Slashdot Mirror


Five Years Later, Legal Megaupload Data Is Still Trapped On Dead Servers (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: It's been more than five years since the government accused Megaupload and its founder Kim Dotcom of criminal copyright infringement. While Dotcom himself was arrested in New Zealand, U.S. government agents executed search warrants and grabbed a group of more than 1,000 servers owned by Carpathia Hosting. That meant that a lot of users with gigabytes of perfectly legal content lost access to it. Two months after the Dotcom raid and arrest, the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a motion in court asking to get back data belonging to one of those users, Kyle Goodwin, whom the EFF took on as a client. Years have passed. The U.S. criminal prosecution of Dotcom and other Megaupload executives is on hold while New Zealand continues with years of extradition hearings. Meanwhile, Carpathia's servers were powered down and are kept in storage by QTS Realty Trust, which acquired Carpathia in 2015. Now the EFF has taken the extraordinary step of asking an appeals court to step in and effectively force the hand of the district court judge. Yesterday, Goodwin's lawyers filed a petition for a writ of mandamus (PDF) with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, which oversees Virginia federal courts. "We've been asking the court for help since 2012," said EFF attorney Mitch Stolz in a statement about the petition. "It's deeply unfair for him to still be in limbo after all this time."

82 comments

  1. That's the big problem... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you keep your data in the cloud, and don't keep backups on hand, you're at the mercy of the powers to be. I pulled my data out of the cloud when I realized that I didn't need to have it on the Internet 24/7. A local file server works fine for my needs.

    1. Re:That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. At the very least, "HAVE A BACKUP". I say anyone who doesn't understand this basic principal of cloud computing deserves to lose their data.

    2. Re:That's the big problem... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I pulled my data out of the cloud when I realized that I didn't need to have it on the Internet 24/7.

      Pity T J Maxx, Target, and Yahoo didn't do the same.

    3. Re:That's the big problem... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I didn't know cloud computing had a principal. I guess it's still in school.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:That's the big problem... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. At the very least, "HAVE A BACKUP". I say anyone who doesn't understand this basic principal of cloud computing deserves to lose their data.

      Anyone who understands cloud computing probably isn't going to use the cloud.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:That's the big problem... by Teancum · · Score: 2

      The problem is the presumption that the data doesn't have a physical location when you are dealing with a cloud. You may not directly know where a given hunk of data is physically stored at, but such storage is still a requirement for current computing practices. It can be destroyed, confiscated, lost, or even simply scrambled where you have no control over what happens. It can also be copied and distributed to places which may not be in a place you want it at (like a competitor or somebody who intends to do you harm).

      Keeping data in a cloud is fine for temporary stuff or for data that is of a transitory nature that might be discarded a day or two later. Also if the data is of a nature that if it is published on the front page of a newspaper or on Wikipedia, nobody would care.... you generally don't have a problem. If you really want to keep the data for any length of time... due to legal requirements or even something that is vital to the mission success of your company or organization, it is really idiotic to rely upon 3rd parties who don't have a vested interested in your success to be keeping that data.

    6. Re:That's the big problem... by quenda · · Score: 1

      Backups are good.
      For anyone using google, they make it very easy to download a copy of *all* your data.
      If you use Android, that's probably your email, photos, calendar, location history, search history, contacts, medical records, DNA sequence, and sexual deviations, ...

      They will bundle your whole life up into one little insignificant tar file.

      Go here: https://takeout.google.com/set...

    7. Re:That's the big problem... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I know people who are perfectly happy to have their only copy of their photos on iCloud because "It's Apple! They have backups!"

      Umm no. Even they do, you have no control over those backups, when they're made or how to recover the data if it's lost.

      Keep your own damn backups, people. Treat cloud services as just another single, lose-able copy of your data.

    8. Re:That's the big problem... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Considering all the Crypto lockers running around even the "cloud' is not safe, especially if you only realize it AFTER your files are encrypted and get synced with the version on the file, effectively overwriting your "backup' with the encrypted file.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    9. Re:That's the big problem... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I know people who are perfectly happy to have their only copy of their photos on iCloud because "It's Apple! They have backups!"

      I have a friend who works at a Sprint store. He recently transferred 75GB of photos between old and new iPhones. The user had no other backup for this data.

    10. Re:That's the big problem... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. At the very least, "HAVE A BACKUP". I say anyone who doesn't understand this basic principal of cloud computing deserves to lose their data.

      Anyone who understands cloud computing probably isn't going to use the cloud.

      Winner winner, chicken dinner!

    11. Re:That's the big problem... by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      What kind of "cloud" backup service does not have incremental versions? Mine certainly does, it doesn't even have any limit on how many previous versions are stored, and I find it hard to imagine that this is the exception.

      That being said, GP is right of course that you cannot rely on network backup as the only backup.

    12. Re:That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRUE! Except one thing...
      - people are now clueless as to "Default Creep".
      - people use frontends, and are unaware (or uninterested) in 'how it works' behind the scenes. Therefore...
      - if a service or tool uses cloud storage, the user just accepts it. They don't write the company CEO for a local copy on their C:/

      People are literally becoming used to just 'waking up & using stuff'. The behind the scenes how's and why's are fading into Default.
      (equal comparison: the "idiot lights" on cars, telling you to change the oil- etc. One used to just 'do that' as a responsible car owner. Now it's an automatic announcement).

    13. Re:That's the big problem... by Asgard · · Score: 1

      A half-decent cloud backup will keep versions for an extended period, so you could recover to the point in time before the crypto. A live sync that clobbers history is little better than a RAID array.

    14. Re:That's the big problem... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Hell I use it.
      Google drive.
      I am in a violently bitter divorce and all the docs are on a google drive so I can pull them up on my phone at a moment's notice, while also being able to actually work on them on my PC.

      Risk? yes.
      Worth it when I can pull up the latest custody order on a moment's notice to demonstrate I do, in fact, have custody of my kids right now? Priceless (and the cops like it too).

      Still keep the oblig hardcopy binder like any court system docs, and an offline copy made weekly or when there are big changes.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    15. Re:That's the big problem... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You can hate Apple all you want, but at least they offer a reasonable price for their online backups. $0.99/mo. for up to 50GB. $2.99/mo. for up to 200GB. 5GB or under is free.

      I tell almost anyone with a nearly full phone to sign up - because they can opt to store fewer of the photos on the device itself. This doesn't preclude a local backup, but that will never happen with most users.

    16. Re:That's the big problem... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You can hate Apple all you want [...]

      Where in my comment did I write that I "hate Apple"?

      I tell almost anyone with a nearly full phone to sign up - because they can opt to store fewer of the photos on the device itself.

      A feature I don't use because I regularly move data off of my iPhone on a regular basis.

    17. Re:That's the big problem... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      The problem is having only one copy, no matter whether that one copy is in the cloud or not.

    18. Re:That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no cloud. It's just someone else's computer.

    19. Re:That's the big problem... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Where in my comment did I write that I "hate Apple"?

      The English language doesn't have a word for the plural "you" except in the American South. I don't mean you , personally.

      A feature I don't use because I regularly move data off of my iPhone on a regular basis.

      Again, not advice specifically for you.

    20. Re:That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad that they just give their cloud stuff to basically anyone who asks. It's also too bad that you can't change providers to ones where they actually encrypt your stuff before it hits their servers so breaches like the Hollywood actresses a couple years ago can't happen.

      If you say that nobody will want that kind of protection... Kind of curious though... can you share files to other users like every other provider can? They better be cheap -- they gouge everywhere else.

      Side note: I can buy a 128GB SD card for $20 bucks here. In 6 months, I will have saved more money and kept my privacy.

    21. Re:That's the big problem... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      An SD card is not even a medium-term backup. I'd trust a magnetic charge on a platter over an electrostatic charge held in limbo for months or years.

    22. Re: That's the big problem... by oobayly · · Score: 1

      A colleague installed cryptolocker and it encrypted all his Dropbox files. All he has to do was contact Dropbox and say "please revert to this date, before the bulk delete and upload occurred".

      I'm not saying you should rely upon that, but recovery was simple because of how cryptolocker renames every file.

    23. Re:That's the big problem... by kriston · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you can call it "cloud backup" but Amazon Cloud Drive does not have incremental versions. Nor does Microsoft OneDrive.

      --

      Kriston

    24. Re:That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The English language does have a word for the plural "you". It's "you".

      What it has lost (apart from some disappearing regional dialects) is the words for the singular you - thou, thee, thine.

    25. Re:That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without data in a cloud what do you do when they take your or your service providers hardware?

    26. Re: That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf? I mean seriously. Wtf?

    27. Re:That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably about 20 years? :)
      Granted, I don't think I've ever had a powered-off HDD fail to spin up after years in a drawer, unless it gets dropped/wet/etc.

    28. Re:That's the big problem... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Without data in a cloud what do you do when they take your or your service providers hardware?

      Ummm, that's the strangest comment I've read all day.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    29. Re:That's the big problem... by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 2

      He HAD a backup hard drive. When he found that the hard drive had failed, he tried to access the files on Megaupload. In how many places should he have kept his data, and how much more should he have spent purchasing the hardware or subscribing to a storage service in the case that both his local hard drive and the cloud account where he stored his data were rendered inaccessible?

    30. Re: That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they do.

      MyData201703.tc
      MyData201702.tc ...

    31. Re: That's the big problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit that happened. We all know creimer doesn't have friends, because they are all jelly of his self published ebook about how he had a fifteen hundred calorie a day diet while powerlifting for years and staying a svelte three hundred and fifty pounds.

    32. Re: That's the big problem... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      My ebooks are available at Amazon and Smashwords. You can also visit me at my author website, personal blog, YouTube and Twitter.

  2. cloud storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we not learned already by this time?

    Do not store anything in the cloud that you cannot afford to lose access to. It can go away at any time for any reason.

    1. Re:cloud storage by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Also do not store anything in the cloud that you cannot afford to get released on the Internet for anyone to see.

      iVBOR w0KGg oAAAA NSUhE UgAAA DIAAA AyBAM AAADs EZWCA AAAHl BMVEX ///// 95flf rP4uc 7etAbv
      1k+5l gUAAA AAraj u1U4i M4/UA AABjE lEQVR 4Xt3S wWobQ QwG4G FZNul R7kCv u5LpO Zb8AK O1+gAF
      O+ceb J+TEo iPBT9 B3rir mSWeD e29VM f55hd CKPy3 lRza9 AEQcR 1D6IL G1hZA LBr7c PqhUW MFjTCR
      fh+7w xEMai ERZtX d1yyp iiAJI hTRZY QRwOX xGCHa LeLgt ePzPo LFSmj IQvy4 N9BKm OH1Oc tBo8GI
      2N/k6 e4FVo KTxOi T9rNs 4RKeg QRPCt EESXg WeXu9 v/spz GdfAQ uT9PM E+nRp aZJvk xii8B wi0i+X
      TyQ0R M07oE rg10p YBlDQ TfQuZ Qbawh uQEEM Ek2sW ytJsQ YE8Av D5uqk kkNno Ea/NJ MTMGa 7et4iH
      JqEi9 /Lgn2 StJZT em13p ockyU 6K5WS MNNkI owwrM rJKAo fc88Q ApnNR FMJTq ibFhN EuhU7 CdEM7S
      IIYO8 9F0e4 DxJiE /FTmY C/ULy fd0Om gk5kr C8V1g ZOZK2 puYD1 dVOZp uEhiX 0mYJ5 6NLX0 tI84+l
      LNvSX 2SdiP 8Ivsa PkWpZ /0T9B hLeXd CsVfZ s

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:cloud storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I wanted to do was see what you were putting on the Internet for anyone to see, but all I get is an invalid PNG when I try to decode it. ;(

      "You know what. That makes me mad." - Droopy

    3. Re:cloud storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm it is a valid PNG. Make sure to remove all spaces. The string is 644 characters.

    4. Re:cloud storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got it. I had an old, and apparently bad b64 utility.

  3. Dead but no lost but maybe by SniffTheGlove · · Score: 2

    When the servers went offline, many thousands of people lost access to their work and home files. I have my photo archive on Megaupload but I have still got no way to get it back as some scardy cat corporate tosser says "No" to everyone just in case someone might get a copy of some porno or action movie. FFS

    1. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just restore it from your backup. What's that, you don't have a backup? Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

    2. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Just restore it from your backup. What's that, you don't have a backup?

      Cloud storage is their backup.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's clouds, all the way down.

    4. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      Cloud storage is their backup.

      No, it was their backup. When it went away they should have created another one.

    5. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people wonder why blockchain based encrypted file storage like Storj is a thing.

    6. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Cloud storage is their backup.

      No, it was their backup. When it went away they should have created another one.

      The problem of course, is that cloud storage was touted as a backup. So if you have to have a local backup, it kind of makes the cloud storage backup redundant and pointless.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Cloud storage is their backup.

      No, it was their backup. When it went away they should have created another one.

      The problem of course, is that cloud storage was touted as a backup. So if you have to have a local backup, it kind of makes the cloud storage backup redundant and pointless.

      Some people have multiple backups in different locations. That redundancy is not pointless.

    8. Re:Dead but no lost but maybe by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Cloud storage is their backup.

      No, it was their backup. When it went away they should have created another one.

      The problem of course, is that cloud storage was touted as a backup. So if you have to have a local backup, it kind of makes the cloud storage backup redundant and pointless.

      Some people have multiple backups in different locations. That redundancy is not pointless.

      That would be me. On nice hard drives that I own, and control.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. It's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kept telling people that Mediafire was objectively better and that Megaupload was not worth using. People laughed at me.

    Now who's laughing!? Now who's laughing!? Now who's laughing!? Now who's laughing!?

  5. Do the terms of use matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be interesting to see how this turns out, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
    The govt might have a responsibility to return the legal data to the rightful owner, but with Megaupload's TOS, I'd bet that is not the user.
    If Megaupload was in fact breaking the law, then the govt probably had an arguable right to take them down.
    This likely made them go bankrupt.

    I'd bet Megaupload's terms of use has a clause that says if something outside their control happens, then the user has no recourse against them.
    Which says that even if the servers were returned to Megaupload, they would likely not become available to the user.

    I think this shows a fundamental weakness in depending on cloud based services.
    Live by the could, die by the cloud.

  6. Of course its deeply unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "deeply unfair" is central theme of all US copyright law.

    Why would you expect anything else?

  7. Unbelievable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to say unbelievable, but I have seen this first hand in at least 10 cases where the government simply drags its feet with staff lawyers and causes parties to pay for commercial lawyers at $300-500 per hour. For up to a DECADE.

    1. Re:Unbelievable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to see government keeping them in work until they're all replaced by Perl scripts.

    2. Re:Unbelievable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to see government keeping them in work until

      they'll become politicians themselves and keep the gravy train rolling.

  8. Is his data still relevant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/t

  9. The Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of many reasons the cloud makes a terrible backup. The US government may confiscate your legal data during an investigation, and it takes years before they return it.

    1. Re:The Cloud by sheramil · · Score: 1

      This is one of many reasons the cloud makes a terrible backup. The US government may confiscate your legal data during an investigation, and it takes years before they return it.

      Exactly! People, keep your backups on a thumbdrive, so that the police can confiscate it instead.

    2. Re:The Cloud by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      This isn't the reason the cloud makes a terrible backup. The thing that you want to avoid with a backup is correlated failures: things that cause a failure of your primary store should be different from things that cause a failure of your backup. Your house burning down or thieves coming and stealing your computers will cause failures of both your original and on-site backups. It's a lot less likely that the founder of your cloud provider will be arrested for the same reason that you lose your laptop.

      Remember: it only matters if your backup storage fails at the same time as your on-line storage.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:The Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This only applies to servers located in the US and/or companies located in the US. Don't rely in US companies and ask companies where they store their data. If they are neither US companies nor store data in the US, you'll be fine.

      The US is the only country in the world in which seizing servers and not releasing the data of unrelated parties (aka victims) for five years is legally possible. Or at least, I don't know of any similar case elsewhere.

    4. Re:The Cloud by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      This presumes that the cloud solution doesn't also live sync with your machine, else an accidental delete is not covered...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:The Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have yet to see the police confiscate many PB's of data, to capture one pedophile with a few GB of data.

    6. Re:The Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I chuckled

  10. Original article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a great line in the original article:
    "If the government takes over your bank, it doesn’t get to keep the family jewels you stored in the vault," [EFF Legal Director Corynne] McSherry wrote in the case statement. "There’s a process for you to get your stuff back, and you have a right to the same protection for your data."
    The article focuses on someone who's hard drive failed 2 days before the seizure of the servers. Thus, that person's files on Megaupload became the only existing copies of some of the data at the time.
    The article also discusses the lack of the courts response over 5 years in dealing with the issue. Meanwhile, "In 2015, proceedings on the matter kicked up again when QTS, the successor to Carpathia, told the district court it needed relief from the ongoing expense of maintaining the seized hard drives in its climate-controlled warehouse. QTS lawyers said the parties should either take possession of the hard drives, compensate QTS for storage, or allow QTS to delete and re-use the drives."

  11. Re:Thanks, Obama! by mean+pun · · Score: 1

    And you wondered what all those donations to Democrats from Hollywood and the music industry bought?

    Ok, spell it out then: what did they buy?

  12. Re:Thanks, Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, spell it out then: what did they buy?

    N. I. G. G. E. R. S.

  13. Spreading/sharing by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Also do not forget that if sharing is what you want (so granma and granpa can see video of their grandkids) :

    - Tarsnap, Dropbox, Google Drive might be more expensive for equivalent storage size / bandwidth. But at least there's less risk for them to go belly up.
    (Even if there's risk for those with non-free/closed-source clients to rape your privacy).
    And you should keep a local copy on your NAS anyway.

    - You can serve the files from your NAS (lots of them feature file server), and YOU can control the protection (e.g.: GPG-encrypted files. Or simply AES-password protected Zip archives if your relative are less tech savvy).

    For sharing with more users simultaneously (video of your *wedding*. And suddenly all the 20 branches of the family scattered around the planet want them) :
    - You can also serve the files over torrent, so you don't need a big bandwidth. Most NAS have also the option built-in.
    And again YOU are in charge of the protection (But if you want strong security, just dont use 'Password123' to encrypt the archive, even if that clueless cousin asks for something easy to remember).

    No matter what keep a separate local copy (keep a copy on your NAS if you go DropBox. Keep a (non encrypted) copy in a separate non-shared directory on your NAS or a separate NAS if you serve the file themselves).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  14. MegaUpload has ToS for uploaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Determination of unfairness is MegaUpload screens data on the agreement that it is not illegal and only rightful owners or lessee has access to it, and even better is thebphysical IP address is logged from where the accounted data is received or transfered or copied or departed from to MegaUpload servers (all those catgeroical data pull and move determinations are each unique and depend on your jurisprudence to engauge them).

    Rather than certain data being targetted with a DMCA notice to MegaUpload service owner and accounting assessed for the data origins, they shutdown the company.

    Everyone blames the gas station for polution now? When Seth Rogan stole Pineapple Express script by physically lifting the writer off the ground while threatening and pinning to the wall, the theatres only boycott to host the movie. Production company didnt seize, none of that. The independent script writer was threatened enough that no complaint was made and no lawsuit filed.

    When the United States was created free and independent durring the Civil War out of the States of America, this is another mark of turmoil to it's existance in replacing the Crown of England in sending swarms of officers to eat out the substance of anyone.

    1. Re:MegaUpload has ToS for uploaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have seen what they did when people created (legal) portable music players. They freaked when MP3 players (and not even recorders!) came out. They're like the mob, and don't even care if it's in their best interests to let the technology exist. Don't control it? Then they'll burn down your shop with their lawyers. They wonder why they're universally loathed and no one feels guilt about downloading albums.

      Also, don't forget Dance On Jack Valenti's Grave day It's the 10th anniversary of that pr*ck's death.

  15. A lot of laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DMCA, the Mickey Mouse copyright extension, ... quite a lot of things really.

    On the flip side, there's an interesting point that Kim Dotcom predicted Hillary's troubles with wikileaks long before they happened. It's all public, on his Twitter feed. He had quite a grudge against her over all this.

  16. "You might beat the rap, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you won't beat the ride."

    A former cop once told me that about being arrested back in the "old days" when some cops would make sure suspects got a "rough ride" to the jailhouse.

    I hope that these days, professionalism and, if necessary, fear of lawsuits, put an end to that kind of abuse.

    Obviously, law enforcement has found other ways to make lives miserable for suspects who may or may not have committed any crimes.

    1. Re:"You might beat the rap, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that these days, professionalism and, if necessary, fear of lawsuits, put an end to that kind of abuse.

      Obviously, law enforcement has found other ways to make lives miserable for suspects who may or may not have committed any crimes.

      The only things that have had any real effectiveness in curbing brutality and lawlessness among law enforcement are cellphone videos and YouTube, and yet even knowing that they'll likely make themselves a YouTube star, never a day goes by without uploads of fresh video evidence of brutality and outrageous and blatant criminality by law enforcement at all levels, State, local, and Federal with many prosecutors, AGs, DAs, judges, and courts turning a blind eye or even actively colluding and conspiring to deny victims justice.

  17. Re:Thanks, Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The long tentacles of the music industry have far reach, and are not afraid of the things that kill in Australia.

    Until we have global reform on copyright, decentralized p2p services are the only ones that are resistant to these shenanigans unless its in a country who just gives the US and their unofficial bosses the middle finger.

  18. Car analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 years later, my legal project car is still trapped in a dead chop shop that was closed down due to the obvious problem of parts fencing. Why did I take my car there instead of a legit auto shop? Uh.

    1. Re:Car analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awful analogy is bad.

  19. Re:Thanks, Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you wondered what all those donations to Democrats from Hollywood and the music industry bought?

    Ok, spell it out then: what did they buy?

    Let me guess: you congratulate yourself on how smart you are, too.

    You go and keep telling yourself that.

  20. Re:Thanks, Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They buy a favour or two.

    What do the donations from oil companies and the like get them? Secretary of _____ in the US government.

    LOL

  21. Asset forfeiture? by bradley13 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Geez, I know this is Slashdot, but really. The guy did have a second copy, but it died - as copies do - at the worst possible instant. In this case, basically as the Mega servers were being seized. Should he have had a 3rd copy? A 4th? Sure, but that's not the point.

    The point is: the US government seized servers containing data from thousands and thousands of users. The US government has made no provisions at all for people to retrieve their property. This is theft, plain and simple.

    Consider this in meatspace: The government raids a restaurant thought to be violating health regulations. They seize all property in the restaurant: not only stuff belonging to the business, but the wallets, purses and bags belonging to the customers. The restaurant is in limbo - that's bad enough - but why should the customers' private property be seized and never released.

    Of course, this is the same country that allows asset forfeiture. I'm sure your wallet is guilty of some crime or other...

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Asset forfeiture? by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Of course, this is the same country that allows asset forfeiture. I'm sure your wallet is guilty of some crime or other...

      It doesn't have to be, here's how it goes:

      It looks like you're carrying lots of money. Drug dealers carry lots of money. Hence I will confiscate this money as possible drug profits. If you can show a paper trail in court, you can have it back some day. If you can't, tough. If you need the money right now, tough. Oh and there's no presumption of innocence and no free legal aid since it's a civil matter, if you lose as you very well might you'll also lose a ton on lawyer and court costs.

      One joint was sufficient to confiscate a sailboat. A cheating husband's wife lost their jointly owned car because he was illegally using it to have sex with prostitutes. People's homes have been confiscated because their kids or tenants have been selling drugs out of their room. Rental companies have lost their property because the people who rented it used it for smuggling, even though the company wasn't even a suspect. Basically you can get robbed without any fourth amendment protection, it's insane.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Asset forfeiture? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      so what if they shut down a full office building just to get one small office that is violating the law.

  22. That's government for you by mi · · Score: 1

    When you keep your data in the cloud, and don't keep backups on hand, you're at the mercy of the powers to be

    Indeed. And the even bigger picture here is that the Government — the single biggest "power that is" — is the primary source of problems. Every interaction with it — be it the TSA agents, the police (even if they aren't after you), the DMV, a hospital, or even the Post Office — carry a high risk of being unpleasant if not outright horrifying. Having an uneventful encounter with these officials is the surprise, not the other way around.

    Folks demanding, government takes over this or that are either idiots or hope to profit personally without being subject of the takeover themselves.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  23. Re: Thanks, Obama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave em alone. He Dint Doo Nuffin