Slashdot Mirror


Resident Evil Getting Rebooted Into a Six-Film Franchise (variety.com)

Martin Moszkowicz, chairman of the board at Constantin Film, confirmed to Variety at the Cannes Film Festival that the "Resident Evil" movie franchise is getting rebooted into a six-film franchise. From the report: The franchise was set to end with this year's "Resident Evil: The Final Chapter," which grossed $312 million worldwide after its January release, including an eye-popping $160 million in China alone. Sony helped sow the seeds of success by securing a release for "Resident Evil: Afterlife" and "Resident Evil: Extinction" in China. Based on the Capcom video game, the series launched in 2002 with Paul W.S. Anderson directing, and Anderson, Jeremy Bolt, Bernd Eichinger, and Samuel Hadida producing the first of a six-movie series. The "Resident Evil" movie franchise has earned $1.2 billion worldwide to date, making it Europe's most successful independent horror-genre movie franchise in history and the highest-grossing film series to be based on a video game.

202 comments

  1. A Corny but Lovely Series by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Funny

    But without Milla Jovovich I'll have a hard time getting excited.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    1. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      China doesn't care. Li Bingbing was the draw there, and they made more in China than the US. So expect to see more Chinese stars in US movies. Not long before most movies are bilingual...

    2. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Yeah love the Resi films. Delightfully crap.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    3. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I would have seen the last R.E. movie, but they decided to just show it in 3D, just to boost revenues. This has become a common tactic now.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have amblyopia (meaning I have a single dominant eye I see primary vision out of) so I am incapable of seeing stereoscopic 3D effects. Showing a movie exclusively in 3D is a great way to exclude me from buying a ticket.

    5. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Not long before most movies are bilingual...

      What....Mexican and Chinese....????

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      I have two normal eyes and can see that 3D effects look like shit. Showing a movie exclusively in 3D is a great way to exclude me from buying a ticket.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or you won't have a hard time at all!

      See what I did there?

    8. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I have to agree there. I remember the first time seeing such an effect - many years ago at the Terminator attraction in Universal Studios.

      For a brief "ride", it's a neat trick, but I have no desire to see a whole film using that effect - and certainly not all the action movies that ever come out. After Avatar (the first full movie I saw in 3D) the only one I've intentionally watched in 3D afterwards has been The Force Awakens - and that was ONLY after first seeing it in normal mode. I wanted to make sure I experienced it both ways but still considered the standard format the "real" film that I wanted to see first.

      Honestly after 2 chances I doubt I'll ever bother with a 3D movie again.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    9. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I made a pair of 2d glasses (well two pairs, out of 2 pairs of 3d glasses).

      It's made it much easier to find showings.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    10. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      China doesn't care. Li Bingbing was the draw there, and they made more in China than the US. So expect to see more Chinese stars in US movies. Not long before most movies are bilingual...

      That's funny. I remember hearing people say that that in 1990 too!

    11. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But chinese people love mila

  2. Ah yes, the good old standby... by Notabadguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why bother coming up with movie ideas when you can just keep remaking movies?

    I can't speak for anyone else, but I can't wait for the remastered, re-released rebooted remaster of the anniversary edition with two extra deleted scenes Guardians of the Galaxy 14.

    1. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. Hollywood is in its downward spiral to bottom, milking the dead cow as long as it lasts. Streaming TV services are replacing the Hollywood crap in a few years. Why go to see a movie in a theater full of teenagers with their mobile phones beeping when you can get a month of HBO subscription with less money?

    2. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Which is why I stopped watching Spiderman.

      At some point, you need something new or the audience won't care to watch it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Maritz · · Score: 2

      At some point, you need something new or the audience won't care to watch it.

      I like to think that this is true, but it just doesn't seem to be.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    4. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The last spiderman reboot died immediately.

      Hope springs eternal

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by geekmux · · Score: 2

      The last spiderman reboot died immediately.

      Hope springs eternal

      Doubt it. The last film still grossed over $700 million worldwide, despite mixed reviews and shitty ratings.

      They'll find a way to regurgitate another one. They've got half a century of comic book stories to throw up on the big screen.

    6. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Why bother coming up with movie ideas when you can just keep remaking movies?

      I can't speak for anyone else, but I can't wait for the remastered, re-released rebooted remaster of the anniversary edition with two extra deleted scenes Guardians of the Galaxy 14.

      Yeah, I'm getting tired of these 'reboots' too. They're re-booting Resident Evil, they've fucked up the fantastic four reboot, we're now in the third Spiderman reboot, and Batman has been rebooted so often the reset button has worn out and they are shorting the contacts with a screwdriver, ... the list goes on. I'll give Guardians of the Galaxy credit for being new and surprisingly good, same for Deadpool but I'm sure they will wear them out too by rebooting them endlessly half way through the series because some director went off to pout, a lead actor decided to concentrate on more artistic projects or the bean counters decided they knew better how to make a movie than the pouty ego inflated artists do which seems to be the secret formula behind most Hollywood flops.

    7. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by righteousness · · Score: 1

      Do you realise that the Deadpool film was a reboot of the Deadpool in the X-Men Origins: Wolverine film?

      --
      Don't fornicate. Seriously, just don't do it.
    8. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A Deadpool who doesn't talks isn't Deadpool at all.

    9. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus neither of the examples were really new as they were adaptations from comic books.

    10. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it was not. The X-men films are not part of the MCU and is done by a whole different company. So two complely different universes so to soeak.

    11. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At some point, you need something new or the audience won't care to watch it.

      Given that Fast & Furious 8 is out and it made $1.2 billion so far, at what point do you think the people need something new?

    12. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the Director's Cut of that.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    13. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a reason most movies are targeted at teenagers. They're old enough to have money to spend on movies, but naive enough to not know that the movie they're going to see has already been remade 50 times before. They figure it out by the time they're in their 20s, but by then there's a new crop of teenagers to replace them.

    14. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will stand by everything said here except the ego inflated artists. Vfx artist put in 16 hr days, no vacation, sometimes waiting for pay, don't get paid enough to save and on contract so no job security plus its over in 6-15 months just to pack up and move to repeat the whole process. I've known vfx workers who have left the industry because the stress killed the artist inside, have families that cant move every year or just got tired of scraping by.

      The egos are reserved for the actors, producers and business men that are driven by greed, not the artists.

    15. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deadpool was set in the X-Men universe. Fox produced the movie because they have the rights to the X-Men universe, as well as Deadpool himself.

    16. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how the system works now. Only major hits are cost-effective for studios because of the immense costs in marketing, so they choose "safe" bets. It is a side-effect of the increase in quality and output from cable and web channels.

    17. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and hten the prequel of the prequel of the prequel of star trek non-discovery

    18. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering how all of this is supposed to go into a downward spiral to end up with the movie "Ass"...

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    19. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast and Furious 9 - 4/19/2019
      Fast and Furious 10 - 4/2/2021

    20. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With different universes the AC meant the MCU vs the Fox-"universe".

    21. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Why bother coming up with movie ideas when you can just keep remaking movies?

      That's what the music industry said about 15-20 years ago. We'll manufacture music, and they'll keep coming... except "they" didn't, and revenues fell. When your drop the pretty lip-syncer of the day into a song started becoming obvious to more people, those people stopped listening to the same rehash. Movies Will have the same issue. Some movies just cannot be remade to be better, different, yes, "better", well, that's subjective, but no.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    22. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      The one glimmer of hope I see here is, if reboots are so common, one of these days they're going to reboot the Transformers series, and then I can watch a Transformers movie not directed by Michael Bay. That means there's a chance (small, I admit) that the plot will actually make sense and I'll finally be able to follow one of the action sequences.

    23. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Which is why I stopped watching Spiderman.

      I stopped watching spiderman because without exception the lead actor always fell short. Or maybe it was the storyline. The frequent reboots also didn't help. I haven't watched any of the last 38 entries in the spiderman series. Just can't raise any interest.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    24. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe but they'll probably just focus on the first few issues of Spider Man and just retell the origin story again.

    25. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Well, the reality people like to see "new" movies. Even though most stuff (though not all) from the 90's onwards is started to hold up pretty well over time, an old film still feels "old". Even if the quality of the filming is good the cars and clothing styles - still start to feel a little dated. Heck technology even starts to show that a film is old (seeing someone pull out an old Nokia or even a Blackberry looks odd these days).

      As such - particularly with many movie-goers being younger, people seem pretty content to watch "their" version of a particular franchise. For the really big stuff I'm sure it'll be profitable for quite a while to just reboot it every 15 years or so.

      And honestly, while I certainly enjoy new content, I don't mind the reboots either. Lord knows I've gone back and watched a movie that I've seen before or even re-read a book (I think I've read "The Martian Chronicles" 4 times now) - seeing a rebooted franchise is just another method to get a new take on a familiar story.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    26. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Will he finally not be in school?

      Seems unlikely.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    27. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The one glimmer of hope I see here is, if reboots are so common, one of these days they're going to reboot the Transformers series, and then I can watch a Transformers movie not directed by Michael Bay. That means there's a chance (small, I admit) that the plot will actually make sense and I'll finally be able to follow one of the action sequences.

      The problem with that is that it may fall upon someone like Uwe Boll or James Nguyen.

    28. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the downward spiral was supposed to end with "Ow My Balls"?

    29. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC's comment still makes no sense. Neither Deadpool, nor any of the X-Men movies, are part of the MCU. To claim that Deadpool is part of the MCU is ignorant at best, and a bald-faced lie at worst.

    30. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Seems to be working for Star Wars / Star Trek.

      They wouldn't be (re)making this stuff if fans weren't throwing money at them for doing it. Ultimately, it's people willing to pay to watch these remakes which causes them to be re-made. If you want new movie ideas, you have to show you're willing to pay for them (and not willing to pay for remakes). The explosion of instant Internet reviews has actually worked against us here, as it's become harder for studios to (partially) recoup the costs of a new movie idea which flops. That makes them less likely to experiment with new movie ideas, and more likely to stick to tried and true ideas - which means a lot more remakes and reboots.

      In a way, it's the same problem I'm seeing with science and R&D. Those have traditionally advanced via the shotgun approach: Lots of people try lots of different things; most miss, but some hit, and the stuff that hits is what allows technology to advance. But managers demanding success from researchers, regulations increasing the cost of trying and failing, and media increasingly and selectively mocking failures, has resulted in technology advancing more via a slower evolutionary approach rather than by leaps and bounds. The inkjet printer was invented by a bunch of guys playing with electrostatic charges to make globs of liquid move, with no thought whatsoever for practical applications.

      You have to be tolerant of failure if you want lots of success. And decreased tolerance of failure leads to decreased success.

    31. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Since when was Star Wars rebooted?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    32. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      No, that's a TV show. "Ass" is a movie.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    33. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      The problem is that studios are making money in a fairly safe method with the reboots and remakes so, to them at least, it doesn't make sense to take a risk on a new and innovative film. Even if I wanted to put my money on a new movie there hasn't been anything from Hollywood that's been worth looking at.

    34. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Each movie in the series has been new and different.

      it hasn't been the same trilogy 2.66 times.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    35. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by lgw · · Score: 1

      That was what the call a "soft reboot". They acknowledge (some of) the previous canon, but then mostly ignore it. Less annoying to the hardcore fans, but still a reboot. Plus they just made the first movie over again, but with worse characters, worse plot, and worse effects, so totally a reboot in form.

      I don't know what Rogue One was supposed to be - spent 2 hours waiting for the good parts. Apparently they filmed some good parts, then cut them out.

      Still, maybe Disney can find someone competent for the next one. It's not a forgone conclusion.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    36. Re: Ah yes, the good old standby... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      don't we have that already or is "America's Funniest videos" no longer on the air?

    37. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Which is why I stopped watching Spiderman.

      The problem with Spiderman and Batman is that the stories are very rich, but the studios insist on repeating the origin story or some variation thereof over and over again.

    38. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And you ruined it by putting 14 on the end. You do realise a different plot with the same characters is still a new movie idea right?

    39. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      No, it didn't.

      The "Avenger's - Civil War" Spiderman is getting a dedicated movie soon.

      Unless you meant the Spiderman reboot before that, and not the reboot before that reboot.

      They should really number these things.

      "Spiderman Universe 3 Movie 2"

      I'm personally staying out of it all until SU4M7E13P2.

      I hear Uncle Ben dies in that one.

    40. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that if they "don't" make a Spiderman movie often enough, the rights will revert to Marvel.

      So every few years they dust it off, release some crap that's guaranteed to pay for the movie and a few years of hookers 'n blow, and shelve it until the best-before date again.

      No real care given to the character, just making sure they don't lose control of him.

    41. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Briareos · · Score: 1

      Uh... the rights already reverted back to Marvel - that's why the upcoming next one might actually not suck for once...

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    42. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that if they "don't" make a Spiderman movie often enough, the rights will revert to Marvel.

      So every few years they dust it off, release some crap that's guaranteed to pay for the movie and a few years of hookers 'n blow, and shelve it until the best-before date again.

      No real care given to the character, just making sure they don't lose control of him.

      I'd swear they made them with hookers n blow, or at least the results are about what you'd expect if they did. Maybe they should allow the rights to revert to Marvel instead of dragging it through the untalented muck of the last 42 versions.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    43. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      Not quite, but close enough.

      http://variety.com/2015/film/n...

      Fox retains the right to reboot it 89 more times, but Marvel gets a turn as well.

    44. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      Er, Sony, not Fox. Whatever, you get the gist.

    45. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like asking if Bart Simpson can grow up finally.

      I don't need Spider-Man to not be in school. I just kinda need Marvel to recognize other characters or at least to tell me a story I haven't seen before.

    46. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      In the comic books they graduate him, and let him live a life.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    47. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Er, Sony, not Fox. Whatever, you get the gist.

      Well, that explains the peculiar lack of creativity in those movies.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    48. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Music died because radios were replaced by MP3 players and there's less exposure to new things now... you have to sell 'more of the same' because people like what's in their personal collection and want more of it. But movies? Kids used to be poor. These days, they have enough money (and they're freer with it) to be a great target demographic.

      As they get older and they get experience they wise up, and then they age out. So what? There's another batch of tweens just itching to watch the latest crap you're churning out A bit older, and you don't have to be that much more inventive to hold on to them a few more years. What you make today can be exploited for nostalgia in 15 years... but in 20 it can be remade because the original audience has been completely replaced and the majority of your new audience won't even know they're consuming rehashed media.

      I still don't get how some properties get 'rebooted' before anyone's forgotten the previous iteration - though in the case of the Hulk I'm glad because they got it so wrong the first time.

  3. Oh come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resident evil has to be the shortest most over extended crappy film series there is. Fuck the film adaptions of the last air bender and the northern lights were better and they have to be amongst the most destructive films with respect to their original medium of all time!

    Fuck hollywood they are shit people.

  4. Anyone still giving a shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Anyone being excited to see yet another movies of a game that butchers both, the game story along with any movie you enjoy?

    Game stories don't really make great movie stories. First, they are too short. You can do a sensibly sized game with a story that fills about 15-30 minutes of a movie. Why? Because the player fills the other hours. And any more than 15-30 minutes of story is going to bore the player who wants an engaging gaming experience first and good cutscenes later.

    A movie is just cutscenes.

    And that also means that they can't just be the little icing on the cake to spice things up, they have to BE the cake. Because there is no interactive part.

    There is also that problem that the whole action scenes are interactive in a game. Which also means that you get away with making them a lot less intricate and choreographed because not only you cannot (since one part of the choreography is the player, who needs to be given pretty free reign to make playing the game interesting), you can simply offload the excitement part onto the player. No such option with movies where people will just passively watch the action. And that better be more exciting than a battle routine where your enemy goes through phases that you have to learn and react to them.

    All that has been tried before. And so far I cannot remember a single time when it was done right. If you want to make a movie, great. If you want to make yet another zombie movie, ok. But please, find something new to write. It's boring to rehash the same old story over and over. We already know how zombies in RE work. There is no way you can make this exciting. The games aren't really getting any more exciting through the story anymore either. The story is written and done.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Game stories don't really make great movie stories. First, they are too short.

      Generally, I would think the opposite is true. Many games have stories that would require a Game of Thrones style multi-season TV series to cover them.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    2. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Like which one?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eagerly awaiting HBO's Backgammon

    4. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Like which one?

      Starcraft -> Broodwars -> WingsOfLiberty ->HeartOfTheSwarm -> LegacyOfTheVoid.

      That probably requires an entire season to make sense, although to be fair the games spanned two decades.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All that has been tried before. And so far I cannot remember a single time when it was done right."

      Postal the movie.

      The best piece of satire in many, many years,

    6. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      If Starship Troopers is any gauge, it isn't even enough plot for one movie.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re: Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in fairness the movies have gone beyond the games. some of the characters are there but i would argue they are more set in the re universe so to speak.

    8. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So, essentially, Falling Down?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      If Starship Troopers is any gauge, it isn't even enough plot for one movie.

      Why would Starship Troopers serve as a gauge? The movie wasn't even based on the book of the same name, you know. They made a different movie and then named it Starship Troopers because they already had the rights and wanted some name recognition.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    10. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      Pretty much any RPG. For a particular example, I believe The Witcher 3 is supposed to have the equivalent of 4-5 novels worth of dialog.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    11. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      It's not. Starcraft is nothing like Starship Troopers, in the sense that Saving Private Ryan is nothing like Hogan's Heroes, in spite of them both being about Americans in the Second World War.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    12. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Starship Troopers movie was a goddamn travesty. It started as an unrelated script, they only bought the rights to the book when they realized the plot was vaguely similar. The director hated the book (he couldn't even read past the second chapter) for being too right-wing and militaristic, so he made it a librul parody. At least the animated series, "Roughnecks: Starship Troopers Chronicles", was closer to the book's tone and added some elements from it that were not used in the movie.

    13. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Starship Troopers is a major disappointment, but it was intended to be Starship Troopers from Heinlein from very early on - I followed its development, it wasnt shot or even pitched as a different film.

    14. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      Starship Troopers is a major disappointment, but it was intended to be Starship Troopers from Heinlein from very early on - I followed its development, it wasnt shot or even pitched as a different film.

      I thought it was originally a different movie called Bug Hunt:

      It originally started out as an unrelated script called Bug Hunt, before the studio acquired the rights to the novel and Verhoeven, disgusted by what little he was able to stomach of Heinlein's book, had the script rewritten to deepen the satire.

      TBH, I didn't follow it very closely but much of the information about this movie says it was originally called bughunt, and that the script was written before they decided to "base" it on the book.The link I gave above is one of many (IIRC, this info was also in a book written by the films producer/scriptwriter/someone).

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    15. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by phayes · · Score: 1

      Verhoeven never made it to (or was incapable of understanding) the books more subtle points, and in particular that people only have the rights that they are willing to defend. Even considering it completely divorced from Heinlein's Starship troopers the movies fails to stand on it's own.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    16. Re: Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but up instead of down.

    17. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he understood the nuances very well, he just disagreed. And then turned those points into satire.

    18. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Witcher series is already based on a group of novels - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Witcher

    19. Re: Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he didn't, because he didn't read it.

    20. Re: Anyone still giving a shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much a given when the whole plot of the game is essentially "evil corp makes virus that makes zombies, then tries to hush it up. In comes big hero and kills all zombies".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Starship Troopers is a major disappointment, but it was intended to be Starship Troopers from Heinlein from very early on - I followed its development, it wasnt shot or even pitched as a different film.

      I prefer Starship Trooper by Yes.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Like which one?

      Civilization II

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yes doesnt get enough credit for being so awesome.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    24. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an older gamer I don't even like cutscenes. In fact I don't play most modern games because there is no game, simply cutscenes. They're awful!

    25. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never played the Resident Evil games, but did watch some of the movies because the women wore short skirts and tube tops.

    26. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Verhoeven the idiot didn't read the book, and so didn't realize it was already satire of a sort - the sort that doesn't wink at you. Which is to bad, as he screwed up the most important point of the book from a story/interest perspective: the troopers were good at what they did. The character arcs, mostly missing in the film, are a bit darker because of this.

      But the script makes a lot more sense as something not based on the book.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    27. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just any RPG, though. Skyrim, being an inch deep and a mile wide, has enough story to fill a leaflet, if you take a direct path from the start to killing Alduin. Any Final Fantasy game would probably have the same amount of story as your average 52 episode anime (about 26 hours of screen time), if not more. It's why Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within was so thoroughly panned by critics and FF fans. Critics thought it tried to cram too much information into too small a package, while fans of FF thought it was way too short a story to be called Final Fantasy. The solution would have been pacing, and, if Square were to do it again, they'd probably do it as a trilogy of 90 minute features, instead of a single movie.

    28. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe The Witcher 3 is supposed to have the equivalent of 4-5 novels worth of dialog.

      Yes, but 95% of it relates to the sex scenes.

    29. Re: Anyone still giving a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apocalypse Now. A colonel goes rogue in the Vietnam war, starts a savage cult with the natives. The military sends a guy to kill the colonel and he does.

      You can summarize almost any plot in a couple sentences. It's the details that matter, and the way the story is told.

      That said, I doubt the Resident Evil games' plots are notably better compared to the movies...

  5. Awesome by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Something new that we've never seen before, again.

    Account's should not have decisions in making movies, erh, franchises.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  6. Paint Dry: The Other Wall by geekmux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The franchise was set to end with this year's "Resident Evil: The Final Chapter," which grossed $312 million worldwide..."

    If sitting in a movie theater watching Paint Dry for two hours drew that kind of revenue, we would see Paint Dry: The Other Wall filming next month. From a financial standpoint, they're never going to fix what's not broken, and clearly this recycling bullshit is what consumers want.

    It's rather sad and weird that new content seems to not be drawing the revenue creators were hoping for.

    1. Re:Paint Dry: The Other Wall by edx93 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Paint Drying II: The Other Wall. Wow! Can't wait! Another glorious 10 hours of watching paint dry!

    2. Re:Paint Dry: The Other Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After lackluster reviews, they decide to spice things up with:
      Paint Drying III: 50 shades of grey

    3. Re:Paint Dry: The Other Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie will feature a painter woefully misusing his paintbrush to the point of destroying its bristles, but paintbrushes everywhere will get excited to go see it.

    4. Re:Paint Dry: The Other Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for Ass: The Movie in 3-D!

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/?ref_=ttqt_qt_tt

    5. Re:Paint Dry: The Other Wall by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Netflix has an hour long movie of an oscillating fan.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    6. Re:Paint Dry: The Other Wall by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I wonder if a better title for this final RE movie would be "Resident Evil: Milla Jovovich Is Getting Too Old For This Shit And Wants To Play With Her Kids".

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:Paint Dry: The Other Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but "The Other Wall" would have a much more diverse cast! And the protagonist would be a strong-female who doesn't need a man to rescue her! Take that Patriarchy!

  7. What is resident evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously: what are you all talking about?

    1. Re:What is resident evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:What is resident evil? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Called "Biohazard" in Japan, it was a game series that was designed as if it were an interactive B-movie with its own terrible acting and cut scenes. Making it into a A-list movie is completely the wrong direction to go with that, but that's what has happened with multiple sequels and now a reboot.

    3. Re:What is resident evil? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it was an a list movie. More of a B+.

      It had decent effects, but was pretty damned campy.

      No super high dollar stars either.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:What is resident evil? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I don't remember it. But if the acting was as bad as in the game, it would at least be memorable.

    5. Re:What is resident evil? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I don't remember it. But if the acting was as bad as in the game, it would at least be memorable.

      The movie was "really-not-very-good" bad rather than "so-bad-its-brilliant" bad.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:What is resident evil? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      It was the first time I saw lasers turn into a grid and cut someone into waffle cubes.

      That was a fun little scene.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:What is resident evil? by lgw · · Score: 1

      The acting was fine, but the writing/dialog was as bad as the game, to make up for it. They're really a fun watch, with reasonable action direction in most of them, and all totally cheesy. The plot doesn't really connect with the games, though - not sure why - but it's equally silly.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  8. Genred Out by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw a headline on some entertainment website, that there are like 150 remakes/reboots in the works at Hollywood, along with a further ~250 sequels. That's not including adaptations of old comics/tv series. I'm just waiting for a reboot of the old film where a train comes toward the viewer, and then cinema can call it a day.
    Even indie films seem to be running out of ideas, all the well-rated ones I've seen recently are pretty similar to what has come before and usually fit neatly into an established genre. Or else they're (seemingly intentionally) incomprehensible. Perhaps the gaps inbetween genres were filled in and no new genres can exist. The 'found footage' subgenre is essentially a retread of the 'mockumentary' subgenre, now that I think of it.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Genred Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's depressing. It certainly seems like there's a dearth of anything new and original in Hollywood. It sucks, but as long as the remakes, reboots and sequels continue to be profitable, they really don't have much incentive to change. A comic book film would have to be really bad(e.g. most recent FF) to not be profitable. Maybe when the movie-goers get fed up with the recycling of old characters & plots, the studios will be compelled to look for new content?

    2. Re:Genred Out by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I saw a headline on some entertainment website, that there are like 150 remakes/reboots in the works at Hollywood, along with a further ~250 sequels.

      That's sad on the remakes/reboots/sequels.

      The 'found footage' subgenre is essentially a retread of the 'mockumentary' subgenre, now that I think of it.

      Found footage isn't a subgenre, it's a "didn't have enough money to pay for actors so I shake the camera enough so you can't focus on the terrible acting" distraction, a la Project Almanac, or likely anything else down recently by Michael Bay.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Genred Out by omnichad · · Score: 1

      reboot of the old film where a train comes toward the viewer

      This was done in a roundabout way with the movie Hugo. And in 3D, too.

      This was actually one of the few movies that used 3D as an actual cinematic element in the same way you would artfully use focus and camera angles. And was actually shot stereoscopically rather than a cheap up-conversion. It was also a tribute to some of the earliest movies lost to time - but a work of art in itself.

      It was also a kids' movie.

    4. Re:Genred Out by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I've seen recently are pretty similar to what has come before and usually fit neatly into an established genre.

      Sure if you define an idea by its genre then you'll find there haven't been new ideas in at least 50 years.

  9. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as far as the movies they have gotten better the first ones where probably b'ish type but still liked them. i grew up with these games loved them from the ps1 era. the movies have gotten a lot better for sure. metalgear solid was a kool game as well and was amazing for a ps1 game really took it to its limits(wouldnt mind a movie of that either though theres probably enough spy/merc/rogue movies of course same with the zombie genre)

  10. Reboots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood: Man. We are running out of ideas. What kind of movie should be made?
    Director: Let's just remake the Resident Evil series and milk it even more.
    Hollywood: $$$$$

  11. Dumb Sequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sequel: Paint Dry: The Second Coat
    Then the jump back to the prequel: Paint Dry: Primer
    No reason to move the location to another wall. That could be interesting.

    Perhaps if movie trailers were actually about the story line instead of just clips of all the action points, more people would go see a movie they haven't seen before.

    1. Re: Dumb Sequels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already wrote a prequel to the prequel. I called it "Paint Dry: The Sanding". Shot it in 3D as well.

  12. Well, the only way is up by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

    I actually really liked the first Resident Evil - movie, the second was ok, but the rest of them I just yawned and rolled my eyes through and now afterwards I just can't recall those movies at all -- it's like I had never even seen them in the first place, which I find quite funny. Now, I have not played the games, I do not have any connection to the lore or anything, so I only watched those movies as exactly that: movies about some mutating viral zombie-thingamabob. Seeing as how exceedingly quickly the movies hit the rock bottom quality-wise I have a hard time imagining any reboots can get any worse; either they'll stay as bad, or get better.

    1. Re:Well, the only way is up by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      That almost exactly sums up my own experience, though I do remember movie #3 a bit.

      I'm hoping to get one or two enjoyable films out of the reboot, before it gets pointless and rehashy.

  13. Resident Evil ~= The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first one was AWESOME, and the following movies just RUINED it.

  14. Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Hollywood used to wait 30 years before recycling old movies for a new audience. Now they can't even wait 90+ days after the last movie to reboot the franchise.

    1. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it didn't.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      You're full of shit again, and not just from ingesting Krispy Kreme through a firehose, you fat fuck.

    2. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      Interesting. I wasn't aware that there was a 1931 version of "The Maltese Falcon." The 1941 remake was obviously a lot more successful of the two.

    3. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there's some large number somewhere that would attempt to represent what you are not aware of. I'd bet you are also not aware of the 1925 Wizard of Oz.
      So much for your "30 year" theory, you sauce-covered morbidly-obese attention-seeker.

    4. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'd bet you are also not aware of the 1925 Wizard of Oz.

      Actually, I have. Oliver Hardy played the Tin Man.

      So much for your "30 year" theory,

      I'm looking forward to the Logan's Run remake, which will be based on the novel and not the 1970's movie..

    5. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd bet you are also not aware of the 1925 Wizard of Oz.

      Actually, I have. Oliver Hardy played the Tin Man."

      You "have" aware? And you still spewed your 30 year theory? Oy vey.

      Watching Logan's Run would be the most exercise you've had in years! Too bad we don't have those laser face surgery booths today, you sure could use one! And you could finally get a woman to talk to you, even if it's just a Dial-A-Hologram!

    6. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Watching Logan's Run would be the most exercise you've had in years!

      In addition to walking 20 minutes on the treadmill, I also pulled 75 reps @ 75 pounds and 15 reps @ 150 pounds on the sit-up rowing machine. Not quite ready to pull 5 reps @ 300 pounds yet.

    7. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, a whole 20 minutes? Not just 10 minutes and you multiplied by two legs? You totally would do that. And 20 minutes... how was your breathing after? Gasping? Wheezing? Coughing?

      " I also pulled 75 reps @ 75 pounds and 15 reps @ 150 pounds on the sit-up rowing machine"

      You sure they didn't nail it to the ceiling so they could cart your immobile body under it?

    8. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Like, a whole 20 minutes?

      That's 20 minutes and 5 minute cool down period.

      And 20 minutes... how was your breathing after?

      Regular.

      You sure they didn't nail it to the ceiling so they could cart your immobile body under it?

      Are you that stupid?

    9. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No it didn't.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      You're full of shit again, and not just from ingesting Krispy Kreme through a firehose, you fat fuck.

      I love the literalism on slashdot. "Ha, you said X, and I found a couple of counter-examples, so you're just a big fat liar!"

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And 20 minutes... how was your breathing after?

      Regular."

      So you didn't actually achieve anything. You could have just walked outside, except that the trail of greasy sweat would terrify children into thinking a giant snail was in the neighborhood.

      "You sure they didn't nail it to the ceiling so they could cart your immobile body under it?

      Are you that stupid?"

      You have to be far on the Aspie spectrum to not see the humor here. No one nailed anything to a ceiling, numbnuts, certainly not for you!

      They'd just roll you on the ground, as usual, and put the machine on top of you, and wait patiently with a resigned look on their faces while you "work out".

    11. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You have to be far on the Aspie spectrum to not see the humor here.

      You missed the part where I'm ROFL as my comments make you stupider and stupider.

    12. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn Creimer what did you do to that poor AC. You are going to have to add him to your foe list. He has a bone to pick with you.

    13. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Damn Creimer what did you do to that poor AC. You are going to have to add him to your foe list. He has a bone to pick with you.

      My boner of contention comes from the half-dozen asshats who jumped on Slashdot at 5PM Pacific and start spiking my comments for the day.

    14. Re:Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it was a ludicrous thing to say, easily disproved. Not only was he wrong on the details, but his "it was better in the olden days" shtick is tired too.

      And have you *seen* creimer? Big and fat surely covers it, and if you read enough of his confabulations the "liar" part just becomes unavoidable.

    15. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's amazing how most people don't post on slashdot during paid work hours. Hey, maybe it's related to why us asshats make more money and get promoted.

      The world according to Creamer: there are only 6 people who don't spend their work hours spamming forums. Thanks for the info dummy.

    16. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] only 6 people [...]

      There are six asshats who do nothing but post shit about my comments starting at 5PM Pacific. I laid down my markers for the day. I'm going to sit back and watch.

    17. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ". I'm going to sit back "

      I feel bad for that chair. There are plenty of posts today from before 5PM Pacific...

    18. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. People successful in their careers spend the day working and post on slashdot after work. What is it you are not understanding here stupid?

    19. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strange. I just got off of work (late as usual) and went through your history. plenty of people shitting all over you during the day as well. are you going to conveniently ignore that?

      also, I'll jump on the wagon: News for Nerds, not news for special-ed college dropouts.

    20. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I just got off of work (late as usual) and went through your history. plenty of people shitting all over you during the day as well. are you going to conveniently ignore that?

      Yes. No one wrote six paragraphs of vitriol that is the hallmark of the half-dozen asshats who shit post overnight. Maybe they're shy after getting push back from other readers.

    21. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "six paragraphs"? In one post? I'm some moron with a day off in Montreal, and I amused myself by insulting you today. That's it. There's no team of 6 people posting after 5PM Pacific.

    22. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright I'll play. Watching Janeway, and gotta do smth else not to get bored.

      In you history, you have long comments dissing you. Sidenote - I fully agree with Most of them - the content you put on this site is unwelcome, and you are not a Nerd. So - sometimes you get the long ones at 2am. Sometimes you get them at 5/6pm, sometimes you don't get them at all. And mixed in with those are a bunch of short ones.

      You know what you have there? A bunch of different people with different schedules who all over the world diss you, and your malfunctioning brain is finding the pattern it wants to see in order to make it think people actually like you. You are wrong, much like the moon-landing conspiracy morons.

      Given all that, maybe this is now one of those posts that in you mind is made by the 5pm "asshats." I'm sure it is.

      ==>PS See subject, I have nothing against you personally. I just find your posts on any technical matter at the level of a kid who thinks he is a "hacker" because he screws PCs from barebones kits and can pop in the driver CD.

    23. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      There's no team of 6 people posting after 5PM Pacific.

      They are six asshats who have been hounding me for the last two weeks.

    24. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It started with a group of kids from UofM in Ann Arbor. A kid pointed out that his summer intership pays almost the same as Creamer after 20 years of work. They also coined the term Heavy Creamer. Creamer then completely ignored the fact that he has been dissed consistently and repeatedly before that, and thinks it's these kids who get drunk and thrash him every night. From the looks of it, they actually only did it a couple of times. Creamer conveniently ignores all the comments that don't fit his "asshat" theory, which are most posts.

      Me - I've dissed him a couple of times in the last couple of weeks. He really does need to switch to reading instead of writing spam and gibberish. I'm in Tel-Aviv, and just getting ready for work. He thinks I'm a drunk Ann-Arbor kid though. He thinks you are one too now. Good luck on your internship.

    25. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Given all that, maybe this is now one of those posts that in you mind is made by the 5pm "asshats." I'm sure it is.

      Uh, no. You're too nice. You lacked the vitriol that makes other readers recoil and then push back. For the most part, this would be a comment I would ignore.

    26. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      the only asshat I've noticed consistently pounding you in your fat ass is me.

      We're off to the races!

    27. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope he takes off the condom right after fucking you so you can't see that it's empty; you didn't even make him cum!

    28. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expensive wine drinker here. About 1 or 2 of those long ones were mine. I have not seen Any negative posts about you, long or short, day or night, receive Any pushback or "recoil" whatever that is from other users. In fact, what I do see is when there is a negative post, there are others jumping on the bandwagon and shitting on you some more. You then ignore points inconvenient for you, and sometimes god knows why provide a bunch of information supporting the negative claims. You are making things up in you big fat head holding your skinny little brain.

      The one I liked from yesterday:
      OP - this site is not for you, it's for Nerds - honors students, mathletes,
      You - citation please
      Everyone and their brother: read the fucking title of the site
      You - ""

      Gonna go pop open a bottle of 97 Opus One just for you and enjoy reading the rest of the "6 people" shitting on you tonight. And a parting thought: Nerds have never been to a special ed class, and do not administer workstations at 47 years old. They moved on to bigger and better things right out of college. Do read that page title.

    29. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Gonna go pop open a bottle of 97 Opus One just for you and enjoy reading the rest of the "6 people" shitting on you tonight.

      You may have been a nerd in school but your posts smell like a dirty old jock strap. Here your are. Beating up on the fat kid from the short bus. What a man! Coward...

    30. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fat kid from the short bus has walked in to the door labeled "chess club" and keeps sitting down at people's boards and playing checkers. The fat kid needs to leave and go play his child games with his own kind or yes - he will keep getting beat up. By the chess team.

      High school nerds become adult Nerds. We acquire tastes for the fine things in life, we travel and see the world, and learn languages and cultures. We get put in charge of large important projects that we are proud of - things that make global visible difference to society. Like making international banking systems talk to each other, or the gig I did for NASA. It wasn't patching their workstations.

      We are still nerds, we are just older adult nerds. You sound like a butthurt teenager in most of your posts, and almost all of your time is spent complaining how everyone is making fun of you. That is not a 47 year old nerd. That's the fat kid who never grew up but did get old and sad. Time to graduate highschool Creamer. Whatever you say in your blog, on here - we don't take you seriously. You are so far detached from our world - things you say or do are just goofy. I literally cannot even imagine what it would be like to live a life like yours.

    31. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you blabbering on about again Creamer? What races? Why don't you go to your races and stop posting your dumb ideas here.

    32. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy names one of the most well-known wines in the world and that to you sounds like a jock strap. While it does taste like an ash tray, the white trash forum is over there. Please move along since you do not possess the knowledge to contribute to intelligent conversation here.

    33. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think he was nice? yoly shit dude, some people must be really fucking mean to you. that was anything but nice - that was fucking brutal. what the fuck did you do to deserve this on slashdot? it's pretty mellow here - we're not 4chan.

    34. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "read the fucking title of the site"
      -Everyone

      "read the fucking title of the site"
      -Everyone's brother

    35. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see Creamer, by 47, a nerd who is successful would know what Opus One is. You are not a kid. You are an old man, a puffy elephant-sized old man who picked the wrong career. You have a shitty life that a product of drunken white trash would be expected to live.

      You have accomplished a lot given where you started, and you should be proud of that. But on this site, you are nothing. We did not start as white trash. We were not put in special ed by mistake or not. Both my mom and dad are PhDs, and that's where I started. Please just leave and stop being slashdot's newest running joke.

    36. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I literally cannot even imagine what it would be like to live a life like yours.

      If I told you everything about my life, you would be running out the door screaming. One person whom I told my life story to didn't even bother to open the screen door.

    37. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The guy names one of the most well-known wines in the world and that to you sounds like a jock strap.

      I'm not a wine drinker and wine drinkers don't impress me.

    38. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You see Creamer, by 47, a nerd who is successful would know what Opus One is.

      Success comes from working hard, living a sober life, and being grateful for what God gave you.

      Both my mom and dad are PhDs, and that's where I started.

      You're the snotty rich kid. That explains a lot.

    39. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Success comes from working hard, living a sober life, and being grateful for what God gave you"

      This is slashdot you white trash retard. Your truckstop preaching belongs at a truckstop. We work smart, drinking is not a problem PhDs have, and don't no one here preach the word of god or mystical unicorns. Go pray your loser working class bullshit on another site.

    40. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no one here gives a flying fuck about your subpar life creamer. you life does not belong on slashdot. this is a site for nerds in case you missed it.

    41. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Go pray your loser working class bullshit on another site.

      I must have struck a nerve. The 1% always get nervous around working-class techs.

    42. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful there "tech." When I get nervous people like you get fired.

      News for Nerds, not special-ed god preaching. Leave.

    43. Re: Final Chapter Syndrome... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      What races?

      Race to the bottom. Do you seriously everyone else likes reading about your schoolyard antics.

  15. Money Grab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 6-part series remake? Are you fucking kidding me?

    1. Re: Money Grab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, they'll reboot again by part 3.

  16. Finally by notsteve · · Score: 1

    Finally.

  17. My only problem was the film editing by WayToGoPhil · · Score: 0

    The stories were okay and Milla Jovovich did a great job but the the sequels were completely ruined by how many cuts they made. Watching The Final Chapter was like watching a series of 5 second clips stitched together. I'm a big fan of what Netflix has done with Daredevil, Luke Cage. The fight scenes, stories, the attention to detail, the subtle use of cuts, the development of the character(s) over time none of which Hollywood is doing anymore. I hope netflix keeps up with what they are doing as I see this as the future of movies.

    1. Re:My only problem was the film editing by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      I've been rewatching Daredevil season 2 and I have to agree with all your points. Jon Bernthal as The Punisher is quite possibly my favorite Marvel character these days. In one episode Punisher goes from being tortured, to kicking everyones ass, to opening up his backstory to Daredevil. Bernthal's ability to go from badass to raging bull to broken man was incredible in that episode. Very well written, and even though The Punisher is by far the most violent, brutal killer in the Marvel TV universe, you still feel for him after that broken man scene.

      Comic books have been telling (sometimes retelling) great stories for decades. At least someone is taking notice and bringing them to life.

    2. Re:My only problem was the film editing by WayToGoPhil · · Score: 0

      Exactly. You've become personally invested in the character. Vincent D'Onofrio did a great job playing Fisk, you begin to understand his motivations and what drives him as a character. As far as reboots go this is one of the best and shows this could be the norm rather than the exception. Personally I would rather see future game/comic adaptations be done in a similar format rather than an over budget, time crunched movie.

  18. Not Deadpool by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Do you realise that the Deadpool film was a reboot of the Deadpool in the X-Men Origins: Wolverine film?

    They might have called the character Deadpool but that wasn't Deadpool. That shared as much with the source material as the iRobot movie shared with the Issac Asimov book or Starship Troopers shared with the Heinlin novel.

    1. Re:Not Deadpool by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'd argue even less than irobot, at least irobot vaguely had to do with the theme of AI and its implications.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Not Deadpool by righteousness · · Score: 1

      Both characters' real name was Wade Wilson and both were played by Ryan Reynolds. How can they not be the same character?

      --
      Don't fornicate. Seriously, just don't do it.
  19. Horror-genre? OK, but nipples played a HUGE, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BULGING part in the success, if you know what mean. Do you know what I mean?

  20. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For fuck's sake, WHY? Hollywood is just getting sad. :/

    1. Re:Why? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I think pathetic is a more appropriate description.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  21. Eh... by circularWaffle · · Score: 1

    I liked the first couple in the series. But, I wish they'd make the movies like the first couple games were...Regular cops/people trying to fight an epidemic that some lab created, fighting through it by scavenging and solving puzzles/riddles. I know that's all video game-esque stuff. But, that's why most of us loved it when Resident Evil first released as a movie, I think. I really hope they produce a new take on the movie with a different story. This drawn out plot has gone, and has been, pretty stale since like the third movie came out. I want a new plot, a different perspective at the least. That's what these damn games were built on! "Play through this perspective, and it's on to the next in the next game". All Hollywood did with the last set of movies was play on our nostalgia...and then did basically nothing new with it over several movies.

    1. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main problem is that the main character for the films is the Director's Wife and she rapidly turned into a Mary Sue character by the midpoint of the 2nd film.

    2. Re:Eh... by circularWaffle · · Score: 1

      If I'm being completely honest, I didn't even know that lol. I'm just looking at the story and thinking, "dude, this is not how the games went." Like, I was expecting them to start with a certain perspective with certain characters, then in other sequels, move on to an entirely different perspective with different characters. But, I do see your point. That does seem like a pretty biased way to create these films.

    3. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but but, showing a female character with flaws and weaknesses is misogyny!

    4. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked all the R.E. movies except the last one.

      The massive Russian submarine base was just an excuse to go on an extended zombie bug hunt. They played up how the Corporation was "conducting repetitive experiments" and there wasn't even enough plot to cover that with a fig leaf. Conduct experiments for what purpose? To prove that the virus infects people and turns them into mutant zombies??

      So R.E. can trash fake London without consequences, trash fake Tokyo without consequences, trash fake NYC without consequences, ...

  22. Re:Horror-genre? OK, but nipples played a HUGE, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BULGING part in the success, if you know what mean. Do you know what I mean?

    If nipples stimulated the revenue stream that much, imagine what an actual set of tits would do.

  23. Re:Get rid of own resident evil by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Eliminate our Resident Evil. Exterminate the Muslim religion.

    That's one way to ensure we don't get more films: start a campaign to associate muslim terrorists with "resident evil".

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  24. Re:Horror-genre? OK, but nipples played a HUGE, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can BUY BIG TITS, but one cannot buy HUGE, BULGING nipples.

  25. Re:Horror-genre? OK, but nipples played a HUGE, by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  26. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i actually do not think friday the 13th part ten made any money

    and ill say it hellraiser 7 killed that movie

    you see a pattern
    look at all the prequels of trek and that last star wars movie being nothing more then a complete rippoff of 1977 a new hope

    everyone wiht creativity left them a long long long time ago and all thats left are lawyers and there hooker wives

  27. New Series Title by sqorbit · · Score: 1

    "Resident Evil - The Fast and Furious Series"

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
  28. 700 million world wide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 billion people on the net

    and you can only make 700 million with all that adverting and spin and such is AWFUL

    lets say avg ticket of 10 bucks
    70 million ...is about 2.3 % of all the people on the net
    and about .93% of the world saw your movie
    and im going to say that most of the cash is form 20 dollar pop n popcorn alongside the 10 dollar ticket

    the reason a lot of theatres are going out of business is the very fact of the above....30-40 bucks per person to see a movie .....no thanks

    cable tv costs min 40-60 bucks upwards of 100 ...no thanks
    i think ill go get laid instead a paying hollywood to see some gay transgendered poor latino whose oppression saves teh world for the 50th time

    1. Re:700 million world wide by geekmux · · Score: 1

      3 billion people on the net

      and you can only make 700 million with all that adverting and spin and such is AWFUL

      lets say avg ticket of 10 bucks 70 million ...is about 2.3 % of all the people on the net and about .93% of the world saw your movie

      Your statistics mean jack shit until you compare and contrast it against the average movie, as well as another Marvel-based movie (hint: the rest of the planet are likely not Marvel comic book fans). At the end of the day, the creators of movies only really care about one thing; PROFIT. If the movie only cost $100 million to make, then I'd say they accomplished their goal.

      ...and im going to say that most of the cash is form 20 dollar pop n popcorn alongside the 10 dollar ticket

      the reason a lot of theatres are going out of business is the very fact of the above....30-40 bucks per person to see a movie .....no thanks

      On opening weekend, I can go Saturday morning before noon and catch a first-run movie for about eight bucks. If I want a snack, I'll hit the grocery store on the way to the theater and buy something for less than two bucks. It's not hard to avoid getting financially raped, and those prices haven't really changed in years. And with revenue still being measured in hundreds of millions, it sure as shit doesn't seem like popcorn makers or movie theaters are going out of business. Clearly people don't mind paying obscene prices for the experience.

  29. For Odin's SAKE Hollywood... by Ferretman · · Score: 1

    ...at least TRY to come up with an original idea! TRY. You can do it!!!

    Ferret

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  30. Just said no to video games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never saw any of the movies. I dont play video games, so movies based on them have less interest than watching paint dry on a golf course. Reboot all you want, wont get a dime from me.

    1. Re:Just said no to video games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why are you posting here?

  31. pls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pls don't.... jesus christ.... The last 5 sucked; and the first one had the "first real vidya gayme movie" going for it..... just let the last terrible RE movie and the entire franchise die; it is a great example of "dilution".

    There hasn't been a good RE since the GCN remakes. The movies are shit. RE is a great example of what happens to franchises when you run wild with them.

  32. Haven't seen any! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's a good thing? :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  33. Is this a joke? by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    This article is a little late for April Fools' day.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  34. President Evil :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quick-read the title as President Evil and thought it would be a TV series about Donald Trump. LOL