Slashdot Mirror


Companies Start Implanting Microchips Into Workers' Bodies (latimes.com)

A Swedish start-up called Epicenter is offering to implant its employees and start-up members with microchips that function as swipe cards, allowing them to open doors, operate equipment or buy food and drinks with a wave of the hand. While these microchips have been available for decades, the technology has never been implanted in humans on such a broad scale. "Epicenter and a handful of other companies are the first to make chip implants broadly available," reports Associated Press. From the report: [A]s with most new technologies, it raises security and privacy issues. Although the chips are biologically safe, the data they generate can show how often employees come to work or what they buy. Unlike company swipe cards or smartphones, which can generate the same data, people cannot easily separate themselves from the chips. Epicenter, which is home to more than 100 companies and roughly 2,000 workers, began implanting workers in January 2015. Now, about 150 workers have the chips. A company based in Belgium also offers its employees such implants, and there are isolated cases around the world in which tech enthusiasts have tried them out in recent years. The small implants use near-field communication technology, or NFC, the same as in contactless credit cards or mobile payments. When activated by a reader a few inches away, a small amount of data flows between the two devices via electromagnetic waves. The implants are "passive," meaning they contain information that other devices can read, but cannot read information themselves. Ben Libberton, a microbiologist at Stockholm's Karolinska Institute, says hackers could conceivably gain huge swaths of information from embedded microchips. The ethical dilemmas will become bigger the more sophisticated the microchips become. Epicenter workers stage monthly events where attendees can receive the implant.

21 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Meta data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can they scan the real-time position of the chip? Because very morning they'll measure about 30 minutes of rapid wrist motion on the right arm and slow finger movements on the left...

    1. Re:Meta data? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Learning guitar, eh? Good for you. Builds character.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Meta data? by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      Or, they'll match the days you skip the wank and go to work horny with your least productive days and then require everyone to have an orgasm before coming in to work.

  2. This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A bracelet with the chip in it would be a much better alternative, with no need to implant anything, cause tissue scarring, risk infection, etc.

    Seriously, it could be a silicone band. Or a ring. Or a little sticker you could apply to any piece of jewelry you want.

    1. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by InvalidsYnc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the point is more of that it cannot be separated from the person. You have to steal a body part to impersonate them, vs just snagging the band/ring/etc.

      Not that I condone it, just speaking to one of the reasons why something that cannot be easily separated from someone would have an advantage.

    2. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let me point out that people used to get their cars stolen. Then anti-theft chipped keys came along and we got car jackings and home invasions.

      So, if you work in a secure facility that someone really wants into... this ensures the bad guys always know where the keys are and how to get them, and you're not going to like it when they do.

      It's just a bad idea. This company's doing it as a PR gimmick.

    3. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, if you work in a secure facility that someone really wants into... this ensures the bad guys always know where the keys are and how to get them, and you're not going to like it when they do.

      Note to self: do not implant secure access microchip in dick.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    4. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      Don't forget about the implant ripping out of your body if you get an MRI.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    5. Re: This is unnecessary and stupid by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Badges can be faked, so I've always been a fan of the badge being a link to call up a digital version that can be used with live facial recognition (be it human or computer-based).

      There's a big difference between a little 'cut and paste' on a physical ID (though that can be a pretty impressive criminal art) and inserting a complete record into a (hopefully fairly secure) database.

    6. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by ctilsie242 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This just oozes stupid. To boot, we already had a company (VeriChip) already try this over a decade ago, to at best a ho-hum audience. Here is why this sucks:

      1: The chip can't really be updated. If there is a security break, the insecure chip is there forever.
      2: Someone can be looking for the company employees to target them.
      3: With how employees are hired/fired, having an armful of chips will suck over time.
      4: I read about bad reactions to these in animals.
      5: This is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Nobody glues a mechanical key to their body for a reason.

      If a company wants to ensure individuals can get in without an ID card, go with biometrics and a PIN, the biometrics being a "username", the PIN being the password. If a company wants higher security than a badge, have a badge + PIN, badge + biometrics, or all three. That will work for 99.99% of all security needs.

    7. Re:This is unnecessary and stupid by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 4, Informative
      This bullshit is so old. Here's Robyn Curnow's article on having a microchip removed after getting it implanted to obtain "VIP" access at a bar around 13 years ago:

      http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/10/05/spark.bajabeach

      Once back home in London, I begin to feel uncomfortable and unsure about my VIP status.

      The Baja Web site assures that getting rid of the microchip is a simple and harmless procedure, something like removing a splinter.

      But the two doctors I consult in London's Harley Street disagree. Getting the microchip became serious business.

      Hard to find

      General practitioner Dr. Stuart Sanders referred me to consultant plastic surgeon Lena Andersson as soon as he realized he could not feel the microchip.

      It was buried so deep inside my upper arm that Andersson sent me off for an X-ray, and even that did not help the doctors.

      Although the microchip was visible on the X-ray, it was impossible to pinpoint the exact location in my arm as it was nowhere near the point of insertion.

      Finding it involved surgery at the clinic and a severe dose of post-Baja regret. One night out in Barcelona has permanently seared into my upper left arm.

      While splayed out on an operating table -- once again anaesthetized -- Andersson removed the chip using a high-tech sensor X-ray and two monitors to guide her to it.

      The missing microchip was finally located -- more than a centimeter away from where it was inserted.

      Andersson later explained that it was so difficult to remove because it was so small and soft.

      "It is very soft. I understand why we had a problem finding it. You couldn't feel it and I couldn't feel it. The smaller they are, the more difficult they are to get out."

      So, now I have a small microchip the size of a large piece of Basmati rice in a specimen jar as a souvenir -- I also have eight-millimeter scar on my upper left arm.

  3. Michel Jackson Faraday gloves by judoguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Problem solved!

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
  4. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think you need to reassess the term 'voluntary', as there are many ways that corporate management can 'entice' you to 'volunteer' against your will. It's a slippery slope here, and as a previous poster mentioned not only invades privacy beyond what is required to achieve the desired function (unlock a door, purchase lunch), but also imposes health risks that many may not wish to undertake merely for the sake of employment.

  5. Late April fool by chirone · · Score: 2

    I hope it's a late April fool

  6. Finally! The restroom problem is solved by DutchSter · · Score: 4, Funny

    At long last, we can figure out which jerk is using all the toilet paper and clogging the plumbing. As a bonus we can improve employee health!

    Dear employee: We have noticed that you are using an average of 9.8 squares of toilet paper per wipe, and wiping an average of 19 times, 3.2 seconds per wipe, four times per day, and yet only spend an average of 6.4 seconds at the sink. And by the way, using your right hand for that is just nasty. Please report to the Employee Wellness center for voluntary tips on how to wash your hands and increase your fiber intake.

  7. Re:Not a big deal by RazorSharp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's a dangerous way of thinking. The problem is that making microchip implants ordinary opens the door for these type of things to be abused. First it's just voluntary for those who want to work for a particular company, then it's just ordinary for those who work for particular industries, then it's just your driver's license. At first all it does is open doors, and then later iterations will monitor your location and health and who you interact with.

    Sure, it's a slippery slope argument but slippery slope arguments aren't necessarily fallacious. This has already happened with cell phones. They started as a niche device and now it's difficult to function in society without one. And they collect all your information and make privacy obsolete. It doesn't take a ridiculous amount of foresight to see the dangers of certain technologies. George Orwell predicted the danger of televisions with cameras/microphones connected to the internet in 1949 yet we still allow these things in our home without demanding legislative protections to our privacy.

    I see a problem here.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  8. Black Mirror by RazorSharp · · Score: 3

    Sometimes I think that corporations watch Black Mirror for ideas.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  9. Re:Clone RFID by fisted · · Score: 3, Informative

    RFID chips can be made as impossible to clone as smart cards.
    No, gaining access to the smart card contact pads won't help you in any way, neither will MITMing it.

    IOW you're full of shit.

  10. I'd claim religious exemption by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

    Okay, I'm not really religious, but for this I'd convert! Enemy of the enemy.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  11. Creepy, human cattle by evolutionary · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Basically it's like branding cattle. Of course this could be done through rings, bracelets, or even simple rfid's in wallets, but the point is you CAN'T remove it when you want. I suspect this is a test/beginning in getting people to be branded just like livestock. The trouble is, like livestock, we'll have zero privacy (see the movie "Minority Report": the possibilities there (knowing what to market to you while passing through a mall) are similar to what is already happening now to quieter degree). People need to recognize the purpose of a design, and when they see it it works against them, say "no". People aren't vocalizing their concerns enough on this one. We all want to be a part of the A future. The question is, which future do we really want long term.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
  12. Been available for dogs & cats for years by klubar · · Score: 4, Informative

    This technology has been available for dogs & cats for years. Most dogs and outdoor cats are "microchipped" so the local ACO (animal control officer) or shelter can identify the owner. I've even seen it used with fish and other marine animals at the aquarium.

    Not a new technology, and well proven.

    Whether it's a good idea is another question.