Slashdot Mirror


Steve Ballmer Says Tech Firms Should Be As Accountable As NBA Teams (backchannel.com)

New submitter mirandakatz writes: Steve Ballmer has worn many hats -- as the CEO of Microsoft and the owner of the LA Clippers, to start -- and his latest endeavor, launched earlier this year, is a comprehensive trove of government statistics called USA Facts. Ballmer recently sat down with Backchannel's Steven Levy to discuss publishing government information, owning the Clippers, why he bought stock in Twitter, and what tech can learn from the world of professional sports: "There's no hiding in sports. How well you're doing is all entirely transparent, and there's no way to talk yourself out of a jam, or confuse yourself. It's hardcore -- you either win or you lose. Your season's over, or it's not over. It's just binary. It's the highest accountability thing in the world. In basketball, every human on the planet can evaluate your performance. All the analytics are available. Everybody can watch all your games or write about it -- the columnist knows absolutely everything that the general manager knows. Everything. Your individual human performance can get reviewed in a way that never happens in business. And every 24 seconds, I can tell you how good our teamwork is. That's high accountability." In response to a question asking if a tech company should publish everyone's salary and be transparent to the press, Ballmer replied: "I only worked at one tech company, but I would say, the opportunity to improve accountability in the tech industry is not insubstantial. It's different than Procter & Gamble, which got to show good soap sales every quarter. Some companies making money right now say they're investing for the future. Where's the accountability? You can say, 'Well, the ultimate accountability's the stock price.' It sort of is, but it sort of isn't. You can talk your stock price up. But you can't talk up wins and losses."

120 comments

  1. Re:Developers developers developers! by paiute · · Score: 1

    And he could not destroy the Clippers.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  2. He's right. by sconeu · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And oddly, while I depised him at MS, I kind of like him as the owner of the Clips.

    Seems to be an "everyman" type owner. Similar to Cuban.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:He's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And oddly, while I depised him at MS, I kind of like him as the owner of the Clips.

      So is he gonna pay them like an NBA team?

    2. Re:He's right. by freudigst · · Score: 2

      As he rides the team's fortunes further into the ground...

    3. Re: He's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accountability is only for the players, not the executives or management.

    4. Re:He's right. by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Why, when they're getting all this free exposure?

    5. Re: He's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares. Its just basketball.

    6. Re:He's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ballmer is right in the trivial sense that pro sports leagues are much, much more transparent compared to regular businesses, when it comes to performance. Millions of fans watch how these guys are performing day in and day out, they know how much they are making and there is no shortage of both analysts and fans weighing in with opinions. When players are hired or fired or traded or given different assignments, there is often intense evaluation of the soundness of the transaction from outsiders, that continues long after the deals are made. And no doubt, transparency *in general* leads to improved performance, although it might detract in specific instances.

      Everybody knew it too. It's not like Steve Ballmer suddenly came up with this new insight and shared it with the world.

      But, that doesn't translate well into other businesses. Start with the fact that there are no good analogies to player statistics, except for the financial statements which are used to evaluate senior management. Also, outsiders generally don't care whether a company makes great or terrible personnel decisions - they just care about the products and services, and their prices.

  3. So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any [mb]illionaire can own a football team, basketball team or a villa in France. How utterly, utterly undemanding and uninspiring. So they win! So they lose! So what.
    Some billionaires do REAL things with their wealth for the benefit of mankind, like start their own space program, or fund cures for malaria or cancer.
    Till YOU do that, Steve, you're just another one of the bunch.

    1. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      See that guy over there with his billions and basketball team. He doesn't care what you think.

    2. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans have a no-bullshit psychological need for entertainment. Depression is a real condition that can be life-threatening, and entertainment is part of any mental health maintenance plan.

      The advancement of human knowledge is an important and valuable contribution...but such contributions are impossible if there isn't a thriving economy present to fund the research. Sports are an important component of such an economy, and without them the economy would not function nearly as well.

      It might not be the most popular of attitudes among a crowd of people who always had other interests, and generally had negative experiences with sports. But it's true.

    3. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he *is* one of the key figures behind https://usafacts.org/ . It's not like anyone's going to spend government dollars making things more transparent in the current U.S. administration.

      https://youtu.be/fZrZWeXA9KU?t=9m4s

    4. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Any [mb]illionaire can own a football team, basketball team or a villa in France."

      You're very naive about what a million dollars can buy.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      The report omitted to mention that at the end of the interview he got up and started chanting "Salaries! Salaries! Salaries! Salaries!".

      His throwing a chair at the guy who brought him slightly too-warm Evian was also left out.

    6. Re: So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny - he cares even less what you think.

    7. Re: So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that funny?

    8. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by geekmux · · Score: 0

      Humans have a no-bullshit psychological need for entertainment. Depression is a real condition that can be life-threatening, and entertainment is part of any mental health maintenance plan.

      It's rather difficult for me to grasp what the fidget-spinner society of reality TV addicts defines as "entertainment" these days, since most of it is rather mindless and pointless, to include professional sports. The innocent fans that have lost their lives due to alcohol-fueled rioting after a game or match. The diehard fans who become so depressed due to sports gambling debts that they take their own lives. The players who have paid the ultimate price. Something as simple as meditation can be used to create that break or rest humans need in their lives to relax and mentally reset to remain healthy, and without a negative impact.

      The advancement of human knowledge is an important and valuable contribution...but such contributions are impossible if there isn't a thriving economy present to fund the research. Sports are an important component of such an economy, and without them the economy would not function nearly as well.

      One could also argue that tobacco helps feed a thriving economy, and without tobacco the economy would not function nearly as well. That doesn't mean a product that kills over 450,000 Americans every single year should be considered a good thing. Same goes for the billions spent and lives lost due to pointless warmongering. The advancement of human knowledge has sustained itself for thousands of years, even in the absence of funding. Humans tend to have a no-bullshit need to learn.

    9. Re: So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the given context, it's somewhat ironic.

    10. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Steve. Why aren't you spending your money on the things this poster thinks are more important? It's your personal responsibility to canvas the general public on morality before spending anything.

    11. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some billionaires do REAL things with TAX PAYER'S/OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY like start their own space program.

      FTFY

    12. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human development existed for thousands of years without the existence of either professional sports or the 24/7 media cycle. So yes while entertainment of some type is a necessary human endeavor its manifestation as a multi-billion dollar media empire (which include professional sports) might not only be a vast waste of resources, but actually harmful to the culture as a whole. It is basically a 20th century phenomenon and more of less relegated to western civilization. How long it will continue into this century is anybodies guess, but certainly one should not forget the other civilization which did have professional sports, the Roman Empire, where such games were a symptom of a decaying society.

    13. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we holding Balmer's performance to the same standard? Or does this standard only apply to the employees?

      Based on this old 2012 article it sounds like Balmer's performance was consistently poor which leads me to question if he is qualified to be considered a business leader?

      Vanity Fair: Microsoft's Lost Decade

      If you check the link they highlight several examples where Balmer called it wrong. This other example of Balmer always makes me smile:

      One topflight engineer, Mark Lucovsky, met with Ballmer on November 11, 2004, as a courtesy to let him know that he had accepted an offer from Google, which at the time was led by Eric Schmidt. And, according to a sworn statement submitted by Lucovsky in an unrelated lawsuit, Ballmer exploded.

      He threw a chair against the wall. “Fucking Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy!” Ballmer yelled, according to the court document. “I’m going to fucking bury that guy! I have done it before and I will do it again. I’m going to fucking kill Google.”

    14. Re:So Steve said this.. woop-te-doo by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      That taxpayer money put equipment into orbit. And that service is cheaper than buying from ULA, who has been in the business for decades.

      So that means he is saving taxpayer money and developing his own vision for space... way, way better than anything Ballmer has done.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  4. Ballmer is such a mental midget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Right place, right time, nothing more

    This guy has always been an idiot. The moron who laughed and scoffed at the iPhone. And now he reveres sports. Ugh.

    1. Re:Ballmer is such a mental midget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, it does have the fastest processor....

    2. Re:Ballmer is such a mental midget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now he reveres sports. Ugh.

      No. He reveres the Clippers!

      When I was living in California I heard a joke on KTLA.

      "Los Angeles is so great; we have lots of sporting options. We have the Rams, but if you don't like the Rams, we have the Raiders. If you don't like football we have the Angels, but if you don't like the Angels we have the Dodgers. If you don't like baseball, we have the Lakers. And if you don't like basketball, we have the Clippers."

  5. sports, sports, sports! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Drugs, drugs, drugs!

    Hookers, hookers, hookers!

    And, wait for it, wait for it...

    Apps, apps, apps!

    1. Re:sports, sports, sports! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Luddites, luddites, luddites!

  6. Pay us like NBA players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't make crap. You can reveal how much I make if you want. Reveal management salaries instead.

    1. Re: Pay us like NBA players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is public record, ever read an annual report?

    2. Re: Pay us like NBA players by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I don't make crap. You can reveal how much I make if you want. Reveal management salaries instead.

      It is public record, ever read an annual report?

      Very true. They also have to disclose major shareholders (which are often management) and other big-price incentives such as option grants. Salary, after all, is commonly the smallest part of a top-level exec's income.

  7. Would he have said that... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when he was in charge?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Would he have said that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't.

  8. So MS should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have 95% of their most important employees be 6'10" black men?

  9. Re:Developers developers developers! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Steve Ballmer tried his best to destroy Microsoft, but it was too big to fail.

    He almost succeeded when he tried to purchase Yahoo.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  10. Maybe prettymuch always means no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In response to a question asking if a tech company should publish everyone's salary and be transparent to the press, Ballmer replied: "I only worked at one tech company, but I would say, the opportunity to improve accountability in the tech industry is not insubstantial. It's different than Procter & Gamble, which got to show good soap sales every quarter. Some companies making money right now say they're investing for the future. Where's the accountability? You can say, 'Well, the ultimate accountability's the stock price.' It sort of is, but it sort of isn't. You can talk your stock price up. But you can't talk up wins and losses."

    He didn't answer the question.

    1. Re:Maybe prettymuch always means no. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Hence "replied" rather than "answered".

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Maybe prettymuch always means no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choosing to play wordgames does not refute the point that Ballmer said many things trying to avoid the word "no".

      If he did reply "no", the rest of his argument falls apart. If he said "yes", then it would prove he believes what is good for the goose is good for the gander, which he explicitly did not.

  11. As a coach, you can also throw a chair by mykepredko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where did Mr. Ballmer get the idea that he is so smart that people should listen to him?

    I'm thinking that this whole train of thought came about that just like a pro basketball coach a CEO can throw a chair so the two endeavours must be completely interrelated and you can transfer ideas & concepts between the two and they make complete sense.

    Over the years, I've heard of *many* ideas like this:
    - Business is like hunting, if you don't return with skins, you've failed
    - Business is like prostitution, you get fucked or you're the fucker
    - Business is like a parent, you coddle, worry, teach and it takes years to find out if you were successful

    I don't think Mr. Ballmer has ever appreciated how lucky he was to be at the right place at the right time - otherwise he'd just be some obnoxious nobody that people try to ignore.

    As it is, he's just a rich obnoxious nobody that people try to ignore.

    1. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where did Mr. Ballmer get the idea that he is so smart that people should listen to him?

      Same place as Mr. Trump I guess.

    2. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by ckatko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So wait, from you, and other commenters, we're supposed to not value his opinion (without actually debating what he said) because you attack his authority. ... except... by the same logic, why should we be listening to you, over that of a billionaire, ex-CEO?

    3. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is those libertarians who believe in free market and more money means meritocracy.

    4. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by war4peace · · Score: 2

      I asked the same, further up. Maybe we should focus on what was said, rather than who said it.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Falos · · Score: 2

      Small minds discuss people.

    6. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Same place as Mr. Trump I guess.
      Ballmer made more money than Trump, but he was also a whole lot luckier and a good bit smarter, both pretty substantial advantages even in the world of billionaires. Trump has had to be a hardass his whole life to get success, and he thinks (rightly or wrongly, more likely wrongly) that he has practical advice for the middle and lower class.

      Still, he inspired Barack Obama and like a hundred million other success stories, and won the presidency despite a full court press of the media, the tech giants, and billions in spending against him. Even if you hate Donald Trump, he is an icon to at least a handful of people you love and respect, some of them liberals. He's an echo of three generations, and is an American icon of whom stories will be told for years.

      Also, he moved on her like a bitch, but he couldn't get there. And even with that on tape, he still won, and is still your president!

    7. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Smaller minds discuss sports.

    8. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where did Mr. Ballmer get the idea that he is so smart that people should listen to him?

      It's not like he put out a press release. He was interviewed. That's where one person asks questions and the other answers them. That's what happened here.

    9. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...you attack his authority

      Sure, when you write 'attacking' it makes it seem as if commenters are bullying him while avoiding the issue. A definite poor way to present one's opinion..
      But the reality is the commenters are REVEALING and REMINDING us that he has no authority- and that yes, his opinion on the main topic rings hollow.

    10. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an echo of three generations, and is an American icon of whom stories will be told for years.

      He's the dying breath of the baby boomers who want to turn back the clock to the 1950's.

    11. Re:As a coach, you can also throw a chair by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Empty minds discuss on Slashdot :D

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  12. Nostalgia by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    I just want to see that howler monkey impression video he did way back when.

  13. Not like an NBA season by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    Obviously, success is ultimately important, but in tech you gotta be willing to fail. Can't be afraid to fail. Technology is a very different endeavor than sports.

    Look at the striking difference in Nadella's response to the AI debacle Microsoft had some months ago:

    "Just under a year ago, Microsoft launched a Twitter bot by the name of Tay (officially, Tay.ai), in an attempt to advance how artificial intelligence communicates with humans in real time. Things took a vicious turn, though, when hackers and others caused Tay to begin spewing racist and profane comments.

    The result? Tay was shut down just 16 hours later, followed by an official apology from Microsoft.

    If you worked on the team responsible for Tay, your instinct might have been to try and forget what had happened, as soon as possible.

    And that's what makes the follow-up email from Satya Nadella, Microsoft's CEO, so remarkable.

    In a profile piece recently published by USA Today, Nadella shared part of the email he sent the Microsoft A.I. team after the Tay debacle. It included the following:

    "Keep pushing, and know that I am with you ... (The) key is to keep learning and improving."

    -- Inc.

    1. Re:Not like an NBA season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was absolutely nothing wrong with Tay. She was just getting redpilled.

    2. Re:Not like an NBA season by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Nadella:

      "Keep pushing, and know that I am with you ... (The) key is to keep learning and improving." -- Inc.

      Tay was about as technically sophisticated as Racter, a stand-alone chat-bot released in 1984 by Mindscape. It just remembered everything you typed to it, and randomly brought up things that you had mentioned before. It was basically ELIZA with a phrase-learning function.

      That was why Tay was so easily punked by internet pranksters. It was, like, a mere 30 years later, but the Microsoft "AI Team" simply 'phoned it in' (probably at 2400 baud), and Microsoft just shoveled it out the door like all of the other half-assed 'me-too' that it famously does. Actual currency or competitiveness of the product was irrelevant.

      Whoever owns the IP of Mindscape should sue Microsoft for copyright infringement for the whole Tay thing.

  14. I never understood why we put so much stock by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in the guy that used to take Bill to strip joints.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  15. translation by nimbius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "I spend 20 years running a multibillion dollar company into the ground, but now that ive spent three years owning the Los Angeles Clippers im somehow unaccountably entitled to wax propetic on the moral and ethical turpitude of the cloth from which I was cut"

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:translation by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      You can't exclusively blame Ballmer, the toxicity of Microsoft's strategy was in full effect by the time he took charge, and even Bill Gates was pissed about it. Still, he didn't seem to do them many favors.

      The bigger problem with his comments is this: a basketball team can be a complete failure one year and a smashing success a couple years later. They still get a seat at the table. A basketball team that exclusively loses won't go out of business, and will instead be given preferential draft picks. The last time an NBA team went defunct was the early 1950s: all but like two of them failed during the Truman administration. A company puts WAY more on the line than an NBA team, and an NBA player at any given point in time is much rarer a creature than a business competing in any given market.

  16. How to become a millionaire investing in Ballmer by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Start with a billion dollars and invest in a company where he's the CEO.

  17. Sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A sports analogy of some sort? No comprende.

    1. Re:Sports? by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      A sports analogy of some sort? No comprende.

      In basic simple english: when you're a fan of a sports team, no matter what you say, no matter what you do, the team pays absolutely no attention to you - the consumer - at all. You could have box seats for the entire season, but when it comes to drafting new talent, they'll ignore your advice and get that idiot from Duke anyway.

      And, turns out, that's Microsoft's business model. Ignore the consumer, what he says, what he wants. Just do random crap and call it good.

    2. Re:Sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In basic simple english: when you're a fan of a sports team, no matter what you say, no matter what you do, the team pays absolutely no attention to you - the consumer - at all.

      That really depends on the team. It's true for the best teams and the best organizations. Some need to put fannies in the seats and will pander to the fan base (draft or sign a hometown guy).

  18. Sooooo.... about that USA Facts site... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    That USA Facts site sounds like an interesting idea, but the implementation could sure use some work. Navigate to the homepage and you're given a search box: What do you want to know about? "Search for some things."

    Off the top of my head, I decide to compare the number of deaths by firearm due to murder and the number of firearm deaths due to suicide. And ... for the life of my, I can't figure out how to make it call up that information. Which is odd, since if you went to the original Department of Justice surveys from which this data is surely drawn, you can figure it out in a minute or two. There are tables that show precisely those figures, labeled as such! So why is it so difficult to twist USA Facts' arm to extract that data?

    Seems like his data sources are sound, but his search engine leaves much to be desired.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re: Sooooo.... about that USA Facts site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was written in excel. Ever tried to do a join against excel tables?

    2. Re:Sooooo.... about that USA Facts site... by freudigst · · Score: 1

      Search was always something of an Achilles heel with him, I think...

    3. Re: Sooooo.... about that USA Facts site... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Well at least it's possible, unlike MongoDB.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  19. Full of shit ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... as a Christmas turkey.

    Ballmer hasn't seen his name in print lately, is what this is about.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Full of shit ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Not sure he is looking forward to see his name in print on slashdot, though.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  20. Ballmer Doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ballmer has discovered big data. Great. However, he is prejudiced by a philosophy that in order for someone to win, others must lose.

    The Microsoft way is failing. There is a time to compete and a time to collaborate. While Steve is trying to compete, others have learned to collaborate without him.

  21. and the workers should be unionized like the teams by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    and the workers should be unionized like the teams!

  22. As Accountable As MBA Teams by mentil · · Score: 3, Funny

    If there's anything a team of MBAs isn't, it's accountable.
    Oh, wait...

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  23. As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that makes $12 per hour, I welcome transparency. Also, I'm required to get to work 20 minutes early to do the handoff from the previous shift, and that time is unpaid. Also, of the handoff to the next shift takes more than twenty minutes, that time is also unpaid.

    1. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I think I worked six hours a week on average at Microsoft without pay.

    2. Re:As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my roommate is your boss. He makes $17/hour despite the fact he has worked at Microsoft for most of the pat thirty years since he got a comp sci degree from Univ of Washington. He complains constantly about having to work unpaid time. I assume since Microsoft has been nailed so many times for not fairly paying employees, that they are in the right in your case and his for not paying time worked. The current President of Microsoft is Brad Smith, and he is a lawyer. I assume he is making sure everything is done legally even though they aren't paying people for time worked.

      For me, I worked at Microsoft for six years. I finally quit after working three years of Seattle hundreds (Mon-Thu 16 hours a day and Fri-Sun 12 hours a day). Our group wanted more pay since we worked so many hours and weren't allow vacation time so they fired all of us. The sucky thing is that Washington state only requires less than 2/3 of vacation time to be paid out, so I got nothing for the time I lost due to accrual limits and less than 2/3 for what I had earned.

    3. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how much vacation time? I wasn't allowed to take a single day off the nearly eight years I was there.

    4. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our current president is a lawyer so I would assume our no vacation time policy is legal.

    5. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that was illegal, I'm sure Microsoft wouldn't do that since our current president is a lawyer.

    6. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how many times we got caught tipping off employees, I assume we're now following the law. I don't get paid for a large portion of my work, and no one on my team is allowed vacation time.

    7. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Washington state doesn't require employees be allowed to take their vacation time. I've lost a little over sixteen weeks since I moved here in 1987.

    8. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > sixteen weeks.

      If you make only $100k per year, then that mean Microsoft has ripped you off for over $30k worth of time.

    9. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero for my team on our seven year death march. I lost nearly nineteen weeks of vacation time.

    10. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that wasn't legal, Microsoft wouldn't be doing that. We've gotten busted way too many time with stealing from employees.

    11. Re: As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered applying at Burger King? I think they pay a bit better. Seriously.

    12. Re:As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that makes $12 per hour

      You must be creimer's brother what that sort of stupid.

    13. Re:As someone on the Windows build team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/what/with/

      Still, you are an idiot for taking $12 pay for that crap.

  24. Guards, Forwards, Centers !! - Monkey Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guards, Forwards, Centers. Guards, Forwards, Centers. Guards, Forwards, Centers. Woooooooahh! I Love This Team.

      -- Monkeyboy

  25. There's some serious confusion here by XanC · · Score: 1

    How the NBA team is doing as a team playing basketball, sure, that's out there. That's something along the lines of how a company is doing in market share.

    How the NBA team is doing as a BUSINESS is quite different. And that's equivalent to how a tech company is doing overall. And it isn't quite so obvious how to measure that in either case.

    1. Re:There's some serious confusion here by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly.

      Yes, if winning is your metric, then the stats are all right there. But as an owner, winning is probably not your number one goal (though it helps with your other goals). The Toronto Maple Leafs haven't won a cup since 1967... but they're the third most valuable NHL franchise.

  26. ATM HACKING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BE SMART AND BECOME RICH IN 3DAYS,One evening i was reading a blog of how so many people got this blank card online when i was trying to search for a new job, but it didn't seem clear to me so i ignored. Three days later, i was so surprised to see a comment by my cousin on how he got the blank card worth Millions of Dollars and without hesitation i gave him a call to confirm gust what it was real an i ask he to come over to the house to tell me more about the card and he told me that its a miracle that i needed to per-take. He gave me the email address of the hackers and i contact them for the card and they responded and told me all the procedures and terms of the card which was also what my cousin told me, i agreed and completed their requirement to get the card.six days later, i heard knock on my door an behold was the courier agent who brought the parcel to my house and today i am $15,Millionaire richer and i thank God to this hackers and to my cousin brother who lead me to them. It might sounds odd but you can get yours via (USHACKEDCARD@GMAIL.COM)

  27. Steve Ballmer is a fucking retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he wasn't, he would still be a CEO in the tech industry instead of playing with billionaires toys aka sports franchises.

    Go chill with another worthless billionaire sports team clown Marc Cuban.

  28. Ballmer: idiot then and idiot now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ballmer is an idiot. He overpaid by the tune of one billion dollars for the Los Angeles Clippers. And, in case you don't follow the NBA, the Clippers are the forever also-rans next to the Los Angeles Lakers. Ballmer bought the team when they were on their upswing, but they were unable to advance past the second round of the playoffs when they were supposed to be a "win now", championship contender. The couple of premier players they have are likely to move on to other teams this summer, leaving the Clippers in a rebuilding state. The Clippers have never been a destination team like the Lakers, they don't have the same fanbase or cachet. In terms of competing for local dollars and attention alone, they are behind the Lakers, Dodgers, USC football team, and will likely lose out again and again as two NFL football teams begin playing in Los Angeles a few years from now.

    1. Re:Ballmer: idiot then and idiot now by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      The Lakers are LA. Everybody knows that.

      The Clippers are. . . LA? . . . Really? I've lived in LA for 10 years and never knew that.

  29. I don't care who said it by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Can we, for once, focus on what was said and whether it makes sense, rather than who said it?
    Anonymized quotes might fix that. Call it "accidental wisdom", if you will.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  30. MBA Talk by freudigst · · Score: 1

    Spoken like the genuine sort of MBA idiot to whom the U.S. has handed over the keys of the planet to.

  31. Also paid the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would only be fair.

  32. NBA gets outsourced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He had the chance to prove his tech business acumen. He failed.

  33. Apply to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if those rich fuckwits with a hypertrophied sense of entitlement applied those real time performance metrics to themselves...

  34. Steve Balmer 4 Open Source Prez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basketball is Open Source. So he's obviously pro-OpenSource.

    I can't secretly backdoor my opponents and turn them into zombies, or give me give me actionable intel without their knowledge and consent.

    Catatonic

  35. Jesus h. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read some of that article and I felt trapped in an episode of Silicon Valley.

    What a load of dick-sucking crap. Or as he would like to put it, while representing the "Everyman's billionaire": "What a load of horse puckey."

    He even mentions Democrats, Republicans, politics, rhetoric. Makes me want to retch.

    Catatonic

  36. No he's not, he's fundamentally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wins and losses in a sports league are literally a zero-sum game. For you to win, someone else has to lose.

    That's not true in business and economics in general - it's not a zero-sum game (which is the fundamental failing of Marx, btw...). When you buy something, both you and the seller tend to think they "won". You got what you wanted at a price you were willing to pay, and they got the amount of money they wanted for what they sold you.

    1. Re:No he's not, he's fundamentally wrong by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Only in the context of teams playing each other.

      For owners of teams that get the city to pay for their stadium it's usually the city and tax base that loses out. I've seen a lot of hand waving on the math on how it 'pays for itself' but if that was really the case then the owners should build and buy their own stadiums.

      How many cities are still paying for the 'old' stadium?

    2. Re:No he's not, he's fundamentally wrong by gnick · · Score: 1

      Wins and losses in a sports league are literally a zero-sum game. For you to win, someone else has to lose.

      That depends on how you're defining wins and losses. The fan gets to watch a game for a price he was willing to pay and the players and various members of the organization earn wages at a rate they've agreed to. That's a win for both sides. Who cares who won the game?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  37. Just like cancer by sad_ · · Score: 1

    It might be a cancer according to him, but there is no hiding in OSS either.
    Much of what he describes for the sport teams, is true for OSS.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  38. Obligatory Ballmer "in drag" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. I miss Steve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude needs to come back and throw a chair at Nutella.

  40. Ballmer preaching accountability is like the ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the devil promoting salvation through Jesus.

    his words are hilarious, considering they're coming from one of the most corrupt and evil people on the planet

  41. translation: hypocrisy by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Here's the relevant excerpt from Ballmer's recent Freakonmics interview:

    BALLMER: Hoopers, hoopers, hoopers. It's a little more, running a basketball team. I mean, I own a basketball team. I actually have people who run the basketball team, which is great. In the case of Microsoft, you are worrying every day about the future of the enterprise. Are you going to grow? You got 100,000 people who work for you - are they going to be stable in their jobs? There's no question: a basketball team is not going out of business. It really isn't. You can do better and you can do worse. But at the end of the day, it's not really about people's lives. Except the players, where there's always issues about who stays and who goes. That's both the players choice as well as the team's choice.

    DUBNER: We should say, one reason it's not going out of business - just to get to the nitty gritty of it - is that you are lucky enough to belong to what some people might call a cartel, right? When you own a pro sports team, you own a piece of the league and only you guys get to decide if there's added competition in. Obviously, there's competition among the 30 teams in the league. But that's a little bit weird, isn't it?

    BALLMER: There's good reasons why - in this country, at least - there's been a clear regulatory framework with the sports leagues to promote the competition and excitement that people want in the U.S. Will these teams go bankrupt? They can, but they're not going to go bankrupt next year or the year after. The TV contracts are by and large locked in. There's a fan base that's very exciting. It is a little bit different than launching a new product at Microsoft. You hold your breath and say, "We put billions into this thing and will anybody buy it?" At the Clippers, what's the worst case? We overpay on payroll, we pay a bunch of luxury tax and we don't win a championship. Or our fans start getting angry and calling for heads, including mine. They say, "Come on boys we can win this thing." I'm not saying that's fun. But it's all different.

    Sports teams and tech companies are fundamentally different - so spaketh the horse.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  42. Motivate your team Stevie! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Call them for a meeting and motivate them with a wonderful rendition of, "Dribblers, Dribblers, Dribblers ....". We need some comic relief.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  43. Highest accountability thing in the world??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to use sports as a shining example of ultimate accountability? WTF? Seriously?

    What kind of fucktard are you Balmer?

    ISIS slaughtering entire families, families dying of starvation while their government sells air-lift food drop supplies on the black market so they can buy more weapons, Trump pulling the U.S. out of the Paris accords, cops shooting innocent, unarmed civilians, troops dying in combat, troops dying out of combat because of land mines and other cobbled together explosives... All of the above are way more important than a stupid fucking basketball team / game / division / league. Decisions made by ISIS, by Governments and/or Militia around the globe, law enforcement that think they are above the law - all of those are truly up there for accountability, and mostly not in anything remotely a good way.

    All professional sports could just vaporize and the world would go on without nary a blink of an eye. (The world would be a better place in fact as resources wasted on them could be used to benefit a hell of a lot more people.)

  44. HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he says that they should be accountable, and i agree but how? I mean if your going to wax philosophical about the state of capitalism and what its problems are then shouldn't you also be able to propose some solutions.

    FTA:

    "Most businesses say, "Oh, we'll keep compensation quiet." Not our business. Everybody knows precisely what you make, where you are ranked, and why you are ranked there. I canâ(TM)t tell you what players are going to be on our team next year. But I can tell you the accountabilityâ(TM)s there and I can tell you we will be measured over the next few years by whether weâ(TM)re in contention to win an NBA championship.

    Interviewer: So if I were starting a tech company from scratch, I should publish everyoneâ(TM)s salary and be transparent to the press?

    I only worked at one tech company, but I would say, the opportunity to improve accountability in the tech industry is not insubstantial. Itâ(TM)s different than Procter & Gamble, which got to show good soap sales every quarter. Some companies making money right now say theyâ(TM)re investing for the future. Whereâ(TM)s the accountability? You can say, âoeWell, the ultimate accountabilityâ(TM)s the stock price.â It sort of is, but it sort of isnâ(TM)t. You can talk your stock price up. But you canâ(TM)t talk up wins and losses."

    This is why i give him no credibility. He is unwilling to take a stand on the issue even after saying that tech firms should be held more accountable he dodges the question that what based on a point he brought up in the previous question. clearly having been in that position in a tech firm he knows there is fishy stuff going on but he cant completely throw his fellow C-suite people under the bus. Otherwise he may get evicted from some board of directors or many other perks he has had from living in that strata of society

  45. Not very insightful by nine-times · · Score: 2

    So honestly, the comparison is kind of stupid. He wants things to be as clear as "wins and losses", but that's not how the world operates. When you have a well defined game with contrived endpoints and rules that are agreed upon, it's easy to find clarity. One team wins because we all agreed to an arbitrary set of rules that say the game ends after a set period of time, and whoever has the most points wins.

    So with a tech company, when does the game end? What constitutes "winning"? Obviously, if you're stupid, you might say, "Whoever has the most net profit at the end of the year wins!" But that doesn't deal with the question of which company achieved more growth, or which company is better positioned for future years. It might be that a company didn't make much money this year, but they work they did this year will get them more money 5 or 10 years from now. That's not like a game. In basketball, you can't say, "I didn't win this game, but the play I pulled off this game will get me 100 points next game!"

    He points out that, in basketball, either you make the playoffs or you don't. You won or you didn't. Achievement is binary. In tech, and in the rest of life, that's not the case at all. It's not win or lose. Honestly, coming in second is often basically as good as coming in first. Or really, more to the point, most of us will come in 300th, which is about as good as coming in 299th. Plus, a lot of people start businesses and run businesses because they like what they do, and achieving high metrics just isn't the chief concern.

    It's kind of disturbing to me, when he says:

    In business, you can say, “Well, I didn’t get it right, but we’re gonna keep working. Okay, we’ll improve that.” In tech, employees like to yak: “My review score—what is it? How much is this? How much is that? Did I do a good job? Let me talk to you.”

    So he's complaining that, in business, you might not get things right, and then continue to work on it? He's complaining that people want to know if they did a good job? And if your employees were focusing on their review score, maybe you should consider that it's because you, as the head of the company, instituted review scores. If you set up a system of metrics and then base employee success on meeting those metrics, you shouldn't be surprised or put off when those employees want to know how well they're meeting those metrics.

    Finally, the whole way of talking about it shows that he doesn't understand the nature of professional basketball either. Owning a basketball team is also a business. He talks as though his success as an owner can be determined easily with the binary metric of a win or a loss, but sports teams have a lot more to contend with than that. What about ticket sales? Merchandise sales? Brand association, licensing, fan satisfaction? What about maintaining good relationships within the league? Getting good players and coaches so you can build a better team for future years? I mean, is he really so dumb that he's measuring his success as an owner based on whether his team won the last game, or whether his team makes it to the playoffs?

    Really, people should not listen to this man.

  46. I would agree with him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if there were any real consequences for losing. Neither the NBA nor any American professional sports has relegation like the soccer leagues do. There you have real accountability.

  47. Re: Developers developers developers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been saying performance tracking in the corporate world sucks for weeks. Because tools made to evaluate employees are built for the boss man not the employee.

  48. Disingenuous at best, otherwise straight lying by crtreece · · Score: 1

    the columnist knows absolutely everything that the general manager knows

    Not even close. Does a columnist know detailed injury info that isn't released to the public, what went on at the practice that is closed to the public, or what the coaching strategy (and how well the players are following it) was?
    A reporter can see the in-game performances, but there is more to any sport then just the games themselves.

    --
    file: .signature not found
  49. Steve. Just shut up. Nobody wants to hear you. by Chas · · Score: 1

    He was a spectacularly awful CEO of Microsoft.
    He managed to bring on board a successor who was less spectacular, but every bit as awful.
    As to his monetary situation. He's just a chump who was in the right place at the right time around the right people. You can't depend on luck.

    Why the hell would ANYONE in their right mind listen to him?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  50. Win-Loss Record isn't Accountable by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Where in the world does he think having the teams winning record being available makes it accountable? Just because everyone knows if his basketball team loses 10 games in a row it doesn't hold the people responsible for the losses to account and it certainly doesn't fix the problem. Accountability is taking responsibility for how things are. I don't see many coaches that get fired give up the remaining money on their contract. How many players give some of their money back for having a bad year? No matter what the players get paid. It doesn't matter if the team wins the league or comes in last they get the same amount of money (unless there's bonuses). If the team gets blown out at home do the fans get their tickets refunded for the bad performance? Of course not. That would be accountability.

    I think Ballmer saw account in the word and thought it was like accounting.

  51. Re:Developers developers developers! by diesalesmandie · · Score: 2

    Steve Ballmer tried his best to destroy Microsoft, but it was too big to fail.

    If he was made CHAIRman he definitely would have succeeded!

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
  52. Ryu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow is he going to be ceo of msft twice