Slashdot Mirror
Amazon Is the 2nd Most Popular App Among Teens, Says Study (cnbc.com)
An anonymous reader writes: When it comes to apps they're using these days, teens and millennials say Snapchat is king -- no surprise there. But second place? It's not Instagram: It's Amazon. This is according to a survey -- The 2017 Love List Brand Affinity Index, run by Conde Nast and Goldman Sachs -- that asked 2,345 U.S. millennial and Gen Z shoppers about their fashion, retail and consumer preferences. The survey skewed towards younger consumers. One question asked which apps they were using currently that they weren't using a few months ago: Snapchat and Amazon came in first and second. (Other popular apps -- Instagram, Twitter and Pinterest -- came in third, fourth and fifth respectively.) "Users are looking for efficiency, speed and convenience, and Amazon hits all those buckets," said Conde Nast chief marketing officer Pam Drucker Mann told CNBC. On a side note, it appears people generally don't have many gripes with Amazon. Early results of our poll from Wednesday suggests Amazon is the last company (of the five tech giants) whose services people are keen on ditching. Also, regardless of how some of us feel about Snapchat, the company seems to be a hit among teenagers.
I don't understand how these people have money to spend on Amazon purchases in the first place.
It's usually cheaper than at the brick and mortar stores, at the mall, best buy, etc etc. Buying online is usually the thrifty option and exactly what someone without a lot of money would logically choose to do.
They're always whining about how they can't get jobs and have huge student loans to pay off their useless, private liberal arts college degrees.
Bias much? What about the ones with engineering degrees who can't get jobs, or physics degrees who can't get jobs, or chemistry degrees who can't get a job more senior than more than barrista at starbucks.
And so-called useless arts degrees are still completed degrees, and that should still make them suitable hires in lots of fields; and put them ahead of 'dropouts' and people who didn't even try post secondary school. Who are you more angry at... people without an art history degrees or people who failed even to get an art history degree?
And lets be honest here, the people designing logos, processing passport applications, working as executive assistants, writing product brochures, or managing accounts payable, etc don't really need more than post sec. But having a degree, any degree, is a huge leg up over the people that don't, towards getting hired.
I just don't get it.
I don't get you.
They're always whining about how they can't get jobs and have huge student loans to pay off their useless, private liberal arts college degrees.
You seem to be confused about what a teenager is.
Let me help you:
1. A "teenager" is someone whose age is in the "teens", 13 to 19.
2. Most teenagers are students, don't have jobs, and aren't looking for one.
3. Approximately 0% of teenagers have liberal arts degrees (or any other degree).
4. Very very few teenagers are trying to pay off their student loans.