Slashdot Mirror


FriendELEC Releases $40 NanoPi K2 Board That Competes With ODROID-C2, Raspberry Pi 3 (cnx-software.com)

DeathByLlama writes: The single board computer market, broken wide-open just a few years ago by the Raspberry Pi Foundation, continues to flourish today as FriendELEC releases their $40 NanoPi K2 board. This SBC packs a 1.5 GHz 64-bit quad core Amlogic S905 processor, and paired with 2GB of DDR3 RAM and the Mali-450MP GPU, it is able to stream 4K at 60 FPS. Add in gigabit ethernet, onboard Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, IR (and a remote!), eMMC compatibility, a familiar GPIO header, and a $40 price tag, and you end up with some stiff competition for other market leaders like Hardkernel's ODROID-C2 and Raspberry Pi's flagship Pi 3. The release is clearly in early phases with Ubuntu images and house-sold eMMC modules still on their way. It's amazing to see such strong competition in this market -- and with so many sub-$100, incredibly capable SBC options, which will choose?

80 comments

  1. Just an Android Box? by randomErr · · Score: 2

    I've recent purchased a couple of Android TV box for usage as digital signage. They had the the same specs with the same price. But they came with a case and power supply. Why doesn't some Chinese manufacture make a vanilla Android box that is hacker friendly? Let us easily the OS as we see fit.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Just an Android Box? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      How much would it cost to have one 3D printed to your specifications?

    2. Re:Just an Android Box? by randomErr · · Score: 1

      $20-30 at local fab-lab plus my design time. So now we're talking $70 + power supply.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  2. Edit harder! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Is it FriendELEC, or FriendlyELEC? You owe it to the manufacturer to, for God's sake, AT LEAST GET THEIR NAME RIGHT!

    1. Re:Edit harder! by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Typical case of copying from an article somebody else wrote, like this one.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    2. Re:Edit harder! by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Then this article at least got the title right, but makes the same error in the first sentence already.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  3. Next step by somenickname · · Score: 1

    These little ARM boards are great but, I'd love to see some super cheap ARM/FPGA boards become available. Something like a Zybo but in the $50 price range with just enough FPGA fabric to offload tasks that the CPU is abysmal at. The RPI brought embedded computing to the masses and it's been great but, a $50 ARM board with an FPGA could bring some flavor of High Level Synthesis (and AXI) to the masses. That's whole new level of nerdiness and enables a proper next generation type of hobby embedded stuff.

    1. Re:Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These little ARM boards are great but, I'd love to see some super cheap ARM/FPGA boards become available. Something like a Zybo but in the $50 price range with just enough FPGA fabric to offload tasks that the CPU is abysmal at. The RPI brought embedded computing to the masses and it's been great but, a $50 ARM board with an FPGA could bring some flavor of High Level Synthesis (and AXI) to the masses. That's whole new level of nerdiness and enables a proper next generation type of hobby embedded stuff.

      It's called a ZynqBerry.. ;)

    2. Re:Next step by somenickname · · Score: 1

      I've seen the ZynqBerry and it's the right idea but, it's still too expensive and not quite what I'm thinking. I'd like to see a 99% open source ARM/FPGA board appear and have an entire ecosystem develop around it such that it makes Vivado look like a clunky dinosaur.

  4. Meh by c · · Score: 1

    A Pi clone is just a cheaper Pi. Nothing we really haven't seen before.

    Now, FriendlyElec's Neo series is a bit more interesting... 40mm x 40mm, no GPU... sort of a riff on the Pi Zero, but not a slavish clone and with more port options (ethernet/full-USB on one, WiFi/camera on another, etc). I've got a couple of them running around the house in places a Pi would be overkill, but a Pi Zero would require extra components.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
    1. Re:Meh by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      But it has Mali. That's a big fail unless you want to use it as a little server, for which you'd want SATA or USB3. Which it doesn't have.

    2. Re:Meh by c · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I/O isn't blazing, but the Neo's are quite adequate for the workloads I use it for (some of which I've migrated from wifi routers using optware+USB keys, so the bar is quite low). OctoPrint works decently. YMMV, of course, but that's why it's nice to have a broad ecosystem of Pi-like devices rather than just a bunch of pin-for-pin clones.

      I wouldn't use the FriendlyElec products for something like a media server; get a proper Pi for that stuff.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  5. Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the Odroid boards and the Pi 3 don't have it yet, but the Pi Zero non-wifi version has been eliminated in favor of the Zero W which has wifi.

    Anyway this board just seems like a me-too. See also the Odroids, Rpi, Orange Pi, etc.

    1. Re:Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Coz big guv wants to know what you're doing?
      Why don't you just disable wifi in the settings.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    2. Re:Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why don't you just disable wifi in the settings.

      Why would I expect disabling wifi in the settings to actually disable wifi, if I think of wifi as an attack vector to begin with? That's like disabling the webcam in the settings of your laptop. Most people put electrical tape over the camera instead, because who knows what the settings actually do. It's the same thing with wifi.

    3. Re:Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      How can you ever trust that it's really disabled?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have a "WiFi Attack Vector" ... A phrase you clearly choose to sound like you are a security expert. Of course if you were, you'd know how to blacklist the driver if you didn't want the "Attack Vector".

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Somebody should create some kind of OS where you have all the source code!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      This is hilarious actually. Every anti Linux person spouts the myth that WiFi never works. Now we are hearing people worry that it will spontaneously work even without a driver loaded. So precious.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    7. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, can you reply to this comment thread a couple of more times? Do that before taking your autism pills please - it's funnier that way.

    8. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Why would WiFi need a *Linux* driver loaded to work? You can always arrange for it to work (in itself) regardless of the OS. In fact, it you're manufacturing "spyable" hardware, you practically have to. What if you want it to work even when the machine appears to be turned off, for example?

      That still doesn't mean it will work for *you*, anyway. ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Soldering iron?

    10. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you umm.. you think when people say "disable wifi" that means not loading a driver into the kernel? i just read over some of your previous gold. not knowing common expressions and phrases society uses seems to be a thing with you. so - foreign or really ugly?

  6. I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    And more memory. 2Gig ain't what it used to be. (I had 16Meg in my 386SX rig back in the day.)
    Waiting for my ExpressoBINs to arrive.

    1. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      (I had 16Meg in my 386SX rig back in the day.)

      Ee, when I were a lad I 'ad 32K and I were grateful for it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wow, you had the expensive memory upgrade hey?

    3. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      32K? Christ, your generation was spoiled.

      I still have my old ZX81 with the 16K RAM pack. You have to put ice cubes in Ziploc bags and rest them on the plastic above the heat sink, or else thermal expansion makes the edge connector lose contact with the board. Of course you can always go old school and just use the onboard RAM chip with 1024 bytes.

      Of course by 2050 we'll be cracking up at the thought of a Raspberry Pi- another British computer.

    4. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by Trongy · · Score: 1

      The reason these boards are cheap is that they are using surplus SOCs designed for smart TVs and set top boxes. A board that had SATA or PCIe support would cost much more than $5 extra.

    5. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      (I had 16Meg in my 386SX rig back in the day.)

      Ee, when I were a lad I 'ad 32K and I were grateful for it.

      Well, I was referring to my 386SX rig, not the first Apple ][ I had access to.

    6. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      The reason these boards are cheap is that they are using surplus SOCs designed for smart TVs and set top boxes. A board that had SATA or PCIe support would cost much more than $5 extra.

      Whatever. $5 more, $10 more. My point is that these SOCs are cute, but not worth wasting my time on.

    7. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd happily pay $50 for 2 SATA ports. Then it becomes a low power NAS.

    8. Re:I'd happily pay $5 more for a SATA port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 seconds in Google:

      http://linuxgizmos.com/latest-banana-pi-offers-sata-and-2gb-ram/

  7. Figures. by eriks · · Score: 1

    Of course they did, because I just got my RPI3 yesterday, and I had been hemming and hawing for months about what device to get for an HTPC. Decided on PI3 for software and community support, so while this one looks real nice spec-wise, I might still have gone with the PI had I seen this one first. My initial impressions of the RPI3 is that it's surprisingly responsive for such a modest machine. It'd probably be usable as a primary desktop for most non-gamers. I've only played with it for a short time, but it's pretty neat for $35, and LibreELEC seems quite snappy, and was installed within minutes of powering up the board.

    1. Re:Figures. by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I actually used a Pi3 as a desktop for a few weeks when I managed to hose my main desktop. It was a little like the early 1990s but OK.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    2. Re:Figures. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, as long as you don't go nuts with the desktop stuff, it deals quite nicely with the everyday stuff. I put FVWM on mine and called it a day.

      The biggest problem I've found is that you can't, or I can't at least, really mount the entire file system over NFS. If you run it from the microsd-card, it works just fine, but if you go root over NFS it randomly starts freezing and hanging, which is pretty annoying. I think the problem is the USB controller overheating - thanks to the real Achilles heel of the RPI, networking over USB - but I haven't had the time to look into that yet. I know it's not the PSU at least, which is another sore spot you need to watch out for when you start forcing the PI3 to do real work, as it need quite a bit of juice.

  8. how much for a horse whip mount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SATA is old and dead in 2017

    emmc and PCIe are the interfaces of the present

    why not just mount it via NFS over a PPP connection

    1. Re:how much for a horse whip mount by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      SATA is old and dead in 2017

      emmc and PCIe are the interfaces of the present

      why not just mount it via NFS

      NFS on a 100baseT on the USB bus and a slow chipset. yeahrite.

      over a PPP connection

      you're a funny dude. First you tell me that SATA is old and dead in 2017, then suggest using PPP. I haven't used PPP since around 1994 on a 56K modem. Sure, PCIe would be nice, but it's even more expensive than SATA. We're already not getting SATA, so I'd wager getting PCIe is even further behind.

    2. Re:how much for a horse whip mount by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

      on SATA - I believe that the majority of the external USB spinning rust consists of a generic SATA drive coupled thru a SATA-to-USB interace.
      What I'd really like to see is one of these SBC's with a generic SATA connection along with a set of USB ports so that I could have a chance of recovering the data from old external USB drives.
      Someone is going to make a small fortune designing and configuring one of the SBC's for this specific application . . .

      Break open the 'dead' external USB drive box, connect the appropriate cable to your SBC, plug in to the USB port for your desktop link, and BINGO - the dead drive can now be copied out to another storage location.

      MANY of the external USB failures are because the interface has failed, and replacing that with a generic SBC link, plus appropriate power to the drive and platter, will allow you to recover most, if not all, of the data from the 'dead' external USB drive.

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, you could always cannibalize a working USB drive for its interface, but that means taking down a working drive on the off-chance that the interface is compatible - not the best solution.

      AND there is the issue of compatibility between various interface cards - - - but that is the purpose of using a SBC for the interface - configurable software packages for each type of SATA-to-USB configuration.

      cheers . . .

      --
      redneck geek
    3. Re: how much for a horse whip mount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh

  9. Specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The specs of this new NanoPi are closer to the specs of the Odroid than to those of the RPi. NanoPi and Odroid have Gigabit Ethernet (and NanoPi has wireless on top of that), the RPi only has 10/100 Ethernet (internally connected to the USB interface) and wireless.

    Raspberry Pi Specs:

    SoC: Broadcom BCM2837
    CPU: 4× ARM Cortex-A53, 1.2GHz
    GPU: Broadcom VideoCore IV
    RAM: 1GB LPDDR2 (900 MHz)
    Networking: 10/100 Ethernet, 2.4GHz 802.11n wireless
    Bluetooth: Bluetooth 4.1 Classic, Bluetooth Low Energy
    Storage: microSD
    GPIO: 40-pin header, populated
    Ports: HDMI, 3.5mm analogue audio-video jack, 4× USB 2.0, Ethernet, Camera Serial Interface (CSI), Display Serial Interface (DSI)

    Odroid C2 Specs:

    * Amlogic ARM® Cortex®-A53(ARMv8) 1.5Ghz quad core CPUs
    * Mali-450 GPU (3 Pixel-processors + 2 Vertex shader processors)
    * 2Gbyte DDR3 SDRAM
    * Gigabit Ethernet
    * HDMI 2.0 4K/60Hz display
    * H.265 4K/60FPS and H.264 4K/30FPS capable VPU
    * 40pin GPIOs + 7pin I2S
    * eMMC5.0 HS400 Flash Storage slot / UHS-1 SDR50 MicroSD Card slot
    * USB 2.0 Host x 4, USB OTG x 1 (power + data capable)
    * Infrared(IR) Receiver
    * Ubuntu 16.04 or Android 5.1 Lollipop based on Kernel 3.14LTS

    FriendELEC NanoPi:

    SoC – Amlogic S905 quad core cortex-A53 processor @ 1.5 GHz with penta core Mali-450MP GPU
            System Memory – 2GB DDR3
            Storage – eMMC module socket, micro SD slot
            Video Output – HDMI 2.0 up to 4K @ 60 Hz
            Connectivity – Gigabit Ethernet (Realtek RTL8211F), 802.11 b/g/n WiFi + Bluetooth 4.0 (AP6212 module) with chip antenna + IPX connector
            USB – 4x USB 2.0 host ports (GL825G USB hub) + micro USB OTG port for power and adata
            Expansion Header
                    40-pin header with GPIO, I2C, UART, ADC, PWM, SPDIF, and CVBS
                    7-pin I2S interface
            Debugging – 4-pin Serial console port (3.3V)
            Misc – Status & power LEDs, IR receiver, power key (populated)
            Power Supply – 5V/2A DC input via 4.0×1.7mm power barrel, or micro USB port
            Dimensions – 85 x 56mm

    1. Re:Specs by slashrio · · Score: 0

      It's FriendlyElec...!

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  10. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody knows what the fuck this article is about.

    1. Re:What? by slashrio · · Score: 1

      At least it's something that keeps you off the street.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    2. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reading this while on the street, you insensitive clod!

  11. which will choose? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Hey BeauHD. Nice to see that you're still not bothered by the complex editing job of seeing that what you post actually makes sense.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:which will choose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been trying to get Slashdot to choose new editors for years now, but no luck.

  12. Does it have any binary blobs? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    If it can be controlled completely by Free Software then it becomes interesting. If there are any binary blobs -- or worse, blobs that cannot be replaced due to DRM -- then it's utterly worthless.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Does it have any binary blobs? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If it can be controlled completely by Free Software then it becomes interesting. If there are any binary blobs -- or worse, blobs that cannot be replaced due to DRM -- then it's utterly worthless.

      That's a foolish thing to say. Most users have binary blobs, and still manage to get worth out of their devices.

      On the other hand, what it is IMO is completely uninteresting, because we already have multiple options which have binary blobs, like Raspberry Pi or Pine A64+. (Banana Pi is an unreliable POS, or I would have mentioned it.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re: Does it have any binary blobs? by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

      AFAIK you can use it as headless server with free software only right now with a bit of google fu. There is a guy balbes150 (on cnx and armbian etc), who works for a company I've forgotten the name of that is bringing s905 and s905x support to the mainline kernel. He has a presentation of his efforts somwhere on youtube.

    3. Re:Does it have any binary blobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are any binary blobs -- or worse, blobs that cannot be replaced due to DRM -- then it's utterly worthless.

      Well if your definition of "worthless" includes posting to slashdot a rant about how worthless your computer is, you must have a pretty high value assigned to "worthless"

      But yes, this system is just as "worthless" as all other computers on the market for the last 20 years that contain a CPU, since every last one has firmware and blobs in them that you can't control, see, modify, or even fully know what it is doing.

      This board is marketed as a competitor to existing SBCs, it isn't trying to be the worlds first and only system without firmware in it, and it's a bit silly for you or anyone else to expect such.

    4. Re:Does it have any binary blobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worthless to anyone who's even slightly discerning. Worthless to anyone who knows good shit from malware.

      Is that pedantic enough for you?

  13. No x265 support by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    These are surplus s905 chips that nobody wants to use anymore, as they've move on to updated SoCs with x265 support.

    Still, this might be slick to build a MAME tabletop arcade box.

    1. Re:No x265 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about such patent laden money sinks anyway. Why do you care what codec videos use? Video quality is good enough already. It has been good enough since DVDs.

    2. Re:No x265 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For you, maybe. But the rest of us still have functional eyes, so can see the difference between MPEG2 and x265.
      And thats only talking visual quality, the real kicker is the file size reduction.. You could fit several DVDs worth of movies on a single DVD if they used such a great codec aa x264/5.

  14. Why is 4k video important? by caseih · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It amuses me how all these SBCs advertize decoding high definition video. Of all the things I can think of to do with a Pi--robotics, remote sensing, UAVs, etc--decoding video is just not on my radar. Besides that I tried using a Pi once for a XBMC/Kodi box and found the experience to be lacking. 1080p video did play just fine most of the time until something crashed.

    These devices can be used for amazingly cool projects. But I suspect 90% of them end up in the bottoms of drawers. I've got 4 in a drawer myself, waiting for time to use them in some cool project some day. In the meantime another more powerful one comes along.

    Can anyone tell me if this board or any board (BBB maybe?) contains power management, such as suspend and resume, power on or wake on a schedule, etc? For remote sensing that is really what I need.

    1. Re:Why is 4k video important? by tannhaus · · Score: 2

      I've got a raspberry pi3 plugged into an Xbox One TV Tuner running TVHeadend. It records all my tv shows for me onto my Western Digital Mycloud. I can watch them from any phone, tablet or TV in the house. I don't have it cutting out the commercials because it would bog it down so much...

    2. Re:Why is 4k video important? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Besides that I tried using a Pi once for a XBMC/Kodi box and found the experience to be lacking. 1080p video did play just fine most of the time until something crashed.

      You found it lacking and your complaining about companies attempting to improve those problems where it's lacking?
      Crashing? How did you crash a Raspberry pi running Kodi? There's a lot of ways to describe it, but unstable isn't one of them, and while the original RPi was a tad slow on the interface subsequent ones made them almost the perfect media centres.

      So here's a question: Why are they lying in a drawer? Because they were not suitable for your purposes? Why then complain that competition is driving an improvement in the hardware?

      Personally I have 3 in service and 0 in a drawer.

    3. Re:Why is 4k video important? by Striktarn · · Score: 1

      There are so many SBCs out there today. I wish there was at least _one_ that ran fully free software as defined by the FSF but I guess it is not a big deal for people.(https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/single-board-computers)

    4. Re:Why is 4k video important? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      On very rare occasions, in the past, a movie could indeed crash the player on a Pi. Haven't seen this for a year or two, though.

  15. Is there a competitor with vulkan support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking for a competitor with w recent gpu but they all seem to limit to OpenGL ES 2.0

  16. Close but no cigar by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 0

    Making a slightly better Pi for a slightly higher price isn't going to turn heads. The pi just works. There is lots of code and it is a known quantity.

    To beat the Pi there has to be some zing. Some problem that I am having needs to be solved.

    I can think of a few things that would wow me(one or more would be great). Lots of RAM. Really small footprint. Really cheap. Very low energy usage. Really good GPU. The whole thing on a single chip. A zillion cores (even if they are slow). vxWorks Compatible. And what would be great would be a shipper in Canada who didn't charge way over MSRP and tag on a shittonne of shipping charges.

    Basically, for a company to make what is effectively a next generation Pi is just dumb. The next generation Pi is probably around the corner anyway. Things like the Omega2 catch my interest. Super cheap, Low power and car run linux.

    For instance. A ESP32 that could run linux would rock my world. That would basically end my pi buying days.

    1. Re:Close but no cigar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer; Talking from the standpoint of someone not living in the US.

      I think what you need to beat the RPI is first of all availability: I can enter basically any store selling electronic stuff, and buy a RPI. If I want something better, I basically have to mess with international orders and shipping. Huge barrier.

      Secondly: you need to be even better supported, by documentation, in kernel land and by community.

      Thirdly: better hardware with dedicated power supply so we could get off this idiotic power over microUSB-boondoggle, which really causes far more problems than it's worth. Could we please have something like a 12V barrel-connector instead? It's not sexy, but it would improve reliability immensely, and make it a lot more attractive for people actually making things with it. PoE would be really cool, but that would probably be asking for too much.

      Fourthly: For heavens sake, put in a real networking chip. PI's tend to be used quite extensively for networking tasks, this network over USB thingamajig, again, is substandard and causes far more problems than it's worth. It's just cheap and stupid, and - for no real good reason - it puts a serious limiter on what you can use the device for.

      Finally, please at least double the amount of RAM; The same goes for 1GB as for the "networking" via USB; It's just cheap and stupid and - again, for no good reason - it puts a serious limiter on what you can use the device for. /me steps of soapbox.

  17. Trademark infringement by DrXym · · Score: 1

    "It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em"

  18. Hardware great! support sucks by petes_PoV · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The hardware side of all these Pi "clones" is fantastic. They blow past the original Raspberry version all the time. There are varieties that are smaller, cheaper, more powerful, more innovative, more features.

    However their operating systems and general support are awful. What little information is available is usually only made known by amateurs who's interest waxes and wanes, The operating systems are largely undocumented, old, and hit'n'miss as to whether they will work on any particular board - and frequently don't have features like SPI implemented, (Although part of this is due to the system config file and its vagaries.)

    If the hardware manufacturers put half the development skill into the software as they do into the hardware, they would dominate the world and leave the RPi crushed into a stain on the rug. It is only the support, forums, and large amount of "how to" information that keeps the RaspberryPi viable. If the others ever caught up, the RPi would cease to exist.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  19. Hardware is good but ... by dadman · · Score: 0

    most of these me-too boards lack proper support on the software. Most if not all support only the old linux kernel 3.x. The later kernel 4 which the RPi supports gives better security and functionalities. You can't even run docker on most of these me-too hardware no matter how good they are over the RPi. Ok, not everyone want docker, but security itself is already a big question mark. Of course you can always compile your own kernel and make it up-to-date but building your own kernel is not for everyone, and definitely not for most of the Chinese manufacturers that use these boards to power their own devices.

  20. Good old days? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Are we returning to the good old days of computing, where there was more than two or three main platforms? Remember the days of MS-DOS, Mac, Amiga, Atari ST, TRS-80, C64, etc? The more fragmented the world because, the harder it becomes for viruses and all that crap to migrate and grow.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  21. Desktop? by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    How far away is such a device from becoming able to be a good desktop PC from non gamer types of users?

    1. Re:Desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardware wise, these boxes are essentially already there. They have the CPU and RAM to run linux desktop OS. I

  22. Next Thing Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For most little compute jobs around the house (watching for bluetooth, logging door open closes, getting temp readings and light readings and humidity readings, etc.) I think the PI is the wrong target. The Next Thing Chip is a way better model:
    No SD card, so A. no extra expense, B. no weird SD card-based failures.
    Built-in WiFi, which is how most of these little projects connect.
    Works off a battery right out of the box, so that you can keep up through power failures.
    Less than half the idle power draw of the PI (with bluetooth and WiFi active -- significantly lower without).
    Cheap. $9.

    There's less extras you have to buy, and I have excellent uptime on simple setups.

    I would not mind seeing some competitors in this space. The PI Zero doesn't cut it because it needs an SD card and has no networking.

  23. Still no SATA by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    Still waiting for the day when someone finally releases one of these small computers with SATA interfaces so I can make my own NAS.

    1. Re: Still no SATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cubieboard ?

    2. Re:Still no SATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banana pi???

    3. Re:Still no SATA by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      No, its Sata is only one channel (no good for say a 4channel NAS). Also its connected via the USB bus so performance is VERY slow.

    4. Re: Still no SATA by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      You need to purchase a cubietruck then that only gives you a single sata2. I need 4 SATA3s for a 4 bay nas.

    5. Re:Still no SATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.crowdsupply.com/gnubee/personal-cloud-1

      http://espressobin.net/

      I think I remember hearing that the Espresso bin can work with a SATA port multiplier.

    6. Re:Still no SATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odroid XU4 has a NAS kit. sata to usb 3.0...

  24. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly.

    Wifi can't just spontaneously activate. If someone can activate an deactivated wifi connection, then they have already successfully penetrated the environment to a point where they don't need to.

  25. Re: Why do they all have a wifi attack vector now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get it. You are one stood motherfucker. No reason to keep proving it.