Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Launches New 24/7 Workplace Surveillance Service (philly.com)

America's largest ISP just rolled out a new service that allows small and medium-sized business owners "to oversee their organization" with continuous video surveillance footage that's stored in the cloud -- allowing them to "improve efficiency." An anonymous reader quotes the Philadelphia Inquirer: Inventory is disappearing. Workplace productivity is off. He said/she said office politics are driving people crazy. Who you gonna call...? Comcast Business hopes it will be the one, with the "SmartOffice" surveillance offering formally launched this week in Philadelphia and across "70 percent of our national [internet] service footprint," said Christian Nascimento, executive director of premise services for the Comcast division. Putting a "Smart Cities" (rather than "Big Brother is watching you") spin on "the growing trend for...connected devices across the private and public sectors," the SmartOffice solution "can provide video surveillance to organizations that want to monitor their locations more closely," Nascimento said...
The surveillance cameras are equipped with zoom lenses, night-vision, motion detection, and wide-angle lenses, while an app allows remote access to the footage from smartphones and tablets (though the footage can also be downloaded, or stored online for up to a month). Last year Comcast was heavily involved in an effort to provide Detroit's police department with real-time video feeds from over 120 local businesses, which the mayor said wouldn't have been successful "Without the complete video technology system Comcast provides."

152 comments

  1. We need communism now! by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 0

    The workers must rule.
    Follow Lenin and Trotsky!

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
    1. Re:We need communism now! by sabri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The workers must rule.

      Right, that worked very well in Eastern Europe.

      We need stronger privacy laws, nothing else. Keep your communism in the USSR please.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    2. Re:We need communism now! by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Democracy, the workers are the majority, the workers must rule. A government of the workers, by the workers and for the workers. I might not agree with everything real democracy produces but I do accept it because I do truly value the worth of Democracy. The workers must rule they are the majority, suck it up! My religion, Freedom, Democracy and Justice, more than just an empty belief or motto. Nobody expects the global democratic reformation https://www.youtube.com/watch?... that's what it will feel like for the rich and greedy and for the rest of us, the majority, it will be justice and rather humorous to boot.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:We need communism now! by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd think the last 100 years of this dogmatic nonsense would've taught everyone a lesson by now. Communist states typically provided the worst environments with the least incentives for workers.

    4. Re:We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16 years in the future and on the other side of world?

    5. Re:We need communism now! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right, that worked very well in Eastern Europe.

      Invalid analogy, the worked NEVER actually ruled in any Communist / Socialist Eastern Block country.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is we have so many who don't want to work, and they won't work as long as we continue to support them.

      You must be a member of one of the older generations.

      We do work. We work our asses off, and in many cases in more than one job or while trying to get an education. We don't get paid much because that would cut into the companies profits, but how much we get paid is not a a good measurement of labor put in. It hasn't been for years, not since company execs decided that paying a living wage to their employees was wasting their money.

      The system you advocate just makes it worse. Now, if everybody was willing to work and do their part, it might have a chance of working.

      I take it "do their part" is defined as "work backbreaking labor, for less than it costs to pay the cheapest foreign worker to do the job" right? That's the problem. We can't work for those wages like that and keep a roof over our heads. Company execs, wall street, and government idiots, all like to think that their wage cuts, off-shoring, use of H1B visas, company mergers, and layoffs occur in a small insignificant bubble that won't have any consequences on the economy, or that others won't do the same thing to their employees. In reality however, the effect snowballs and the result is less decent paying jobs for American workers, less spending money on the average American consumer (that's bad in a services economy btw), a greater risk of Americans not being able to pay their bills, higher inflation, and less overall opportunity for Americans.

      Even with healthy work ethics, paying a person to do a job less than than the amount it takes to pay their monthly bills is not sustainable. Anyone with a healthy work ethic can tell you that, the problem is that's the only option a lot of people have.

      I still doubt it, though.

      So in other words, you're someone who thinks that unless everyone else does what you tell them to do, they are unworthy of a job. Taken to the extreme, that means we can't be paid enough to pay our bills because you deem it so. ("Well I demanded they work for 9 hours for minimum wage, or face unemployment. Why would I pay them enough to pay their bills when that money can buy me another set of golf clubs instead?") That's the problem, you can't be satisfied regardless of what anyone else does.

      And before you get too excited about democracy, remember that you may not like what the majority decides.

      That works both ways buddy. I'd think the majority would decide (eventually) to put limits on just how little you can pay them relative to the cost of living, or outright subsidize that cost.

      That's the problem with Capitalism and Globalization. Companies can outsource their labor to the cheapest worker they can find, but the laborers can't outsource their minimal cost of living. If you don't tie the minimum wage to the cost of living adjusted for inflation, and put meaningful limits on the amount of outsourcing a company can do while participating in your economy, the result in a Capitalist society is: The value of the people's labor drops too low to keep them or their communities going, they wind up not being able to work enough to make up for the difference, and their economy slows to a crawl before collapsing under it's own weight due to the amount of debt piling up.

      Given the options, you shouldn't expect that society will go along with it's own destruction for long.

    7. Re:We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just stumbled upon the reason Communism doesn't work.

      Congratulations!

    8. Re: We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake news.

      The workers never ruled in Eastern Europe. Other people just lobbied their way to the top.

      Nothing wrong with solidarity, and no political system will work unchecked.

    9. Re:We need communism now! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Right, that worked very well in Eastern Europe.

      How would you know, considering that they have actually never ruled there yet?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:We need communism now! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's hardly a "no true Scotsman" case. A claim was made that workers once ruled Eastern Europe and that it didn't work out. That simple fact is that the former never happened, rendering the latter nonsensical. No Scotsmen were mentioned.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer to exhort: The rulers must work! That seems to be more acute issue in today's world.

    12. Re:We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So stop VOTING for them then. If they're not in office, they'll either starve or have to get themselves a job.

      As long as we keep putting those lazy do-nothings in charge of our country, they'll keep just pocketing everything while cutting services again.

    13. Re:We need communism now! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Great! You have a couple thousand jobs that you didn't tell anyone about, please tell the people! If you think that everyone who wants a job can get one, I'm pretty sure you can point us to them!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:We need communism now! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I found a thing better than starving.

      BANG

      You're dead now and don't need your wallet anymore. Hey, if the alternative is starving to death, I take my chance killing you and only MAYBE get killed for that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:We need communism now! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The communist model didn't work for the same reason this one is failing: People want money. Not a job. The job is the necessary evil for money.

      The communist model failed because people noticed that they could get money without working.

      This one is failing because people are noticing that even if they were working they cannot get enough money.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work at a riverboat casino. There was video surveillance of all areas except the bathrooms and the break room. In addition, security could (but rarely did and only with cause) search purses, lunch boxes, backpacks etc... I had no problem with it. Where I would have a problem with workplace surveillance of employees is if the employees in question don't know they are being watched.

      Many retail stores now have video surveillance to help prevent theft. Whether the thief is an employee or not makes no difference. Employees knowing that they might be watched at any time would tend to inhibit improper behaviours in the workplace.

      I also have a problem with anyone wanting to track me in real life or on the internet, with "red light cameras", and being spied upon in my own home or on my own private property. The difference? At work you are paid to be there and put up with being watched.

    17. Re:We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we have people like you who does superficial work, but not important work that will impact mankind in any meaningful way.

    18. Re: We need communism now! by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      You think communism failed because everybody loved a life of ease without working? Uh, the "communist" (as in Soviet ) model failed because nobody could get material wealth no matter how hard they worked, and so material wealth was reserved as a reward for the Soviet 1%, who did nothing useful other than keep the 99% powerless. Sounds strangely familiar... Russia was a poor country by Western standards and productivity was low. Marx observed that societies meeting that description went into a capitalist phase where productivity and wealth increased vastly, but then fell apart because division of the wealth was to unfair. "Communism" thought they could skip that intermediate step. It never got to any stage where great masses of loafers loved off welfare, despite your odd fantasy.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    19. Re: We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, employment in the US means selling your basic human rights and dignity to a degree you would not otherwise, and maybe your labour also if the surveillance is effective enough.

    20. Re: We need communism now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you understand that "money" has no value I itself, right?

    21. Re: We need communism now! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The idea was to oversimplify the problem to get the 5 second attention span millennials to actually listen for a change...

      The problem of the communist model wasn't wellfare. It was basically what you said: No matter how hard you worked, it didn't matter. So people didn't. They took the GDR party slogan "We have to squeeze everything from our factories" to the heart and did exactly that. The consideration for the average worker was no longer how to produce more but how to get more out of it for himself. Since that wasn't possible by working more, and working less was not really punished either, people simply put up some work spectacle. Twice so when they noticed that due to the usual shortages working quickly when raw materials arrived meant not having to work at all at the end of the month when there were no raw materials left to work with.

      That was, by the way, similar when the East Bloc fell and the workers were taken over by West companies. The companies were delighted to see their new workforce work with incredible zeal, which plummeted instantly once they noticed that burning through the raw materials by the 5th didn't mean slacking for the rest of the month but instead getting a new stack of raw material...

      So don't worry. I know both systems. Quite intimately.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re: We need communism now! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but oddly there's a lot of people who want to give me everything and their soul for those oddly colored rectangular pieces of paper. And as long as they do, it has a value.

      Money is a commodity like any other. Its value is not what you attribute to it but what someone else is willing to give you for it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:We need communism now! by LienRag · · Score: 1

      They did in some part of Russia before the Civil War got too horrendous...

  2. German approach by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Personally I like the German approach better. No logging. None. We have swipe cards to enter the building for security reasons, when it was found that the timestamps of those cards were logged there was a huge stink about it even though as best anyone could tell no one actually ever accessed the logs. Employers are simply not allowed to monitor employees.

    Now that can go too far as well since that inhibits our ability to improve processes and makes incident investigation very difficult, but it's a shitload better than what is being proposed here.

    1. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better why? When you are in a company building, you should expect to be watched. As long as they aren't watching you in the bathroom, I don't understand what the problem is.

      You want to do something sneaky or not related to work? Go do it at home or in your car.

    2. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      >When you are in a company building, you should expect to be watched.

      No. It's illegal.

      >I don't understand what the problem is.

      It's illegal. Also unethical.

    3. Re:German approach by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      I'll take the German approach over anything else the EwwSA has to offer.

    4. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it simply is not illegal. there are generally cameras in all business offices

    5. Re:German approach by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Your employer hires thieves? What morons. Maybe they should spend the money to hire good people.

    6. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your employer hires thieves? What morons. Maybe they should spend the money to hire good people.

      If the janitor steals a pair of rubber gloves and uses them at home, you fire him and make sure the new janitor has his wage reset to base pay.

      If a company executive uses the corporate credit card for hookers and blow, you give him a bonus for creative use of company resources.

    7. Re:German approach by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      When you are in a company building, you should expect to be watched.

      ^^^ Ladies and gentlemen the sad reality of modern America. People exist who actually think like this.

    8. Re:German approach by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      So, when someone steals something, you just shrug your shoulders and move on cause there's no accountability at all?

      Funny you should mention that, we've caught thieves plenty of times doing bag inspections on the way out. My girfriend caught thieves by just remembering who was working with her the day the till didn't add up when counted after hours.

      There are plenty of ways to catch people doing the wrong thing that doesn't involve strapping a camera in their face and recording their every single move.

    9. Re:German approach by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Indeed, this would be illegal in the EU in general due to the European Charter on Human Rights and EU data protection laws.

      It's interesting how the EU and the US treat freedom differently. The US has extreme negative* freedom, that is the government doesn't interfere to either restrict or protect. The EU has more of a mixture of positive and negative freedom, where some interference is accepted as necessary to protect human rights and allow people to live some kind of meaningful life. Both options have merits.

      * Note to idiots: "negative" in this context does not mean "bad", just like negative numbers are not "bad".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is illegal. If there are cameras in an office, they may not be used while employees are there.

    11. Re:German approach by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      Why should your employer not watch you in the bathroom though? They pay for the bathrooms, and the toilet paper you use, and for cleaners to clean up after you. And they are paying you to do work, while you are having a shit. You don't have anything to hide do you? Who are you to decide where the arbitrary boundary between work and privacy should be? I like where Germany has set that boundary. It shows a level of trust. If you can't trust your workers, then you have deeper problems. People who are treated like animals will behave like animals. But people whose basic needs are met, who feel like they are paid well enough, who are treated with dignity and respect, who find meaning in their work and relationships, generally they don't feel the need to go around stealing company property or slaking off.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    12. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >it simply is not illegal. there are generally cameras in all business offices

      This is not the case anywhere I've ever worked (which doesn't include the USA, thank god).

      If they tried, they'd be in front of a court very fast - and those don't kid around, the court would shut them down if the company didn't take them down again.

    13. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And thats why Europe sucks.

      Our UK office blew a big stink about getting a security camera installed at the main entrance because the office had been broken into and dozens of laptops stolen. They refused, and the office got knocked over again a few months later, well its their budget so meh, they can explain that to the finance people in the US as to why they are wasting money and risk having their little operation's management taken apart and put back together again with people that will follow instructions.

    14. Re:German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, this would be illegal in the EU in general due to the European Charter on Human Rights and EU data protection laws.

      It's interesting how the EU and the US treat freedom differently. The US has extreme negative* freedom, that is the government doesn't interfere to either restrict or protect. The EU has more of a mixture of positive and negative freedom, where some interference is accepted as necessary to protect human rights and allow people to live some kind of meaningful life. Both options have merits.

      * Note to idiots: "negative" in this context does not mean "bad", just like negative numbers are not "bad".

      Truthfully, I don't think negative freedom was a bad system in the USA, but, in practice, it's basically dead. The system wasn't the problem, the problem is that the system is just a facade now. In practice, we don't have much freedom left.

    15. Re: German approach by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      In the US? No it's not. This is the internet, if you don't mean the US you have to specify...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    16. Re:German approach by drolli · · Score: 1

      It depends a little on the company - but the (existing) logs from the door systems have to be very well protected. But these systems typically will mainly log if you exceed your working time on some day, and you total hours.

    17. Re:German approach by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Everywhere I've worked in the chicago area the cleaning people are small business contract workers, they bring their own gloves. They don't steal because it's a family/friend business, they don't dare ruin things for the family.

    18. Re: German approach by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      An old (pre-perestroika) witticism: In the US, everything is permitted, except what is prohibited by law. In the Soviet Union, everything is prohibited, except what is permitted by law. In France, everything is permitted, including what is prohibited by law. And in China, everything is prohibited, including what is permitted by law.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    19. Re: German approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching everybody except in the bathroom reminds me of the old pre NSA US surprise drug searches they would pull in the airports on suspicious looking travelers like me, which involved looking though all your clothes and linings and under your clothes, but not in your underwear, because that would be weird.

    20. Re:German approach by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      germans ARE allowed to monitor.

      csb time: I used to work at cisco in the US and a friend who worked at cisco in .de told me that they disclose to their german employees the kinds of wiretapping they do (mgmt) to their employees. mgmt can turn on the webcam and mic at any time, do screen captures, enable keylogging, lots of things. all cisco laptops from corp IT come baked-in with corp spyware. not to worry, ALL big corps do this, now, and they bake-in fake certs so that you authenticate with the corp firewall even when you get a 'lock icon' on your ssl browser.

      the only diff is: the US managers are not allowed to say all this and the german mgrs have to disclose it. the only way I, a US employee, knew about this is that I was friends with someone who did get told this, who lives in .de.

      they most certainly log and do bad things; just like the US does. but their people, at least, are TOLD about this.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    21. Re:German approach by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      germans ARE allowed to monitor.

      Germans are allowed providing all employees agree to it.
      In the USA companies can do whatever the hell they want.

      There's a difference.

  3. minimum wage jobs by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    also have maximum security...or at least the max affordable

    1. Re:minimum wage jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of them are being replaced by *literally* "Maximum Security"...
      Because that way the taxpayers handle the overhead, and the company reaps all of the profits.

    2. Re:minimum wage jobs by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1, Redundant

      If they're going for that level of surveillance, why don't they just use paid or coerced informants like the Gestapo, KGB, and Stasi used? It'd be much cheaper and less effort to run.

    3. Re:minimum wage jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


      also have maximum security...or at least the max affordable

      Not exactly. The command and control mentality with corporate America is quite common. I used to work for a Fortune 100 company. Hell, I'll tell you the name. World Fuel Services. More accurately, I worked for a company that was bought by them. I eventually left of my own accord because the place had grown so toxic because of corporate, but that's another story.

      After being acquired, eventually the corporate facilities guy got around to us, and insisted they install security cameras everywhere. I assure you this company was NOT minimum wage employees. This was a medium size office of under 100 people where everyone knew each other and trusted each other. We never had a theft problem ever, and the building wasn't publicly accessible. Yet the facilities guy insisted we had to have security cameras that all reported back to corporate. Nobody was happy about it, our upper management tried to fight it, but it didn't matter. The cameras went in.

      So it's not just minimum wage employees that have to put up with this surveillance crap. Corporate America is still quite in love with this idea that they can control everything, and that's a good thing. Sadly, that idea isn't going to die anytime soon, and is likely expanding, not contracting.

    4. Re:minimum wage jobs by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Just walk into any healthcare facility in the US. Panopticon ain't in it. We've got cameras monitoring cameras and locks protecting locked drawers.

      In college I worked for a large aviation company as a summer intern in a high security facility. It was more relaxed than the little hospital I work in presently. I just wish they would let us review the feeds so I could figure out where I left my glasses.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re: minimum wage jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach, brother. My former employer, a household name Fortune 500 white collar firm where virtual teams were the rule (everybody I worked with was in another state) made a lot of noise about encouraging work-at-home (while demanding 60 hour workweeks). At one point our director spoke to my department about "the rumour that our security badge logs in and out are being used to track our hours". Oh no, rather they are being used on an aggregate level to determine requirements for office space, since nobody wants to pay for space and utilities that are not utilized; the company would never be so petty as to track our logs in and out individually.

      Two weeks later I was written up for not spending enough time in the office, on the grounds of.... the in and out times the parking garage logged, for billing purposes.

  4. Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drag them onto the street

    And keep dragging until there's *nothing left*.

    This is completely unacceptable, unethical, immoral, and it cannot be allowed to spread.

    1. Re:Take whoever came up with this by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is completely unacceptable, unethical, immoral, and it cannot be allowed to spread.

      What more would you expect from Comcast?

    2. Re:Take whoever came up with this by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's an idea for you:

      1) Start a retail business.

      2) Get robbed by someone who walks in the front door. Or,

      3) Have one of your employees attack another one. Or,

      4) Have one of your employees get hooked on heroin and start to steal your inventory.

      I'm guessing your solution to getting to the bottom of such things is to hire people to stand around watching everything so they can testify based on their recollections of events later, in a trial. Because you sure wouldn't want what happens on your own property with your own inventory with your the people you pay money to be there doing things to be recorded. Until you really, really do because real life is different when you start paying a fortune in insurance as part of running a business. Or find yourself in court. Or are running out of money because of inventory shrinkage, or have to know which of your very good employees is totally innocent of what one of your rotten employees has been setting them up to look guilty for.

      But yeah, I can see why you'd advocate violence against a vendor offering a service you can choose to ignore if it's not useful to you.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand the GP's position as well as the position of the employer who simply wants higher productivity and accountability from employees but I have to ask myself just how hard could it be to find a drug addict who'd be willing to break in and burn the whole place down for you?

    4. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Give them a decent paycheck so they actually have something to lose if they get fired?

    5. Re:Take whoever came up with this by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Bad customer support?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you run a business without an insurance?
      What are you? One of those idiots who thinks that statistics don't apply to them?

      For everything else... That's the cops and judges are for. Let them do the job you're paying them for.
      Or are you likewise one of those idiots who thinks that taxes also only happen to other people?

    7. Re:Take whoever came up with this by sgage · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, why are steps 2, 3, and 4 even a thing? We don't have a society, we don't have a culture of honesty and dignity, and no amount of techno-crap will ever make up for that. And if you think that this 'product' is a 'solution' to some sort of 'problem', well, your head is somewhere awkward.

    8. Re:Take whoever came up with this by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Why would you run a business without an insurance?

      Who suggested that? But why would pay far more for your insurance than you need to? You can hugely mitigate those costs by having a decent security system. Which you know, but are pretending you don't.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:Take whoever came up with this by ScentCone · · Score: 0

      Ah, spoken like a person who has indeed never seen a new hire in their first week pocketing merchandise or participating in a phony return/credit scam. Grow up.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 2

      Yep, you've never actually worked in such an environment, have you? I've seen people making six figures who steal routinely $20 stuff from their employers. I've seen well paid general managers of grocery stores stealing steaks. I've seen IT directors who drive Teslas but who still pocket RAM sticks from the lab. You'll understand when you start working.

      Those same people will tell you they didn't steal anything because they were "perqs" of the job. But let their underlings take a half pencil home and they go berserk. They are the Elites so they have the RIGHT to their perqs. The Peons who work for them have no rights in their eyes.

    11. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, not the person who originally posted, but someone coming from 20+ years in the US workforce across a half dozen industries.

      If someone making six figures steals a $20 widget every week, you're losing $1000/year, or about 1% of your personnel cost. If it costs you more than $1000/year to fix that, it's a bad idea to fix, as long as it's not getting worse.

      You'd have to buy or build a way to catch them, build the process to reprimand and then fire them, hire additional HR personnel to run the whole thing, and you're occasionally firing or demoralizing some of your better employees. If you lose three months of productivity while you're looking for a replacement, that's $25k of productivity gone, $5k+ spent on recruiters to find new people, losing a few dozen hours of the rest of your staff to interview candidates, and then 3-6 months of full pay before they're fully useful ($25-50k)...

      The cost to an organization of firing a $100k employee is between $50-150k. If they steal $20/week for fifty years, it's still cheaper to just ignore, at the very least. What they're doing is unethical, but kind of a cost of doing (efficient) business.

    12. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Replying to my own thread on this one; if you find an employee stealing the *same* $20 item every week? Hell, turn it into a free perk.

      Employees who think their employers give a damn do at least twice the work in the same amount of time. If you're going to spend the money (and you probably should anyways), get them to work harder for it.

    13. Re:Take whoever came up with this by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't need a drug addict.

      You just need a guy with a red stapler.

      --
      BMO

    14. Re: Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm guessing your solution to getting to the bottom of such things is to hire people to stand around watching everything so they can testify based on their recollections of events later, in a trial. "

      They like to use such excuses about workplace safety and inventory control to justify putting the cameras in, but it's usually bullshit.

      What you'll quickly learn is how they'll use those systems to record their employees doing something they can be fired for.

      You're on the phone too much. Maybe you came in late a couple of minutes. Whatever.

      If they have eyes on you 24/7 it won't take long for them to find something to fire you with.

    15. Re:Take whoever came up with this by ScentCone · · Score: 0

      Well, you're just wrong. I've personally watched inventory shrinkage drop into the measurement noise with the introduction of technology-based tools that catch the people who steal - because other employees understand there are consequences.

      Yes, it's a shame that throughout all of human history and in every level of society and income, some people like to steal stuff. Someone who is trying to make a living running a business and who has to make payroll every week and keep customers happy won't usually have a lot of luck changing human nature. Now, I know that you've personally solved these human nature problems in your own area, and no longer feel any need to lock your doors or in any way look after your personal safety, because you've fixed everybody that you might encounter or who might want your stuff.

      Yes, people stealing things IS a problem. And taking measures to stop it from happening to you isn't irrational. Yes, more parents should raise kids that have some sort of moral compass and which are educated and motivated enough to go out and create things so that they can trade the fruit of their labors for the stuff they want, instead of stealing it. Your notion that it's wrong-headed to use convenient tools to help deal with the fact that there are lots of people out there who DO find it easier (or even, in some cases, more entertaining) to steal stuff than buy it - never mind, I realize that you're trolling. Silly me.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    16. Re:Take whoever came up with this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I've seen IT directors who drive Teslas but who still pocket RAM sticks from the lab.

      The problem is, there is zero probability that this new corporate surveillance will be aimed at IT directors.

      Because if there's one thing we've learned, it's that if you are rich and you steal, it's considered, "smart". If you're making $35k/yr and you make an unauthorized copy of your tax return on a company xerox machine, you're going to get frog-marched out of the place.

      Late-stage capitalism is a cancer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Snufu · · Score: 2

      Already the most hated company in America, is comcast trying to create some kind of hatred singularity?

    18. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're example is extreme.
      Everyone looks the other way over one copy, except maybe those god damn accountants.

    19. Re:Take whoever came up with this by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I can see why American businesses would want to monitor their employees for insurance purposes, not only to try and prevent slaking off. With all the ambulance chasers, sexual harassment lawsuit, firing related lawsuits, etc., makes sense. If the laws are such that the employer can be taken to court just to try and get money out of an employer, this service can provide some level of protection by presenting some type of evidence that may quickly prove many allegations to be lies.

    20. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did not a single thing against the skimming at the top, the six or seven figure embezzling, the no-bid-contracts to friends with little to no value, the golden parachutes as thanks for wrecking two quarters...

      It's a lot of money destroying people's privacy just so you can feel like the big man when Joe takes a damn stapler.

    21. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have. And you know why?
      Because there were no cameras in the manager's office, just 3 of them aimed at the cashier and two on the beer fridge.

      Brand new manager walked in and turned us from an A store to a C- on profit losses even though our sales had actually gone up.

      Two months later when corporate got involved, there were 3 high-rez color cameras aimed at the cash and the beer-fridge circuit was untouched. We cashiers could not be trusted with the deposits we never stole, because after we'd make the triple-checked and camera-verified deposit into that pneumatic tube the money would sometimes disappear which would be marked on our personal balance because we're thieves.

      The money kept disappearing well after I got fired for the thefts.

    22. Re: Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll not be surprised to hear the cameras magically often do not catch when you're involved in any sort of accident either! Somehow they weren't working when that inadequate guardrail gives way or the press roll snaps off directly at someone because maintenance downtime was 'spread out' to every 11 months from the 6 we're supposed to have for that machine to "improve repair efficiency".

      In fact, said coworker had to take them to court because they drove him to the hospital so as to avoid records of an ambulance (he couldn't do much about it being unconscious) and his shift changed so he got hurt at home.
      This is no exaggeration, my neighbor's been walking with a cane since then, and is *still* waiting on the court's decision to see if they're liable for his bills.

    23. Re: Take whoever came up with this by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Studies have shown that employees who are "allowed" to steal diddly items from their employer remain content at lower salaries than those where theft is tightly controlled, the difference in salary being far more than the value of the theft. Human nature being what it is. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/pay-...

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    24. Re: Take whoever came up with this by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      At last, the meaning of the word "xfinity" is revealed.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    25. Re:Take whoever came up with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always found it interesting that in the original cartoon, Milton (the stapler guy) was the star of that series.

    26. Re:Take whoever came up with this by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Not content to just fuck you at home, now they fuck you in your workplace as well!

      I just got a letter explaining that to service me better, they are increasing the fee they charge to re-broadcast the channels I can get for free over the air.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  5. New policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In addition to the new "Big Brother know best" observation system, the beatings will continue until morale improves.

  6. does the equipment have outlet / renting fees? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    does the equipment have outlet / renting fees? Knowing Comcast they may just do that + lock you into a 2-3 year deal as well.

  7. high definition is now only 720p at comcast! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    high definition is now only 720p at comcast! I can buy my own 1080P ones for under $100 each.

    1. Re:high definition is now only 720p at comcast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      720p is considered "high definition" when buying a video system. 1080i or 1080p is also "high definition". It's a marketing thing, not exclusive to Comcast, and refers to the difference from analog video. For comparing digital video, it's much more common to either use the 1080p (etc) description, or just say it in megapixels. 720p is roughly 1 MP (1440x720) 1080p is roughly 2 MP (1920x1080). The old analog standard maxes out at roughly 0.3 MP so "high definition" is relative to that.

      But yes, 1080p is cheap. The problem is having bandwidth that lets you send video to the cloud, which Comcast will happily upsell businesses. Not to mention your data usage caps for sending out multiple megapixel video streams 24/7.

  8. this really is one of the top evil companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they trying to win some kind of evil award of something?

    1. Re:this really is one of the top evil companies by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Are they trying to win some kind of evil award of something?

      Google got a lot of milage from "Don't Be Evil".

      Maybe Comcast is trying for a shorter, edgier theme in view of more apocalyptic flavor of recent events : Be Evil.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  9. As someone that works in a workplace too cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    to pay for lights, the nightvision sounds attractive to my employer. It sucks working Seattle Hundreds (16 hours a day Mon-Thur and 12 hours a day Fri-Sun) in a dim office.

  10. Re: As someone that works in a workplace too cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many employers in Seattle think we can live with dim offices since it isn't bright outside.

  11. And you will need to rent Comcast internet hardwar by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And you will need to rent Comcast internet hardware to make use of this. Yes if you want comcast business internet static ip you must rent there gateway on top of the static ip fee.

  12. Team Tables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At my company everyone (including former remote employees) just sit at team tables. We take all breaks (including bathroom breaks) together, and always go to lunch together. I really doubt we need such a service.

    1. Re:Team Tables by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      No, you need counseling.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Team Tables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck? Sounds like you work in a prison... ... as inmates

    3. Re:Team Tables by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      What the fuck? Sounds like you work in a prison... ... as inmates

      Or a special ed class... as students.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  13. Funny by transporter_ii · · Score: 2

    I work with a bunch of right wingers that flip out over stuff like this, but if the government contacted us about doing contract camera installs in people's bedrooms, they would be sitting around working on quotes and figuring up profit margins and commissions. I guess we all have our price.

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least you know which type of minds are the ones that WANT to install cameras everywhere in order to increase profit margins.

    2. Re:Funny by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      but if the government contacted us about doing contract camera installs in people's bedrooms

      Paranoia much?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  14. Hackers will have fun with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just think... Having video of all your trade secrets spilled out to some anonymous site including audio when the hack the camera to enable it.

    1. Re:Hackers will have fun with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China and Russia celebrate Comcast's push for complete transparency on behalf of numerous American businesses!

  15. curse to the self employed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have to monitor & punish ourselves? we choose harsher penalties for others for the same 'offense'.. cease fire stand down,, our imaginary secrets are not in jeopardy? most of the fear based overkill disinformation is drummed up on madison ave.? sing along.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-kA3UtBj4M

  16. Is this service network neutral? by Nkwe · · Score: 2

    Does the bandwidth used by uploading and downloading video count against any of your data caps or ratings? If not, would similar video streams from a competing service count?

  17. When Leadership fails, buy this product! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Leadership fails, buy this product!

  18. So this is what they're spending their money on by Jimbo+God+of+Unix · · Score: 1

    Too bad it isn't to upgrade the infrastructure for the cash cow of residential customers. It's to build out a system for a solution in search of a problem.

    The more you know.

  19. Re: As someone that works in a workplace too cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle is almost 300 miles farther north than Toronto. You are getting what you deserve.

  20. If you try to cancel the service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be put on hold for 45 minutes listening to Barry Manilow music, followed by a transfer to Comcast India where "Joe" will interview you, and, because you have been such a valuable customer, inform you that Comcast is willing to give you three months of employee lip-reading transcriptions on a complimentary basis.

    1. Re:If you try to cancel the service by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      I got asked if I wanted to transfer my service to a friend or family member... I'm not that evil and it hurts to think about how assholes might exist that would do this to somebody...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  21. So...giving up on passwords somehow? by mhkohne · · Score: 2

    I mean, if you've got full surveillance of the workplace, then a camera can be looking at you keyboard as you type the password.

    So what do you do instead of passwords? Biometrics? Some kind of plug-in token? Does Comcast get the business for your conversion of that too?

    Or are the employees supposed to hunch over and shield the keyboard with their bodies when typing in passwords?

    Who's taking bets on how long before some company is seriously compromised by this?

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  22. Who shall watch those selfsame watchers? by shanen · · Score: 2

    So now we have a level of people who spend all their time watching other people working (or faking it), but the obvious new job opportunity is to get a job watching the guys who are watching the other guys.

    It's the ultimate in job security, because they'll always need to hire someone at the next level up!

    Unbounded recursion? Resources exhausted? Whatever do you mean?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Who shall watch those selfsame watchers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lacking a security background eh? Two positions for security. Position A watches half of the staff including Position B. Position B watches the other half including Position A. Preferably the people in Position A and Position B dislike eachother. HR can make that happen.

      Get off the IDE and find some common sense.

  23. POS by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    They usually want point of sale integration too - so they can look at "no sale" cash drawer openings.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  24. What are the contracts like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope Comcast sneaks in using the video for commercial purposes.
    A whole lot of footage for new fail videos.

  25. Idea has been around forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 30 years ago, a former NSA employee told me that soon employers would have cameras pointed at all their workers and keystroke monitors in place to make sure the workers were not slacking off.

    I told him that if they did that to me, they would see me working and typing good clean code while I would spend every day on the beach.

    Nothing has changed. The more you depend on technology like this rather than just hiring good people to begin with, the more problems you will have.

  26. Sounds good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As long as I'm one of the elite classes that tells the others what to do.

  27. Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump sure managed to deliver on all of his Obamacare promises! His Presidency is proceeding as expected. He's a joke and his voters are the punchline. 2018 and 2020 don't bode well for the Teaturds.

  28. Are you a Libertarian troll or something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just seems like intentional flame bait to smear socialism altogether. Pick those known for leading the formation of the totalitarian Soviet Union as inspiration in your call for rebellion against workplace surveillance. How about we aim for something that doesn't replace one form of authoritarianism for another?

  29. Nicknamed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I.C.U.

  30. After all.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. they've been testing it for years with your smart TVs, laptops, webcams, and IP cameras.

  31. Flashback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo6cexQj7Yo&t=168s

  32. Hire me! I love hard work! by shanen · · Score: 2

    Hire me! Hire me!

    I love hard work!

    I could watch it all day!

    But seriously folks, I mostly enjoyed my work and didn't even want to retire when the big three-letter-company was done with me. Looking at the developing situation, now I think I got out just in time.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  33. Outstanding!!!! by thermowax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We can use this facility for police bodycams, right? You know, the ones that seem to consistently "lose" footage at convenient (critical) times?

  34. The real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... police department with real-time video feeds from over 120 local businesses

    So it's not about businesses using intrusive technology to enforce time and asset management. It's about police increasing surveillance and push-button policing while businesses socialize their time and asset management expenses.

  35. comcast 'security" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would worry about the authentication of the cameras and stored video. It looks like a way for creepers to watch people or worse if done poorly

  36. Does Comcast really want to be hated *more*? by sethstorm · · Score: 3

    This just reeks of micromanagement.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Does Comcast really want to be hated *more*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast doesn't actually know they're hated...

      Oh that was those other guys... we're XFINITY now! See totally different, so you can't hate us.

  37. No Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Period. And Comcast can go fuck themselves.

  38. Too late Comcast by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    Productivity is at an all-time high. This is one reason why people can't find jobs: work that used to take several people is now being done by one, and that one suffers in silence just glad to have a job. And they can see the line of applicants at the door.

    So what crack is Comcast smoking? Maybe their cameras can tell them where to get it.

    Here's the thing: any business desperately threatened without cameras A) already knows it, and B) almost certainly already has cameras in place. Cameras have been cheap for a while and easy to setup and monitor. Anyone who wants to go nuts putting in cameras can do so, and watch them from across the globe.

    The problem is, all the cameras you can install have not stopped shrinkage (employee theft) or really stopped other crimes, and there is scant evidence they have encouraged people to work harder. Everybody who wants to steal figures out ways to do it that the cameras can't see. And people who goof off or whatever will always goof off.

    And if you really DO install cameras and follow what Comcast suggests for doing live remote monitoring or storing footage online and so forth, exactly WHO is going to watch all of this amazing footage? In most offices or businesses, nobody has time to be a camera operator. And the regular managers already have jobs, managing, and when they go home, they don't want to sit there having to watch cameras.

    So Comcast is selling a solution for a problem that they cannot actually fix, and instead of improving productivity as they claim, it really means some sucker will have to endure watching hours of nothing trying desperately to find something exciting worthy of Youtube if not LiveLeak, and for 99%+ of of these cameras, they will see nothing at all.

    But hey Comcast can charge them big $$ for it. Every month. Promising something exciting will happen and Comcast will be there to help you see it!

    BULLSHIT

    --
    Sig for hire.
  39. Poor brand management by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    I'm a little surprised that they didn't form a new division and give it a different name for this product. I don't think that the "we surveil people for money" notion is going to help their cable internet business. Granted, much of that is in locations where they have a monopoly, but still. Now if municipalities want to fight with them they can say "regardless of whether they're spying on non-business customers, too many of our community members are convinced that they do - we have to provide a municipal alternative for their peace of mind."

  40. First customer! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    I know the perfect place to implement this service: The White House. I'm sure the American people would like to ensure that they are getting the highest levels of productivity there...

  41. Re: As someone that works in a workplace too cheap by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

    Seattle is a mere 46 deg N
    London is 51 deg N
    Edinburgh is 55.9 deg N (400 miles N of London)

    We don't have the 'Seattle disease' here. If anything, the offices are far too brightly lit.
    Don't complain about the high lattitude of US cities unless they are in Alaska.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
  42. FINALLY! by meglon · · Score: 1

    An absolutely huge benefit for sole proprietorships with no employees. Now i'll be able to find where the hell i put my car keys MUCH easier.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  43. Re: As someone that works in a workplace too cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be a dick. You ought to know as an adult with access to a worldwide internet that Seattle does have a reputation for gloominess and overcast weather that outpaces anything the tiny and shrinkingly relevant UK has.

  44. I worked at an office that already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i.e. Google. I feel compelled to mention this since other commenters don't seem to know. Google installed video cameras to watch pretty much every part of the offices, including over desks since the spring of 2014 (in the NY office), and I saw the same when I worked in the Bay Area offices more recently as well. As I remember Spring 2014, it was just after the first google-powered android watches came out, which they gave employees as a Christmas present, and I thought the whole thing was pretty spooky -- cameras watching us, plus free watches that were encouraged to be used (lots of data can be gathered from watches). In 2015 I remarked on the cameras to a friend (Salesforce employee) and he said surely that's illegal? But no, they've been doing it for years, and so Comcast can claim hey, one of the "best places to work" already offers this and people don't complain.

  45. my last company did this.. by drewsup · · Score: 1

    cameras with microphones in the ceiling that covered the whole workspace, as managers we were allowed into the office for 45 mins in morning and at end of day for paperwork and email correspondence, otherwise the office was supposed to be empty with everyone doing field work. South Carolina is one of those wonderful "work at will" states, so I willed myself to work elsewhere....

    1. Re:my last company did this.. by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Wait...why did you even have an office then? What was the point?

  46. not as bad as it sounds by Joe+Haskins · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people putting the "big brother" spin on this and talking about watching employees. I certainly agree that watching your employees' every move accomplishes nothing.

    On the other hand, if you run a business like a gas station, convenience store, fast food restaurant, etc then watching the public areas and the outside of business with cameras is a good idea. As for who monitors the footage, that's simple: there's no need to monitor it 24/7. Just review it when you need to (ie if something happened).

    Normally, I'd happily jump on the Comcast bashing train. But as they like to tout, their ability to put together a turnkey solution has helped attract more business to the Green Light program here in Detroit. There are other components to the program besides the surveillance (ie increased lighting, and visible signage that they are a part of the program). All together, it makes customers feel safer at their business, and discourages troublemakers.

    Some people are put off by the additional surveillance and the idea that the police can see them, but others like the feeling of safety and are more willing to stop in an area where they might not otherwise. Speaking with various police officers in my area, they have admitted that while some businesses experience small drop in customers initially, things usually rebound as the businesses attract a better class of customer.

    In Detroit, even with the cameras feeding to police headquarters, it isn't a 24/7 big brother scenario. Let's face it, everyone has better things to do, including the police. They're not scrutinizing the footage for every person who jaywalks or litters or "forgot" to renew their license plate. However, if something does happen at a Green Light location, the police are able to quickly access footage (and view it in realtime if the incident is still occurring) and the outcome is typically a lot better.

    Imagine two scenarios:

    Scenario A:
    Someone is robbed at a gas station in the middle of the night. When the police arrive, all they have is the description of a person or vehicle from the victim which may not be very accurate. The next morning, the police are able to get ahold of the owner of the station and have him pull the security footage. Assuming it's even usable (ie good quality, good lighting/nigh vision), by the time the police get it the perpetrator is long gone.

    Scenario B:
    Someone is robbed at a gas station in the middle of the night. As the squad car is being dispatched, someone at police headquarters is able to access high-quality footage of the incident and provide a reliable description of the perpetrator and/or their vehicle to the responding officers and other officers in the area. An officer notices someone matching the description walking a few blocks from where the incident happened, stops them, and is able to make an arrest before they've had hours or days to disappear.

    1. Re:not as bad as it sounds by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of people putting the "big brother" spin on this and talking about watching employees. I certainly agree that watching your employees' every move accomplishes nothing.

      Yes it does. It accomplishes acceptance of the surveillance state everywhere.

      All together, it makes customers feel safer at their business, and discourages troublemakers.

      I don't want to be safe, I want to be free. What are customers doing in restricted areas or offices where employees are.

      they have admitted that while some businesses experience small drop in customers initially,

      Ridiculous, as if the police give a fuck about a businesses customers enough to know what happened *before* the cameras were installed.

      Imagine two scenarios:

      Both scenarios refer to publicly accessible spaces and have nothing to do with cameras monitoring the workplace.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  47. Calm Your Tits, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just calm the fuck down. This isn't some new draconian invention. It's just a plain old security camera system like you'd find around many business, warehouses, retail stores...

    The "difference" here is that, thanks to Comacast, it's really very expensive. The camera's are expensive, the installation is expensive... They've also replaced the onsite DVR of most systems with their cloud storage offering, which makes is ridiculously expensive. That cloud storage will also conveniently require higher/more bandwidth, from Comcast. Clearly, it's a win win. For Comcast, anyway.

    This is just a security camera system. SO, calm your tits. Besides, it's so expensive that the uptake on this offering is almost certainly going to be so low that they'll discontinue the package within a year.

  48. That's kinda ironic by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Since you're basically asking for more government intervention (stronger privacy laws) to government style takeovers (e.g. Communism).

    Yeah, I'm baiting you. But I'm doing it because I'm annoyed that you're instantly equating something you don't like (being monitored by a private company you work for) with something else you don't like (government telling you to do things you don't want to do).

    It's something I see a _lot_ here in America. Folks are all for Government doing the things they want but if it's something their opposed to (Gun Control, Abortion legislation/regulation, paying your taxes so folks can have clean water, take your pick) they cry out oppression and demand somebody cut, cut cut that evil bureaucracy. It's hypocritical and it's one of the reasons why we can't have Nice Things (tm).

    Basically, everybody wants government on their side but as soon as they have to pony up tax dollars to make it work for somebody else they're all being oppressed.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: That's kinda ironic by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      A decade or so back when the economy was collapsing, the news reported on a heavily armed couple who were losing their house and barricaded themselves inside. They told the cops, media, etc that Jesus had come to them and told them they did not have to pay "the mortgage tax". Which nicely sums up a segment of the US population's attitudes regarding firearms, religion, capitalism and government. Beyond a doubt they voted Trump.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  49. Who cares about morale by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I care about productivity. It's easy enough to measure that and if this works, businesses will do it. In the few places where there's competition for workers left you won't see this crap, but for us rank and file we'll suck it down. Especially as outsourcing, H1-Bs and automation devour job opportunities in a world where quality of life is increasingly tied to your job.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  50. Re:And you will need to rent Comcast internet hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This pissed me off as well. I had bought the exact same modem that they rent online and they refused to give me a static IP unless I rented the modem from them. So I sucked it up and bought the modem from them and they refused to give me a static IP unless I rented the modem from them. (Allegedly, because they can't control the modem unless it's theirs, which is bunk because they have full control over the modem whether you rent or buy it.)

    /Not a Comcast Business customer anymore.

  51. Re:And you will need to rent Comcast internet hard by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    file an fcc complaint.

    But with trump that may not do any thing.

  52. I was at a company that did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at a company that did this, and it just made the managers lazy dictatorial shits that thought they could manage by snooping. Funny part is after I left a manager got caught running a scam that netted 7 figures over 10 years. The surveillance never helped them catch that. It really just made everything worse and everyone antagonistic and shallow and actively undermining. You would get railed on for stupid deviations while the real criminals would sail. Big bosses LOVE the idea big brother style overseeing, it's no different anywhere. you can treat humans like ants, but the humans are going to burn your house down one day.

  53. Rise of the Robot Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the perfect example of how human workers will be eventually replaced by robots.
    A robot can be trusted 100%. They will force all human workers to quit.
    There will be a surveillance society or a robot society. Choose your fate, humans.

  54. Next Headline by n329619 · · Score: 1

    Comcast CEO found to be doing NSFW activities in office by Workplace Surveillance

    Comcast Cancelled Workplace Surveillance services

  55. Phase II by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Entering beta testing in 2018; employees will be automatically given negative feedback by embedded AI, based on their recorded behavioral profile, using modified Taser technology.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  56. Do they lease the cameras too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We currently lease cameras and a server from a vendor that specializes in security cameras/recording. While the summary goes off the rails into conspiracy theory territory, the reality is the cameras are used for insurance purposes to monitor multi-hundred thousands of dollar equipment, areas where semi-trucks navigate on the property, and general exterior security for theft/vandalism deterrence. The only cameras that are monitored live are the ones that keep an eye on the semi-trucks so that we don't have trucks idling waiting to be loaded/unloaded (time is money for all involved). The rest of the cameras get recorded and called back as needed. In the past year I have had a grand total of 4 requests for video footage. 1 request due to vandalism on a property, and 3 requests related to damage to equipment that needed to be reviewed for insurance purposes. The only problem I see with Comcast offering this service is that mean all the cameras then have to connected to the Internet and rely on Outbound bandwidth which is limited to begin with. We can barely get 3FPS from cameras off-site over our current Comcast service to the location that has the server.