Slashdot Mirror


Resident Evil Getting Rebooted Into a Six-Film Franchise (variety.com)

Martin Moszkowicz, chairman of the board at Constantin Film, confirmed to Variety at the Cannes Film Festival that the "Resident Evil" movie franchise is getting rebooted into a six-film franchise. From the report: The franchise was set to end with this year's "Resident Evil: The Final Chapter," which grossed $312 million worldwide after its January release, including an eye-popping $160 million in China alone. Sony helped sow the seeds of success by securing a release for "Resident Evil: Afterlife" and "Resident Evil: Extinction" in China. Based on the Capcom video game, the series launched in 2002 with Paul W.S. Anderson directing, and Anderson, Jeremy Bolt, Bernd Eichinger, and Samuel Hadida producing the first of a six-movie series. The "Resident Evil" movie franchise has earned $1.2 billion worldwide to date, making it Europe's most successful independent horror-genre movie franchise in history and the highest-grossing film series to be based on a video game.

16 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. A Corny but Lovely Series by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Funny

    But without Milla Jovovich I'll have a hard time getting excited.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    1. Re:A Corny but Lovely Series by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      China doesn't care. Li Bingbing was the draw there, and they made more in China than the US. So expect to see more Chinese stars in US movies. Not long before most movies are bilingual...

  2. Ah yes, the good old standby... by Notabadguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why bother coming up with movie ideas when you can just keep remaking movies?

    I can't speak for anyone else, but I can't wait for the remastered, re-released rebooted remaster of the anniversary edition with two extra deleted scenes Guardians of the Galaxy 14.

    1. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Which is why I stopped watching Spiderman.

      At some point, you need something new or the audience won't care to watch it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Maritz · · Score: 2

      At some point, you need something new or the audience won't care to watch it.

      I like to think that this is true, but it just doesn't seem to be.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    3. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by geekmux · · Score: 2

      The last spiderman reboot died immediately.

      Hope springs eternal

      Doubt it. The last film still grossed over $700 million worldwide, despite mixed reviews and shitty ratings.

      They'll find a way to regurgitate another one. They've got half a century of comic book stories to throw up on the big screen.

    4. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A Deadpool who doesn't talks isn't Deadpool at all.

    5. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At some point, you need something new or the audience won't care to watch it.

      Given that Fast & Furious 8 is out and it made $1.2 billion so far, at what point do you think the people need something new?

    6. Re:Ah yes, the good old standby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a reason most movies are targeted at teenagers. They're old enough to have money to spend on movies, but naive enough to not know that the movie they're going to see has already been remade 50 times before. They figure it out by the time they're in their 20s, but by then there's a new crop of teenagers to replace them.

  3. Anyone still giving a shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Anyone being excited to see yet another movies of a game that butchers both, the game story along with any movie you enjoy?

    Game stories don't really make great movie stories. First, they are too short. You can do a sensibly sized game with a story that fills about 15-30 minutes of a movie. Why? Because the player fills the other hours. And any more than 15-30 minutes of story is going to bore the player who wants an engaging gaming experience first and good cutscenes later.

    A movie is just cutscenes.

    And that also means that they can't just be the little icing on the cake to spice things up, they have to BE the cake. Because there is no interactive part.

    There is also that problem that the whole action scenes are interactive in a game. Which also means that you get away with making them a lot less intricate and choreographed because not only you cannot (since one part of the choreography is the player, who needs to be given pretty free reign to make playing the game interesting), you can simply offload the excitement part onto the player. No such option with movies where people will just passively watch the action. And that better be more exciting than a battle routine where your enemy goes through phases that you have to learn and react to them.

    All that has been tried before. And so far I cannot remember a single time when it was done right. If you want to make a movie, great. If you want to make yet another zombie movie, ok. But please, find something new to write. It's boring to rehash the same old story over and over. We already know how zombies in RE work. There is no way you can make this exciting. The games aren't really getting any more exciting through the story anymore either. The story is written and done.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      If Starship Troopers is any gauge, it isn't even enough plot for one movie.

      Why would Starship Troopers serve as a gauge? The movie wasn't even based on the book of the same name, you know. They made a different movie and then named it Starship Troopers because they already had the rights and wanted some name recognition.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    2. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      Pretty much any RPG. For a particular example, I believe The Witcher 3 is supposed to have the equivalent of 4-5 novels worth of dialog.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    3. Re:Anyone still giving a shit? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      Starship Troopers is a major disappointment, but it was intended to be Starship Troopers from Heinlein from very early on - I followed its development, it wasnt shot or even pitched as a different film.

      I thought it was originally a different movie called Bug Hunt:

      It originally started out as an unrelated script called Bug Hunt, before the studio acquired the rights to the novel and Verhoeven, disgusted by what little he was able to stomach of Heinlein's book, had the script rewritten to deepen the satire.

      TBH, I didn't follow it very closely but much of the information about this movie says it was originally called bughunt, and that the script was written before they decided to "base" it on the book.The link I gave above is one of many (IIRC, this info was also in a book written by the films producer/scriptwriter/someone).

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  4. Paint Dry: The Other Wall by geekmux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The franchise was set to end with this year's "Resident Evil: The Final Chapter," which grossed $312 million worldwide..."

    If sitting in a movie theater watching Paint Dry for two hours drew that kind of revenue, we would see Paint Dry: The Other Wall filming next month. From a financial standpoint, they're never going to fix what's not broken, and clearly this recycling bullshit is what consumers want.

    It's rather sad and weird that new content seems to not be drawing the revenue creators were hoping for.

  5. Genred Out by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw a headline on some entertainment website, that there are like 150 remakes/reboots in the works at Hollywood, along with a further ~250 sequels. That's not including adaptations of old comics/tv series. I'm just waiting for a reboot of the old film where a train comes toward the viewer, and then cinema can call it a day.
    Even indie films seem to be running out of ideas, all the well-rated ones I've seen recently are pretty similar to what has come before and usually fit neatly into an established genre. Or else they're (seemingly intentionally) incomprehensible. Perhaps the gaps inbetween genres were filled in and no new genres can exist. The 'found footage' subgenre is essentially a retread of the 'mockumentary' subgenre, now that I think of it.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  6. Not Deadpool by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Do you realise that the Deadpool film was a reboot of the Deadpool in the X-Men Origins: Wolverine film?

    They might have called the character Deadpool but that wasn't Deadpool. That shared as much with the source material as the iRobot movie shared with the Issac Asimov book or Starship Troopers shared with the Heinlin novel.