Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Detect A Mysterious Flash Of X-Rays From A Faraway Galaxy (nytimes.com)

"It was a spark in the night. A flash of X-rays from a galaxy hovering nearly invisibly on the edge of infinity. Astronomers say they do not know what caused it." Slashdot reader schwit1 quotes the New York Times: The orbiting Chandra X-ray Observatory, was in the midst of a 75-day survey of a patch of sky known as the Chandra Deep Field-South, when it recorded the burst from a formerly quiescent spot in the cosmos. For a few brief hours on Oct 1, 2014, the X-rays were a thousand times brighter than all the light from its home galaxy, a dwarf unremarkable speck almost 11 billion light years from here, in the constellation Fornax. Then whatever had gone bump in the night was over and the X-rays died.

The event as observed does not fit any known phenomena, according to Franz Bauer, an astronomer at Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, and lead author of a report to be published in Science.

He described some possible explanation in a blog post this week -- for example, a star being torn apart by a black hole, or the afterglow from a gamma ray burst seen sideways -- but the spectrum readings aren't a match, according to the Times. "None of the usual cosmic catastrophe suspects work."

83 comments

  1. Shepard! by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly someone destroyed the Reapers.

    1. Re:Shepard! by JoeMerchant · · Score: 0

      It was the sound of Trillions of Trillions of voices screaming out in agony, then suddenly silenced.

    2. Re:Shepard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must have been droning on about mysterious astronomical observations.

  2. ZOMG by luna69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Astronomical observations don't always need to be reported as "mysterious," tbh.

    --
    No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    1. Re:ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It is standard operating procedure to encourage continued funding. Trump has a lot of the propellorheads kind of nervous, so we expect to see higher volumes of these stories.

    2. Re: ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mysterious when we don't know what it is. If it were a supernova it would be cool but not somysterious

    3. Re:ZOMG by jittles · · Score: 0

      Astronomical observations don't always need to be reported as "mysterious," tbh.

      Plus everyone on this website already knows what happened a long long time ago in a galaxy far away.

    4. Re:ZOMG by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually we also know what happened in three quantum states, canon, extended universe and non-canon.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:ZOMG by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, if Trump thinks we might be attacked by aliens......

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:ZOMG by penandpaper · · Score: 2

      Not saying it was aliens. But it was aliens. It's always aliens.

    7. Re:ZOMG by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Word. That's why I loved Rogue One and despised Star Wars VII.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:ZOMG by Grismar · · Score: 1

      "Mysterious report of astronomical observations doesn't suggest alien origin." Readers and scientists are baffled.

    9. Re:ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if we don't know what it is, then it is mysterious. I hate mysteries too, but pretending they are normal does not encourage anyone to contemplate or work on the mystery.

    10. Re:ZOMG by Le+Marteau · · Score: 2

      > It is standard operating procedure to encourage continued funding.

      Don't be saying that! Next thing you know, the conspiritards will say that climate change press releases are being hyped up in order to encourage funding!

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    11. Re: ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that galaxy wasnt "hovering".

    12. Re:ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't know what caused it, and it fits no known phenomena, I think that by definition qualifies as mysterious. No one said it was aliens....

    13. Re:ZOMG by lucm · · Score: 1

      > It is standard operating procedure to encourage continued funding.

      Don't be saying that! Next thing you know, the conspiritards will say that climate change press releases are being hyped up in order to encourage funding!

      Those press releases are a red herring designed to generate controversy and thwart any organized initiative to fight global warming. The end game is to raise the temperature to a point that will make the planet more comfortable for our reptilians overlord.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    14. Re: ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also "unknown" when we don't know what it is and has been used for to create even more dramatic statements when about UFOs.
      Perhaps we should start calling them MFOs instead.

    15. Re:ZOMG by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Astronomical observations don't always need to be reported as "mysterious," tbh.

      No they don't, These x-ray sources were called Quasars and mysterious, now seen as the birth of a super massive black hole,
      http://chandra.harvard.edu/xra...

  3. That's it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rebels are there! -set your course for the Hoth system.

  4. Old news by alexo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This "mysterious" Flash form a faraway galaxy has been mentioned in print since the '30s.
    Here's a youtube video that gives a brief explanation.

    1. Re:Old news by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Excellent. I propose that you submit an application to slashdot to get the formal "Oblig." tag to that link whenever an astronomical (or other) article mentions a flash.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  5. Seems obvious. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Clearly aliens have really bright flashes on their cameras. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re: Seems obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying that the aliens are Japanese?

    2. Re:Seems obvious. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      "So what I did here Zorphax, is wire it up so all four sides of the flash cube would fire at once and then added an extra 9v battery on the side to give it a little extra push! Say Cheese"!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  6. When did it happen? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What would be interesting is if they told us when the event happened. 11 billion light years away didn't happen last nite. How do we know that half the stars in the sky aren't already dead their last bit of light hasn't gotten here yet..

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:When did it happen? by fisted · · Score: 4, Funny

      if they told us when the event happened. 11 billion light years away didn't happen last nite.

      Yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

      I wonder how long it takes light to travel 11 billion light years. Maybe if someone could figure that out, we could tell when the event happened.

    2. Re:When did it happen? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      11 billion light years away didn't happen last nite

      No, it happened somewhere around 11 billion years ago

    3. Re:When did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not, as these were x-rays that were detected.

    4. Re:When did it happen? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Your point being?

    5. Re: When did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it was a long time ago in a galaxy far far away? That's what we're saying, right?

    6. Re:When did it happen? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no shit, Sherlock.

      I wonder how long it takes light to travel 11 billion light years.

      Hey Sherlock! Did you remember to account for the expansion of the universe since the event?

      Didn't think so.
      Sincerely, Mycroft.

    7. Re:When did it happen? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Hey Mycroft! So what you're trying to tell me us is that this light, that traveled 11 billion light years, didn't take 11 billion years to travel?

      May I by any chance subscribe to your newsletter?

      Didn't think so.
      Sincerely, Sherlock.

    8. Re:When did it happen? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      This thread needed its "light doesn't travel at infinite speed' guy. Looks like you're that guy. Congrats.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    9. Re:When did it happen? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Nope, read the article again. You were making fun of Stan as if it was all so simple, but you got it wrong. His question was legitimate.

      "11 billion light years away" is nowhere near the same as "11 billion years ago" due to cosmic expansion.
      I think TFA got it wrong too. The galaxy is *not* 11Gly away.

      Though I'm also tempted to make fun of Stan, given his terrible spelling and grammar, I know if I did I'd a mistake make too.

    10. Re:When did it happen? by fisted · · Score: 1

      The galaxy is *not* 11Gly away.

      The question was about the when, not the where.

    11. Re:When did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I wonder how long it takes light to travel 11 billion light years? Maybe if someone could figure that out...

      I like your math jokes! (there are some with no coffee that may not get it- but they were English majors anyway).

    12. Re:When did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all depends. does that 11-billion-light-years take account of the universe expansion? (e.g. it is 11-billion-light-years away "right now", or was it emitted 11-billion-years-ago, and the current distance is much farther than 11-billion-light-years?).

    13. Re:When did it happen? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'm wondering if I should jump in as Relativity Guy and start pointing out that this time stuff isn't fixed. Heck, from the point of view of the X-rays, they just left that galaxy, and referring to the time when the EM radiation gets here is very convenient in some respects.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    14. Re:When did it happen? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      If you'd deigned to read section 2.1 of the paper (yes, I know it's Slashdot, but you do know how to red don't you - or are you one of those new millennia things who clicks but cant read?), you'd know that the reporting scientists

      discovered a fast X-ray transient midway through one of the observations starting at 2014 October 01 07:04:37 UT.

      Science paper have this terrible habit of containing things called "details" which casual (or even professional) readers might care to know about the event or topic under discussion. This revolutionary concept has only been in use for 350-odd years (some damned peculiar years!), so the jury is still out on the idea, but I personally find it useful, if I actually read the published details.

      (Your reading will of course allow you to be more precise. Since the observations lasted some 50ks, there is still some lack of clarity in that statement.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  7. The beserkers killed another star by mveloso · · Score: 1

    At least they aren't getting any closer.

    1. Re:The beserkers killed another star by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

      The universe is still expanding. Maybe something hit a wall. A Huuuuuuuuge Wallllllll!

      I'm sorry, I just could not help myself. Mod me down, I deserve it.

    2. Re:The beserkers killed another star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metamoderate the moderator -1, lacks_sense_of_humor.

      Parent post should be +funny.

    3. Re:The beserkers killed another star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES

  8. 1 Oct 2014? That explains it. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Back in 2014, on 1st of October I felt a great disturbance in the Force. It was as though millions of souls cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:1 Oct 2014? That explains it. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is only two and a half light years behind.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  9. only a selfie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone in heaven did a selfie, and humans detected the flash.
    Just kidding, not from heaven but hell.

  10. News from 11 billion years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is getting worse day after day

  11. The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happen? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    X-rays, of course, are a form of electromagnetic radiation (as is light), and travel at the speed of light

    I wonder how long it takes light to travel 11 billion light years. Maybe if someone could figure that out, we could tell when the event happened.

    An interesting thing to note is that the source wasn't 11 billion light years away when the light was emitted-- it was only 2.2 billion light years away back then. It took the light 11 billion years to travel that 2.2 billion light year distance at the speed of light.

    Sounds paradoxical, doesn't it! That's the expansion of the universe in a nutshell.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  12. It's always the last place you look by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    A flash of X-rays from a galaxy hovering nearly invisibly on the edge of infinity

    To paraphrase Crichton...

    Life will, uh, find... a ray.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not saying it's aliens... but it's aliens!

    1. Re:Obligatory... by LesFerg · · Score: 2

      So have they analysed the burst for data content? It could have been a civilization broadcasting all of their knowledge in one great encyclopedia.
      Sadly, we weren't here to catch the public encryption key they published a billion years earlier.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    2. Re:Obligatory... by lucm · · Score: 1

      A billion years is a long time. 600 years ago there was no printing press. 20 years ago there was no Wikipedia. Who knows what will happen in 10, 50, 100 years.

      A civilization that existed a billion years ago would very likely have mastered space travel by now. Maybe they're here with us to see that flash. Maybe we are them.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  14. Light-year reporting. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    You know, it's bad enough observing events that happened a few billion light years ago.

    Did we really think the give-a-shit factor was going to somehow improve waiting over two years to report on it?

    Fucking hell...

  15. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the universe is expanding wouldn't the distance that the light has to travel also expand as well during the journey? So really the light would have traveled more then 2.2 billion light years distance?

  16. war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some planet just nuked itself in global thermonuclear war.

  17. Fear not, It will all be over soon by mysidia · · Score: 1

    The Shock burst preceding the event that sparked the Vacuum Decay Wave.
    Well.... it was nice knowing you all. Have fun in next Universe. Goodnight.

  18. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by LesFerg · · Score: 1

    Also, given the gravitational masses and movement of galaxies and other matter in between, why is time expected to be functioning at the same rate across the distance those rays have traveled? In fact, couldn't time dilation present the appearance of an expanding universe, if only observed from one location?

    --
    If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  19. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

    If the universe is expanding wouldn't the distance that the light has to travel also expand as well during the journey? So really the light would have traveled more then 2.2 billion light years distance?

    Exactly. The two points were 2.2 billion light years apart when the light started travelling, but due to the fact that space was expanding as the light travelled, the distance travelled was 11 billion light years, not 2.2.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  20. constellation Fornax? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    Constellation Fornax? Edge of infnity? (And beyond!)

    Did someone publish the script for another episode of Toy Story?

  21. Obviously aliens by caviare · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time the human race used to reason along the following lines: "I don't understand, therefore it must be a god, the devil or evil spirits".

    This explanation having gradually fallen into disrepute, now a large portion of the human race seems to reason: "I don't understand, therefore it must be aliens".

    No doubt an explanation will be found one day.

  22. Brightness != flux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this were a directed beam, an x-ray laser, then it need not have been that immense a light source. Not "Brighter then the sun in the galaxy". Well yes actually Brighter in the true sense of the word bright, but not more light than the sun

    1. Re:Brightness != flux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The X-ray event is comprised of 115+1211 net 0.3-7.0 keV counts, with a light curve characterised by a 100 s rise time, a peak 0.3-10 keV flux of 5×1012 erg s1 cm2, and a power-law decay time slope of 1.53±0.27. The average spectral slope is =1.43+0.230.13, with no clear spectral variations."

      This is actually pretty low energy stuff. In other words Bright, but not very Hot. There were no higher Energy X/Gamma Rays detected, so it appears that that the mystery is what probably outraged some interstellar gasbag enough to produce it, while not leaving a footprint of its own.
      Can we use it on Trump?

  23. A long time ago in a galaxy far far away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death Star go Boom

  24. great disturbance by n4wff · · Score: 1

    "as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced"

    1. Re:great disturbance by quenda · · Score: 1

      Too soon. ... You joke, but it may well have wiped out one or many advanced lifeforms.
      Perhaps regular events like these sterilised planets and prevented complex live from developing for the first 10 billion years of so of the universe's history, and only now are a few of us getting lucky enough to make it this far.

    2. Re:great disturbance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing.

  25. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by quenda · · Score: 1

    So how far away is the source now? I'd guess a lot more than 11Gly.
      GN-z11 is 32 billion light years away, but 13.4 billion years old as observed.

  26. maybe... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Totally not a physicist but 11 billion light years? Maybe the wave pattern doesn't look familiar because it had to travel through so much expanding space to get here.

  27. Re: The universe is expanding...Re:When did it hap by ian_billyboy_morris · · Score: 1

    That would mean that the space between Galaxies was expanding faster than light wouldn't it? I remember reading that there was no reason it couldn't do, but wasn't aware of evidence that it could.

  28. Nearly as fast, but not faster than light by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    That would mean that the space between Galaxies was expanding faster than light wouldn't it?

    No, if the space between were actually expanding faster than light, the light would never get there-- it would lose ground. The space between the source and us is expanding almost, but not quite, as fast as the light is traveling through it, so the light does get here eventually.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Nearly as fast, but not faster than light by plague911 · · Score: 1

      For Newtonian physics wouldn't the expansion have to be 2c for the light to lose ground if both objects were traveling equal but opposite directions?

  29. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it works like everything at this level... pull it back slowly, push it forward fast (spring guns, crossbows, bow and arrow, catapult).

    So once it stops expanding and starts collapsing, is the collapse instantaneous to generate the most power?

  30. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by syntotic · · Score: 1

    But something that was there is no longer there, when will we know for sure?

  31. It must be... by dddux · · Score: 1

    Chaotica with his X-ray gun. But he didn't take in account that it takes 11 billion years to reach us. Ha! ;) Take that, Chaotica.

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  32. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the photons no time at all had passed from the moment they were created in the conflagration until, that same moment, billions of light years away, it hit our detector.

  33. Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Death Star destroying Alderaan really happened?

  34. Question... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    If this source is soooo far away, wouldn't we see redshift of some sort?
    If we are getting XRay frequencies, might this burst have started at a higher bandwidth - like Gamma?

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  35. Re:The universe is expanding...Re:When did it happ by strikethree · · Score: 1

    Except the universe is not expanding. For some reason, people seem to think that there is "one time" for the entire universe. As If the universe is 13.7 billion years old. Laughable on its face. It appears as if nobody has internalized the Theory of Relativity. There are "areas" of the universe where 13.7 billion years have not been "experienced" and there are areas of the universe where 13.7 trillion (yes, not billion) years have been "experienced".

    Simple proof: GPS Satellites experience 42 microseconds (roughly) more time passing, per day (day/night), than the same clocks on the surface of the planet. Over the 4 billion years that the planet has been in existence, that 42 microsecond difference adds up to significant amounts of time.

    Further evidence: Galaxy rotation and Dark Matter

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  36. Time is relative by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    Different observers see time passing at different rates, of course, and thus the rate of expansion is indeed observer dependent. But all of the observers still see the universe expanding.

    It's a trivially small effect, though, unless you're in a gravity well so deep you're poised on the edge of an event horizon, or moving at speeds that are a significant fraction of the speed of light.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com