Slashdot Mirror


US Navy Bans Vaping On Ships (go.com)

The U.S. Navy announced today that it will no longer allow sailors to use electronic cigarettes on ships, following several reports of explosives and injuries. ABC News reports: Naval commanders said in a statement Friday that the temporary electronic cigarette policy aims to protect sailors and the fleet. It starts next month. Officials cited overheated batteries in vaping equipment as the problem. Explosions have led to fires, first-degree burns and facial disfigurement. During a recent eight-month stretch, 12 incidents put sailors out of work for a combined 77 days. Injuries also restricted some to light duty for a total of five months.

99 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Re: They have damage control parties... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This. They need the practice handling fires and burns so they're missing an opportunity.

  2. They should be "frying" bigger fish... by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The bigger fish they should be frying should be the "crippling construction defects" affecting their newer ships other than focusing on minor issues like vaping in my opinion.

    1. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by lucm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cancer is a bigger health problem than hemorrhoids. Does that mean you want big pharma to stop working on hemorrhoids cream and focus all their energy on cancer?

      Maybe there's room for common sense and picking low-hanging fruit is part of it.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Because if you ain't got a big enough pan, you end up with only a big pile of spoiled inedible fish instead of all of them.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      The bigger fish they should be frying should be the "crippling construction defects"

      I may be going way out on a limb here, but maybe ship construction and health issues are handled by different people.

    4. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by clovis · · Score: 3, Funny

      The bigger fish they should be frying should be the "crippling construction defects"

      I may be going way out on a limb here, but maybe ship construction and health issues are handled by different people.

      I'm pretty sure it's just this guy doing everything:
      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_eosG...

    5. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by beckett · · Score: 1

      The bigger fish they should be frying

      This story is about banning a persistent fire/explosion hazard on a warship housing high explosives. The Navy is addressing a safety issue to prevent frying fish.

    6. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I certainly will not argue against that. When the USS Texas submarine was first built you couldn't test for grounds on the electrical system without causing fires and explosions. They had to put thick plexiglass covers over all the electrical panels to protect the sailors from the explosions. I don't know if they ever fixed the problem or not.

    7. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      He would be a vast improvement.

    8. Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      They need to prevent terrorism-supporting countries getting weapons

      That would be rather hard to do since the US is the primary perpetrator of terrorism in the world, dwarfing everyone else combined. Also, they build all their own weapons.

      Iran has been on the US government's list of places to invade for at least a decade. Not because they support terrorism, but because their leader doesn't bow before them without hesitation.

  3. If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is no military draft right now.

    That means that 100% of the personnel in the Navy are in the Navy because they
    CHOSE to be in the navy.

    If you fuckers in the Navy don't like being told what you cannot do, you shouldn't have enlisted.

    What a bunch of pussies. If you were being shot at, you'd quit whining about vaping damned quick.

    1. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by lucm · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I laugh when I hear twerps like you talking shit you absolutely do not and never will have
      the courage to back up. Go play some video games, you pathetic child.

      Can you explain how being drafted makes you an expert about courage? You didn't enlist, you were forced to go to war. You're like a single mom or a cancer kid; you faced a challenging situation but that situation by itself doesn't grant you courage automatically.

      Maybe the other guy is a twerp, and maybe you are a veteran, but in the context of this thread neither of you has provided any information that would give an edge in your pissing contest.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      One man's arrogant prick is another man's commanding officer. ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Can you explain how being drafted makes you an expert about courage?"

      Well, unlike the assholes who dodged the draft like fucking cowards who didn't want to lose their money and privilege, this person sucked it up and went and kicked some ass and survived.

      So they know more about courage than those draft dodgers, and obviously knows more about courage than you since you lack even the most basic critical thinking capability to have come to such a goddamned simple conclusion.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by lucm · · Score: 1

      and obviously knows more about courage than you since you lack even the most basic critical thinking capability

      Critical thinking is the opposite of that emotional outburst you're making.

      When you say that people who didn't run from the draft showed courage, you're insulting people who volunteered.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by Xenx · · Score: 1

      That is complete bull. Attributing courage to one group doesn't inherently diminish another. If it was explicitly stated that the people that were drafted were just as courageous as volunteers, then you would have a starting point. Further, it doesn't always take courage to enlist. Lack of perceived options also factors into it. Also, having courage to enlist doesn't mean you actually have the courage to risk your life out there. Drafted or enlisted makes very little difference at that point.

    6. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by lucm · · Score: 1

      Maybe. But the guy said this:

      I laugh when I hear twerps like you talking shit you absolutely do not and never will have the courage to back up

      That's not a philosophical argument. That's someone using his military background as a trump card to shut the other person up. It shows neither bravery or wisdom, it's a pissing contest pure and simple, and if the person decides to use the fact that he was drafted as evidence of his courage, it's more than fair game to challenge it.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by Xenx · · Score: 1

      When you say that people who didn't run from the draft showed courage, you're insulting people who volunteered.

      Whatever his actions, your extreme stance isn't the right approach. Regardless of your intent, your statement insults both drafted and enlisted. It implies that enlisted people feel they're superior to drafted men and that they feel insulted when drafted men take pride in serving when called upon. You're also saying drafted men shouldn't take pride in serving when called upon. While I cannot speak from experience, I doubt that enlisted vs drafted is their biggest concern during a war.

    8. Re:If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I think you lost your reading comprehension skills. You'd obviously not be fit for combat duty.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  4. Dumb by somenickname · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not, I dunno, sell government approved vape pens in the commissary? From what I've read, most of the incidents with vaping are from people trying to "soup up" their vape machines. This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.

    1. Re:Dumb by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My guess is that it's a result of the endless race to see who can pump the most watts into a sub-ohm coil with the cheapest cells they can find. There's a point at which it turns into something like shorting out a lithium battery.

    2. Re:Dumb by somenickname · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Navy is also concerned about the health effects of nicotine vapors

      Yes, I'm sure this is the reason...

      or the effects of the vapors on sensitive gear.

      The navy is concerned about minuscule amounts of water vapor on ships? We are totally fucked. Next you'll tell me they are running Windows on their battleships...

      The Navy doesn't want vaping, and they don't have to justify it to you or anyone else.

      They certainly don't have to justify it to me but, if I were knowingly sending kids off to their potential death, I'd sure as fuck let them engage in a calming activity that in no way affects their acute performance.

    3. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      they don't have to justify it to you or anyone else

      Actually, yes, they fucking do. We the people not only pay their salaries but as civilians we automatically outrank everyone in the military.

    4. Re:Dumb by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.

      What an idiotic analogy. It's not the same at all, and only an idiot would think it was.

      In fact, it is almost exactly the same, with the caveat that some of these vapes are just garbage to begin with. If you buy the cheapest possible vape off eBay, you can expect it to have no or inadequate current or thermal protection, which makes it dangerous. And of the ones which do have any kind of protection, virtually none of them have caught on fire without being modified first.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Dumb by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Hit the nail on the head right there, that is exactly what a number of people I know are doing. At least got them to stop using cheap batteries after I showed them a few examples.

    6. Re:Dumb by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      There's a point at which someone wins that race, and is rewarded with spectacular effects... /sarcasm

      Beside the unlucky vapers who don't have a clue what they're doing but -indeed- chose the cheapest gear they could find (especially batteries).

    7. Re: Dumb by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a dangerous and addictive habit that does, indeed, produce mild stimulation. People who are nervous or depressed have long reported positive, self-medicating effects with it.

    8. Re:Dumb by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      More like they don't want a lithium battery fire on a billion dollar carrier.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:Dumb by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2

      The problem is batteries. Choosing the right type isn't hard, and despite what someone lower in this thread said, there are lithium batteries that can safely source huge currents. Probably not a dead short, but >20 watts for sure.

      The problem is getting the right batteries. Say you've selected a high current UR18650WX battery - where do you get it? Amazon? Good luck, half of those are counterfeits. eBay? Same, but maybe 75%. Random internet store? Eww. Local vape shop? Ha!

      Oh, did I mention that for most of these batteries, even the genuine ones have just a heat-shrink tube with some black letters printed on it. They also don't have any retail packaging. Not exactly hard to duplicate.

      I don't have the resources to get my hands on genuine batteries more than about half of the time. But the Navy could send a carrier group to Japan or Taiwan to pick up a crate of the real thing to sell/issue to crews. That would eliminate at least 90% of their incidents, probably all of them that aren't caused by physical damage.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    10. Re:Dumb by somenickname · · Score: 2

      My guess is that it's a result of the endless race to see who can pump the most watts into a sub-ohm coil with the cheapest cells they can find.

      By people who wouldn't know an Ohm if a Volt kicked them in the ass.

    11. Re:Dumb by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      No, they are just holding them wrong.

      Don't try to blame this on Apple. Those vape pen are running Samsung firmware, those sailors must have accidentally activated 'incendiary grenade mode'.

    12. Re:Dumb by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Why not, I dunno, sell government approved vape pens in the commissary? From what I've read, most of the incidents with vaping are from people trying to "soup up" their vape machines. This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.

      No, it's more like banning Ford Pinto's on a facility full of powerful conventional ordinance and nuclear weapons.

    13. Re:Dumb by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      No, they are just holding them wrong.

      Don't try to blame this on Apple. Those vape pen are running Samsung firmware, those sailors must have accidentally activated 'incendiary grenade mode'.

      Nah, they were made by Zorg Industries right alongside their (in)famous ZF-1 infantry weapon systems, complete with the little red button.

      No, of course the OP is right, every similar vaping incident I've heard about was ultimately the result of ignorant and stupid people doing Tim Allen/'Tool Time' impersonations trying to "give it more *power*! ugh-ugh!" with their vaping gear.

      Instead of throwing FDA regulations at the vaping industry to try to cripple it because it threatens 'big tobacco' and the taxes tobacco generates, the government should instead assist in bringing industry leaders together to set technical standards for the manufacture of vaping hardware, like fittings sizes, battery and compartment sizes, etc etc, to make it a lot of work to fit a too-powerful battery into a unit that fits a too-weak coil for that capacity battery and so on, the same general idea applied to the range of vaping hardware. Standard sizes and threadings of component parts in the various ratings/classes created in this way can be adopted industry-wide so that dangerously-incompatible components are a lot more trouble for some idiot to put together.

      As usual, government's actions belie their actual priorities, and equally no surprise that the safety of regular people is way down the list.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    14. Re: Dumb by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When you need a nicotine hit you get calm when you get a nicotine hit. Quite simple really.

    15. Re:Dumb by swb · · Score: 1

      I'm sort of willing to grant them leeway on the batteries, especially if its a mod that uses 18650s. Finding legitimate ones isn't easy. I actually bite the bullet and buy them from established brick and mortar vape shops because of all the fakes.

      But even with the fixed batteries most common in the 50-100 watt regulated mods I'm sorta skeptical, especially with vape gear brand identity kind of sketchy outside of a handful of brands that have been around (Kanger, Smok, etc).

    16. Re: Dumb by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The actual problem is extremely poor quality 18650 batteries, most of which have dangerously overrated markings on them. If you buy legit batteries that aren't Chinese knockoff rewraps, there shouldn't be a problem.

      That's also not a problem if you just don't hot-rod your vape.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Dumb by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So... they should remove all ordnance from the ship as well.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    18. Re: Dumb by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Sure sounds good on paper, doesn't it?? Thing is, actually believing it... sort of makes you out to be a complete fucking moron... so you probably don't want to do that. ;)

    19. Re:Dumb by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Ordnance and its handling procedures are designed to be safe. Vaping devices are designed to be cheap.

    20. Re:Dumb by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      Did you sleep through the hundreds of stories in the last few years about phones and laptops with counterfeit batteries bursting into flames? Going to blame them on unregulated cellphone mods?

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    21. Re:Dumb by war4peace · · Score: 1

      No, vaping devices are designed to be safe as well, if purchased from legit places, not fake and handled as they are supposed to be handled. Just like ordnance and everything else, really.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    22. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's exactly *one* civilian who outranks everyone in the military.

      So unless you're Donald Trump posting AC, STFU.

      The weird thing is, there is a possibility that this President does post on Slashdot.
      I just doubt he'd post AC, though.

    23. Re: Dumb by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      If you buy anything vape related, you are a fool.

      FTFY

      And if you buy anything coffee related you are a bigger fool.

      Oh wait, did I trample on a harmless activity that you enjoy that some asswhack nutbags take unfounded offense to? Golly gee, sorry about that!

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    24. Re:Dumb by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Why not, I dunno, sell government approved vape pens in the commissary? From what I've read, most of the incidents with vaping are from people trying to "soup up" their vape machines. This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.

      No, it's more like banning Ford Pinto's on a facility full of powerful conventional ordinance and nuclear weapons.

      Actually, it's banning all wheeled conveyances with combustion engines because someone kept insisting on driving the Pinto. If they'd just ban the 'Pinto' equivalent but let people drive, er, use other reliable models without the inherent design flaws, no problem! Oh, and make modding them a bustable (brigable?) offense, since that shit makes even a trustworthy brand unreliable.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    25. Re:Dumb by Talderas · · Score: 1

      You appear to be confused regarding the chain of command. The Joint Chiefs, branch commanders, and unified command commanders all report to the Secretary of Defense who reports to the President although the Joint Chiefs do directly advise the President. The current secretary of defense is an ex-military civilian but the position of Secretary of Defense has no requirement for previous military service and is very much a civilian position.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  5. Re:Good by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Pull your heads out of your asses

    I don't think they teach pulling out in Navy boot camp.

  6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nicotine isn't carginogenic, Einstein, the thousands of toxic organic compounds produced by combustion are. At least try to get your facts straight before spouting off this bullshit.

  7. Re:Good by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Vaping juice contains mostly the same components as your average medical inhaler cartridge plus some food grade flavorings. There's health concerns if you're dealing with one of the cloud chaser types, but for the most part it's healthier than your average handful of potato chips.

  8. At Work by kackle · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wish they would ban this in my workplace. It's smoking, lite, isn't it?

    1. Re:At Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you thought vape aerosol can't be a health risk for some of the bystanders? Or even just a plain nuisance for everyone?

      If you like it, do it in your backyard.

    2. Re:At Work by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if you consider yourself to be smoking coffee if you can smell it.

    3. Re:At Work by ckatko · · Score: 1

      You list all of those things as if we wouldn't be super happy with our noses not being assaulted on a daily basis by shit smells.

    4. Re:At Work by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Vaping people don't smell like coffee, the ones I know smell like strawberry bubble gum and other chemicals.

    5. Re:At Work by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >"Vaping people don't smell like coffee, the ones I know smell like strawberry bubble gum and other chemicals."

      And food doesn't smell like chocolate but like pig and fish and other chemicals. (Highly offensive to a vegetarian)

      See how silly that sounds? It depends on what people are vaping. There are lots that have almost no smell. Being annoying is not the fault of vaping, it is the fault of what they select. So instruct people to not use stupid smelling stuff. I have been around both types before (smelly and non-smelly) so I know there are differences.

      Cars with illegally modified exhaust systems are loud and annoying. Ban all cars.

      Some motorcycle drivers speed recklessly and weave between cars without using turn signals or leaving adequate clearance. Ban all motorcycles.

      People blasting rap "music" is loud and annoying. Ban all stereos.

      People wearing lots of perfume is horrible and annoying. Ban all toiletries.

      Light pollution destroys the night sky and is annoying. Ban all lights.

      People that walk into traffic looking at phones is unsafe and dangerous. Ban all phones.

      Drunk people who pee on walls is gross and annoying. Ban all alcohol.

      Guns are sometimes used by some bad people to illegally hurt other people (usually bad people), unlike 99.9999% of good gun owners. Ban all guns.

      I could go on, but I think my point is made. There is always a small minority of people that will ruin ANYTHING for everyone else. So back to the actual topic....

      A small fraction of people vaping modify their equipment with cheap crap to do things that are unsafe and stupid. And a small percent of THOSE people cause negative incidents (which is no surprise). That is not a good reason to ban all vaping.

    6. Re:At Work by sjames · · Score: 1

      That depends on their choice of vape. I have a coffee vape that I like. The biggest danger of it is people get their hopes up only to find that there is no coffee available.

      Do you also get upset when someone walking by is chewing artificially flavored strawberry bubblegum?

    7. Re:At Work by sjames · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Which is why I said it's more akin to smelling coffee than it is to smoking tobacco. I vape BTW.

    8. Re:At Work by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      A doctor basically said once that vaping was to smoking like jumping out of a 5th story window was to jumping out of a 10th story window!

      That's so cool you know a celebrity! Say 'hi' to Dr. Nick for me, could you?

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  9. Good ole cigarettes are better for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No surprise there. Also, you get the added benefit of not looking like a pussy.

  10. Re:Good by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The primary antisocial aspects of smoking have nothing to do with health effects and are still very present in vaping.

    The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is the risk of cancer from second hand smoke. While the risk is very small, it is really not acceptable to raise some other person's cancer risk simply to feed one's addiction. It's not even for convenience! Just stupidity. The secondary antisocial aspect is the odor that others have to put up with. While I know intellectually that they have all kinds of scented bullshit for people to vape, I have never actually smelled any of it, and I see people vaping all the time. So unless you have some evidence that second-hand vaping is measurably carcinogenic, no, the primary antisocial aspects of smoking are not "very" present in vaping.

    ObDisclaimer: I do not vape nicotine juice. I have never vaped in public.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Re:Good by lucm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nicotine isn't carginogenic, Einstein

    Says you. Science, on the other hand, says otherwise.

    Nicotine is a known risk factor for cancer development and has been shown to alter gene expression in cells and tissue upon exposure.
    [...]
    This study reveals previously unknown consequences of nicotine stress on the transcriptome of normal breast epithelial cells and provides insight into the underlying biological influence of nicotine on normal cells, marking the foundation for future studies.

    Read the study here:
    http://journals.plos.org/ploso...

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  12. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have fallen for lies and propoganda. Inform yourself:

    http://www.ecigarette-politics.com/nicotine-propaganda.html

  13. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You do know that nicotine is present in many foods (tomato, eggplant, potato, etc) right? Better stop eating those. While you're at it, give two other names for Vitamin B3 (not niacin). Yep, keep demonizing nicotine but keep on consuming it... hypocrite.

  14. Re:Good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is LOOKING LIKE THE IDIOT THAT YOU ARE IF YOU SMOKE .

    there I fixed it for you

    No, that's completely wrong. Someone I can't even see can choke me with their smoke. I've been a smoker, but I haven't been one for years now (not even a cheat smoke, that's fucking gross) and now that I'm not accustomed to sucking smoke all the time, it sets off my asthma immediately.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Re:Good by lucm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have fallen for lies and propoganda

    Says the guy who provides a link to an e-cigarette lobbyist website

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  16. Re:Good by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is the risk of cancer from second hand smoke.

    Um, no. The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is it stinks. Smokers stink. The areas they smoke in stink. Add to that smokers tend to leave their butts anywhere and everywhere. They are fucking obnoxious, over half don't even get why non-smokers don't like them.

  17. Re:Good by sjames · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, you have just run into a vaper over 30.

  18. tinfoil hat much by lucm · · Score: 1

    Says the guy who believes in studies sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry.

    Did you take a minute to check the link? This study was done at Virginia Tech.

    This work was supported by the Medical Informatics and Systems Division director's fund at Virginia Bioinformatics Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:tinfoil hat much by lucm · · Score: 1

      Cherry picking results to match your confirmation bias doesn't mean you're right.

      The question here was not "is it right", it was "is it a study sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry".

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  19. Re:Good by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    > The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is the risk of cancer from second hand smoke.

    The secondary aspects are also problematic. I've acquaintances with asthma, and at my age, acquaintances with emphysema and with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Many of those cases were due to smoking, but fewer and fewer as time progresses and smoking has fallen out of favor. I still meet some, as I age and run into other people as old or older than myself, and I've been able to see their lives as easier without smoke in the workplace or on the streets.

  20. Cheap Li-Ion batteries blow up by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    Buy sub-standard shit, and reap the rewards. Laptops, phones, "hoverboards", e-cigs, whatever. Chinese crap.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  21. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm frankly very surprised by the extreme lack of any understanding of what vaping is, how electronic cigarettes work, in even the most general sense, or what's in e liquid or the vapor. There has been basically no correct information stated anywhere in this whole comment section, except that the actual cause of these injuries is cheap, low quality, Chinese batteries.

    Vaping is a harm reduction activity, for people who have been unsuccessful trying to quit smoking. If you can't get off nicotine, better to get it from vaping than smoking. The Royal College of Physicians in the U.K. estimates vaping is approximately 95% less harmful than cigarettes. You can think what you want, but if you think it's just as bad as cigarettes, you are an idiot. It's also not water vapor being exhaled. I'm not sure where that ever came from, but in it's attempt to make vaping sound safe, it instead makes anyone who repeats it sound stupid. There's no reason for most people to care about vaping unless they know someone who does it, but just know, it's keeping someone from smoking, and that should be reason enough to be ok with at, as long as they don't blow it right in your face.

      I agree that the young crowd who only want to blow huge clouds are ruining it for everyone else, but if it's keeping them off combustible cigarettes, it's still ok with me.

  22. Re:Good by NormanHaga2580 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think you may be a little uniformed. I am near 60 and I vape. So what's my story? I tried quitting smoking for ten years and failed. Started vaping and I have not had a cigarette in two and one half years. I have had two heart attacks, two pulmonary embolisms, and have two stents from smoking. I could feel a difference in my health within a few days after starting to vape. Is nicotine safe? Probably not. Is it safer than the 3000+ harmful components of the typical American chemical laden cigarette? Certainly. The difference is that I use regulated box mods rather than unregulated mods. The chance for explosion is always present if a battery has been dropped. Hell, I have seen cigarettes burst into flame when the chemicals, esp. salt peter, were improperly mixed. If the military wants people off cigarettes, then vaping is an alternative providing you do not overcharge the batteries, drop them, or use unregulated box mods.

  23. Re:Good by ckatko · · Score: 1

    So wait, it kills shit, so it's good to inhale into your body?

  24. More dangerous than fire? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    I think it's time to call it. Vaping industry at large is wholly incompetent.

    1. Re:More dangerous than fire? by sl3xd · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yet, the industry continues to be outpaced by its addicts, asserting endless false claims about safety.

      Flavorings often do horrible things to the lungs, sinuses, and nose - a great example, diacetyl causes "popcorn lung". Diacetyl is found in a lot of foods naturally - its what gives butter its flavor, after all. It's a natural product of fermentation, and shows up in everything from buttermilk to chardonnay.

      Popcorn lung is a great example of what vaping can do - take a natural flavor, heat it with water to form steam, inhale, and cause permanent lung damage only treatable by organ transplant.

      But, much like smoking was a few decades ago, it's users refuse to believe their addiction could possibly be harmful to themselves or others.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    2. Re:More dangerous than fire? by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Oh the irony... I didn't actually think diacetyl would really be applicable for vape fluid (it was just an example from the food industry that I knew off the top of my head), but no, it apparently is a problem in vape fluid. A university study found that found many vape fluids have diacetyl, yet falsely claim they do not.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:More dangerous than fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its important to note that cigarettes contain several hundred times more diacetyl than eliquid, and no one has ever contracted popcorn lung from smoking. Popcorn lung in the food industry was found in workers from ONE popcorn factory who were inhaling dust from large quantities of raw ingredients for extended times. Diacetyl (and acetyl propionyl) has been voluntarily removed from nearly all flavorings used in eliquid production, and if not, its presence is explicitly stated. The eliquid industry's stance has always been that risk, whether actual or perceived, that can be avoided should be.

      Water does not form the "steam" of vapor, a combination of propylene glycol and glycerin does. This demonstrates that what you are doing is simply repeating the scare tactics you read somewhere else without having firsthand knowledge of the subject. In this case, propagating misinformation is indeed more dangerous than fire.

  25. so now... by drewsup · · Score: 2

    sailors will go back to cigarettes.... way to reduce the pension fund? After all, dead sailors dont cost anything, but the lung damage will cost a lot in their final few years of life. This is ridiculous, just set a mil spec standard, let the free market meet that demand, the majority of battery fires are due to cheap ass Chinese crap or as other posters said, heavy mods done incorrectly.

  26. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    New information as of 2013, with no confirmation studies done to-date or meaningful news coverage.

    Probably because it was published in a Brazillian journal of no significance that no one reads.

    Can't really blame someone for not knowing about it. All other sources of study on nicotine indicates no carcinogenic properties. It's the other stuff in cigarettes that kill you.

  27. If they are that dangerous ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    maybe they should be used in Afghanistan. Cheaper than dropping that MOAB! :-)

    1. Re:If they are that dangerous ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Cheap for 70 years of relative world peace though.

  28. Leadership is more than giving and taking orders. by burni2 · · Score: 1

    As you did, one can easily state that giving and taking orders is the prime mode of operation in leadership, and in the meantime it is.

    However especially in times of crisis you need soft skills, you need to have leadership to build up a working team a unit of individuals that works seamlessly, is mentally stable.

    A crisis situation will draw out the real personality of a human and a solid team will stick together and control the extremes.

    And part of that is team building encouragement and a certain amount of leasure time - and even if they want to smoke or to vap - its a stress releave mechanism anyway. Smoking/vaping is also a social mechanism. (smokers group together)

    Military is team work.

    This is why even in the military you need to take account of the human factor, when you ignore it, you will destroy your resources.

  29. Re:They have damage control parties... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    It's even sadder if you have parties without some intoxicants, damage control or not.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  30. Re:Good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Um, no. The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is it stinks. Smokers stink.

    Stink doesn't lead to a painful bed death, breathing through a ventilator. Maybe you should reconsider your priorities.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. Re:Good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    A few days ago I was walking down the street when I saw a guy smoking a cigarette. It looked so dated and ridiculous. I actually felt pity for the poor, out-of-touch guy and I am someone who smoked for 20 years (but quit 8 years ago).

    A few days ago I was walking down the street, when I caught a big lungful of smoke that some addict breathed out around a fucking corner from me, when I couldn't even see him. It left me wheezing for minutes. Someone with more severe asthma who had left their rescue inhaler at home might have died. I actually feel sorry for ACs all the time, for how bullshit they are. Guess how I feel right now?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. Re:Good by war4peace · · Score: 2

    You must have a very limited circle of acquaintances.
    I know vapers of all ages, from 18 to 80, quite literally.

    "I'll never be friends with a vaper" makes you sound retarded, because the reason you provide is retarded.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  33. Re:Good by war4peace · · Score: 1

    All medicine which goes into your body through a nebulizer kills shit and is good to inhale into your body.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  34. Re:Good by war4peace · · Score: 1

    If I drink alcohol that affects you how exactly, long as I don't drive (or post, I guess).

    You gotta be kidding...

    https://www.ncadd.org/about-ad...

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  35. Re: They have damage control parties... by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    Submarines: 150 men go down; 75 couples come up...

  36. Re:Good by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

    You are correct, I hadn't heard. I have heard a great deal of hand wringing about...well, every single food product giving me cancer. Everything from mcnuggets to organic potatoes grown in my own backyard. With the aforementioned chips, it'd be acrylamides that'd definitely maybe kill me. So, you know, whatever.

  37. Re:Good by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    Vaping weed provides wayyyy less offence to most around you. Vape pens are the new normal in dispensary land.

    --
    -
  38. get off your high horse by lucm · · Score: 1

    Regardless of your intent, your statement insults both drafted and enlisted.

    No they don't, and there's no point in you in being offended on their behalf. Veterans are not fragile children that must be protected from possibly controversial discussions, they're normal people who happened to have been to war. If a veteran comes here and start using his military background to support his accusation of cowardice aimed at other users, he's opening the door to questioning his own courage. This is not disrespectful of military service, don't SJW-ize it.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:get off your high horse by Xenx · · Score: 1

      You're the one that insisted that making a statement about one of the groups was insulting to the other. I said making a statement about both groups is insulting. Now, you're trying to claim it doesn't matter. This wasn't about defending them from your idiotic comments. This was about pointing out where/why you were wrong, and hoping you might think about it. Barring obvious exceptions, anyone that serves deserves respect. Your comments, at the very least, disparage the service of drafted men.

    2. Re:get off your high horse by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "If a veteran comes here and start using his military background to support his accusation of cowardice aimed at other users, he's opening the door to questioning his own courage."

      Sounds like you think I'm a veteran. I'm not. I'm the grandchild of a very fucking high-level veteran (Lt. Colonel) who fought everything from WWII to Korea and Vietnam. He knows what real humans are composed of. You very obviously do not.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:get off your high horse by lucm · · Score: 1

      I'm the grandchild of a very fucking high-level veteran (Lt. Colonel) who fought everything from WWII to Korea and Vietnam.

      I see. That totally makes you a valid spokeperson for the military in general.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  39. Re:Good by samwichse · · Score: 1

    Replying to erase accidental moderation.

  40. Re:Good by david_thornley · · Score: 2

    The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is the risk of cancer from second hand smoke.

    Cancer isn't the only dangerous thing smoking causes, although it is the most scary thing. Smoking can cause all sorts of respiratory distress and heart issues.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  41. Re:Leadership is more than giving and taking order by Talderas · · Score: 1

    The Navy is only banning vaping on shippings and I can see the reasoning for it. While vaping may be better for your health long term the situation on board a ship is a bit different. First of all, you're on a ship. You don't have access to expert medical facilities so while vape devices have thus far only caused 77 days worth of injuries, they've been minor enough that they could be handled by the ship's medbay. There's likely a concern here regarding a more severe injury and the isolation from higher quality medical services where something that shouldn't be life-threatening if you were stateside or on a base suddenly becomes life threatening.

    While vaping may be healthier compared to cigarettes you're talking long term chronic health. There's no question that when we're talking about short-term and immediate health that cigarettes are safer than vaping and I can't believe I just typed that phrase.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  42. Re: They have damage control parties... by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

    90 couples. There are always people cheating.
    Source: was in the navy on a submarine
    No, I'm not gay, but the jokes are hilarious