Slashdot Mirror


'Weaponized' Twitter Bots Spread Info From French Campaign Hack (recode.net)

"The French media and public have been warned not to spread details about a hacking attack on presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron," writes Slashdot reader schwit1, with the election commission threatening criminal charges. But meanwhile, "the leaked documents have since spread like wildfire across social media, particularly on Twitter," reports Recode. Nicole Perlroth, a cybersecurity reporter with the New York Times, pointed out that an overwhelming amount of the tweets shared about the Macron campaign hack appear to come from automated accounts, commonly referred to as bots. About 40% of the tweets using the hashtag #MacronGate, Perlroth noted, are actually coming from only 5% of accounts using the hashtag. One account tweeted 1,668 times in 24 hours, which is more than one tweet per minute with no sleep... Twitter appears not to have done anything to combat what is obviously a bot attack, despite the fact the social media company is well aware of the problem of bot accounts being used to falsely popularize political issues during high-profile campaigns to give the impression of a groundswell of grassroots support.
The Times reporter later tweeted "This could be @twitter's death knell. Algorithms exist to deal with this. Why aren't you using them?" And one Sunlight Foundation official called the discovery "statistics from the front lines of the disinformation wars," cc-ing both Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg. In other news, the BBC reports France's president has promised to "respond" to the hacking incident, giving no further details, but saying he was aware of the risks because they'd "happened elsewhere"."

6 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The bigger issues here are the overseas bank account he denied having and what's in the emails. Don't get distracted by who's releasing damning information, if the information is real the only issue is that it exists - of course corrupt people have dirt on them.

  2. Re:Who gains the most from dividing the EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As someone from, and living in, the EU. I'm worried much more about Russia than the US.

    To be honest though, I'm not really worried about either, but if I had to pick...

  3. Apathetic Americans by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    let the Russians totally pwn their electoral process with impunity. Putin has made you folks a laughing stock. Just sayin.

    Tomorrow I expect the French people will give a big fuck you to Czar Vladimir

  4. Fact-free news by Xenographic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's doubly hilarious because they're copying Hillary's losing response to this, right down to the attempts to sow doubt about the docs while admitting there are true ones in there. Or how they think that censorship is the answer, lest someone find "inaccurate" information. Best to stick to fact-free news, I guess?

    Ask Donna Brazille how well that strategy works. The funniest part is that it appears that Kim Dotcom got his revenge on Hillary in the end and they can't even get him for it now without admitting the whole charade.

  5. Re:Pro-Macron folks sure protest a lot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's only one piece of information that matters about Le Pen: She and her party are fucking neo-nazis.

  6. Re:Anything worth leaking? by phayes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nah, it's just internal campaign emails of little importance that the leakers mixed in with transparently forged documents about foreign bank accounts. I have friends who'll be voting FN & even among them nobody believes that the bank account dumps are true. Putin's overuse of the same tactics are wearing thin.

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue