Slashdot Mirror


Baking Soda Shortage Has Hospitals Frantic, Delaying Treatments and Surgeries (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Amid a national shortage of a critical medicine, US hospitals are hoarding vials, delaying surgeries, and turning away patients, The New York Times reports. The medicine in short supply: solutions of sodium bicarbonate -- aka, baking soda. The simple drug is used in all sorts of treatments, from chemotherapies to those for organ failure. It can help correct the pH of blood and ease the pain of stitches. It is used in open-heart surgery, can help reverse poisonings, and is kept on emergency crash carts. But, however basic and life-saving, the drug has been in short supply since around February. The country's two suppliers, Pfizer and Amphastar, ran low following an issue with one of Pfizer's suppliers -- the issue was undisclosed due to confidentiality agreements. Amphastar's supplies took a hit with a spike in demand from desperate Pfizer customers. Both companies told the NYT that they don't know when exactly supplies will be restored. They speculate that it will be no earlier than June or August. With the shortage of sodium bicarbonate, hospitals are postponing surgeries and chemotherapy treatments. A hospital in Mobile, Alabama, for example, postponed seven open-heart surgeries and sent one critically ill patient to another hospital due to the shortage.

40 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. The Free Market at Work by bobschneider8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this shortage happening in countries with "socialized medicine", or just in free market America?

    1. Re:The Free Market at Work by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are always shortages - it's just not apparent to the average Slashdotter. This page lists current and past drug shortages going back to 2010.

      Here's the Canadian version.

      There seems to be a similar site for the EU, though the page says most shortages are handled by the individual national governments. I'd check the French or German health websites, but I'm not good in those languages. The UK seems to have ceased tracking shortages.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:The Free Market at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "free market" never existed, it's a construct of man's imagination, but let's set that aside for a moment while we talk about something more serious - Life or death serious. Health care. Physicians follow a code to do no harm. Drug companies have no such compunctions. There is no business imperative, regulation, general guideline or established best practice to maintain production of CRITICAL, EVERYDAY PRODUCTS that the world needs lots of. There is NO safety net. There is no planned economy government entity saying "well, if we really need to have bicarb, we need to make it ourselves and maintain that production capability." There is nothing like that for any substance except petroleum.

    3. Re:The Free Market at Work by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is this shortage happening in countries with "socialized medicine", or just in free market America?

      We don't have a free market medical system. We have a cronyist monopoly enforced by laws written by hospitals and pharma company. If the medical system produced computers, a PC would cost about the same as a Lamborghini.

    4. Re:The Free Market at Work by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >"Is this shortage happening in countries with "socialized medicine", or just in free market America?"

      If we had a really free market (with safeguards to prevent monopolies or near-monopolies), then plenty of other companies would make such "drugs" available, too (in this example, it is not really a drug, it is just a commodity). Besides, even if a shortage occurred in such a market, it would send the price up and other companies would rush to market with completing product and pricing would go down and supply would then increase then eventually stabilize.

      In a perfectly free and elastic economy (and part of that freedom *is* preventing monopolies with take away from free trade), supply and demand and pricing is completely self correcting. If anything, the more "socialized" a place is (with more government controls on supply and demand, limiting competition, restricting price changes, tampering with demand) the more likely shortages will occur.

      No system is perfect. But free markets have generally been proven to work better than anything out there.

    5. Re:The Free Market at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is literally the Free Market at work.

      It purchased legislators to bypass the concept of being regulated.

    6. Re:The Free Market at Work by martinX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Happens in Australia, too. We have a large, well developed public hospital system in each state.
      http://www.smh.com.au/national...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    7. Re:The Free Market at Work by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that medical services may require economies-of-scale such that having say 7 competitors in a given market, especially rural areas, is just not realistic. Medical services are just not the same market profile as manufacturing light-bulbs.

      Personnel are not even so much the problem. Medical salaries are only a small percentage of total costs, and if a real shortage develops we could always turn on the H-1B spigot.

      It's more about the total opaqueness of all pricing: nobody knows what anything costs. Pharma keeps insisting that "nobody actually pays $120,000 for Harvoni." My brother didn't, for example - but what did his insurance plan actually pay for it, and why aren't we allowed to find out? And if nobody actually pays it, why is that the advertised price?

      We expect higher prices for newly branded compounds, but how can the supply of generic drugs, which anyone can make, be monopolized? What can't we have our prescriptions filled on the world market, through Amazon?

    8. Re:The Free Market at Work by martinX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well expressed. I recently looked into the price of rattlesnake antivenin in the US and was astounded to see it costing up to $10000 per vial. A little searching revealed the cost of production was estimated to be about $14.
      Link to an article discussing the costs:
      http://www.smithsonianmag.com/...

      Link to a research paper by the person responsible for creating the antivenin:
      https://www.researchgate.net/p...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    9. Re:The Free Market at Work by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but a lot of people would have those Lamborghinis. You wouldn't just buy a computer though. You'd make computer payments. You wouldn't just buy stuff online. You'd make a $0.50 copay for each $100.00 iTunes or Netflix purchase because nobody actually buys directly from online retailers. I'm just guessing at what things cost, because the price list is secret. You could apply for a new computer right around the same time every year, along with a bunch of other people, unless your computer broke down our you got married, or needed a computer for your child, or Congress had gas. Then it's hard to say. You wouldn't be on the internet unless it was in your network. Maybe your state would only support the Bing network, unless you wanted to pay a lot extra. You could Google if you really wanted to; but then your next computer payment would be higher. You get free antivirus though, so you use that to feed some kind of delusion that this is all working out for the best. Sometimes reality intrudes and you get depressed. Then you fork over a copay for a program from Big Gaming that may or may not cause your computer to self-destruct. If that happens, it's GAME OVER.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    10. Re:The Free Market at Work by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tired meme. Venezuela failed because they married their economy to oil. Narrow product focus can also mess up capitalism. In fact, Adam Smith's "Comparative Advantage" encourages putting too many eggs in too few baskets. It can be quite profitable in the shorter term, but bite hard later. Focusing on "big ticket" manufacturing slammed the USA "rust belt", for example, because it stopped being their comparative advantage.

    11. Re:The Free Market at Work by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 4, Informative

      That system exists, and it's why medical billing is a speciality in and of itself. It's called the ICD-10, and has been around for decades. The pushback is because the latest revision, which went into effect two years ago, is hyper-specific to the point of absurdity.

      Pecked by a chicken? There's a code for that: W61.33. But don't you dare get that confused with getting pecked by a turkey or bitten by a duck, which are W61.43 and W61.61 respectively. Don't like your in-laws? That's Z63.1. Injured? It's very important for proper diagnosis to know if you were at the library at the time (Y92.241) or at the opera (Y92.253). Shredding it on water so awesomely that your skis catch on fire? Not only is there a code for that, there are three sub-codes to describe the diagnosis in greater detail. I am not making this up.. You know all those Imperials who died when those two Star Destroyers collided in Rogue one? That's V95.43. And it only gets more wacky from there.

      Now do you see why there's been some pushback?

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    12. Re:The Free Market at Work by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Right but that's dodging the question isn't it?

      Not at all - I provided some resources to help people get started answering that question. I'm not gunning for a PhD, so I'm not going to do the study myself :)

      confirms that the shortage is due to a contractual dispute

      My public school had a strike when the teachers walked out for a contractual dispute. Government is not immune from this.

      The UK's NHS typically does quite well at ensuring supply,

      We'll never know if that is true or not, since they deliberately stopped tracking shortages.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by Thelasko · · Score: 2

    My local Office Depot has some "Commercial Grade" Baking Soda available, made by some other supplier named "Arm & Hammer". It's in stock, and $1.39 for a pound of it.

    I think the summary neglected to mention this is "Pharmaceutical Grade" baking soda. Which would need approval from the FDA to be used as medicine.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  3. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Purity.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  4. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Purity. Guaranteed absolutely free of anything that could be dangerous if injected.
    2. Sterility. No microbes. Hermetic seal container made free of life at the factory.
    3. A paper trail saying where it was made, when, and who shipped it where, for use in identifying any contamination that does occur.
    4. Someone who can be sued if all the above fails.

  5. Is Martin Shkreli exploring a new market? by laing · · Score: 2

    He has been known to do this.

  6. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by sit1963nz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is :
    - ensuring everything is done in a sterile environment
    - ensuring its purity
    - testing of batches
    - tracing and tracking the whole process
    - precise weighing and packaging
    - ensuring everything is in tamper proof packaging
    - auditing of the whole process

    All the equipment used in the manufacture, testing, packaging and the people involved are also traced and certified, with everything going back to calibrated National Standards and tested annually (or more). The temperature, humidity, raw materials, etc etc etc etc etc are all tracked right through the whole system in triplicate.

    This is not a "throw a teaspoon full in" and it will be all OK.
    Ingesting something (and we all swallow a low of bugs, insects, dirt, etc every year) is totally different to having it injected into the blood stream,

  7. Re:So why is it hard to make? by guruevi · · Score: 2

    FDA approval and the guarantee that it is pure. Hospitals pay for that stuff even though there is no reason that an average lab couldn't produce similar qualities, the brand name of the product would probably have to go through FDA approval which can take years.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  8. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative

    You say "purity and packaging" as if it's no big deal. It's a very big deal for something you're going to inject into someone's bloodstream. Take some common fungal spores which might not even count as contamination in food, inject them into patients and you could be facing horrific medical consequences on a massive scale.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  9. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's restate "purity" in terms that someone at your level will understand. It has less shit in it that shouldn't be there. Kind of important when you're using it in medical procedures, not so important in industrial procedures.

    It's a perfectly simple concept to understand so I'm not sure why you're having so much trouble. If the stuff available from Wacko's Online Emporium was as pure as what's required for medical procedures, there wouldn't be A FUCKING SHORTAGE.

  10. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    The solvay process doesn't have the impurities that the mined sodium bicarb has. The ammonium bicarbonate is removed from the resulting precipitate by heating it; all the other products of the reaction except the solid sodium bicarbonate are gases. As long as the raw ingredients (dry ice, brine, and ammonia solution in water) are not contaminated, what you'll get won't be either.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  11. Re:Just in Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Critical systems should have redundancy built in.

    That isn't the same thing as inefficiency.

  12. Disputing the Free Market by tjstork · · Score: 2

    The whole problem that neither the free market or the socialized system completely solves is the basic reality is that people don't want to work and shucks, no one really wants to compete, either.

    Competition is a lot of work and the simplest way to make money is to try and be in a business that can avoid it. The easiest way to do that is to churn out intellectual property and rely on the regulated monopoly to attract investment in that property. In systems where there is no intellectual property, then, the next best way to avoid competition is through scale. In fact, big companies make use of both today - they invest capital enough to differentiate themselves, and then they sit on it as long as they can. If a company wins completely in the marketplace, the smartest move is to raise prices. If you have a nimbler competitor, he or she might just instead simply sell out, because, again, most people don't want to work.

    In socialized systems, there's never a part where you get to get rich and sell out, and then not work, so the easiest way to avoid work is to simply do as little as one can get away with. Since everyone is doing as little as one can get away with, smart people with no opportunity for advancement figure out exactly what is just enough to move them ahead commensurate to what the risk is, and social stagnation ensues. But pretty much, the end game of either a free market sector that is mature versus one that is run by the government, is a bunch of people sitting on top of a monopoly sufficient to last their lives, they hope, so they can get paid and not have to work all that much.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Disputing the Free Market by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Scale is very important here. Pfizer has a big leg up because it has already purchased the necessary equipment to make acceptable drugs that pass inspections and testing, even in the case of something simple like sodium bicarbonate. If you want to compete with sodium bicarbonate here as a small provider then the cost outlay to even get started in the market is very high. The profit and margins for such a product is very low at the same time. You basically already have to be a large drug maker just to get started.

      The free market is why fewer and fewer phamaceuticals are making vaccines. Despite the large yearly demand for flu vaccines the profit is low and the companies don't want the hassle. For other vaccines that you use maybe only three times in a lifetime the the market is very tiny and the incentive to make vaccines is very small. Left solely to the free market it is likely to see some forms of vaccines dwindling (we already buy a lot from other countries). There are some vaccines with only a single maker. The free market means that companies are focusing on the most profitable drugs: profits from Lipitor exceed the worldwide profits for all vaccines combined in 2004.

  13. Good thing the FDA is looking out for US by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

    See, without the great and wise FDA's policies of looking out for the people by allowing the concentration of critical supplies and medicines into the hands of 2 such wise and benevolent entities we'd not be in a position where decisions made entirely for profit could affect the lives of the general public. As much as I hate to see people suffer, I almost wish there would be deaths as a result of this and that forced some legal light onto the situation. Critical basics that are free from patent should required to be multiply sourced to ensure a steady interruption free supply chain, not concentrated into one or two 'most' profitable and controllable streams.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  14. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by slew · · Score: 5, Informative

    Purity.

    Not exactly. Both food grade and pharma grade sodium bicarbonate are greater than 99% "pure". Many industrial producers make both food and pharma grade sodium bicarbonate, some of them on the same line and processed to the same purity level...

    The difference is that Pharma grade sodium bicarbonate is specifically tested to assure very small levels of certain specific impurities** mostly to minimize potential issues with inconvenient formation of various precipitates and other complications in equipment (e.g., hemodialysis), or your body.

    All that product testing/certification isn't cheap and is completely unnecessary if you are simply eating it. For example, if 0.05% of the impurity was NaCl or MgCl, that would *bad* in your blood, but if you ate the typical amount of bicarbonate, you wouldn't even notice that impurity.

    **USP has specific tests for impurities such as Chloride (0.015%), Sulfur (0.015%), Aluminium (2ug/g), Arsenic (2ppm), Calcium (0.01%), Magnesium (0.004%), Copper (1ppm). Iron (5ppm), Ammonia (20ppm), Organics (0.01%), etc...

  15. Balance Risks Against Benefits by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    I think we can all agree that the pharmaceutical grade is what hospitals should use. However, if they cannot get it then the potential risks of using a non-pharmaceutical grade product should be compared against not having the treatment which uses it.

    For example, if it is used to treat poisoning and the patient will probably die without baking soda it might be worth the risk of commercial grade baking soda. Similarly, open heart surgery sounds pretty serious and might be something which is potentially very risky to delay so the risks of using a less-pure baking soda may be less than the risk of not doing the procedure which requires it.

  16. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ordinary Walmart product is pure enough for human consumption, as a tooth powder and stomach remedy. My example is chemical reagent purity.

  17. Ridiculous by Mr.CRC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I once worked in the analytical laboratory at J.T. Baker as an analytical chemist. I personally tested NaHCO3 among many other chemicals to USP, FCC, and ACS standards. We had a warehouse with plenty of barrels of these kinds of commodities. Also, I seem to recall that the ordinary box of Arm&Hammer on the supermarket shelf is actually very high quality material, almost pure enough to use for creating primary standard grade sodium carbonate by baking out some water and CO2 at a specific temp.

    Note that the costs to certify to USP grade are little different than for the other grades. It is important to understand that many chemicals which come into a chemical plant never require any further purification. In such cases, a portion is split off to be packaged as ACS, another portion goes in the USP bottles, etc. The remainder can be sold off as "Technical" grade if there isn't enough room to store it. If there is room, it might be preferable to store the raw material that meets the higher specs. rather than sell it all off as tech. grade, because the next load that comes in might not meet the requirements for certs. and thus would need to go through a purification process.

    What's sad about this story is that because of the regulatory/liability state, it is impossible to engage in simple acts of innovation ("winging it") that could solve problems such as this "shortage." E.g.:

    Find a chemical company with some barrels of bicarb. that has been tested to one of the specs., or USP if possible. If they don't have the USP, then have them test the ACS or FCC to the USP std., which would probably pass if it already met one of the other stds.

    Then just procure the damn stuff!

    If additional sterilization is needed, have the truck routed to an accessible sterilization service. Ie., a facility with a gamma ray sterilization unit, where the material could simply be put on a belt and sent through the rays.

    Hospitals should have the capability to filter small lots of solution to further remove any particulates if necessary.

    But no, we'd rather incur large risks of an actual death to a patient to stave off some tiny risk.

    What a pathetic thing we have become.

  18. Seems like by stabiesoft · · Score: 2

    hospitals could allocate the pharmacy grade stuff for the open heart and use the industrial/food graded stuff for things like the bandage itching. Have the patient sign off on it. And as an incentive, charge the patient the buck it costs for the food grade product if they are willing to use it instead of the 100 they'd charge for the pharma grade.But oh, common sense, not in medicine. This is why an aspirin costs 10 bucks a pill at a hospital.

  19. This is the one thing that scares me about Utopia by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Highly optimised systems get increasingly fragile. A highly optimised market for drugs will falter on the slightest off-the-regular imbalance. Same goes for IT services. Imagine everything running on and with Google in 3 decades. And Google then having some kind of hickup that puts the entire society of humanity to a grinding halt for a few days. Or weeks.

    A Utopia would have to be built taking this systemic problem into account. But then again, this might not be the best example. As we all know, the US medical system is about as far away from Utopia as it gets.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  20. Confidentially Agreements by Required+Snark · · Score: 4, Informative
    "the issue was undisclosed due to confidentiality agreements"

    This is the smoking gun, people. The fact that the situation is constrained by secret agreements between players shows that no free market existed.

    The "free market" is a myth, and it has always been a myth. Without some independent mechanism to enforce honest behavior any market will become a criminal extortion enterprise. That is why there are laws against raising prices in emergencies. Otherwise bottled water and cans of food would go up by double digit amounts in case of a hurricane, tornado or earthquake, and people might even die as a result.

    Of course these days it doesn't take a catastrophe for greedy corporations to charge obscene prices. Epi-Pen, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, and Turing Pharmaceuticals have all engaged in extortion pricing after acquiring existing drugs. This is life threatening and gouges the taxpayer as well.

    The history of food and drug regulation in the US is the history of mass poisoning as a result of ignorance, greed and lack of regulation. All the comments about the "ebil gobment" blocking noble free enterprise are right wing masturbatory fantasies.

    The biggest issue we face is regulatory capture where special interests take over the government agencies that are supposed to keep them in check. Examples are the revolving door between the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry or the end of Net Neutrality at the hands of the telecommunication cartel.

    It's not about the government squashing the free market, it's about corrupt powerful monopolies using the government to enforce their dictatorial control over the economy.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:Confidentially Agreements by moeinvt · · Score: 2

      "Without some independent mechanism to enforce honest behavior any market will become a criminal extortion enterprise."

      Government is just a criminal extortion enterprise cloaked in a veil of legitimacy. Once you look past the bullshit, government operates on the basis of violence. All of their revenue is extorted based on the threat of violence and all their decrees are enforced at gunpoint. If you don't pay your taxes, government will steal your property and/or try to throw you in a cage. If you resist, they will resort to violence or even murder. The left wing fantasy is that big government would be good, if only the "right people" were in charge. A fantasy that is dispelled by all of the historical evidence. In the 20th century alone, governments have murdered tens of millions of people, typically their own citizens. That's not even considering war casualties.

      It's only logical that food, fuel & water prices should go up when there's scarcity. High prices create the incentive for eliminating the scarcity. People who live in hurricane and tornado zones & don't have 2 weeks worth of food, fuel, water & medicine are idiots.

      The ONLY reason pharmaceuticals in the USA are so ridiculously expensive is that your government makes it illegal to import or re-import any prescription drugs. Government agents guard the borders and make sure you don't come back from Europe or Canada with a suitcase full of cheap Epi-Pens. Get government out of the way and the free market will eliminate cross-border price discrepancies.

      If regulatory capture is such a huge problem, then it's just more evidence that government is a fundamentally flawed institution. Yes, monopolies and special interests clearly use government power to control the economy. Big pharma using government to prevent competition is a perfect example. If that power can be so flagrantly abused, why should government possess that power in the first place? Take away the power and you remove the potential for abuse.

    2. Re:Confidentially Agreements by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      The problem is that things would be a lot worse without governments. Government is far from perfect, but it's an improvement over what we'd have without it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  21. Re: Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    Read it again - the few contaminants are easily removed. Most of them go away on their own, since they're gases, not solids, and the only one that isn't is removed by heating and it too becomes a gas. For the quantities needed, it's more than good enough.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  22. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

    The ordinary Walmart product is pure enough for human consumption, as a tooth powder and stomach remedy. My example is chemical reagent purity.

    Yes, but is it pure enough to be injected via an IV? Lots of stuff enters through your mouth, how much of that would kill you if injected? Chemical reagent purity doesn't necessarily meet the same standards as injectable purity.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  23. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by stoatwblr · · Score: 2

    The ordinary walmart product isn't being directly mixed with the content of your bloodstream.

    There are a number of barriers between the digestive tract and your internal liquid systems.

  24. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    I call bullshit on the whole "pharmaceutical grade bicarb is so spesh-ul" argument. If you're in medicine in the UK, guess where you can order this grade, and at what price?

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sodiu...

    Note the big red caution that no supplier will ship this product to the US. Since the bloodstreams of British [patients are going to be the same as US patients, the reason for this is that US pharma is setting us up for another Daraprim.

    If they get away with this one, we might as well fill our bathtubs for when pharma engineers a shortage of water.

  25. Re:Pfizer and Amphastar the only option? by MercTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since hospitals quit having formulating pharmacies and went to outsourcing for common stock items like sterile saline, sterile bicarbonate solution, and sterile distilled water; they have been at the mercy of third party suppliers. Such common items are really a low profit item for suppliers that they don't stockpile such.

    The trend to outsource instead of having employees and equipment to do things in house has been working its way into industry since the 1970s. And a hospital is very much an industrial installation when you get down to daily operation.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT