No Known Ransomware Works Against Windows 10 S, Says Microsoft (betanews.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: According to Microsoft, "no Windows 10 customers were known to be compromised by the recent WannaCry (WannaCrypt) global cyberattack." That's great news for anyone running the latest version of the OS, and the software giant says it is working to ensure Windows 10 remains safe from other future attacks. However, if you want to guarantee your safety from ransomware, then Microsoft points out there's an even more secure option to consider -- Windows 10 S. The new, hardened Windows 10 variant only runs apps from the Windows Store, which means it can't run programs from outside Microsoft's ecosystem, and that includes malware. Which is why, as Microsoft says, "No known ransomware works against Windows 10 S."
None of the applications I regularly use are supported on Win10 S, so I guess it's as useless for me as it is for the ransomware developers.....
I believe the correct response to this is "Challenge Accepted".
"They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
Also, no known useful software works on Windows 10 S either. Quite the tradeoff.
Before you scoff at this as random trolling, think about what the odds are that Adobe, Autocad, and any real software packages are going to take a 30% haircut required by the MS store to run on this turkey. Sure MS programs will be there but Steam worn't be, nor will much else useful other than a sub-section of Windows Phone apps.
But no malware as of today will run. They said the same thing about Windows 8.x upon release. And Windows 7, and.....
Because the amount of software that works on Windows 10 S bites syphilitic camel wang.
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
No known ransomware works on a TURD, either.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
No ransomware works on Windows 10S ...because nobody uses it.
READY.
PRINT ""+-0
Known is the key word here. It's not the problems you know about, it's the ones you don't that get you.
If the S version is supposedly better, why offer a $50 "upgrade" to the less secure non-S version? You can't have it both ways. Either you own your walled garden or you accept your open platform. You can't offer an upgrade to a version you're claiming is superior.
Moreover, they're basically arguing that their software is more secure because it's hobbled by design. A rock is similarly secure against WannaCry, but that doesn't mean it's actually useful for everyday computing tasks.
Windows 10S is the ransomware.
Windows 10 S is clearly a push into the education market: but google has has had Chrome For Education for several years now: and the big advantage of Chrome Management Console (CMC) is it being active directory in the cloud done right. CMC makes it super easy to lock down, manage and update education targeted computers (it's also great for digital signage) /.ers have a comparison of the two systems.
I haven't used Azure AD, so it would be interesting if any
Apple had an awesome opportunity here after they created a whole new locked to a store OS niche, but never capitalised on it by giving schools the tools to manage the platform.
Now the only reason PC's are still selling, are office and legacy programs. Think custom business programs written in .NET and specialised CAD/CAM software. MS have lost the first mover advantage to chrome, and I doubt this move will get it back.
46137
you can browse the web right? because it has the edge browser (you know, the most secure browser of the big 3).
sure, edge might run in a container or something similar, and those are secure, right?
better read up on the last pwn2own - https://arstechnica.com/securi...
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
The old wipe-and-Linux won't work if Windows 10 S devices come with Restricted Boot, which means UEFI Secure Boot that a device's owner cannot reconfigure. Microsoft licensed Windows RT only to OEMs who promised to configure all Windows RT devices with Restricted Boot.
Even without Restricted Boot, wipe-and-Linux will fail if manufacturers of components of said devices fail to cooperate with driver developers. You'll likely end up with unaccelerated graphics, no audio, no network, and no suspend.