Slashdot Mirror


Typo In IP Address Led To an Innocent Father's Arrest For Paedophilia (buzzfeed.com)

An anonymous reader has shared a shocking story about the arrest of Nigel Lang by the British police for a crime he didn't commit. It all happened because of a typo, according to a report. From the report: On a Saturday morning in July 2011, Nigel Lang, then aged 44, was at home in Sheffield with his partner and their 2-year-old son when there was a knock at the door. He opened it to find a man and two women standing there, one of whom asked if he lived at the address. When he said he did, the three strangers pushed past him and one of the women, who identified herself as a police officer, told Lang and his partner he was going to be arrested on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children. [...] He was told that when police requested details about an IP address connected to the sharing of indecent images of children, one extra keystroke was made by mistake, sending police to entirely the wrong physical location. But it would take years, and drawn-out legal processes, to get answers about why this had happened to him, to force police to admit their mistake, and even longer to begin to get his and his family's lives back on track. Police paid Lang 60,000 British Pound ($73,500) in compensation last autumn after settling out of court, two years after they finally said sorry and removed the wrongful arrest from his record.

21 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Only $73,500? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe this is the lawsuit happy American in me talking, but $73,500 sounds like chump change for a mistake that could quite literally ruin your life even after a retraction.

    1. Re:Only $73,500? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd start off with a $10M asking. I'd settle for about half of that.

      first, punishment that is EXPENSIVE will tend to teach the authorities their lessons.

      second, you may be unemployable for the rest of your life by this mistake; I'd need about 2-5million to be able to retire and live on.

      not my mistake; I should not have to pay a dime for THEIR stupidity.

      ip address does not equal a person. even more so when they don't even bother to check their work BEFORE A LIFE IS RUINED.

      what would fix this: remove the safety net for public 'authority figures' and when they screw up, let their own insurance cover the costs. if they had to pay, directly, they'd surely think twice before going off half-assed on a witch hunt.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Only $73,500? by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      £60,000 is a joke amount of money. It's not just the hurt and devastation it has caused but there has to be some kind of deterrence in the future.

    3. Re:Only $73,500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      first, punishment that is EXPENSIVE will tend to teach the authorities their lessons.

      I'm not sure that is true. The police officers and officials pay nothing. It's the tax payers. I agree with the compensation, but it should come out of the police officials' personal pockets. Otherwise, there is no lesson for them to learn. It's not their money.

    4. Re:Only $73,500? by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, in no way does the 'police department' feel any pain

      It does at the level of elected officials. The community will remember that this sheriff or mayor cost them million$ in extra taxes thanks to their police department's incompetence. They will get voted out and their replacement will clean the fuckups out of the department.

      Oh, sorry. I forgot about the police unions.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  2. Re:familyâ(TM)s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Still can't edit posts either. Slashdot is a fucking relic.

  3. Chump change for years of a ruined life by James+Carnley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Say what you will about lawsuits in America but they sure do work great for cases like this. This poor guy has years of his life completely ruined and will possibly have people hate him for the rest of his life because of the implication. Also this kind of stuff still shows up on background checks even if it's removed from your record. I would bet good money that he will have a harder time finding work in the future.

    Does 1 year's salary make up for that? It sure wouldn't for me.

  4. IP Addresses Again by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's quite scary how sure people are of what an IP address will tell them. There are any number of reasons why it doesn't provide much, if any evidence. You need a lot more than that, especially in a criminal case.

  5. Re:Zero tolerance has failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Noble? It doesn't take much imagination to see how zero tolerance does more harm than good. A half-baked measure based more on emotion and fear than reasoning? Sure, but punishing the innocent 'just in case' is in no way noble.

  6. Real problem is demonization of sex crimes by gurps_npc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sex crimes are horrible - but not worse than murder.

    Western culture has demonized it by spreading lies and falsehoods. The truth is:

    1) People convicted of sex crimes are LESS likely to commit more crimes than other criminals (this includes pedophiles).

    2) Most people convicted of 'sex crimes' are normal, healthy people, not strange perverts.

    3) Sex crimes are incredibly subjectively prosecuted. Homosexuals are likely to be arrested, tried and convicted for the exact same behavior that straight men or women would be ignored at (for example, asking someone out for a date => soliciting prostitution) Teenagers routinely create 'child pornography' and usually (but not if the prosecutor dislikes you), have it swept under the rug.

    4) Sex, being something people are ashamed of, is often used by the police to legally extort people into confessing to crimes they did not do in order to avoid sex crime charges.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Real problem is demonization of sex crimes by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sex crime by definition means you're a pervert.

      A few decades ago, simply being homosexual made you a sex criminal. Laws change as do individual ethics. I'm sure here on Slashdot we could point out a few things in current legislation that shouldn't be there.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re: Real problem is demonization of sex crimes by green1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That depends. If you're talking the 45 year old who has sex with a 6 year old, then yes. You're absolutely correct. But that's not where the definitions end, and there's a lot more grey area involved. For example, an 18 year old having consensual sex with their 17 year old partner is committing a sex crime in several jurisdictions (adjust for the cut-off ages in various areas). Is that "physical and psychological abuse"?

      The issue with "sex crimes" is that they are treated on an emotional level before a practical one, with no consideration for circumstances, and they WILL ruin your life if you're even accused, no trial or conviction necessary.

    3. Re:Real problem is demonization of sex crimes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      5) Getting caught pissing behind the bushes can get you on the Sex Registry.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  7. Re:familyâ(TM)s by Khyber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " they already know that the low ID lusers like you will keep coming back filling their pockets with ad revenue "

    Yea, right. Pretty much all of us low-UID "lusers' are smart enough to use adblockers and script blockers so they don't get shit from us.

    Leave it to an AC to be wrong as always.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  8. Re:familyâ(TM)s by Khyber · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Agreed, and not being able to edit a post (for even a 1-minute grace period) is fucking embarrassing"

    What's more embarrassing is your inability to proof-read before submitting off the fucking handle like the majority of you tend to do.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  9. Re:familyâ(TM)s by PPH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    not being able to edit a post

    That's what the Preview button is for.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Re:Zero tolerance has failed by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The intersection of the set of people who call for zero tolerance and the set of people who understand real analysis and binary classifiers is empty.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  11. Re:Zero tolerance has failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, yes, that's how all totalitarian states start. After all the Nazis started with noble ideals: economic equality and fairness, free public education, universal healthcare, government retirement benefits, an end to unearned income (capital gains etc.), and nationalization of important industries. It inevitably led to corruption, theft, violence, war, and eventually genocide.

    You forgot their desire to be strong, to avenge their defeats, to crush the threats to their safety, to purify their identity, and other motivations that were actually what lead towards corruption, theft, violence, war, and most importantly, genocide.

    If the Nazi's had stuck with their other ideas, the world would have been better off, but you see, it was their pride, their anger, their resentment, that drove them, not their more positive ideals.

    It's ok though, I understand you have to justify your own weaknesses and faults, after all, if people inevitably turn to the negative in life, you can't be blamed for your choices to enrich yourself and disadvantage others, it's entirely natural.

  12. Re:The fix is in by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just port the fix from Soylent News

    It's been fixed there for months. And it's open source! Take it!

    --
    That is all.
  13. Re:The U.K. Pedophile suspicion fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Started in the late 80s with Pedogeddon spread by religious nutjobs because they couldn't ban sex before marriage.
    Now porn is being blamed and universally blocked by default on most internet connections by these awful prudes like Claire Perry and her kind.

    Sexual demonization has brought up a country of socially inept retards.
    Not just here, but in many Christian nations.
    No wonder the "white race is dying" is a thing, it literally is. They've been brought up in to hating their own bodies by absolute nutjobs of the highest order.
    Even in Britain which is becoming less religious with time, it is still a huge taboo.

    Teen sex is now so demonized that parents have disowned their children over it. It's fucking ridiculous.
    I knew plenty of people in my teens that had had sex around 12-15 age range, none of them grew up in to complete fuck-ups or psychos, or murders and rapists.
    Very little of them had children in their teens either, most waited till mid or late 20s.

    In the case of child porn, it is such a double taboo that even accidentally coming across it can get you arrested if someone hates you.
    Even being a moderator can get you arrested, a person that actively seeks to remove dodgy content!
    Look at that Internet Watch Foundation bullshit years back where they blocked the Virgin Killer stuff from Wikipedia, all because some nutjob reported it to them. But the MAIN reason it got blocked? IWF never verified SHIT. They legally weren't allowed to, they could get arrested for it. THAT'S how fucking retarded the UK laws are right now.
    Then just recently there, Facebook reporting BBC to police because FB had CP on their site and refused to remove it for a significant period of time. They sent the links to them and they tried to claim that was distributing child porn. Fucking. Retarded.

  14. Really bad police work by istartedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Without bothering RTFA, this sounds like horrendously bad police work and he should get a much bigger settlement. Hitting that IP address warrants surveillance, not arrest. After some nominal period of time looking at his traffic, they would have realized it was an anomaly and nobody outside the precinct would have known about it.

    In real cases of pedo that get a conviction, there are usually whole hard-drives full of disgusting stuff that gives agents PTSD. You can't get that with a typo.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?