Slashdot Mirror


Sorry America, Your Taxes Aren't High (bloomberg.com)

Americans generally feel they're being over-taxed, especially around this time of the year. But is that really true? An article on Bloomberg investigates: The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development analyzed how 35 countries tax wage-earners, making it possible to compare tax burdens across the world's biggest economies. Each year, the OECD measures what it calls the "tax wedge," the gap between what a worker gets paid and what they actually spend or save. Included are income taxes, payroll taxes, and any tax credits or rebates that supplement worker income. Excluded are the countless other ways that governments levy taxes, such as sales and value-added taxes, property taxes, and taxes on investment income and gains. Guess who came out at the top of the list? No. Not the U.S. At the top are Belgium and France, while workers in Chile and New Zealand are taxed the least. America is in the bottom third.

19 of 903 comments (clear)

  1. Taxes are for dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Smart people like Trump never pay them.

    1. Re:Taxes are for dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can simplify the tax code without pulling out this "fair tax" / flat tax bullshit.

      Progressive income taxes work, and they can exist simply, in a manner that doesn't require lawyers and accountants - but guess who writes the tax law?

      Get rid of deductions, stop treating different types of income differently, stop issuing financial aid through tax credits and subsidies (most of which just end up in the pocket of H&R block anyway)... Simple and still progressive to insure the people who can afford to pay more do pay more.

    2. Re:Taxes are for dummies by magarity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They already have a skin in the game, through sales tax, gas tax, etc

      Notice that this study did not take into account all the hidden taxes. Also include the corporate income taxes that are baked into the prices of goods. Making Walmart pay corporate income tax makes a great political sound bite until you realize all the low income people shopping there paid it.

    3. Re:Taxes are for dummies by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But as a percent of income the rich buy less, thus paying less taxes. That's why sales taxes are considered regressive, hitting the poor and middle class more.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    4. Re:Taxes are for dummies by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nobody with a paycheck pays 0%. Anyone that says that willfully disregards Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid taxes which are NOT exempted under any circumstance. Anyone making a paycheck is paying at a minimum the 15% social security and Medicare taxes. The lovely dishonesty about your claim is it's kinda true if you specifically narrow the count to a specific tax, 40% pay no federal income tax in addition to the SS and Medicare/Medicaid taxes.

      You and Romney should get together and have lunch because you're being as dishonest as him in claiming 40% don't pay taxes, everyone earning a wage pays taxes including illegal imigrants who often pay social security and Medicare taxes but will never benefit from them.

    5. Re:Taxes are for dummies by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the most important bit is that the 47% paying no Federal Income taxes (a single tax) are in fact paying far higher percentages of their earnings in the remaining taxes than the richest people pay. No one is exempt from the 15% SS/Medicare/Medicaid taxes, everyone pays state income/sales taxes, property taxes, gas taxes, etc. The tax burden of the average person in Romney's "47%" is more than 50% of their income (the true working poor can have tax rates as high as 60-70% if they live in a state that taxes food) while people like Romney are paying 0-15% taxes if they pay any at all.

      That level of dishonesty is infuriating because it's deliberately obscuring the truth with a lie by omission. The working poor aren't lazy people not paying taxes, they pay higher percentages of taxes than just about anyone else.

    6. Re:Taxes are for dummies by chipschap · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the study REALLY missed is what you get in return for your taxes.

      For instance, Scandanavian taxes are not exactly low, but there is quite a lot of service provided.

      I'd put forth the proposition that on a value basis, U.S. taxes are high.

    7. Re:Taxes are for dummies by Pfhorrest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fun fact: if you add a universal basic income to a flat income tax, the net result is a progressive tax that automatically sets its brackets based on the level of income disparity.

      Get rid of deductions, stop treating different types of income differently, tax everyone's everything the same percent, then give everyone the same lump sum as a tax credit, and pay anything they end up getting back in monthly installments (likewise allowing people to pay anything they owe monthly), and you've got a clean, simple system that puts a gentle pressure toward the mean income on everyone's incomes... or less gentle as the greater income disparity becomes.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  2. So you exclude half the taxes and what you get? by clifwlkr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think anyone thinks that America's income taxes straight out are that high. But now add in property taxes, which are very significant, social security, etc. That really starts to cover the effective tax rate that you really pay. Then also all the government 'fees' and requirements you pay (required backflow valve inspections at your cost, etc.). Finally, consider what you actually get for it, as we don't get government pensions or healthcare or any kinds of real social service for this money.

    So basically they really aren't counting the total real taxes paid, and aren't considering the value of those taxes. Not sure how really useful this comparison is at the end of the day.....

    1. Re:So you exclude half the taxes and what you get? by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By the time you take all that stuff into account the US is likely to be *way* further down the list. Property tax isn't high in the US (typically around 1.5% of the value of the property, which is similar to, or lower than council tax rates in the UK). Sales tax is typically extremely low (typically less than 6%), compared to the UK's 20% VAT. Taxes on fuel are typically extremely low 18.4/gal, compared to the UK's £2.19/gal (273/gal).

    2. Re:So you exclude half the taxes and what you get? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I will assert that the taxes to the -government- are not high in the US. However, there are "taxes", that one has fork over to businesses or else:

      1: Health insurance.
      2: Toll roads/commuting. There is no government interest in public transportation, so one has to have a vehicle and drive. This means forking over cash for car insurance, vehicle upkeep, parking, traffic costs, etc.
      3: Pollution.
      4: Potential losses due to sickness/injury. Those costs going to inscos don't mean that they might bother paying a hospital bill bursting with zeros. It is pretty common for someone to lose their entire fortune with one serious illness.
      5: Unemployment. Not everyone has a 2 year "fuck you" fund. Benefits can be quite limited, if one can get them at all, since ex-employers fight unemployment claims tooth-and-nail as a matter of routine.
      6: Training and education. When I was in college, my German classmate had his tuition paid for by the state. Same with my Russian, Chinese, French, English, and Indian classmates. I was the only one there forking out fees out of my pocket or getting student loans for it.

      I would be more than happy to pay more in taxes, provided it gave single-payer health coverage, a usable public transportation system, some type of income if jobless for the short and long term, and education so I can keep relevant when job skills shift. In fact, if those things were covered by taxes, I'd be far better off financially, and I'm sure most people would be as well.

    3. Re:So you exclude half the taxes and what you get? by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sales tax is often above 6%, even here in Utah. There are state, county and city components to it. The federal gas tax is the low part. State more than doubles that. We pay an additional 29 cents a gallon on that. Given the cost of gas that is an effective 25%ish tax rate. Social security tax is very significant amount, varying by income. Then again remember the second half of the equation. We are required to by health insurance and nothing is covered. We have to pay out of pocket on top of that to use the health insurance. We have to save for our own retirement as we do not get government pensions back out of our money, and in fact can't even really start collecting social security (our own money) until later and later years. Now approaching the average age that a male dies. We basically get very little for our tax money, and have to make up that difference ourselves, costing us more. This means that the real effective tax rate is higher, and actual cost of living can be quite high do to the lack of services provided for your taxes. The corporations get cheap tax rates, the extremely rich pay very little, and the middle class carries a significant portion of the tax burden. Look at the effective rate the middle class pays and what they get.

      I live in a European country. I pay 25% sales tax, a 40% income tax and a monthly charge for my pension plan but that's not a tax to my mind, it's an investment. Additionally I pay tons of all kinds of fees every time I want to use a public service, my car is subject to fuel taxes and road taxes but I expect this 'taxing by a thousand tiny cuts' phenomenon also exists in the states so let's stick with the big taxes. If I was an American I'd be paying 25% income tax and 0-10% sales tax depending on where I lived. On the face of it I'd say the American has it significantly better than I do especially because the average pay in my industry is about 30% higher in the US. However, I do get universal healthcare and free university education for my 40% income tax and 25% sales tax and the crime rate is ridiculously low here compared to the US so it's not all bad.

  3. Health Care by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since health insurance is required by the government it is a tax, even if you don't want to call it that.

    Why is that figure omitted from the comparison?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Let's have an apples to aplpes comparison by Blue23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For example, if a country's taxes include universal health care, then the equivalent cost to Americans would be taxes + healthcare costs, not just taxes. Same in regards to things like universal access to education (including college), or a better social support net for elders past working age.

    Comparing buckets that are supposed to cover differing things and noticing they are differing sizes really doesn't show anything at all. It's a false equivalency that's misleading at best.

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  5. Because they cherry pick the numbers... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forgot to ad the forced insurance payments that are in fact taxes. $900 a month for both my wife and I. I pay more in taxes+the forced insurance payment than the canadians do and they dont have to pay co-pays and their pharmaceuticals are not allowed to be price gouged.

    So add that in and now you have the REAL number to compare, because those countries all have universal healthcare for their citizens.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Re:Yeah, well... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You get the biggest, best-equipped military in the world. One (admittedly large by area and population) nation, effectively dominating a large portion of the planet and strongly influencing the rest. If you take off the gloves, you could take on the entire world and win.

    You've done that at the expense of healthcare, education, and social programs. It's a choice you make every election cycle.

  7. Deception - just one kind of tax. by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem isn't that just one tax - the payroll/income tax being high.

    It's that after you pay that you still have to pay social-security (which isn't operating in the way it commissioned to operate), the medicare, state income tax (in most states), health insurance - which in now a tax per the supreme court, car inspection, vehicle registration, property tax, sales tax at the register, "universal service fee", among other things that creep in we are much more highly taxed than we get credit for when you're only looking at payroll/income.

    For a couple of years I was at 53% removed from my paycheck before I got paid, THEN the sales tax etc.... happened.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  8. Canada vs US by sjbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was surprised to find that Canada pays less than the US overall.

    You shouldn't be. Canada is rather more sanely managed than much of the US.

    And for that Canada has a rudimentary universal health care system, and the US has what?

    The US has a schizophrenic public/private system where nobody is in a position to control costs. We have universal health care but only for retired and some (but not all) poor people. We have great hospitals but nobody to keep costs in check. We refuse to insure millions of people thereby costing ourselves far more money when they inevitably show up in the emergency department of a hospital to get treated at far higher cost. We allow drug companies to charge whatever they want because... reasons. If you wanted to design a financially irresponsible health care system you'd have a hard time developing one more irresponsible than the one the US has.

    Crumbling infrastructure and an overpriced military that funnels money into the military's suppliers and from there to the executives of those suppliers.

    Our military isn't so much over priced as over funded. We have WAY more military than we could possibly justify or need. We spend more on our military than then next 8 largest military budgets combined, most of whom are allies. We have an annual federal deficit of $600 billion and guess how much we spent on our military last year? Yep, $600 billion. We basically borrow every penny we spend on the military, thereby screwing future generations because baby boomers are paranoid idiots.

  9. Re:I demand More Tax by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The rich can leave, or at least move their wealth to somewhere the government can't reach.

    Some do, most don't because they value a safe western society where property rights are respected and the second there is conflict or a threat the ones that did leave come running right back to the US. Personally I'd like to see stricter rules on this, you take your money and leave to avoid taxes and the government isn't responsible to repatriot you when the inevitable conflict brings them running back.

    You want the benefits of living in a protected western economy you should have to pay the taxes to support that.