Slashdot Mirror


US Might Ban Laptops On All Flights Into And Out of the Country (reuters.com)

The United States might ban laptops from aircraft cabins on all flights into and out of the country as part of a ramped-up effort to protect against potential security threats, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said on Sunday. From a report:In an interview on "Fox News Sunday," Kelly said the United States planned to "raise the bar" on airline security, including tightening screening of carry-on items. "That's the thing that they are obsessed with, the terrorists, the idea of knocking down an airplane in flight, particularly if it's a U.S. carrier, particularly if it's full of U.S. people." In March, the government imposed restrictions on large electronic devices in aircraft cabins on flights from 10 airports, including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Turkey. Kelly said the move would be part of a broader airline security effort to combat what he called "a real sophisticated threat." He said no decision had been made as to the timing of any ban. "We are still following the intelligence," he said, "and are in the process of defining this, but we're going to raise the bar generally speaking for aviation much higher than it is now."

52 of 498 comments (clear)

  1. Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptops? by mellon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's about the only positive spin I can put on it. If they're worried about laptops with batteries, let me have one without; then I can just rent batteries when I travel, and the airline doesn't have to worry about it. It would be nice if the whole system could be more modular than laptops currently are.

  2. More security theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meanwhile terrorists are using trucks and going to concerts, not targeting planes. Naked flights coming soon.

    1. Re:More security theatre by shilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Terrorists are using trucks, going to concerts, *and* targeting planes. Obviously. This is a separate issue from whether the response is either proportionate or effective.

    2. Re:More security theatre by OpenSourced · · Score: 2

      That. For some reason planes are to be safer than a mother's lap, no matter the direct and indirect cost, the inconvenience and stress generated. But if you are in a metro car, in a concert, in a convention, you are on your own. For all places except airplanes, cost and convenience are a deterrent for more intrusion/security. But not for planes, no. There you have the big line in the sand. We'll protect that 1% of transport (or whatever), and leave the rest to the wolves, but that 1% will be secure, no matter how many anal probes we have to make.

      --
      Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    3. Re:More security theatre by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Taking down an airliner costs about a billion bucks when the final bills are paid. Driving over a few people in the street... doesn't.

    4. Re:More security theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except that you're wrong because the American tourism industry has already taken a divebomb, and is sure to continue even further if you can't take your laptop on a flight.
      https://www.independent.co.uk/...

    5. Re:More security theatre by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      So what if it's theater? It's very effective theater.

      If it's theatre then by definition it's not effective unless by effective you mean "fools people into thinking that travel is safe". Security theatre by definition means that it's pretend security that really doesn't make people safer.

    6. Re:More security theatre by morethanapapercert · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've ridden in commercial planes, trains and buses. two things they all had in common was 1) no nearly enough legroom, and 2) large numbers of people who I not only would not wish to see naked, but would even be willing to pay moderate sums to avoid seeing at all, let alone naked.

      I am Canadian, spent most of my life within easy reach of the border. But ever since 9/1 and all the subsequent security nonsense, I have pretty much boycotted the US. I used to go over at least weekly. Some of the enhanced security at the border, as it applies Canada's aboriginal people, Canadian and British citizens, arguably violates those peoples rights under the Jay Treaty. Since the wording is "that it shall at all times be free to His Majesty's subjects..." I would further suggest that it might be construed to apply to all citizens of Her Majesty's Commonwealth Realms and Territories. (not the original intent, I grant you, but law rests on the actual wording, not intent.)

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  3. Free laptop rental service! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, I now bill my clients for "useless" travel time, no big.

    Also, to avoid laptop damage, I use the free BestBuy/Target/Walmart laptop rental service. They do require a full deposit, but it's a free laptop rental for up to 14 days, usually covers it.

    The trick to traveling to/from third world countries is to have nothing more than clothes or electronics worth more than say $40, otherwise some down on their look third worlder will steal it.

    I have a compute stick, it's all I need, snagged it on ebay for $40. Perfect for thirld world countries. Or even raspi's. They work on third world televisions that have only composite in.

    1. Re:Free laptop rental service! by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reading between the lines, I infer that you're buying a laptop and then returning it. Besides the ethical issues, I've heard that some stores catch on to this and refuse to sell you stuff after a few times.

      What you seem to have mastered that others could learn from is working from a generic system, keeping all your data separate (flash sticks and such).

    2. Re:Free laptop rental service! by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Separation of data is essential, especially in third world countries.

      Yeah, especially in third world countries that have "United" in their name. I heard about ones with "States" or "Kingdom", go figure.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Free laptop rental service! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You say: "I "rent" one. Not my problem"

      It should be MADE your problem. Abusing return privileges at Best Buy, Target, WalMart, or other stores to get a free "rental" (when you never intended to buy anything in the first place) is completely unethical, and offloads the costs of YOUR use into the store and its customers.

      If your intent is to rent, you should go to a store that RENTS laptops and PAY THEM for the temporary use of their equipment. Not sponge off the rest of us!

    4. Re:Free laptop rental service! by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Third world country, so I have no "ethical" qualms.

      The fact that you believe this says volumes about you as a person as well as your "ethics".

    5. Re:Free laptop rental service! by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Buying and returning items has not a thing to do with ethics. Bigger stores offer returns as a competitive advantage because it's good for their bottom line. 'Working' that system is no more unethical than buying items on clearance.

      Congratulations on admitting don't understand what ethics is; that's the first step towards learning. Here's an initial hint: ethics is not about finding loopholes in other peoples' business models and then exploiting them for financial advantage. What you're advocating is not only unethical but fraudulent.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  4. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean laptops with REMOVABLE batteries? That's crazy, that would never work! That has never existed before.

  5. Flying to the US keeps getting funner by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, what the hell are you guys doing to your country?

    1. Re:Flying to the US keeps getting funner by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The more interesting question is, who the hell would want to go to that country anymore?

      Right. Fewer and fewer people. But it is because of Trump. Not because flying there has become a ridiculous jump-the-hoops game that no self respecting person would ever subject himself to if he has any choice.

      Hell, I'd seriously ponder flying to Canada and driving to the US if I ever have to go to any state within 1000 miles of the Canadian border.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Flying to the US keeps getting funner by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We are. And your tourism sector is already lamenting and crying over the lost dollars.

      So I guess SOME are missing us. Or at least our money.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Flying to the US keeps getting funner by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      No, watching people flying to the US is getting funnier. Flying to the US is getting more burdensome.

    4. Re:Flying to the US keeps getting funner by green1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My concern isn't with what the US decides to do to people flying in and out of their country. There's no way I'd subject myself to that anyway.
      My concern is that these horrible policies tend to be adopted by everyone else shortly afterwards. It's why I still can't take my water bottle on any flight despite there having never in the history of aviation ever been a credible threat related to liquids. (though at least I can keep my shoes on...)
      Security theatre started in the US, and spread quickly to pretty much everywhere else. I just don't want to find that my own country is next with these stupid rules.

  6. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I think the whole idea is crazy. If people aren't allowed to carry them on, and they surely don't want to trust them to the baggage throwers, how are they supposed to bring a laptop with them on a business trip? Can people still bring their phones on the flight? How is a phone any different than a computer really? It's just a tiny computer. Can people bring phones, and bluetooth keyboards, and portable USB C monitors? You could basically bring all the components of a laptop on the plane without actually bringing any single item that actually qualifies as a laptop.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  7. Worse Than Security Theater! by HannethCom · · Score: 2

    Does anyone remember why we are supposed to bring our batteries in the cabin? It is because of the risk of them catching fire, or exploding at low pressure, like found in a cargo hold. Especially when they are in devices like laptops.
    I guess the TSA is just too incompetent though as every other place people have tried lining labors with explosives it has failed. Yes, I know the UK started this stupidity!
    Oh well, I guess we'll just have to live with multiple ticking time bombs on every plane. I wonder when the first plane will crash from this idiotic policy?

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  8. Real Test: Other Countries by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Informative

    The real test about whether this is warranted is whether other countries will adopt similar bans. The ban on devices from Middle Eastern countries had a half-hearted and variable adoption in the UK and Canada. I also wonder if this is not a ploy of the terrorists. The IRA (Irish terrorist group not a US retirement account) used to phone up the police with fake bomb warnings for major London train stations to cause widespread disruption without actually having to do anything other than once every few years leaving a real but small explosive device just so the police could never ignore their warnings.

    It seems that the current breed of terrorists might be playing the same game. Talking about a laptop device to bring down a plane when they think it is likely to be picked up simply to cause widespread disruption while sticking to bombing open venues, driving lorries through crowds or whatever similarly evil but security avoiding schemes their warped minds can come up with.

  9. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    Size matters... I mean, that's what I've heard..

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  10. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by mellon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, i don't mean that. I mean laptops with external batteries. Removable batteries means that you can't have a standardized battery, so there's no rental market.

  11. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by mellon · · Score: 2

    Small batteries don't have enough mass to pose a problem.

  12. Re:Not really taking this seriously are they by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

    Or surgically implant it. Last time I flew out of the US, they only used the backscatter body scanner, not a metal detector. It would have been easy to walk through with an implanted bomb.

  13. Re:Ruining it for everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe if it was actual security and not theater we wouldn't have this problem.

    What else are they supposed to do? Any effective effort is blocked by activists.

    The monthly terror attacks in the Western world are being perpetrated by people from the same few countries. Yet any effort to more closely look at who we let into our countries or reducing the amount of people we let in unchecked is being brigaded by a hysterical media and liberals who throw around -isms all day.

  14. Re:Ruining it for everyone... by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes. Blame the judges who refused to let the government take effective action against the people who would make these kind of attacks.

    If you want to let terrorists into your country, you can't really complain when the government starts treating everyone like a terrorist.

  15. No more flights to the US then by johannesg · · Score: 2

    The ban apparently also includes cameras, and I will not (ever) put my camera in my (for all intents and purposes unlocked) hold luggage.

    No matter visiting national parks or interesting cities, and no more doing business in that country.

    Well, I suppose I could fly into Canada and cross the border by car. Or are laptops also forbidden on those borders?

  16. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The intelligence bar for the TSA is not very high. Best to avoid all conversation and try to get through the check without incident.

  17. This isn't about the laptops by ogma · · Score: 2

    This is about inconveniencing people so badly that they'll gladly say "Yes please" when the TSA demand the budget for newer equipment - equipment that would allow laptops back onto the planes. Some equipment manufacturers are about to make a lot of money off the government.

  18. Lithium-ion batteries in cargo hold? by zuki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This below are comments from pilots and their spokespersons:

    Some airline pilots and safety advocates have questioned putting more electronics into checked luggage. In rare circumstances, lithium-ion batteries spark fires, which could go undetected in the cargo hold.

    After reports the U.S. would expand the laptop ban to Europe, the British Airline Pilots’ Association said May 15 that the risk would be greater with electronics in cargo than in the cabin.

    “Given the risk of fire from these devices when they are damaged or they short-circuit, an incident in the cabin would be spotted earlier and this would enable the crew to react quickly before any fire becomes uncontainable,” said Steve Landells, a flight-safety specialist for British pilots. “If these devices are kept in the hold, the risk is that if a fire occurs the results can be catastrophic.”

    Kelly told reporters Friday that the Federal Aviation Administration tracks safety issues while he oversees security, but he’s been told that batteries in electronics should be safe in checked luggage so long as they are turned off and not rattling around loose.


    So now we're having to calculate if the risk of something really bad happening onboard due to an electronic device's battery kept in the cargo hold catching fire is higher than the risk of terrorists having explosives in their laptops.

    1. Re:Lithium-ion batteries in cargo hold? by Xylantiel · · Score: 2

      "so long as they are turned off" is unrealistic. Some people barely even know the difference between suspend and off. And plenty are likely to forget.

  19. For those not in the know by burtosis · · Score: 2

    This has to do with isis manufacturing laptops with an integrated shaped charge so as to easily pass security yet be effective enough to rupture the wall of an aircraft. This has nothing to do with laptop battery fires. Before trump blabbed this to the Russians he met with in the Oval Office right after firing Comey, I'd already guessed this when a similar ban was implemented from middle eastern and European flights.

    1. Re:For those not in the know by ledow · · Score: 2

      If you can make a charge that can get past security and is only the size of a laptop battery, there are an almost infinite number of things you could hide it in. And laptops would probably be the LAST thing to bother with because they are oddly-shaped, have to work, are often separate in scanning, etc.

      At that point, you could just put it in a small statue and carry it in your overhead luggage.

      Again, security through "imaginary" scenarios.

      If someone can get an bomb through security onto a plane disguised as a laptop, the problem is not the laptop. It's the bomb. Because the second you crack-down on laptops, they can make ANYTHING ELSE to disguise that bomb too.

      Try getting better scanning that doesn't let you put bombs through it. If you can't distinguish between explosive and lithium-ion batteries (although flammable, it's hard to take down a plane with one of laptop size), I suggest you employ a proper scientist rather than a "security consultant" who's being paid by the hour.

  20. Re:Ruining it for everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    We (United States) should dial back our involvement (interference, imperialism) in the Middle East.

    Subjugated people fight back. Funny how Middle Eastern terrorists aren't attacking China, Africa, and South America, isn't it? They are attacking the countries that subjugated them, and continue to be a lightening rod in that area of the world.

    It's a cycle, and assholes on both sides keep feeding it - the bombings (jihad and airstrikes), fake news, lying politicians, dehumanization, religious extremist, etc.

    Until we recognize our part in this we will continue to suffer

  21. Re:The solution: the cloud!!! by vlad30 · · Score: 2

    Ain't it obvious? What travellers should do is put everything up in Google Drive/OneDrive/Dropbox, and fly w/o their laptops.

    Thats how google masters know which companies to buy and sell and the government does have to hack your system they force you to use theirs oops I mean Google Drive/OneDrive/Dropbox

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  22. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's easy. Use a Chromebook and pick up a new one when you land. That way, all of your data is available on Google's servers for the US government to look at and decide whether they whether they want to let you into the country, before you even board the plane.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  23. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by houghi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The thing is that it does not solve the real issue. The problem is NOT the PCs. The thing is the security theater and people being ok with it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  24. Re:Ruining it for everyone... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Informative

    You claim the Orlando nightclub shooting is an "angry Republican type" and get modded up? That was perpetrated - not surprisingly to anybody paying attention - by a Muslim, like almost all terrorist attacks are. We just had another smaller incident that the looneys are trying to pin on right wingers - turns out it was a Jill Stein supporter.

    Sorry, narrative fail.

  25. Re:The solution: the cloud!!! by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

    Thats how google masters know which companies to buy and sell and the government does have to hack your system they force you to use theirs oops I mean Google Drive/OneDrive/Dropbox

    Surely the implication is that the data was encrypted first. You can (and should!) encrypt your data before putting it up in the cloud.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  26. Re:Not really taking this seriously are they by mspohr · · Score: 2

    You'll never get that elephant on the plane.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  27. Foreign or domestic by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the idea of knocking down an airplane in flight, particularly if it's a U.S. carrier, particularly if it's full of U.S. people

    So what is it about already being in the US, that would make it impossible for a baddie to put a bomb in a laptop and board an internal flight ... on a US carrier ... full of US people?

    Once the individual has gained entry to the country (or done so by being born there), is there any special difficulty with sourcing the materials needed. Or is it just that internal flights from every little two-bit airport has so much better security than ANY of the major hubs in any country you care to mention?

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  28. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by wwphx · · Score: 2

    I did that when I flew to Europe in '15, bought a Chromebook for the trip. But the purpose was weight saving and leaving my MacBook Air at home so I wouldn't risk it being damaged or stolen. All I needed was something for email and transferring photos from SD cards to USB sticks. And I'm quite happy with the Chromebook, I just wish mine had a keyboard light.

    Now, if I ever fly out of the country again, it's going to be to Mexico or Canada, then to my destination. I can read a paperback until I get my devices back.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  29. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by Esteanil · · Score: 3

    It's allowed in checked baggage.
    Apparently the amount of explosive they're worried about laptops containing would only be enough to break the fuselage if held against it. Such a laptop bomb exploding within the cargo section would only damage luggage.

    --
    I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
  30. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by Hadlock · · Score: 3

    In the last 18 months there's been this external USB-C battery renaissance. As long as the seats have ~40w USB-C outlets you should be able to power most-all laptops

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  31. How do they justify this? by dweller_below · · Score: 4, Informative
    If the TSA is going to make a change, they must prove that the overall benefits justify the costs. Remember that time they said they needed porno scanners? It turned out that the porno scanners didn't work. And, TSA upper management made money off the sale of the porno scanners. At this point, we should just assume that any proposed TSA change is simply another "make TSA management rich" scheme. While we wait for the TSA's analysis, lets review a few facts:

    Here are some reference pages on various types of death in the US:

    So, your chance of dying of various things in the US is:

    • - Heart disease & cancer in the US: (about 1 in 7 deaths.) For every terrorism death, there are 35,000 deaths by heart disease and cancer.
    • - Dying in a motor vehicle accident: (about 1 in 100.) For every terrorism death, there are about 2,200 deaths by motor vehicle accidents
    • - Drowning in the US: (about 1 in 1200) For every terrorism death, there are about 200 deaths by drowning.
    • - Being killed by police in the US: (about 1 in 2300) For every terrorism death, there are about 105 deaths by police
    • - Dying in a plane crash: (about 1 in 10,000) For every terrorism death, there are about 25 deaths by plane crashes
    • - Killed by lightning in the US: (about 1 in 160K.) For every terrorism death, there are about 1 and 1/2 deaths by lightning.
    • - US Citizen killed by terrorists from 2005 through 2014: (about 1 in 240K deaths.)

    The TSA failure to find weapons and explosives rate is 95%. IE, they only find 1 out of 20: https://www.theguardian.com/co...

    It looks like you could show a decrease in deaths by shutting down the TSA and spending the money on all kinds of other things. For example, you would probably save thousands of people every year, if you took the TSA's budget and used that money to give a daily carrot to everybody in America.

    Of course, the future of the KID (Karrot Issuance Daily) agency is not all shiny orange. The yearly number of carroticides might even exceed the number of US people killed by terrorists. But, even factoring in the increase of death by carrot, there still would be tremendous net positive benefit.

  32. One deep Rabbit hole by cutefatbird · · Score: 2

    Because we have yet to see any supporting evidence and this idea is being pushed by US intelligence agency's also in charge of data collection, we should wonder if this is really about creating an environment where data is forced to flow over the network and can be intercepted, (perhaps a first step) if we ban laptops surely other devices must follow. Where does this rabbit hole end?

  33. Another odd aspect of these proposed changes by zuki · · Score: 4, Informative

    If they are considering banning laptops on flights out of the US... can someone/anyone please explain how a domestic outbound flight is different from an international one. This argument doesn't even make sense.

    Lest we forget, it bears remembering that the hijacked flights that took down the Twin Towers were domestic ones... why would a terrorist only take his explosives on to an international flight? If they enact this ban, it would have to be on every flight, domestic or international.

  34. Credible threat. by DrYak · · Score: 2

    It's why I still can't take my water bottle on any flight despite there having never in the history of aviation ever been a credible threat related to liquids.

    There *IS* a credible threat related to liquids...
     
    ...a threat to the profits of the businesses selling liquids at a steep price on the other side of the security checks.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  35. Re:Maybe this opens up a market for modular laptop by Excelcia · · Score: 2

    If you think that checking laptops is about aircraft security, then I'm sorry but you are new.

    It doesn't matter what actual reasoning they give for the proposed rule. Taking the batteries out of your laptop will not help. It's not about batteries. It's not about bombs. It's about US authorities having unfettered access to your laptop for the X amount of hours between when you check it and when you collect it. I'd highly recommend people start putting security tape on their laptops when they fly anywhere, not just the US. The kind that can't be removed and put back on without being visually obvious. Whole-disk-encryption is also a great idea, but can only help by denying them access to your data, it can't prevent them from installing malware.

    Things you can do to mitigate an adversary having physical access to your computer:
    - Separate your hard drive from your laptop and take the hard drive as carry on. This will be easier if it's an SSD drive.
    - Use whole-disk-encryption like VeraCrypt. When you get your laptop back, DO NOT boot from the hard drive. Instead boot from a VeraCrypt rescue disk that was previously burned and preferable carried with you in carry on. When you do, ensure you replace the bootloader with one that is from the previously burned disc.
    - If you use Linux and whole-disk-encryption, then make sure you have an image of the unencrypted boot partitions and/or boot loaders. Again, this must be taken with you in carry on.
    - If you cannot do any of the above, at the VERY least take the time to boot into a live CD version of Linux and take a hash of your hard drive. Make sure that none of the filesystems on your drive are mounted when you do this. This will take some time, and you cannot boot your computer normally between the time you take the hash and the time you verify the hash. However, this will tell you if anything has been changed on your hard drive between when you checked it and collected it. It won't tell you what has changed, but it will at least give you a heads up that you can't trust your laptop any more.