Slashdot Mirror


Surface Laptop Can Be Switched To Windows 10 Pro For Free Until 2018 (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Don't let the new Windows 10 S operating system stop you from buying a Surface Laptop this year. The streamlined OS limits you to using applications that are in Microsoft's Windows Store. But, as noted in the tech specs for Microsoft's new ultraportable, if you'd rather run non-Store apps, you can switch to Windows 10 Pro for free until December 31, 2017. Once 2018 hits, the switch to Pro will cost $49. But be warned: Once you upgrade your license key, you can't go back.

150 comments

  1. Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anything not on the Appdows 10 Store is LUDDITE software, so only LUDDITES want LUDDITE Windows 10 Pro. Modern app appers only app apps, which is why Appdows 10 S is the appiest apperating app!

    Apps!

    1. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not probably.. The secondary storage on the Surface Laptop us amazingly quick and one of the reasons is because it is integrated into the motherboard. They say it is the first device of its kind to integrate the SSD in this way.

    2. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is all the crying about it not being user upgradable? Gamer dweebs won't be able to rice it out!

    3. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by TWX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Where is all the crying about it not being user upgradable? Gamer dweebs won't be able to rice it out!

      Also educational institutions that normally keep such devices for a long time won't find such a machine suitable for student use, as they won't be as readily able to repair or upgrade as needs change.

      Modularity is fairly important in devices assigned to kids. Devices are expected to suffer drops, harsh transportation, kids failing to remove USB components, etc. Ideally the external ports are on their own circuit boards connected via cables to the mainboard so that when the unit gets dropped with the AC adapter plugged in or with the USB flash memory plugged it, the inexpensive circuit board for that subcomponent can be replaced instead of having to replace the whole mainboard.

      With this mindset already in play, K12 also likes it when storage is modular. It means K12 can buy the storage that they see themselves need for the next few years, and if it turns out they need more storage it's a lot cheaper to spend $50/device to ugprade than it is to spend $500/device to replace them outright. With things like folder redirection and local caching that becomes an issue, as most users, be they students or staff, want the same access to their stuff whether on the organization's LAN or not.

      I get that as devices miniaturize it's increasingly harder to continue to be modular, but sometimes the need for modularity outweighs the desire for small form factor.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by technoid_ · · Score: 1

      We similar with phones. Feature phones got smaller and smaller and then with the coming of smart phones we are reversing direction and they are getting bigger and bigger.

      The difference between what was called a phablet and today's flagship phones is nil.

      I need something big enough to use comfortably more than I need something something small.

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do - Lew of GO magazine
    5. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Apple already solder on SSDs to the motherboard? Though "first device of its kind" may be narrowly defined such that this laptop is the first device of its kind anyway.

    6. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by dnaumov · · Score: 1

      What alternate reality do you live in where institutions buying/leasing devices by the thousands repair or upgrade ANYTHING?

    7. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Also educational institutions that normally keep such devices for a long time won't find such a machine suitable for student use, as they won't be as readily able to repair or upgrade as needs change.

      No educational institution upgrades devices. Most of them can barely afford a sys admin to keep the network going let alone someone to manage hardware. Education institutions have fallen over themselves to buy iPads and Chromebooks, and if you're in a nice enough school Macbook Airs and Surface Pros. "Upgrades" come in the form of renewed contracts with renewed devices, and given these devices get flung around in kids' schoolbags attrition is a perfectly valid way to upgrade an entire group relatively quickly.

      And that's only if the school or government pays for them. There are enough schools out there where the onus falls on the parents to buy the device which then ends up their property after the school is finished.

      Upgradability? Modularity? You're rattling off a tech head's wet dream of statistics, and nothing in relation to any education program that has ever been run.

    8. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple does solder SSDs as of the most recent models. I wish they would bother using 7200 RPM SSDs, since you are stuck with the drive for the life of the machine...

    9. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a single school cares about this. You clearly have no idea what schools want or do in practice.

      Warranty. Insurance. Parents pay excess on insurance for non-accidental damage.

    10. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      A spinning SSD? Won't it get dizzy?

    11. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who works in IT for a school district (laugh it up chuckleheads), the people who are actually in charge of deciding what device to buy don't know enough to not buy Surface RT's or Surface Pro 1,2,3,4....or whatever the next round of garbage is marketed our way. Buzz words and vendor lock-in are the strongest factors in the places that have been at this for awhile....and don't get me started on the new God Awful windows Cumulative updates......I'm headed to the fridge for a beer, anyone want one?

    12. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Now imagine going back in time where we still have square monitors .

      That's going to hurt when K12 kids managed to get it to drop from the table.

    13. Re: Only LUDDITES want Windows 10 Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, they do. In any organization of that size you'll find a storeroom full of stripped and cannibalized machines.

  2. too expensive by fred6666 · · Score: 2

    $1000 for 4 GB of non-upgradable RAM and a (probably) non-upgradable 128 GB SSD.

    1. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      It's only expensive if you're poor.

    2. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      4GB on a $1000 device? What is Microsoft thinking? That they too can sell overpriced underspecd gear now?

      They will be sued as Apple surely has this patented!

    3. Re:too expensive by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Their goal is to compete with Apple.
      They got the price, the locked down OS. Unfortunately, they weren't brave enough to remove the headphone jack.

    4. Re:too expensive by Gabest · · Score: 2

      It is expensive because you can get the same for half the price from Acer, Asus, Dell, etc.

    5. Re:too expensive by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      The 12.9" iPad Pro is $899 with 128GB of flash and 4GB of RAM and the keyboard is another $169, so they're in the same ballpark if they intend this as a high-end iPad competitor, rather than a laptop competitor.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:too expensive by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Please explain how Apple's laptop OS is "locked down"?

    7. Re:too expensive by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      We're talking about technology here, not religion.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:too expensive by nomadic · · Score: 1

      One advantage they have as the OS creator is they can optimize their laptop quite well (Apple gets the same advantage on their often weak technical specs). I have a Surface Pro 4 and its performance approaches my higher-CPU 16 gig RAM desktop.

    9. Re:too expensive by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Can you install it on non-Apple hardware?

    10. Re:too expensive by wed128 · · Score: 2

      There's a difference?

    11. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a SP3 and can say it feels slower than a core2duo... the SSD makes some tasks seem much smoother but the CPU is underpowered and hits a thermal wall really quick.

    12. Re:too expensive by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      Dell's XPS 2in1 is $999
      with 4gb
      and 128 SSD

    13. Re:too expensive by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Other than the fact that it does not run on non-Apple hardware (officially), how is macOS locked down? You can turn off SIP if you want to dance a jig in the system directories, and you can turn off signature checking of programs.

    14. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they don't intend to compete in the same market since iPad Pro is completely unusable.

    15. Re:too expensive by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Show us. No please, show us. Also pay attention to other specs like quality of screen, touch screen, weight, size. You get awarded no points for cherry picking.

    16. Re:too expensive by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That they too can sell overpriced underspecd gear now?

      What's underspecced about a device that will ultimately be used to process documents and browse the internet? If your goal is to play Doom 2016 on it, you're running a fools errand.

      Hell not being able to load it with that crap may actually be a plus for educational institutions. In the mean time find us some other devices with similar specs for a better price.

      Here's one now from Dell: http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop...
      It's $1 cheaper.

    17. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "$1000 for 4 GB of non-upgradable RAM and a (probably) non-upgradable 128 GB SSD"

      I'm sure you can get a similar laptop for half the price in the fantasy world you live in with your cartoon-girlfriend.

      I'm not sure about half price, but you can definitely get more for less. It's upgradable, too.

      ASUS: 8 GB RAM and 256 GB SSD and FHD 13.3" for $700

      Acer: 8 GB RAM and 256 GB SSD and FHD 15.6" for $580

    18. Re:too expensive by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's a bit like with education and legislation: Often there isn't, but there definitely should be.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be trying to compete with (Cr)apple to sell the most vastly overpriced, cheaply made crap on the planet!! Seriously 4Gb of ram and cannot be upgraded?! Only a 128Gb SSD?! My 7 year old Thinkpad has 8Gb ram and a 240GB SSD, and can probably run circles around this thing considering it runs Linux and doesn't have the Win10 spy-virus installed!

    20. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you step back an impartial look at the specs of the Surface laptop to other offerings in this price range, it doesn't actually fare too well. It has some nice features, but it also shows some important corners being cut. If you go compare it to a Macbook Air which carries the same price and similar specs, yes, this beats the Air in some categories, but it loses in others. That's just one example, but it's an Apple.

      This laptop is aimed at students and is competing against Apple. not just any Apple, but an Apple that looks almost identical. Apple carries a better resale value, a higher perceived value, and a better (perceived) support system. You may know that’s garbage, but someone walking into a store dragged by their kid who wants an Apple like the other kids at school doesn't.

      By the way,
      Go ask a car detailer how he/she feels about Alcantara It’s nearly impossible to clean and make it look right after any kind of wear. It’s kind of a joke among automotive people.

    21. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insanity or incompetence. I paid less for a Surface Pro 3 a few years ago that had better specs and actually has a full OS on it.

    22. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard you can download more ram, but only if you do so within the first 8 months or if you have a need for assistive technology that requires more than an amount of ram considered decent in 2004.

    23. Re:too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raspberry pi: $35

      pi 7" touch screen: $70

      64GB SD: $100 (on the high end)

      keyboard/mouse: $50

      case for pi/screen: $50

      raspbian: free

      total cost: Under $300

  3. And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And yet somehow, Slashdot readers will find a way to bash Microsoft for giving their customers this choice. It's clear that Microsoft is trying to do a good thing, but it will somehow be spun into a reason to criticize them. Microsoft can't win around here. No matter what they do, they will be wrong in the eyes of Slashdot readers.

    1. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I gave your mom the choice of taking it up the arse or in the mouth. She opted for both

    2. Re:And yet... by Khyber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "And yet somehow, Slashdot readers will find a way to bash Microsoft for giving their customers this choice"

      Considering what they're doing right now reeks exactly of what got them into trouble with the law in the first place (the web browser) I see no reason why Microsoft shouldn't get slammed.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:And yet... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      "And yet somehow, Slashdot readers will find a way to bash Microsoft for giving their customers this choice"

      Considering what they're doing right now reeks exactly of what got them into trouble with the law in the first place (the web browser) I see no reason why Microsoft shouldn't get slammed.

      They have learned to play the anti-trust game better and all relevant politicians have been politically donated to. Government power working as intended.

      Don't forget the EU pols in Brussels in addition to the national politicians! That was Google's goof a few yearz back.

      Before downmodding me as : Too Cynical For My Tastes, go learn history.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:And yet... by chispito · · Score: 1

      "And yet somehow, Slashdot readers will find a way to bash Microsoft for giving their customers this choice"

      Considering what they're doing right now reeks exactly of what got them into trouble with the law in the first place (the web browser) I see no reason why Microsoft shouldn't get slammed.

      How is it different than an iPhone, a Chromebook, or another walled-garden device?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:And yet... by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      the browser thing was and still is completely stupid.

    6. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And yet somehow, Slashdot readers will find a way to bash Microsoft for giving their customers this choice"

      Wrong! M$ 'bash'ed us with the Windows Subsystem for Linux! :)

    7. Re:And yet... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't we bash Microsoft for "giving customers this choice"? "We're going to install a locked down operating system whose choices are of questionable, if any, benefit to ordinary consumers, by default on our premium laptops, but you'll be able to choose to switch away!"

      So, in order to make the laptop useful, you have to make a choice: default, or useful? And after you've made that choice, you then wait an hour for your laptop to be set up. At least, I hope it's only an hour.

      What about, instead of giving users the choice, you just give them Windows 10 Pro? I mean, there's no reason to offer the choice: the market for Windows S is for a minority of users, mostly enterprises with no legacy requirements, and schools. And TBH, the fact the OS requires users to use Edge means it's almost certainly a no-go in either of those environments.

      Choices aren't always good. Choosing has a cost, all by itself. If offering a choice means most users will then have to wait an hour before their laptop is usable, then your offering of a choice is a bad thing - you should have just given them what they wanted to begin with.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:And yet... by unrtst · · Score: 1

      And yet somehow, Slashdot readers will find a way to bash Microsoft for giving their customers this choice.

      It's not very difficult... I'll give it a go.
      What "choice" were they given? Between Windows 10S or Windows 10 Pro? Really? That's supposed to be compelling? Think of any other choice that's that narrow, and it seems stupid: hot fudge sunday, or warm fudge sunday? Blue Ford F-150, or Black Ford F-150?

      It's clear that Microsoft is trying to do a good thing

      Saying it doesn't make it so. This isn't a "good" thing. FWIW, I don't think this is "bad", as in worse than not offering it, but it's not "good" in a moral way, which is how you phrased it. They're even charging for it, so it is by no means altruistic. The $49 wouldn't feel as much like a rip off if "Pro" still meant something, but even if it was a choice of the enterprise version, it's still not "good".

      I was hoping (but not holding my breath) to see the headline read:

      Don't let the new Windows 10 S operating system stop you from buying a Surface Laptop this year. If you'd rather run a non-Microsoft OS, you can easily do so via Microsofts answer to bootcamp, __________!

      If that bootcamp like solution only supported MacOS X, then I still wouldn't consider it much of a choice (like republican/democrat).
      If they also refund the OS license fee if you switch out the OS, then they would be trying to do a good thing (or just the right thing).

      But be warned: Once you upgrade your license key, you can't go back.

      See, how is this "trying to do a good thing"? I'm not sure why someone would want to go back, but why the hell wouldn't they allow it? Seems like that should be baked in and always possible (ie. let the user screw things up however they like, but flash to recovery and it restores the original Windows 10S), not locked out because you spent $49 to reclassify an identifier (the license key) from 10S to 10Pro.

      I'm sure this is welcome news to some folks who want ("need") to run certain programs that don't run on 10S, but it's far from a karma gaining action. They locked things down and took away choices first. They're now easing off slightly. One step forward and two steps back doesn't put them on the positive side of the equation. None of what I said above even begins to touch on any of the other big negatives (frequent defaults resets (ex. browser), telemetry, forced updates, cortana hard to disable, ads integrated into menus, ruined start menu, multiple places to configure settings, removal of dvd playback and other features on upgrade, unable to uninstall builtin programs, let alone all the FOSS complaints).

    9. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, from MS's position it looks like, (and is marketed), as a great deal. From a users' point of view this is equivalent to being served a common hot dog with no bun on a golden platter. But one can upgrade to the fine five course dinner if you wish.

      When people are handed a golden platter to begin with, (as the surface is touted to be "Oh So Elegant", well its OS should ALREADY be top notch- not a watered down 32bit junk heap, that one can excuse by saying "yes I'll accept the bothersome delay & steps to do an upgrade to a brand new piece of tech".

      TL;DR?
      No. MS deserves to get roasted for selling junk but offering an apologetic solution. Why not the fine solution first?

    10. Re:And yet... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's because you don't understand the law. How can someone be anti-competitive by locking down their device when they first enter a market? The differences between this and the IE/Netscape saga are night and day in the eyes of the law and also in the eyes of the effect on consumers and competition.

    11. Re:And yet... by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      Because this is not about choice. This is about conditioning the market to the removal of choice.

      If it was about choice, they would offer you the ability to select between S and Home. But instead S is the default, and the only path away is buying the upgrade to Pro. That means a lot of people who are locked in to the phone-like app store experience.

      If Microsoft is concerned about programs slowing the computer down by getting their own updates, they could have standardized an update system into the OS.

  4. The S is for by Revek · · Score: 1

    Shitty?

    1. Re:The S is for by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 1

      I went with Strongbad, The S is for Sucks.

  5. But....... by dr.Flake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    does it run Linux?

    Only really relevant question here

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    1. Re:But....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lol @ cheap ass windows hobbiests trying to act like apple users now... if windows users had money they wouldn't be windows users!

    2. Re:But....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have money and want to prove it the, right, a Mac is a wonderful choice. If you have money and you want decent specs then Macs are a great way to waste your money.

    3. Re:But....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    4. Re:But....... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, the 2% of the desktop/laptop world is the "only" relevant question here. /sarcasm

      Depends on what you mean by "linux". If you count Chromebooks, nobody is quite sure how many are being sold, but it's clearly not so insignificant.

      But of course by "linux" we usually don't mean the linux kernel surrounded by a proprietary userland and tied to proprietary network services; we mean a proper distro. But I know *I* have installed Linux on machines that are only used for browsing just to avoid the annoyance of Windows.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:But....... by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Ugh. How do you make those statements while quoting facts that, IMO, oppose the conclusion you have reached?

      2% of the desktop/laptop world (that runs linux) ... No one actually cares.

      2% may look small, but consider that MacOS X only has about 3%, and that 2% is almost certainly understated, and the total count is REALLY BIG (billions). We're talking about 10's or 100's of millions of devices, not counting VMs. That's a lot of potential customers, and this segment tends to carry some decision making weight elsewhere.

      (does it run Linux) is the "only" relevant question here. /sarcasm

      Here is slashdot. Here we have seen all the forced upgrade things Microsoft has done, and their history of anti-competitive behavior. Why shouldn't this be the first question? As in, when some new atrocity comes after 10S, will it be possible to ditch it and run something else on your own hardware? Feel free to replace "Linux" with some other non-Windows thing, but Linux runs damn near everywhere, so it's a great candidate to determine if the hardware can run anything besides what it shipped with.

      This laptop is targeted at the basic user who wants an ultra-light device but not a tablet ... You aren't the intended market segment at all

      How the hell do you jump from one to the other? You didn't say, "this laptop is targeted at people who can barely grasp usage of windows and notepad" or something like that... just an ultra-light device that is not a tablet. That very segment was, and still is, one of the strongest segments for Linux (ex. netbooks and chromebooks). This laptop is targeted directly at the segment that wants to stick Linux on it, but is doing everything it can to make that somewhere between difficult and impossible, rather than embracing it and those customers (for that side, see Apple and bootcamp).

    6. Re:But....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because Windows 10 Pro comes with Hyper-V and that's how I'm running Linux on my system :P

    7. Re:But....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going from Linux or Windows to Apple is just like having a bad first date and going gay.

    8. Re:But....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's right call us faggots, when you're the one with Satya Nadella's fat Indian cock shafting you night and day.

  6. Why would anyone downgrade? by Higaran · · Score: 2

    I don't understand why anyone would want to downgrade from windows 10 pro back to the S version. Can someone enlighten me?

    1. Re:Why would anyone downgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only real case I can come up with is if someone who cannot be trusted to administrate their own computer (the entire sales department, some of your relatives, etc.) clicks the button, then your best option is to yell at them until 2018 and buy them a new one that they won't upgrade.

    2. Re:Why would anyone downgrade? by TWX · · Score: 1

      I had a netbook that had Windows 7 Starter Edition on it back in the day. Hell, still have it laying about somewhere. Anyway, as a device for simple web browsing and basic usage it was fine. It was annoying as hell that Microsoft wouldn't let you change the background picture on the desktop (a feature one could do on Windows 3.1 on a 386, so their excuse about computing power was bullshit) but even as someone that asks their computers to do more than most it still was adequate for what the platform was.

      I have no doubt that most people would be find with this version, they're not going into stores to buy software anymore and even if they're limited to Microsoft's own package repository ("store") it'll probably still be good enough for them.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Why would anyone downgrade? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      i would do it to my family members to reduce my support work.

    4. Re:Why would anyone downgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To repurpose, sell, or gift it. Flashing back to 10S would mean nothing outside the windows store could be installed, so it'd be fairly safe to pass on to someone else, or stick on your coffee table, etc. Look up all the justifications for 10S, and those are all the reasons someone would want to switch back to it.

    5. Re:Why would anyone downgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the reverse. One is allowed a free upgrade from the surface's native S up to the Pro version, not the reverse. The surface already comes with S.

    6. Re:Why would anyone downgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really are a bastard. Making your family use Edge? Makes me shudder just thinking about it.

  7. Why would anyone want a crippled laptop? by iamacat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And with the smallest app store in the industry on top? Many Chromebooks have a far greater selection of Android apps, plus you can sideload more and install competing Amazon appstore.

    1. Re:Why would anyone want a crippled laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ask chromebook users

    2. Re:Why would anyone want a crippled laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok-

      'Hey Chromebook users! Why would you want a crippled Win10 S laptop?'

      What? For a laugh? That's no answer!'

    3. Re:Why would anyone want a crippled laptop? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And with the smallest app store in the industry on top? Many Chromebooks have a far greater selection of Android apps, plus you can sideload more and install competing Amazon appstore.

      Many Chromebooks don't run Android Apps. Chromebooks were bloody popular before there was any talk of them running Android Apps. Also given what constitutes "computing" to a lot of people today (Gmail, writing a document in Office 365, uploading photos to the cloud) frankly for a lot of people "Apps" are completely optional.

    4. Re:Why would anyone want a crippled laptop? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The same reason people buy Apple or Google ready hardware. All they need is chat, the internet, social media, email, a webcam, productivity apps.
      MS is chasing the people who don't need Office applications.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Why would anyone want a crippled laptop? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Why another platform with less productivity apps though?

    6. Re:Why would anyone want a crippled laptop? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      I guess it is really a list of brands spying on the user. Who will a user feel like sharing with from the hardware up.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. It doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    >Don't let the new Windows 10 S operating system stop you from buying a Surface Laptop this year.

    It doesn'...t I have a shitload of other reasons not to buy it.

  9. This is what secure boot was designed for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They hook you in with a "free" upgrade, then down the line when you get your next computer they extort you to get an uncrippled version of Windows, which is needed for real applications. They will use the paywall to lock out competitors and secure boot will stop you getting the unlocked version for free. Its time to take action against Microsoft before the "S" becomes the default for all new computers.

  10. Copying Apple's mis-steps ..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Maybe this new Surface laptop will be a big seller? Way too early to predict that. Regardless? I view this one as copying all of the wrong things Apple has done lately.

    Basically, you've got Microsoft trying to compete on "thinnest, lightest!" (and for now, actually beating Apple at their own game in that department) - at the expense of functionality. You're always going to pay a premium price for hardware that's been crammed into as small a space as the manufacturer can possibly put it in ... hence the underwhelming specs; offering a model with only 4GB of non-expandable RAM and only 128GB of drive storage.

    The gimped edition of Windows 10 (even IF you can upgrade to the normal version at no charge for a limited time) is more evidence that MS realizes this thing costs more to build than it's really worth to a lot of people. (They've already laid out a "roadmap" for it that ensures once the early adopters have all bought theirs, they'll get to extract another $50 from each person after that who buys one expecting it to run a full-fledged Windows 10 OS.) That amounts to a way to keep the initial purchase price down and let people pay later for the whole Windows experience on it.

    (Even Apple hasn't stooped to that level. OS X is OS X on every Mac out there. There's no "Professional" edition, "Home" edition, or any kind of "Lite" version that only lets you run apps purchased in the App Store!)

    So many times, what I see people *really* wanting is a good, all-around portable computer with cutting edge graphics/GPU capabilities to go along with a good CPU. And right now, the industry still seems to have tunnel vision that only gamers would ever want such a thing. Just yesterday, an employee in our office got frustrated with slow performance doing "warp transform" processes on images in Photoshop on her PC. The Intel 4000 integrated graphics just weren't up to the task of handling that very well, even though her PC had good hardware specs in other areas.

    But if the main focus continues to be making all laptops as thin as possible, you're not going to have better graphics because they can't dissipate the heat OR put big enough batteries in them to power the higher end video chipsets.

    1. Re:Copying Apple's mis-steps ..... by torkus · · Score: 2

      Except you're confusing your limited cases with the broader industry.

      The large majority of people outside of gamers have no need for discreet graphics. Even on the occasions that something goes more slowly, the trade-off in cost/weight/size balances in favor of accepting the slowness.

      There certainly ARE laptops with discreet graphics. Nice ones too. But even so it's a niche market, costs more, and has other trade-offs. Manufacturers are going to focus on the masses by default.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    2. Re:Copying Apple's mis-steps ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a business laptop with a quadro or firepro video card.

  11. Shilling for M$ much by ugen · · Score: 1

    Yesterday trolling of Apple, then shilling for M$ laptops. I guess we know who paid for the current /. campaign.

    1. Re:Shilling for M$ much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think the "ms" in "msmash" stands for? They've been nothing but a flamebaiter since day one and the comment section of just about any story they post prove how much of a bottomfeeder they are.

  12. A solution without a problem by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Surface laptop fills a niche that has a very small userspace inside the Surface lineup and, more importantly, breaks almost zero new ground (save for the super-soft keyboard surface that is a pita to clean). It doesn't fold flat/back so inking isn't really as useful as on the other two Surface portables. You can't get it with a second, discrete GPU like you can with the Book. It's heavier and lower resolution than the Pro4. It's only real claim to fame is a very suspect 14.5 hour "video playback" benchmark which, I'm going to guess, is based on the CPU being in a near-sleep state while the playback is completely decoded in the new Kaby Lake HEVC circuit. There are no specs on the battery because if we know the Wh, we could back out the high power profile time (Wh/15W GPU for most serious work, about double that for light web surfing, maybe 2.5x with Edge).

    Similarly equipped, the SL costs within $100 of the SP4 and SB. That seems like a small differential to give up the ability to go tablet mode.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:A solution without a problem by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Similarly equipped, the SL costs within $100 of the SP4 and SB.

      This is one I don't understand but it does seem to address one of the complaints about the Surface line, which was that it isn't hinge supported (i.e. very difficult to use on your lap).

    2. Re:A solution without a problem by mattmarlowe · · Score: 1

      Unsure of the pricing Surface Laptop versus Pro 4 on higher end models, at launch the SP4 i7/16GB/512GB was around $2,700 and the similarly configured Surface Laptop seems to be around $2,100.... Unless one is getting the performance base, there isn't much advantage to the dedicated GPU in upgrading to a SB - the intel IRIS pro gpu in the SP4 is relatively fast....not sure about the new builtin GPU of the surface laptop (i7 variant).

    3. Re:A solution without a problem by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A nice new Linux install will solve all the MS Windows phone home issues. Some nice new hardware with an almost classic Thinkpad like screen ratio.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Surface is a failure by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't believe the hype: the Surface is an abject failure. They AREN'T SELLING. Have you ever seen one in public? Nope. But cue the people who will claim "I have one" or "we all use them at work". Sure you do.

    1. Re:Surface is a failure by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      just because surface users don't spend their days in starbucks doesn't mean there aren't any

    2. Re:Surface is a failure by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Forget Starbucks. Go to an office building. The street. Ever seen one? I have seen them at NFL games, except they all want to get rid of them.

    3. Re: Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush did 9/11, we never landed on the moon,illegal aliens are stealing our jobs and women for Mars, dingo's probed my baby, and we hide kobolds in area 51.

    4. Re: Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see one every day. It sits on my coffee table at arms reach. I guess I should start strapping it to my back every time I leave my house.

    5. Re:Surface is a failure by fred6666 · · Score: 2

      Actually yes, I've seen many of them. Surface Pros.

    6. Re:Surface is a failure by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the doorman stop you when you try to go into an office building? Or do you disguise yourself by carrying a broom?

    7. Re:Surface is a failure by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen one in public?

      Yes, several, and not all of them owned by Microsoft employees.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its an option at my work when getting a replacement laptop. Its hit or miss. The marketdroids and managers seem to like them, everyone else opts for a Dell Precision.

    9. Re:Surface is a failure by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I don't see iPads in public, either, though... people leave their tablets sitting on the coffee table gathering dust until they need to give the kids something to watch Moana on for a car trip.

    10. Re:Surface is a failure by technoid_ · · Score: 1

      I support Surface Pro2s and up at work. One client is an office that is running AutoDesk on Surface Pro 2/3 models.

      We also have a technical sale company that uses Surfaces for sales people and engineers.

      I don't care for them and find them to have a few quirks, but the users like them. Or they say that do after convincing their company to shell out the money for the Surface and dock.

      One thing we did get complaints about is the decrease in battery life of a Surface Pro 4 compared to a Pro 3.

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do - Lew of GO magazine
    11. Re:Surface is a failure by flynnieous · · Score: 1

      I believe the word you are looking for is "queue".

      This response was written on an SP4 with 16GB, which I use in my job to write code and share information. Yes, it runs Linux. Yes, it runs AmiDuos, meaning I can use pretty much any Android app as well. It's actually a much nicer machine than I expected it to be.

    12. Re:Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, I've seen many of them. Surface Pros.

      as a microsoft employee you probably have a big pile of them stored in your cubicle

    13. Re:Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen one in public?

      Yes, several, and not all of them owned by Microsoft employees.

      I saw a big pile of surface pros not owned by microsoft employees

      and then i walked away from the microsoft store

    14. Re:Surface is a failure by nine-times · · Score: 1

      No, I think he means "cue". He's not asking people who claim to own a Surface to line up in a queue. He's signaling them, like an actor in a play, to begin speaking their lines.

    15. Re:Surface is a failure by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Go to an indoor event and try and see it through the fucking forest of ipads being held up to photograph or video it.

      Trust me, I'd much rather people left them at home.

    16. Re:Surface is a failure by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Don't believe the hype: the Surface is an abject failure. They AREN'T SELLING.

      I'm sick of feeding your trolling but some idiot out there has too many mod points so:

      They aren't selling. They are ONLY providing MS with $1bn worth of revenue per quarter. I wish I could produce something that doesn't sell that bad.

      Have you ever seen one in public? Nope. But cue the people who will claim "I have one" or "we all use them at work". Sure you do.

      You're an idiot. /Posted from a Surface Pro 3.

    17. Re:Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      I have a Surface 2... POS. Microsloth never did the OS upgrade promised to make it more 10-like. Being locked into the Store means nothing but games and useless fluff. Not the most stable to be sure -- the detachable folding keyboard comes and goes. And when you buy hardware from them its no exchange, returns or refunds. Have to get an RMA number from customer service -- but they want to argue with you, then pass you around until you get the guy who no longer speaks English. Killed any good will I had towards them.

      Makes a nice spacer on my desk -- but for anything useful I have an Android tablet now. It is reliable...

    18. Re:Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Surface Pro is actually a decent little machine and one of Microsoft's few good ideas in recent years. The Surface RT was complete junk though and scrapping it was the right call. Why they think yet another attempt at a crippled lockeddown version of Windows tablets deserves another attempt I have no idea.

    19. Re:Surface is a failure by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I have never seen one "in the wild", personally.

    20. Re:Surface is a failure by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      I have never seen one "in the wild", personally.

      I have never seen an elephant in the wild. Therefore, they must not exist.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    21. Re: Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have also never seen me pee.

    22. Re:Surface is a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, let's say that there are as many surfaces in the US as there are elephants. That would be about 400.

    23. Re:Surface is a failure by flynnieous · · Score: 1

      D'oh! Of course you are right. For some reason I had visions of pool cues in my head.

  14. Windows 10 upgrade still free for everybody by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The legal fiction being that you must use the accessibility tools - so upgrade and use the screen magnifier. There, you've satisfied the requirements.

    I remember saying, when they set a time limit on the "free upgrade" that it would be unenforceable...Microsoft doubled down on this when all their new Win10 releases accepted Windows 7 and 8.x Product keys. In theory, they could enforce it through activation, but they simply do not, and trying to enforce it on activation introduces a lot more (costly and operational) headaches for Microsoft.

    I can see them, however, expanding this idea that some hardware gets an extended period of upgrades, but the reality is that it's just a thought exercise.

    1. Re:Windows 10 upgrade still free for everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I upgraded a Thinkpad T420 which ran Windows 7 saturday before Easter. Put in the USB stick, booted, installed, didn't enter any key. It activated automatically itself. Nothing required, no accessibility anything.

    2. Re:Windows 10 upgrade still free for everybody by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Of course! They really want everyone using their spying, publicity-laden OS. The false deadline was only a device to scare people into upgrading before it was too late.
      This new Windows 10 S is just the first step into trying to force everyone into only using apps installed through their app store.
      I wish the "walled garden" model had never been invented.

  15. It's bitztream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating Slashdot troll!

    1. Re:It's bitztream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Awww. Poor little biztream can't handle people liking someone pointing out of the fact that it's a troll, so has to post a fake reply to make it look like somebody agrees with it.

  16. Annual Subscription Fee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only question I have is when is Microsoft going to a annual Subscription Fee? That's the direction they seem to be headed they just haven't said when.

    1. Re:Annual Subscription Fee? by tepples · · Score: 1

      It appears you'll need a subscription fee of $49 to $99 per year in order to make an unlisted app on one PC and install it on a Windows 10 S laptop. And this will remain the case until Microsoft adds Visual Studio to Windows Store.

    2. Re:Annual Subscription Fee? by torkus · · Score: 1

      Nah, they charge every time you buy a new PC and throw away the old windows license that's tied to the hardware.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    3. Re:Annual Subscription Fee? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Office 365 is basically that: they bundle some cloud nonsense with it, but for most customers it's just a simple way of getting a license to the current version of Office at a flat per-user (not per-device) price.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. windows home vs pro was about domains in the past by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    windows home vs pro was about domains in the past for the most part.

    OSX did have server ver's in the past.

  18. they do have annual fees for Enterprise Agreements by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    they do have annual fees for some Enterprise Agreements

  19. Pffft by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    So you get a free upgrade from bullshit to slightly more full featured bullshit.

    Until they start making Enterprise readily available, this is all just handwaving.

    It's so frustrating... Apple has been pissing me off to no end with their hardware decisions, and yet Microsoft has *still* managed to piss me off so much more that I would rather pay the Apple Dongle/Dingleberry Tax than go back to Windows..

  20. Everything that orbits around Windows 10 is by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    a clusterfuck of DontWant. From the locked-down hardware, the Microsoft appstore, the reboot-when-Microsoft-says, ads in the taskbar (and elsewhere), locked-down browser and search... it is indeed a big pile of shit.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Everything that orbits around Windows 10 is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL but so much true FUCK THEM

    2. Re:Everything that orbits around Windows 10 is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you are obviously just not with it. As a windows user I can safely say that I love it every time microsoft fucks me up the ass. It happens so often I have just had extensive surgery. I mean I could use linux but that would mean spending a few hours learning something new so fuck that.

      * bends over for next uprape *

  21. Re: windows home vs pro was about domains in the p by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Yes OS X still has a server version but so does Windows. But the point was/is that OS X only has one version for most consumers. Some businesses and consumers may need the server version but Apple doesn't split their consumer version into multiple flavors.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  22. Repeating the same mistake by sentiblue · · Score: 1

    After WindowsRT for the Surface tablet, you'd think MS learns its lesson. Now they are doing the same stupid mistake again.. all the while having to spend money and time to create windows 10S.... that's just begging for trouble!

  23. No because encrypted containers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, since the Creators Updare, Windows Store apps are in an encrypted container so you can't just plop the files on WINE and run it.

    1. Re:No because encrypted containers by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You answered that backwards. "Does it run Linux?" is not the same question as "Does it run on Linux?" And this is hardware, not software - so it's a bit of a nonsense statement anyway.

    2. Re:No because encrypted containers by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC more that the hardware can run Linux as a new install that removes Windows as an OS.
      Or is the new MS hardware locked down and will only work with Windows for now.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  24. Re:Blah blah blah Microsoft blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows S (ShitStorm) there you have it.

  25. Windows Subsystem for Linux by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 0

    Yes, as of the Windows 10 Anniversary Update. Ask, and you shall receive.

  26. Can I switch it this way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there something I can switch in Surface Tablet that will send a standing wave back through Microsofts' EPS conduit systems, overloading their warp core and blowing them to smithereens? I'd like to save the Galaxy from them.

  27. Note the asterisk at the end, there is a footnote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you upgrade to Pro, be advised, you cannot revert back to Windows 10 S*
    - -
    *Mwa ha ha ha ha ha

  28. Re:Note the asterisk at the end, there is a footno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck would you want to?

  29. Once you go hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can never go back.

  30. OK, I won't by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Don't let the new Windows 10 S operating system stop you from buying a Surface Laptop this year.

    OK, I won't let Win 10S specifically stop me from buying a Surface. I'll let the presence of any form of Windows 10 stop me from buying it.

  31. Free? by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    Free as in herpes right?

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  32. How's life in the hypocrite lane?

  33. Do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really want to be locked into Microsoft app store ecosystem? They need an app store that's both popular and non-exclusive before they attempt to foist an OS on people that can only install apps from that store.