Slashdot Mirror


Nutella Used An Algorithm To Design 7 Million Unique Labels (inc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Inc. Millions of Italians can now say they own a one-of-a-kind Nutella jar. In February, 7 million jars appeared on shelves in Italy, all of them boasting a unique label design... "An algorithm has usurped the traditional role of a designer," writes design magazine Dezeen. There are jars with polka dots. Jars with zigzags. Jars with splotchy shapes. All sorts of other patterns, too... All 7 million jars sold out within a month... Due to the sell-out success of these jars, Nutella is reportedly launching the same campaign soon in other European countries, starting with France.
The article includes a video showing some of the labels. The algorithm always kept the original logo, but then "pulled from dozens of patterns and thousands of color combination."

95 comments

  1. This is related to chocolate how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange way to combine graphics and processed food.

    1. Re:This is related to chocolate how? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      This is related to chocolate because it sold seven million units of sugar paste, with a touch of nuts and chocolate, in record time.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:This is related to chocolate how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I bet you're a real hoot at parties.

    3. Re:This is related to chocolate how? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Procedural graphics and processed food go well together.

    4. Re:This is related to chocolate how? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because both make me puke?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    imagine the hours that designers could have put in had all 7 million of these labels been done by PEOPLE instead of a fucking computer.

    1. Re:so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by Goglu · · Score: 0

      If it was to be done by people, it just wouldn't have happened... And the world would be poorer from these great new masterpieces.

      This really shows how much algorithms enrich our lives!

    2. Re:so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      "It pulled from dozens of patterns and thousands of color combinations."

      So, human designer(s) made those dozens of patterns and a computer simply picked colours at random.

      I'm sorry but even the random dungeons of Diablo 1 (1996) are a more impressive feat than this marketing stunt.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we're reading about and discussing this marketing stunt on Slashdot, so it was a pretty good marketing stunt because its free advertising. Their strategy makes people think they were getting something unique, a literal one in a (seven) million. As a tactic I think it plays in well to the desire of so many to feel special and probably allows for all manner of viral marketing when those plonkers post images of their one-of-a-kind Nutella jar to Instagram, Facebook, or whatever people are using these days. If one stops to think about it, there isn't really anything in being special if everyone is special, but I don't believe most people will pause to have that thought.

    4. Re:so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Procedural graphics is the way to go in computer graphics and digital media. Normally, every time you add a new option, it becomes a pain to try and combine it with all the others. But when doing things automatically, all those options suddenly give you way more combinations and choice; orientation (x360 choices), straight lines vs. wavy lines (x2), spots or no spots (x2), choice of ten different pastel colors arranged randomly used only once each (10 factorial = x3628800)

    5. Re: so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by easyTree · · Score: 1

      I'd be more interested of the ingredients were subject to randomness: "Maybe *you* will be the one in seven million where the randomly-chosen-balance of ingredients provide health benefits! Buy now to take your chances!"

    6. Re:so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but even the random dungeons of Diablo 1 (1996) are a more impressive feat than this marketing stunt.

      If all you focus on is looks, then you miss the big picture. They just registered 7 million more trademark looks. They are the only company that will get to do this from now on. they can sue everyone else for copying them now. Brilliant marketing strategy.

    7. Re: so AI has claimed yet more jobs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Luddite!

      Only the nutelliest of appy apps can design more unique apps so that you can eat the app and then app app.

      Apps!

  3. Algorithm? by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely they mean "AI"??? Any algorithm is AI in 2017.

    1. Re:Algorithm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bubble sort took my jerb!

    2. Re: Algorithm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poster is a bot, ignore it.

    3. Re: Algorithm? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      His name kinda gave it away.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Algorithm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't take a break from shitting on the term "AI" even in articles that don't mention it? Why not bitch about space nutters, too? Nutella, nutters... they're practically endorsing living on Mars.

    5. Re: Algorithm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AI is a AI, ignore it.

      FTFY

  4. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If 7 million people each have a unique jar, what do you resell these unique jars for on Ebay? Double the original price? Triple? $900? $5 million?

    Are jars with uneaten contents worth more than eaten or partially eaten jars? How do we differentiate between genuine and fake labels?

    THERE IS A MARKET HERE, and I will get filthy rich from it.

    1. Re:But... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting, actually. They've created a micro-level of scarcity that does not exist on the macro scale.

      People respond to scarcity, and they've just proven it again.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:But... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They're as unique as fingerprints. So does that make them valuable? Probably not.

      What would make some of them valuable is if there were many identical ones and only a select few that are special. Because despite being unique, none of them is special.

      And what people want is special, not unique.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. I'm Unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like everyone else.

    1. Re:I'm Unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God has a special plan for you. It involves a dreary life and meaningless death - just like everyone else!

  6. Only 7 million? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Any two-bit programmer can write a program to make 1677216 unique pixels. Colour me unimpressed.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Only 7 million? by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      1677216 unique pixels. Colour me unimpressed.

      What's the hex code for 'unimpressed' ?

    2. Re:Only 7 million? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any two-bit programmer can write a program to make 1677216 unique pixels.

      Wait, wouldn't that require a 24-bit programmer?

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re:Only 7 million? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      0x000000 (or #000000 for the web-heads), obviously.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Only 7 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a two-bit programmer will just take 12 times longer and at minimum wage, that is still cheaper than the alternative.

    5. Re:Only 7 million? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Any two-bit programmer can write a program to make 1677216 unique pixels. Colour me unimpressed.

      You should be much more impressed.

      Any 2-bit programmer will know their powers of 2, so they can easily create 16777216 colors.

    6. Re:Only 7 million? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Damn you, evil Dr. Typo! You got me again!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re: Only 7 million? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that more than two bit.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  7. So glad... by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 3, Funny

    That I find the stuff as tasty as a dog turd.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    1. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what a dog turd tastes like? eeeww!

    2. Re:So glad... by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

      One student prank later and yes I did taste it once.

      --
      I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    3. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you admit to tasting a dog turd!

    4. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that actually happened to you, it wasn't a prank.

  8. So? by orlanz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They had a computer randomly segment a piece of paper, plug in a random sampling of patterns, and then wrap the paper around a jar. Not exactly "replacing a designer team" (then again it is Italy).

    I think more credit is due to the Marketing team that realized this could sell jars. Job well done.

    1. Re:So? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If anything, this just shows how flexible their printers can be on a commercial scale.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:So? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      Time magazine used to print my name and address in the advertisement, print how my rep voted for a particular bill

      It was black and white, dot matrix printer with some misalignment. But that was 15 years ago. Should be surprised only if commercial scale printers can't take a new image for every label.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this guy up, printing seven million unique labels, is the real news.

    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything, this just shows how flexible their printers can be on a commercial scale.

      About 5-7 years ago I had some dealings with a printer because my employer had textbooks printed. Their fairly modern printers (this was in South Africa) employed some inkjet technology that made small runs entirely feasible. Want 50 copies of your book or even 5? No problem. Gone were the days of needing a large run to make something economical. They of course also did all the normal printing jobs like flyers and pamphlets, with the normal selections of stock, inks, and cutting.

    5. Re:So? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      But we're talking about commercial scale. If you only want 50 copies of a book, then sure, you could use inkjet technologies to print 50 books with unique features. We're talking about 7 million unique items, though, and in four-color process, too. I doubt it would have been possible 5-7 years ago.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  9. what if by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    What if the algorithm makes a copywritten artwork? Who do you sue?

    1. Re:what if by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      What if the algorithm makes a copywritten artwork? Who do you sue?

      The company that makes it. Of course, damages will be small, since there's only one jar for each pattern.

    2. Re:what if by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I remember my favourite webcomic (well, almost the only webcomic I follow with any regularity) addressing the idea of copyright trolling a few years back. 2011, I see.

      Scene setting.

      The scope of the problem and first proposed solution.

      The second proposal.

      We're gonna need a bigger universe.

      I like "Freefall". It asks all sorts of interesting questions, like this recent sub-theme.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  10. "Dozens of patterns" by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dozens of patterns, thousands of color combinations

    So they just randomized the colors on preexisting patterns? Not particularly impressive.

    1. Re:"Dozens of patterns" by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      I wasn't particularly impressed either, even without "doing the numbers" :

      7 million combinations ; "dozens of patterns", thousands of colour combinations.
      Let's guess at 2.5 dozen = 30 patterns. A nice round number. And the same palettes for "first" and "second" colours. I make that around 484 colours in the palette. If there are three variable colours, the palette goes down to a mere 62 colours.

      It's amusing, but not particularly impressive. You know, if I have a mere 10 variable elements in a design (say, a pattern of dots that can be one of "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0"), then those ten elements can make a whole 1001010100000010111110010000000000(binary) unique copies. It's almost like "fingerprinting" the bits of paper before gluing them to jars of brown spread.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  11. And yet.. by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    ... the ingredients list on all of them starts with sugar and vegetable oil.

    1. Re:And yet.. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      And the veg' oil is no doubt palm oil, the cheapest nastiest oil.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    2. Re:And yet.. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they're not talking about the "palm oil" that's left in your hands after a "workout session". Wink-wink, nudge-nudge.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:And yet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 million unique labels; it must have cost them billions

      An article appeared last year on the incredible expense of changing labels on food to reflect where that food comes from, specifically GMO food. A few added words, not unique per label:
      http://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/news_home/Regulatory_News/2016/02/GMO_labeling_alone_may_cost_Am.aspx?ID=%7BFFC3AC05-9A15-4D88-A6EB-26583DABAAD9%7D&cck=1

      "The one-time cost to American consumers associated with the Vermont G.M.O. labeling law could be as high as $3.8 billion, or $32 per household, according to a study funded by the Washington-based Corn Refiners Association."
      Frankly, I don't care if food is GMO or not. I'll probably still eat it. What I did care about is that I'm not permitted to know. Just in the nick of time, the Vermont labeling Law was gutted, and I was saved from concerning myself with such matters any longer:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Law_114-214

      Do I care that Nutella is either 57.6% or 57.1% Sugar? No. Do I care if the few, quite few (~12%), Hazelnuts are GMO? Not at all. I would find it quite amusing if they were. Palm Oil/Soybean Oil/North Sea Light Crude... none of them are really natural; all come out of similar looking and functioning Industrial Processes. Just as long as they don't add any Pink Slime.
      But that's the thing about Nutella. For decades it was touted as Healthy especially for Kids; certainly healthier than Sugar Frosted Flakes... that weigh in at roughly 33% Sugar. I don't care about most of that stuff. But others do. Those with Kids.

      Now about those who are collecting the Labels, as inadequately labeled as they are, that's fine. A harmless hobby. People also collected Beanie Babies. Harmless enough... as long as they didn't try to eat them.

  12. No no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These were 3D printed in a private space colony from asteroid mined AI. With graphene.

  13. Re:Nutella Washington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We had a black girl named Asthma, also true story. Why not just name your kid Gonorrhea or something?

  14. The algorithm knows people! by XB-70 · · Score: 1
    I notice that the algorithm appears to have completely covered over the brown colour of Nutella, so I 'interviewed' the algorithm: "Algorithm, why did you change the labels?"

    Algorithm: "Me smarter than people. Me know people don't like colour of shit. Me take shit colour off all labels."

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  15. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Mans Sky generated billions of planets with trillions of animals

    Each and every one of them was shit.

  16. But the problem is... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    ...they all have Nutella in them.

    1. Re:But the problem is... by freeze128 · · Score: 2

      The problem is twofold:

      1) The jars sold out in a month. That means that this information is at least a month old. Why would Nutella wait so long to publicize what they were doing?
      2) They say that the 7 million jars sold out in a month. What is their usual rate of sale? If it's 10 Million in a month, then this is a flop.

  17. Alternate headline by fibonacci8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Italian firm runs software that produces permutations of the original input." News at 11.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    1. Re:Alternate headline by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's not amazing that Italians could do that. it's amazing that they could do that when they weren't trying to do something completely different.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. in the 90s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I signed my fidonet posts with footers generated by an algorithm.
    (where mods allowed it)

  19. Not design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These randomly generated patterns are not designs, by definition.

    Design has principals and elements that are chosen specifically for a reason. They are carefully planned and revised in order to evoke an emotion, to guide the reader's eye with a hierarchy, etc...

    Not OMFG look how many different colors we can randomly mash together. Ohhh pretty!

    1. Re:Not design by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      These randomly generated patterns are not designs, by definition.

      Design has principals and elements that are chosen specifically for a reason. They are carefully planned and revised in order to evoke an emotion, to guide the reader's eye with a hierarchy, etc...

      Not OMFG look how many different colors we can randomly mash together. Ohhh pretty!

      Well it is design. The colours used, are not entirely random. If you look at the video they all blend well. Obviously the algorithm uses features from the colour wheel to ensure a pleasing look. Also, the patterns are a mix of patterns designed by humans to be pleasant and to coordinate well.

      There is design principals and elements at work. This isn't 100% random colours and isn't just random dots on a jar. This is picking coordinating colours and coordinating patterns to make pleasing arrangements.

      That is a design.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  20. I wish there was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    less sugar, and more nuts and chocolate in Nutella.

    1. Re:I wish there was by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't have a breakdown of ingredients to hand, but Cote d'Or used to do a black chocolate spread that was bordering on bitter.

      Might be hard finding outside the Francosphere though.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:I wish there was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the Google:

      http://www.epicurious.com/arch...

      You can, of course, also just mix nut butter, sugar, salt, and cocoa powder yourself.

  21. As unique as a serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just sayin'.

  22. Genuine one-of-a-kind US one dollar bill by davidwr · · Score: 1

    for sale.

    Authentic series 2013 United States Federal Reserve Note in good condition with serial number. Face value $1.00.

    Only $19.95 plus shipping.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Genuine one-of-a-kind US one dollar bill by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that notes with numerologically interesting serial numbers do get sold on auction sites for more than face value though.

      Quick google search confirms

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  23. This Sounds Retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like Trump voters.

  24. A beautiful artwork by mattr · · Score: 2

    t's pretty funny, depressing, expected ...what word to use? that many of the comments to date are "unimpressed". Hint: The article is lying when it says an algorithm replaced a designer.

    This is obviously a piece of digital media art created by a media artist who has both artistic sense and a level of programming expertise, or possibly as a collaboration between an artist and a programmer. Every single variation I saw in the video looked fun and enjoyable, which is not what you would expect to achieve unless you have both sense and ability in both technical and artistic areas.

    It is perhaps a different discussion if you want to ask is this art or commercial design, or can they be the same thing.

    As another poster mentioned, procedural graphics can be cool. But also how to produce a certain feeling from it? What was the entire creative process? Did the creator(s) have to explore a huge space of outputted images, like in a fractal explorer? Did weeding out of unsuitable images happen? Was there a lot of experimentation with the design rules and types of patterns? Did it all start with someone drawing the kind of images he or she desired and then try to imagine how to achieve different kinds of variations (one image shows a portion of a swatch being composited on top of the same pattern in a different color, another image shows curving borders that clearly separate three different patterns, another image is very different showing a vertical uneven pattern of stripes that looks more hand drawn.. but also likely has many variations). Were off-the-shelf design programs used for the initial input or pattern generation, or was it all custom? How was the color palette decided? What language was it written in and how many lines of code? What percentage of the project was programming, or was it a constant programming and drawing and tweaking kind of intense operation? And did people at Nutella go over all 7 million images to make sure it didn't generate something scary like a skull or words? ;)

    Collaborations between artists and programmers can be awesome and challenging. I've been in some where technical issues had to be resolved very quickly due to a fixed exhibition schedule. I remember an event 10 years ago. A famous media artist (Jeffrey Shaw) was giving a thank you speech when his work had won the top prize in a prestigious art museum's competition, which also meant it would go on permanent display. It was actually the work of a small team. He chose to emphasize before anything else that the programmer (Bernd Lintermann) he worked with in fact also had provided a great deal of creativity and was an artist in his own right. The work was for a CAVE environment (3 walls and floor were projectors) but the same can be true in many genres.

    FWIW that was 1997, though it was still exhibited years later. http://www.ntticc.or.jp/en/arc...

    Though I have not been following him, FYI that programmer's page is here: http://www.bernd-lintermann.de...
    ZKM is a famous digital art museum in Karlsruhe, Germany.
    He exhibited at the Nikola Tesla museum a couple of years ago.
    I mention these things just because if there are any people here with whom this resonates, you might enjoy exploring possibilities.

    I'd also be interested to hear more about the story and was it something developed in-house by Ogilvy creatives or someone from outside, in a small digital media studio. Perhaps one day that story about the people who actually created the digital art system will come to light.

  25. Re:mmm...Chocolate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to smear it on my sphynxster and force my wife to lick it off for her desert after eating my shit during our sex games. Nutella really keeps that bitch coming back for more!

    I HIGHLY recommend it.

    +1 Funny

  26. ok its clear,,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EditorDavid is worthless..'

    hey are you old enough to recognize a company called "DICE"??

    fucking fool

  27. Re:Nutella Washington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was this black girl in our high school that got pregnant and when she had her baby, she named it Nutella. True story.

    +1 Interesting

  28. Re:Nutella Washington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had a black girl like that. She named her baby Urina.

    +1 Informative

  29. Omg by easyTree · · Score: 1

    I'm rushing out to buy hazelnut flavoured sugar (really, check the ingredients) !

  30. i made an algorithm too by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    for (int i = 0; i < 7000001; i++)
    printf("Nutella %i\n", i);


    mine's better. 7 million and ONE unique labels

  31. Was done previously, and more elegantly by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 1

    In a similar publicity stunt in Israel, a local chocolate company did this for chocolate bar wrappings, with much more elegant designs (done in collaboration with HP). You can see some of the designs in this image search: https://www.google.com/search?...

    --
    - Tal Cohen
  32. Well... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Sweet! :-)

  33. Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope they tried to patent this. I'd really, really hate it if every item in the grocery stores starts being shipped with random packaging. You'll no longer be able to trivially recognize products by sight and would instead have to read the labels of everything.

  34. I wish they would learn to do this in games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are a game dev, with 100 million dollar + budget all your mobs fall into 10 categories of looks. You guys are all beat by a sandwich spread company.

  35. Re: mmm...Chocolate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald, we talked about this at length and had an agreement. We know that you can't keep any agreements, but can you at least try?

    Now we understand you have extreme difficulty following the simplest of instructions, but you were clearly directed stay on "the Twitter" god damnit!

    You're not welcome here.

    Also:

    1. Pics, or it never happened.
    2. GTFO, and go covfefe yourself!
    3. If we catch you doing this shit again, we are gonna take away your Twitter permanently, and then you'll be sorry.

  36. Probably a boatload of swastikas by skoskav · · Score: 1

    Gravatar early on seemed to generate plenty of swastikas. I hope at least one ends up rotated 45 degrees over, say, a white circle with a red background.

    1. Re:Probably a boatload of swastikas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nutella did nothing wrong.

  37. Nice, slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linking a site, which is on one of the ublock malware lists.

  38. Shiny beeds by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Some people will fall for anything.

  39. Palm, meet face. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Some of us make actual algorithmic art. Publicity stunts like this just make everything "algorithmic" look bad. See my homepage for the obligatory shameless plug.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  40. Not that unique? by Harald+Paulsen · · Score: 1

    From the video in the article (from their production facilities) it appears they are not really that unique. I saw a few duplicates:

    http://screenshot.co/#!/57e0e9...

    --
    Harald
  41. Another NSA Conspiracy by tmjva · · Score: 1

    This was all a set up to find more NSA leakers though print media like the little yellow dots.

    Apparently they think all leakers are a little bit nutty.

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  42. Shortly after... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the makers of Nutella filed an unprecedented 7 million court cases of copyright infringement for their newly created "artworks"

  43. Tits with nipples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The algorithm got a little dirty when designing my jar, managed two nearly perfect breasts with nipples.