Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek Bridge Crew Gets IBM Watson-Powered Voice Commands (theverge.com)

PolygamousRanchKid writes: Star Trek Bridge Crew -- the VR game that puts you in the slip-on space shoes of a Starfleet officer -- already emphasizes vocal communication when you're playing with real humans, but it will soon allow you to use your voice to issue orders to computer-controlled characters, too. The feature has been made possible using IBM's VR Speech Sandbox. The software combines IBM Watson's Speech to Text and Conversation services with the company's Unity SDK, using the natural language processing capabilities of IBM's Watson software to parse your barked commands, and allow AI-controlled characters to act on them. Players will be able to launch photon torpedoes, jump to warp speed, or lock S-foils in attack formation (maybe not that last one) by requesting that your crew members push the relevant blinking buttons on their own command consoles. The feature will go live in beta form this summer, soon after the game's release on May 30th, and will allow players to complete missions across VR platforms and with a mixture of human and AI teammates.

Slashdot reader PolygamousRanchKid adds: "Let's just skip all that stuff, and cut right to the part where Kirk gets the girl... How well it actually works in practice, we'll see this summer, aboard our own starships. "Scotty, beam up the IBM stock price!" -- Posterior Admiral Ginni Rometty

5 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. Leaves out the most important bit: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    By utilizing this software you agree to give IBM a royalty free, transferrable, resalable right to all vocal recordings, likenesses, and any other invaluable IP spoken within range of the always on gaming microphone.

    Should you wish to retain your privacy you may opt-out by signing the official IBM opt-in form, which guarantees that they will have access to all abovementioned intellectual property rights in the event that you sucessfully opted out.

    Oops.

    captcha was 'miseries'

  2. Computer by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    End simulation.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. IBM, Watson, and Deep Learning by wjcofkc · · Score: 3, Informative

    IBM is big on deep learning, and a centerpiece of that it Watson. I am wondering what Watson will gain from this through it's Speech to Text and Conversation services. If it's not connected in such a meaningful way, that seems like an opportunity lost.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  4. Re:Whoa by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    We can already do that comma and it works perfectly full stop post comment open porn folder

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. Re:Whoa by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Voice recognition is already pretty good. It's not Enterprise-D computer level good, but in most cases it works. What really bothers me is that I doubt that the simulation will be able to support some of the things that fans would say to it.

    "Reroute plasma through the secondary power coupling."

    "Cycle power through ventral relay."

    "Uncouple the Heisenberg compensators."

    Sure, Watson will turn the voice into text accurately enough, but the simulation won't support any of those things, and will just respond with the same thing that Alexa or Google Home does: "I'm sorry, I don't understand". That's just disappointing.