Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Becomes Third Best-Selling General Purpose Computer of All Time, Beating Commodore 64 (raspberrypi.org)

The Raspberry Pi has outsold the Commodore 64 by selling north of 12.5 million boards in five years, becoming the world's third best-selling general purpose computer. "The Commodore 64, had, until recently, the distinction of being the third most popular general purpose computing platform," Eben Upton told a crowd at the fifth birthday party. "That's what I'm here to celebrate," he said, "we are now the third most popular general purpose computing platform after the Mac and PC." The MagPi Magazine reports: The Raspberry Pi Model 3 is the best-selling Raspberry Pi. This chart shows that Raspberry Pi 3 has accounted for almost a third of all Raspberry Pi boards sold. The Model 3 sits next to its immediate predecessor, the Raspberry Pi 2B+ (which has the same board shape but a slightly slower CPU). These two boards account for over half of all Raspberry Pi boards sold. The rest of the sales are between older models. The original Model A accounts for just 2 percent of sales. So keep one if you've got it as they're pretty rare. We should point out, before the Commodore fan club arrives, that there are discrepancies in the total number of sales of the C64. The 12.5 million figure comes from an analysis of serial numbers. This article by Michael Steil explains in detail why the 12.5 million number is accurate. We hold it to be the most accurate analysis of Commodore 64 sales (other opinions are available).

145 comments

  1. Beating Commodore 64!!?! by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Say it ain't so!!

    1. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by narcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These numbers are crazy. They're probably counting sales and not use.

      Surely, most Pi's are just used as cheap C64 emulation machines, letting the C64 continue to reign supreme. (Those not being used as a replacement C64 are all obviously just collecting dust in a drawer.)

    2. Re: Beating Commodore 64!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if this a joke or not but it is to some degree true. Many people do in fact use Keyrah boards with a Raspberry Pi and the Combian distribution to "ressurect" non-working C64 systems.

      In fact, I would say the Pi owes it's popularity to Retrogaming/Computing enthusiasts.

      -JaceFuse

    3. Re: Beating Commodore 64!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh i bought mine for embedded builds/simulation hobbyist and robotics projects, most of the people i was around who were into the scene were just Linux people who jumped at the novelty of a $25 Linux computer.

      I have a drawer full of Model B's collecting dust.

    4. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by dwywit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I get the joke, but mine is a very effective headless, X-less torrent client and media server. It streams internet radio into the home stereo, and without the buffering issues that Windows machines seem to have. I can add a Linux ISO to the torrent queue and forget about it until I actually want to try it out.

      Both of which could be handled by an old laptop running Windows or Debian, of course, but not for the price and energy consumption of the Pi.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    5. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      They're probably counting sales and not use.

      I can confirm. I have:
      * 3x Raspberry Pi 1 Model B
      * 1x Raspberry Pi 1 Model A+
      * 1x Raspberry Pi 2
      * 2x Raspberry Pi 3
      * 2x Raspberry Pi Zero

      Out of these 10, I am using 2. I have one in an actual project and one running as a server because I had an extra static IP and couldn't think of anything useful to do with it.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So that just confirms that 9 of them were sold to a tinkere without a plan, nothing more.

      Personally I have 2 Pi 2s and 1 Pi 3. All in active use.

    7. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It ain't so.

      They're mixing the different Raspberry Pi models together as one thing, and then counting all the 80386 or 8052 computers as different. It may even be that it is such apples/oranges that it is impossible to do an honest "head to head" type comparison, considering those types of differences in what is being measured. It may be that they would have to count all the "Intel Pentium" computers as one to count all the Raspberry Pi computers as the same, or maybe everything that Gateway or Dell ever sold.

      It is a non-metric, offered by a press release. This is the new slashdot; not even clueful enough to find some clickbait, and just linking directly to press releases as factual stories.

    8. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by rochrist · · Score: 1

      They also make excellent Acorn emulators along with RiscOS.

    9. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      These numbers are crazy. They're probably counting sales and not use.

      Do you have anything to base that wild assumption on, apart from the phrase "Best-Selling" in the headline?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you like to think you're the center of the technical world or you wouldn't have bothered to point out your single case scenario but for everyone like you there are a couple hundred RaspPis sitting in drawers that got a grand average use of 4 hours in their life. Not that narcc makes a truly compelling argument but few Pis are really being used for more than a gamers emulator. Sad but true.

    11. Re:Beating Commodore 64!!?! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I don't think my case is all that unusual. I think there are a lot of Pi's collecting dust these days.

      The audio output left a lot to be desired, and the codec hats were rather pricey. So that killed off one of the projects I had in mind.

      The 3x Pi1's were for a Plan 9 cluster. But the buggy usb support on Plan 9 kept taking out the whole system and I was too busy with my day job to do more than hack a way around it. The results were not great and I was never able to move from Plan 9 to Inferno (which was the original goal.

      If only there were a site like hackaday, except where we could post our failed and abandoned projects. Maybe too depressing.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  2. So all models vs like two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, if you're going to get to count all different things branded as "Rasberry Pi" in aggregate... seems a bit unfair but ok, I'm sure that's some sort of achievement.

    1. Re:So all models vs like two? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      In fairness, the first and second positions are occupied by PC and Mac which are kind of board categories themselves, especially PC! In fact, I think since Apple switched to Intel, those should really be counted as PCs and therefore the Mac number, whilst still undoubtedly huge, should remain static, and possibly passable by Rasp-pi some time in the future. Not sure the top position would ever be achievable though!

    2. Re:So all models vs like two? by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would be counting every Audi A4 ever made and proclaiming that it's the best selling car ever because the combined total was more than the 2013 Honda Accord. Not really.

  3. Which computer is in first place? by supremebob · · Score: 0

    If the Raspberry Pi is the second most popular computer (dubious claim considering that there are several models of it), and the Commodore 64 is the third most popular computer, what is considered to be the most popular computer of all time? My hunch would be the Apple II, but I wouldn't be surprised if iMac was on the top 5 list.

    1. Re:Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably iPhone. Total android sales are bigger but not any individual model.

    2. Re:Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the second place? It is telling how they refuse to tell the truth about the better selling first and second models since they know they're lying in order to project their hated of the C64 since it was a great computer that normal people loved since they hate it since they're ignorant morons.

    3. Re:Which computer is in first place? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      LOL yeah NO. almost every single model of the Samsung Galaxy is massive outsold the pi, from that alone you can safely say they aren't including smartphones or even most computer lines, actually the whole claim looks to be bullshit as they are comparing multi pi versions against a single version of one system.

    4. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL yeah right, we have a whole active commodore community inside MS. hate MS if you like, but telling lies makes you look like an ignorant zealot and is just sad.

    5. Re: Which computer is in first place? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      You do know that Mic4rosoft wrote the Commodore 64 Basic?

    6. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is nothing more than a troll so I doubt he knows much about MS or the C64. Microsoft still have very active C64 communities and it is a well loved and respected piece of hardware. Anyone that has one or plays/works with them if anything is even more respected,

    7. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did not. The text Microsoft doesn't even appear on:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_64

      But the text "It is listed in the Guinness World Records as the highest-selling single computer model of all time," does. It is the best selling computer model of all time, and Microsoft had nothing to do with it. That is why it is so popular because it just worked unlike every product Microsoft has ever touch which doesn't work well at all. They have always made garbage.

    8. Re: Which computer is in first place? by gravewax · · Score: 0

      For fucks sake retard go back in your fucking hole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    9. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did not which is proven by the fact that C64 Basic worked unlike anything that Microsoft has attempted.

    10. Re: Which computer is in first place? by gravewax · · Score: 1
    11. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did not.

    12. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commodore was founded 21 years before that crappy Microsoft company. Commodore had Basic years before Gates was even in college.

    13. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80s kids were soiled by computers that worked.

    14. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Desler · · Score: 1

      This isn't even good trolling.

    15. Re: Which computer is in first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean spoiled. I loved computers that could keep up with my typing unlike Windows.

    16. Re: Which computer is in first place? by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      MS wrote Basic 1.0 for Commodore, C64 has Basic 2.0, which at the time they were up to 4.0 but the C64 didn't have the memory for 4.0, so they put 2.0 in the C64. Every version of Basic on the Commodore computers were written by Commodore except 1.0. When the C128 was released MS was big enough to tell Commodore they wanted they NAME on it again.

  4. Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Updated Mar 13, 2017)

    The goal of this report is to make the existence of Intel CPU backdoors a common knowledge and provide information on backdoor removal.

    What we know about Intel CPU backdoors so far:

    TL;DR version

    Your Intel CPU and Chipset is running a backdoor as we speak.

    The backdoor hardware is inside the CPU/Bridge and the backdoor firmware (Intel Management Engine) is in the chipset flash memory.

    30C3 Intel ME live hack:
    @21m43s, keystrokes leaked from Intel ME above the OS, wireshark failed to detect packets.
    [Video Link] 30C3: Persistent, Stealthy, Remote-controlled Dedicated Hardware Malware
    [Quotes] Vortrag:
    "DAGGER exploits Intel's Manageability Engine (ME), that executes firmware code such as Intel's Active Management Technology (iAMT), as well as its OOB network channel."

    "the ME provides a perfect environment for undetectable sensitive data leakage on behalf of the attacker."

    "We have recently improved DAGGER's capabilites to include support for 64-bit operating systems and a stealthy update mechanism to download new attack code."

    "To be more precise, we show how to conduct a DMA attack using Intel's Manageability Engine (ME)."

    "We can permanently monitor the keyboard buffer on both operating system targets."

    Quotes on Intel backdoors:

    A message from RMS
    by Richard Stallman on Dec 29, 2016 09:45 AM

    The current generation of Intel and AMD processor chips are designed with vicious back doors that users cannot shut off. (In Intel processors, it's the "management engine".)

    No users should trust those processors.

    Backdoor removal:
    The backdoor firmware can be removed by following this guide using the me_cleaner script.
    Removal requires a Raspberry Pi (with GPIO pins) and a SOIC clip.

    Decoding Intel backdoors:
    The situation is out of control and the Libreboot/Coreboot community is looking for BIOS/Firmware experts to help with the Intel ME decoding effort.

    If you are skilled in these areas, download Intel ME firmwares from this collection and have a go at them, beware Intel is using a lot of counter measures to prevent their backdoors from being decoded (explained below).

    Useful links:
    The Intel ME subsystem can take over your machine, can't be audited
    REcon 2014 - Intel Management Engine Secrets
    Untrusting the CPU (33c3)
    Towards (reasonably) trustworthy x86 laptops
    30C3 To Protect And Infect - The militarization of the Internet
    30c3: To Protect And Infect Part 2 - Mass Surveillance Tools & Software

    1. Introduction, what is Intel ME

    Short version, from Intel staff:

    Re: What Intel CPUs lack Intel ME secondary processor?
    Amy_Intel Feb 8, 2016 9:27 AM

    The Management Engine (ME) is an isolated and p

  5. A Raw single Board Computer compared to a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a real stretch. A PC Board compared to a Product. Why Not Arduinos?
    Or is thid like Pluto and they are Dwarf Computers.

  6. Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by mykepredko · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seems like a bit of a stretch to call it that. There are the basic features I would consider a "General Purpose" computer to have (and, to be fair, the Raspberry Pi has many of them):
    - Wall (or POE) Power Supply
    - SSD/HHD (the SD Card of the Raspberry Pi could probably be considered that)
    - USB Ports for Keyboard/Mouse (Raspberry Pi has that)
    - Video Output (Raspberry Pi has that)
    - Network Connection (Raspberry Pi has that)
    - Ready to use OS (I guess Raspberry Pi could be considered to have that with Raspbian)

    More philosophically, I would consider a General Purpose computer to be one that you take out of the box, plug in and turn on - the Raspberry Pi really doesn't fit that use case which makes it hard for me to consider it a "General Purpose" computer.

    I would consider it to be a very successful "Custom Purpose" computer, however.

    1. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, who's definition of "computer" are you using? Because none of those are requirements for a device to be called a general purpose computer.

    2. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I don't see how you can call it custom purpose but not general purpose.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not sure of what I would consider my exact definition of a general purpose computer but I would definitely not include A Pi in it. I love my Pi but it is a specialist device, enthusiast device or such, it certainly isn't general purpose, it tends to be more custom specialised purpose.

    4. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by zmooc · · Score: 1

      According to my definition of refrigerators, the Raspberry Pi is one. The thing with definitions is you cannot just make them up.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    5. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      I call the Raspberry Pi "Custom Purpose" simply because if you look at 90%+ of the advertised uses for it, they are just that, controlling machinery, kiosks, etc.

      Just look here: http://makezine.com/2013/04/14...

      Now, see how many of these types of projects your basic Dell system unit is used in.

    6. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rpi is missing one of the most important features for a general purpose computer:

      - Non-DIY hardware switch to initiate software shutdown / safe unmount of SD card (it's really not convenient to attach a network cable so you can ssh in and do sudo shutdown -h now every time you're going to move it).
      - USB core that doesn't have a critical hardware flaw that was known in model 1A but wasn't fixed in the model B or B+, and still hasn't been fixed years later in the model 2 or 3 (aka I hope you're not depending on the USB or anything that uses it -- including wired ethernet, because if so sooner or later you will be bitten by the bug.)
      - Real time clock (ntp helps, but the pi really needs a RTC).
      - Hardware division instruction (try compiling int div(int a, int b) { return a / b; }, then look at the disassembly and cry)

    7. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Okay, where is the accepted definition of "General Purpose Computer"?

      In response to the term "General Purpose Computer" used in TFA, I used what I would consider a definition and compare the Raspberry Pi to it to decide whether or not it fit the definition.

      If I ask Google "general purpose computer definition" I get 8.17 million results - if you read them, you'll see answers that include devices ranging from mainframes to smartphones to single board computers (and, I imagine, if I were to go far enough, I'd find some System On Chips (SOCs) that met somebody's definition as well).

      If you have a better definition or know where there is an "official" one, put it here and it can be discussed.

    8. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by zmooc · · Score: 1

      Well most of your 8.17 million results probably agree on what these things are: computers that you can you use for many purposes. As opposed to computers you can only use for a specific purpose, like cars, washing machines, gaming consoles, dumbphones and toothbrushes.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    9. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Come on now, get with the program. This is how the game is played these days. Carefully craft a metric that puts you at the top of the heap.

    10. Re: Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not sure i agree. i buy components for my general purpose desktop computer starting with the mobo. what you are explaining is a prebuilt.

    11. Re: Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good point it could be used as a general all purpose just strap ot to the back of your monitor though underwelming in performance but it could do the job if you wanted.

    12. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Repentinus · · Score: 4, Informative

      A general purpose computer is simply a computer that can be used to compute any computable function when space and time constraints are ignored. Your phone is a general purpose computer. The opposite of that would be an application-specific integrated circuit or general purpose hardware locked down to running a limited set of applications.

    13. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we go by your list of criteria for a general purpose computer, most of the '80s would be wiped from consideration, meaning the C-64 is off the list.

      • SSD/HDD: out of the box, C-64 and Apple II, arguably the top machines of the era, included no storage at all. (I'm not counting cassette.)
      • Ports for keyboard/mouse: All the early PCs had keyboards, generally built into the case. Mice weren't a consideration until later in the game.
      • Network connection: the closest thing to that at the time would have been a modem and those were optional accessories.

      The RPi is easily comparable in its offerings to the early general purpose computers. The ones I've bought have been near-complete packages -- Pi, case, power supply, heatsinks, NOOBS-on-a-card. Assembling and booting up the Pis required less time and effort than did my first Apple II.

    14. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ready to use OS (I guess Raspberry Pi could be considered to have that with Raspbian)

      RISC OS is the operating system for ARM since 1987.

      It is still available today for the Raspberry Pi.

    15. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More philosophically, I would consider a General Purpose computer to be one that you take out of the box, plug in and turn on - the Raspberry Pi really doesn't fit that use case which makes it hard for me to consider it a "General Purpose" computer.

      It really sounds that your philosophical definition of "general purpose" is closer to the definiton of an "appliance".

    16. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A general purpose computer is simply a computer that can be used to compute any computable function when space and time constraints are ignored.

      Doesn't that rule all the hardware locked devices out which do prevent the user from running some functions without asking permission in form of signed binary from external party?

    17. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Well, I kinda disagree with your definitions but I see where you're coming from.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    18. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're talking about.

      educate yourself: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+a+General+Purpose+computer

    19. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      More philosophically, I would consider a General Purpose computer to be one that you take out of the box, plug in and turn on - the Raspberry Pi really doesn't fit that use case which makes it hard for me to consider it a "General Purpose" computer.

      Why doesn't it fit that use case? You can buy it at the shops complete with wall power and memory card pre-loaded with a running OS.
      Just attach a screen keyboard and mouse and plug it in and turn it on.

      It's no less of a general purpose computer than any other. Actually it's more so because it takes far less time and effort to get Raspberian started on a freshly bought raspberry pi than Windows 10 on a freshly bought PC.

    20. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, keep it up.

      I love watching idiots argue pedantic nitpicky points that literally DO NOT MATTER at all, to anyone.

    21. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You can order one with the OS already installed on the SD card. Take it out of the box, plug in keyboard, mouse, hdmi cable, ethernet cable or use wifi and plug in the power. It's up and running in seconds.

    22. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    23. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      If you buy a bare Pi you have a bit of work to do to have a complete general purpose computer. That's appropriate because many of them are sold for embedded systems rather than to be used that way. But people are more computer savvy now and most don't find it a challenge to gather the other parts; if you want something simpler you can buy a complete kit that has it all (Pi board, case, NOOBS card, power supply) in the package. Still a touch of assembly required: you have to put the NOOBS card in the board and the board in the case.

      You also have to provide your own keyboard, mouse, and display. (Name brand desktop systems come with a keyboard and mouse, but the display is still a separate purchase unless you buy an all-in-one.) Many people already have those things left over from other projects, and if not your local office supply store or electronics store, or Amazon or eBay, will be happy to sell them to you.

    24. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The Pi 3 has hardware divide. Though the software won't take full advantage of it if you use any of the standard OS builds because they're designed to be compatible across the entire range of models; you'll need a built that is made specifically for that model, and if you develop your own software you'll have to choose to generate code specifically for it. The other shortcomings remain.

    25. Re:Is it a "General Purpose Computer"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive me for repeating what others have already said on this thread, but what it comes with and how much work it is to set up have nothing to do with whether it's a "general purpose" computer.

  7. Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is more powerful than the C64.

    1. Re:Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is a 5 year old DVD player. What's your point?

    2. Re:Raspberry Pi by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Really. An 8 bit CPU clocked at 1 megahertz with 64 Kilobytes of RAM of which only 38,911 bytes were free for use by the user. Booted to a command line Basic Interpreter. I fucking loved mine, I still have it and boot it a couple of times a year. Computers are far more useful now but not nearly as much fun. That's what the Raspberry Pi does, it brings the fun back.

  8. dubious claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are going to make a comparison that includes multiple product versions of the Pi then you need to do the same for other manufacturers and frankly I would be shocked if it has outsold any of the big OEM product line series and for the commodore you would also need to include the other models.

  9. Well, not really comparable... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    ...Commodore 64 came complete with a keyboard, power supply and RF modulator / Video out/Audio out - and ready to use.

    And it was sold at a much higher price point, plus it wasn't really a dev-kit like the PI is. The PI is cute, but it's on the level with Arduino (faster of course), and other similar "devboards". So, if we're there - I can imagine there's a lot more sold Arduino Nano V3 Chinese clones sold than all the PI's in the world.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Well, not really comparable... by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Ok you need a keyboard/mouse and power supply but the Pi does give you HDMI ( the present day equivalent of RF/vid/audio).

    2. Re:Well, not really comparable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who thinks the "Arduino" is on the same level as the "RaspberryPi" is retarded.

    3. Re:Well, not really comparable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Commodore 64 came complete with a keyboard, power supply and RF modulator / Video out/Audio out - and ready to use.

      Except for the keyboard, the Pi kits I've bought have included all that plus a storage device. Just because you might choose to buy your Pis piecemeal doesn't mean complete kits can't be easily had.

    4. Re:Well, not really comparable... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      With the power supply its getting to the stage where many people already have one: any old phone charger will do.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Well, not really comparable... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The PI is cute, but it's on the level with Arduino (faster of course), and other similar "devboards".

      No. It is not on the same level with Arduino, it belongs to a much higher level. Arduino is down with STM and PIC, Pi is up with embedded PCs. Before the rise of ARM and the rash of things like Pi we had actual PC-compatible machines in small form factors like PC/104. They were dramatically more expensive, of course, because technology hadn't shrunk everything cheaply yet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Well, not really comparable... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      With the power supply its getting to the stage where many people already have one: any old phone charger will do.

      No, it really won't. If it's a halfway decent phone charger it will do, but the Pi is very picky about its power input. That's just one of the many things that make it a not very good embedded board. You'll often need an additional power supply even if you've already got one. The fact that the USB is still crap is another one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Well, not really comparable... by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Eh. I use a 5 port Anker USB charger and run 3 pi's simultaneously off it with not trouble at all.

    8. Re:Well, not really comparable... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      No, it really won't. If it's a halfway decent phone charger it will do, but the Pi is very picky about its power input. That's just one of the many things that make it a not very good embedded board.

      Those are rather unrelated: for an embedded board you get to choose the PSU as well, so you can just spec out a decent one. That's what I did when I used it embedded.

      I've just got another one (the previous one I used for embedded stuff so I picked a PSU which works fine). I'm going to try it on all my phone chargers and see which work.

      The fact that the USB is still crap is another one.

      For embedded? Depends what you're using the USB for.I was using GPIO and audio, I wasn't using the USB. It's fine for anything not too taxing, but the existence of a decent amount of GPIO makes it decent for a lot of embedded tasks.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  10. Whoa! by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    Congrats RPI! LOVE my Pi3s and Zeros! I makes them into NeaT StufFs! http://www.thingiverse.com/thi...

  11. is he an idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would consider a General Purpose computer to be one that you take out of the box, plug in and turn on

    so basically any computer less than 10 years old is OUT according to your definition because older systems required network cards, sound cards, video cards, RAM, etc. to be installed in the computer first.

    what an idiot

    1. Re:is he an idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gather you must be still a kid if you think that. OEM manufacturers have been around for decades and you have been able to buy general purpose out of the box machines since the 80's/

    2. Re:is he an idiot? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Oh really? Me thinks someone must not be old enough to remember past 10 years ago then, hell Gateway went belly up best part of 15 years ago now.

    3. Re:is he an idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Required a Network card? If you had a network
      Required a sound card? If you played games.
      RAM had to be installed? Where did you shop?

  12. Open firmware by radoni · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Open firmware: https://github.com/christinaa/...

    Coders wanted. Linux bring-up is done, needs USB and display to be more useful. Discussion happens on Freenode IRC #raspberrypi-internals

    When this popular embedded platform has a fully functional open firmware to use instead of the proprietary bootcode.bin then I'll be a little more cheery about the success of the Raspberry Pi worldwide.

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
    1. Re: Open firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be cool and would be easier with this device if they wanted to.

    2. Re:Open firmware by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not ideal but it's still 1000x better and more trustworthy than Intel it AMD systems with their built in rootkits.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  13. Best selling by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    Not a surprise. To run win 10 you need 1000 of them.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Best selling by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      Or zero.

    2. Re:Best selling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 11 install Clippy: "Sorry, personal Windows editions don't support installing into 4000 core, distributed clusters. At this time."

  14. 100% pure BULL SHIT by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is 12.5 million units across how many different models of RPi? If I'm going to count all versions of RPi, what are total sales of Dell Latitude? How many total MacBooks of all versions have been sold?

    Also c64 sold 12-30 million units. Creative misuse of numbers on the RPi part.

    1. Re:100% pure BULL SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " If I'm going to count all versions of RPi, what are total sales of Dell Latitude? How many total MacBooks of all versions have been sold? "
      Umm, they are saying this is #3, behind PCs (#1 by a long long margin) and Macs(#2). All models...

    2. Re:100% pure BULL SHIT by Jason1729 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'll take your word for it, since it doesn't say that in the article.

      Even so it's just more indication that RPi is full of bullshit. Now they're lumping way too many models from way too many companies over 35 years as a single "computer" because taking each product line individually would probably knock RPi off the top 100 list.

      If they want to do the math that way, how dare they not take all the commodore machines together as well putting the total several times higher than RPi.

      Not to mention they're counting the sale of a $5 PCB that needs $30 of support parts 1 for 1 with a complete computer that cost $1500 (corrected to inflation).

      Basically this entire claim by RPi is total bullshit and they deserve to be called out for it.

    3. Re:100% pure BULL SHIT by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 2

      The C64 also has the SX64, C128 (after all it did include the C64), 30 in one Joystick, and the C65, also I most likely missing some other versions of the C64 too. So if your going to include all the different versions of the RPi, you should all include all the different versions of the C64.

    4. Re:100% pure BULL SHIT by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      The C65 was totally different. Not that it matters as there were only a few made.

  15. Ok but... by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 2

    how many C64 do you need to hook up in parralell to get the power of one Pi?

    1. Re:Ok but... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      0.5

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Ok but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      C64 was released in 1982. 1982's Cray supercomputer could do 420 million FLOPs.
      Raspberry Pi's GPU can do 24 GFLOPs. That's equivalent to 57 of 1982's Cray supercomputers.

      http://gaming.wikia.com/wiki/Instructions_per_second lists the C64's MOS Technology 6510 @ 1 MHz as having 0.43 MIPS and 0 MFLOPS.
      Note that the 6510 is an 8-bit CPU, so it would take a ton of instructions to do 32-bit IEEE floating point in software on it.
      I don't know the 6510 instruction set, but it's clear that to simulate a 32-bit fused-multiply-add (FMA) instruction, you'd need at least 32 8-bit instructions.
      My ballpark estimate using software floating point on C64: 24000 / 0.43 * fudge = probably at least 1.8 million C64s to equal one Raspberry pi.

      p.s. If you meant power consumption: about 10 RPIs = one C64.

    3. Re:Ok but... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      MOS Technology 6502: 0.500 MIPS at 1 MHz versus CPU: 4× ARM Cortex-A53: 2458.1 MIPS at 1.2 GHz

      That's what? Almost 5000 times faster? Of course once you start figuring in all the other improvements besides CPU it's really worse than that. People that wanted speed on the C64 learned assembler and they also learned to bang the hardware directly. By the 90s there were some of the Eastern European guys that had been using the 64 for 10 years that could do things the original designers of the C64 couldn't believer were possible. Some of the German hackers I knew when I was stationed there in the 80s were also amazing. I can still spend hours watching demos on the 64 and trying to believe it's a 1mhz computer with 64K of ram.

  16. Re: No comparison to the C64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And the C64 cost $595 (equivalent to $1495 in today's dollars). They aren't comparable.

  17. Re: No comparison to the C64 by fisted · · Score: 1

    Except you could fit the entire C64 in a TQFP package these days - except perhaps the floppy drive - and crank it out for a few cents a pop.

  18. Commodore 64 was a single model by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

    Why not add in the Vic 20, and the 128.

    1. Re:Commodore 64 was a single model by Feneric · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If you're looking at "platform", at least the C128, C128D, 64C, Sx-64, C64GS, C64DTV, and C65 all need to be included as they were all C64 compatible. Note though that the VIC-20 wasn't compatible and shouldn't be included.

    2. Re:Commodore 64 was a single model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the C16, C116 and Plus/4, which were C64 compatible too.

      Also, don*t forget the Educator 64 / PET 64 / CBM 4064-

      The C65 did not make it beyond the prototype stage, it was never released.

    3. Re:Commodore 64 was a single model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the wikipedia page for the Plus/4 you linked to.

      However, it is not compatible with the well-established Commodore 64.

    4. Re:Commodore 64 was a single model by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      Basic programs work sometimes between C64 and Plus/4, but I had a better change of getting C64 basic program to run a 128 than Plus/4.

  19. news flash by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

    News flash! More toy plastic watches are sold than fine Rolexes.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  20. Nintendo DS 154.02 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't count the PlayStation 2 because you can't browse the web with it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_game_consoles

    1. Re: Nintendo DS 154.02 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you could install linux on it.

  21. Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again the Amiga doesn't get it's due.

  22. This is absurdly incorrect on its face by nctritech · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Commodore 64 is "the best-selling home computer of all time" which is based on the fact that the Commodore 64 is a very specific model of computer. The Raspberry Pi 3 IS NOT the same thing as a Raspberry Pi. That's like saying the Commodore 128 is the same thing as the Commodore 64. The C64C was "the same thing" as the C64 because it was a cost-reduced version that was otherwise a completely identical piece of hardware. Each RPi is a completely different computer from the core chip to the peripherals to the I/O.

    Combining all computers that are branded Raspberry Pi and saying they have sold more units combined than the Commodore 64 is one thing, but saying "The Pi has beaten the C64 as the most units of a single computer sold" is an outright lie. The Pi series is also not a computer made for general-purpose use; it's an embedded system, and by that standard I'm willing to bet that there's some model of wireless router that has sold more units than the C64; perhaps the venerable Linksys WRT54G?

    tl;dr: the C64 still holds the crown. The article is based on bullshit logic.

    1. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are mostly correct, with the one exception that the Raspberry Pi is an embedded system. Embedded systems don't come with HDMI output, 3d graphics acceleration, WiFi, Bluetooth, a NIC, four USB ports, audio out, and have both a choice of NOOBs, Debian, and Fedora (workstation, with Gnome 3!) as operating systems.

      I'm not going to claim it is performance driven, or that all of it's distros are as functional as the venerable as other better powered systems, but it is hardly in the same class of embedded systems as the Arduinos.

    2. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by Titanek · · Score: 3, Informative

      This! I was looking for someone to point this out... Pooling all the different versions of the Raspberry Pi together against the C64 doesn't make sense. Instead they should either have pitted the RPi against all of Commodore (including the VIC-20 and earlier, the 64, 128 and all the Amiga models), or held like the RPi 3 against the C64, which has C64 win by 3:1.

    3. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were about 15 different upgrades to the C64 in the ~15 year that it was sold where several components, including the CPU were upgraded.

    4. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For this to be a valid challenge to the C64's record, only ONE model of the raspberry pi would have to beat C64 sales numbers, and then come with the operating system built in and ready to use with a functioning keyboard.

      The Pi just isn't in the same class. It's a great hobby computer board though, and more powerful obviously - but it's not a complete ready-to-use computer when you buy it.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    5. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Embedded systems don't come with HDMI output, 3d graphics acceleration, WiFi, Bluetooth, a NIC, four USB ports, audio out, and have both a choice of NOOBs, Debian, and Fedora (workstation, with Gnome 3!) as operating systems.

      Embedded systems can have any or all of those characteristics. They are simply designed to be embedded in another device, and not stand alone with their own case and power supply. An automotive infotainment system is an embedded computer. And they typically have 3d acceleration today, they certainly have networking, they usually have USB, they obviously have audio out... Or the computerized displays tucked into some otherwise-mechanical slot machines, those are embedded systems, but they're complete computers as well. They tend to run some variant of Windows. They don't have a case, they don't have their own power supply, they're designed to be embedded into a larger system.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by nctritech · · Score: 1

      Commodore released two major variants of the Commodore 64: the Commodore 64 and the cost-reduced Commodore 64C. The C64C used more dense DRAM chips (41464 instead of 4164) and had a case in the C128 style, but it was identical in all functional aspects to the original C64. The original C64 has three variants as well, though to claim that is almost nit-picking since it's the contents of the ROMs that differentiates them.

      Commodore never upgraded the C64. Expansions like an REU were made for it, but those were external devices. The processor upgrades like the SuperCPU were not integrated into the C64. You can't count in this kind of stuff as a change to the system itself.

    7. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by nctritech · · Score: 2

      We can split hairs all day long over this. The Raspberry Pi and its successors are not general-purpose computer systems for the era they are built within. They don't come with a display, keyboard, mouse, they don't have enough RAM to run a modern browser (at least the original Pi doesn't) and even when the RAM was upgraded they still have a pokey ARM chip at the core. The Pi boards are just little bare compute boards. They don't even come with a case or a power supply. They are designed to be embedded devices, not general-purpose computers (in the colloquial sense, not the "it can do more than a highly specialized set of operations" sense.) The Pi is literally nothing more than a cell phone board design modified to expose various ports and GPIO pins. To say that it's a computer is like saying the Apple Watch is a computer. In a strict technical sense it is, but it's not useful to the general public for their day-to-day computing tasks.

      If I reference the HP Pavilion p563w, I'm talking about a complete general-purpose computer with very particular specifications sold to the public under a specific model number. Same thing for the Commodore 64, or the Apple IIe, or the Atari ST 1040. When I say "Raspberry Pi B+" I'm talking about a specific model of embedded processing board. To say that "The Raspberry Pi has beaten the Commodore 64 in total sales" while combining the Pi A, Pi B, Pi A+, Pi B+, Pi Zero, Pi 2B, Pi 3B, and all the other Pi variations into the entire brand name "Raspberry Pi" is complete and utter bullshit. To claim that the Pi is a general-purpose computer just because it has USB, ethernet, HDMI, and Wi-Fi is disingenuous at best because it can barely even execute a modern internet browser on some models, if it can run one at all, and once it's running it's unusably slow. Being able to spin up a copy of Firefox or Chromium isn't optional for a computer meant to be useful to the unwashed masses. It's intended to be an embedded device, plain and simple. My Pi B is sitting on a shelf next to me, unused because the only thing it's good for is Xbian, and even that struggles to perform acceptably.

      Before anyone says something: no, Midori does not count.

    8. Re:This is absurdly incorrect on its face by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The Linksys WRT54G has the same problem as the Raspberry Pi, in the sense that different revisions run very different hardware and not all revisions are compatible with each other. Which of course is confusing as hell since Linksys links to reuse the same model number over and over for some reason.

      Though I would argue that the Pi is a general purpose computer. Sure, many of them end up embedded in some application, but I've seen the same thing done to standard off-the-shelf desktop machines running the regular desktop version of Windows.

  23. Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The C64 is still the best-selling model of computer of all time. The fact, (assuming that it is even true,) that more individual Raspberry Pi's have been sold in absolute numbers ignores the fact that there are MORE PEOPLE buying computers, and few people are using the RP as anything more than a toy, or for hobby purposes, while the C64 was sold as a REAL general purpose computer. The Pi simply occupies a specialized niche, and only sells as well as it does because it's so cheap that it's a trivial purchase for most people who own one. Undoubtably, many people who own one RP actually own several, because again, they're trivial purchases for most owners. A C64 was hundreds of dollars, JUST FOR THE COMPUTER, to say nothing of the cost of needed peripherals, without which it's not a useable computer. You'd need, as a minimum, a Datasette or a 1541 or 1571 Floppy Disc Drive, and maybe a modem, plus other things like software, etc. While an RP might score over the C64 in that respect, it does highlight the point that a computer user in the 1980s who wanted to buy a fully functioning, general purpose computer and chose a C64, and owned no computer or parts before, would need the computer itself, a floppy disk drive, software, a monitor, a printer, and maybe a joystick or two... plus maybe a MODEM, (there was less to do with one in those days,) a users or programming guide, if one wanted to edit or create software, disks, something to put the disks in... it was a lot more than 35 bucks, and don't forget that the roughly thousand or so bucks you'd have to drop on all that stuff, was worth WAY more than the equivalent number today.

    Further, if they haven't adjusted for the changes in both the entire total population of the planet Earth, of humans, and the changes in the size of the total market who might be able to buy a computer, then again, they're comparing apples and oranges. It would be like bragging about your new model of car outselling the Model T Ford. Whoopity fucking doo. Congratulations, Pi guys... your toy outsold a computer that was instrumental in the popularization of the general purpose home computer. Sleep well tonight.

    1. Re: Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1571 is only worth it when you own a 128.

  24. Re: No comparison to the C64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    agreed price the c64 at that price and any one with even the slightest interest would have got one. there is today considerably more interest in computers and tech as well tinkering today as well.

  25. Apples and Oranges. by westlake · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Raspberry Pi is a circuit board for hobbyists --- one component of the kit of parts you'll need for various projects. The C-64 and its cassette or disk drive a home PC designed for mass market sale. No assembly required.

    1. Re:Apples and Oranges. by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      You really just need a keyboard and mouse. At that point it's a functional PC with programming languages, and several utilities. Much more than the C64 had.

    2. Re:Apples and Oranges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Raspberry Pi is a circuit board for hobbyists --- one component of the kit of parts you'll need for various projects. The C-64 and its cassette or disk drive a home PC designed for mass market sale. No assembly required.

      It goes further then that. The C64 was early 80s tech and for those in the know that was when "computer stuff" was a black art. People didn't even know what it was. Hell it wasn't even nerdy (in the unpopular sense unlike the way self-described hipsters use it today) back then, it was nothing, not even on the map. Computers didn't get wildly uncool until around (I would say) the 386-486 era when most homes started to get one. But I digress...

      Point is to sell 12M of these in the early 80s-90s is a feat unto itself. This isn't the NES, this isn't the first iphone or walkman, this was a legit computer. And if you compare the number of "nerds" then to the "faux-trendy-nerds" nerds of today, that is simply amazing.

    3. Re:Apples and Oranges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      keyboard, mouse, (micro) sd card, display, usb charger,
      if it's a zero you probably need an usb hub, a micro-hdmi to hdmi converter, a wireless or wired ethernet adaptor (unless it's the W)

    4. Re:Apples and Oranges. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The C64 had no display. Didn't have a mouse either, and the Pi doesn't actually need one to be usable. Nor did it have ethernet or USB.

  26. Similarities by dohzer · · Score: 1

    C64/RPi Similarities:
    1. Both are computers.
    2. Both are currently gathering dust in people's cupboards.

    1. Re: Similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was using my c64 less than 3 hours ago. My pi is definitely gathering dust, though.

    2. Re: Similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sys 64738
      load "$",8
      list

    3. Re: Similarities by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      Try my sig out on a C64. It'll crash BASIC V2 !

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    4. Re:Similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two RPis that are both currently running kodi hanging behind my tv with a $2 remote sensor attached. Works perfectly well (rpi2+3) playing and streaming 1080p content. Eats little power, no noise and cheap. Used probably every day.

      Problem is people just bought it to play with it. And they did. The end. I bought it for the sole reason to stream stuffs. And it does.

  27. OH my apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My apple v commodore feelings came back. Oh to reminisce. We are old....

  28. Not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Commodore 64 sold for all those years and millions of units with the same processor, ui and Os.

    Each time you change an OS, UI, or processor, you're really making a different computer.

  29. Re: No comparison to the C64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, but why would you?

  30. Commodore is a better value... by RyanRife8866 · · Score: 0

    ...it comes with a power supply and keyboard and can connect to old televisions, try that with Raspberry Pi.

  31. Disengenuous Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a bit like saying that some movie released this year has broken all previous box-office records. Of course it breaks all those records: tickets cost more than they did 10 years ago.

    In this case, the population of the world has increased quite a bit since the release of the C64. Also, computing isn't just a hobby for some minuscule fraction of nerds with money. Computing is huge these days with many more people in the market for hobby-style tech. Finally, the Pi is orders of magnitude less expensive than the C64 was.

    All of these things make a simple units-sold comparison useless. A better comparison might be dollars-spent or fraction-of-market-reached. It would be hard to estimate the size of the hobby-programmer market both now and then, I suppose.

    Also, where would the Pi be without the C64 having existed in the past? The C64 created the hobby-programmer, the Pi is just taking advantage of the existing market of those same people.

  32. Hype news for the rpi fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, rpi fanboys in full swing today.

    C64 was... In the 1980's. Computers weren't in the mainstream yet. That says a lot how monumental the C64 was. Rpi is basically cheap phone tech and there's what? Few billion phones out there nowadays. Computing is affordable and mainstream. Progress.

    And considering you have a 4yr old BBB or odroid that [still] costs $25 more than a rpzero and still out performs it in general uses shouts hype news.

    1. Re:Hype news for the rpi fanboys by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Funny, I got the impression it was C64 fanboys in full swing.

  33. Re: No comparison to the C64 by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    You can get an old 8052 processor if you want to build something similar, but if you want something in a small surface mount package the cheapest is actually going to be a 32 bit ARM, with a few 8 bit AVR and PIC micros close behind. But expect to pay over a dollar if you want 64K RAM, not a few cents.

  34. Re: No comparison to the C64 by amiga3D · · Score: 2

    I bought my first C64 in 1984 for $199 with the C1541 5.25" floppy disk drive for another $199 at the BX on Keesler AFB. I still have them and they still work. I just hooked it up to a TV the other day to look for some text files I had on a disk. My 1084 monitor died unfortunately and finding one in my area has been impossible. I've also got 16 Raspberry Pi boards. 2 original B, 2 of the B2 boards, 4 A+ boards, 4 Rpi B3 boards, 2 pi zero boards and now 2 pi zeroW boards. I've got about half of them in use at the moment with 6 running cameras on a surveillance system. 1 with libreelec media center on it and 1 with retropie for games. I also have one that I have set up as a desktop and I sometimes use it just to fool around. That's the thing about the Pi. It's got so much it can do but they're so cheap you tend to just collect them. They use next to no power so if you want to run a torrent 24/7 it's almost free as far as electrical power so why tie up your big quad core Intel beast for something trivial? If you fry one experimenting ( I use the old first generation ones for that) it's not a big deal. Once I build a box to connect my 1541 I'm going to pull all the data off my old 5.25 floppies before I can't. I'm kind of shocked that I haven't lost any as far as I can tell, it's over 30 years now.

  35. Re: No comparison to the C64 by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    They're building a very nice FPGA accelerator for the Commodore Amiga system. Basically building a very fast version of a Motorola 68060 for less than the price of an old Motorola chip if you could even find one. It also does a lot of very neat things to speed up all phases of the Amiga. I never would have believed such a thing was possible 20 years ago.
    http://www.apollo-accelerators...

  36. ZoomFloppy for USB C64 floppy drive by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://store.go4retro.com/zoom...

    I bought one of those, but I'm having trouble getting a disk drive so I can pull data off old diskettes while I still can... Lucky you to still have one that works!

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  37. Re:ZoomFloppy for USB C64 floppy drive by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I've got 3. And a C1581 3.5" drive for it as well. I need to ebay this stuff. I don't need 3 C64 systems. I would like a nice 1084S though.

  38. Re: No comparison to the C64 by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    I have got an Atari style joystick which has a TV out and contains an entire Commodore 64 and several games for it.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  39. Re: No comparison to the C64 by pagebt · · Score: 1

    I just pulled mine out and shared it with my son who is learning the whole retro gaming scene. Challenged him to take it apart and add keyboard and storage with instructions on the internet.