Slashdot Mirror
Australia Copyright Safe Harbour Provision Backed By Prime Minister (torrentfreak.com)
Moves to introduce a copyright "safe harbor" provision for platforms such as Google and Facebook have received a boost in Australia after receiving backing from Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull. From a report on TorrentFreak: A report in The Australian indicates that Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has given the safe harbor amendments his support. It won't be all plain sailing from here, however. The government is to set up a Senate committee into the copyright amendments to determine whether the amendments will promote piracy as the entertainment industries are warning. The inquiry will launch after the government introduces the Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Bill into Parliament after March 20. The Australian suggests that under Schedule 2 of the bill, online platforms would receive immunity for infringing user-uploaded content. However, totally immunity is an unrealistic eventuality that would almost certainly have to be tempered by rules concerning takedowns. Those details will be examined in-depth as part of the committee inquiry, which will run its course in advance of parliamentary debate and voting.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull; good man...
CAP === 'emeralds'
Encourage the growth of the propaganda outlets the better to control the useful idiots.
Or is it just totally benign?
But when was the last time you knew a politician to do something out of the goodness of their hearts?
Copyright is an artificial construct. For its existence to be justified, it must at the very least be self-sustainable. i.e. If the money copyright holders collects isn't enough to pay for copyright to exist, there is no point in allowing copyright to exist.
So if we get rid of safe harbor provisions as the Copyright industry wants, then the logical thing to do is for the government to collect a fee from all copyright holders and distribute that money to ISPs and websites to pay for copyright enforcement. Doing it the way the Copyright industry wants - where enforcement costs are completely externalized and not borne by the Copyright industry - can result in a situation where the economic cost of enforcing copyright (borne by ISPs and websites) exceeds the economic benefit of having copyright (enjoyed by the Copyright industry). At that point, the economic reason for having Copyright (to promote economic progress and activity) ceases to exist.
"Australia Copyright Safe Harbour Provision Backed By Prime Minister"
Am I the only one that read this as "Australia Copyright Safe Harbour Provision Hacked By Prime Minister"
I was like, "Whaaaaaaaaaaat?"
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
A plane crashed on a farm in the middle of Outback Queensland. ."
Panic stricken, the local Police mobilized and descended on the farm in force.
When they got there, the aircraft was totally destroyed with only a burned hull left smoldering in a tree line that bordered the farm.
The Sergeant and his men entered the smoking mess but could find no remains of anyone.
They spotted the farmer mustering cattle not too far away as if nothing had happened.
They hurried over to the man's Horse.
"Gordon," the police Sergeant yelled, panting and out of breath. "Did you see this terrible plane accident happen?"
"Yeah. Sure did," the farmer mumbled unconcerned, getting off the Horse.
"Do you realize that is the Prime Ministers Jet ?"
" Sure do
"Were there any survivors?"
"Naah. They's all got killed straight out," the farmer answered.
"I buried them all myself. Took me most of the morning."
"Is the Prime minister dead?" the Sergreant asked.
"Well," the farmer grumbled, . "He kept saying he wasn't but you know how that bastard lies."
It could depend on later changes to terms like:
Removing DRM.
Creating a new file once DRM was removed. Uploading that new file.
Downloading and uploading any file or copy.
Downloading.
Having a copy in your possession without uploading.
Also who can detect and report any files of interest?
Your OS? Anti virus? A public/private partnership with police powers can track your ip and scan a computer?
Can any app scan your computer and report file checksums?
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Basically a proposed law to protect big companies from being sued for user uploaded copyright infringements. Whatever. Nothing to see here. Where are the fair use provisions for everyone instead of crap just for big companies?
Can any app scan your computer and report file checksums?
If you look at the Australian Tax Office app the T&Cs make it quite clear that the app will accesses and use your phone to the limit the law will allow. This includes, not only scanning your files and checksums, but also scanning your networks for other computers where your phone is now a platform to inspect those machines as well.
Obviously your GPS position, other wi fi networks and bluetooth devices.
People talk about the surveillance state. Well it is prototyped in Australia where there is no Bill of Rights comparable to the US, UK or Canada. Meta data retention laws are real in Australia and the Burr-Feinstein Bill introduced in the US was a constitutionally compatible versions of it that spoke about encryption, however it was actually about meta-data retention.
Spying powers in Australia are very advanced.
My ism, it's full of beliefs.
The safe harbor is not a bad thing, even if it is just what the money wants.
But there are other issues in Copyright. Like importing the USA Fair Use provisions that Wikipedia Oz is discussing campaigning for. Or the micky mouse 70 year rule. Or, more importantly, the ridiculous copyright protections to works that are unpublished or not available here in a reasonable time.
Not a peep. Didn't think so.