Slashdot Mirror


Google Owns the Classroom (axios.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The NYT's Natasha Singer has a fascinating, provocative look at "How Google Conquered The American Classroom." "[M]ore than half the nation's primary- and secondary-school students -- more than 30 million children -- use Google education apps like Gmail and Docs... Chromebooks, Google-powered laptops that initially struggled to find a purpose... account for more than half the mobile devices shipped to schools."

114 comments

  1. In our area, Midwestern US, true by btroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Out my way, that is very true. All of my kids were initiated into the Google system since 5th grade. My older kids talked about how slow and terrible the windows PC's were, there are a few left. Then they started getting Chromebooks, complaints gone and for $100 they have a machine dedicated to them and they're pretty fast.

    They charge the machines maybe twice a week and the biggest complaint now is broken buttons, screens.

    1. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      So, it plays in Peoria?

    2. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In some ways Google was smart about ChromeOS; it has many of the support-advantages of an OS like OSX with closed hardware, but as it was something of a clean-sheet implementation as far as software support goes it didn't have to drag-in support for legacy applications unlike OSX, which had the ability (and arguably the need) to run "System" applications from pre-OSX days. Google has arguably done a better job of permissions in Chrome than other OSes have, it's a lot harder for the end user to compromise the machine by accident, and even a user that intentionally tampers with it has some pretty hard limitations to work around for some things. If you're one to tinker to learn then this is a problem, but if you need the equipment to just work and not eat itself for lunch then it's fine.

      Chromebooks also have the advantage of being extraordinarily inexpensive in most cases. It's hard to argue with a machine that does what's needed for half the price of a Windows machine or 1/3 the price of an OSX or iOS machine.

      For myself I wish that there was an easy way to flesh-out a ChromeOS install into a full-fledged Linux workstation without having to resort to cronut and chroot or without having to nuke-out ChromeOS entierly, but thems the breaks.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      How the times have change... If you didn't have an $2,500 Apple ][ at home in the early 1980's, your family must have been poor. A $100 Chromebook for each kid isn't that much of a big deal. Unless, of course, $100 is a big deal for some families.

    4. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still unfortunate. We're teaching a whole generation to never own their own data and to rely only on what someone else does for them. Lovely.

    5. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if your family could have cut into your food budget, they could have afforded two Apples.

    6. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if your family could have cut into your food budget, they could have afforded two Apples.

      My family liked to eat cantaloupes. We weren't into apples. Not sure how this is relevant to childhood computers.

    7. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the older non-touch version. Right?

      Now that Chromebooks have touchscreens and can run Android, I would hope that we can still buy new non-touchscreen plain vanilla Chromebooks.

      My nieces and nephews don't need an extra way to run Android games. And my brother is an idiot. He doesn't even remember that I gave him a parental control PIN number for the Google/Android TVs I gave him. Although his kids all know it.

      There is also the issue that touchscreen Chromebooks don't have the same kind of battery life as the older Chromebooks and that touchscreens have a glare on them that make them more difficult to use outside.

    8. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Yea, stop relying on what someone else does for them. Get rid of that Internet connection and take floppies to all your friends with your vacation photos on them.

    9. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      I work in a district where we have pushed Google hard for the last five years. We typically buy regular Chromebooks for most classrooms. Teachers get touch Chromebooks that flip around to make a tablet. We also tend to get those for K-2 classrooms as the touch functionality fits well with the younger kids. The plan moving forward is to keep this up as long as the price point is reasonable.

    10. Re: In our area, Midwestern US, true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB flash drives are very cheap. A $10 drive can hold all the pictures from multiple vacations.

      Why the hell are you mumbling something incoherent about floppies?

    11. Re:In our area, Midwestern US, true by darkain · · Score: 1

      Well, it IS called "parental control" for a reason!

    12. Re: In our area, Midwestern US, true by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      So when a kid turns in an assignment digitally, are you going to have them hand that flash drive in? Should the teacher get a bag to haul them all back and forth? Digital collaboration is the way people work today.

    13. Re: In our area, Midwestern US, true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure just because apple can't figure the Cloud out; the students should suffer.

    14. Re: In our area, Midwestern US, true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooooo. This is bad. Very bad. Stop changing stuff. Get back the paper and the encyclopedias. Our children are going to be stupid if they don't learn to write with ink and feathers.

  2. advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An advertising company owns our public school classrooms? Idiocracy. This should be illegal.

    1. Re:advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think you need a refresh on the definition of ownership there son

  3. Lawsuit coming right up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't be long before a class-action lawsuit is brought against google for digitally stalking and spying on minors.

  4. Apple, Adobe, and Google by transporter_ii · · Score: 0

    It's funny, this article acts like Microsoft is about to take the classroom, and the article doesn't even mention Google:

    https://www.cnet.com/news/why-...

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:Apple, Adobe, and Google by avandesande · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't mention education or the classroom even once. Why did you post that?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Apple, Adobe, and Google by tsqr · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't mention education or the classroom even once. Why did you post that?

      Did you miss the section under Microsoft wins the kids...and therefore the future? "As much as I dislike some aspects of Windows 10 S, as a way to get cheap computers into schools, it's a lot more practical than iPads. Even the conceptual graphics tools Microsoft is delivering are better and cheaper than Adobe's for kids, especially those at underfunded schools."

      More practical than iPads? Sure. More practical than Chromebooks? Not a chance.

    3. Re:Apple, Adobe, and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why that article talks about 360-degree video editing. VR headsets haven't exactly taken off and probably won't for some time, if ever.

      It's like the article is written by a marketer who believes in every Great New Thing being promised.

    4. Re:Apple, Adobe, and Google by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the article?

      Microsoft wins the kids...and therefore the future:

      As much as I dislike some aspects of Windows 10 S, as a way to get cheap computers into schools, it's a lot more practical than iPads. Even the conceptual graphics tools Microsoft is delivering are better and cheaper than Adobe's for kids, especially those at underfunded schools.

      --
      Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  5. tl;dr by sootman · · Score: 2

    Google's stuff is cheap or free, and schools have no money.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:tl;dr by TWX · · Score: 2

      What do you expect when you're spending $500 for an AP or $5000 for a 48-port switch? And those prices are in-bulk, if you're paying list it's closer to $1000 for an AP and $8000 for a switch, without even buying SFP modules. It's easily half a million bucks just for switches and APs for a large high school, and if the school was cabled with lots of small closets then you're looking at another $100,000 in fiber transceivers for 10G, plus the cost to the WAN provider to link at a meaningful speed back to the main datacenter. Hell, the 10G fiber switch for the high school campus is going to come in at $50,000 and that's assuming that the local campus is just connecting to the WAN, and not directly to the Internet.

      Once you've spent all of the money to build the network you don't necessarily have a lot left for the devices to use on that network.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:tl;dr by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      There is a tremendous amount of waste in school IT systems. At my local elementary school the principal asked me to look at a proposal for their "IT infrastructure" that included racked Cisco switches, and would cost over $20k. I explained that for the amount of bandwidth they were using, a few $39 routers from the local Walmart would be more than adequate. They went with the Walmart option, and it worked fine.

    3. Re:tl;dr by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      This. I do tech coaching with teachers in a mid-sized district. We have wireless in all schools. Our network is far more complex and expensive than people think.

    4. Re: tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody on the school board whose nephew quoted the Cisco gear 'solution' to the school administration is PISSED at you, now.

    5. Re:tl;dr by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Public schools don't pay for IT infrastructure. E-Rate does. On your phone bill is a line item for universal access or universal service. Those fees fund the E-Rate program. Schools can get reimbursed, based on the portion of students that qualify for free or reduced lunches, for technology and as long as they go towards educational purposes, with some exceptions. If 90% of the students qualify for free or reduced lunch, the school is reimbursed 90% of the project cost. The gotcha is that the poorer districts get reimbursed first, so once you get to the school districts with 60%, 50%, 40%, etc, the E-Rate funds are tapped out. Those school districts pass levies for classroom computers or whatever to pay for it.

      Also, nobody ever pays list.

    6. Re:tl;dr by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Unmanaged switches? Just wait until the kids figure out that they can take down the entire network by plugging in both ends of an Ethernet cable to the wall jacks.

    7. Re:tl;dr by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Unmanaged switches? Just wait until the kids figure out that they can take down the entire network by plugging in both ends of an Ethernet cable to the wall jacks.

      There are no "wall jacks" except in locked closets. Everything is WiFi.

    8. Re:tl;dr by TWX · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha.

      Oh wait, you're serious?

      HAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    9. Re:tl;dr by TWX · · Score: 1

      School districts also will put out for bond for equipment, or at least for cabling.

      Personally I'd rather that money borrowed against a 20 or 30 year bond pay for cabling rather than switches; cabling in-place has a decent chance of lasting 30 years while switches you're lucky to get a decade.

      E-rate is nice, but it tends to encumber where the equipment can be used. A district does not get a large pot for the whole place, it's campus by campus, and it can take a couple of years to get funded such that what was put out for E-rate might not match the campus needs by the time it's fulfilled. It can be frustrating when facilities bond remodels a campus and now the switch counts don't work out quite right.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    10. Re:tl;dr by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yup. One WAP per classroom so that the 30+ wireless devices per room will all be able to connect, and two cables per WAP so they can do 802.11ac, back to mid-grade L2 switches in the local IDF closet, fiber link back to the MDF with a mid-grade L3 fiber switch, out to the service provider. Plus the data drops for the VOIP phone, the printer, the WIDI and/or projector, and any remaining desktop computers that teachers might still be using.

      When Cisco's Sparkboard gets education licenses that aren't ridiculously-priced like their corporate licenses are, I expect that conventional Smartboards will be replaced by Sparkboards en-masse in many school districts. There's another data drop there.

      Then factor-in drops for the security cameras, the door/gate access controllers, the department photocopiers, the POS system in the cafeteria, the electronic marquee, the EMS controllers and other SCADA or building management stuff, there's a lot running on these networks.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's an even better joke is when an organization spends thousands upon thousands of dollars on an expensive network and it takes 8 hours to upload a text file.

      Just because you spend mountains of cash on a network and have "experts" swarming all over the place doesn't mean the network actually works right. Just because someone elected not to spend absurdly stupid amounts of cash doesn't mean their network runs poorly.

    12. Re:tl;dr by TWX · · Score: 1

      Of course. On the other hand, if you want to isolate network traffic by type then either you have to have a lot of physical cabling infrastructure, or else you have to upgrade to more expensive equipment that's VLAN-aware. This becomes even more important when you want authentication to help you sort users into the right VLANs correctly, like to automatically put trusted computers that are part of the AD domain into (semi-)trusted group, while guests and BYOD users for whom you have no control over the hardware into other VLANs with less privileges on the LAN/WAN. It also helps to isolate all other business functions so that users cannot reach devices that they have no business connecting-to.

      If I tried to run independent LANs for each function I'd need at least seven LANs overlaying the same facilities. The fiber plant and fiber optic transceiver budgets alone would dwarf the cost as-spent on VLAN-aware L2 switches. If I wanted to do it with L3 switches at each closet I'd probably spend as much as the fiber plant would cost, and I'd destroy easy wireless roaming without reauthentication and IP address changes on the clients.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    13. Re:tl;dr by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft ignored the market. I remember Microsoft laughing at the Chromebook and making derogatory comments about it's capabilities. 5 Years later those chromebooks are the only computers in primary and secondary education.

      The chromebook winning had far more to do with simplified administration and global accounts than it did to price of hardware. With a Google for School the student gets and account that's the same regardless of the computer they log into, with the chromebook the school gets a computer that's always up to date with the latest software and isn't abandonded after 2 years or that they have to pay a million bucks a year to keep up to date and pay 15 IT staff to manage. With chromebooks they need 1 IT guy to provision accounts and the hardware takes care of itself.

      Cost played a role, but features played a bigger role.

    14. Re:tl;dr by jazzdude00021 · · Score: 1

      This - exactly this. 4 years ago my school was faced with three options:
      1) Continue purchasing Office for teachers and staff and using Open/LibreOffice for students.
      2) Purchase Office365 for $99/user/year (this was before Office365 was free for Educational use.)
      3) Migrate to Google for free and maybe update Office for the couple people that need Publisher.

      Google is free and has low administrative overhead, and now has communities of teachers that are willing to help train other teachers on using it. Google won on price and understanding of how educators think.

  6. looking up own worst enemy on alphabet.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    greed/fear/ego based abuse enhanced psychosis no conscious conscience, no spirit, no heart no life.. cease fire stand down... sing along.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-kA3UtBj4M .. thanks again..

  7. This is a question? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    >> How Google Conquered The American Classroom.

    This is a question? Google won ON PRICE: free (or dirt-cheap-compared-to-Microsoft) online office suites and cheap (especially compared to Apple) tablets.

    1. Re:This is a question? by OldMugwump · · Score: 1

      Yes. Price matters. Microsoft, of all companies, should know that. They won the desktop because DOS, and then Windows, were the cheapest solutions at the time.

      --
      "Shoot, a fella could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff."
    2. Re:This is a question? by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention simpler security.

      The machines update themselves automatically. And the user can't install applications that run in the background and slow the entire thing down. So this essentially means very little support on your end when you give one of these devices.

      Now, don't get me wrong, you may still have grandma call to tell you that she hates Google Photos because it forces her to upload all her pictures online and it's lousy at editing pictures. And that she'd rather you install the PC photo editing software she bought out of the bargain bin at Best Buy.

      To which, you tell her that can't be done. And that's it. And if for some reason, she does break her Chromebook, or it gets stolen, she'll actually be able to recover her pictures, because they will all be online. So that's one more thing you don't have to worry about.

    3. Re:This is a question? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Actually, Microsoft won the desktop because Windows-only software -- and lots of it -- was first to market, not insignificantly in the area of games. Mac was the weapon of choice for graphics professionals, picking up the base that mismanaged Amiga squandered.

    4. Re:This is a question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded troll? Does Chrome OS not spy on its users behavior?

    5. Re:This is a question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a question?

      No. Grammatically, the title is not a question. It's a noun phrase.

    6. Re:This is a question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was modded "troll" because it tells a truth that some people would rather not hear.

    7. Re:This is a question? by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      In it's legal agreement with the school systems, Google agrees to "act as a school administrator." This is legal eduspeak that covers confidentiality. They use the data internally, I'm sure to develop new products, but they aren't selling it. Gmail in a Google for Education domain don't have advertising.

    8. Re:This is a question? by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      It's even better than that. If the school district has a Google for Education domain, you can actually manage the devices through Google's admin console. That means you can not only make sure they are updated, but you can push updates in a staggered fashion or hold updates if you need to. Plus, depending on the model, many of the Chromebooks are very easy to repair. Screens and keyboard are pretty easy to swap out. Our district contracts this out, but if I were in a smaller district, I would be training kids to do hardware work on these things to get some hands-on practice.

    9. Re:This is a question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which does not change the fact that the students' data is being given to the largest advertising company in the world - an entity many parents are not comfortable collecting data about their children.

    10. Re:This is a question? by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      And that advertising company legally agrees in it's contract with the schools not to sell that data. As a parent, if you don't want your student using Google, you are welcome to opt out. But frankly, it seems like paranoia to me.

    11. Re:This is a question? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      They use the data internally, I'm sure to develop new products, but they aren't selling

      THat may be what they say, but it's not what they do. At least, that's not what they were doing in 2014 when they were being sued for violating that ToS (and then publicly announced they were removing the visible option to control it from GMail for Education).

      In other words, they stopped obviously advertising, but are pretty clearly still building profiles of students. They don't sell that data, but they do us it to target sold ads.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    12. Re:This is a question? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Google won ON PRICE

      And security, and manageability, and maintenance.

      It's totally reasonable for a single relatively low-skilled I/T person (or even a sophisticated teacher or two) to manage a fleet of several hundred Chromebooks. If one of them breaks, there's no worry about trying to recover data; it's all in the cloud. Hand the kid another Chromebook (possibly after making the parents pay for it, depending on how it was damaged). There's no way for students to misconfigure them. There's no need to worry about security, they're highly secure and update automatically.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:This is a question? by OldMugwump · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that happened because MSFT already owned the desktop long before Windows existed. When the IBM PC was introduced in 1981, it was offered with 3 OSes: UCSD Pascal, CP/M 86, and "PC-DOS" (later known as MS-DOS). Of the 3, DOS was by far the cheapest, so dominated sales. And of course software developer targeted the OS that users had. The rest is...history.

      --
      "Shoot, a fella could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff."
  8. Difference between Google and Microsoft by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

    You actually have to pay Microsoft for the privilege of their apps spying on you (Windows 10), whereas Google at least does it for free.

    1. Re:Difference between Google and Microsoft by DogDude · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 sends telemetry data. Google sells EVERYTHING. The two are in no way equivalent.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Difference between Google and Microsoft by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      Google discloses what personal information they sell, whereas Microsoft does not. So you're correct, they're in no way equivalent.

    3. Re:Difference between Google and Microsoft by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Google very specifically does NOT sell data from it's edu domains.

    4. Re: Difference between Google and Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google doesn't sell data from any of the domains they mine data from. They only sell services that make use of said data.

    5. Re:Difference between Google and Microsoft by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Microsoft does not.

      That is a lie.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:Difference between Google and Microsoft by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      And where in that long document does Microsoft describe how they use your information to deliver the Windows 10 start menu ads?

  9. So did Apple by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    So we can expect Google to collapse and drop into utter obscurity until Microsoft bails them out and then they create an insanely great disruptive product that catapults them to the stratosphere?

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  10. um... by sootman · · Score: 1

    Why the link to the middleman page at Axios instead of going straight to the NYT article?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:um... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      No paywall on Axios?

    2. Re:um... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Ladies and gentlemen, step right in...

      https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  11. And I don't like it by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    My kids' school is like this - every kid gets a Google logon administered by the school. It's nice because they can access it from home to continue working on things, but not so nice because I don't like everything my children do being tracked by the Americans.

    I have no control over what's done with that information, or how it will be used in the years to come. I'm not even in the same country, so I have no legal recourse if I find the data gets shared and abused.

    It's not like it would have been that difficult for the school board to set up their own similar system, then the kids would just have to use a different URL than Google's.

    1. Re:And I don't like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but not so nice because I don't like everything my children do being tracked by the Americans.

      You should consider getting together with other concerned parents and pushing back against the policy.

      I'm an American and I don't want Google collecting data on all schoolchildren either. It normalizes the panopticon.

  12. Impressive numbers; anemic output quality... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    "[M]ore than half the nation's primary- and secondary-school students -- more than 30 million children -- use Google education apps like Gmail and Docs...

    Sad that the quality of our American classrooms' output still lags the last time I heard.

    1. Re:Impressive numbers; anemic output quality... by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Based on what?

  13. Start them early! by DogDude · · Score: 2

    If you're going to give all of the details of your entire life to Google in exchange for some minor convenience, why not start in grade school?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Start them early! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If you're going to give all of the details of your entire life to Google in exchange for some minor convenience, why not start in grade school?

      Starts before grade school. Ok, maybe Grade school before google itself spies on you, but with the likes of Spy-On-Me Elmo and No Privacy Barbie being connected to the internet for very young kids. (there was a case of one of these young kid, internet connected toys getting publicly hacked recently) your loss of privacy these days starts at birth.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Start them early! by rhabyt · · Score: 2

      Google gets no details from them in school. There are quite strict FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) regulations protecting the privacy of kids in school. Part of the reason that Google has won classrooms is that they are willing to put the dev time into security and anonymizing Chrome for schools. Though this is all about cost for school districts, a lawsuit over FERPA violations is part of the cost calculation. That said, ten years of learning to trust Google buys habits and loyalty, so when they step out of the protection of school, they will be open and innocent to the corporate surveillance that follows. Its the same smart investment in future customers that Apple once subsidized but then ditched.

    3. Re:Start them early! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There are quite strict FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) regulations protecting the privacy of kids in school.

      Fucking bullshit. If you have a google account, Google will track you. And you need a google account to make google docs.

    4. Re:Start them early! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      much before birth. Facebook and Google for sure have your sonograms.

  14. Reminds me of Apple II and early Macs in the '80s by filesiteguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My two sons are in high school. They use Google Docs, Android phones, and gmail for all school related work. They even submit papers using Google Docs and share using various Google tools.

    I have mentioned to many co-workers that Microsoft should be very worried about their hegemony in the office when this generation comes out into the workforce and doesn't demand Office or Windows on the desktop.

  15. Re:Company named Alphabet, classroom link by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    a coincidence? I think not.

    Surly APPLE should have the leg up on school linked names.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  16. Let's call it what it is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50,000 feet: "It puts Google, and the tech economy, at the center of one of the great debates that has raged in American education for more than a century: whether the purpose of public schools is to turn out knowledgeable citizens or skilled workers."

    50,000 feet: we're talking about the advertising economy.

    Google's business is advertising. Anything and everything they do is to boost that business. I don't give a shit what their public relations people say. Their revenues and subsequently PROFITS come from - ADVERTISING!

  17. May I introduce you to Ubiquiti? by zerofoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ubiquiti makes some really nice stuff - yes it is "enterprise lite", but for most schools, their network gear has the bases covered.

    After deploying TONS of UAP-AC-PROs ($130 each) and replacing lots of Meraki/Aruba/HP/Cisco gear - it's pretty hard to justify $800 to $1200 for an access point.

    Their EdgeMax series of products is also very impressive for the money.

    Brocade and Cisco have their place - but public education can get by with quite a bit less.

    1. Re:May I introduce you to Ubiquiti? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Depends on if you want to push SGT/SGACL to make use of both wired and wireless authentication with ISE. If you want to do that all of the way to the end-AP as a sort of wireless equivalent of a switch then you need to keep within the Cisco environment at least at the final access-edge. There are ways to jump across devices that don't support these features, but not at the end.

      My goal is to prevent end-workstations from communicating with each other, full-stop. That would significantly reduce the effectiveness of worms and other malware, such that if there are delays patching PCs or if zero-day exploits find their way in, the damage would be much reduced.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:May I introduce you to Ubiquiti? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over-engineered network to work around problems inherent in PCs. Step back and look at the big picture. Chromebooks don't need that sort of shit as they are much more hardened out of the box, so you can approach the networking differently as well. It also means you get multiple layers of savings. Believe me, I've been there and done that. The only problem is (for the IT guys) is that it works so well for so little money that it makes IT staff at schools almost completely redundant.

  18. So Google is collecting info on all our kids? by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

    I seriously do not like this.

    1. Re:So Google is collecting info on all our kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google, or sometimes Microsoft if you are in that sort of school system. But one way or another, yep.

      Welcome to the modern world, where you are under constant surveillance since childhood.

  19. Re:Company named Alphabet, classroom link by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    When i went to school, all of the computers in the CCSD were macs. i hated it.

  20. Google haters and privacy concerns by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've been using G Suite for Education at our school for a few years now, and it has been fantastic. It's exactly what schools need.

    Google clearly publishes a privacy policy here:

    https://edu.google.com/trust/

    Does Google sell school or student data to third parties?
    No. We don’t sell your G Suite data to third parties, and we do not share personal information placed in our systems with third parties, except in the few exceptional circumstances described in the G Suite agreement and our Privacy Policy, such as when you ask us to share it or when we are required to do so by law.

    Sometimes charity really is nothing more than charity - this seems to be the case here.

    1. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That covers third party, but it is safe to say, google is getting something out of this deal and that is massive amounts of data.

      As per their privacy policy (thanks for the link!)
      "Our automated systems analyze your content (including emails) to provide you personally relevant product features, such as customized search results, tailored advertising, and spam and malware detection."

      I am sure google would never do something as nefarious and collecting data based on keywords and then using the location of the school to target users outside the classroom with specific ads.

    2. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google is getting something out of this deal and that is massive amounts of data.

      Not only that, but it develops a whole generation of good little Google consumers already accustomed to giving all their data to Google.

      Controlling your own data? That's so 20th century.

    3. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by UncleRage · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure why this is so difficult for people to grasp.

      Google's privacy statement and stand on student privacy (no direct marketing/child's identity is not monetized) makes complete sense. They are fully within their rights to aggregate trends in a user base without deep mining individual data. The follow up (what I'm dealing with, for example) is the ability to migrate a G Suite for Edu account to a a personal account once the student graduates... at that point, they're fair game.

      Even within K-12, very few people up the management ladder have any concept of what's happening behind the scenes (and demonstrate that they really do not want to know).

      --
      #SickNotWeak
    4. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Good points. Our district has been moving into Google for about five years. We are getting to the point now where I have started doing work sessions with Seniors to discuss getting their data out when they graduate. Some of them have a large amount of Docs and other stuff. I'm reworking that curriculum to discuss things like data ownership and trying to give them options like Google Takeout so that they know that the choice to own the data or not is up to them once it is out of our edu domain.

    5. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this. I'm in the same boat. We switched several year ago and the impact on collaboration and ease of logins and access to student and teacher work has been so positive. That doesn't even get into tools like Google classroom.

    6. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by swillden · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this. I'm in the same boat. We switched several year ago and the impact on collaboration and ease of logins and access to student and teacher work has been so positive. That doesn't even get into tools like Google classroom.

      As a parent, I also like how easy it makes it for my kids to share their assignments with me. Especially on high school papers, it's great that they can say "Dad, I shared my essay, can you take a look at it?". I always just add comments rather than editing, except in trivial cases where I put my edits in as suggestions. The kid addresses my feedback, then shares it with the teacher, who, if they want, can see the edit history and tell me if I'm helping too much (none ever has, even when I point it out to them at parent-teacher conferences). Then I can see the teacher's comments after they've graded it (which often makes me want to argue with them, but I don't).

      That could all be done by emailing documents around, but it's so much smoother to have a single shared doc.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, nothing to worry about here giving all your info to Google- a giant advertising agency/terrorist organization.
      I'm sure the kids will thank you in the future for being so negligent.

    8. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by swillden · · Score: 1

      Terrorist organization? That's novel. Care to explain your rationale for that term?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Google haters and privacy concerns by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      That is the privacy policy for personal Google accounts. There is a separate legal agreement Google signs with school districts that governs privacy far more strictly. "7.4 Ferpa. The parties acknowledge that (a) Customer Data may include personally identifiable information from education records that are subject to FERPA (“FERPA Records”); and (b) to the extent that Customer Data includes FERPA Records, Google will be considered a “School Official” (as that term is used in FERPA and its implementing regulations) and will comply with FERPA." The "school official" language is very specific as to what information can be shared, and it is very strict.

  21. Somehow not a surprise / One catch by foxalopex · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I'm not sure how this is a surprise. Chromebooks are cheap, of reasonable quality and provide everything you need minus most of the viruses and problems with Windows. Administrators are also sure that kids arn't just flat out gaming on their Chromebooks (lack of space and video games) whereas on a PC you're never entirely sure. I'm sure a lot of us have heard kids or been kids who installed video games into the system.

    I mostly trust Google and believe they're mostly honest and in the Consumer's interest. The problem is while Google is trustworthy and reliable now, it's hard to say what will happen when Google's founders pass away and in the future which is why putting all your eggs in one basket is a dangerous thing, even if it's a great basket. Nothing we've made lasts forever.

    1. Re:Somehow not a surprise / One catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I mostly trust Google and believe they're mostly honest and in the Consumer's interest.

      I am a hen. There's a fox who has befriended me recently. He seems very nice. I mostly trust him and believe he has my interest at heart.

    2. Re:Somehow not a surprise / One catch by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      In this case, the fox has signed a legal contract.

  22. The out Apple'd Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Google basically just delivered what Apple had tried to deliver and failed with the eMate and 1st-Gen MacBook - a simple, cheap laptop for education.

    Apple is way too busy marketing "high-end" trendy crap to give a rip about education anymore.

    1. Re:The out Apple'd Apple by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      This is entirely true. I've been in educational technology long enough to remember when Apple specifically courted us because they needed us. But when the iPhone blew up, they just didn't need us anymore. They are still cordial, but their basic product design isn't exactly education-friendly anymore and they don't care.

    2. Re: The out Apple'd Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is addicted to big margins and to selling bling to upscale consumers. They also no longer have a big war chest to invest in the future, because they have quarantined a lot of their cash away from the developers and their legal team with their tax avoidance schemes. They are really at this point ripe for a large hostile takeover attempt.

  23. I, APK, "pwn" JOOgle... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads/script & malware rob speed/security/privacy

    Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!

    Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirects (99.999% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + lightens DNS load & resolves faster from local system RAM!

    * Via what u NATIVELY have in the IP stack in FASTER kernelmode!

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/

  24. I can tell you how they'll LOSE the classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last week or so the Classroom app stopped working with certain versions of iPad(don't ask me which ones, I don't use apple products, I'm just telling what I know). This is 2 weeks before the end of school in this area and Google just pissed off a ton of teachers who have to either buy a new ipad, or use the web interface(many can only use it while at school). I'm guessing the next recommendation will be to move away from Google products if they don't correct this soon. I get that they don't want to support older devices but they should have waited till July or so when school would clearly be out and everyone wasn't relying 100% on it.

    1. Re: I can tell you how they'll LOSE the classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the teachers should shitcan the iPads. The money from selling it off would pay for a nice upscale model of Chromebook.

    2. Re: I can tell you how they'll LOSE the classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple solution. Get rid of apple crap. It's made specificallyâ not to work with other tech

  25. Re:Company named Alphabet, classroom link by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

    Apple essentially abandoned the education market in the early to mid 2000's. I was working IT support at a school through the Apple resurgence and migration to Intel CPUs. The education discounts went from being very generous to 10%. No volume discounts, and they actively prohibited their dealers, who might be willing to work something out, from selling to schools. Any other PC manufacturer would knock of 40% with a purchase of 20 or more laptops. Apple's iPad managements tools were complicated and fraught with dead-ends and gotchas. From the get-go, Chromebooks were easy to manage and easy to reset to factory defaults, and were 1/4 the cost.

    The only company I hated dealing with more than Apple was Adobe.

  26. Not Surprising... by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    Chromebooks are cheap, and you can guarantee internet access in a fixed location like a typical American school.

    Most schools gravitate toward the cheapest thing that gets the job done.

    There will always be well-funded schools experimenting with new gadgets, but most places can't afford them. Especially when the bill comes in for their sporting equipment and facilities.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  27. Re:Company named Alphabet, classroom link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apples are for teachers. The Alphabet is for the students. See where they went wrong? All in the naming!

  28. to bad no one trains them on how to use it by vonshavingcream6184 · · Score: 1

    at least at our local schools they just plop the stuff in and expected everyone to know what to do. So it hardly ever gets used.

  29. Surely, they should use Windows instead by dschiptsov · · Score: 1

    and pay some ransoms time and again.

  30. Re:Company named Alphabet, classroom link by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    That must have been when Apple realized that there was no profit in low margin areas. And then started trying to exploit their name for Capitol gains. I'd say they did a rather good job as I type this from my iPhone. But imo the iPhone was the only product they have produced worth spending money on. I second your opinion on Adobe and Apple. And from the moment I read about chrome books and the fact they were going to be entry level priced I was intrigued. I don't however like the idea of turning people into marketing tools before they are old enough to legally sign a contract. Then again I'm sure that's most of the reason the hardware is as cheap as it is. Hopefully they will breed a generation of programmers that don't write shotty code like we see today.

  31. Re:Reminds me of Apple II and early Macs in the '8 by mjwx · · Score: 1

    My two sons are in high school. They use Google Docs, Android phones, and gmail for all school related work. They even submit papers using Google Docs and share using various Google tools.

    I have mentioned to many co-workers that Microsoft should be very worried about their hegemony in the office when this generation comes out into the workforce and doesn't demand Office or Windows on the desktop.

    I doubt Microsoft are that worried.

    They still control the enterprise with an iron fist and Google aren't anywhere near replacing O365, let alone on premise exchange. As long as there's no viable competitor to MS Office, they have the business market by the short and curlies.

    Also, Google didn't take the classroom from Microsoft, Apple took it from Microsoft. Google is taking it from Apple and its resulted in a marked increase in the quality of candidates. For the last 5 years, candidates for entry level positions have been leaving schools and universities with little to no knowledge on how to operate a computer. This is starting to turn around as they're at least rote memorising an interface that is similar to what they'll use in a workplace.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  32. Re:Reminds me of Apple II and early Macs in the '8 by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    As long as there's no viable competitor to MS Office, they have the business market by the short and curlies.

    Sorry, should have been more specific. I'm sure MS isn't worried *now* but they probably want to ensure the next generation grows up with Office. I work for a company with 77,000 O365 accounts - we pay some ridiculously low amount for each. That's all well and good for those of us in the workforce. However, the next generation may not look so favorably.

    <quote><p>Google is taking it from Apple and its resulted in a marked increase in the quality of candidates. </p></quote>Concur. As a hiring manager, I have had to wade through hundreds of less than stellar candidates over the years. Even those with CS degrees came out with few technical skills.
  33. Great for what it's great at... by jim_deane · · Score: 1

    I love some aspects of the ChromeOS on Chromebook environment. They're relatively fast despite the price, they don't usually break, anything that goes wrong can usually be fixed by a boot cycle or removing and re-logging-in the user.

    But as a physics teacher, there are applications and tools I need that are not replicated on Chromebooks. There is no usable equivalent to Tracker Video Analysis; support for probeware is minimal and hobbled; support for USB and serial-USB lab interfaces and data collection interfaces is lacking.

    As a result, I use the Chromebooks and Google Classroom for quite a bit of communication, sending documents, receiving assignments, and some data anlysis. My classroom computers are necessary to do the heavy hitting with Logger Pro, connecting Vernier hardware, Tracker, and occasionally some other esoteric tools. I'll have to keep them until something like a mature WINE environment is available in ChromeOS.