Slashdot Mirror


NSA Halts Collection of Americans' Emails About Foreign Targets (nytimes.com)

The NSA is stopping one of the most disputed forms of its warrantless surveillance program (alternative source), one in which it collects Americans' emails and texts to and from people overseas and that mention a foreigner under surveillance, NYTimes reports on Friday citing officials familiar with the matter. From the report: National security officials have argued that such surveillance is lawful and helpful in identifying people who might have links to terrorism, espionage or otherwise are targeted for intelligence-gathering. The fact that the sender of such a message would know an email address or phone number associated with a surveillance target is grounds for suspicion, these officials argued. [...] The N.S.A. made the change to resolve problems it was having complying with special rules imposed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in 2011 to protect Americans' privacy. For technical reasons, the agency ended up collecting messages sent and received domestically as a byproduct of such surveillance, the officials said.

48 comments

  1. But... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    ...only to replace it with three programs that are five times worse.

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just more Five Eyes bullshit.

      Oh we're totally not reading our own citizen's emails. We only spy on the other countries. But maybe Britain is reading your emails, and maybe Britain has a treaty with us where they automatically share that sort of thing. So maybe we have all your emails to read anyway, but it's not like we were spying on you. It's just this weird treaty thing.

    2. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Pure BS. Now under 12333.

    3. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just more Five Eyes bullshit.

      Oh we're totally not reading our own citizen's emails. We only spy on the other countries. But maybe Britain is reading your emails, and maybe Britain has a treaty with us where they automatically share that sort of thing. So maybe we have all your emails to read anyway, but it's not like we were spying on you. It's just this weird treaty thing.

      No maybe about it. Most people reading this article know about this already. The agreement is called the UK USA agreement. The 5 eyes include the UK, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Just this week I read about what looked like a very similar agreement with Japan. Don't move along plenty more to see here. Thank you for raising the issue.

    4. Re:But... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Include the date this program started...1945. Truth is it started earlier, but was formalized after the end of WWII.

      I first heard rumors of the phone metadata database in the mid 1980s. At the time it was accepted, by those considered paranoid at the time, that the NSA had mapped relationships to the extent they knew anybody you had _ever_ repeatedly called on the phone. Granting it was noisy data at the time, phones to people not being as one to one as they are today.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:But... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Actually Britain stumbled across the Trump-Russia connections and considered Trump's collusion a threat to their own national security. They repeatedly sent the information to the American government but were frustrated because the Obama administration dragged its feet on the issue.

    6. Re:But... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      ... and better hidden. The NSA does not think its immoral acts were the problem, it thinks getting caught was the problem. They are, as so many people, completely unaware of history.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  2. Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And considering that they were copying this shit for YEARS before they were "found out", what's the likelihood that they're "really" going to stop?

    1. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And considering that they were copying this shit for YEARS before they were "found out", what's the likelihood that they're "really" going to stop?

      No, back when one had to explain what the Internet was before continuing a story; we
      were aware of the 8 words that would get your message routed to NSA. I forget all but the word Nuclear now.

      I've always posted as if it would be read by unknowns, or even appearing on the front page of the local paper.

        -Trax3001bbs

    2. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And considering that they were copying this shit for YEARS before they were "found out", what's the likelihood that they're "really" going to stop?

      No, back when one had to explain what the Internet was before continuing a story; we
      were aware of the 8 words that would get your message routed to NSA. I forget all but the word Nuclear now.

      I've always posted as if it would be read by unknowns, or even appearing on the front page of the local paper.

        -Trax3001bbs

      What's really amusing is how may of them overlapp with the 14 words to make somone fall in love with you forever.

  3. Thank you President Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doing what Obama couldn't (or wouldn't)

  4. Sure, they did. by Scutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe them 100% because they've never lied to the public before. Or the courts. Or Congress. Why wouldn't you take them at their word?

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Sure, they did. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I believe them. I believe that they will stop collecting and archiving these emails.

      I don't for a moment believe that they wont:
      a) continue scanning everything you do
      b) have ISPs and Telecom companies hold the emails *ahem* metadata for years to come
      c) continue the process of sending NSA letters with no oversight to targets who have no say in their privacy.

    2. Re:Sure, they did. by zlives · · Score: 1

      its funny how that works when its the people in power whose emails are caught this way and all of a sudden they too agree with Snowden. so maybe they do mean it this time.

    3. Re:Sure, they did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we know they're using that funny definition of "collected" they like to use: ie, they still download and backup everyone's emails, but only consider them "collected" if a human reads it. It's so super honest of them!

      Think about it: they're going to stop collecting emails...that mentions someone under surveillance. ...how do they know what the mail says if they didn't collect it already? They're going to decide, not to "collect" them based on their private internal contents?

      I could have this wrong, but my understanding is: they backup everyone's emails, then grep through them for keywords and if they get it hit, read it and consider it "collected".

      The bright side is, the pressure we're putting on them is working. Giving us little token victories is better than nothing. Keep it up and we could have some things to really celebrate about in the future. Like accountability and oversight.

    4. Re:Sure, they did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe trump ordered them to stop because they were also siphoning and collecting evidence that may be used against him?

    5. Re:Sure, they did. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Of course I believe them because I can see exactly what they are doing. They will pay private corporations for that data, giving those private corporations and incentive to collect all digital data and store all digital communications because low and behold they can sell it to the government, whilst the government claims it is not doing it, nuh uh. The arse holes are just making it legal for private corporations to do it, lead by M$ and Windows anal probe 10 and now the ISPs (Invasive Sellers of Privacy) and Google and all of the rest. Fucking arse holes in a corrupted government and in control of extremely corrupt corporations, what a fucking mess the millennials will be stuck with. Strict privacy laws, data audits and severe custodial sentences for those who break privacy laws upon a mass scale. This shit has to stop. Don't support the corporate political party, don't be surprised when you become unemployable, not just private but also government, when you can get credit, when you can not take public transport and when you entire family is similarly targeted.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  5. Who gets credit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least Obama got this one right, right? Wait, what?

  6. Donald Trump is covering his tracks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is really no valid reason to remove this aspect of surveillance of foreign targets. If you communicate with a foreign power under NSA surveillance, that information should be collected if only to be later discarded.

    1. Re:Donald Trump is covering his tracks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) once it has been collected, it stays collected. Nobody EVER does spring cleaning on this shit. If the shit doesn't get dumped then it can be used against the citizens "later". It never should have been allowed to begin with.

      2) The NSA considers it as "communicating with a foreign power" when Google stores your emails in Canada, whether you've actually communicated with someone overseas or not.

      There is ZERO reason for them to copy any data unless they're copying it FROM the far side. They don't get to take shortcuts just because it's "easier".

    2. Re:Donald Trump is covering his tracks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is ZERO reason for them to copy any data unless they're copying it FROM the far side" - Bullshit. The fact that Americans attempt to communicate with foreign targets is of direct interest to the intelligence services. If you're afraid about privacy you need to find alternate methods of subterfuge, such as sending Carter Page to Russia directly as your stooge.

    3. Re:Donald Trump is covering his tracks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you post this on a site viewable in nearly every country? Presto, that's communicating with a foreign target. This also applies when you're using an Internet backbone line that goes across international borders, which means pretty much all email providers and CDNs. Do you even know how the modern Internet works?

    4. Re:Donald Trump is covering his tracks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Presto, that's communicating with a foreign target" Wrong. They're collecting information SENT TO THE TARGET, not sweeping the entire internet for everything that the target might see. You're 100% bullshit on that.

  7. LIARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LIARS LIARS
    'nuff said :)

  8. Collecting all those redundant emails had to cost by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Why should the NSA collect a second copy?

    The copy they collected from all American's email should be sufficient.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Suuuure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, they are reuniting the koreas, forge peace between palestine and israel and solve the climate chance (pre-trump edition) problem...

  10. Only collecting .... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... e-mail to/from foreigners relating to surveillance targets.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  11. We don't believe you by Chronus1326 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We don't believe you

  12. Had this been something bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had this been something bad, the headline would have started "Trump's NSA..."

  13. Keep dreaming by markdavis · · Score: 2

    Laws and policies will not stop erosion of privacy by government or big business. Why? Because they really aren't accountable to anyone, and whistle-blowers get into severe trouble.

    If something CAN be done, then it is likely it WILL be done... especially if it one or more of these:

    * Cheap
    * Easy
    * Important to them
    * Has precedence
    * Already being collected

    It is like a microphone in a device- The way to ensure privacy isn't to list all kinds of rules and laws and disclosures, it is to put a hard switch on it so the user has the option to turn it off.

    Freedom and privacy shouldn't be exclusively to trying to limit what we DO with the information once it is collected. The only real way to ensure you are not being tracked is to prevent the collection of information in the first place. The only sure way to know a license plate scanner isn't being used improperly is to not use them, or limit the scope of how they are used. The only way to know cameras aren't tracking you is to not have cameras everywhere. The only way to know people can't potentionally abuse your messaging is to have encryption that can't be broken and without back-doors.

    1. Re:Keep dreaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The erosion of privacy will continue regardless since what is "reasonable" changes with the introduction of new technology. A constitutional change or clarification is in order. Also, a constitution should not be viewed as only negative, that is limiting, but also a positive law. This relates to the regulation and legislation the government should make to ensure the constitutional protections of the citizens are upheld and realized even in the contexts of the private. But that's the horrible European socialism you can't possibly have.

    2. Re:Keep dreaming by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Also, a constitution should not be viewed as only negative, that is limiting, but also a positive law. This relates to the regulation and legislation the government should make to ensure the constitutional protections of the citizens are upheld and realized even in the contexts of the private. But that's the horrible European socialism you can't possibly have."

      Indeed we are not European. The Constitution of the United States of America limits the powers of government; that it its sole purpose. All rights of the people are inherent, not granted.

    3. Re:Keep dreaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed we are not European. The Constitution of the United States of America limits the powers of government;

      The proclamations of the style of the US declaration of independence are integrated into European constitutions directly, without a separate document. I don't know how much the US case-law is referring the said Declaration as a "soft" source though.

      All rights of the people are inherent, not granted.

      It's actually interesting how the inherent human rights and the constitutional rights intersect. Due to the international agreements, that intersection has become smaller recently here in Europe.

  14. Trump by krisbrowne42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am certain this is only because it exempts them from having to programatically exclude Trump and his deplorables, giving them plausible deniability when the eventual investigation asks what they knew when.

    1. Re:Trump by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      While I don't believe for a second that the NSA is going to stop collecting ANYTHING, if it does happen to be true I really don't care WHAT motivation is behind innocent citizens being spied on less, as long as innocent citizens are spied on less.

  15. aside from typical remarks I have one insight here by CaptnCrud · · Score: 1

    ...if you have a government service that has so much eroded public support and trust to the point that no one believes anything they say about their own policies (even the potus)....then it might be time to restructure or close shop and start from scratch. There is some poison in that establishment that is going to take a wrecking ball to correct I think....

    If it was so valuable to them, why was it hard to come up with some form of metric to prove its worth?

  16. once more with the missing quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA is "stopping" one of the most disputed forms of its warrantless surveillance program ...

    National security officials have argued that such surveillance is "lawful" and "helpful" in identifying people who might have links to "terrorism", espionage or otherwise are targeted for "intelligence-gathering". The fat that the sender of such a message would know an email address or phone umber associated with a surveillance target is grounds for "suspicion", these officials argued. [...] The N.S.A. made the "change" to "resolve" problems it was having "complying" with special rules imposed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in 2011 to protect Americans' privacy. For "technical reasons", the agency ended up collecting messages sent and received domestically as a "byproduct" of such surveillance, the officials said.

    Hope that clarifies matters.

  17. we used to, BUT WE DON"T anymore by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "We used to, but we don't anymore." - I actually had an NSA employee say that to my face in 1980 - how many more times have I heard it in the media since? This is just another one ...cm

  18. WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE! by ComputerInsultant · · Score: 1

    Really. If we stop collecting this important data, WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!

    --
    engineers are all basically high-functioning autistics who have no idea how normal people do stuff
  19. 2 choices and the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A: Our disks are full and we can't be bothered, besides you have nothing new to say.

    B: Too busy cleaning up what we have on current officials to collect anymore.

    and the alternative reading....which seems more likely....

    We will be collecting emails that meet ANY of those criteria instead of ALL those criteria.

  20. It doesn't matter who is president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intelligence agencies will continue do their job and like any big bucks occupation, treat it like an enterprising business, this business being collecting as much data as possible. Now I wonder who else does this...Facebook? Google? Microsoft? Remember, anything and everything you do on a network, neutral or not, contributes towards your digital fingerprint. This fingerprint, along with AI and cloud computing, will destroy any privacy you have and make encryption useless. The reason the NSA or any agency you can pull out of a hat will be quieting operations is because they don't need to anymore; your ISP can just sell your browsing history to them and at a much cheaper rate than it would cost to pay employees and be 100% legal and no warrants needed.

  21. Re:But... under Section 702 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not even as dissipated as that. You have to read carefully.

    The National Security Agency is instituting several changes in the way it collects information under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

    In other words, these activities may continue under a different section of the FISA or under another entirely different law (or executive order). However, they will no longer be gathering this information under section 702.

  22. Self interest by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    This is like his tax cut plan- his refusal to release his own tax returns while pushing for tax "reforms" strongly indicates that the cuts are designed to lower his own taxes.

    Trump obviously doesn't care about an American's emails being read unless the American is him or one of his employees. While I may like the result in this case, I seriously doubt he'd be implementing this policy if it didn't benefit himself.

    1. Re:Self interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump obviously doesn't care about an American's emails being read unless the American is him or one of his employees.

      We don't want to risk inadvertently catching any (more) of Trump's staff committing treason. It is embarrassing.

  23. There's a bit more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They left out the final phrase in that sentence:

    "...and we will again!"