Slashdot Mirror


How Australia Bungled Its $36 Billion High-Speed Internet Rollout (nytimes.com)

Not very pleased with your internet speeds? Think about the people Down Under. Australia's "bungled" National Broadband Network (NBN) has been used as a "cautionary tale" for other countries to take note of. Despite the massive amount of money being pumped into the NBN, the New York Times reports, the internet speeds still lagged behind the US, most of western Europe, Japan and South Korea -- even Kenya. The article highlights that Australia was the first country where a national plan to cover every house or business was considered and this ambitious plan was hampered by changes in government and a slow rollout (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled; alternative source), partly because of negotiations with Telstra about the fibre installation. From the report: Australia, a wealthy nation with a widely envied quality of life, lags in one essential area of modern life: its internet speed. Eight years after the country began an unprecedented broadband modernization effort that will cost at least 49 billion Australian dollars, or $36 billion, its average internet speed lags that of the United States, most of Western Europe, Japan and South Korea. In the most recent ranking of internet speeds by Akamai, a networking company, Australia came in at an embarrassing No. 51, trailing developing economies like Thailand and Kenya. For many here, slow broadband connections are a source of frustration and an inspiration for gallows humor. One parody video ponders what would happen if an American with a passion for Instagram and streaming "Scandal" were to switch places with an Australian resigned to taking bathroom breaks as her shows buffer. The article shares this anecdote: "Hundreds of thousands of people from around the world have downloaded Hand of Fate, an action video game made by a studio in Brisbane, Defiant Development. But when Defiant worked with an audio designer in Melbourne, more than 1,000 miles away, Mr. Jaffit knew it would be quicker to send a hard drive by road than to upload the files, which could take several days."

6 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Sabotaged by Telstra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How dare someone else have a monopoly on internet service!

  2. Re:USA is highly ranked by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This ensures companies are always providing reasonable prices and a fast connection, as is evidenced by our high ranking compared to the Australian experiment.

    You're trolling, right? We're the nation that invented the internet and yet our ranking is shit, in large part because in most places people don't have a choice of high-speed internet providers.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Re:Lemme guess by micahraleigh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wait. That doesn't makes sense. I thought that when you take the profit motive out, workers become more motivated because they aren't trying to cheat anyone. Is someone alleging the government doesn't handle things very well?

  4. Everything old is new again by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mr. Jaffit knew it would be quicker to send a hard drive by road than to upload the files, which could take several days

    Or as Andrew Tanenbaum said back in 1989, "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  5. Same thing by argStyopa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Same exact thing I say when they talk about this with the US:

    Korea: 519 persons per sqkm
    Japan: 348 persons per sqkm
    Europe: 127 persons per sqkm
    USA: 35 persons per sqkm
    Australia: 3 persons per sqkm

    It seems to be hard for tech-enthusiasts to grasp that a widely-distributed population makes providing infrastructure INTRINSICALLY harder.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Same thing by ljw1004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same exact thing I say when they talk about this with the US:... USA: 35 persons per sqkm; Australia: 3 persons per sqkm. It seems to be hard for tech-enthusiasts to grasp that a widely-distributed population makes providing infrastructure INTRINSICALLY harder.

      I don't think it's useful to talk about the AVERAGE population density. In Australia the population is almost entirely concentrated in small dense coastal cities. If you served those dense cities well, you'd hit such a high proportion of the Australian population, that average internet speeds would increase dramatically.