Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Downranks News Feed Links To Crappy Sites Smothered In Ads (techcrunch.com)

Facebook's New Feed algorithm is targeting links that send people to crappy websites filled with advertisements. According to their blog post, Facebook defines a "low-quality site" as one "containing little substantive content, and that is covered in disruptive, shocking or malicious ads." TechCrunch reports: The change could help Facebook fight fake news, as fakers are often financially motivated and blanket their false information articles in ads. High-quality sites may see a slight boost in referral traffic, while crummy sites will see a decline as the update rolls out gradually over the coming months. Facebook tells me that the change will see it refuse an immaterial number of ad impressions that earned it negligible amounts of money, so it shouldn't have a significant impact on Facebook's revenue. Facebook product manager for News Feed Greg Marra tells me Facebook made the decision based on surveys of users about what disturbed their News Feed experience. One pain point they commonly cited was links that push them to "misleading, sensational, spammy, or otherwise low-quality experiences... [including] sexual content, shocking content, and other things that are going to be really disruptive." Today's change is important because if users don't trust the content on the other side of the links and ads they see in News Feed, they'll click them less. That could reduce Facebook's advertising revenue and the power it derives from controlling referral traffic. Getting sent to a low-quality, shocking site from News Feed could also frustrate users and cause them to end their Facebook browsing session, depriving the social network of further ad views, engagement and content sharing.

95 comments

  1. In other words... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Facebook Downranks News Feed Links To Crappy Sites Smothered In Ads

    In other words, "Do As I Say, Not As I Do."

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that they don't do the proper thing, which would be not show those links at all. That's because links to crappy sites smothered in ads are a major source of revenue for them.

    2. Re:In other words... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's because links to crappy sites smothered in ads are a major source of revenue for them.

      It is their only source of revenue.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:In other words... by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      That's because links to crappy sites smothered in ads are a major source of revenue for them.

      It is their only source of revenue.

      I thought selling personal user info was a big part of their revenue stream.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re: In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They don't sell info.
      They sell targeted advertising, which is far more lucrative. Your info is only valuable in bulk aggregate, why would they sell that data once when they can sell indirect access to it over and over?

    5. Re:In other words... by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 2

      My use of FB has dropped substantially since all the pages I followed had decided to jump on the sensational bandwagon. Funny how once I dropped George Takei my newsfeed went silent almost. No more "These 10 things...", or "I couldn't believe Number 5" showing up ten times a day and being recycled.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    6. Re:In other words... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, YOU spread fake news. I give you alternate facts!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:In other words... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not quite. While Facebook is full of ads they aren't the abusive pop-over, blinky light, don't let the browser go, flashy gif autoplaying advert bullshit you see on so many sites now a days.

      If even half the internet had ads like Facebook's we'd probably be in a better* place.

      *Ads only, not tracking. If half the internet tracked like Facebook I wouldn't have the spare CPU cycles to render the page.

    8. Re:In other words... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Why would you sell the chicken that lays the golden eggs.

      This is one thing people don't seem to understand about Facebook and Google, and why we're outraged at the recently legislative changes to what ISPs are allowed to do. Facebook and Google DO NOT SELL user information. They provide a platform for advertisers which allows advertisers to feed ads to users in a very targetted way based on the user information.

      Facebook and Google selling user information would be like a patent troll trying to make money by selling all its patents.

    9. Re:In other words... by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      To quote George Carlin (out of context). "BULLSHIT! THAT'S OUR FUCKIN JOB!"

    10. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook ads are nowhere near as annoying or full-page as what they're talking about here. Not even remotely close.

  2. there goes ESPN by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    and Deadspin

    1. Re:there goes ESPN by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      And Buzzfeed.

    2. Re: there goes ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing of value was lost.

    3. Re:there goes ESPN by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      ...and nothing of value was lost. :-P

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  3. So sorry... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So sorry Slashdot. I guess no Facebook love for you...

    BTW, your floating ads and stealing of horizontal space for your shitty ads (are you aware there's a dumbass ad with an Edward Snowden hipster-lookalike on a scooter which is just laughably awful) are making this site suck. Some of the ads don't properly timeout and cause all kinds of scrolling issues.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:So sorry... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't see any ads. But it's not because I have an ad blocker, it's because I gave Slashdot some money.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:So sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So sorry Slashdot. I guess no Facebook love for you...

      BTW, your floating ads and stealing of horizontal space for your shitty ads (are you aware there's a dumbass ad with an Edward Snowden hipster-lookalike on a scooter which is just laughably awful) are making this site suck. Some of the ads don't properly timeout and cause all kinds of scrolling issues.

      Ads? What ads? I don't see any ads.

      Oh, you must be one of the dumbasses not using AdBlock?

    3. Re:So sorry... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      Get some:

      https://pi-hole.net/

      No need for a Raspberry. Run the damn thing in a VM if need be.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:So sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disabling javascript also works wonders.

    5. Re:So sorry... by pop+ebp · · Score: 1

      Is subscriptions still available? They seem to have removed the subscriptions link from the front page.

    6. Re:So sorry... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "Please Note: Buying or gifting of a new subscription is not available at the moment. We apologize for the inconvenience. This downtime though does not effect your current active subscription in any way. We will keep you posted on the latest"

      TAKE MY MONEY

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:So sorry... by houghi · · Score: 1

      The scrolling issues are done on purpose, because you will click on it by accident. It would be easy to tell what space it would occupy. It has been part of HTML 1.0 or so.

      Unfortunately my work does not allow me to install an ad-blocker (and I do not understand they do not have one installed by default, but whatever)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re: So sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed ad blocking on mobile because of Slashdot.

      They were serving up malicious redirect ads with infinite popups, browser hijacks, and activating the phone vibration.

      Fucking disgusting behavior from the new site owners. Never another dime from me.

  4. N/A by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    This doesn't apply to my websites. ;)

    1. Re:N/A by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      This doesn't apply to my websites. ;)

      Optimized for Lynx?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re: N/A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't feature ads, then they would never link to you.

    3. Re:N/A by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Optimized for Lynx?

      I haven't used Lynx in 20+ years. I should check out my websites in Lynx. The static websites will probably fare better than the WordPress websites.

    4. Re: N/A by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you don't feature ads, then they would never link to you.

      I only have three ad slots on each page.

    5. Re:N/A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every webdev should have to support lynx or w3m. The web would be so much cleaner and faster.

    6. Re:N/A by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      It's actually not bad advice as a base exercise to start with for public sites that have to comply with accessibility laws. If it's not readable visually in Lynx, there's little to no chance for some poor blind sod who's limited to using screen reader software.

    7. Re:N/A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Optimized for Lynx?

      I haven't used Lynx in 20+ years. I should check out my websites in Lynx. The static websites will probably fare better than the WordPress websites.

      'Static' sites ARE better than WordPress sites. Even if a site is delivering dynamically generated static content, it is better than WordPress and any other web 2.0 'responsive' design. You don't load the location of an image without giving it the dimensions it will take when loaded - this is why crap jumps all over the place while loading. Would you design a home blueprint without concrete wall dimensions, static dimensions for width for the refrigerator? No. The house cannot change on the fly after it has been build to accommodate any refrigerator size on the fly. We either set the width based on the known refrigerator or we only pick refrigerators that will fit into the fixed space.

      Most web designers are good at esthetics but have no concept of how the underlying HTML base actually works. I've seen it many times. Our last webmaster used WYSIWYG tools and had never looked at HTML before. No idea what a tag was.

      To use math as an analogy, it's fine to use a calculator once you actually learn the math enough to do it on paper. Then the calculator is a tool. If you only know how to use a calculator, you really have no idea if the answer you find actually makes sense let alone is actually correct. WordPress is the calculator of web development - all it does is teach how to use the calculator with no regard for understanding the actual math.

    8. Re:N/A by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If it's not readable visually in Lynx, there's little to no chance for some poor blind sod who's limited to using screen reader software.

      That was a big controversy at my job when it was mandated that everyone had to use a custom website access a database and it had no accessibility features. As luck would have it, a blind programmer became a squeaky wheel and went to war on the web team. During the two months that it took to implement the accessibility features, the interface kept changing from day to day for everyone else.

    9. Re:N/A by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      I know the point you're trying to imply but in reality, that experience should merely serve as an admonishment against retroactively adding accessibility compliance to a site built from the ground up by people who neither understand nor care about it.

    10. Re:N/A by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I know the point you're trying to imply but in reality [...]

      That was one of the lessons pointed out in the post mortem.

    11. Re:N/A by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Most web designers are good at esthetics but have no concept of how the underlying HTML base actually works.

      When I was software testing intern in 1997, I had to fix HTML code by hand because a table wouldn't line up correctly in Adobe Dreamweaver. Still hand code HTML to this day. Never got used to a WYSIWYG editor.

  5. So all the GOP tabloids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait for it in 10, 9, 8, 7... "Facebook blocks right leaning news on Facebook."

  6. hmm, sounds like facebook won't link to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So every time I visit a facebook page it pops up disruptive advertising about me logging in or signing up. I don't want to f'ing sign up for your sh***y site.

    1. Re:hmm, sounds like facebook won't link to self by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      ... every time I visit a facebook page ... I don't want to f'ing sign up for your sh***y site...

      Than why do you visit it so often? I know it's geek or leet or whatever to say you hate Facebook, but own up to it, you're there every day because those are the only "friends" you have.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:hmm, sounds like facebook won't link to self by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      ... every time I visit a facebook page ... I don't want to f'ing sign up for your sh***y site...

      Than why do you visit it so often? I know it's geek or leet or whatever to say you hate Facebook, but own up to it, you're there every day because those are the only "friends" you have.

      Because everyone in the world is on Facebook. Subject specific forums have become passe, and Usenet has long since become a vast echo chamber containing mostly Pr0n and a few old timers like, well, me. Last weekend I very reluctantly signed up for the Facebook version of rec.motorcycles.harley, because (it took me a long time to admit to myself) there was nobody there but me and the bot that posts the "how to post to RMH" weekly messages. Now that I write that, it seems like I need a life.

      My daughter tells me that Instagram made Facebook obsolete. And Snapchat is making Instagram obsolete. I'm thinking blipverts will be next.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:hmm, sounds like facebook won't link to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the same AC as above, but..

      Than why do you visit it so often?

      ..because it's my job. I have to check Facebook at least once per week. My employer mistakenly believes that they are helping us, rather than us spending money to help them.

      I estimate that Facebook has the most free employees of any business. Zuckerberg is an evil genius, and the owner of my company is one of the people he's exploiting.

    4. Re:hmm, sounds like facebook won't link to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because everyone in the world is on Facebook.

      Wrong.
      I'm not on facebook, and that fact has so far not created any particular problems for me. I still reach people by phone or email - or meeting face to face.

      I'm sure facebook is fun for a lot of people - but it is nowhere near 'a necessity'.

    5. Re:hmm, sounds like facebook won't link to self by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      It depends on what kind of work you do, or who your circle of friends are. I do photography as a sideline, and no matter my personal feelings about Facebook, it's undeniably a way to keep in touch with my customers, share content, and promote my work. I wish it wasn't, but that's just the way things are.

      Speaking of which... I have a friend who adamantly refused to sign up for Facebook, and his solution was to only choose friends who were accessible by ways other than Facebook, so he could maintain that he didn't need Facebook (pretty much by definition).

      And then... and THEN... years later, he confesses that he's been on Facebook all along under a pseudonym (not in my friends list) and when he finally friends me... I find that he's doing all the facebook-centric stuff he had been complaining about all along. He posts pictures of his meals. He forwards memes. He "likes" other posts. (At least, he doesn't play Facebook games as far as I know.) And that's about it. No original content. (Unless you count a picture of breakfast as original content.)

      Now, I started Facebook early enough that I could get a custom URL that was just my name, mostly out of curiosity. I rapidly got tired of all the crap (Farmville!!!) and nearly quit, until I learned that you could fix most of them. Facebook lets you turn off game notifications. You *must* do that, or you're going to get frustrated very quickly. Plugins like Social Fixer will filter out most of the other crap. And then, you're at the mercy only of the people in your friends list. So, make sure you pick decent friends. (Actually, you can still stay "friends" with someone and not have them in your news feed.)

      And (this is the important point)... see... I was there when email was only for the military, some universities, and military contractors. I was there when Cantor and Siegel happened. I've had access to the internet since before Algore invented it. And as soon as it went commercial, we all had to learn how to filter our access to it, including really intricate email filters.

      Facebook is the same. It's an open pipe that gains access to a little helpful information and a lot of sewage, just like email. Just like most of the raw internet. And with Facebook, you have to protect your identity, your name and your sanity in much the same ways as you do with those other resources. It's not rocket surgery.

      The great majority of my posts (probably over 90%) are original content. My own photos (of which virtually none are food), and my own writings and opinions. (Why bother forwarding a meme when you can just state what your opinion is and why you feel like that?) I amuse myself busting hoaxes that others in my "friends" list have fallen for. This has cost me a few "friends", but the rest have learned (most of the time) to google a meme or "contest" or "type amen" before reposting, because they know I'll jump on it if it's a hoax.

      Facebook is just another conduit. How valuable it is to you depends entirely on what you do with it. Just like any other interaction with the internet.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  7. Click for Ten Simple Tricks to save $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, before we get to the simple tricks, be assured they are the best trucks to save you money. Everybody spends money. Everybody likes saving money.

    1. Re: Click for Ten Simple Tricks to save $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn how they defeated advertising with this ONE SIMPLE TRICK!!!

      Spam sites HATE them!!!

  8. Cheap trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the data mining and deep learning I'm surprised it isn't easier to flag horrible sites. Instead they resort to a pretty obvious and superficial criteria.

    1. Re:Cheap trick by rudy_wayne · · Score: 3, Informative

      With all the data mining and deep learning I'm surprised it isn't easier to flag horrible sites. Instead they resort to a pretty obvious and superficial criteria.

      It would be extremely easy to get rid of links to shitty clickbait sites. But that would seriously cut into Facebook's revenue. Once again, Facebook is full of shit.

    2. Re:Cheap trick by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why would it? Facebook's main revenue stream is based on it's own ads not on redirecting a user to somewhere else.

  9. You should see Yahoo's news links by magarity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a while now Yahoo's news has been polluted with the worst sort of clickbait adbombs. Facebook has their work cut out for them if they are trying to be worse.

    1. Re:You should see Yahoo's news links by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      For a while now Yahoo's news has been polluted with the worst sort of clickbait adbombs. Facebook has their work cut out for them if they are trying to be worse.

      When your business depends on advertising (and you have no integrity) that's what you get.

    2. Re:You should see Yahoo's news links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there are auto-playing videos down the bottom of a page. Even though they're thumbnail sized and muted it is a DRAIN!
      And a false-metric to report upwards that the video has been 'viewed X times'.

      Well yeah if it auto plays, and is so tiny & quiet that no one turns it off!
      crap.

  10. Herr Judenberg: FUCK your ads, whimp... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads/script & malware rob speed/security/privacy

    Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!

    Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirects (99.999% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + lightens DNS load & resolves faster from local system RAM!

    * Via what u NATIVELY have in the IP stack in FASTER kernelmode!

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/

  11. So all the Leftist sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm looking at you Salon, Buzzfeed, Daily Kaos... nice knowing ya!

    1. Re:So all the Leftist sites by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Hmm... a few posts up, someone predicted that all the right leaning sites will be out now.

      Maybe that means that all the political crap fake news sites will become unlinked? That could make FB finally relevant as a site that filters all the politically biased crap.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Why I have no FB on my cell phone by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many web sites, and the FB app, have way too many ads, to the point that I can't even read the screen, and stop going to the site.

    And, to be quite frank, it's why I removed FB from my cellphone.

    Dudes. You can keep adding more ads, but if I can't see the text, I'm not going to read the site.

    I don't care how interactive you make it.

    I don't have time to remove twenty ads with close boxes that decide close X means link to site.

    I get rid of it. Entirely.

    Pennywise. Pound foolish.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Why I have no FB on my cell phone by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > I don't have time to remove twenty ads with close boxes that decide close X means link to site.

      A personal white hot hate of mine.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Why I have no FB on my cell phone by jackharrer · · Score: 1

      Or you can install Firefox mobile with Adblock and Noscript and just add shortcut to desktop? As a bonus - if you switch to "Desktop view" you can even read messages without Facebook Messenger. So far I found 1 website that does not work with this combo - NewsThump...

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
  13. "low quality site" by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Facebook defines a "low-quality site" as one "containing little substantive content, and that is covered in disruptive, shocking or malicious ads."

    The snarky side of me wants to say "Yeah, like most of the internet". But at very least, like a substantial amount of the Yahoo front page. (I hate listies and will not click on anything that looks like one no matter how interesting or provocative the title.) It annoys me that I can't scan for headlines on the Yahoo front page without discarding half of them in the categories of "they couldn't believe what happened next" (under a photo of a half naked girl) or "the ten ugliest squirrels -- number 7 will make you lose your lunch". Or the latest one -- "this 'white oil' will put oil companies out of business". It's LITHIUM, people! Lithium! For batteries. Get it? Oh dear, I spoiled the surprise.

    Does anyone remember when the Seattle PI newspaper website was just swarming with full page popup ads and floating popovers and ads with animation and sound? The site had a tool where you could create your own survey.... and someone created a survey asking readers how much the site resembled a Pr0n site. (a) Not that much, (b) Somewhat (c) Enough to be really annoying (d) I'm expecting to meet LiveJasmine at any moment. They eventually toned down the ads. I wonder if it's because other sites were flagging Seattle PI as a "low quality site"?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  14. Re: AlmostAllAdsBlocked? You're a dumbass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just use a scriptblocker. Free, speeds up pages, you don't end up with a bloated hosts file, and you don't pay money to that asshole who spams his bullshit "one simple Engine, advertisers HATE him" garbage all over the place.

  15. Hosts block adscript faster & do far more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Do easily detected/stopped scriptblocker addons parse tags? Yes. Hosts don't doing far less CPU intensive work & block adscript servers 1st & faster.

    Do scriptblocker addons block known malicious sites/servers/botnet C&C/trackers/ads/dns tracking & security issues + slowups, COMBINED?? No.

    Hosts do.

    Do scriptblockers protect vs. DNS security issues as hosts do using hardcoded properly resolved favorites??? No.

    Hosts doing so also speeds you up taking away remote DNS roundtrip + calculation time.

    APK

    P.S.=> ... & I'm "the asshole" on topic giving all that way doing far more w/ far less in the IP stack itself natively in faster more cpu serviced kernelmode (not slower usermode bloating already bloated browsers' memory space)... apk

    1. Re:Hosts block adscript faster & do far more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look everyone more word soup from APK, he is like a retarded baboon when he types.
      Also from what he has said about his software he is a retarded baboon when coding as well.
      Overly complex bloated software that could be written as a script by anyone with the most basic bash knowledge in a couple of hours.
      Next he will go on about his glory days where he got published in some magazines publishing more crapware, will post quotes he takes out of context, just devolve into petty name calling, have delusions that he blew up the death star or defeated the terminator, or whine and bitch about fake names and anonymous posting.
      Maybe we will get lucky and he will start blaming everything on the Jews.
      I almost forgot he may start threatening to beat people up who point out his deficiencies.
      Maybe APK should take some time for introspection and see if he can figure out why people hate him but if he did he would incorrectly come to the conclusion that the problem is with everyone else.

  16. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... cause them to end their Facebook browsing session, depriving the social network ...

    The real reason: The market forces of of supply and demand actually working, and against a self-righteous supplier too. It seems Facebook has reached market saturation for "low-quality, shocking site" referrals, so the consumer needs are changing.

  17. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook will be blocking /.

    My fake news is faker than your fake news. I am the most fackiest of all time.

  18. Sponsored content by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The vast bulk of this kind of ad infested crap I see on Facebook is from sponsored content (IE paid ads) that have nothing to do with my actual newsfeed (as in the friends and pages I have elected to follow). They are not viral things being shared, but content actively promoted by Facebook for money. Many of these sites are so polluted with ads and broken up into so many pages you have to click through that they literally are non-functional. I wonder if Facebook is going to reduce their revenue and prevent these kinds of sponsored content?

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  19. What about ads on 'legit' sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some of the worst sites for being overwhelmed --to the point of freezing the computer, or groaning it so slow as to useless, are some older mainstream* news sources. Major newspapers and news magazines, and some tv networks.
    Example, I live in Los Angeles and looking for local news on the LA Times would be nice. I'm limited to 5 free views a month or something, but it's near impossible for me to read anything there because it loads up so much other stuff. One of the results is such sites are probably losing audience.

    * I tried thinking of a similar, more neutral word to describe old dinosaur news outlets, but quickly remembered this is /. It is impossible to post about anything without reductio ad liberal/snowflake/denier---pick you name calling.

  20. Best adblocking/security/speed/reliablity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject (does more for less): APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads/script & malware rob speed/security/privacy

    Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!

    Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirects (99.999% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + lightens DNS load & resolves faster from local system RAM!

    * Via what u NATIVELY have in the IP stack in FASTER kernelmode!

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/

    1. Re:Best adblocking/security/speed/reliablity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he left you a message you should read https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10595875&cid=54399465/

  21. AlmostAllAdsBlocked? You're a dumbass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
    9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get past dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data edit
    16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O use

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

    ClarityRay defeats it

    Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

    AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

  22. What happens next... by David+Gould · · Score: 2

    ...will BLOW YOUR MIND!

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    1. Re:What happens next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me, is it due to "one special trick"?
      I must know the ancient secrets modern readers have been denied!

    2. Re: What happens next... by David+Gould · · Score: 1

      All I can tell you is, advertisers HATE it!

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    3. Re:What happens next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If money changes hands, something else will get blown.

  23. Hack around by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Ads? What ads? I don't see any ads.
    Oh, you must be one of the dumbasses not using AdBlock?

    Which is also going to be one of the techniques used by crappy web site owner :
    if the webserver recieves a request from a IP within a known Facebook IP range, then serve instead an ad-less version.

    Then it's basically a cat-and-mouse game, as makers of crappy sites try to find better way to detect Facebook's access and Facebook tries to be less obvious (retrieve content through external 3rd party servers, retieve content through the webapp running on the poster's local browser, etc.)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  24. Just wipe diply off the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of Pete, just wipe Diply off the Internet and 90% of our bloated slideshow site problems disappear.

    And... for the other 10%:

    "Facebook defines a "low-quality site" as one "containing little substantive content, and that is covered in disruptive, shocking or malicious ads."

    Like Facebook...

  25. Likely to reduce "you'll never believe these 25" by satsuke · · Score: 1

    Another upshot of this kind of change would be reducing the presentation of those "CELEBRITIES EATING FOOD - YOU WON'T BELIEVE NUMBER 10" sites that have a sentence of content per click through (and 20 ads).

    I fail to see this as a problem.

  26. Meh. by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    Screw Facebook. Glad I'm not on it.

  27. I perform a service by Rastl · · Score: 1

    When I've got the time I do go to the clickbait sites. Then I find the link back to the Reddit thread they scraped and post it in the comments. I find it very satisfying to perform this service for people who are interested in the topic but not enough to click through all the pages and ads.

  28. I let /.ers speak for me (vs. your bs) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall

    APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    * My code's liked + recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> You're welcome to show you've done as well as the above (you can't blowhard talker)... apk

  29. APK is a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey retard you posted this already

    Maybe you should work on having an original thought instead of spamming

  30. APK blows hard elephant cock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More copypasta from APK, one of two things he can do effectively.


    You would know about blowhard with all the elephant cock you suck which is the other thing you can do effectively.


    There is no way I could show I suck elephant cock as well as you. I'm not into elephants.

  31. Goodbye from APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry everyone.

    We all know I have serious brain problems.

    Today I will be leaving slashdot forever because I will be seeking treatment for the severe head trauma I have received over the years of smoking some serious moose wang as well as the fetal alcohol syndrome I was born with

    I will stop posting BS about my hosts file engine as everyone is sick of seeing it and no one cares anymore

    I have been a real twat to people over the years for which is am truly sorry and I did deserve all the mockery. My delusions have started bleeding over into my real life far too often and my family staged an intervention last nigh. This is an all to rare moment of lucidness for me which I hope to hold onto for as long a possible.

    APK

    P.S. => Anyone claiming to be me after this is an obvious imposter and should be mercilessly mocked and trolled.

  32. Why is this an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as the link says "Sponsored" I don't click/touch on it. I must be in the minority.

  33. No more Links to Slahdot then... by sycodon · · Score: 1

    I almost couldn't post this due the page janking up and down loading crappy ads.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  34. You know who else hated Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK you know who else hated Jews; Hitler. The problem is he was more effective and less of a cunt than you, so go worship your orange orangutan god Trump and don't bother us any more. By the way retard you posted this before, think before you type.

  35. Explanation Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm just not part of the typical user base. In the last decade of having a facebook profile and using it on a semi-regular basis I have not once clicked on an advertisement, sponsored link, or featured content. Do people really spend all day reading those crappy pages?

    This always leads me back to Facebook's entire business model, which I similarly fail to understand. If I use their service but never click-thru and links and also never buy any of the items that are advertised, how does Facebook manage to sell millions of dollars of screen space to companies? At least with google I'm actually looking for something and they show me people who have paid to be first in line for me to view. On a social site I have no interest in adverts. I'm disturbed every time I look at their stock price.

  36. You impersonating me proves 1 thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: You WISH you were me via your "POOR imitation = sincerest form of flattery" post.

    APK

    P.S.=> It has to suck to be one of "your kind" in this life... apk

  37. I don't hate Torah jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: What I don't like = Synagogue of Satan per "I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan” (Revelation 2:9) Khazar Talmud abusing jews (whom Jacob Javitz assistant Rosenthal spilled the beans on to Walter White (look that up)) who consider all non-jews worthy of nothing but death, robbing or raping them, and slaves worse than dogs.

    APK

    P.S.=> They can't trace their bloodline back to the Holy land - Rosenthal ADMITTED it - & are FAKE jews who kill not only goyim/gentile but also REAL jews... apk

  38. Unidentifiable "ne'er-do-well" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Yet for all your hotair blowhard bs you can't manage what I did here https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10595875&cid=54399465/

    * LMAO @ U, loser...

    APK

    P.S.=> There's DOERS (like me) & "talkers" (like you & "your kind" - low)... apk

  39. Unidentifiable "ne'er-do-well" enjoy your -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: All your hotair blowhard bs can't manage what I did here https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10595875&cid=54399465/

    * LMAO @ U, loser...

    (ENJOY YOUR -1 DOWNMODERATION FOOL, lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> There's DOERS (like me) & "talkers" (like you & "your kind" - low)... apk

  40. Yes I did (vs. your unjustified downmods) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: You couldn't validly technically prove my points wrong then OR now & it ran you DRY of "downmodpoints" you can't justify - lmao @ U, fool!

    * Your kind? ALWAYS "dances" for me, playing perfectly into my trap of RUNNING YOU DRY OF YOUR ABUSED "downmodpoints"... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> That's when you begin your "honorable" (not) HIDING behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts (since I've dusted you before when you TRIED & FAILED @ taking me on directly, which I probably have bookmarked, just to toss back in your face IF you use your "registered 'luser'" account instead of ac troll posts)... apk