Slashdot Mirror


Feds: We're Pulling Data From 100 Phones Seized During Trump Inauguration (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: In new filings, prosecutors told a court in Washington, DC that within the coming weeks, they expect to extract all data from the seized cellphones of more than 100 allegedly violent protesters arrested during the inauguration of President Donald Trump. Prosecutors also said that this search is validated by recently issued warrants. The court filing, which was first reported Wednesday by BuzzFeed News, states that approximately half of the protestors prosecuted with rioting or inciting a riot had their phones taken by authorities. Prosecutors hope to uncover any evidence relevant to the case. Under normal judicial procedures, the feds have vowed to share such data with defense attorneys and to delete all irrelevant data. "All of the Rioter Cell Phones were locked, which requires more time-sensitive efforts to try to obtain the data," Jennifer Kerkhoff, an assistant United States attorney, wrote. Such phone extraction is common by law enforcement nationwide using hardware and software created by Cellebrite and other similar firms. Pulling data off phones is likely more difficult under fully updated iPhones and Android devices.

5 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Re:That's what happened at Hitler's inauguration by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anne Frank's diary was written long after the end of WWII, using a ballpoint pen (which wasn't invented until after WWII)

    That is holocaust denialist BS that has been debunked:

    Anne wrote the body of her diary with a fountain pen. The only things written in ballpoint pen ink are two loose notes written by someone else and put with the papers later and some page numbers written on the sheets during the compilation process.

    There is a long history of neo-Nazis trying to discredit Anne's diaries, so in 1963 her defenders tracked down the arresting officer that led the raid on their hideout. He corroborated nearly everything that Anne's father had said.

  2. Re:That's what happened at Hitler's inauguration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Godwin rule waved when SJWs show up and start denouncing everyone they politically disagree as {agreed-upon boogey man of the times}.

    Because, yeah, that IS what Nazis did

  3. Re:That's what happened at Hitler's inauguration by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    So the original claim that she was not only at his Innauguration, but also had her diary with her, is at least two kinds of bullshit itself.

    Except that nobody claimed that. The famous diary writer at Hitler's inauguration was Joseph Goebbels. His diary is fascinating to read, and provides a huge amount of insight into the inner workings of Nazi Germany, unlike Anne's which is just the musing of a girl locked in a room.

  4. Re:That's what happened at Hitler's inauguration by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    Neo-Nazi B.S. de-bunked by an actual ex-Nazi!

    Actually, most Neo-Nazi BS is best debunked by actual Nazis. "The Holocaust never happened" is thoroughly debunked by Nazi testimony at Nuremberg. The defenses fell in one of two categories:

    1. Yes, I killed people, but I was just following orders, so I am not responsible.
    2. Yes, I gave orders, but I didn't actually kill anyone myself, so I am not responsible.

    But NONE of them use the defense, or ever claimed, that the killings didn't happen, or that the death camps didn't exist. No one claimed that until many years later.

  5. Re:So, the gist of it is... by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Informative

    The leading Birther was Hillary, during the 2008 primary. But don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'