Slashdot Mirror


Taser Will Use Police Body Camera Videos 'To Anticipate Criminal Activity' (theintercept.com)

Presto Vivace quotes a report from The Intercept: With an estimated one-third of departments using body cameras, police officers have been generating millions of hours of video footage. Taser stores terabytes of such video on Evidence.com, in private servers to which police agencies must continuously subscribe for a monthly fee. Data from these recordings is rarely analyzed for investigative purposes, though, and Taser -- which recently rebranded itself as a technology company and renamed itself "Axon" -- is hoping to change that. Taser has started to get into the business of making sense of its enormous archive of video footage by building an in-house "AI team." In February, the company acquired two computer vision startups, Dextro and Fossil Group Inc. Taser says the companies will allow agencies to automatically redact faces to protect privacy, extract important information, and detect emotions and objects -- all without human intervention. This will free officers from the grunt work of manually writing reports and tagging videos, a Taser spokesperson wrote in an email. "Our prediction for the next few years is that the process of doing paperwork by hand will begin to disappear from the world of law enforcement, along with many other tedious manual tasks." Analytics will also allow departments to observe historical patterns in behavior for officer training, the spokesperson added. "Police departments are now sitting on a vast trove of body-worn footage that gives them insight for the first time into which interactions with the public have been positive versus negative, and how individuals' actions led to it." But looking to the past is just the beginning: Taser is betting that its artificial intelligence tools might be useful not just to determine what happened, but to anticipate what might happen in the future.

76 comments

  1. Axon AI detected first post will be useless by slazzy · · Score: 0

    It works!!

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
  2. Public Will Use Policy Body Camera Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "To Anticipate Ass Whoopings And Random Unnecessary Shootings (murders)"

    1. Re: Public Will Use Policy Body Camera Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. Facial recognition has a horrible time with Black people.

    2. Re: Public Will Use Policy Body Camera Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they all look alike?

    3. Re: Public Will Use Policy Body Camera Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if that ever mattered. The correlations wll be ez..

  3. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only see this going well...

    1. Re:Hmm by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can integrate this camera into a smart gun that automatically selects between lethal and non-lethal modes based on the how threatening the target appears...oh wait...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Hmm by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

      ... gun that automatically selects between lethal and non-lethal modes based on the how threatening the target appears...

      Yeah, it looks at skin tone.../s

      // 1984 is just a few decades late.

  4. Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and so it starts...

    1. Re: Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the minority report comments starts...

    2. Re: Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the combing through old videos, you could say that it's.... Postcrime.

    3. Re:Minority Report by Tungbo · · Score: 1

      More like Person of Interest...

  5. Yep, LOTS of possibilities by markdavis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >"But looking to the past is just the beginning: Taser is betting that its artificial intelligence tools might be useful not just to determine what happened, but to anticipate what might happen in the future."

    Yep. And by tying in facial recognition and other AI, it will be possible to make all kinda of inferences and connections and store all kinds of data about what normal citizens are doing. Things that might have nothing to do with the reason they were interacting with the police. Tracking where people are/go, who they associate with, what they are wearing, what they might be carrying with them, what was in their vehicle, what was written on their hat, etc. Lots of possibilities that can be great for crime fighting and a nightmare for privacy and freedom...

    And before someone says "but you have no expectation of privacy in public", I will counter with "but at no time in history was it possible to have perfect video and audio recollection of everything that is happening that could be stored indefinitely, shared with anyone, and analyzed and interpreted in a zillion ways."

    Truly a double-edged sword if ever there was one.

    1. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if AI starts making determinations or predictions based on race? Will it be shut down?

    2. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Humanity is becoming lost in technology that they created.

    3. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should the public be worried about the privacy & freedom of rapists, robbers and the like? I mean, it's one thing to say that the cops shouldn't be able to dig up one person's life to find something they might be guilty of, but it's quite another to say that they have to bury their heads in the sand and avoid looking for criminals in broad daylight.

    4. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, they could be dead wrong about who is and is not going to commit a crime. This could lead to the police harassing innocent people.

      In fact, this thing could even be programmed to target dissidents, and use imaginary crimes as a defense.

      That WILL happen, mark my words

      Leave pre-crime to Phillip K Dick

      Captcha: Attempts

    5. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing most of the technology doesn't exist, is poorly conceived to the point of impossibility, and people will use it anyway just like they have with auto-profiling software... right up to the point where judges start throwing out whole cases because offloading bad decisions to software doesn't stop them being bad decisions.

      Reality isn't a fucking product and you can't train a deep learning network to recognise something as variable as 'a criminal action'. You can start with specific crimes, but good luck teaching it the uh specific prejudices about those crimes you don't know you expect it to have.

    6. Re: Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just wait until you get picked up for "looking like you might do something illegal"... Just as a precautionary measure.

    7. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genuinely inevitable, because what they're trying to create is an oracle and what they'll get is a fancy magic 8 ball.

      Fucking snake oil merchants everywhere these days.

    8. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >"Why should the public be worried about the privacy & freedom of rapists, robbers and the like?"

      Do you think these systems will be recording only rapists, robbers and the like? I suspect that at 90+% of the police interaction with the public results in no ticket, 98+% results in no arrest, and 99.5% in no charges (yep, I made up those numbers, but don't they sound reasonable?). There are a lot of innocent, normal people that will be caught up in this new web of surveillance. I don't think the bodycams are going to just erase everything that didn't result in a negative or law-breaking interaction. And even if that is what was claimed, how would we really know it is true?

    9. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Good thing most of the technology doesn't exist, is poorly conceived to the point of impossibility [...] but good luck teaching it the uh specific prejudices about those crimes you don't know you expect it to have."

      While this is true NOW, the real issue is that if the data is being stored, it can be analyzed with improved systems in 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, whatever. This is one of the main problems with the current mentality of just capturing everything and saving it. Storage systems get cheaper and cheaper and bigger and bigger. At some point, that data can be horribly abused.

      For an example, look at fingerprints. What was nearly impossible 30 years ago is now trivial. If your fingerprints are on record for ANY reason, you are being searched hundreds of times a day or more! Pretty much every time they run prints, they just sweep across the whole integrated database. This is going to start with DNA next...

    10. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "i can only see this being used against other people, and my criminal activities are of the kind that police don't recognise so i'm used to them passing me over. Plus i'm not a member of a minority group so i imagine this will give me an implicit advantage over people who are"

      Sure hope you're realllllly fucking rich, kiddo.

    11. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am previous anon coward.

      Lets just say that some of the technology doesn't work as advertised and all of it involves either a black box or smoke an mirrors. Plus, fingerprints are really easy to standardise... whereas human behaviour in a video is not so easy... and even so the FBI build massive dedicated clusters for fingerprint matching and can still only manage a national volume of about 10k operations per day, last i heard. increasing this number is hard, for fairly complex network and disk reasons. Those reasons are still present if you swap video for still images, and compounded by more complex processing requirements.

      What are the visual pre-indicators for criminality anyway, and how would an ML system acquire them? Any corpus produced by this without massive but extremely careful curation would be so horribly skewed as to be unusable in any practical way.

      That'll then be compounded by the fact that the LEO using such a tool will use it based on their training, and that training will likely be influenced by sales and marketing to mitigate image problems for the company and product... and considering we already get cases (rightly) thrown out based on the use of automation for tasks that would be illegal if performed by an officer (e.g. racial profiling etc)... well.

    12. Re: Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they'd arrest you if you've already done something wrong and are wanted, or use it to later identify you after you've done something wrong.

    13. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they find the highest-ranking FWM on the team and fire him for his obvious racism.

      The real question is what happens when they run out of those and the AI is still racially profiling.

    14. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    15. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by sheramil · · Score: 1

      And by tying in facial recognition and other AI, it will be possible to make all kinda of inferences and connections and store all kinds of data about what normal citizens are doing.

      Anyone who suffers from Resting Bitchface had better stay home. http://www.urbandictionary.com...

      "How do you know she is a witch?

      "She looks like one!"

    16. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the criminal can project a look that the police systems think is innocent it could lead to police going straight past robbers, muggers, rapists, terrorists and top posters.

    17. Re: Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how oppression works

    18. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it be shut down?

      Regardless, the whining from people will be hilarious.

    19. Re:Yep, LOTS of possibilities by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Why should the public be worried about the privacy & freedom of rapists, robbers and the like? I mean, it's one thing to say that the cops shouldn't be able to dig up one person's life to find something they might be guilty of, but it's quite another to say that they have to bury their heads in the sand and avoid looking for criminals in broad daylight.

      My my! A post that succeeds in both trolling liberal-minded people, and shilling for TLA's and corporations like Taser / Axon. That was very well done, Mister Asshole AC! Have you ever considered using your powers for good, rather than for evil?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    20. Re: Yep, LOTS of possibilities by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or arrest you for resisting arrest.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Great by wjcofkc · · Score: 0

    More YouTube videos of scared black people and children being tasked. Maybe this time we can get someone in a wheelchair Seriously though, can shit get anymore dystopian? Yeah, I suppose it can.

    "Officer. Am I being detained?" "It doesn't matter. My data analytics say your pointing a gun at me... Zap!"

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  7. Tazer Precrime unit! by killless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This will be great - just like precrime from Minority Report. Also software will be able to replace suspect face with a scary killer face and yelling "I will kill you!" to protect police integrity.

    1. Re:Tazer Precrime unit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should utilize the rage face meme.

    2. Re:Tazer Precrime unit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I LIED "No officer, I'm not carrying drugs"

  8. How do they know it's criminal? by chispito · · Score: 1

    How can they tell which bits are criminal and which are routine? Do they have access to accompanying reports?

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:How do they know it's criminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously anything the citizen is doing is criminal and anything the officers are doing is routine. Should be trivial to implement.

    2. Re:How do they know it's criminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very simple.

      If it's just been shot multiple times, it was about to be a criminal act.

      If it's ignored because you're eating, it's because it's just routine events.

    3. Re:How do they know it's criminal? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Color-detection?

    4. Re:How do they know it's criminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As funny as that is, it becomes immediately useless to an actual good cop.

  9. Yet another company loses its way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company which used to manufacture just tasers, has now expanded into software, and changed its name to 'axon'. It is losing its way. Sort of like how Westinghouse got out of the nuclear reactor business, and entered broadcasting.

    1. Re:Yet another company loses its way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      start with the S1W, end at CBS

      in reality, westinghouse has been in broadcasting much longer than reactors

  10. Odd are high... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that well see blooper reels of afro-americans getting tased because they were thinking about committing a crime. And odds are, they were.

  11. Stop resisting! by wjcofkc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stop resisting! Stop resisting! Stop resisting! Stop resisting!

    "But officer, I'm pulled over with the engine off and my hands are on the steering wheel while my seat belt is still on."

    "Forget that! My computer says you will attack me with a knife in under 30 seconds! Stop, resisting!"

    "But officer."

    Zap.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Stop resisting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing that happens is the Tazer device beeps; causing the startled officer to pull the trigger.

    2. Re:Stop resisting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, you're not advancing the discussion with such an asinine comment. If implemented correctly, your situation is impossible. It's kind of like being afraid of SDC because you're afraid if you yell AUTO! EMERGENCY STOP!, you'll hear. "Got it. Accelerate to one hundred. Confirmed." It's a stupid scenario you just invent to try to scare the shit out of everyone.

    3. Re:Stop resisting! by wjcofkc · · Score: 0

      It's called thinking long term.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    4. Re: Stop resisting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly though, is scenarios is more realistic than yours

    5. Re:Stop resisting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're failing to understand is that Anon up there's scenario is *exactly* the kind of thing that has been shown to happen. In fact it's one of the things body cameras were meant to help reduce the accusations of.

      We have countless examples - many of them on video - in the US of cooperative - sometimes even completely helpless - being brutalized under screams of "he's resisting" and "gun!".

      This only *doesn't* happen in police procedural shows. Most forces in major US cities are even willing to plant weapons on a victim just to help their pre-emptive-self-defense claims once the media gets wind of yet another death.

    6. Re: Stop resisting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly. Not to mention the statistic that all crimes appear to occur within a 12 hour window of visiting Dunkin Donuts...

    7. Re: Stop resisting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should just stop resisting, but we know they won't.

    8. Re:Stop resisting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, you're not paying attention. Parallel construction. Look it up. Tell me why, given the plunge toward pre-crime and the existing practice of planting evidence and other malfeasance from L.E.O.s, you think this is impossible? You're not advancing the discussion by discounting this outcome.

    9. Re:Stop resisting! by detley · · Score: 1

      Tazer: [menacingly] Please put down your weapon. You have twenty seconds to comply.
      Tazer: You now have fifteen seconds to comply.
      Tazer: You are in direct violation of Penal Code 1.13, Section 9.
      Tazer: You have five seconds to comply.
      Citizen: Help...! Help me!
      Tazer: Four... three... two... one... I am now authorized to use physical force!

      (My apologies to ED)

  12. omnicorp was a better name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a slippery slope you enter when you privitize justice...

    Remember i am wearing the red tag...

  13. Taser Will Use Cameras ( Score: -5, CivilRightsly) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    per orders of so-called U.S. Attorney General Jeff Saaayyyyyssssiiiioooonnnnnssss !

    Enjoy Bucketheads Against Trump

  14. by the police, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To anticipate criminal activity from the wearer, right?

  15. PLEASE PUT DOWN YOUR WEAPON. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU NOW HAVE TEN SECONDS TO COMPLY.

      I think you'd better do what he says....

  16. This is so bad oon so many levels... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    (I didn't read the entire summary because BeauHD seems to prefer the lack of paragraphs, instead presenting an undecipherable wall of text to the /. community. Hey, BeauHD, why don't you at least try to do some modicum of editing?)

    .
    But from the headline... now we have AI shooting energized probes at people. This is going to end up in a bad place.

  17. good! by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    Taser Will Use Police Body Camera Videos 'To Anticipate Criminal Activity' ...

    ... by police. That is, Taser should predict when a police officer is about to commit a crime or when he acts like a loose canon.

    1. Re:good! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> ... by police.

      I doubt that. Very much.

  18. Better idea. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Make it so that footage cannot be "lost" when it's an officer on trial.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  19. oh, California, where art thou? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Why shouldn't this invite a flurry of law suits from anyone who gets filmed by such a camera in California? It has some of the strictest copyright laws in the country. Seems like anyone in California should be able to sue Axon for using their video for financial gain without their consent.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  20. "Acts Nervous in the Presence of Police Officer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would almost certainly be one of the subroutines.

    After the software alerts them to every. damn. person. they. pass. in. the. street., the cops will be pulling off their body cams and flushing them down the toilet.

  21. Lawyer viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://blog.simplejustice.us/2017/04/23/short-take-do-you-agree-to-be-tased/

    If you don't use their product, your client sits in jail.

  22. can a court order get data off of private servers by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    can a court order get data off of private servers if the local cops stop paying and the defendant requests it at trial?? can that be used an as get out jail free card?

  23. Pro Cop Analysis by blackprint · · Score: 1

    Some disturbing language that indicates that they're analyzing from the perspective of the officer and presuming the individual did something to create a negative interaction. And having software automatically fill out your reports will be serving the client, police officers, and the last thing I want is for someone to find the most efficient language to paper over LEO mistakes. None of this sounds like it's going to be a benefit to citizens.

    1. Re:Pro Cop Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first cop-cams gave power back to the public. Which is why cops hated them.

      But it was inevitable that they would be re-purposed to increase police power. I've been saying for years that cop-cams should encrypt all recordings on the camera itself and the decryption keys should only be available with a warrant. But that won't happen because unrestricted access to all that data is just too seductive to the people in power.

      Cop-cams are going to turn every cop into a mobile surveillance unit. We've basically reached "peak accountability" for the police and are now sliding back down the far side of that hill.

  24. Sibyl, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surprised no 'nerds' commented about the impending Cybil system this will lead to, but oh well, can't expect that on slashdot anymore.

  25. "Pre-crime" report isn't the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it to the geeks here at Slashdot to miss the forest for the trees.

    The truly troubling aspect isn't that this project might lead to some kind of half baked "pre-crime" system. It's that the prospect of filling out paperwork is often the only thing keeping cops from pushing he envelope even further than they already do. The fact that cops typically have to fill out several forms every time they discharge their weapons has kept countless non-threatening suspects from being shot in the back or otherwise summarily executed or tortured.

    The prospect of a pain in the ass can be a real motivator when it comes to encouraging approproate restraint by law enforcement officersin the course of their duties. Do we really want to instead give them free reign to live out their cowboy fantasies of all action, all the time?

  26. When can i buy one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it can figure that out, im gonna use it to figure out when i can expect a beat down from the cops.

  27. A company that feeds at the trough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charges outrages prices for not much. And the unlimited ability to tax you to pay for it.
    Has cause your house taxes to um to ten times what they once were at the local level.

    Even fees that were once 15.00 for plates for your car are now 500.00 because of ricks like these.

  28. How can they use this to protect people? by fedos · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could analyze the video for signs that the cop wearing the body cam is about to murder someone.

  29. Doubling down by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    So Taser, an already highly creepy company of dubious ethics, has decided to become an even creepier company and is changing their name to help hide who they are?

    Sounds about normal.