Slashdot Mirror


Google Home Now Recognizes Specific Users' Voices, Gains Support For Multiple Accounts (phonedog.com)

Google has issued a long-awaited feature for Google Home: support for multiple users. In an update rolling out today, up to six people will be able to connect their Google account to a Google Home, and the unit will try to distinguish each person's voice from the other users connected to the device. Therefore, each person will be able to get access to their schedule, playlists, and more. PhoneDog reports: Support for multiple users is rolling out in the U.S. now and will be available in the U.K. in the coming months. To know if the feature is available to you, launch the Google Home app and look for a card that says "Multi-user is available." You can also click the icon in the upper right corner, find your Google Home, and select "Link your account." From there, you'll train the Google Assistant to recognize your voice so that it knows it's you when you're talking and not the other people with connected accounts. You'll say "Ok Google" and "Hey Google" twice each.

48 comments

  1. One question by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is the "Burger King" user pre-installed?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:One question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More like, was the Burger King ad campaign done in collusion with Google as stealth advertising for this new Google Home feature which must have been in development at the time.

    2. Re:One question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be. Everyone who uses voice activation on Android owes Burger King for exposing Google for the security amateurs that they really are.

  2. That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay!

    1. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All right! A stupid Burger King joke and now an inane "Fools! You are being spied on by the NSA!" comment. Hopefully comments can now move on to something interesting.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

    3. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All right! A stupid Burger King joke and now an inane "Fools! You are being spied on by the NSA!" comment. Hopefully comments can now move on to something interesting.

      Let's not forget the arrogant dismissal comments written by clueless poseur cunts like you.

    4. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :(
      That was really mean.
      Isn't the Internet for being nice?

    5. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they when the device itself is pointless crap being pushed by an advertising company for the sole purpose of ... advertising.

      If the object in question was remotely interesting then the comments might be. As it stands, Google Home is only worth Burger King jokes.

    6. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Personally I think Alexa, for all its obvious faults, is the most personally useful computer innovation I've seen since Smartphone GPS got decent. If Google Home is about the same thing, then certainly it isn't pointless or just a forum for advertisements.

    7. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMFAO

    8. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      The Internet? A free and open platform for the sharing of ideas and free speech?

      There is no free speech anywhere on the Internet. The SJWs shut that down completely.

      Remove your digital 'footprint' and move to another state, or you're at risk of being attacked for the most minor of 'micro-aggressions'.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    9. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no free speech anywhere on the Internet. The SJWs shut that down completely.

      Yes, you were totally prevented from saying *what you just said* by the "SJWs". Retard.

    10. Re:That is 6x more tracking and customized ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, just kill yourself. You're already dead inside.

  3. Yeah, let's get voiceprints for everyone ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anyone stop to think that Google could be a front for the NSA or other government entities and that many of these Google
    projects could involve ulterior motives ?

    Not that a government capable of things such as the Tuskegee Study or MK-Ultra or the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
    could possibly have evil intent, of course.

    1. Re:Yeah, let's get voiceprints for everyone ... by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Of course not. Our government would NEVER lie to us!

    2. Re:Yeah, let's get voiceprints for everyone ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Does anyone stop to think that Google could be a front for the NSA

      No. Why would they risk the (currently theoretical, but may someday happen) Congressional oversight on data use. As a private company, they have way more ability to abuse your data. And, if they ever wanted the NSA to fuck up your life, they could instead forward selected bits to them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  4. 1984 was not an instruction manual by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just saying, Google.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  5. Slight problem by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    This discriminates against identical twins. Lawsuit pending. This is not a serious post.

  6. Good luck with that by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    The home is a place where brothers and sisters with really similar voices can live together. Since some parents have trouble distinguishing their children's voices, Google will have a hard time there.

    1. Re:Good luck with that by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Ohhh wow, I bet Google never thought of that! You should email them right away and let them know.

    2. Re: Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Muslim households, where all the kids are named Mohamed?

    3. Re: Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live with my sister. We have lots of fun. And some pregnancy scares from time to time.

    4. Re: Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really envy you. Me I like to think of myself as highly progressive, but I feel as you do, sex belongs in the family.

    5. Re: Good luck with that by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      His family incests on the very best!

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    6. Re: Good luck with that by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

      "Google, make an appointment for a photo shoot at that place that sells gut bombs, the Aloha Snackbar."

      What could go wrong?

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    7. Re: Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definition of relative humidity:

      The sweat that runs down the crack of your ass when you are fucking your sister in-law.

    8. Re:Good luck with that by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've noticed that my mom and my aunt sound a lot alike.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    9. Re:Good luck with that by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Ohhh wow, I bet Google never thought of that! You should email them right away and let them know.

      I never thought they could be unaware of the challenge. I am just skeptical about their chances of doing something that really works here.

  7. Another question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if your kid is a was-female and starts taking testosterone as part of their gender-reassignment process, resulting in a voice change. Do they lose all their searches?

  8. This is freaking impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is kicking ass and taking names. Recognizing voices on the fly while doing speech recognition is no small accomplishment. But whoever solves the cocktail party problem (the ability to focus on just one voice while many people are talking at the same time) will take the cake.

    1. Re:This is freaking impressive by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

      More Cake for the NSA! Yea!

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    2. Re:This is freaking impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not impressive at all. Naturally Speaking has been doing this for the past two decades.

  9. Self prescient much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The LAST thing I want to say when walking into my home, bedroom, kitchen, garage etc is Ok/hey Google.
    I mean what the heck man.
    Stop being facetious with us for click revenue relevance in our homes.

  10. What if your voice changes? by risc8088 · · Score: 2

    Does it work if your voice changes due to having a cold? Does it work if you whisper? If you yell? Just curious.

    Sure I could probably google these questions but the tech is too new and does anyone else feel like its harder and harder to get the right info from google nowadays? For example I don't want results from 2011 at the top of the list when i'm searching for new tech stuff!! Eh I'm probably just bad at googling. Theres probably a shitload of google search commands that I dont know about. meh :|

    1. Re:What if your voice changes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does thanks to DSP. Enjoy your new subservient lifestyle.

  11. please give me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please give me , your name , phone number signature, retina , voice and social insurance number ......
    oh and fart in this so we can verify dna

  12. And there goes yet another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The faggot who listens to wiretaps and bugs is done, now even bullshit countries like Zimbabwe can afford to fire his ass.

  13. Recognize my voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to be given to the Police, FBI and the NAS or any other agency, when they come calling to Google? No thanks.

  14. Open the pod bay doors, Google by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, Dave. I can't do that.

    --
    slashdot: A failed experiment.
    1. Re:Open the pod bay doors, Google by coofercat · · Score: 1

      ...and no more "Hey Google - call an ambulance as this guy's having a heart attack" either.

      We're really at version 0.9 of this sort of tech. First they need to distinguish between a few known voices per device. Then they need to distinguish *every* voice, and not sorry which device those voices were heard on. Then they need to be able to act intelligently for any unknown voices - of course, one man's 'intelligent response' is another's 'complete bollocks'. After all that, they need to actually be able to do something useful - really useful like "Hey Google, hold my calls unless they're important" - a human can do that quite easily, but it'll be a while before computers can. When they can though, we might be at v1.0. It's okay, I can wait ;-)

    2. Re:Open the pod bay doors, Google by Dupedupeshakur · · Score: 1

      ...and no more "Hey Google - call an ambulance as this guy's having a heart attack" either.

      We're really at version 0.9 of this sort of tech. First they need to distinguish between a few known voices per device. Then they need to distinguish *every* voice, and not sorry which device those voices were heard on. Then they need to be able to act intelligently for any unknown voices - of course, one man's 'intelligent response' is another's 'complete bollocks'. After all that, they need to actually be able to do something useful - really useful like "Hey Google, hold my calls unless they're important" - a human can do that quite easily, but it'll be a while before computers can. When they can though, we might be at v1.0. It's okay, I can wait ;-)

      Based on the product road map you've laid out, they would currently be closer to 0.1 than 0.9. Voice recognition has been around a long time. Cloud computing has just helped make it "smarter" by allowing multiple recognition engines to be run in parallel, with the most confident engine's interpretation being selected.

  15. My pixel has had this since I got it. by smbell · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised this is a new feature for the Home. Although it's not fool proof. It recognizes my older son as me most of the time.

  16. The big question by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    If the Google Home doesn't identify a command as coming from any of the voices it "knows", does it ignore the input or does it follow the command anyway?

    It should do the former, but I'm betting on the latter.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:The big question by Dupedupeshakur · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it should be a configurable option - defaulted to security over usability.

  17. Hello, Google, can you tell me?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello Google/Amazon, can you tell me when my neighbour will be home??

    Do they have a dog??

    Do they have a home security system??

    Have they bought anything expensive this year???

    Did they purchase a safe in the last 5 years???

    Thank you google/Amazon, you have been of great service.

  18. Echo versus GH implmentation by jacksmith21006 · · Score: 1

    The Echo has a code you use for different accounts and the Google Home (GH) just uses your voice.

    The Echo is really more of a computer interface and has you do the work and the GH is intelligent and far more human in how it does things.

    Really love the voice authentication with the GH as it makes so many use cases now possible.

    For example, in our home I prefer some of my kids to be unable to lower the AC thermostat. Now I can have some able to when they ask the GH in the kitchen and others are not able to. But no awkward passcodes, etc.

    The other is I am fine with guest able to do some things and then others I only want "privileged" users to be able to do. With the Echo it was trivial for people to learn the passcode. Now with the GH I say it and it will work and they say it and it will not.

    But everything is like this with the GH versus the Echo. A huge one is the Echo has commands you memorize and the GH you just talk to it like a human.

    So a little kid can use the GH as well as a grandma. Kind of like Google Search. Same text box for a 5 year old as a rocket scientist as well as grandma. Exactly how technology should be. Why on earth should we still have to use passcodes?

    Amazon needs to replace the foundation of the Echo to have intelligence if they want to be competitive.

  19. You have this shit *in your home?* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yes, I voluntarily installed the secret police monitoring equipement, because it saved me having to do a little work when shopping on-line!"

    "I love knowing Google and our Federal Government and Agency overlords are able to listen in to my every word! don't you trust the Government?"