Slashdot Mirror


'Quit Your Day Job Is Garbage Advice' (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares an article: While Daymond John was building his clothing line FUBU, which would evolve into a $6 billion brand, the entrepreneur was living on the tips he made waiting tables at Red Lobster. "I was working at Red Lobster for five years as a waiter as I was running this business," the Shark Tank star said at the iConic conference in New York City on Wednesday. At first "it was 40 hours at Red Lobster and six hours at FUBU. Then it was 30 hours at Red Lobster and 20 hours at FUBU, because money started to come in." Even after FUBU started to take off, John continued waiting tables. He wouldn't do things any differently if he could, he told the audience on Wednesday: "Don't quit your day job. [...] Let's say I was making an average of $40,000 a year," he continued. "After five years, that's $200,000 of salary. I would have had to sell $1 million more worth of FUBU product to bring home the $200,000, but I didn't have to do that. I just had to sacrifice time."

227 comments

  1. millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    please pay attention to this, as the other (unstated) part matters equally: get a job

    1. Re:millennials? by interkin3tic · · Score: 0, Troll

      Millennials' employment problems aren't "not having a job." They're competing with a more experienced generation that isn't retiring at the age when previous generations did, and they're competing for fewer jobs.

      With smartphones and social media to distract them are you kidding? They'd love to work in auto plants while posting selfies on twitter. Millennials would be the most contented generation ever if they had the same low-skilled, highly paid job opportunities with great benefits, cheap houses, and no student loans boomers had.

    2. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you hiring? No, I didn't think so.

      Nobody else is hiring either.

      "Get A Job" is shit advice.

      Fuck you, boomer.

    3. Re: millennials? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Uh...what? We're currently below the natural rate of unemployment. If you can't get hired in this economy, you're obviously either looking in all the wrong places, or you're just plain inept.

      I'm a millennial, and in my case, I got laid off from my last job a year ago, and I got three job offers within a month of being laid off, all three of which offered much more money than my previous job. Why? Low supply and high demand.

    4. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millennials' employment problems aren't "not having a job." They're competing with a more experienced generation that isn't retiring at the age when previous generations did, and they're competing for fewer jobs.

      With smartphones and social media to distract them are you kidding? They'd love to work in auto plants while posting selfies on twitter. Millennials would be the most contented generation ever if they had the same low-skilled, highly paid job opportunities with great benefits, cheap houses, and no student loans boomers had.

      This is so true. You'd never find entry level jobs now that paid as well as the boomers had it. It's almost as if the boomers are sticking their fingers in their ears, closing their eyes, and screaming "nah nah nah nah" while the next generations are trying to explain how badly they fucked things up for us.

    5. Re:millennials? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am not sure what is with this Millennial hate? Is it only because Generation X was just a boring name. I mean Generation X for a short time was the slacker generation, but that stopped fairly quickly. The Baby Boomers in my book are still the worse. Living off the benefits of winning WWII, where they grew up in housing funded by state government, and with state of the art infrastructure, parents who with the GI Bill had college education. All this stuff allowed them to get drugged up during their late teens and early 20's and still get into Dads business as a professional to pick up his business, learning the ropes and having dad retire at an early age. Then to call yourself a success if you didn't drive the company to the ground, and keeping your job well past the age you should retire, not training the newer generation the ropes. Living in a time period of long term economic growth.
      Now they are retiring, and the kids are trying to fill the void, however Boomers will not let them get a foot hold, cutting their salary so they cannot make a living, and then when they say it is unfair, they will just say you kids don't know about hard work.

      For the most part Millennials are very hard workers, they found a way to survive in a period of economic stress, with a hostile to them work force.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re: millennials? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there are only a few hot spots left in the country where this would be the case for most people. Maybe you were in a position where you could move away from your family, or you happened to be in a hot spot. That's great, but count your blessings instead of calling down everyone.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:millennials? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      They're competing with a more experienced generation that isn't retiring at the age when previous generations did, and they're competing for fewer jobs.

      This is the Lump of Labor Fallacy. Later retirements do not lead to "fewer jobs" . Labor force participation has actually been falling for more than a decade, so if there was really a fixed number of jobs in the economy (there isn't) plenty would be "freed up" for millennials.

    8. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Utah there is huge demand for software developers.

    9. Re: millennials? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If you can't get hired in this economy, you're obviously either looking in all the wrong places

      This is a big part of the problem. People today are less willing to move to find work. Since I graduated from college many decades ago, I have lived in 4 different states, and 3 countries. Today, that happens less often.

      This is partly an unintended consequence of our social safety net. Without that net, people in, say, Flint Michigan, would face a stark choice of either move or starve. So they would pack up, hop on the bus, and go to where the jobs are. But if they get a government check every month that gives them just enough to hold on, they stay on and live miserable lives.

      Instead of helping these people buy groceries, maybe we should be helping them to buy moving boxes and bus tickets.

    10. Re: millennials? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      If there are so few, then please name them.

    11. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The ,main reason people don't/can't move is the actual cost of moving.

      The average cost is about $5,500.

      How many broke motherfuckers you know that have that much in the bank they can just drain so they can pack up and move?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look, it's an xkcd about you.

      "Never stop buying lottery tickets, no matter what anyone tells you. I failed again and again, but I never gave up. I took extra jobs and poured the money into tickets. And here I am, proof that if you put in the time, it pays off!"

      Every inspirational speech by someone successful should have to start with a disclaimer about survivorship bias.

      http://www.xkcd.com/1827/

    13. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, I thought ageism worked mostly in the opposite direction, and older people were being phased out of the workforce in favor of younger, cheaper, people?

    14. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that there are only a few hot spots left in the country where this would be the case for most people. Maybe you were in a position where you could move away from your family, or you happened to be in a hot spot.

      Picking up and moving to where the jobs are is what built this country. I have little pity for those who refuse to do the same.

    15. Re:millennials? by nukenerd · · Score: 0

      You'd never find entry level jobs now that paid as well as the boomers had it. It's almost as if the boomers are sticking their fingers in their ears, closing their eyes, and screaming "nah nah nah nah" while the next generations are trying to explain how badly they fucked things up for us.

      No, it is because the millennials and other post-boomers are happy to buy stuff made in China, India etc bacause it is cheaper, even though it is mostly crap and they complain about Indian and Chinese 5-year-olds being exploited as cheap labour at the same time. 50 years ago in the UK, and I think it was the same in the West generally, people were ashamed to buy foreign made stuff (unless it had to be, like bananas or wine) as they knew it would be putting their own workers out a job, and they knew it was mostly crap too. A guy in my father's circle bought a Japanese camera around then and I remember how scathing the others were.

    16. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average cost is about $5,500.

      Many jobs offer relocation services. I was moved from New York to California all expenses paid by a tech company and I am not a superstar, just willing to try stuff.

    17. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same fantasy land where you found three job offers, you lying troll.

    18. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Francisco, Washington and Texas.

    19. Re: millennials? by chadenright · · Score: 1

      If you know anyone who is actually hiring, I am looking for a job. Point me at em and I'll send them my resume.

    20. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's 257,000 new job openings in the US this month... Most of the boomers had to start at the bottom and work their way up. Do you really believe they started at high salaries?

    21. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Lump-of-labor is a good 96% approximation. Globalist scabs and investors who reject it could smash-faced and/or shot-dead with great benefit to the workers ... there's a war going on pad're. Better start shooting, cause the elites are picking you off.

    22. Re: millennials? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The average cost is about $5,500.

      How many broke motherfuckers you know ...

      Maybe the "broke motherfuckers" could pay less than the average.
      For instance, they could sell their crappy furniture on Craigslist rather than hauling it across the country.

    23. Re: millennials? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's only if you have a lot of crap to move. Get rid of it; that's what Craigslist is for. If you're desperate, you'll sell all your stuff, pack the few essentials and keepsakes into your car, and drive yourself cross-country to the new job.

    24. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      It cost me almost that much to move and all I had were 5 boxes of items.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re: millennials? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, because I live and work in Phoenix, where all of the offers happened.

      What's more, if you look at the BLS figures, out of the 388 major cities in the US, 308 fall at or below the natural rate of unemployment, and should therefore qualify as a so called hot spot.

      https://www.bls.gov/web/metro/...

      Some of these cities are in the 1% range, which means there's a serious labor shortage in those areas, and none of them are the three you mentioned, in fact those three areas don't even make the top 50. And while the average wage in these cities isn't as high as the ones you mentioned, the cost of living is considerably lower, meaning that your purchasing power is very likely higher than those areas.

      Just to give you an idea, Phoenix is roughly comparable to SF in terms of employment, and 100k a year is considered low income in SF, whereas in Phoenix 100k a year basically means that money is not at all an issue for you.

      At any rate, I don't know about you, but I think 308 out of 388 being at or below the natural rate of unemployment isn't very few, rather it's a big majority.

    26. Re:millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They actually tried to drive English cars in the 60s? I bet all the walking kept them in good shape.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    27. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't hire you anyway shitplant

    28. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      So you're saying you're an idiot? We all knew that.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    29. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill yourself. -- slashdot (tm) (r) (c)

    30. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      programmers can find a job in 30 sec tops. Anywhere in the world not just USA.

    31. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labor Force Participation has fallen to 62.7% which is a rate unseen since 1977. It's literally a 40-year low.

      data: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART

      You call that a natural rate of unemployment, I call you a liar. You have your head lodged so far up the safe space inside your own ass, you can't see the people all around you who are unemployed.

    32. Re: millennials? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It cost me almost that much to move and all I had were 5 boxes of items.

      How big were these boxes?

      You can ship a standard 40 foot container, weighing up to 25 tons, from NYC to LA for about $2500.

    33. Re:millennials? by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Walmart (aka China Direct) rose to popularity when millennials were still a decade out. Boomers don't give a crap where something comes from, they just want it as cheap as possible. They don't care if the USA made fan is only $1 more, even if their neighbor worked at the manufacturing plant... they're reaching for the $13 Chinese crap to save a buck.

      -E

    34. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Good thing there isn't demographic bump retiring as we type, 'cause that would make you look like a moron.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    35. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      About a meter cubed each, and I had those shipped while I took a plane.

      Most trucking companies aren't dropping off a 40 ft trailer at your residential area (which likely has a "no vehicles over 2 axles" restriction, which also excludes the largest of U-Haul trucks,) let alone dropping one off at an apartment complex, where a huge chunk of the population resides, as there is simply no room for it.

      Then there was staying at a hotel for several days while waiting on approval to be shown apartments.

      Then there's the food needed to eat during that whole thing.

      And more.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    36. Re: millennials? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 0

      You expect millennials to move further than the couch in their friend's house to find work?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    37. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, you're the idiot. Go read a Marshall Brain book sometime and learn just how stupid you truly are. He even breaks down moving costs in one of them, and that was back in the 90s. Price then? Still roughly $5,000. Those same costs haven't gone the fuck away, you're just choosing to ignore them to make yourself look good.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    38. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      programmers can find a job in 30 sec tops. Anywhere in the world not just USA.

      Liar, liar, lp0 on fire!

      I'm a programmer, and I have a portfolio of open source software, and I haven't found work in years.

      By "programmers" you mean H1Bs, and by "anywhere" you mean India.

    39. Re: millennials? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Yeah. He had five of those boxes.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    40. Re: millennials? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1
      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    41. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is actually hiring, but that doesn't mean the fake job postings ever stop.

    42. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Still trying to flog that stupid book?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    43. Re: millennials? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      You first have to understand what that means, and what unemployment rate means.

      People who are disabled and/or are otherwise on a dole system, people going to college, people who are retired, and people who aren't looking for a job at all don't count towards unemployment.

      For the first part, over the last 30 years, the percent of people claiming disability has gone way up, even though we are now objectively healthier than in the past, we have better medical technology, and employers can't discriminate against disabilities.

      http://apps.npr.org/unfit-for-...

      And if you're paying attention, the boomer generation is reaching retirement age, so you're ending up with many retirees compared to other points in history.

      And then of course, we have the basement dweller population, which is roughly 40% of the young adult population, and is currently at a 75 year high:

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pe...

      Granted, not all of them don't work, but there's little reason to work if you simply don't need to. (*cough* UBI *cough*)

    44. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you care to support your false claim with data? Of course not because the data says you're wrong.

      Labor Force Participation Rate: 55 years and over has been increasing since the 1990s.

      Not only are the demographic bumpers not retiring, women are taking our "jerbs" !

      Women are on the rise.

      Men are losers.

    45. Re: millennials? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Walmart used to pride themselves on selling American made goods. They advertised that heavily and had silly stickers and signs up to proclaim it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    46. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, women didn't really participate in the labor market much before the 1970s, and everyone seemed to get along just fine. Declining labor participation includes a lot of people living for 20 years after retirement, a lot of kids staying in school for an extra 4-6 years, and a lot of people discovering that stay-at-home daddy pays for himself in childcare.

    47. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You'll note that for 65+ that's about a 10% labor force participation rate. Considering the 55+ rate is 30% they are retiring about on schedule. The peak of the baby boom hasn't hit 65 yet. Rate for 55-59 is over 70%. Putting these groups together is a really good example of 'lying with statistics'!

      https://timedotcom.files.wordp...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    48. Re:millennials? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      When millennials try to get their first jobs, they haven't been significant in the economy, so accusing them of favoring stuff made outside the US is pointless. Moreover, greater international trade doesn't really affect employment prospects much, but rather allows people to be more productive.

      The biggest reason there will never again be large numbers of relatively unskilled jobs that pay well is automation. To be paid well, you have to be able to do something significantly better than the alternatives.

      College tuition has gone up far more than inflation since I was young, and less skilled jobs don't pay well if they exist at all. Then boomers accuse millennials of being lazy or improvident.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    49. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, backpedaling scumbag, move those goalposts and change your position on what unemployment means.

      Boomers are not retiring, you dolt. Boomers are stubbornly still working while their adult children can't find work anywhere. Whose basements do you think the basement dwellers are living in?

      Those lazy basement dwellers are just plain inept, dude. They be living on Basic Income or some made up shit that doesn't even exist, straw man like whoa bro!1! All them losers should be more lucky and get jobs like you did. All they have to do is: be lucky!

      You. are. an. asshole.

    50. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The peak of the baby boom hasn't hit 65 yet.

      Nice work admitting, the boomers ain't retiring, yet. You're such a good liar.

    51. Re: millennials? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Oh you're assuming I was talking about the US?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    52. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You're not a very good reader are you? Some of the baby boom has retired and a bunch more are on the verge.

      I repeat: The labor force participation rate for 65+ is about 10%. That's as clear as can be.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    53. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying you're saying you're saying putting sayings in other sayers' mouths? What's up Wumpus, you used to submit better posts.

    54. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Women are forcing men out of the workforce where men are expected to die homeless and destitute in the gutter. Women wonder why misogyny exists in a population of angry displaced men.

    55. Re: millennials? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Good grief, why wouldn't you just FedEx the boxes to your new house and then drive there? That should have easily cost you under $800 even if you were moving from one coast to another.

      Or even better, you could have carried those boxes in your car and spent under $400 for gas.

      What, did you move your stuff by helicopter or something? For the sake of the world, don't ever give out business advice.

    56. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Your white knighting someone who claims $1000/box is a normal move cost?

      For that kind of money, the move crew had better be hot naked strippers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    57. Re:millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want to be hired? No? I didn't think so.

      Don't want to give their week ends or evenings or start at the bottom of the salary ladder?

      Waiting for that plump $20/hr job to land on your lap? Good Luck.

      Get A Job is great advice. Try to keep that job too -and not while texting about not finding the right coffee shop nearby, you entitled shit.

      Fuck you millennial.

    58. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no. I shipped half a garage worth of boxes from Pennsylvania to California back in '08, including some really oddly shaped and heavy shit like a big ass TV.

      Ran me under a grand.

      If he blew nearly $5k on five boxes, he's far beyond doing it wrong.

    59. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading this it's pretty clear that all of your problems are your fault and your fault alone. You need to stop blaming others now because your life is not going to get any better until you realize what the real problem is.

    60. Re: millennials? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      THey have been saying that is coming for 10 years now. Are you sure companies aren't just using technology to downsize and not fill those positions?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    61. Re: millennials? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So? Most people that age aren't doing anything relevant for the company anyway. The ones that are can be replaced by a multitude of inexpensive options compared to hiring a local person.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    62. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      10% labor force participation rate for 65 years and up...suck it liar.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    63. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The claim was made that baby boomers were'nt retiring. I've shown that to be pure bullshit.

      Labor force participation rates were used in an attempt to lie with statistics, while ignoring that lower participation rate populations were growing.

      A group with 70% labor force participation was grouped in with another that has a 10% rate...what bullshit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    64. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of that is true, but the part about Boomers being hippies is for the most part not. It's always been the kids with rich parents who can afford to fool around like that -- they have a built-in safety net.

    65. Re: millennials? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Back around 2000, I moved across the country for about $3k, with a whole (small) house's worth of stuff, plus the cost of gas for driving my car. I have no idea how the hell you got the idea that it ever cost $5k to move a few boxes. You can send boxes by Fedex, you know.

      Check out ABF Freight (upack.com) if you want a relatively inexpensive way to move without having to mess around with a U-Haul.

    66. Re: millennials? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I moved into an apartment once with a trailer; it wasn't 40ft, but it was 26ft. Yes, they do do this; they take up a bunch of parking spaces though. It's not really any worse than someone bringing in a big U-Haul truck though.

    67. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe u are a bad programmer

    68. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      And the 26' one is a two-axle vehicle.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    69. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You have no understanding of how badly you get overcharged when you exceed actual dimensional weight limits.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    70. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Back around 2000, I moved across the country for about $3k, with a whole (small) house's worth of stuff, plus the cost of gas for driving my car."

      Motel? Food? Drink? Other externalities like maps/guides, did you happen to hire someone to pack up the house for you? Guarantee that alone for a true cross-country trip (which I almost did, TN to CA) would've eaten up another $2K.

      I tried everything I could to save, and still got charged out the ass because of heavily exceeding dimensional weight limits (goddamned magnetic ballasts.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    71. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      That you've never read any of them (LOL you think there's just one) just demonstrates your ignorance.

      Well, here, let's throw a few fucking citations out for ya.

      https://www.mymovingreviews.co...

      Now, bear in mind that moving cost is only for a mere 1225 miles. If we're talking cross-country, it goes up much higher. The $4K is an average.

      https://www.google.com/search?...

      $5,600. Again, prices might vary, this is yet another average.

      I'll trust these independently-operating people who can report reliable and fairly consistent numbers over you.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    72. Re: millennials? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who has never held a job in logistics! Well done, sir!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    73. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of bullshit.

      If boomers were so amazingly patriotic, then everything wouldn't have already been made in China in the 90s, by definition before millennials came of age.

      Someone was buying that crap. Most people were buying that crap. That's why it happened.

    74. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can work in both directions. Some employers prefer the older proven worker with lots of experience. A lot of them just want to do their jobs, so no watching for the target on your back, either.

    75. Re: millennials? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Motel? Food? Drink? Other externalities like maps/guides, did you happen to hire someone to pack up the house for you? Guarantee that alone for a true cross-country trip (which I almost did, TN to CA) would've eaten up another $2K.

      I only spent 1 night in a motel, and 1 night at a friend's house along the way. Maps? Are you kidding? Back then, that was a couple dollars at most. I'm sure I already had a US map anyway, and the route was all interstate. No, I didn't hire someone to pack, I'm perfectly capable of that myself. Is that why your costs were so high? You had to hire people to do your work for you? People on a strict budget (which is what we're talking about here, this thread was about people having trouble getting employment needing to move) do not hire other people to pack boxes; that's a luxury. Do it yourself, and maybe get your friends/family to help.

    76. Re: millennials? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. It's not a "vehicle" either. It's a 1-axle semi-trailer. Here's a picture of one.

    77. Re: millennials? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "This is partly an unintended consequence of our social safety net. Without that net, people in, say, Flint Michigan, would face a stark choice of either move or starve"

      Social, yes, safety not so sure.

      Of course migrating because of labor shortage is always a hard stand (while much less so when you are migrating within your own country) but there was a time when labor shortage was a matter of one individual within a family unit so there were no synchronization problems; basically, the husband finds a job everywhere else and there the whole family goes. But now, it's usually two that need to find an agreement for the family to move, so no wonder it becomes more difficult.

    78. Re:millennials? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      For the low end positions yes. For the higher end jobs where they make the big money then it wants the old rich guy.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    79. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're currently below the natural rate of unemployment. If you can't get hired in this economy, you're obviously either looking in all the wrong places, or you're just plain inept.

      Really? It is the fault of the unemployed person if they cannot get a job in an economy where most businesses are realizing "oh shit, we've over-hired"? Because that is the only way your post can read. Saying that there is a "natural rate of unemployment", and saying that we are "below" that rate, implies that there are more jobs than can actually be supported in the economy. In other words, companies have over-hired. Now it's just a matter of time before the job bubble bursts.

    80. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was NOT A programmer by trade, I was a sysadmin. My current job has me doing C programming about 70% of the time. I wasn't even trying to find programming job, it sort of just landed in my lap(I was looking for sysadmin). I don't have a "portfolio" of open source projects. I have one main open source project I work on and have worked on for years. I suspect that one project alone got me hired.

      I'm also not an Indian or an H1B or anything. I'm a goddamn redneck from Appalachia. What's your excuse, other than being a shitty coder who's full of himself?

         

    81. Re: millennials? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You're still claiming $1000/box is, anywhere, a normal move cost?

      I do understand that there are many movers that chump people, but that that makes you a _giant_ chump.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    82. Re: millennials? by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      My experience with the people whose listings make it clear that they'll even give the time of day to non-locals is that if they're expecting you to pay for your own move? Then the you can be pretty certain that pay they're offering is not enough for the area's cost of living, and they can't get any locals to bite.

      It doesn't exactly help that the places that they want me to move to, I'd expect most of that 5K cost that somebody else mentioned to go to obtaining a place to live--deposit and first month's rent, plus whatever assorted fees go to the landlord, plus the various things the utilities will want me to pay for 'hooking me up' when that is now very rarely going to require more than a minute on a computer for them to do. (I'd actually be perfectly fine taking those kinds of wages if the job's close enough for me to live with my parents--but that's because nearly all the entry-level jobs expect you to come with 2+ years of experience, and once I've got those...)

      Things change. One of them, unfortunately, is what you can expect of employers if you're not an experienced, skilled worker.

    83. Re: millennials? by mixed_signal · · Score: 1

      Bus tickets are still pretty cheap...

    84. Re: millennials? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That's right, backpedaling scumbag, move those goalposts and change your position on what unemployment means.

      Ah yes, when you lose an argument, resort to ad-hom.

      Unemployment, as defined by BLS, means people who are seeking work but don't presently work. That is the same definition I've always used, and the same one I've used here, so nothing has changed.

      Those lazy basement dwellers are just plain inept, dude. They be living on Basic Income or some made up shit that doesn't even exist, straw man like whoa bro!1! All them losers should be more lucky and get jobs like you did. All they have to do is: be lucky!

      Aww...did I strike a nerve? Well, from your moms basement, I'm sure you feel very empowered because nobody can touch you without going through your mom first.

    85. Re: millennials? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      An article about a guy working in the US, on a US based article, on a news aggregator website that is US centric...Unless you specify otherwise, (you didn't) then yeah, I'm going to assume that you're talking about the US.

    86. Re: millennials? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I just looked at moving from Indianapolis to New York for a job I ultimately turned down. It was 34% MORE money, but basically a wash with cost of living. There was no way I could move with less then a couple grand that I don't have. Just to get me settled without my family. It would have been around $6k to move with my family, doing it cheap. That might mean living in a long term hotel for afew months because of rental deposits and difficulty finding rentals with 6 kids.

    87. Re: millennials? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Moving costs aren't just physically moving your stuff, which is still going to be around $1500 minimum for a long move. You also have to figure out costs for rental applications, deposits, gas, food, etc... Just the housing costs are going to be $2k+, way more if you have kids.

    88. Re: millennials? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're talking about full-service moving. That's for rich people. If you're too fucking lazy to pack your own boxes, then yeah, it's going to cost you a lot to move, just like it costs a lot to have someone else wash your dog or cut your toenails.

      If you're short on cash, between jobs, etc., you don't use full-service moving companies unless you're a fucking moron. And these companies are great ways of getting your stuff smashed or stolen anyway; they have a long history of holding your belongings hostage and stealing silverware.

    89. Re: millennials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A four-year university degree has become the new high school diploma and treated as the first barrier to employment. Even with a degree and years of experience it is daunting trying to get another job because you must have exactly the product and version of the company to which you are applying. Whatever happened to transferable skills? IT job seekers are worse off after 5 years than any trades person will ever have to endure.

  2. Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by mykepredko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anywhere else... not so much.

    A few points why bringing up a start up at Red Lobster works over basically any other kind of job:
    1. You can pick your hours and change them on a moment's notice.
    2. It's not brain heavy work. You can keep the start up as your primary focus.
    3. You don't have to worry about your employer accusing you of using their resources (and IP) to start a business.

    It actually makes a lot of sense to get a job working at Starbucks/Red Lobster/serving food anywhere when doing a start up to ensure that the rent isn't something you're worried about and you can put that extra focus on the startup.

    1. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Is crap. They pretty much shuffle your hours around as they see fit and tell you to kick rocks if you don't like it.

    2. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Servers trade shifts all the time.

    3. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      But if your day job is coding, you can work on your startup code at your day job. Even if your boss walks by, he is just going to see a screen full of code, and assume you are working hard. I did this for six months, and then right before I quit I got a glowing performance review and a raise. They never realized what was actually going on.

    4. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Is also crap. Anyone who has waited tables (and half decent at it) knows that it's physically and mentally exhausting.

    5. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This is where you have to start talking to people and ask them to trade shifts with you, and then convince them to actually do so. In other words, communication and salesmanship, two things you should have if you want to start your own business in the first place.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      It may make sense to hang on to your day job. But first of all, this guy wan't successful because he stayed at his job. If your startup isn't of the variety that you can slowly grow while revenue starts trickling in (like his); if it's more like the usual startup that requires a lot of hard work and attention up front, and a lot of time spent greasing palms to bring in some capital, then the statement "quit your day job is garbage advice" is garbage advice. To be honest I've seen more startup fail because of the founders not being able to "cross the chasm", often caused by lack of focus and resources, than because of the founders personal funds running dry.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been in the restaurant service industry? Yes: congratulations you have had a better experience than I and everyone else I know has. No: STFU. If you are bad at your job they will give you bad shifts that no one will trade. If you are good at your job they will never let you trade because they want YOU in that prime time rather than the drugged failure that gets the bad shifts.

    8. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I've worked back of house at mostly pretty fancy places.

      If a server sucks, they are generally just fired. Not like there is a shortage. If you suck, you don't get lunch, you get kicked.

      Competent servers switch shifts pretty regularly. Managers that get too pissy, get to hire the incompetent servers. It's a high turnover role.

      Which isn't to say Red Lobster and Olive Garden type places get great waitstaff, the bills are too low for the waitstaff to make good money there.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Informative

      1. You can pick your hours and change them on a moment's notice.

      I'm guessing you never worked in food service if you are saying this. While it's true these types of jobs offer some scheduling flexibility, they certainly don't let you pick your own hours or change them at a moment's notice. At most restaurants shifts are usually scheduled a week or so out and if you don't like it you better find someone to trade shifts with or you are most likely SOL.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    10. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      From the article and the post, it seems better idea to get a Night job for IT Guys working helpdesk from 5-1 sleep from 2-10 your business from 11-4, and work on your business during the day. You won't have free time, but 5 hours a week to get your company going can be good until you can justify yourself working full time.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty sleazy. My morals wouldn't let me do that. Sorry your parents didn't do a better job.

    12. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by farble1670 · · Score: 1, Informative

      1. You can pick your hours and change them on a moment's notice.

      Ah, so you've never worked in a restaurant (or probably in the service industry at all).

      You don't get to pick your hours. Restaurants need staffing at particular hours. If you decide not to work at your scheduled time, they are screwed and you won't be around for long. Clearly he didn't do that if we worked there for 5 years.

    13. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by farble1670 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But if your day job is coding, you can work on your startup code at your day job. Even if your boss walks by, he is just going to see a screen full of code, and assume you are working hard. I did this for six months, and then right before I quit I got a glowing performance review and a raise. They never realized what was actually going on.

      So basically you were stealing from your employer for 6 months. Bravo!

      Maybe your mommy never taught you this, but rule as to whether an action is moral is not whether you can get away with it.

    14. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      A better job is a night time security guard position. For the most part, you are required to sit at a desk, and most jobs allow you to read.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    15. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realise that your former employer now owns all of your IP?

    16. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      For that very reason I sometimes really miss my old night shift security job. Being able to read a book for 75% of my working hours was very nice.

    17. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who never worked in a restaurant in their life.

      Unless you know of waitresses that get done with their 8+ hour shift of walking for miles and carrying the equivalent of a bag of cement half the time, who then smile and put on their dancing shoes.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    18. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I got yelled at because the manager didn't understand me when I told her what day I was quitting, to go to college.

      I basically told her, "I can work until next Friday, but then I'm done." She thought I meant two Friday's from then. So, on my last day, I got yelled at when I told her I wouldn't be there for the scheduled shift on Saturday.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    19. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      But if your day job is coding, you can work on your startup code at your day job. Even if your boss walks by, he is just going to see a screen full of code, and assume you are working hard. I did this for six months, and then right before I quit I got a glowing performance review and a raise. They never realized what was actually going on.

      So basically you were stealing from your employer for 6 months. Bravo!

      Maybe your mommy never taught you this, but rule as to whether an action is moral is not whether you can get away with it.

      You are abusing the word "stealing" much like the MPAA/RIA do. Was he being underproductive? Absolutely! Was he stealing? Not without stretching the definition into extra-dimensions, twisted loops

    20. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Worked at a bar through University. Never a problem swapping shifts - just don't be a dick and be willing to help other people out when they want to swap.

    21. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Some states have laws that your employer can't have stuff you did outside work hours, outside the work place, and not using employer-provided tools. No state has laws that your employer doesn't own what you did while at work. If ShanghaiBill's former employer ever does realize what was going on, he's in trouble.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    22. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was paid a salary to do a job he didn't complete within a reasonable timeframe, then I'd argue he was stealing company time. The fact that he got a satisfactory performance review suggests that he was doing his job within expectations.

    23. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by rmullig2 · · Score: 1

      If he was doing the work assigned to him what is the problem? Would it be better for him to be on Facebook or standing around conversing with the girls in the office? A developer is generally judged on the work he produces not the amount of time he spends on it. If this person can do the work in half the time and isn't assigned anything further then why not work on other coding projects? Wouldn't that make him better at this job?

    24. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Was he stealing? Not without stretching the definition into extra-dimensions, twisted loops

      No, he was committing fraud: His boss was paying him to do X. His boss knew this, and he knew this. Instead, he did Y, while continuing to accept money for doing the X that he wasn't doing. IOW, he was taking the boss' money under false pretences. Which is just a different name for...

      I think you should be able to connect the remaining dots for yourself.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    25. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by djinn6 · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't be fraud if he does both X and Y. It wouldn't even be false advertising. Try flipping the roles around: you don't order a pizza and expect the pizza joint to only serve you and not make pizza for other people. You pay for a pizza, you get a pizza. What the pizza joint does the rest of the time is none of your business.

      Businesses think they own someone just because they pay them.

    26. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. Its not stealing.
      Its actually fraud.
      Feel better about your ethics?

    27. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by guises · · Score: 1

      The *AAs use the word stealing when they talk about duplicating - copyright infringement produces two copies of the same work, the original owner hasn't lost anything. The parent is talking about accepting money to perform work, then not doing that work. His employer has lost money in the scenario, and received nothing in return.

      While this probably would not be called stealing in court, you can see, I hope, that the one thing is more similar to stealing than the other.

    28. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      You are abusing the word "stealing" much like the MPAA/RIA do. Was he being underproductive? Absolutely! Was he stealing? Not without stretching the definition into extra-dimensions, twisted loops

      Yes, that's exactly the kind of rationalizing that most low-lifes employ to allow them to fall asleep at night content that, really, they are a good person.

      You are right, it's probably not "stealing". But it's much more than being unproductive.

      If you need to decide if any action is moral or not, you just need to think what the world would be like if everyone acted in the same way. If everyone sat around and didn't do their jobs whilst they day-dreamed about another job, the economy would fall apart. When this guy's startup takes off, remember that HIS employees will also be sitting around not doing the job he pays them to do either.

    29. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't be fraud if he does both X and Y. It wouldn't even be false advertising. Try flipping the roles around: you don't order a pizza and expect the pizza joint to only serve you and not make pizza for other people. You pay for a pizza, you get a pizza. What the pizza joint does the rest of the time is none of your business.

      Businesses think they own someone just because they pay them.

      Well first, he wasn't doing X and Y. He was just doing Y, by his words. Second, and you might want to sit down for this, but employers expect you to be 100% working for them during the hours they are paying you to work. How would you feel if you hired a housekeeper and paid them for 4 hours, only to find out they took a nap for 3 of them? Work 4 hours and get paid for 4. Or work 1 hour and get paid for 1. Either is fine.

    30. Re: Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then I guess the lesson here is to know how good to be: Better than so bad that they fire you, but not so good that you get a key asset that can't decide his own shifts.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      employers expect you to be 100% working for them during the hours they are paying you to work.

      They pay for 40 hours, but they expect you to work 80. There's nothing wrong with spending "work" time doing other stuff if they want to call you in at night and on the weekends. If they want more they can pay overtime.

      How would you feel if you hired a housekeeper and paid them for 4 hours, only to find out they took a nap for 3 of them?

      If my house is clean they can nap as much as they want.

    32. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was getting paid to work for them and yet he was working for himself. That there is theft - taking money you are not owed.

    33. Re:Good advice if you work at Red Lobster by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      False analogy. You're contracting the services of the pizza joint on a per-product and not per-unit-time basis.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  3. "I just had to sacrifice time." by Immerman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because everyone knows money is far more valuable than time...

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    1. Re:"I just had to sacrifice time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Depends on what your time is worth.

    2. Re:"I just had to sacrifice time." by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Time is money.

      It's fairly easy to convert time to money, provided you have a job, of course.

      It's pretty hard to do it the other way 'round. And the few times you can, it tends to be expensive. Ask Steve Jobs how it worked out for him.

      In other words, when you have the choice, sacrifice money instead. It's cheaper.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:"I just had to sacrifice time." by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Time is money.

      But, I learned in Volunteers that money is money:

      Chung Mee: Speed is important in business. Time is money.
      Lawrence Bourne III: You said opium was money.
      Chung Mee: Money is Money.
      Lawrence Bourne III: Well then, what is time again?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:"I just had to sacrifice time." by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The advice is obvious anyway. You can't work for your startup if you don't have money, and you won't have the money without a day job or a mentally deficient venture capitalist. The day job is easier and more honest.

    5. Re:"I just had to sacrifice time." by Immerman · · Score: 1

      It's dismaying how few people really make the connection - can't tell you how many times I've had variations on the conversation of "Would you work X hours at your job in trade for thing Y? No? Then why would you pay X hours worth of paycheck for it?"

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:"I just had to sacrifice time." by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      My calculation whether I do something myself or get it done usually hinges on how long it takes me to do it and how much money I could make in that time working. If that's more than what the professional costs, someone gets a job and I rather do mine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. And free food. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Funny

    He probably got to eat for free, and take home left overs and feed rest of his family too. Saved money definitely. Only compromise is having to agree that what Red Lobster dishes out is food then have the gumption to eat it.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:And free food. by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      He probably got to eat for free, and take home left overs and feed rest of his family too. Saved money definitely. Only compromise is having to agree that what Red Lobster dishes out is food then have the gumption to eat it.

      Yes, because that's totally how it works at big chain restaurants...

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  5. Suvivor Bias by FFOMelchior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most billionaires probably have garbage advice, once you separate out the survivor bias. That said, this tidbit makes more sense than most.

    1. Re:Suvivor Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never listen to advice from billionaires. They hate competition.

    2. Re:Suvivor Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the "Survivorship bias" or a "survival bias".

    3. Re:Suvivor Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't. All you have to sacrifice is time!? You've got to be fucking kidding me.

    4. Re:Suvivor Bias by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Suvivor Bias by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Most billionaires probably have garbage advice, once you separate out the survivor bias. That said, this tidbit makes more sense than most.

      Well, if you can work you day job and run your own side business successfully and still have time for friends, family, love interests, hobbies etc. because it's still 24 hours a day. I mean it's great if you can kick start it that way without making a leap of faith, but I think a lot of successful college dropouts would say the dedication was necessary. It's hard to say in retrospect that it wasn't, it's easy to say in retrospect that you just built brick upon brick for the few who manage to do it that way.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Suvivor Bias by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      I've always liked comedian Bo Burnham's advice. He clearly gets it.

  6. I just had to sacrifice time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the trade-off. Different people will make different trade-offs
      "Time is the most valuable thing a man can spend" - Theophrastus

  7. A garbage advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First - you're missing an 'a', and second - keep doing a mindless, thankless, demeaning work after you don't have to do it anymore is the shittiest advice, ever. I know people who say if it wasn't for their job, they wouldn't know what to do with themselves. There is _literally_ an infinite number of things and stuff you can do when you don't have to go to work. Almost an infinity of them are a better experience. And if you don't like any of them, you can always kill yourself.

    1. Re:A garbage advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >First - you're missing an 'a'
      Both 'garbage' and 'advice' are uncountable nouns.

    2. Re:A garbage advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it's good advice. That shitty job is not as bad as starting a new business, which has a extremely high probability of failure. Do you want the high stress of paying bills when it fails or doesn't generate enough revenue? I don't think so. Also businesses require more expenses than the revenue it generates, at least initially. So you need an income source to capitalize that business.

    3. Re:A garbage advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm referring to the 'a' in its role as an indefinite article. The garbage advice - in this case - quitting your job, is being a general statement. Not having an 'a' is just weird.

    4. Re:A garbage advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is way better to reduce your means of living to be more inline with your income, or your already earned money. Everybody is pushing for more and more expensive life and complaining about "paying the bills" is a classic pastime in the western culture. If it comes to choosing between working extra and giving up on some bullshit, then it is down to your personal ambitions towards grandure.

    5. Re:A garbage advice by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      Selling clothes (ie, FUBU) is a day job. The purchasers you need to talk to to get your stuff in store are 9-to-5ers. I'd guess that this guy was running his hustle pretty much that whole time and not quite making the bills. Maybe there's things he can do to stretch the hours - call stores out of timezone, production details, etc - but the short version sounds like his business wasn't really making enough profit to pay him the salary he wanted. Or that he though business profits would return much more than his time.

      Food service does let you work evenings. If you get along with other staff, or can bribe them with a hot new shirt, they're often happy to pickup an extra shift. Basically, as your side-hustle grows, there's a point where you should look at your day job as the side-hustle.

      "Reduce your expenses" is great advice if you're making $60k and struggling. It's not very helpful if you're making $20k.

    6. Re:A garbage advice by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      As already noted, "advice" is an uncountable noun. You can say "the advice" or "some advice" or "a piece of advice". You can't say "an advice".

      If that sounds "weird" to you, then you're either not a native speaker or not very well educated.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  8. Isn't the saying 'dont quit your day job' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's telling people to quit their day jobs? is that a thing now? fuck this generation gets dumber ever time i read an article about them.

    1. Re:Isn't the saying 'dont quit your day job' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Came here to say that the popular advice has always been "DON'T quit your day job." In fact, I've never heard it the other way until this story.

      I'm guessing this is a case of people ignoring the negative qualifier. E.g. If you say "I heard that ${name} actually isn't a pedophile," all people will remember is "${name} is a pedophile."

    2. Re:Isn't the saying 'dont quit your day job' by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Who's telling people to quit their day jobs?

      Amway, when you're floundering and they want to lock you in.

  9. it's not IF you quit your day job it's WHEN by green1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary says you shouldn't quit your day job, but obviously he did because he doesn't still wait tables at Red Lobster. It's about WHEN you quit your day job.

    This will be a fairly personal decision, but a bunch of factors come in to play. first of all, if you can't survive on the money your startup is providing, then obviously you need to keep your day job. And once you can make more money running your own company than spending that same time at your day job, it's a no-brainer to quit to focus on your startup. The real challenge is the in-between states, and that's going to depend on your opinion of your existing job. Is it something you enjoy? and does it provide you the flexibility to work on the other project that you're passionate about? in that case stick around. Is it something you despise? Do you absolutely detest going to work each morning? is it interfering with your passions? In that case it may be worth taking a pay cut to work on your startup.

  10. Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Have a day job that pays the bills and work a side business that brings in cash flow.

    1. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, be an unlikable basement dweller. That way you won't spend any of your hard-earned $20 a month on things like dates, or going out to socialize with friends.

    2. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's that side hustle working out for you, fat cocksucker? Good? Sucking lots of cock?

    3. Re:Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Also, be an unlikable basement dweller.

      Unless you live in a Victorian, there aren't many basements on the West Coast.

      That way you won't spend any of your hard-earned $20 a month on things like dates, or going out to socialize with friends.

      I saw Wonder Woman in IMAX with friends last week. Next week I'll be seeing Boston and Joan Jett with friends.

      http://www.shorelineamp.org/events/boston-the-band-joan-jett-and-the-blackhearts-3079688/

    4. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be brave. Admit your friends are imaginary friends.

    5. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "side business" selling ebooks with 0, ZERO, NADA sales, and a horrible website with "confidential" sales figures? That you yourself spilled a few hours later?

      Narcissistic personality disorder:

      Requiring constant admiration
      Having a sense of entitlement

    6. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since just a few weeks ago you claimed to be earning less than $50k in Silicon Valley, and in SV even janitors make more than that, why should anyone take financial advice from you?

    7. Re:Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That you yourself spilled a few hours later?

      Citation, please.

      Narcissistic personality disorder:

      You're confusing me with Trump.

    8. Re:Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Since just a few weeks ago you claimed to be earning less than $50k in Silicon Valley [...]

      I made $55K last year with an extra month of pay as a Christmas bonus.

      How much was your Christmas bonus last year? You didn't get one? I'm sorry to hear that. Work harder this year and maybe Santa Trump will drop coal in your stockings.

      [...] why should anyone take financial advice from you?

      What's more important: the advice or the messenger?

    9. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's more important: the advice or the messenger?

      Both the advice and the messenger are big fat turds.

    10. Re:Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Both the advice and the messenger are big fat turds.

      If you can't consider the advice separately from the messenger, you're missing out on great advice that could change your life. And then some people wonder why their lives never change for the better.

    11. Re:Or better yet... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'I don't practice what I preach, because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to!'

      J.R. Bob Dobbs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      'I don't practice what I preach, because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to!'

      J.R. Bob Dobbs.

      Yet you people call me a narcissist. I don't think Trump can outdo Bob.

    13. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't consider the advice separately from the messenger, you're missing out on great advice that could change your life. And then some people wonder why their lives never change for the better.

      That's hilarious coming from you, when you've been given absolutely fantastic advice on diet & exercise here, that you've responded to by sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting, "LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU ASSHATS!"

      How's it feel missing out on all the good advice you're offered for free here by your intellectual superiors?

    14. Re:Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      How's it feel missing out on all the good advice you're offered for free here by your intellectual superiors?

      I have no regrets about not being on the Super Size Me diet, the Snickers diet or the 21 Eggs diet.

    15. Re: Or better yet... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      So, I've been quietly observing. Rest assured, I am not one of the ACs. I have a question, probably several.

      The most important is why do you bother responding?

      I had a Slashdot stalker and I responded because I kinda enjoyed the banter, attention, and infamy. I'm curious about your motivations.

      I also have some killer cole slaw, but that's not really important. I just wanted to share. It's fucking delicious.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    16. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right here, you fat stupid fuck.

      https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10702965&cid=54561479

    17. Re:Or better yet... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Bob is not a narcissist. It really is all about him...

      If the net had existed 30 years ago, Bob would be called a hate meme.

      Bleeding head of Tiger Woods...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Right here, you fat stupid fuck.

      The ad revenues I get from Slashdot barely covers the subscription cost for The Wall Street Journal each month. It's a drop in the bucket to the the total ad revenues I get from all sources, and ad revenues represents a small slice of the gross income for my side business. Note that total ad revenues and gross income are confidential information.

    19. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You slippery eel, redefining and shifting the goal posts... again.

      You lying, hypocritical, mentally ill piece of shit.

    20. Re: Or better yet... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I had a Slashdot stalker and I responded because I kinda enjoyed the banter, attention, and infamy. I'm curious about your motivations.

      I do it pretty much for the same reasons. I also like trolling the trolls.

    21. Re:Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be ruling out the possibility that basement dwellers could be friends with each other.

    22. Re: Or better yet... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I kinda miss my stalker. They were great for my ego.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  11. also, Never follow your passion.... by slew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never follow your passion, but always bring it with you. -- Mike Rowe

    https://www.prageru.com/sites/...

    There are only two things I can tell you today that come with absolutely no agenda. The first is “Congratulations.” The second is “Good luck.” Everything else is what I like to call, “The Dirty Truth,” which is just another way of saying, “It’s my opinion.”

    And in my opinion, you have all been given some terrible advice, and that advice, is this:

    Follow your passion.

    Every time I watch the Oscars, I cringe when some famous movie star—trophy in hand—starts to deconstruct the secret of their success. It’s always the same thing: “Don’t let anyone tell you that you don’t have what it takes, kid!”; and the ever popular, “Never give up on your dreams!”

    Look, I understand the importance of persistence, and the value of encouragement, but who tells a stranger to never give up on their dreams, without even knowing what it is they’re dreaming? How can Lady Gaga possibly know where your passion will lead you?

    Have these people never seen American Idol?

    Year after year, thousands of aspiring American Idols show up with great expectations, only to learn that they don’t possess the skills they thought they did. What’s really amazing though, is not their lack of talent—the world is full of people who can’t sing. It’s their genuine shock at being rejected—the incredible realization that their passion and their ability had nothing to
    do with each other.

    Look, if we’re talking about your hobby, by all means let your passion lead you. But when it comes to making a living, it’s easy to forget the dirty truth: just because you’re passionate about something doesn’t mean you won’t suck at it.

    And just because you’ve earned a degree in your chosen field, doesn’t mean you’re gonna find your “dream job.”

    Dream Jobs are usually just that—dreams. But their imaginary existence just might keep you from exploring careers that offer a legitimate chance to perform meaningful work and develop a genuine passion for the job you already have. Because here’s another Dirty Truth: your happiness on the job has very little to do with the work itself.

    On Dirty Jobs, I remember a very successful septic tank cleaner, a multi-millionaire, who told me the secret to his success:

    “I looked around to see where everyone else was headed,” he said, “And then I went the opposite way. Then I got good at my work. Then I began to prosper. And then one day, I realized I was passionate about other people’s crap.”

    I’ve heard that same basic story from welders, plumbers, carpenters, electricians, HVAC professionals, hundreds of other skilled tradesmen who followed opportunity—not passion— and prospered as a result.

    Consider the reality of the current job market.Right now, millions of people with degrees and diplomas are out there competing for a relatively narrow set of opportunities that polite society calls “good careers.” Meanwhile, employers are struggling to fill nearly 5.8 million jobs that nobody’s trained to do. This is the skills gap, it’s real, and its cause is actually very simple: when people follow their passion, they miss out on all kinds of opportunities they didn’t even know existed.

    When I was 16, I wanted to follow in my grandfather’s footsteps. He was a skilled tradesman who could build a house without a blueprint. That was my passion, and I followed it for years. I took all the shop classes at school, I did all I could to absorb the knowledge and skill that came so easily to my granddad.

    Unfortunately, the ha

    1. Re:also, Never follow your passion.... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Mike Rowe seems to be an all-around great thinker and explainer. Wish he were my neighbor or something.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  12. Bad advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit your job and get government assistance while you do your startup. Then when you get rich you can find ways to hide your wealth from the government, avoid giving back as much as possible, tell the public you would be happy to pay more taxes (while avoiding them as much as possible), treat your workers like shit, and then give small amounts to charity so you show Tue world how morally superior you are.

    1. Re:Bad advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This guy is living the life. Surf during the day, plays with his band at night. Bags more hot chicks than most of you will ever talk to.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568109/Unemployed-beach-bum-uses-food-stamps-eat-lobster-drives-Escalade-says-help-make-millions.html

      During a later interview with the Huffington Post, Greenslate added: 'I don't feel like a bum. I pull hot chicks, drive nice cars, dress nice and wear the most baddest jewelry in the world.' During the segment, Greenslate is seen driving expensive cars, drinking beer and grilling lobsters with his friends.

      Before the cookout, cameras followed Greenslate into a grocery store and watched him purchase the food with his government-issued Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) card. With the card - which only needs to be renewed once a year - Greenslate is given $200 a month for food. There is no requirement that he even look for employment.

    2. Re:Bad advice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. The Huffington post would never cover that story...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  13. "I just had to sacrifice time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, we can always earn more time, right?

  14. Not if your job is a REAL JOB... by zenasprime · · Score: 1

    it demands both your time and mental energy. You will never be able to put the time and energy you need to invest into that new enterprise if you are working 40-50 hour weeks at something unrelated. Making something new succeed take work, lots and lots of real, multiple hour per day work. Very few people are capable of spending 20 hours a day running at full speed. Those who can succeed by doing so are the outliers, not the standard.

    The only way you will ever have enough time and energy to put into a career shift or new entrepreneurial adventure is if you make a plan and take the risk.

    That said, the best advice I've ever hear about the conundrum of working and career shift/dream jobs is to work full time and save at least half the money you make. You can quit that day job when you are able to fun your new enterprise with the money you have saved. If you've saved half your years salary, you then have a years worth of money to live off of while you engage in your (hopefully) new enterprise.

    Getting experience in the job you want to make for yourself is immensely important as well, so if you can work a day job where you are gaining experience at the thing you want to do, especially if you can manage to find yourself someone who is willing to mentor you along the way, then you will learn the lessons you need to learn before you flail about on your own.

    Many people fail their new enterprises, not necessarily because they lack skill in whatever discipline in the field, but because they failed to realize that half or more of their new job is actually running a business. Talk to and make friends with successful business owners. They don't always have to be in your field, but they will probably have a lot of insight into how to manage doing what you love doing along side of making sure that your business or new career remains viable.

  15. Actors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is why the Actor/Waiter trope is so common.

    In theory, the food service schedule is flexible - but that depends a lot on where you're working. Fast food and fast casual (Red Lobster probably is the latter) are moving to a "just in time" scheduling paradigm. They forecast their labor needs, and you show up when they tell you. If you're lucky, you might be able to trade shifts, but the whole JIT scheduling system also makes sure that people don't work more than a certain number of hours/week (to make sure the employer doesn't have to pay for certain legally required benefits) and OT calculations and all that.

    OTOH if you're wait-staff or kitchen crew at a small chain or one-off place, and the owner/manager is willing to work with the crew, then sure.

    And if you're starting at 30 hrs/week and ask to go down to 20 or 15, that's probably doable too.

    BTW, 40k/year (TFA example) at full time is $20/hr, pretax. I'm going to guess that Red Lobster doesn't pay $20/hr.

    1. Re:Actors? by ranton · · Score: 2

      Fast food and fast casual (Red Lobster probably is the latter) are moving to a "just in time" scheduling paradigm

      This is just one example of how bad a lot of advice from earlier generations can be when applied directly to more recent generations. There were a whole slew of mindless jobs which paid a decent wage two decades ago which are far less desirable now. I for one was able to support myself just fine on $8/hour working at KFC nearly full time in college (except for tuition, that was all loans and my parents' college fund). But rent prices in my college town are more than double what they were 20 years ago, and I'd be lucky to make $10/hour today at the same job. And tuition has more than doubled as well.

      Advice from those who have succeeded is nearly always worth listening to, but you need to be very careful about how much value you give to that advice. The economy and workforce simply changes too much from generation to generation today.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:Actors? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      $20 / hour is not unrealistic for servers, who are getting tips of 15% of what you eat, on average. If you're a good server, you may get even more than that.

      That's why a lot of people who are wait staff in college might still pick up some shifts after graduation.

      Of course the trick is you want to be working a busy night like Friday or Saturday. Monday you might be lucky to pick up $2 an hour

    3. Re:Actors? by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      Advice from those who have succeeded is nearly always worth listening to, but you need to be very careful about how much value you give to that advice. The economy and workforce simply changes too much from generation to generation today.

      Whisky and 15 cigarettes a day is the secret of my good health says Dorothy as she celebrates her 100th birthday

      Unfortunately it is usually much hard to tell which people ended up overcoming their own horrible believes (now offered up as advice,) instead of succeeding because of them

    4. Re:Actors? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Wait staff at nice restaurants regularly clear six figures, mostly tax free.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  16. He was working less than 50 hrs a wk on 2 jobs? by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Hell, most entrepreneurs that I know are putting in a minimum of 60 a week and its usually closer to over 70 hours a week.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  17. I wrote my first novel while working 60/week by netsavior · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was working as a software developer on a very demanding project, pulling 60+ hours a week most weeks while I wrote my first novel.

    It was a long process, and it was very hard, and yes I had no free time between my money job and my passionate speculative job.
    As time went on I finally finished the book, and sold thousands of copies.

    I am proud to say that today I make 6 figures a year...





    ...as a software developer, because that's my real job and nearly every novelist who ever lived didn't make a living at it, and it is important to have realistic dreams.

    1. Re:I wrote my first novel while working 60/week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How novel of you!

    2. Re:I wrote my first novel while working 60/week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am proud to say that today I make 6 figures a year...

       

      What?! No no no, that can't be right, you're too expensive. You will be laid off in 3... 2... 1...

    3. Re:I wrote my first novel while working 60/week by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      That's an awesome achievement. You should link the book.

    4. Re:I wrote my first novel while working 60/week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stating that sort of thing online can make you an attractive target for identity thieves.

      Just sayin'.

      For my own part, I am not nearly as rich as you and never will be. Nothing to steal here....

    5. Re:I wrote my first novel while working 60/week by thermopile · · Score: 2
      Hey, me, too! Work as an engineer during the day, get to pretend I'm an author at other times. I think I've sold 200 copies, total, of two different books self-published on Amazon.

      It's an avocation, not a vocation. I'll buy a copy of yours if you buy a copy of mine... Life would be a lot different if I had to depend on the book income.

      --

      "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

  18. He should tell the other people on Shark Tank that by BLToday · · Score: 2

    I've seen enough Shark Tank to notice that the other judges are always saying "I can't invest with you because you don't believe enough in your idea to quit your day job" or "you're not 100% committed to this when you're not doing this full time."

  19. Bullshit advice by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like any from anyone who "made it big". And it's not even that they try to deceive and mislead you because they don't want you to succeed.

    Any time one of those self-made billionaires tells you how he made it and what to do, you're essentially listening to someone who won the jackpot in the life lottery telling you the numbers he played. At the same time, you could ask a thousand people who didn't make it who will tell you exactly the same, but they just didn't have the luck to be at that right place at the right time that this guy was.

    That what he did worked for him at that time when he did it is obvious. Just like playing those numbers on that day worked for the lottery player. You will not reliably repeat this by doing the same, for this too many variables changed in the game. Even if there was no FUBU today, opening a chain like this today would fail simply because the market changed and there is no longer the amount of young people with expendable money, just to name one factor that makes or breaks this business.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Bullshit advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My takeaway was to grow up and be childhood friends with one of the most famous/popular artists on the planet so that they can promote your product for free.

    2. Re:Bullshit advice by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, to be friends with the bimbo that picks the lottery numbers sure helps winning it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Bullshit advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true. Mod this up, whatever the fuck that means.

  20. That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a week by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most can't, and then get told they're a failure as a human being when they can't. The worst thing is lots of them believe it. That's where the race to the bottom starts.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't you be a failure of a human being if you couldn't work 70-80 hours a week? Realistically, unless you have other responsibilities, you should be able to easily work 100 hours a week. That's not even 16 hours every day!

    2. Re:That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most" "can't?" Citation needed.

    3. Re:That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a week by erice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why wouldn't you be a failure of a human being if you couldn't work 70-80 hours a week? Realistically, unless you have other responsibilities, you should be able to easily work 100 hours a week. That's not even 16 hours every day!

      The missing qualifiers are "while doing quality work" and "having quality of life".

      Most people don't even manage 40 hours per week of quality work. If working 70 hrs/week means your work quality suffers then your startup is almost certainly doomed. If your day job catches on to your declining work quality, you may lose that too.

      Sacrifice quality of life for too long and you get burnout, which also degrades quality of work.

  21. Re:He should tell the other people on Shark Tank t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could swear I've even heard Daymond spouting that crap on the show, too.

  22. Arnold Schwarzenegger use to give bad advise by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Informative

    to his competitors. When he was competing the competitions were pretty friendly and it didn't occur to anyone he'd lie to them. He gave them a routine that was massive overwork. They tried to stick to it and of course burned themselves out.

    What's the old saying? Never ask a man how he made his first million. Odds are if someone didn't inherit it or win the lottery they did something awful to get it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Arnold Schwarzenegger use to give bad advise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often think this when I encounter people online who are in day trading, or people who give stock tips, or advice on bitcoin, whatever.
      People giving advice could very well be hoping you're the sucker they sell to.

  23. Re:He should tell the other people on Shark Tank t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen enough Shark Tank to notice that the other judges are always saying "I can't invest with you because you don't believe enough in your idea to quit your day job" or "you're not 100% committed to this when you're not doing this full time."

    Another dirty secret is that they don't want you to live on any of the money they invest, lots of startup founders are living in their parents basement.

  24. Survivor bias by Xoltri · · Score: 1

    At the craps table, I only stand on my left foot, and I only talk in the third person, and I've won lots of money, so it should work for you too.

    --
    -Xoltri
  25. Priorities by jon3k · · Score: 1

    The end result is being a net worth of $300M. Who cares about a measly $200k for giving up that many hours of your life? 20 hours a week over how many years to increase your net worth by 0.06%? No thanks.

    1. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you will never be rich.
      he did all that work not just for $200K. he did it for $200K AT THAT POINT IN TIME. for him now $200K is nothing. for him then it was maybe 500% of his net worth.
      he also did it for the discipline to work long hours and chase a business. and also to learn multitasking.

    2. Re:Priorities by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      What he's saying is be careful. If you think you an quit your day job and become a millionaire, it won't happen. Not by itself, unless you get the redneck retirement plan - aka the lottery. Hey, someone wins. All of us are in the rat race to begin with. Wake up, work, come home, go to sleep repeat, sometimes for the rest of your life. If you want to go out on your own and quit, you have to have a team. Just like he did. You can bet he didn't do everything himself. You need a lawyer (can you do what you want to do or is it illegal? Legal advice is always cheaper than getting caught. Sometimes it can result in your arrest and incarceration (that's jail for some of us that don't know)), you need someone to handle the money (accounting), you need all kinds of people (etc). Once all of that is in place and you have the income coming in, you have money in the bank for a rainy day (6 months worth, at least), now you can quit your day job.

      Robert Kiyosaki can teach you. Read his book Rich Dad Poor Dad. Real good commentary on what happening today, though it was written a long time ago. Rich Dad - the guy that knows how things work (guys like Trump, Soros, guys like that) and Poor Dad who think they know a lot and really are clueless (socialists, most politicians in congress it seems). By the way, while Robert shows you with houses, it's not about houses. It's about business. It works if you want to do houses, cars, airplanes, commercial buildings, McDonalds, etc. Business is business. Some of these are easy, some of these can put you in the poor house fast. Especially if you don't know what you're doing.

  26. a mini-anthropic principle of sorts by slew · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the idea that whatever these billionaires did might not work for anyone else, what they did actually worked out for them. The counterfactual is that if they didn't do these things they wouldn't have their success. Hard to say, but because the odds are very long, I suspect that these elements were important *to them* even if it tainted by selection bias. Call it a mini-anthropic principle of sorts... Isn't that what they say about the lottery. You can't win if you don't play.

    Of course the environment that we all find ourselves in is different and constantly evolving, but at least we can take away from this free advice is that you don't really need to know shit to become a billionaire, but being lucky isn't sufficient either. You need to work hard and have the stomach to take some calculated risks. All the calculations in the world won't replace luck, but without those other elements, you may be lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time, but still have no chance. That isn't totally bad advice in the abstract about life in general even though the specifics for a person might be total bullshit for a different person.

    1. Re:a mini-anthropic principle of sorts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring the idea that whatever these billionaires did might not work for anyone else, what they did actually worked out for them. The counterfactual is that if they didn't do these things they wouldn't have their success.

      Another counterfactual is that they didn't do these things they would have been even more successful.

      If you are capable of building a successful business, I suspect that any time spent working at Red Lobster was a wasted opportunity (unless something specific about Red Lobster was integral to your success).

      I agree with GP. FUBU guy is engaging in post hoc ergo propter hoc. This is just another "everything you think you know about ____ is wrong!" story.

    2. Re:a mini-anthropic principle of sorts by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What you have here is a lottery jackpot millionaire telling you that his lucky numbers were 4, 6, 12, 28, 34 and 45, and you thinking that this is great advice. Can you win picking the same numbers? Sure. But there's like ten thousands of people out there who did just that and are still poor.

      The only non-bullshit in it is that putting your money on the 88 in a lottery that draws from a pool of 1 to 50 is not a good idea.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. Re: That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a wee by kaybee · · Score: 1

    Americans in manufacturing used to work an average of nearly 70 hours per week. So I'd say that it isn't an unrealistic number for most people.

    Source: https://eh.net/encyclopedia/hours-of-work-in-u-s-history/

  28. He's right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been part of several failed startups, plus a couple of very successful ones. The ones which failed the most spectacularly were the ones which had very early injections of seed money. The ideas were certainly viable, but the problem was that the investment took the immediate focus off of making money. Of course that was partly the point of the investment, to focus on development, however it was a strategic and grave mistake. In all cases, whenever the investments dried up, the ventures had to go out of business - because there were leases and employees and services to pay for, which could not be sustained.

    The most succesful ones started with nothing but, say, a $1500 line of credit at one distibutor and a corner in somebody's garage. At the very outset, every single transaction made money. They accepted no outside investments. They just kept cycling the profits back into the business, with a very low overhead, fanning the embers until there was so much work to do, they had to hire people to get it done - and before long find bigger space to do it in. One such company, a wholesale distributor which followed the telemarketing model of sales, grew no less than 35% annually for about 10 years before going public via merger. At the time of merger there were about 270 employees.

  29. Re: That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a wee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in manufacturing and currently work 90 hours a week. That said, I still make less than 40,000 USD. Americans are quite privileged making Donald Trump's rhetoric ever more perplexing.

  30. Another successful business man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...gives advice about how to become successful without bothering to work out why he didn't fail. He may well have had regular bowel movements. Does he recommend that in his recipe for business success too?

  31. "Shark Tank star" by Veilex · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me, but I have a problem with the idea of taking any sort of career advice from someone described as a "Shark Tank star" ... except, perhaps, on how to become star on Shark Tank.

  32. Re: That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a wee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, it was called...slavery if I remember correctly.

    Work 70+ hours in unpaid dirty jobs; the wet dream of many of today's industrialists.

      So I'd say that it isn't an unrealistic number for most people.

  33. Re: That's great if you can work 70-80 hours a wee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is talking about being unpaid? Of course, these people should be paid enough to pay for shelter, food, security, and family. That said, there are too many freeloaders who work only 60 hours a week or less and make way more. That's just unfair to people who actually work for their money.

  34. mykepredko speaks the truth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I am not his mom or his best bud.

    Startups are simultaneously a lot of fun and as depressing as shit because most of you (99.9%) will fail and by the time you admit that you're burned out and lost all confidence. If you don't have something to put the breaks on you'll keep hacking even though your smarts and quality of work turns to shit and you don't realize it.
     
    In the morning your brain is fresh, but by late in the day your brain has turned to mush anyway. A job without much responsibility is a relief. You can pay the rent and stop worrying about that. Hang out with coworkers which will likely be mostly nice because few crave aspire to keys at the Red Lobster executive washroom so without the backstabbing that takes place in startup land - (don't claim you know a man until you've worked in his startup!), and you remind yourself there is life during and after startup. And when you do get back to work the next day, your brain is fresh.

  35. Life expectancy? Health and enjoying life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life expectancy? Health and enjoying life?

    Sorry, there is no reason for people to work such outrageous numbers of hours.

    Unless they are being paid double overtime and choosing to do so.

  36. Like Trump the more you post the more you reveal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Trump the more you post the more you reveal.

    And it ain't pretty.

    Is Karma a Bitch? I imagine you hope not.

  37. They also used to die in their 30s by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    so yeah, there's that too.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  38. 20% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he takes a 20% cut right off the top of his merchanidse?
    FUBU sounds like overpriced crap.