Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Came, But the French Were Prepared (nytimes.com)

Adam Nossiter, David E. Sanger, and Nicole Perlroth, reporting for the New York Times: Everyone saw the hackers coming. The National Security Agency in Washington picked up the signs. So did Emmanuel Macron's bare-bones technology team. And mindful of what happened in the American presidential campaign, the team created dozens of false email accounts, complete with phony documents, to confuse the attackers (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled; alternative source). The Russians, for their part, were rushed and a bit sloppy, leaving a trail of evidence that was not enough to prove for certain they were working for the government of President Vladimir V. Putin but which strongly suggested they were part of his broader "information warfare" campaign. The story told by American officials, cyberexperts and Mr. Macron's own campaign aides of how a hacking attack intended to disrupt the most consequential election in France in decades ended up a dud was a useful reminder that as effective as cyberattacks can be in disabling Iranian nuclear plants, or Ukrainian power grids, they are no silver bullet. The kind of information warfare favored by Russia can be defeated by early warning and rapid exposure.

4 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Oddly self-ingratiating article by Tranzistors · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What does it say that the IT team had enough resources to generate honeypots but couldn't actually... SECURE the emails and just assumed they were going to get hacked anyway?

    I guess it shows competence. Lately the question is not “if you get hacked?”, but “what do you do when hacked?”. The risk of any compromising leak is that it could contain fabrications that seem kind of legit. This problem is exacerbated when the leak happens just days before the election, since that is enough time to find dirt and write sensational articles, but not enough time to verify the truthfulness.

    The security team correctly identified the threats and used effective countermeasures.

  2. Re:You have to be a real 'tard to deny the Russian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "conspiracy theorist" label is usually applied to people who have no evidence for their beliefs.

    In this case, the cyber defense arm of the US government warned the French of Russian attacks based on the information they had.

    You are a moron who is slinging around insults without regard for the truth. Regardless of where you live, you are part of the reason your city, state, and country have problems.

  3. Re:Preparation? For thought? by lorinc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you mad because for the first time in history, France has a president that is better at English grammar than the US president?

  4. Re:propaganda by Derekloffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They didn't need to change their vote to Trump, just not vote. That alone does serious damage to the democratic camp. I know I will never vote for someone who plays this game because they are every bit as toxic as Trump is.