Slashdot Mirror


Bannon Loses National Security Council Role in Trump Shakeup (bloomberg.com)

Top presidential strategist Steve Bannon has been booted from the National Security Council amid a reshuffling of the key panel, Bloomberg reports Wednesday morning. President Donald Trump reorganized the council, removing Bannon and downgrading the role of his homeland security adviser, Tom Bossert, the report added, citing multiple sources. From the report: Bannon, the former executive chairman of Breitbart News, was elevated to the National Security Council's principals committee at the beginning of Trump's presidency. The move drew criticism from some members of Congress and Washington's foreign policy establishment. A White House official said that Bannon was placed on the committee in part to monitor Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, and never attended a meeting. He's no longer needed with McMaster in charge of the council, the official said. Trump fired Flynn on Feb. 13 for not disclosing to the president or to Vice President Mike Pence the extent of his conversations with Russia's ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak, before Trump's inauguration.

14 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This is relevant, how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is this on Slashdot?

    Because national security policy drives information security policy. (See, for example, the thread about DHS scaling up invasive border procedures, most of the victims of whom will be innocent Americans.)

  2. Trump's wall is burning down, burning down... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    burning down. Trump's wall is burning down, and he lit the fire.

    Seriously though, he is already alienated from half the population of the United States. The people he put in position around himself profoundly represent the half that likes him, which is why he put them there. The path he is taking will leave him completely alone even across the populace. He will have nothing but his paranoia to keep him company. The idea of that makes me nervous.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  3. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stuff that matters, read a few more bytes into the tagline.

  4. Well that's all interesting and good... by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But how come no story on Susan Rice having unmasked multiple people in the Trump camp. It should be noted that she stated "she didn't do it, and had no knowledge of it." And of course that was proven untrue. And now we're seeing the claims making the rounds of "It wasn't political" but why wasn't the FBI involved then? Why did she do something that was outside of the preview of her job(advise the President and consume intelligence summaries)? Why does this appear to have been a case of her setting a new precedent(the unmasking). Why were they unmasked by her, when all 3 letter agencies could do this on their own if they're conducting an investigation.

    And of course, why are so many of the media silent on this. When they were all over other major events similar to this and licking their chops like a dog seeing a steak. Well you can all have fun now.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Well that's all interesting and good... by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well you can feel whatever way you want about it, but considering you have multiple agencies stating that there was no evidence or said evidence was circumstantial at best. I'm sure that's working out great for you. I'm guessing you'll be right there in supporting republicans and their demands that she come for an under-oath interview right? That should clean it all up very quickly. It's not like they'd have to subpena her or anything, like several investigative committees did to the current head of the DEA because of bureaucratic stonewalling.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Well that's all interesting and good... by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm just going to leave this right here. Then when you get to the parts where your arguments fall apart you can let me know.

      If the investigations into Trump were politically motivated you would have heard about them in October.

      Funny thing, we found out about them about a month ago. And it was started right after Trump became the nominee. It *almost* seems like the previous president was hoping someone else was going to win, and they could simply sweep this egregious abuse of power under the rug.

      Kinda strange isn't it? How come you didn't hear about previous administrations doing this...

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Well that's all interesting and good... by bongey · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No Russia is distraction for Democrats to shift blame on how badly they lost the election.Prompted up by the Obama administration that politicized government agencies to hide the disaster know as Hillary Clinton. Too much CNN rots your brain. Imagine "Dick Cheney unmasked incoming Obama administration's transition team" , you liberals would be screaming bloody murder.

      First, there is NO solid evidence of any connection to Russia to Trump , that wasn't from a Obama political appointee.The entire Russian/Trump report was created by Obama appointees, not career intelligence officers. There wasn't 17 intellgience agencies that said Russia interfered in the election, there was one man named James Clapper created a report that said Russia interfered. Basically only 1 group , the NSA had any input and one person be James Clapper, the one who lied to congress, that Russia interfered with the election.

  5. Kushner by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bannon lasted longer than I thought he would. For a time it almost seemed like he might be able to outmaneuver the Kushners, but having Ivanka installed in the White House and having Jared running around as an official messenger and errand boy demonstrates that in the end, the only people Trump will ever really trust is his family.

    And that's fine by me. Whatever I think of Trump, I actually think the Kushners are half-way reasonable people, and it's a lot better having them whispering in his ear than that vile racist troll Bannon.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Kushner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Simpsons nail it again:

      Sideshow Bob: "Because you need me, Springfield. Your guilty conscience may move you to vote Democratic, but deep down you long for a cold-hearted Republican to lower taxes, brutalize criminals, and rule you like a king. That's why I did this, to save you from yourselves. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a city to run."

      capcha: stamped

  6. Remember kids... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bannon appointed himself to the NSC by having Trump signed off on an executive order that he didn't read and didn't find out about until it got mentioned in the media. Your tax dollars at work.

    On a related note, Trump had played twice as much golf in two months than Obama did in eight years.

    1. Re:Remember kids... by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We're seeing the end result of the Kushner's formal installation in the White House. There were some indications early on that Bannon might actually have outfoxed the Kushners, and indeed there were even suggestions Trump wasn't all that happy with his son-in-law. But now that Ivanka is formally in the White House, there simply isn't any room for Bannon. Bannon was useful because his Alt-right credentials gave Trump access to a fairly useful demographic, but people like that are very dangerous to keep by your side too long.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Re: Hitlery will not be running for office by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hillary Clinton was barely tolerated by half of the Democrat voters. That's why Hillary lost. Trump was a barely tolerated candidate among Republicans, but not quite weak enough to be defeated by Hillary Clinton. For example, take a look at her first-amendment positions and you'll see someone who is way to the right of center. When you have a choice between a Republican running as a Democrat and a Libertarian running as a Republican, is it any surprise that the latter wins?

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  8. Did I miss the Susan Rice scandal story here on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Political stories as long as they're fit the narrative eh?

  9. Re: This is relevant, how? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Civil War already established how that works.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire