or someone else to distribute as appropriate. So the US local, state and federal governments affected can decide how to split the $400B and give it back to the people.

    Throw some community service in there for good measure. Maybe something like 1,000 hours per corporate employee or executive. I see around 600K VW employees. That means they are responsible for 600M hours, or some 68 millennia, of community service. I propose the court require managers and executives to perform there hours before requiring subordinates to complete theirs.

    So, a reasonable and fair punishment is $600B and ~60 millennia of community service.

  16. A lot of folks want to be different by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and unique and well, doing that for real is hard and moderately risky. Using your purchases to differentiate yourself is an easy/safe solution. Yeah, it's shallow, but that's also what makes it easy. For a more extreme example look for anyone who owns a Scout or a Saab.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:A lot of folks want to be different by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I think at this point anyone buying a Scout or Scout II is either an International Harvester fan or wants to have a project 4x4 that isn't a Jeep.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  17. How'd VW plead guilty? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's not a person, it's an abstract concept commonly known as a company...

    I don't suppose anyone who actually made/forced these decisions will be pleading guilty to anything? A pound of weed'll put you in jail for half a decade or more but I'm guessing these guys will just pay a token fine that's less than 1/3 what they made off the cheating.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  18. Buyback of Cars by hackus · · Score: 1

    Well, I submitted my buyback in December and haven''t heard a word from Volkswagon on the issue.

    On top of that, when I call about my car they consistently tell me my signed papers aren't in order, or my papers are blank, or my papers are not received from their settlement portal or they are notorized wrong...the excuses are endless, and of course all false.

    It is starting to get sorta irritating and although I signed papers to not pursue further damages, I didn't sign papers with the intention they would lie to me on the phone, obfuscate the return or just simply ignore my phone calls, which I am starting to consider that the offer was in bad faith.

    They better start responding to my inquiries about my 2015 TDI or I am going to get an attorney and sue them based on bargaining in bad faith.

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Buyback of Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clearly, if they say your paperwork is not complete, then you have not agreed to settle out of court and you can go ahead as though you did not reply to their settlement.

    2. Re: Buyback of Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what you get when you deal with the Germans. You should have known better. They are simply too evil to be believed.

    3. Re:Buyback of Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they've actually taken too long (I forget how long they can take to process the claim), reach out to the lawyers representing the owners in the class-action lawsuit. They are there to represent you, and you don't have to pay anything for their help.

      There have been a mix of reports with completing the buyback - some claims get processed without any problem, while others need some nudging by the lawyers.

  19. STOP USING "-GATE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I refuse to comment on anything that uses that ridiculous suffix.

    1. Re:STOP USING "-GATE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for CMOS-gate

    2. Re:STOP USING "-GATE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I refuse to comment on a comment that thinks "-gate" suffexes are ridiculous!

    3. Re:STOP USING "-GATE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, you commented on this......

  20. Values volkswagon holds dear by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Look- it's clear from their behavior that volks wagon doesn't hold any values dear except making a profit.
    They are an amoral, asocial corporation.

    The instant their feet are not to the fire, they will return to being amoral and asocial.

    Put the CEO and management in prison for 6 months.

    THEN the volkswagon corporation may have concious because future CEO's and management will know they are personally at risk.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Values volkswagon holds dear by epine · · Score: 1

      "volkswagon" here, "volks wagon" there but still you managed to type THEN in all-caps. Function key assignment? Here's a suggestion: add another function key for VW.

      Seriously, after "Volkwagon" in the article title, the powers that be don't need any further assistance.

  21. Finally! by BenBoy · · Score: 1

    Finally; now, at last, Volkswagen will be thrown in jail like it deserves. In an orange, VW shaped jumpsuit, I assume. Oh, and the fines; that will surely punish those ... um, mutual funds, maybe? Finally, justice, just like we all hoped. Now let's all take a deep breath (or, [cough], maybe not just yet).

  22. Volkswagen apparently values fraud by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    I'd say things are pretty easy on VW considering what they should have had to produce for all of their customers (complete corresponding source code including build tools licensed under a free software license or, for the cars that never should have been sold in the first place, buy-back of the car at whatever price the person paid).

    Management is eager to get this behind them in a way where people think it's over and done with, but there's no reason to trust any of the auto manufacturers involved in the conspiracy (not just VW used code designed to fool tests). VW's got self-driving cars to try to position (they appear to be pushing this concept now) and sell, after all. Can't have memories of how they ripped off customers lingering in the minds and 'tainting' future products, even though that's precisely what's fair and reasonable for would-be customers to do.

    1. Re:Volkswagen apparently values fraud by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Slightly off-topic, but has anyone else seen the slew of ads by Samsung lately? They are trying to save face by advertising some 8-point battery inspection - while showing videos of a nail being driven through the battery and at least one heat test. The monologue is "we take your safety first which is why we blah blah blah". It's a blatant attempt to save face after the multi-billion dollar fiasco from last year.

      I'm more surprised that VW finally admitted guilt after many years of fighting and pointing blame at mid and low level employees. Of course their PR spin is going to be something like "This is against everything we value... We've changed, please take us back". The court of public opinion can be very harsh, but the punishments are generally very short term. It's only a matter of months before John Q. Public takes that crazy cheating ex-gf back.

  23. Typo in heading by skirmish666 · · Score: 1

    Volkwagen Fnally Plads Gilty N 'Dieselgte' Chrges - FTFY

    --
    Sigger than your average
  24. When will the others admit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Volkswagen was rather quick to acknowledge the cheat and start working on a solution, but none of the other brands that were caught doing the same have so far admitted that their cars contain defeat devices, despite clear evidence and ongoing criminal proceedings. One wonders if it was a wise choice for VW to fess up and deal with the consequences. The others may have saved themselves many billions by denying and claiming that their defeat devices serve to protect the engine...

  25. It's not a quality thing. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    because they are lower quality than most other cars.

    That if, if anything only a small part of the issue.

    American cars are built with the needs and desires of American customers, American roads, American gasoline and American parking spaces in mind.

    Elsewhere in the world:

    a) You don't drive a pickup truck to haul your tools and supplies if you're a small business, you drive a van or an actual small truck.

    b) You want a car that fits into the local parking spaces. Which in most places are smaller than American ones.

    c) You want a car that's designed for local speed limits, which may be higher than the speed limits in the US.

    d) You want a car that makes optimal use of the locally available gasoline. In Europe, that's usually higher octane rating stuff than in the US.

    e) You want a stick shifter if you're used to it. Stick shifters are almost nonexistent in the US, while still fairly common in Europe.

    f) You may not want an AC, especially in countries that don't become as hot and humid as parts of the US do.

  26. Should have pulled out of the US market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Volkswagen should have told the American authorities to stick their fines wherever they like and pulled out of the US market completely. They may have bought it of at great cost this time, but sooner later the Americans will find or invent something else to steal billions again. Someone should send a message that it is time for them to repair their legal system and that agressive regulatory agencies functioning as a thinly-veiled protectionism tool scares away foreign investors and jobs. Playing along and handing over many billions of hard-earned money may make the problem go away for now, but it sends the wrong message entirely and is unlikely to do any good in the long term.

    1. Re:Should have pulled out of the US market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astroturfing? Fanboi? I'm not sure which this is.

      Are you disputing they broke the law? Are you saying VW is too big to break such laws?

      This reeks of someone doesn't know history and the way companies can not give a shit about people. I say don't let them do business in the states for X years.

    2. Re:Should have pulled out of the US market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I am saying that fines should be proportionate and reasonable, that likewise cases should be treated in a similar way and that regulatory compliance should not be abused as a tool for protectionism.

    3. Re:Should have pulled out of the US market by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Shut up, Kraut.

    4. Re:Should have pulled out of the US market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solid argument.