Mark Zuckerberg Is Working On a Way To Connect You To People You 'Should' Know (recode.net)

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Sunday shared some of what he has learned from his early trips around the country. Recode adds: The actual crux of the post comes later when Zuckerberg writes why he's taking on this new challenge. Basically: He's not running for office, he wants to find ways to strengthen Facebook's "community." Mark said, "I also think this is an area where Facebook can make a difference. Some of you have asked if this challenge means I'm running for public office. I'm not. I'm doing it to get a broader perspective to make sure we're best serving our community of almost 2 billion people at Facebook and doing the best work to promote equal opportunity at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. In many ways, relationships are the most important things in our lives -- whether we're trying to form healthy habits, stay out of trouble, or find better opportunities. And yet, research shows the average American has fewer than three close friends we can turn to for support." To make that difference Zuckerberg is talking about, he said that Facebook is helping people find people they already know but is also working on a way to connect you with people that you should know like mentors.

Comments

Sugar Daddies as a Service

[xxxJonBoyxxx]

>> working on a way to connect you with people that you should know like mentors

Couldn't help but think this would be, best case, trying to connect you with useless marketing "thought leaders", and worst case, connecting women with potential sugar daddies.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[Anonymous Coward]

I have different priorities I suppose as I would consider the thought leaders to be a worse case than the sugar daddy. This seems to be the natural course of progression though. First figure out who your friends are and what type of group dynamic it is "desirable" or "undesirable". Look at other group dynamics to find the ones with "desirable" traits ie consumerism. Subtly modify your group structure my addition of "desirable" influencers and removal of "undesirable" influencers. You might ask how "undesirable" influencers might be removed. It seems simple to my mind as facebook controls the newsfeed and could select what you see about people you aren't very close to maximum effect.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[Anonymous Coward]

It'll be a step forward from connecting tyrannical demagogues with analytics to steer the mentally retarded.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[Shotgun]

I don't like the way you talk about Instagram.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[cayenne8]

and worst case, connecting women with potential sugar daddies.

Well, there are already PLENTY of sites to hook up women with Sugar Daddys.

What got me from the article..was it said most people ONLY had 2-3 close personal friends?

Seriously?

I"m not on any social media and I have more that that that I trust with keys to my house.....

I have many long term friends, across the US from the my days "living abroad" in the US so to speak before settling down in New Orleans area years ago.

I wonder why people seem to have so few close friends? It is because of technology and social media? Is it due to people having their faces glued to a phone 24/7 rather than trying to meet and get to know real people in your vicinity in meatspace?

Hell, I see younger folks, gathered at a table, maybe even at a bar...and they've got their faces in their phones texting, instead of having a drink and interacting with the people with them there right in front of their noses....

I'm starting to think that all this social media is not only segregating people more, it is isolating them.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[Baron_Yam]

> it said most people ONLY had 2-3 close personal friends?

Yep. There's a whole spectrum between those people who treat everyone like their 'bestie' and the hermit who trusts nobody.

My standards for a 'close personal friend' are very high - I have lots of acquaintances but very few friends. Honestly, I have a lot of trouble understanding how people can say they have more than a handful of friends unless they're still in high school or have retired, because proper friendships take a lot of time and don't fit very well into a normal adult schedule. First there's work, then there's 'chores', then immediate family, then extended family, THEN friends. When? Every weekend or three?

Once you're seeing them once or twice a year, they're acquaintances, not friends.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[Anonymous Coward]

Many people prioritize friends over extended family, especially if extended family lives far away. And if some of the friends are from work or a shared hobby, that makes it a lot easier to stay in touch with multiple people.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[ccguy]

What got me from the article..was it said most people ONLY had 2-3 close personal friends?

Nothing wrong with that. It's a matter of the definition of close. I don't understand the concept of "non-personal friend" though. I probably have 3 close friends, and by close I mean I'm going to do whatever it takes to help them out and I know they're going to do the same for me. Then there's a few other people that are welcome to stay home if they need a place for any reason, and I would give them keys. But they are level below the former.

Re:Sugar Daddies as a Service

[cayenne8]

Nothing wrong with that. It's a matter of the definition of close. I don't understand the concept of "non-personal friend" though. I probably have 3 close friends, and by close I mean I'm going to do whatever it takes to help them out and I know they're going to do the same for me. Then there's a few other people that are welcome to stay home if they need a place for any reason, and I would give them keys. But they are level below the former.

Right now I can readily think of 9-10 people I put in the category of very close, personal friends that I would do whatever it takes to help them....

These are friends that I consider siblings really....

facebook - the creepy company

[Anonymous Coward]

enough said.

Re:facebook - the creepy company

[Anonymous Coward]

I wish he *would* run for public office. He'd be less destructive that way.

Re: facebook - the creepy company

[Anonymous Coward]

He would make Trump seem rather mild and bland.

no

[Anonymous Coward]

Ssweaty technocrat with a vision for society can fuck right off to snowballing Trump's cum with Peter Thiel.

To build relationships and form healthy habits...

[CrankyOldEngineer]

stay the hell away from social media. Just a thought.

You should know all these advertisers!

[Anonymous Coward]

They know so much about you they consider you their friend. Don't take away their freedom of making you be there friend!

Re:You should know all these advertisers!

[Anonymous Coward]

Exactly. If there's one thing you can be absolutely sure about regarding a for-profit business (and even some not-for-profits), it's that every single move they make is an attempt to increase profits. To be sure, each significant move will be accompanied by a statement describing how it's not an attempt to increase profits.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Rick Schumann]

Hear, hear.

Great

[Anonymous Coward]

Oh good, Zuckerberg is going to "fix" things again. That always works out so well.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[ausekilis]

I wish more people thought and felt this way. Text is one of the most impersonal ways to communicate with anyone. You lose all intonation, inflection, and other non-verbal cues.

With Facebook remembering every damned thing about us and reminding us of stuff, we've gone from actively remembering someones birthday and calling/gifting them with something to a "happy birthday!" damn-near autogenerated message on FB. For being a "social" media platform, I can't imagine a more anti-social way to acknowledge someone.

Go away, Zuckerberg

[Anonymous Coward]

What we really need is a way to make Zuckerberg and Facebook become irrelevant faster, so it'll go away and stop ruining our lives.
Same goes for Twitter, Instagram, and all over bullshit 'social media' nonsense.

Re:Go away, Zuckerberg

[Anonymous Coward]

A good first step is refusing to sign up, or if you already have signed up, refuse to communicate with anyone on that service.

The only way to fix this in the long run is social change, and that requires that people vote with their feet. The big risk however is that people will instead vote for something that isn't Facebook but is just as bad if not worse.

Re:Go away, Zuckerberg

[HornWumpus]

I don't want them to be irrelevant, they are a single destination for all of 'them', makes it easier to ignore the lot. Not unlike AOL of old.

If it wasn't for Facebook/twitter etc the signal to noise ratio on the rest of the net would be even worse. Facebook provides a service to all of us, whether we think their traffic is signal or noise, having it collected in a few places is a good thing. It's not like the vapid idiots looking for an audience ruined Facebook...that's all there ever was.

Re:Go away, Zuckerberg

[DontBeAMoran]

I vote for Geocities!

At least it was semi-technical groups of people with a shared hobby.

Re:Go away, Zuckerberg

[Anonymous Coward]

A good first step is refusing to sign up, or if you already have signed up, refuse to communicate with anyone on that service.

I've never gotten around to creating a FaceBook account. But I'd like to have some more good friends. If I though that FaceBook could actually introduce me to people that I would like to be friends with then I'd sign right up.

In a certain sense, I'd like to have friends that were nice and smart (i.e. the opposite of mean and stupid). But that's tricky to even define, let along actually find.

With respect to "nice", there's a fundamental question of whether the purpose of life is to do as much as you can for yourself (to be as selfish as possible) or to do as much as you can for others (to be as generous as possible). For me, a key part of being "nice" is being closer to the generous end of the spectrum than the selfish end of the spectrum.

With respect to "smart", there's a lot of people who don't want to look life directly in the eyes. And, in many ways, that's understandable: there's a lot of really messed up stuff out there in the world and if you're not careful it can burn away your soul - leaving behind nothing but a shallow empty shell. But there's a school of thought that true "Olympic gold medalists of mental health" are able to see life clearly in all it's vivid detail - while at the same time maintaining a positive mental attitude.

I'm not sure if anyone on this planet is perfect. The vast majority of people are "complicated" and "profoundly human". :) But there are some famous people out there on the internet who seem like they're genuinely interested in making the world a better place and they've thought deeply enough about their areas of expertise that they really do have some good ideas. My list of such people would include Paul Krugman (economics/inequality), John and Julie Gottman (marriage/relationships), John Cleese (creativity), Lawrence Lessig (law/technology), Heidi Rehm (genomics), and perhaps Linus Torvalds.

I wouldn't expect to become friends with any of these famous people, per se, but it would be very cool to have friends who were cut from the same cloth, so to speak. It would be fun to have conversations about the small and big problems of the world with thoughtful people who really cared.

Re:Go away, Zuckerberg

[Anonymous Coward]

Yours is not an unheard-of sentiment, but be aware: it's a dangerous sentiment to embrace; if something overall negative and destructive becomes too popular for whatever reasons, it becomes the de-facto 'normal'. Facebook is already more or less considered 'normal'. What we need to do now is make it unpopular, so people will move away from it. Luckily, in the case of so-called 'social media', it's just a matter of time before that happens, assuming it follows the path of it's predecessors: Myspace and Livejournal.

Re:Go away, Zuckerberg

[Anonymous Coward]

Social sign-on is a cancer. Many Very American John Smiths from Moscow were all about "MAGA" thanks to the hundreds of thousands of fake Twitter accounts.

Balkanize, distrust the idiot who tells you to delegate your identification/authentication to Facebook/Twitter/VK/GitHub/whoever, grow a pair of balls, and protect your users.

Re:Go away, Zuckerberg

[HornWumpus]

Why would you want Facebookers on the general net? Leave them in their ghetto.

The problem is the facebook users. They will turn anyplace they congregate into facebook. They are fine where they are.

You can't tell me the demise of AOL has made the net better...you can still recognize AOLers by their complete cluelessness. Walled garden people belong in walled gardens. The only thing missing is a _lock_ to hold them in the garden.

No thanks

[epyT-R]

I'll decide who I 'should' know.

Re: No thanks

[Anonymous Coward]

You can't unmeet someone, knowing is out of your control in all situations.

Re: No thanks

[Anonymous Coward]

ceiling cat disagrees

Re: No thanks

[epyT-R]

It isn't a question of 'unmeeting' someone. I could meet him and decide not to know him. The former is nearly instantaneous. The latter, which TFA was talking about, takes time.

I do not need zuckerberg to tell me who I 'should' like, emulate, or otherwise view as a 'mentor.'

Re: No thanks

[geekmux]

...I do not need zuckerberg to tell me who I 'should' like, emulate, or otherwise view as a 'mentor.'

Exactly right.

Besides, I'm fairly certain this will become some kind of game where we find those who have paid Facebook the most or have otherwise won the popularity vote become the "should know" group. Greed will likely find a way to fuck this gimmick up too.

I know....

[50000BTU_barbecue]

I should know people willing to give me a million dollars US. Get working on that!

Re:I know....

[Anonymous Coward]

Are you opposed to being hunted for sport? Asking for a millionaire friend.

Re:I know....

[Anonymous Coward]

I can bring gun too? Hunting someone unarmed is hardly sporting.

Re:I know....

[Anonymous Coward]

From: Dr.Goronyo Baba.

Satellite Tel: Note:Do not send emails.You can contact me directly on the tel.number or by sending me a satellite message stating your telephone number and email address contact on this number just given to you using the link online below. http://www.iridium.com/..there, you will see send a satellite message to my sat.tel.number- 881-631-410-574

Attn:President/C.e.o.

Strictly Confidential and Urgent Business Proposal.

Re: Transfer Of Usd $21,500.000{Twenty - One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Us Dollars Only.

I am a member of the Federal Government Of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (N.N.P.C). Sometime ago, a contract was awarded to a foreign firm in the Petroleum Trust Fund (P.T.F.) BY MY COMMITTEE.

This contract was over invoiced to the tune of us$ 21.5Million Dollars. This was done delibrately. The over - invoicing was a deal by my committee to benefit from the project. We not want to transfer this money, which is in a suspense account with the P.T.F. into any oversea account, which we expect you to provide for us.

Share:
60 % of the money would be for my partners and I. 30 % of the money would be yours, for providing us with logistics, which, would include a safe bank account, where we shall facilitate funds transfer into, as soon as documentations are concluded over here. 10 % of the money has been mapped out from the total sum to cover any expenses that might be incurred during the course of the transaction, (both local and international expenses).

If interested in assisting us, please contact me via my secured satellite tel number- 881-631-410-574, specially procured for this project, using the text message..

It may interest you to know that a similar transaction was carried out with one Mr. Patrice Miller, President of Crane International Trading Corp., of 153 East 57th St., 28th floor, N.Y.10022, Telephone: 212-308-7788 and Telex: 6731689. The deal was concluded and all covering documents, forwarded to Mr. Miller to authenticate the claims. Once the funds were transferred, Mr. Miller presented to his bank, all the legal documents and remitted the whole funds to another bank account, and disappeared completely. My colleagues and I were shattered, since such opportunities are not easy to come by.

Please, if you are interested in assisting us carry out to the fullest capacity, this transaction, we would require the following information from you which would enable us make formal application to the various ministries / parastatals, for the release and onward transfer of the money to your account.

1.Your Full Name, Company's Name, Address, Telephone and Fax Numbers. 2.Your Bank Name, Address. Telephone and Fax Number. 3.Your Bank Account Number and Beneficiary Name - You must be the signatory.

Please, note that we have strong and reliable connections at the Central Bank Of Nigeria and other Government Parastatals, hence assistance in this regards, would not be a problem. At the conclusion of this transaction, we shall use same contacts to withdraw all documents used in the course of this, to avoid any trace whatsoever that may ever arise, to you or to us, now and in the nearest possible future.

It might also interest you to know that we are mere civil servants who do not want to miss this opportunity, hence, we want this money transferred out, as soon as possible, before the newly democratically elected government ever think of making enquiries as regards the various activities of the past military government.

Kindly contact me as soon as possible, whether or not you are interested in this deal, so that whereby you are not interested, it would give us more room to scout for another partner. But if you are interested, kindly contact me via above email, telephone or fax, so that we can swing into action, as time is not on our part.

I wait in anticipation of your fullest co-operation. Yours Faithfully,

Dr.Goronyo Baba.

Send me your email address and tel.numberif interested for re- verification that you actually received this mail.

Re: I know....

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm very interested to speak with you. Could you call me at 901-303-3316. Ask for Nickolas. Thanks.

Re:I know....

[Anonymous Coward]

You'll get a 30 second head start. We're gentlemen, after all.

Not easily reduced to algorithm

[TWX]

I don't think defining who should be friends is something easily boiled-down to an algorithm.

Case in point, my local fandom scene has at least two major groups of people whose principal hobbies are in-common. These two groups have large numbers of members that despise people in the other group. Certainly there are crossovers who participate in both groups, but even with significant common-interest, similar outlook on life, and similar age and common peers these people absolutely are not each others' friends.

I've seen similar situations in auto enthusiast groups, in social dance scenes, in clubbing scenes, in firearms enthusiast scenes, etc. It's tough to say what will make people get along and what will divide them, and in many cases the people themselves probably can't really say.

Re:Not easily reduced to algorithm

[H3lldr0p]

Because it's not really about connecting people who should be friends. Don't let Zuck fool you.

This is about advertisement. Back a couple years ago, FB threw up its collective hands and told us we had to put people into categories since they couldn't get people to click on a nag-button. This is the next step in that. You've already been analyzed and habits tracked. Now you're going to be put into discrete groups so that the advertisers can target better.

See? This isn't about connecting people or bettering communications. This is about how FB makes money and returning all those billions that's been invested in it.

You and now the various groups you belong to are the product. Funny how the wheel has already turned from micro-targeting individuals to targeting broader groups. It's almost as if broadcasting was the best way to get potential customers' attention in the first place. Who knew we could and would ignore the individuation of advertisement?

Oh, wait. Everyone.

Re:Not easily reduced to algorithm

[epyT-R]

The article makes it sound like the social media equivalent of those public service announcements where famous actors sermonize about drug use.

This sounds like software that will look at your life algorithmically, 'decide' you're at risk for some activity deemed 'negative' by mainstream social conventions or lobby groups, and 'suggest' you friend those who promote activities antithetical to your 'problematic' behavior. I doubt this will have much impact as people who don't mindlessly follow the herd detest being lectured by the mindless. It'll just be one more annoying infestation.

I'm also sure this will align with zuckerberg's own political agenda. To use your examples, firearms club members would get suggestions to friend gun control lobby groups. Club sceners will get suggestions to friend anti-drug and anti-'rape' groups, etc.

Re:Not easily reduced to algorithm

[Actually, I do RTFA]

I've seen similar situations in...

It's common in most groups. As groups become more specialized, seemingly irrelevent details to those outside the community separate people into groups approaching holy war levels of disagreement. I mean, look at the freaking wars over text editors by a small group of people who objectively have more in common (by OS) than most of the population. I have no desire to repeat all the Linux arguments, but they continue to this day.

Re:Not easily reduced to algorithm

[Anonymous Coward]

This sounds like software that will look at your life algorithmically, 'decide' you're at risk for some activity deemed 'negative' by mainstream social conventions or lobby groups, and 'suggest' you friend those who promote activities antithetical to your 'problematic' behavior.

Like the absolutely continuous stream of pro-Hillary advertisements and stories that Facebook pushed at me for a year and a half leading into last November. I have three acquaintances and two family who thought she didn't deserve prison time from her public actions as secretary of state and older activities, but friends of friends of friends of those 5 completely flooded my news feed. So many "top stories" where the heading excuses presented to me read in the form of "[name I'd never heard of], a friend of [someone on my friends list], reacted to this comment."

How many here would pay to defecate on Zuck?

[Anonymous Coward]

Better to ask, who would not.

Re:How many here would pay to defecate on Zuck?

[amiga3D]

I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

study: the more you use FB, the worse you feel.

[Anonymous Coward]

A New, More Rigorous Study Confirms: The More You Use Facebook, the Worse You Feel

(Warning: if you visit the page without disabling javascript, it'll pop up some stupid shit instead of the article. At least it did for me, but disabling JS fixes it).

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[HornWumpus]

Text isn't terrible, it gives you time to think about what you write. Appropriate for some communications, sucks for others.

Running it all through a common pattern recognition system is insane, Doesn't matter if it's run by the KGB/NSA/MI5/Google/Facebook/Bavarian Illuminati/Jesuits/Scientologists (pick your paranoia) or all together.

No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

I got LinkedIn for that. Those 800+ connections are less likely to spam me with baby pics.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

They're also less likely to actually exist.

Re: No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

Better yet! If they existed they might bug me.

Re: No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

Better yet! If they existed they might bug me.

I get 20+ emails and phone calls per day even though I'm not doing an active job search. An active job search would triple that volume.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

All those contacts... and still only making 50k in the valley.

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

All those contacts... and still only making 50k in the valley.

I'm at the top of my salary range for virtual ditch diggers. That may have changed with the hipsters unwilling to drive no further than 30 minutes from San Francisco. I've seen pay rates for $30 to $45 per hour to work down south (San Jose/Sunnyvale/Santa Clara).

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

That was not the point being made. The point being made is that with all those contacts you still have a shittier job than college interns on this site. The fact that you have the top salary range for your shitty job has nothing to do with what was said.

OP - Those contacts can't help you get a better paying job - maybe whatever you use isn't working
You - My shitty job doesn't pay more

OP - Maybe eating a bowl of fat and walking slow doesn't work to lose weight
You - I'm 350lb. Here's a picture of me with no neck.

See the pattern? What is exactly the point of your replies?

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

The point being made is that with all those contacts you still have a shittier job than college interns on this site.

Which isn't a fair comparison. I never went to high school. I never got a four-year degree. The internship I did get at Fortune 500 company paid $10 per hour in 1997 when most internships went unpaid. I don't believe that Slashdot's demographics is limited to asshats with four-year degrees, overpaid internships and $200K per year salary for high-end IT jobs. I work the low-end of IT and my voice is just as important. Don't like it go read Reddit.

See the pattern?

You can't stop replying to my comments. Look for in the mirror to find your answers. The problem isn't me. The problem is YOU. On the bright side, I work for the government and I'm here to help you. :p

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

What the fuck are you talking about? I have replied to exactly one comment of yours - I guess 2 now. We don't like reddit either - that is why we are here. There are too many morons like you on Reddit, so we hang out here. I have to literally scroll through pages of you posting stupid uneducated shit or posting details of your loser life. Every fucking day.

If you didn't go to high school and didn't get at least a 4-year degree - guess what fuckfat? This is not a site for people like you.

No, we don't all make 200k. But I can tell you that all the people approaching 50 on here make at least 3x your salary. The people just starting out their careers are making your salary - and they don't talk about applying patches and doing helpdesk work. Their first job is already above that level.

I don't need to look in the mirror. I am the average reader of this site. You are the shitty loser spammer no one wants on here, who is abusing the open system we have put in place.

As far as you working for the govenment, so is the fat nig bitch at the DMV, and Leroy, the floor cleaner at the FBI headquarters. You are nothing but a retarder fat loser. Fuck off and go hang out with your own kind.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

>my voice is just as important

In the corporate world your voice is definitely not just as important - in fact it is neither counted, nor listened too, nor considered.

>I work the low-end of IT
This is not a website for "the low-end of IT"
This is a website people go to get away from "the low-end of IT"
You and your low-end buddies are not welcome here.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

Heavy Creamer telling a slashdotter to leave slashdot and go to Reddit. That's rich.

No stupid. It is you who needs to go. We are all just fine here - it is You that none of us want spamming our site. You don't get to tell us to leave. You are the piece of shit everyone wants out. Take your retard opinions and your shitty life story with you.

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

Every fucking day.

That's because I read every day. Get used to it. Or better yet, stop replying to my comments.

You are the shitty loser spammer no one wants on here, who is abusing the open system we have put in place.

Is that you, Commander Taco?

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

Your voice is not important. You spend your work hours posting on slashdot and you actually think this is ok to do. That alone makes your voice and opinion worth nothing.

Go tell your boss how many hours you spend spamming here daily while he is paying you and see if your thoughts and opinions are correct.

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

In the corporate world your voice is definitely not just as important - in fact it is neither counted, nor listened too, nor considered.

Actually, it is. As a team lead or project leader, my voice gets heard.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm not taco, but I have been on this site since 1997. You can certainly read every day, but you spam offtopic bullshit every day - that is not reading.

So, let me get this straight. You post bullshit and your solution is to have people replying to your bullshit? To have slashdotters leave their site? Do you come to a party at someone's house because the door was open and when everyone bitches that you are an annoyance you tell them to leave?

Go fuck yourself you fat fuck. We can't make you leave, but we are certainly going to keep shitting all over you. You spend 90% of your time complaining about people dissing you, that everyone is an asshole to you, then you blog about how everyone keeps making fun of you on slashdot. That is one sad fucking life. We'd like to keep it that way.

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

We can't make you leave, but we are certainly going to keep shitting all over you.

Then I will continue to piss on you, day in and day out. Or you can stop replying to my comments.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

A team leader of what? Applying patches to people's PCs? Yes, that is important - a shit job stupid people do at the low end of IT, but those patches aren't going to apply themselves. It's just not something we on slashdot do. This week I am working on merging a cached global NAS with a local DR-replicated NAS into a single solution. Around q3 I am going to purchase $2 mil worth of equipment and start migrating the storage. You are literally too stupid to provide me any useful information.

Whatever team your are leading and whatever projects you are working on - you are heard by other people at your level. Which is not the level of other slashdot readers. So no - your voice is not heard here. You are an annoying uneducated spammer.

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

Which is not the level of other slashdot readers.

I would love to see the demographic data for Slashdot and crosscheck it with the data I've collected on my websites.

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

Go tell your boss how many hours you spend spamming here daily while he is paying you and see if your thoughts and opinions are correct.

I could but he wouldn't do anything about it. As a contractor, he can tell me what needs to be done but he can't tell me how to do it. Otherwise, under IRS rules, I would have to be paid like an employee. As long as I get my numbers (I'm the top three in the department), he doesn't care what I do between tasks.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

How about the demographic of how many replies to your comments have a valid discussion vs how many you talk about your shitty life? How about the % of replies to your comments telling you loser fat ass to get off our site? I bet you got the highest percentage of any slashdot reader in the history of this site.

Oh, I forgot. It's apparently 12 people that have singled you out who are doing this and everyone else loves you.

Re:No thank you....

[__aaclcg7560]

I bet you got the highest percentage of any slashdot reader in the history of this site.

No. I'm consistently up voted more than I'm down voted by the mods. You can check out my stats below.

Pages Processed: 604, Comments (Accepted/Total): 9037/9059
Oldest Date: 2008-08-04, Newest Date: 2017-05-22
Scores (8893) | -1: 74, 0: 366, 1: 6750, 2: 981, 3: 390, 4: 323, 5: 157
Bonuses (1227) | Flamebait: 31, Funny: 295, Informative: 197, Insightful: 325, Interesting: 261, Offtopic: 44, Redundant: 11, Troll: 63
Total Time: 00:14:17.00

BTW, For the asshat who gave me crap about the performance of my Python script, I'm using threads and queues to shave 11 minutes off the running time.

It's apparently 12 people that have singled you out who are doing this and everyone else loves you.

A half-dozen.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

"piss on me" - redefined by Creamer as "I don't have a comeback - here are some more details about how shitty my life is - but I'm happy with it."

"shit on you" - defined by us as "you stupid fat short-bus loser who is too old to fix his life"

One of those definitions is not what You think it is.

Re:No thank you....

[dorkyElitist]

You have a very high opinion of a site that makes stackoverflow look like the Oracle of Delphi. I have read on this site for a few years, and it was only technically enlightening when I couldn't even write a FOR loop. And it's not even a signal versus noise thing, there just isn't any in-depth discussion besides opinionated junk. Granted, this is more cogent discussion than 4chan, but reddit is probably a close comparison. At least have the balls to log in if you are going to make fun of someone's weight. You would think some random dork would be attuned to that sort of empathy, but maybe you have had sand kicked in your face one too many times.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

"The Mods?" Most of slashdot is viewed on a phone in the elevator or toilet, and most people don't bother creating an account or logging in. Also, most people read at -1 and don't mod. This is slashdot - not Reddit. Your "mod" stats (why the fuck would anyone write a script to collect mod stats) are a joke

You know what I see when I look at your post history? You being personally attacked literally more than anyone I have seen on this site. And that tells me it's you, and that it's not a "half-dozen" people. If it is only 6 people, it's now 7. I'm going to take a shit on you daily as a part of my daily routine on the shitter.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

Every moron has a boss and a team. I highly doubt Anyone on you team of low-skilled fools, or the boss of you fools is on slashdot sharing their stupid with us. It's just you - the stupid fat spammer, who for some reason decided the place to hang out is a site specifically for people unlike him.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

Honest question: Going to retard-school instead of highschool, not being able to pull through college, and only having a low-paying "virtual ditch digger" job after 20 years of experience. Why would you think you are one of us smart ugly antisocial geeks? Because you're extremely unattractive like us?

We all went to school, we are people who were in the honor's classes and got straight As. This is a site specifically for these people. You seem to have invited yourself and enjoy annoying everyone. Do you also go onto physics forums and offer your opinion about boson discovery? Do you go onto a forum for young mothers and offer breast feeding tips? Why are you here man?

And by the way - no, it is not late at night where I am, and I am not drunk, and I have Always until now simply scrolled through your comments, and no, I am not an Asshat - I am an Asshole to You specifically in response to your posts.

Re: No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

Hey bro - you're a Genuinely Bad Person(tm). Just wanted to let you know.

Re: No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

Can you just stop spamming? No one fucking cares that you think you're so damned superior to a regular working class IT guy.

It's pretty safe to assume that the software you write - if you actually write any - is semiliterate bug-ridden spaghetti code. I'm sure daddy paid for you to go to an elitist private school. Whatever job you hold, if you actually work, you landed through nepotism.

Re:No thank you....

[Anonymous Coward]

I have some collage and an AS from ITT Tech (embarrassing enough). I started as a virtual ditch digger and worked my way up to System Admin work, very specialized. I also moved from Windows to Linux SysAdmin work.
It takes time and alot of those avenues are closing due to assholes like you.
I regularly outperform other Admins, because I've done the grunt work and my experience with different systems gives me a serious boost.
I'd take 1 Criemer over a dozen " people who were in the honor's classes and got straight As". Those guys don't know what they don't know. They are like the H1B workers Slashdot loves to denigrate. Mostly lies, hot air, and bravado. Truthfully, most people are.

It ain't gonna work...

[QuietLagoon]

Facebook engineers are too enamored with the algorithm, and not the results of the algorithm. Case in point, nearly every time I go on to facebook, I have to tell it that I want the items on my newsfeed "most recent first" and not sorted by what facebook thinks I should see first. So if facebook engineers can't get something as simple as "chronological order" correct, what hope is there for them to get this new zuck-wet-dream correct?

Re:It ain't gonna work...

[Anonymous Coward]

You fix the sorting "nearly every time". In a few months, you'll fix it "most of the time." Give it another month or two after that, and it will be "occasionally", and then "why did I ever change the sort order, I love the default."

Embrace the future my good man!

Re:It ain't gonna work...

[Anonymous Coward]

Thats because Facebook wants to control the trends and keep you on Facebook. If Facebook showed you things that were current it would make you more aware of whats happening currently. Facebook could care less if your aware of current events. Facebook wants to increase your time on the page with your particular bubble of interests.

Re:It ain't gonna work...

[Anonymous Coward]

You are confusing the will of product management for whims of an engineer.

Re:It ain't gonna work...

[QuietLagoon]

...You fix the sorting "nearly every time". In a few months, you'll fix it "most of the time."...

It's been a few months already. Over a year, that I distinctly remember, probably longer. I see no hint that the behavior is changing over time. This is a simple two-choice option, and facebook can't get it right.

Re:It ain't gonna work...

[Anonymous Coward]

not sorted by what facebook thinks I should see first.

You're being naÃve. You do realize that they're being paid to put that order first? It's just advertising and you're the product. FB doesn't give a flying fuck about your preferences unless there's a danger you might actually leave.

Re:It ain't gonna work...

[ayesnymous]

I put everything in a custom list, and that list is sorted automatically most recent at the top, and they don't exclude anything. The newsfeed is for clueless people.

Re:It ain't gonna work...

[Anonymous Coward]

Give them some credit. If they wanted to give that as an option you can save, they would have.
They'd also treat them as two options, instead of a main one and a lesser one ("Viewing most recent stories. BACK TO top stories")
They want to get everyone on the newsfeed which can be used to influence people.
Newsfeed is prebuilt, have you noticed how "most recent" takes a lot longer to show ?

Heh

[Anonymous Coward]

Suddenly every white is introduced to Richard Spencer and /pol/, what could go wrong?

No.

[sqorbit]

I don't like half the people I know already. I'm pretty sure there's no one else I "should" know.

Re:No.

[Quirkz]

The pickier you are, the more help you need being introduced to the right people. Robot friendship matchmaking might just be right for you.

they already have this...

[bobmajdakjr]

i hit ignore on all the people in the sidebar all the time...

Re:they already have this...

[Anonymous Coward]

The Facebook Panopticon series suggests that they already have this and have been doing it for years. And their cell phones listen in on nearby conversations to serve you targeted ads, and they check for nearby phones so they can connect journalists to their confidential sources. And all of your personal data may have made its way to foreign intelligence agencies through those "marketing" networks, but that is another story.

Re: To build relationships and form healthy habits

[Anonymous Coward]

This is a great argument for Facebook's desire to incorporate more video into their site. They're trying to move away from text, and based on your views, this is a good idea.

...ways to strengthen Facebook's "community."

[Anonymous Coward]

"ways to strengthen Facebook's community"

-Shadow ban everyone who signs up from a nigerian IP address
-Shadow ban everyone who uses known copypasta 'love letters' or what have you
-Ability to auto-hide posts containing letter u used as a word
-Flag people who use it with a 'moron' badge displayed prominently on their profile.
-Other badges can be handed out for people who post insane alt-right stories, what they ate for every meal, feminazi crap, people who use portrait mode for videos, like-farmers, and those crazy free-energy guys.
-Display a clock on you profile that shows the total time you've spent on facebook, counting up.
-Display an estimate total time of your remaining life expectancy below it, counting down.

Re:...ways to strengthen Facebook's "community."

[Anonymous Coward]

Facebook definitely has no interest in implementing the last two of your suggestions.

Screw people I "should" know

[Vermonter]

I don't even want to connect with most of the people I already *do* know... why one Earth would I want to add another person to my social network that I obviously don't care enough about to have already gotten to know?

Recommending like minded people

[HockeyPuck]

How is this different than matchup ads with viewer preferences? Now instead of some random ad or product, I'm being matched up with some person. This can't end well when a bunch of gold digging 20-somethings get matched up with married men.

Or we all get matched up with people that think like us and the diversity of opinion goes down even more. We already have seen this on FB with regards to posts or news articles.

Re:Recommending like minded people

[Anonymous Coward]

This can't end well when a bunch of gold digging 20-somethings get matched up with married men.

Why not? Maybe everybody does end up happier in that situation.

Please God no

[paiute]

Someone keep this idea-stealing punk from connecting people to me.

Facebook's People you know is f#$ked up anyways...

[SirTreveyan]

I currently use Facebook to stay in contact with a few friends I PERSONALLY know. I am not into collecting "friends" from around the world whom I have never met, nor have any intention of ever meeting. I want to know why is Zuckerberg doing this? The current "People You Might Know" is fucked up. I understand why friends of my friends show up or people who live within a few miles of me being on my list, but why do I get people that have no link what so ever to me show up on my list. I do not understand why people who live on the other side of the planet, whose name is in a language I can not identify, let alone understand shows up in this list! I do not care if they are 5 or 6 levels of "friends" out, I don't want them on my page! When I click to remove them, they show up again when the damn page refreshes. If I take the time to remove them, how about eliminating them permanently???? So fuck who I "SHOULD" know, lets get people who I "MIGHT" personally know working right first!!!!

Sound off if your on Facebook

[wjcofkc]

Note: I am not sounding off.

Re:Sound off if your on Facebook

[neo-mkrey]

Also no sounds coming from me.

Re: Sound off if your on Facebook

[Anonymous Coward]

I had a facebook account in the name of my dog once, to check out Farmville. That sort of counts, right?

Sextorters?

[Anonymous Coward]

How does this tie in with the previous headline?

Facebook Flooded With 'Sextortion' and Revenge Porn, Files Reveal

Re:Facebook's People you know is f#$ked up anyways

[Anonymous Coward]

I currently use Facebook to stay in contact with a few friends I PERSONALLY know. I am not into collecting "friends" from around the world whom I have never met,

So why not just email or instant message them? Why do you feel the need to put a for-profit ad company between you and your friends?

Re:Facebook's People you know is f#$ked up anyways

[Anonymous Coward]

I currently use Facebook

Hey everybody. See! A talking product!

Facepunim

[Anonymous Coward]

Jews all know each other anyway.

Echo Chamber

[Anonymous Coward]

Yes, let's just put ourselves into our own echo chamber that Facebook thinks we should like. Nothing good has ever happened by being introduced to someone or something that might not normally match our profile.

Re: To build relationships and form healthy habits

[GiedriusTrump]

ðY

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Anonymous Coward]

Text isn't terrible, it gives you time to think about what you write.

After reading the 3AM twitter rants from the President of the United States, I'd argue against this theory.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Gr8Apes]

With Facebook remembering every damned thing about us and reminding us of stuff

There's likely a reason we're not "linked" to someone we should know, and why we don't remember certain things Disclaimer: I have no idea what all FB does these days, I've never participated on FB for anything other than work related purposes. I find their interface to suck horribly, and can't imagine why I'd ever want to expose myself to that on any kind of schedule.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[HornWumpus]

Having the time to think is not the same as taking it.

Facebook Friend Bubbles

[PineHall]

It looks like to me he is wanting to reinforce those Facebook friend bubbles. For the most part my Facebook friends reinforce what I believe and what I think is right. I do not see the differing opinions. Actually I have a few outlier 'friends' that help give me a broader perspective, but for the most part my 'friends' reinforce what I believe.

I do not think this is good for any country.. I think the thing to do is not to reinforce our bubbles but to break them down some with thoughtful alternative viewpoint posts (news articles). We need to see the other side and break down the caricatures . Conservatives need to hear what those Liberals are thinking, and the Liberals need to hear what the Conservatives are thinking. It may not be popular but I think it would be good for the country and world. This is what would really build community.

Re:Facebook Friend Bubbles

[Anonymous Coward]

... Liberals need to hear what the Conservatives are thinking.

OK, so let's say some gullible friend tells you how excited he is because some Nigerian prince wants to send him a million dollars. Unless you're equally gullible, you're going to have a pretty clear idea of what your friend is thinking and you're going to have a pretty clear idea of what the "Nigerian prince" is thinking. So why do you need to hear that?

As a liberal, I suppose I could listen to some poor Trump voter tell me about how Trump is going to bring coal mining jobs back from China. But what's the point? It was always blatantly obvious that Trump was lying his ass off about the coal mining jobs and that now he's going to aggressively reduce a lot of the government services that the poor people depend on in order to cut his own taxes.

Rich people are mean (to poor people). Poor people are stupid (for trusting the rich people). News at 11!

This isn't about poor people needing to be "heard". This is about poor people needing to get their heads out of their asses.

What an altruist

[Anonymous Coward]

a true philanthropist

"Community"

[Anonymous Coward]

A true community is a group of equals with shared values, not a bunch of user profiles whose only common feature is having all their communications intercepted and stored by a creepy billionaire.

And I am working on a way

[Anonymous Coward]

I am working on a way to connect my foot with his ass..

Re:Facebook's People you know is f#$ked up anyways

[NeoMorphy]

I have the exact same problem.

It seems like a large portion of suggested friends are from the Middle East, Africa, South America, etc. Some of them are using character sets I have never seen before. Even when they use iso8859-1, it's not in a language I know. Some of them look like advertisement for porn, both gay and straight. It's so bad I am wondering if negative correlations are accidentally being included.

I've complained twice now to customer support, but I'm pretty sure they do not care.

And everyone gets connected to Kevin Bacon.

[toonces33]

I saw that coming..

More Marketing Speak

[AnalogDiehard]

This has nothing to do with "strengthening the Facebook community" and everything to do with bringing more customers to advertisers.

I grew very weary of advertising years ago and I use every tool to remind Facebook to leave me alone. Facebook nags me to complete my profile but there are certain things I refuse to put there. Facebook likes to broadcast products and services that my friends "liked" in my feed. Facebook uses my data to target marketing based on my interest and preferences. When those ads disguised as "suggested posts" appear in my feed, I make it a point to mark every single one as spam. The ads stop for a while then re-appear, but this is the longest I have gone without seeing them.

Re:More Marketing Speak

[JohnFen]

This has nothing to do with "strengthening the Facebook community" and everything to do with bringing more customers to advertisers.

Connecting advertisers to Facebookers is strengthening the Facebook community. What else is Facebook for if not that?

His wife is Chinese, right?

[Anonymous Coward]

His Jewish grandmother would have told him he shouldn't have anything to do with her. He'll say this generation isn't prejudiced. Bollocks. Every generation is prejudiced, just in different ways. His notion of who should be with who is just as good as *my* Jewish grandmother's distaste for my Catholic father--who stayed married to my father for over 50 years and remained true to the "until death do us part" clause.

No. Just no.

[JohnFen]

In many ways, relationships are the most important things in our lives

I agree. Which is why it's important, for the sake of our relationships, to avoid Facebook.

if this ends up like linked in

[Anonymous Coward]

I'll deactivate my account just like i did my LI account. that's some seriously creepy shit.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Anonymous Coward]

I just want to say hey you people who almost always post memories from X years ago, fuck all of you in particular.

I should know a bunch of babes

[Anonymous Coward]

Make it happen, Zuck!

Facebook is for idiots - confirmed...

[Anonymous Coward]

Yet again!

The Arrogance of Big IT

[Anonymous Coward]

And here I thought it was annoying when Microsoft Word keeps thinking it *knows* what word I'm trying to type or how I want things formatted.

Automation that is intrusive and less than 99.9% correct is far more annoying and disruptive to my work than not having artificial intelligence constantly diving in my way thinking it is helping.

Re:The Arrogance of Big IT

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

And here I thought it was annoying when Microsoft Word keeps thinking it *knows* what word I'm trying to type or how I want things formatted.

I have often said that the greatest impediment to creating documents in Microsoft Word is Microsoft Word.

So Tindr but for friends?

[Anonymous Coward]

Doesnt Facefarm already do this?

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Anonymous Coward]

I got engaged over text 1/2 way around the world. Happily married today, 4 years.

Fuck Mark Zuckerberg

[JustAnotherOldGuy]

"Mark Zuckerberg Is Working On a Way To Connect You To People You 'Should' Know"

Fuck you, Mark. Stop trying to fiddlefuck your way into my good graces by telling me who I "should" know. Just go take your billions and fuck off to Fuckoffville.

I don't have a Facebook account and at this rate I'll beat anyone to death with a baseball bat who says I "gotta have one".

In closing, blow me, get off my lawn, and turn down that shitty music!

Let me guess

[OYAHHH]

A stock broker I should know. A life insurance salesman I should know. A long lost relative who is willing to leave me $4,000,000 I should know.

Spare me Zuckerburg. i'll decide who I want to know, not your marketing machine.

Connect this!

[Anonymous Coward]

The irony is written by a guy who fucked over his friends from the very beginning.
/captcha aborted

Make a hot new friend

[Anonymous Coward]

Make a hot new friend with a Hawaiian volcano, Cuckerberg.

the only people I *should* know

[Anonymous Coward]

I haven't felt the need for a friend in decades. I want good sex partners and good professional technical partners. For me, sex partners are exclusively female, and professional partners are of either sex but also exclusively not sex partners.

Are they working on that?

I quit Facebook years ago because it brought a bunch of useless acquaintances back into my life.

Invite me to a Superbowl party? You aren't someone I should know. Fuck me during the Superbowl while we're the only people in the house... yes, I should know you.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Anonymous Coward]

Text is one of the most impersonal ways to communicate with anyone. You lose all intonation, inflection, and other non-verbal cues.

Don't worry. They have emoji to make up for that.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Anonymous Coward]

On what fricking planet did you grow up on???? Oh, let me guess, a planet where social media didn't exist yet right? Newsflash: This post is more grammatically correct than half of the posts made on social media daily. Yes, you could think about what you are writing, but more often than not, most people will post something that will leave you wishing for an imgur link.

As for the people you "should" know, if you need scumbag like [expletive]burg telling you who to idolize or who your friends should be, you deserve the result of whatever he picks for you. Actually, no I take that back. You don't deserve even that much, because you couldn't even form a relationship on your own, you had to be TOLD: "This is who you are." I hope that works out for you, and I won't bug you about the ridiculous amount of power over your life you just gave up, but if it doesn't work out, remember this: You deserve nothing in life, because you had to be a follower.

So is this really a different way

[Plumpaquatsch]

So is this really a different way from Facebook repeatedly telling me I should follow the Great Leader himself?

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[Miser]

Seconded. The only winning move is not to play. I suppose, SUPPOSE that it is a good way to keep in touch with folks you don't talk to often, however if you really need to get in touch with me, I am for the most part able to be found if you know my real name. Email me. Call me. How novel!

I enjoy the reactions I get from people when they ask "Are you on Facebook?"

"No."

[blank stare like I just spoke to them in a language they don't understand]

Already working in reverse

[Anonymous Coward]

Facebook already foils the social networks of people it considers subversive, by making their feeds mysteriously unavailable, their live video for some reason not play or not show up in notifications, making sharing their links be mysteriously unsuccessful, etc. They could easily also be failing to connect people they consider dangerously redpilled by failing to introduce them to each other in "people you might know", not suggesting groups they consider purveyors of "fake news", etc. There are likely more, less obvious things they can do, too, now that they've anointed themselves ministry of truth.

Thank Thor we don't have eternal life!...

[Anonymous Coward]

...so we don't have to put up with such BS and social media crap forever.

Two years away from Facebook and counting.

Re:To build relationships and form healthy habits.

[HornWumpus]

Grammar is for clarity _only_. Ungrammatical, but clear is perfectly fine.

As I said to sib, having time to think doesn't force you to think. For example you had time to think about your post...