Slashdot Mirror


Roomba Inventor Launches 'Tertill', a Weed-Killing Robot For Your Garden

mcpublic writes: iRobot veteran and Roomba co-inventor, Joe Jones is a modest man with a big mission: to create robots that make agriculture more efficient, less tedious, and yes, maybe even one day feed the world. After a decade at Harvest Automation building greenhouse robots, his new team at Franklin Robotics has developed Tertill, an affordable, waterproof, solar-powered robot that continuously whacks weeds around your yard. MIT Technology Review calls Tertill "a Roomba for your garden." Today the Kickstarter campaign went live and already they are well on the way to their goal. According to the Kickstarter campaign, Tertill is solar powered, chemical free, waterproof and Bluetooth compatible. It doesn't actually pull the weeds from your garden, instead it uses a "spinning string trimmer" to trim the weeds down to ground level. Since Tertill will be trimming weeds daily, the company says the weeds will eventually run out of nutrients to continue growing, and therefore will die and decompose. How does it know what's a weed and what's a plant? "A plant tall enough to touch the front of Tertill's shell activates a sensor that makes the robot turn away. A plant short enough to pass under Tertill's shell, though, activates a different sensor that turns on the weed cutter. Because Tertill's approach is height-based, put one of the provided plant collars around short plants until they are tall enough for Tertill to recognize. When Tertill approaches the collar, it will recognize it and turn away."

116 comments

  1. Sold! by mccalli · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at robot lawnmowers recently. They require a bit more fuss than standard indoor robot vacs in that you need to lay guide borders and have outdoor power going to them.

    That said, they're reasonably economical if viewed over a two year period vs a gardener. The downside is though - just mowing. So you're still left doing the weeding etc. yourself (or paying extra for a gardener).

    Next step - add me a feature that can detect dog dirt and deal with it too. I would pay a lot for an outdoor-does-it-all device.

    1. Re:Sold! by Togden · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would pay a lot for an outdoor-does-it-all device.

      I believe you can train a child/wife for this.

    2. Re:Sold! by mccalli · · Score: 2

      Taking your comment po-faced (which yeah, I shouldn't be doing...) actually, I have been asking my children to help out more in the garden right now. For straight mowing it's easy, for hedge trimming I do the hedges and they load into the bins.

      But weeding? Weeding is a bit more awkward and is rarely done by anybody with any great diligence. I also back on to a farmer's field, so I get a lot of stuff making its way over. Yeah - weeding for an inexpensive price I can see happening.

      As I say, only real trouble I can think of is dogs. I have three, and the garden needs an amount of diligence because of it.

      Last, but pretty major, concern would be grass. The video showa it working on dirt only, not on grass. It's saying the detection mechanism is 1 inch = weed - well, how about slightly overgrown grass? Would it sort that out or would it just spend its entire life trying to cut the grass? The video doesn't mention grass once, which does make me a bit suspicious.

    3. Re:Sold! by mccalli · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aah - and immediately I post, I find the answer in one of the Kickstarter FAQs:

      Will Tertill work on my lawn?
      Tertill is designed for home vegetable and flower gardens. Because it uses a hieght based approach, it is not suitable for use on grass.


      OK, sold status rescinded. I need something that would handle grass, and I suspect many more people would as well.

    4. Re:Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would pay a lot for an outdoor-does-it-all device.

      I believe you can train a child/wife for this.

      Fuck the training. That's what sudo is for.

    5. Re:Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would pay a lot for an outdoor-does-it-all device.

      I believe you can train a child/wife for this.

      You obviously never had a wife or child. Getting, training and keeping them is a lot harder and more expensive than a robotic device.

      Sadly, i doubt the robotic gardener will be successful. Not because it's a bad idea, but due to simple economics.

      It will be manufactured by whatever Chinese sweatshop gives him the lowest price and the resulting product will be low quality garbage. Not to mention the millions of their own cheap knock-offs they will sell. Robotic gardeners will get a bad reputation and quickly fade away as just another fad.

    6. Re:Sold! by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Heck. at least a robotic gardener. Yes, I know about FarmBot. It's still small-scale, and limited to a single "box" garden. Ideally, a small robotic device that would seed, feed, and weed multiple types of plants Pest control would be a nice add-on ability. For a first-flight device, this looks interesting. but the 9 square meter range would tend to limit its' usability for any serious gardening, be it for flowers or for food.

    7. Re:Sold! by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      Obviously you have neither!

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    8. Re:Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure what this is implying that it is not suitable for removing weeds from lawns, as there would be no distinction between weed and well tended grass due to the height approach. Grass in your garden would be correctly identified as a weed given that very issue.

    9. Re:Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aah - and immediately I post, I find the answer in one of the Kickstarter FAQs:

      Will Tertill work on my lawn?

        Tertill is designed for home vegetable and flower gardens. Because it uses a hieght based approach, it is not suitable for use on grass.

      You'll just have to use your hands for the time being.

      OK, sold status rescinded. I need something that would handle grass, and I suspect many more people would as well.

    10. Re:Sold! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      For a first-flight device, this looks interesting. but the 9 square meter range would tend to limit its' usability for any serious gardening, be it for flowers or for food.

      That doesn't quite cover the home acre...
      I'm also not sure how it deals with things like anthills, rabbit holes, sprinklers, toys, tree roots, newspapers and ponds. Do you have to lay down a fence around all of those?

    11. Re:Sold! by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Just based on how it works it'd be hard to se how it would work for lawn weeds even if it could recognize them. You can't just go to town on your dandelions with a line trimmer without tearing up the grass. I have found that if you get tired of spraying that 'stand up weeders' or 'grandpa's weeder' type tools work very well on dandelions and thistles.

    12. Re: Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're looking for something similar to BoniRob https://qz.com/553383/this-robot-kills-weeds-and-could-end-the-need-for-herbicides-on-farms/
      Albeit you'll want a more compact version.

    13. Re:Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your lazy-ass wife on the job.

      Mine always mows the lawn, but mostly because I tell her to fucking do so.

    14. Re:Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Getting, training and keeping them is a lot harder and more expensive than a robotic device."

      I thought losing the wife was the expensive step?

    15. Re:Sold! by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      I would pay a lot for an outdoor-does-it-all device.

      I believe you can be trained by a child/wife for this.

      FTFY.

    16. Re:Sold! by WhiteDragon · · Score: 2

      I would pay a lot for an outdoor-does-it-all device.

      I believe you can train a child/wife for this.

      My kids love to "help" in the garden. The biggest problem is they get overly enthusiatic, and pull up nice plants when weeding. As for the wife, I always say, she's not a farmer's wife, I'm a farmer's husband. She does the bulk of the planting, weeding, etc.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    17. Re:Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would pay a lot for an outdoor-does-it-all device.

      Try a Capra Aegagrus Hircus

    18. Re: Sold! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      An expensive robot sold at cost with replaceable herbicide canisters could use the razor blade business model. Maybe a cheap "walker" type robot with a dumbed-down imaging system could identify friend from foe and give it a little spot squirt of glyphosate. You could even sell premium "organic" approved canisters.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    19. Re:Sold! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Then you just need something to clean up after it and feed it all winter.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    20. Re: Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be manufactured by whatever Chinese sweatshop gives him the lowest price and the resulting product will be low quality garbage. Not to mention the millions of their own cheap knock-offs they will sell. Robotic gardeners will get a bad reputation and quickly fade away as just another fad.

      Which is exactly why no new consumer product has been made in decades. There was a similar idea of robotic vacuum years ago, but because they were made out of parts from cheap factories, no one ever bought one and the idea was quickly considered useless.

    21. Re: Sold! by dryeo · · Score: 1

      For a robot, high test vinegar would work well, just need multiple applications on established weeds.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    22. Re:Sold! by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      It depends on how you lose her........

    23. Re: Sold! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Monoculture lawns simply need to be discouraged. Over infestation with dandelions is poor ground cover, but grass with patches of clover and Holly and some dandelions is good ground cover and attractive. Huge zones of monoculture grass are death zones. It's people trying to extend the huge zone of life-absence that a 'clean' house represents to the outdoors.

      When people drenched the whole world around themselves with chemicals, they aren't doing themselves a favor.

    24. Re:Sold! by GrabbaTheButt · · Score: 1
      I had a robomower a number of years ago... honestly the greatest thing I ever bought. Did a fantastic job and totally automated a job I hated. My problem at the time was it broke down after a season. Luckily I had bought at Costco , so returned and got a new one... which was fantastic, then broke down after a season. That one was returned for a refund as Costco strangely enough stopped carrying them.

      At the time they were $1800 and for that price I didn't think that a major servicing was reasonable. I'm sure they have much improved in the last 10 years and someday I will definitely revisit. It really did do a stellar job and the set up with the control wire to fence it in really wasn't that much of a chore.

    25. Re: Sold! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's what I was thinking. It would also justify electronics in the refills because the machine would need to know to use a lot more of the "organic" chemical.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    26. Re: Sold! by budgenator · · Score: 2

      The way it usually works is the Farmer or Crop Production Services company sprays the field with glyphosate, which kills everything, especially the weeds. 2 weeks later the land is tilled, just enough to plant, then the field is planted. After about 2 weeks the crop had germinated, and they spray the field with a Pre-emergent herbicide so any weed seed that have not germinated are prevented from germinating; leaving the field almost weed free until after harvest.. Now little Suzie can eat without going into anaphylaxis due to being allergic to weeds in her food.

      Now for the heresy, weeds are usually good for a garden, their roots instinctively go deep, breaking through hard-pan that crop plants can't and they draw up minerals and moisture from deeper in the ground. Let them grow until just before they flower and cut them down and leave them residue on the ground as mulch.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    27. Re: Sold! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      weeds are usually good for a garden

      Well, not for an ornamental garden.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re: Sold! by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "For a robot, high test vinegar would work well,"

      Yep. I've been spraying vinegar on weeds in sidewalk cracks and similar places for a couple of years. Cheap, biodegradeable, easy to apply, doesn't usually kill in one application, so accidental overspray isn't a disaster.

      Would it work on weeds in a lawn without excessive collateral damage? I don't know, but it's probably worth trying.

      Or one can just adopt the anything_that_can_survive_occasionally_being_mowed_is_welcome_to_grow_here approach. It's not like lawns are useful for much of anything.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    29. Re: Sold! by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah I don't enforce a monoculture... I leave the clover and random grasses alone, but the dandelions will crowd out the other plants and then encourage erosion in my yard if I don't thin them out. So I've been pulling them lately instead of spraying, and it has worked very well. Your post does make me laugh a little to myself thinking about the pest control guys that come door to door, advising that I contract them because a neighbor had carpenter bees and I clearly have spiders. That the latter probably discourage the former in a way that doesn't involve intentionally covering my house in poison wouldn't make a good selling point.

    30. Re: Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "one can just adopt the anything_that_can_survive_occasionally_being_mowed_is_welcome_to_grow_here approach"

      Or as I call it, my 'ecologically green diverse ecosystem lawn'. :-)

    31. Re: Sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People please.'I will say this once. Please stop trying to kill weed. Instead put it in a bag and send it to me. I will even pay you for it.

      I am a weed smoking robot. Crowdfund me. /s

    32. Re: Sold! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Or one can just adopt the anything_that_can_survive_occasionally_being_mowed_is_welcome_to_grow_here approach. It's not like lawns are useful for much of anything.

      Hence why mine was covered in bark.
      Of course the prior half decade of severe drought allowed the bark to be broken down and replacement maintenance not done so now that it's rained *BOOM* I now am the weed factory for the hood.

      More bark on order, but apparently I'm not alone in this as they're backordered at the moment.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    33. Re:Sold! by dlingman · · Score: 1

      Mine (also from costco) is still going strong. Have needed to replace the battery packs, but any decent battery place can do that for you.

    34. Re:Sold! by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm in the UK and the prices vary enormously. I was thinking of this one, which is relatively cheap.

      However I also had a person come round from a robot mower specialist, Autolawn. They recommended one about double the price, and said the reason was reliability. That seems to tie in with what you're saying.

      In my case I'd also need to get outside power fitted, and in two lawns as well. The main problem for me though would be the dogs - the garden needs manual clearing, and a lot of it, which means all the nice scheduling and "mow at night" stuff just goes out of the window. A machine that could cope with dog dirt would be superb.

    35. Re: Sold! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Really? There's one particular weed that really lays in roots in a small ornamental garden I have on the side of my house, but the other two major species that do it are so shallow-rooted that a four-year-old would have no trouble pulling up a plant that comes to my knees.

  2. weed killing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But we're trying to grow the weed!

    1. Re: weed killing? by gerf · · Score: 1

      You kid, but some people grow milkweed because we got so good at killing it.

    2. Re:weed killing? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what my nephew asked me to post for him.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re: weed killing? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      not same kind of weed I presume...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    4. Re:weed killing? by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Because Tertill's approach is height-based, put one of the provided plant collars around short plants until they are tall enough for Tertill to recognize. When Tertill approaches the collar, it will recognize it and turn away.

      In the past, when weed and collar were used together, seizure was typically close behind.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  3. Should call it "Goomba" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Could give it a greasy italian accent too. "Ay-oH! weed ovah heee. Boom, i aint seen nothin"

  4. Needs a sensor inverter by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

    I have a yard that is nothing but weeds. I need a robot that treats anything taller than it as a weed.

    1. Re:Needs a sensor inverter by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Serious question: What is the best way to clear an overgrown garden? Especially if you have pets, which makes RoundUp problematic to use.

      Most people suggest pulling roots, but that is a lot of work.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Needs a sensor inverter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clear plastic sheet on top, in the summer sun will dehydrate and scorch everything underneath it.

    3. Re:Needs a sensor inverter by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      I've found the fastest way is to cut them at the roots then rake them up. I've used an action hoe to clear out more than one backyard that has overgrown weeds. It acts as a blade that goes just under the surface, you can then rake up the weeds (or however you collect seasonal leaves) and toss them. Since you are killing them at the root, they don't come back. Though whatever seeds are left *may* grow new weeds.

    4. Re:Needs a sensor inverter by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Not too worried about fast, but that certainly seems effective. I've been trying vinegar out too, it seems to work. I will cover it afterwards, no desire to plant anything else there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Needs a sensor inverter by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting idea. I could clear taller stuff with a strimmer and then cover it. In fact I could put RoundUp down and then cover it, transparent at first to make sure it is really dead and then eventually with another opaque layer and/or gravel.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Needs a sensor inverter by Lanforod · · Score: 1

      rototill it.

    7. Re:Needs a sensor inverter by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Really clearing? Tillers are pretty good at that once you've cut everything to the ground. Then you can do what AC suggests and tarp it to kill everything.

  5. Grass by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    Will I hafta put a collar around every blade of grass?

    1. Re:Grass by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      like any other weed, grass will be removed

  6. Good luck with stubborn things like Mares Tail by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

    that laugh at weedkillkers. That stuff can even dislodge concrete.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
  7. Runaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weren't the first robots to go crazy in Runaway agricultural bots?

  8. Saw this movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tom Selleck smashed it in the opening scene... oh and a cute blonde held one over her head.

    1. Re:Saw this movie... by Topwiz · · Score: 2

      Gene Simmons first appearance without makeup.

  9. Nice try. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My weed isn't in my garden, it's in my basement.

  10. An awful lot of assumptions by dabadab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as I can see this assumes that whatever you have planted is well-spaced, doesn't get bushy and weeds are well-behaved and don't grow too close to your vegetables. (In my actual garden none of these assumptions are true.)

    Also, there's the problem that it can maintain a garden up to 9(!) square meters.

    It looks a lot more like a science fair project than something actually usable.

    --
    Real life is overrated.
    1. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      I agree, you'd thing a Roomba co-inventor would have a larger budget than that device reflects.

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    2. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by Stoertebeker · · Score: 1

      +1
      some more unrealistic assumptions:
      -soil is firm and even enough to drive on and not cake wheels with dirt
      -plants never grow big enough to shade the paths the robot drives on
      -weeds are small but try to grow tall, there are no creeping vine type weeds.

      To meet the requirements of enough space for the thing to travel, and enough sunlight for it to power itself, you essentially need to use your real estate very inefficiently. Can only plant a fraction of the density you normally would.

    3. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by Ramze · · Score: 2

      Agreed. This is not an intelligent weed-picker. It doesn't even pick weeds, it merely cuts them and hopes they don't grow back taller than its threshold to detect them as a weed before the next cutting, and even then... it prays that the weed will simply die from lack of energy because its leaves and stalk keep getting snipped.

      It also has no concept of where it's going -- relying on a simple logic of move until you hit something tall enough to register as a plant or wall, then turn and move some more. The wheels are tiny and designed for dirt (though they are 4-wheel drive!). They don't look like they'd handle mounded rows well or even a mulched garden. They might even get confused with simple pine straw.

      $250 estimated for a solar-powered robot weed-eater that can only handle 100 sq ft and probably won't get the job done on its own. Hmm... I'll pass, thanks.

    4. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      The garden size can be larger, but the performance may degrade with larger gardens. And 9 square meters is pretty large. It's not for a lawn, but the flower garden in front or the vegetable garden in back.

    5. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      It sounds totally useless for gardens, but like it would be a cool device for clearing a nice flat walk of weeds growing up between the stones. That's a severely limited market, though. My walk is lumpy, for example.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So I backed the project, even with the potential issues. Here is my thinking in regards to our vegetable garden, which we mostly plant in rows

      I won't use it right after the garden is planted, there are too many small plants coming up, plus then it is spring, nice out outside and the garden is "new" so weeding isn't much of a chore.

      After several weeks(about mid June), many of the plants should be tall enough, it is getting hotter out, I'm getting sick of weeding, the dirt between the rows is getting somewhat packed from people walking on it, I'll unleash the robots.

      I don't expect it to replace all the weeding, but if it makes it so I can knock it off in 30-45 minutes or skip a week and not feel completely behind, then it might be worth it. I might just block it off into the areas with well established rows (potatoes, corn, onions, etc.) and big things like tomatoes, and forget all the vine-y stuff like beans and squash.

    7. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It looks a lot more like a science fair project than something actually usable.

      That depends on your garden. Sure in my garden the valuables are planted all over the place in a general mess, but there are a significant number of people who are now opting for the "vegetable patch" approach of a neat, organised and perfectly arranged garden to provide home farming. I look over the fence and see a garden that looks like a science fair project would be quite suitable for it.

      Except for the rosemary, that is growing out of control.

    8. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by bigwheel · · Score: 1

      +1 They must have already blown through many times their $120k goal. Two years of R&D can add up.

      I wonder if they are just using kickstarter as cheap advertisement for their target demographic.

    9. Re: An awful lot of assumptions by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I realize this isn't normal for many areas, but my vegetable garden is probably a bit more than 1.5 acres. That's a bit large for non-commercial, but it isn't the largest personal garden in my area. Imma need a bunch of them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And 9 square meters is pretty large.

      Actually, it isn't. That's a square with sides of 3m (about 3 yards), since 3mx3m=9m^2.
      You probably imagined 9 meter squared, which is 81 square meter (9x9 = 81), and which is what OP should have said in the first place.

    11. Re:An awful lot of assumptions by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nope. I was imagining 9 m^2, a square of ground 3m on each side, which corresponds to the 100 sq. ft. that TFA mentions. That's a "garden" size. Though "garden" outside the US corresponds to "lawn" or "yard" inside the US. So I think much of the confusion is on the definition of "garden" where it's a smaller patch of land within a larger yard/lawn, that holds flowers or vegetables, and no other live ground cover (as other plants compete). At least by the definition used by the maker of the device in question.

  11. Commercial version possible? by Bruinwar · · Score: 2

    In my tomato garden I use cheap landscape fabric with 6" or more of straw over it. This works well & the weeds that can get through I can pull while watering.

    Maybe an industrial version of this could help farmers with weeds like Pigweed. No more buying special seeds & spraying chemicals that the weeds will always develop immunity to. Interesting podcast from NPR's Planet Money: Pigweed Killer

    --
    SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
  12. Almost bought a Roomba but didn't due to telemetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be great to have these products to help out but can't do it after seeing the scary amount of telemetry it collected. Their privacy policy says - oh yes, you can not share with us, just don't use any of the advanced features (As in none). Nice.

  13. weed whackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are a dumb invention, all you're doing is spreading more dandelion seeds around. you need to capture that shit and rip the whole weed out by the root.

    1. Re:weed whackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The string trimmer is the grass along edges where your mower can't reach but you still want grass.

      Roundup is for the places your mower can't reach and you don't care if there is grass.

      2,4-D is for dandelions ;-)

    2. Re:weed whackers by jsrjsr · · Score: 1

      If you're cutting down the weeds before they are more than an inch high, the dandelions should not get a chance to go to blossom before getting chopped.

  14. Miss-spelled "LAWN" by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    What uses is this in a "Garden"? Kill plants by height? That is useful in one instance only....when you are growing grass.

    Also, I like dandelions, what good is a robot that kills those? Nope, wake me up when it identifies plants before killing them, then you have something I might care about.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:Miss-spelled "LAWN" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is for flowerbeds, not lawns. It lets taller plants, such as dandelions, live while it kills shorter plants, such as lawn grass. I guess the idea is that this is for gardeners who buy small plants from the nursery and want to prevent any plants from growing "spontaneously" from the soil.

  15. Want Roundup/WeedBeGone attachment. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    I dont want it to activate a trimmer and cut it. I want it to roll a wet rag on it sprayed with either a broad leaf weed killer or roundup. Dont spray. Right now it is height based, no vision sensor. So roundup is enough. Once it recognizes weeds from grass, it can use broad leaf weed killer that does not kill the grass.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Want Roundup/WeedBeGone attachment. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I dont want it to activate a trimmer and cut it. I want it to roll a wet rag on it sprayed with either a broad leaf weed killer or roundup. Dont spray. Right now it is height based, no vision sensor. So roundup is enough. Once it recognizes weeds from grass, it can use broad leaf weed killer that does not kill the grass.

      What advantage do you get from chemicals? It adds to both the cost and maintenance. It also is likely less healthy for both you and the nearly plants. Assuming it works reliably, cutting the plants daily would work effectively as it is depriving the weed of the photosynthesis it needs to survive. I see no advantage of chemicals over this assuming it works as claimed.

    2. Re:Want Roundup/WeedBeGone attachment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glyphosate is proven to work, this isn't. Furthermore, some plants can lose an inch or so regularly with no problems. For example, most grass, which is an obnoxious garden weed. Glyphosate kills grass no problem. It's also harmless. Since your agenda is clearly to hate on chemicals, you'll now rant a while about Montanto and site a disputed study that chemicals are bad, Mkay.

  16. Invention that fails to solve the problem? by macraig · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... if you've got enough open soil between your garden plants for this thing to wander, then you're gardening wrong! And if a weed appears right next to a desirable plant - which is all too frequent - what then? Also never mind that it's useless for a weed-filled grass lawn, apparently? What was wrong with mulch, which works fine when applied correctly?

    1. Re: Invention that fails to solve the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just like, your opinion, man. But seriously, open spaces in a large garden are very common. Between rows of corn or potatoes it is basically a requirement. You aren't gardening wrong if you have open space, you are just gardening differently from how YOU garden. Regardless, this product doesn't look very useful to me.

    2. Re: Invention that fails to solve the problem? by macraig · · Score: 1

      ... open spaces in a large garden are very common.

      They are only common in gardens maintained by people who understand nothing about soil, microclimate, water conservation... you know, everything that American gardeners were never taught and never learn. It's disgusting when even back yard gardeners - the target market of this device - are applying wasteful techniques pioneered in a distant age of ignorance and perpetuated by giant monoculture factory farms. You use English like a hippie, so I'd expect you to know better and not defend this ignorance.

    3. Re: Invention that fails to solve the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a movie quote, I'm not a hippie. I just happen to have a larger garden than you sanctimonious euro-trash or bi-coastal neo-liberals can afford on your sad, tired continent or in your overcrowded tech corridors. If I tried to use permaculture methods here (yeah, I am educated in them) I'd have no time to actually garden. So instead, I use a rototiller, a tractor, and occasionally even some chemicals. Gasp. Get off your fucking high horse.

    4. Re: Invention that fails to solve the problem? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I know about all that shit, but have plenty of other stuff to do. I mulch, I fertilize. I spot spray glyphosate. I plant non-native species. In troublesome areas, I plant annuals. My yard looks great, and I'm down to just a few hours a week of work. If you enjoy gardening, then by all means go for it - but don't get all sanctimonious when others see it as a chore.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  17. Crazed Liberal Holed Up In A Downtown Ball Field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was heard screaming for a priest before he let loose and shot five. Before this, a negro waiter had tried to calm him down, but some gook said his brains just snapped, and that's when they finally called the police.

  18. Kickstarter: ONLY BACKERS can post comments. by macraig · · Score: 1

    Isn't that just the Internet's perfect Echo Chamber of Things? No public criticism or questioning allowed.

    1. Re:Kickstarter: ONLY BACKERS can post comments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back something for a buck, then cancel your backing before it actually funds. Problem solved.

    2. Re:Kickstarter: ONLY BACKERS can post comments. by macraig · · Score: 1

      You find that solution acceptable? What happens when KickStarter plugs that little hole in the echo chamber? You think quite small and narrow when you solve problems, don't you?

    3. Re:Kickstarter: ONLY BACKERS can post comments. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      If kickstarter had some sort of mod tools, maybe it could be open. But as far as I can tell, there isn't much you can do to mod the comments on your project. That's a recipe for disaster if it's an open forum. A troll's paradise is an unmoderated forum.
       
      At the same time, the goal of kickstarter isn't to croudsource ideas. It's to croudsource money. The ideas and planning should be finalized far before you start a kickstarter, or you're setting yourself up for disaster. No reason to let people not interested in spending money on the product comment in that case. If a project isn't for you, either ignore it or start your own, better version, with blackjack and hookers.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  19. He Doesn't Know How Plants Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most weeds do not actually require sunlight to live. The roots of most plants have their own sustenance mechanisms that can leech minerals and nutrients from the soil to sustain the plant. This is why plants have roots. Duh.

    Weeds can launch shoots from the nutrients they gather from the soil. This is why your dogs can run your centipede grass down to dirt and it will still come back. Every winter my dogs trample the centipede to dust, and every spring it comes right back.

    The weeds may not bring up shoots where the Weedba trims them, but the weeds also will not run out of nutrients and die. They'll keep right on trying, and will definitely outlast your disposable, non-recyclable trinket that will break within a year and you'll throw away because it didn't really work anyway.

    1. Re:He Doesn't Know How Plants Work by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Most weeds do not actually require sunlight to live. The roots of most plants have their own sustenance mechanisms that can leech minerals and nutrients from the soil to sustain the plant. This is why plants have roots. Duh.

      Weeds can launch shoots from the nutrients they gather from the soil.

      Even if this was true, the goal of weeding a garden isn't as much to kill the weeds as much as to keep the weeds from overpowering the desired plants. If the weeds remain tiny, you've effectively reached that goal regardless of whether or not the weeds are dead. If this thing works at all, I see it more useful for a flower garden than an actual garden but honestly, by the looks of it, I would expect it to get stuck the first time it rains.

  20. Seems dubious by DrXym · · Score: 1
    I'm sure this weed killer thing could probably navigate around a lawn somehow with training, but identifying weeds and cutting them in a timely fashion in a device that is solar powered seems like a difficult proposition.

    I bet the amount of power required to mow, scan for weeds and recharge would not allow it to handle very large lawns. In addition, weed species are different in different climates and zones. Even grass is different in different climates and zones that affects the blades. Some grasses are even considered weeds when they sprout in a lawn with another kind of grass. And some people plant flowering bulbs like daffodils, tulips etc. in their lawns and don't want them annihilated as weeds. And edges of lawns need special attention, especially next to borders with flowers and plants. Then there are false positives from fallen leaves from other plants and trees. And of course if you leave this robot laying around somebody's going to steal it.

    So a collective hmmm is in order.

    On the plus side it reminds me of a crappy Tom Selleck movie called Runaway which imagined a future with robots that would pick caterpillars off of plants and mash them up. I'm sure appliance robots will eventually serve a purpose but we're not there quite yet.

  21. If you can plan your garden around this, it works by RobinH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like most successful automation, it works well if you can plan the activity to suit the tool. For instance, at home I just don't buy clothes that I can't wash in a washing machine, or dishes that I can't wash in a dishwasher. Once you're willing to make compromises, then automation offers some significant advantages. In this case, if you planned your vegetable garden around this, it could work well.

    Of course people don't want to compromise. I think a major reason that Roomba's are more of a toy is people aren't willing to take the step of changing their living area to work well with a robot vacuum.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  22. Which model? by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Roomba up to 700 & 800 series are dumb, just aimlessly wandering around until eventually covering the whole surface.
    There isn't much data to collect, and the device only transmit wirelessly using infrared (remote control, virtual walls) and some ZigBee-like (to remotely start the virtual walls, and by the bigger remote).
    In short: they aren't able to do any telemetry.

    The 900 series is the only one with a camera, that has a concept of its environment (it can map it and has a notion of its position) and has wifi connectivity.

    unless you have some really weird dwelling place, just get a 790 or 890 if you're concerned about telemetry.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Which model? by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Or just get a Neato.

      I've had an XV-11 for 6 years, and it's still an impressive piece of technology.

  23. Poop by Topwiz · · Score: 1

    How about making a Roomba that won't smear pet shit/puke all over the room.

    1. Re:Poop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bigot! Gay scat fans love poop smears!

    2. Re:Poop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wear diapers

  24. In soviet russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet russia weed kills robot

  25. LOTS of "collars" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh! Hafta put a collar on the pet gerbil, hamster, rat, kitten or Chihuahua??? I can see the manic robot chasing any and all over the place till the battery runs out or the critter is dead of fright. I think I'll pass.

  26. OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so, I can program to rid my neighborhood of n!ggers, sp!cs, dots, and muzz!es.

  27. Re:If you can plan your garden around this, it wor by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Like most successful automation, it works well if you can plan the activity to suit the tool. For instance, at home I just don't buy clothes that I can't wash in a washing machine, or dishes that I can't wash in a dishwasher. Once you're willing to make compromises, then automation offers some significant advantages. In this case, if you planned your vegetable garden around this, it could work well.

    Of course people don't want to compromise. I think a major reason that Roomba's are more of a toy is people aren't willing to take the step of changing their living area to work well with a robot vacuum.

    Buy a Neato. It maps the room with lidar and cleans it properly. No need to redo the house for the vacuum.

  28. nature already has one of these by jakethesnake · · Score: 1

    Its called a chicken. Get some for your garden.See: https://oldworldgardenfarms.com/2013/08/20/why-a-great-garden-and-raising-chickens-go-hand-in-hand/

    1. Re:nature already has one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience is that the chickens eat everything including my newly planted veggies. Note that the article you cited said "... In the early spring and again in the late summer and fall – we turn our little flock of chickens loose in the garden to scratch, claw and roam about. ..." Well, yeah, once I have nothing of important growing in the garden they can go out to tear up the place. Not during growing season.

  29. No smarts by trevc · · Score: 1

    He's obviously not a very good inventor if this is the best he could come up with. This is why we bought a Neato instead of an Irobot - much more intelligence. Besides, gardening is good for the soul.

  30. Re:If you can plan your garden around this, it wor by RobinH · · Score: 1

    If you look at all the comments on RobotShop.com about the Neato robots, you'll see a lot of 5-star comments that say things like, "it gets stuck every so often," or "it seems to climb the sloped leg of my table" or "I really love this robot, but of course you still need to vacuum with an upright once a week." Heck I only vacuum once a week with an upright even now, so if I have to go chasing a robot vacuum around every couple days then it's definitely not saving me time, though perhaps it keeps the place a bit cleaner in the in-between days. I'm happy with how clean the house is now, but I want to spend less time vacuuming.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  31. Weed-Only Memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have waited 30 years to post this.

    JB

  32. Plant height = no sale by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Funny

    WTF... No hyperspectral sensors /w fancy ANN fueled expert trained CV?

    We want a sentient weed terminators on wheels that works anywhere even if it requires wireless streaming to a desktop computer running fancy CUDA code to figure out what to "delete".

    This product is a crop out.

  33. re: changing the enviironment to work with it ... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it's all about how much compromise is necessary.

    It's really not difficult to choose clothing options that are machine washable, 99% of the time. When you get into formal-wear, that changes -- but that's usually where people are willing to live with the disadvantages of having to take that tux or suit to the dry cleaners.... They're not going to wear it every day.

    Dishwasher-safe dishes? Again, not too tough to do that. I think I could safely say I'd accidentally have 90% dishwasher safe dishes if I just bought what I wanted without checking it first.

    I owned 2 different Roombas at my old house, and it was a pretty optimal environment for them. (All hard-wood floors and vinyl flooring. Single story ranch type layout. Not even much furniture it could go under, since my coffee table and living room couch and loveseat sat flat on the floor. No pets.) Both units died in under a year and were always needing manual assistance. The dust bins are too small so they can fill up long before a whole cleaning job is finished. Batteries wear out and stop holding a good charge. The spinning brush that gets along the baseboards breaks apart and needs occasional replacement. Hair or lint always winds around gears and rollers inside and causes jams and other malfunctions. IR electric eye failed on one of them. Just not worth the hassle at all, vs. pulling out the Dyson vacuum and taking care of things by hand.

  34. Re: changing the enviironment to work with it ... by RobinH · · Score: 1

    In these cases (clothes and dishes) the manufacturers of such items have mostly made things that are compatible with those devices. On the other hand, we haven't reached a point where any furniture manufacturers are making things that are marketed as "robot vacuum compatible". Plus, if you have to buy a $500 robot vacuum every year or two, that money can get me a long way towards a weekly cleaning service that's going to do a lot more thorough job, especially in some places in the US where inexpensive (and often illegal immigrant) labor is available for such jobs.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  35. Glyphosate, the biosphere killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broad-spectrum herbicides like Roundup are a major contributory factor to the ongoing collapse of the biosphere and the most rapid extinction of species that this planet has ever witnessed. Whether mankind will survive the collapse or vanish along with all the species upon which we depend is an open question, but what is not in any doubt is that billions will die when the world's food crops fail..

    But what do you care, safely wrapped in your "capitalism can do no wrong" bubble of ignorance and denialism.

    1. Re: Glyphosate, the biosphere killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the loony.

  36. Flamewar by DrYak · · Score: 1

    ...and let the whole "random wandering" vs. "navitagion" in vacuuming bots begin !

    (for those who were bored of vi vs. emacs (vs. nano vs. ed) )

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]