Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Ends Support For Windows Vista; Begins To Roll Out Windows 10 Creators Update

On Tuesday, Microsoft began the roll out of Windows 10 Creators Update, the latest update of the company's desktop operating system. Incidentally, today is also the day Windows Vista, a decade-old OS as well as some parts of Office 2007 hit end of life. Earlier this month we asked Slashdot readers if they would be upgrading their computers to Windows 10 Creators Update. Many people answered with a resounding no.

103 comments

  1. Re:Not worth having by zlives · · Score: 2

    dont worry it will be.

  2. Do I have a choice? by Ostrich25 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I somehow suspect that Windows won't exactly give me the option to say 'no' to this update.

    1. Re:Do I have a choice? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Just disable the Windows Update service. You'll have to re-enable it eventually to get security updates, but at least this way you can control when the updates occur. I've had to do that since Win 10 keeps installing "updated" video drivers which don't work on my laptop. Every month I enable updates long enough to get the newest security updates (along with everything else Microsoft forces on you), then disable it again and reinstall the "older" working video drivers.

      FWIW, they did let you put off the Oct 2016 major update for as long as you wanted. It was treated much like the upgrade to Win 10 (in fact it used the same procedure - moving the previous system into Windows.old for 10 days* and allowing you to roll it back). Meaning you could end up with it automatically (and unwillingly) installed, but for the most part the customer was in control of it.

      * Yes they reduced the roll-back period from 30 days to 10 days. Was a major PITA since some of my clients experiencing problems with it didn't realize they'd been forcibly upgraded, and by the time they notified me of problems it was past the 10 day window and we had to restore from a backup to revert the system.

    2. Re:Do I have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "when" but not "what" is simply not acceptable.

      by working around the absurdity of microsoft force-feeding updates that often break otherwise working systems, you are only accepting this and every other horrible idea microsoft has rolled into their "latest" and not-so-greatest.

      you are, therefore, part of the problem.

      stand up, have a spine. don't use windows 10.

    3. Re:Do I have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years of Slashdot +5 comments about how Windows XP users should not be allowed to skip updates for systems connected to the internet, and now +5 comments whining that Windows 10 users are not allowed to skip out on updates while connected to the internet.

    4. Re:Do I have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to RMS, Linus and countless others; you sure do.

    5. Re:Do I have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good point because I've seen software vendors, like Parallels and SecureDoc (WinMagic encryption), specifically tell their customers NOT to install this update yet. Who's at fault when my SecureDoc encrypted machine won't boot? SecureDoc warned me not to update, but how can I stop Microsoft from doing it?

      (captcha: succumb)

    6. Re:Do I have a choice? by chipschap · · Score: 1

      stand up, have a spine. don't use windows 10.

      I continually ask why people put up with all this nonsense. Forced upgrades, can't modify the host file, spyware and adware baked in, Microsoft gets to decide if a rollback is allowed and for how long a period of time ... you just about completely give over control of your computer and your data, and you have to fight a continual uphill battle to wrestle back your seemingly obvious right to do with your computer any legal thing you wish, keep your private data private, and so on.

      Is Windows 10 so great that it's worth all of this? Yes, I know, I'm going to hear about how mission critical applications only run on Windows, the need to be compatible with others, and especially how my games will only work on Windows. I understand all that.

      But you need to understand in turn (and many people do not) that when you run Windows 10, you're making a choice. If what you get is worth what you give up, fine. It's not for me to tell you what to do, and your use of Windows 10 doesn't change my life in any way that I can see.

      Just please excuse me if I don't join you.

    7. Re:Do I have a choice? by CAOgdin · · Score: 1

      I'm with you...We're going to have to pass legislation on a national level to rein in Microsoft (and other greedy corporations) autocratic greed and forced customer behavior.

      When has ANY product before this be forced on people by the vendor? (I understand federal needs for things like new features in automobiles. However, I do not accept that GM, or any other vehicle manufacturer, has the right to tell me that THEY can dictate to me what tires I must buy, or when, specifically, I must surrender my vehicle for "periodic service" on THEIR schedule, not mine.)

      It's just another symptom of oligarchy gone wild!

    8. Re:Do I have a choice? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I somehow suspect that Windows won't exactly give me the option to say 'no' to this update.

      I have a question: Why would you? It's quite clear now that these Windows "updates" are nothing more than bundled security fixed with minor app updates. If anything this update will reduce the amount of telemetry collected if you already run an unadultered version of Windows 10.

      Frankly I have yet to find a single reason someone with Windows 10 would not want the Creators update. I say this ironically as I just disabled windows update as I'm on a shit slow internet connection and my youtubing takes priority :)

    9. Re:Do I have a choice? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I somehow suspect that Windows won't exactly give me the option to say 'no' to this update.

      I believe to get it you first have to log into an account with administrative perms so you can be prompted about something. So if you stick to a standard user account m you'll never be upgraded.

    10. Re:Do I have a choice? by exomondo · · Score: 2

      I somehow suspect that Windows won't exactly give me the option to say 'no' to this update.

      That's right, going forward they're trying to keep everybody up to date. It's much easier to address security and stability issues when the operating system is the same on all the systems, especially given the millions of different possible hardware configurations.

      But this is hardly a new thing, my Macs don't forcibly update but they certainly constantly ping me to tell me I should install and prompt to allow auto updates because keeping the OS up to date is generally a good thing. If you consider it an afront to your freedom or control then you wouldn't be using Windows anyway, instead you would use a Linux or BSD system and just use Windows in an isolated, sanitized VM if you need to do Windows-specific things.

    11. Re:Do I have a choice? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      >> Win 10 keeps installing "updated" video drivers which don't work on my laptop.

      They've published a procedure to fix that permanently so you don't have to keep fighting it.

      https://support.microsoft.com/...

      Tldr; device manager, find the device, right-click >> Properties >> Driver Tab >> Rollback Driver.

      That should block future updates to that driver.

      Related topic: can you send a nastygram to your video card manufacturer and ask them not to publish bad drivers to Windows Update? MS isn't developing these drivers, they are just passing on what the manufacturer provides.

      Full disclosure: I work for Microsoft, but this isn't paid shilling. I had the same problem on my personal kit and the above fixed it.

    12. Re: Do I have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the recommended maintenance schedule from the company that designed and providing warranty? The one to follow to prevent accidents and more expensive repairs? How dare they!

      And the writing on the wall for mass forced updates was the plan for over a decade as a result of fast broadband, increased quantities of devices and DoS attacks on record levels.

      Why do you ignore obvious solutions?

  3. Re:Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you are just in luck, then. The only updates from Microsoft are the forced kind, these days.

  4. Re:Happy Tuesday! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, you have to mod this +1 Funny

  5. XP 4 Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll use XP till it won't run anymore. M$ can go stuff it.

    1. Re:XP 4 Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

  6. Re:Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is you don't even use Windows or are lying...

  7. Can the update work on a Dell system? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Does it seem like Dell systems have a problem installing the Windows 10 Anniversary update? I had to do a clean install on my own Dell laptop. A friend's Dell desktop can't install the Anniversary update and may require a clean install.

    1. Re: Can the update work on a Dell system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem on my Dell. Maybe you have some odd partitioning going on. I know my Dell has a few partitions that I'd like to remove, but don't know if that would be bad.

    2. Re:Can the update work on a Dell system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually had similar issues I was just chalking up to my shitty satellite connectivity but that definitely gives me something to mull over. Interesting.

    3. Re: Can the update work on a Dell system? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I know my Dell has a few partitions that I'd like to remove, but don't know if that would be bad.

      That's what I thought too. When I dropped in a new SSD and reinstalled Windows, the exact same partitions from the old SSD got created again.

    4. Re:Can the update work on a Dell system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 dells in my office of 12 people havn't had a single issue.

    5. Re:Can the update work on a Dell system? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I actually had similar issues I was just chalking up to my shitty satellite connectivity but that definitely gives me something to mull over.

      As I told my friend, a clean install is a good reason to buy a new hard drive or SSD.

    6. Re:Can the update work on a Dell system? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      5 dells in my office of 12 people havn't had a single issue.

      If everyone had a Dell, over half had issues installing the Anniversary update?

    7. Re: Can the update work on a Dell system? by Holi · · Score: 1

      I thought this was a site for nerds, You really can't figure out what the restore partition, the efi partiton, and the boot partition are?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    8. Re: Can the update work on a Dell system? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Except that W10 trashed the partitions on one of my customers' machines. HP laptop, and I could see the recovery partition when viewed in a cradle via gparted, but the computer absolutely could not access that partition. Had to stump up for recovery discs (cheap, but a long time coming from HP) to get it back to out-of-box condition.

      W10 is an abomination. I'll stick to W7 until something better comes along.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    9. Re: Can the update work on a Dell system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's only one partition that really matters and it needs to be 350-450MB. Many older win7 installs had 100MB partitions that caused failed upgrade cycling.

    10. Re: Can the update work on a Dell system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen some pretty weird shit with EFI partitions on OEM systems. Usually it seems like they are doing it to restrict what you can do with the computer. It's just another symptom of not actually owning what you've paid for.

    11. Re: Can the update work on a Dell system? by Holi · · Score: 1

      What the fact that Windows disk utility cannot delete them? Just diskpart and clean.

      I stand by my previous statement.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  8. ... FORGETS To Roll Out Media Pack FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can Microsoft be so £$%^ing useless as to release a new version of windows but forget to release the Media Pack that THOUSANDS of the their customers need on updating ?

    Try some JOINED-UP THINKING, FFS !

  9. Re:Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious question, n ow that the HOSTS file cannot be changed is the Update Servers be blockable? Yes we can all google for answers, but I'm asking here- a real person- hoping to hear of any nuances or tips. Maybe at the modem or router? Maybe apply individual (security) updates and avoid the bloat/spyware?

    Thanks!

  10. Re:Happy Tuesday! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least +1 Poopy.

  11. I heard that Creators Update requires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that Creators Update requires that all administrator passwords be set to P@ssw0rd

  12. *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You let your smartphone update. Why not your desktop?

    1. Re: *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I don't let my phone update. I update only if it's a severe security flaw or about 2 months after they role out a new patch. I install and update on my terms.

    2. Re:*shrug* by armanox · · Score: 1

      I don't let me smartphone update without first reviewing and testing the updates, why would I do that to my desktop[s]?

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    3. Re:*shrug* by tepples · · Score: 1

      You let your smartphone update. Why not your desktop?

      I guess the difference is that major updates to Windows tend to break more functionality on which a business relies than updates to a smartphone operating system.

    4. Re:*shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because phones are not serious computing devices. I don't care what you think you can do on your phone, it is not a serious computing device.

    5. Re:*shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think ma and paw kettle know how to "review and test" updates? On their phone or computer?

      These pushes by Microsoft are for the 95%+ of users that are idiots and shouldn't be trusted to tie their own shoes...

    6. Re:*shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a device that holds all your passwords, communication methods, banking information, etc... is not serious? Well you're a special level of stupid aren't you...

    7. Re: *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rooted my phone to keep it from doing just that. Considering the update was causing phones to overheat, lock up, and burn through their batteries 20 times faster and I don't know if they ever fixed it (last I checked was several months after the deployment and the answer was NO), it was the right choice even if I didn't care normally.

      The far bigger question is why you are satisfied with the company owning the computer equipment you paid for and the data you have on it? And furthermore, why you cannot see why this is so unacceptable to so many?

    8. Re:*shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) No, I don't let me smartphone update. I update it manually.
      2) My smartphone is not my desktop. My smartphone is nowhere near as valuable nor does it contain anywhere close to as much sensitive data.

      Your question is akin to saying "You leave your umbrella in the holder by the door. Why not your wallet?"

    9. Re:*shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think I give a shit about "ma and paw kettle"?

      These pushes by Microsoft are malware. If they were merely for the clueless then they would be defaults, not hard-coded and impossible to change.

    10. Re:*shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony.

      If you are storing all of that shit on your phone, then you're the fucking moron.

    11. Re: *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, that makes them defaults, fucktard.

    12. Re: *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*
      You are confusing security and stability.

    13. Re:*shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have any of that shit on my phone. It's a phone, has a couple of throwaway games for when I get bored, and can browse the internet in a pinch. If I need to do anything serious it's on a real computer.

  13. Re:Not worth having by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Won't upgrade unless it's forced on me.

    Can they do that now?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  14. Re:Happy Tuesday! by Beau1080p · · Score: 0

    You could at least spam the Anal Vapors story. Look back to around fall '08 FPs.

  15. Hasta La Vista! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game over, man, game over!

    T2 is dead

  16. Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This problem goes way beyond Windows.

    Windows is the most popular OS. It has been like this for a couple of decades now. But for many users it has taken a turn for the worse. So if we don't want to use Windows, we have to look to some other OS.

    This is where the problems really start to pile up: there really aren't any viable OSes aside from Windows.

    macOS is perhaps the obvious choice. But this isn't really an option for somebody who wants to use an existing PC. Yeah, yeah, they could fuck around with building a so-called "Hackintosh" computer, but most people don't want to do that. Besides, if they have to spend more money buying specific hardware, they might as well just get a real Mac of some sort. Again, that's not something they want to do.

    After macOS, Linux is the next most common option. But even today, after so many years, it's nowhere near as user-friendly as Windows or macOS are. In fact, the problem with modern Linux is that it has become distinctly user-unfriendly, even for power users. If we go with the major distro defaults of GNOME 3, systemd and PulseAudio, we'll likely encounter odd problems.

    If we try to rip out systemd, we'll end up with a fragile installation that probably can't be updated properly. If we try to use a niche distro like Slackware, we end up with a painfully inefficient 1990s-era Linux experience. If we try to use a distro like Gentoo, well, it'll be a week before everything is done compiling. We might have some success using a hacked up quasi-distro like Kubuntu or Xubuntu, but we'll likely run into all sorts of bugs and problems due to them not receiving anywhere near as much testing as mainstream Ubuntu releases.

    So Linux really isn't an option for most people.

    The *BSDs are the next best option. At least they avoid the systemd problems of Linux. But they're much more suited to power users. They aren't such a good option for regular users who aren't overly technical.

    If the *BSDs aren't an option, then we're pretty much stuck dealing with an ultra-niche hobbyist OS like Haiku. That's just not a realistic choice.

    At the very bottom of the pile are "operating systems" like Chrome OS or Firefox OS, which probably shouldn't even be considered operating systems. They're just highly restricted Linux systems that essentially only allow a web browser to run. It's all quite dumb.

    So unless you can drop a few thousand dollars on a new Mac of some kind, you'll be using Windows, regardless of what Microsoft chooses to do or not do. There just aren't any viable alternative OSes these days. Windows is the only option.

    1. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This problem goes way beyond Windows.

      Windows is the most popular OS. It has been like this for a couple of decades now. But for many users it has taken a turn for the worse. So if we don't want to use Windows, we have to look to some other OS.

      This is where the problems really start to pile up: there really aren't any viable OSes aside from Windows.

      macOS is perhaps the obvious choice. But this isn't really an option for somebody who wants to use an existing PC. Yeah, yeah, they could fuck around with building a so-called "Hackintosh" computer, but most people don't want to do that. Besides, if they have to spend more money buying specific hardware, they might as well just get a real Mac of some sort. Again, that's not something they want to do.

      After macOS, Linux is the next most common option. But even today, after so many years, it's nowhere near as user-friendly as Windows or macOS are. In fact, the problem with modern Linux is that it has become distinctly user-unfriendly, even for power users. If we go with the major distro defaults of GNOME 3, systemd and PulseAudio, we'll likely encounter odd problems.

      If we try to rip out systemd, we'll end up with a fragile installation that probably can't be updated properly. If we try to use a niche distro like Slackware, we end up with a painfully inefficient 1990s-era Linux experience. If we try to use a distro like Gentoo, well, it'll be a week before everything is done compiling. We might have some success using a hacked up quasi-distro like Kubuntu or Xubuntu, but we'll likely run into all sorts of bugs and problems due to them not receiving anywhere near as much testing as mainstream Ubuntu releases.

      So Linux really isn't an option for most people.

      The *BSDs are the next best option. At least they avoid the systemd problems of Linux. But they're much more suited to power users. They aren't such a good option for regular users who aren't overly technical.

      If the *BSDs aren't an option, then we're pretty much stuck dealing with an ultra-niche hobbyist OS like Haiku. That's just not a realistic choice.

      At the very bottom of the pile are "operating systems" like Chrome OS or Firefox OS, which probably shouldn't even be considered operating systems. They're just highly restricted Linux systems that essentially only allow a web browser to run. It's all quite dumb.

      So unless you can drop a few thousand dollars on a new Mac of some kind, you'll be using Windows, regardless of what Microsoft chooses to do or not do. There just aren't any viable alternative OSes these days. Windows is the only option.

      Wait what!!!
      Mint works like a chaarm. I have it in 3 different laptop/PC.
      Installed it on a 70 old yr old doctors laptop (older non technical person). No handholding needed. He loves it (over 2 years now)
      Mint works. And you can change Host files

    2. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by Holi · · Score: 1

      For most people the OS is not what's important, it's all about the applications. If the software you want to use runs on Windows, you are running Windows.

      If you want to game - Windows
      If you want to use a similar system to what you have at work - Windows
      If you want access to the largest library of usable software - Windows


      If your a hipster or an artist you will probably go for a Mac

      Sorry Linux guys but we nerds are really the only ones who can use it on the desktop.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      If the software you want to use runs on Windows... you can try Wine.

    4. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      This problem goes way beyond Windows.

      Your post is full of so many errors and logical fallacies, I barely have the time to scratch the surface.

      1) Windows is the most popular OS.

      This is nitpicking, but Windows is the most prevalent *desktop* operating system. Linux is the most popular operating system by far, with Android alone recently eclipsing Windows on the user-facing front.

      2) But even today, after so many years, it's nowhere near as user-friendly as Windows or macOS are.

      Everyone for whom I have installed Kubuntu has commented on how unexpectedly easy "Linux" is to use. That's to be expected, since the vast majority of people use their desktops as nothing more than glorified program launchers. That's aside from how much better their computers perform vs. Windows. After using Kubuntu for a while, my customers find Windows to be infuriatingly harsh and difficult to use. They didn't realize just how bad it really is, because that's all they knew. They thought that it was normal for computers to behave so badly, and to be so hard to manage.

      3) If we go with the major distro defaults of GNOME 3, systemd and PulseAudio, we'll likely encounter odd problems.

      GNOME 3 is, in a word, shit. I don't dare put any of my customers or family in front of GNOME, as it's just absolutely terrible. As for the systemd and Pulse Audio hate: I have yet to have a problem with them on any computer I have or service. For 99.999999% of users, Pulse Audio is fantastic. Nobody notices, or cares, about SysV vs. systemd outside of computer forums like Slashdot. For every single one of my users, Kubuntu has been completely care-free. The sole exception was a short period of time where the Open Source AMD driver caused a bunch of bad flickering when desktop effects were turned on.

      4) So Linux really isn't an option for most people.

      My experience indicates the opposite.

    5. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But even today, after so many years, it's [Linux] nowhere near as user-friendly as Windows or macOS are.

      Bullshit.

    6. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      If the software you want to use runs on Windows... you can try Wine.

      And if the opensource/free version of Wine won't run your Windows application, try the commercial/VERY well supported version of Wine, called CrossOverOffice.. It costs $$$ but since your Linux OS was free, why not spend a few bux to avoid the need for Windows. CrossOverOffice even runs MSOffice (older versions I believe) and a LARGE number of Windows games...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    7. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have compatibility problems if you want to run Windows applications. Not as bad as before thanks largely to virtualization, but they're still most definitely there, especially if they need any omph from a GPU or direct access to peripherals.

      Also, most Linux systems are pretty bad for installing any program that isn't in the repository - this is a real problem that frankly nobody is working on even though it's been like this since the early 2000s and probably the 1990s.

      The "Mint works for my 7x/8x/9x year old relative, what's the problem?" bit is fine, but it very rapidly fails if you have someone who uses much more than a web browser and a standard office suite. I'm no fan of Windows, but most Linux distros have some serious problems for average users who want the computer to just work. Windows is the "choice" that's been dumped in their lap.

    8. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Nobody notices, or cares, about SysV vs. systemd outside of computer forums like Slashdot.

      Indeed - it's a server issue since systemd has a desktop focus.
      Pulseaudio was crap for years (which is why it keeps coming up as an example) but then a new bunch of developers took it over.

    9. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by bigmadwolf · · Score: 1

      I've used Linux as my primary OS for real work since the early 2000s. Sure, it takes a little effort to get it working how you like bu then once that's done you leave it alone. If you stick to LTS type distributions you only need to stuff around with them every few years. I don't see what's so different with that to panel beating the likes of Windows 10 into a usable state (turn off all the phone home crap, remove the start menu's built in adverts etc.)

    10. Re:Do we have any choice about OSes to use? by Holi · · Score: 1

      Until is doesn't. Why add another layer of possible problems? If you need to run Windows software, use Windows. Crossover: Out of almost 15k games only 2,549 score gold, and Not gold games tend to break at somepoint, so while 2,549 may seem like a lot, a lot of those are much older and not very popular, Wine is a solution if you already run linux, it is not a solution for the general masses.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  17. Vista support ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... ended the day it was born.

    Not as bad as ME, but a fucking bitch for the workplace.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Vista support ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran ME on 3 computers back in the day with no real problems. In fact, I found it far more reliable than 98SE which had an occasional tenancy to boot with drivers that had mysterious gone missing. However, it's worth noting that on each install I manually disabled some extra features like System Restore.

  18. Re: Happy Tuesday! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scrottie mcboogers?

  19. Re: Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a program like little snitch. Little snitch is for Mac but they should have a tool that's the same for windows. That's the easy way. The harder way is setting up your own hardware firewall and proxy server. That's the best bet tho.

  20. Switch from Windows 10 to what on a subnotebook? by tepples · · Score: 1

    stand up, have a spine. don't use windows 10.

    What is there other than Windows 10, macOS, and Chrome OS? Laptops warranted to run an operating system other than these three aren't shown in showrooms near me. Chromebooks with Crouton have a habit of begging to be wiped (search for "OS verification is OFF"), and System76 currently doesn't offer any laptops smaller than 14 inches. Does Apple deserve a monopoly on compact laptops that run something other than a web browser?

  21. Vista was good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the future. I was hyped for years with Longhorn with the Aero Interface. It inspired Linux to invent compiz and Wayland. Windows 7 gets all the credit for Vista's work. I still have my boxed copy of Vista Ultimate. Windows Vista is way better than Windows 10 even today, with disableable updates and less telemetry.

  22. The Creators update BSODs during installation by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

    I tried installing a few times over the weekend and get a BSOD during the update process on a pretty modern PC I use for gaming. Getting the Anniversary update working well from a clean install was a painful as well. Pre-anniversary Win 10 worked fine on that PC, so it isn't a hardware issue. Microsoft needs to get their hands dirty and fix the core issues with the OS. Getting Gears of War 4 to install ridiculously difficult, too 5 or so tries to finally get it installed without resetting the download. I'm waiting for an update to nuke the install and download the around 100GB game again...

    Needless to say I have selected the "Defer feature updates" checkbox on my work PC, wait for a few patches to smooth out the updating issues.

    1. Re:The Creators update BSODs during installation by LoneBoco · · Score: 1

      Do you have an NVIDIA GPU on the 381.65 drivers? NVIDIA's latest Creators Update drivers can cause BSOD issues, especially with laptops. On my laptop, installing the drivers and rebooting causes Windows to never make it to the login screen. I have to system restore back to an earlier version.

      I would try rolling back drivers first before attempting to upgrade.

    2. Re:The Creators update BSODs during installation by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the feedback. I have an RX480 actually and haven't checked what version of drivers I'm running (should be pretty recent), maybe there is an issue with it too. I also have some VPN software installed for connecting to the office, was thinking of uninstalling it and trying again.

      One of my BSOD errors was "WHEA UNCORRECTABLE ERROR", which according to Microsoft is hardware related. Unfortunately their "solution" for this error is do a windows update or rollback to a previous version of Windows. Thanks guys, so helpful...

    3. Re:The Creators update BSODs during installation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried updating an eight year old system with the NVIDIA drivers. The result was that the machine made the warm reboot normally, but stuck at OS loading stage after a return from S5. Of course, problems are expected now as the update will probably become available automatically for such an old system only after a month or two.

  23. Re: Switch from Windows 10 to what on a subnoteboo by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    It may be recursive... but if you're not qualified to slap a copy of Mint on some generic hardware, you're not qualified to even ask that question.

    Don't let the door hit your fat ass (a statistically likely assumption) on your way out.

  24. Still required to use insecure admin account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many security issues in Windows can be mitigated by just using a plain user account without admin rights, but the problem is that many aspects of maintaining your system requires admin rights.

    * Some software requires admin rights to install, if you run the software and then authorize with an admin account, the software will not install for your user account, but for your admin account.
    * Some of Microsoft's own software, f.ex. the help viewer inside Visual Studio, will fail during installation of new material if you're a user, authorizing as admin.
    * Many important settings will not be available in the UI to you as a user. Again, you're required to be admin to see them.

    Currently, it seems that when you authorize as admin, you're actually switching to the admin account before proceeding, which is why everything fails in true Microsoft style.

    Authorizing shouldn't switch accounts, it should temporarily raise the rights of the user account, but until Microsoft manages to figure this out, and fix it without breaking everything else, Windows will remain broken and insecure by forcing most "non-grandma" users to run as admin.

  25. Just installed it by Espectr0 · · Score: 2

    So far, doing good. I installed by mounting the iso and just upgrading.

    Some notable changes:

    1. win+x doesn't show control panel or command prompt anymore
    2. regedit shows full address of current key on top. Nice for copy and pasting
    3. Revamped installer. Allows you to disable some of the ads
    4. Speaking of ads, there are lots more to disable this time around. There's a helpful article over at howtogeek that explains how to do so
    5. You can actually uninstall onedrive now at it is listed under programs and features, no need to use the command line
    6. More windows update options are available
    7. Edge has some more features, and right now it's the better choice for Netflix (at least when using a browser)
  26. Um yes you will by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    You won't be upgrading, huh? Isn't it an unstoppable mandatory update?

    1. Re:Um yes you will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there is no mandatory updates if you turn off and disable Windows Update and Background Intelligent Transfer Service.
      This can be done in 15 minutes in any version of Windows, and you will learn that YOU DO NOT NEED ANY WINDOWS UPDATES, NOT EVEN SECURITY-RELATED updates for ever.

      Your PC will be quite fast, and will continue to work consistently as long as you have that trash disabled.

  27. Now creatively MORE invasive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With more Spying!

  28. Old Vista laptop or PC to ZFS HOWTO by Wolfrider · · Score: 3

    https://freedompenguin.com/art...

    --If you have an old Vista rig that has a 64-bit CPU, at least 1-2GB RAM and would like to make it more useful... Turn it into a ZFS+Samba file server

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    1. Re:Old Vista laptop or PC to ZFS HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1-2 GB RAM is woefully inadequate for a box running ZFS. Do some research.

    2. Re:Old Vista laptop or PC to ZFS HOWTO by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to use a tiny and slow laptop drive for ZFS storage?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:Old Vista laptop or PC to ZFS HOWTO by dbIII · · Score: 1

      1-2 GB RAM is woefully inadequate for a box running ZFS. Do some research.

      It still runs, it just can't cache as much - do something practical instead of whining about "research".

      I've got a 32bit machine with 2GB of memory and 24 IDE disks to use as a test box to teach people about ZFS. It's as quick as it ever was with hardware RAID. It's nice to have something like that so people can see for themselves how to get back from fairly nasty failures and at what point you can't get back.

  29. Re:Not worth having by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Won't upgrade unless it's forced on me.

    Can they do that now?

    Not sure if asking a rhetorical question, or truly doesn't know...

  30. Re:Switch from Windows 10 to what on a subnotebook by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Posting from a Dell XPS 13 (a chassis smaller than most 13" machines because of their tiny-bezel screens) that's run Lubuntu flawlessly since the day I got it.

  31. Re:Not worth having by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Which is why the ONLY Windows 10 install I run is a Virtualbox VM with the Linux host running a firewall that blocks ALL the MS sites. If/when *I* decide to update the VM, the firewall on the Linux host is temporarily stopped, then restarted afterwards.. Just had to say it.. FUCK YOU MS!!

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  32. Re:Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It blocks some of the holes Eastern European hackers have used to penetrate into your slutty systems with Windows 10 Anniversary Edition and before.

  33. Re: Switch from Windows 10 to what on a subnoteboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there's the douchy neckbeard attitude that ensures that Linux will never be a mainstream success.

  34. Re:Happy Tuesday! by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    BUTTERS?!?! YOU'RE GROUNDED!

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  35. Typo in summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incidentally, today is also the day Windows Vista, a decade-old OS as well as some parts of Office 2007 hit end of life.

    There's a letter missing. Here's how it SHOULD read:

    Incidentally, today is also the day Windows Vista, a decade-old POS as well as some parts of Office 2007 hit end of life.

    FTFY.

  36. Re: Switch from Windows 10 to what on a subnoteboo by tepples · · Score: 1

    but if you're not qualified to slap a copy of Mint on some generic hardware

    Last I checked, Debian and its downstream projects, such as Ubuntu and Mint, have historically had serious problems running on Bay Trail kit, with Bluetooth, audio, camera wireless, suspend, and more broken or missing. It's improved over several years, but a lot is still broken on a T100TA.

  37. Will someone make a new service pack? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Service pack 4 for Windows XP was a big hit. I hope someone provides all the available updates for Vista, too.

    1. Re:Will someone make a new service pack? by Jetstream · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm mistaken, there were only 3 XP service packs?

    2. Re:Will someone make a new service pack? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Someone else took all the released patches after Service Pack 3 and created an unofficial service pack 4 for XP. I was wondering if someone planned on doing the same thing for Vista.

    3. Re:Will someone make a new service pack? by Jetstream · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Do you know if this just a collection of all the security updates up to that time, or did it add additional functionality? Or maybe I should just Google it. ;)

  38. -0.1:9=Â by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    St Nickta Fukovski. .. anon cÂ

  39. Re: Switch from Windows 10 to what on a subnoteboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Installing on isn't something that one should expect to be a walk in the park. Never tried it, but as I understand it trying to install macOS on a random windows laptop would be an even bigger pain in the ass.

  40. Re:Not worth having by espenskaufel · · Score: 1

    It seems you are waging a war that nobody will notices. Why do you think anyone at Microsoft would care if you firewall off the updates? It will just make your network less secure. Why do you even have Windows 10 if you dislike it so much?

  41. Re: Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't change hosts file, they just broke a bunch of stuff (raid management, VM management, etc).
    Unless you didn't mean that you can't change hosts file, just that you can't bypass Microsoft servers.
    Two very different things.

  42. Re: Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is a retired admin. I'm surprised he didn't bring it up again for the millionth time.
    He makes such a big deal of Windows 10 spying, that I get the impression he's a Sandusky type.

  43. Re:Not worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will it make his network less secure? You don't seem to understand either the concept of network security or virtual machines.

    You know what will make your network less secure, guaranteed? Running Windows 10 on bare metal. It has been proven time and again to contain massive amounts of malware, spyware, adware and strips the user of control over fundamental security settings.