University of California IT Workers Replaced By Offshore Outsourcing Firm To File Discrimination Lawsuit (computerworld.com)

The IT workers from the University of California's San Francisco campus who were replaced by an offshore outsourcing firm late last year intend to file a lawsuit challenging their dismissal. "It will allege that the tech workers at the university's San Francisco campus were victims of age and national origin discrimination," reports Computerworld. From the report: The IT employees lost their jobs in February after the university hired India-based IT services firm HCL. Approximately 50 full-time university employees lost their jobs, but another 30 contractor positions were cut as well. "To take a workforce that is overwhelmingly over the age of 40 and replace them with folks who are mainly in their 20s -- early 20s, in fact -- we think is age discrimination," said the IT employees' attorney, Randall Strauss, of Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer. The national origin discrimination claim is the result of taking a workforce "that reflects the diversity of California" and is summarily let go and is "replaced with people who come from one particular part of the world," said Strauss. The lawsuit will be filed in Alameda County Superior Court.

Comments

And yet...

[msauve]

It's quite obvious that the reason was to lower costs, not because they specifically wanted younger workers from some foreign land. That's not age or national origin discrimination. The only argument to make it so would be if they failed to offer the previous employees an opportunity to keep their jobs, but at pay competitive with the new employees.

And they almost certainly didn't make that offer, so here's a sincere wish of good luck with the lawsuit.

Re:And yet...

[raftpeople]

The interesting thing is that a defense of "lower costs" becomes a problem if the new workers are H1B.

Re:Fiduciary duty

[lupinetine2896]

I agree, outsource all the professors and facilities staff too. Even cheaper, no buildings or classes. Best value: $20 gets your name printed on the degree of your choice. I mean, it's cheaper, they'd be doing their fiduciary duty, and the student gets a degree. Learning is, at best, ancillary to the sober work of cutting costs.

That's actually debateable

[rsilvergun]

the CEOs of the outsourcing firms have been caught a few times complaining about lazy Americans. And frankly he's right. By Indian or Chinese standards our 50-60 hour work weeks make us lazy. The H1-Bs I know regularly put in 80 hour work weeks. They're young and disposable but they don't care because currency exchange means they're earning a fortune working here. Best case they get a greencard and start doing the 50-60 hr work weeks of Americans, worst case they go back home flush with cash.

The moral? You can't compete with India. You can't compete with a country that has a literal cast system and effective slavery for millions of their citizens. End the H1-B program. Start calling your congressman/woman/thing and ask them why they haven't ended the program. There are other programs for rural doctors. The program is for replacing Americans. Call your congressman and ask. Remind them you and your family and your friends won't be voting for them in their primary. Make sure you say primary. They've gerrymandered the districts. After their Primary they'll win. But they're vulnerable in the primary.

Re:That's actually debateable

[Anonymous Coward]

I am an American. I work in Mainland China. I have worked in Dubai with a mostly Indian staff. I actually work with many nationalities, and I am connect to many organizations just like mine. That means, the company I work at, is connected regionally in China to at least 30 others that are collaborating. Each collaborative partner has a similar structure with a few western staff mixed with Chinese staff. In every case, without exception, we out perform the Chinese staff 3-1 and sometimes 4-1 in terms of work hours and project completion. I do work 60-70 hours to finish a project, a Chinese colleague will not do that without pressure from 3-4 higher level people. They have to be coerced.

A Chinese colleague will be at work for 40 hours a week; but in an 8 hour day they only work about 5 hours. The rest is invested in the social expectations, eating, napping, etc. Many will have 5-7 out of office tea/coffee breaks. One of our division leaders complains because 50% of her staff use the bathroom every 20-30 minutes due to the massive amount of liquids they intake.

These behaviors are all fine, as they are culturally expected and acceptable. For me, these behaviors are not expected and my supervisors are not Chinese so I cannot indulge in the down time. This same behavior is observable and testable in every company in Shanghai. Some "start-up" spaces in Shanghai are very cool and fully open from the street. When you look in during the day, many people will be asleep. This does not mean they might not invent something amazing, or they lack intelligence, but at 10:00 am seeing a start-up asleep, and then leaving at 5:00 pm always surprises me.

I do make more money than most of my counterparts, and I knew the situation before arriving. I took the job because it allows me to work on really interesting things, invest 2-3 years maximum and then move to something new, and make more of a living than I could in the USA. The output from western staff is high, but we turn over quickly, so the HR investment is not too excessive.

I have seen projects Chinese staff have let linger for 1-2 years, and I was able to finish them in a month. They have very little sense of urgency because they value their families and non-work life more than the work life. There are exceptions. Mainland Chinese who have the true entrepreneurial drive work circles around their peers, collect invest rapidly, and build businesses rapidly. They will always become the big fish very quickly, and people will follow them in sheer amazement.

I am in Mainland China, my experiences in Hong Kong are quiet the opposite, but the wages there for local workers are higher than the mainland, so there are less people like me doing these jobs. Not all Chinese people are the same, and expectations from country to country are very different.

Dubai was much worse than China. I have to say I witnessed work culture there that was destructive. People literally watching things melt down at 3:45 PM and going home at 4:00 PM because they were allowed.

I could never do anything like that, and I was always the one putting the stress on myself to stay and fix things. The waste and abuse of resources was rampant, and like China, the re-work rate on many projects would be 100%.

I watched facility construction, destruction, and re-construction too often, and could never understand the complete lack of ownership or pride in a project. These were engineers who were actually making a high salary and often out ranked me. However, again, Americans often ended up leading projects that were new and required aggressive strategies, self motivation, and hours of overtime. Had the company set the expectation that everyone needed to be self-motivated problem solvers, I would say only the western staff would have been able to meet that standard. More often than not, the expectation for the non-western staff was they were waiting to be "told", and anyone making a request had to do so through the proper channel. There was no teamwork really unless a western pers

Re:Fiduciary duty

[fluffernutter]

You are underscoring the very heart of this issue. Why is only one industry a candidate for this legal replacement? H-!B should be open to all professions or not at all. Also there should be a set amount of H-!Bs available at every salary level, including executive/administrative.

Financial punishments are not enough

[zerofoo]

The law prohibits using the H-1B visa to replace American workers with foreign workers.

Put a few decision makers in prison and watch how fast this stops.

I know you're just trolling

[rsilvergun]

but it's not poor Indians coming over here. It's their middle class. Somebody might read your BS comment and think there's something to it and that would be worse than useless. You're not hurting Indian tech workers by making them stay in India. Not very much anyway. Now, that's not to say their country isn't a hell hole that could use improvement. But the thing is, let _them_ fix it. Not because I'm being as ass, but because they're their countries Middle Class. They're the only ones with any power to effect change. The poor can't. It's all they can do to survive (many don't). The rich won't. They like slave labor. That leaves the Middle Class. They have a responsibility to their country and right now they're shirking it.

questionable

[superwiz]

HCL may be India-based, but it's going to be hard to prove that this is offshoring. HCL has a lot of US operations. It's practically a subsidiary of Microsoft in the US, in fact. They definitely employ a lot of people in the US. So they may be able to pass it off as simply outsourcing rather than offshoring of their operations. It's going to come down to personal accounts of who were the replacements whom the laid-off workers were training. If they are US residents, this isn't likely to go anywhere.

Re:questionable

[superwiz]

Just saw that they were also going for age discrimination. This should be a much easier to prove. I am not sure why IT workers don't sue for age discrimination more often, actually. It's rampant.

They forgot the first rule of outsourcing

[Trogre]

The first rule of outsourcing:

Don't.

LOL

[ArchieBunker]

You think the cost savings was passed onto the students? Oh that's a good one.

Re:Fiduciary duty

[rtb61]

Don't like what the University of California is doing, no problem, bag it, rag on it, grind it's reputation to dust. The charge to much, their degrees are shit, the professors abuse students, the facilities are horrible, make them spend ten times as much as they saved on countering negative publicity. Hate what they did, let them feel that financial pain. Don't forget they have no pretty much abandoned to privacy of their students to a foreign contractor. Why would any business trust them with research when a foreign outsourcing contractor now controls access to those secrets. Doing research, a new thesis, a major book, well, now all you work is open to foreign entities, your secrets up for sale (don't think so, think how much they are worth and how much and underpaid H1B can sell the for, especially compared to the sub-standard wage). Research Universities want to open up the network security to foreign 'FOR PROFIT' entities, well, it's major emergency time to shift all the research, delete the data and all backups, otherwise you will see a foreign company suddenly releasing that research et al as their own.

You want to know exactly how I would spy on a country, fill it full of espionage agents pretending to be cheap H1B labour, all operating independently upon seize opportunities as they come up and there will be major rewards for success (no comms leaks, no conspiracy links, just take your chances for major rewards, part ownership of the secrets obtained and passed on, and wow, is US security leaky as across the board and it is just starting to get really bad, some have been there for a quite a while, good luck). By secrets I mean every single kind, industrial, financial, extortion, everything of value and the agents work until they have build up sufficient 'er' investments to retire back home.

Socially Shame the Management

[Anonymous Coward]

Going Anonymous because I am deep in the industry and don't need my name associated to this comment.

You are not going to beat these organizations in court and walk away with just compensation. The lawyers will win big and the workers will end up getting the equivalent of a coupon to Red Lobster out of the settlement. Their names are forever stuck in a Google search showing they sue employers.

If you really want to stop outsourcing in America, you need to socially punish the managers that advocate and those that are close to them (family and friends). Publish their names online with their Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, Instagram, and Linkedin accounts. Inform their friends and family who are linked to them that it would be in their best interest to "unfriend/unfollow" them or they will be caught up in the social shaming for supporting the perpetrator. Faceless corporations and colleges are not replacing workers, human beings are. Identify those human beings and magnify their actions for the public to see. Pressure their relationships to follow suit or they will suffer the social shame as well. Make a personal cost for the activity at an individual level. (Rule #13)

Make the practice of screwing Americans hurt in the social arena in addition to having their family and friends shun them. If you really want to solve this overnight, hand over the names of Americans outsourcing jobs to H1-Bs to the weaponized autists of 4chan.

Re:Inherent contradictions within leftist ideals.

[harperska]

The same thing can be said of conservatism, or libertarianism, or any political philosophy for that matter. Adherence to a political philosophy as ones primary approach to life is inherently rooted in emotion rather than logic regardless of the philosophy in question.

Your singling out of liberalism as the one philosophy as the only one rooted in emotion indicates a clear conservative bias on your part.