They keep saying this and it really doesn't make sense. Tesla clearly have the best self drive technology on the consumer market, once you're the best you can stop selling it further, thats something everyone else wants to do. I think it far more likely that tesla keeps telling people its not a complete solution, they try it and say they dissagree.
1-3m accuracy isn't actually better than the EU's Galileo constellation which will be fully functional in the next 2 years. The recievers for that are already in flagship android models, and by the time its fully functional (~2020) most phones will have it. Galileo is accurate to 1m and if you pay for it, 1cm.
The idea that you will go out and be violent because you've seen, and been involved in violence in games is a flawed abstraction of the idea that you repeat what you are exposed to.
When people are exposed to violence, real or in games, the constant practiced activity between both situations is that it demands of them to observe the situation and then learn to change how they make decisions for a better outcome for themselves. They can either enforce their decisions on the others present, or find a solution that doesn't require that. When you are exposed to real violence, often there is no way to get a positive outcome for yourself without enforcing your decisions on others, this unfortunately when practiced becomes habit and leads to more violence. Video games have a fixed rule system, you cannot enforce any kind of logic of your own unless you cheat, and certainly not on other, real people who can argue back, so this negative re-enforcement cannot happen. Video games while in use, prevent the player from practicing learned behaviors that lead to violence.
Isn't this precisely what you would expect when the information gathered to make the decision isn't influential enough on the outcome. It says they have 137 variables, which were as useful as 2. It suggests that the additional variables are either unrelated to the outcome, or are strongly related to the 2 suggested such that either way they provide no additional accuracy.
Does this work because your acceleration is now modelled using the central difference method. This would mean that your acceleration model is no longer subject to first order truncation errors which could be significant if you are actually trying to pick the best speed at any given time by reacting to traffic in your lane.
It probably was, at one point, like another user said, menial data entry. I get the impression though, that women were very involved in the process of developing better tools to make it easier, and I can believe that men displaced them as it became less menial. I think though to assume this happened by men simply jumping into the profession like outsiders performing an ambush is probably misinformed at best. Much more likely, the increased automation made it attractive to other fields, meaning other already male dominated professions integrated and as they were already trained in the adjoined male dominated field (for example aerospace engineering), the women lost out.
I also dislike this wording on previously common practices that we now look down upon. It was not just a commonly held belief that women would leave jobs as soon as they were married, it was more accurately a highly probable outcome at that time. The truth is that now these things don't happen because of changes to social expectations, back then they did happen and it was a problem for businesses. People weren't ignorant idiots in the 60's, they were equally as astute but the social conventions and level of knowledge were different.
The lack of retraining is, in my opinion, a major cause of the populist uprising in recent years. In the UK, the majority of areas where people voted for brexit were manufacturing centres until our economy shifted into services, the manufacturing declined leaving massive pockets of vocational workers without any skills that are in demand. These people are also the least likely to move away from their area for work for social and economic reasons, and this is in the middle of massive immigration (which provides workers who do go to demand). They blamed the government, and it was the government, just not the one they blamed.
As I understand it, in almost all western countries, post industrialization, population grows at diminishing rates until it falls. While China and India are behind Europe and North America, they are predicted to follow the same trend, and ultimately stabilize global population.
I couldn't find a text article about this, but I see it on this youtube video.
Kurzgesagt - Overpopulation
I grew up in the 90s and I use optical audio, mainly because my dad uses optical audio. I don't know of any other person who uses it or has used it. I find it hard to believe it was "nearly ubiquitous" for 10-20 years, I think it was little known then, and remains so now. I also think it unlikely that because cheaper devices don't have it now because it is "going away" like consumer trends are some mystical power. Its a more expensive alternative to conventional audio connections, and most people, particularly low end users will not ever want this. It makes sense for it to only be on the "bigger" but more relevantly expensive tv sets, it provides a high quality audio connection with very low interference at a higher price. I don't remember ever seeing it on cheaper tvs.
Gravity means that a physical system can both exist and have net zero energy at the same time. The energy consumed by generating mass follows a linear trend, but reduces the overall energy of the system by higher order. Consequentially you can either have nothing or a minimum viable amount, but not something in the middle. Additionally, a system which exists has less entropy for each additional particle, so it is also entropically feasible for it to spontaneously occur.
I have a 7" phablet. It has a 5AH battery, it lasts about 36 Hrs with normal use and about 18Hrs with heavy use and it was nowhere near as expensive as similar power phones because no one wants one. I personally cant understand it, I'm of average size (5ft 10) and I find its far better than the average phone in almost every single way.
Flying cars are much like fusion reactors. To anyone who understands what it is, the benefits are obvious and its easy to get excited about them. But there are some very serious issues which make them pretty absurd without decades of development. The biggest difference between the two is that we have already done decades of development on fusion reactors and we still can't use one to provide consumer electricity.
Too many kids are taught subjects but not how to learn. Kids should be taught how to deconstruct skills and knowledge, and how to test their own knowledge to give them confidence in what they have taught them selves. This would enable kids to pick up absolutely any programming language faster, as well as so many other skills.
After that, I think we should introduce kids to at least one main stream programming language at the time of their education. I think most people don't get into coding just because of this initial, quite high hurdle, even though it takes only a few hours to learn.
I've used a few peices of software that read the blank space on a drive and re-establish everything remotely file like back into the files it was before it was deleted. Surely for a developer this is an obvious solution.
If this is true, this suggests these people are regularly running low on will power, which then goes on to fail and they become addicted. This builds on the existing addiction model that suggests it happens to people rather than by them, caused by other problems in their lives.
I know its not the same, but they are part of the same family of chemicals, this should really have been investigated before they were approved for wider use.
If it were truly random, surely it would pass the tests at random, and so really we should be checking that it passes different tests each time, except on occasion when it doesn't.
Slashdot Mirror
Surely tesla just need to improve the AI to detect when its being flagged to pull over by police and comply.
They keep saying this and it really doesn't make sense. Tesla clearly have the best self drive technology on the consumer market, once you're the best you can stop selling it further, thats something everyone else wants to do. I think it far more likely that tesla keeps telling people its not a complete solution, they try it and say they dissagree.
1-3m accuracy isn't actually better than the EU's Galileo constellation which will be fully functional in the next 2 years. The recievers for that are already in flagship android models, and by the time its fully functional (~2020) most phones will have it. Galileo is accurate to 1m and if you pay for it, 1cm.
Finally my master plan to destroy all of time will be realised!
The idea that you will go out and be violent because you've seen, and been involved in violence in games is a flawed abstraction of the idea that you repeat what you are exposed to.
When people are exposed to violence, real or in games, the constant practiced activity between both situations is that it demands of them to observe the situation and then learn to change how they make decisions for a better outcome for themselves. They can either enforce their decisions on the others present, or find a solution that doesn't require that. When you are exposed to real violence, often there is no way to get a positive outcome for yourself without enforcing your decisions on others, this unfortunately when practiced becomes habit and leads to more violence. Video games have a fixed rule system, you cannot enforce any kind of logic of your own unless you cheat, and certainly not on other, real people who can argue back, so this negative re-enforcement cannot happen. Video games while in use, prevent the player from practicing learned behaviors that lead to violence.
Isn't this precisely what you would expect when the information gathered to make the decision isn't influential enough on the outcome. It says they have 137 variables, which were as useful as 2. It suggests that the additional variables are either unrelated to the outcome, or are strongly related to the 2 suggested such that either way they provide no additional accuracy.
Most of the "facts" you have quoted for this product are demonstrably false.
The tiles are stronger than conventional roofing materials and even if they aren't, they have a warranty to guarantee you aren't affected by this.
According to steveha's link the tiles are lighter and cheaper than conventional roofing materials
So, basically what you are saying here is that you spread false information for someone who stands to loose out.
Does this work because your acceleration is now modelled using the central difference method. This would mean that your acceleration model is no longer subject to first order truncation errors which could be significant if you are actually trying to pick the best speed at any given time by reacting to traffic in your lane.
It probably was, at one point, like another user said, menial data entry. I get the impression though, that women were very involved in the process of developing better tools to make it easier, and I can believe that men displaced them as it became less menial. I think though to assume this happened by men simply jumping into the profession like outsiders performing an ambush is probably misinformed at best. Much more likely, the increased automation made it attractive to other fields, meaning other already male dominated professions integrated and as they were already trained in the adjoined male dominated field (for example aerospace engineering), the women lost out.
I also dislike this wording on previously common practices that we now look down upon. It was not just a commonly held belief that women would leave jobs as soon as they were married, it was more accurately a highly probable outcome at that time. The truth is that now these things don't happen because of changes to social expectations, back then they did happen and it was a problem for businesses. People weren't ignorant idiots in the 60's, they were equally as astute but the social conventions and level of knowledge were different.
The lack of retraining is, in my opinion, a major cause of the populist uprising in recent years. In the UK, the majority of areas where people voted for brexit were manufacturing centres until our economy shifted into services, the manufacturing declined leaving massive pockets of vocational workers without any skills that are in demand. These people are also the least likely to move away from their area for work for social and economic reasons, and this is in the middle of massive immigration (which provides workers who do go to demand). They blamed the government, and it was the government, just not the one they blamed.
As I understand it, in almost all western countries, post industrialization, population grows at diminishing rates until it falls. While China and India are behind Europe and North America, they are predicted to follow the same trend, and ultimately stabilize global population. I couldn't find a text article about this, but I see it on this youtube video. Kurzgesagt - Overpopulation
Does anyone else think it is silly that something made in factories is called a "raw material"?
Its raw within the context of the process.
I grew up in the 90s and I use optical audio, mainly because my dad uses optical audio. I don't know of any other person who uses it or has used it. I find it hard to believe it was "nearly ubiquitous" for 10-20 years, I think it was little known then, and remains so now. I also think it unlikely that because cheaper devices don't have it now because it is "going away" like consumer trends are some mystical power. Its a more expensive alternative to conventional audio connections, and most people, particularly low end users will not ever want this. It makes sense for it to only be on the "bigger" but more relevantly expensive tv sets, it provides a high quality audio connection with very low interference at a higher price. I don't remember ever seeing it on cheaper tvs.
Gravity means that a physical system can both exist and have net zero energy at the same time. The energy consumed by generating mass follows a linear trend, but reduces the overall energy of the system by higher order. Consequentially you can either have nothing or a minimum viable amount, but not something in the middle. Additionally, a system which exists has less entropy for each additional particle, so it is also entropically feasible for it to spontaneously occur.
I have a 7" phablet. It has a 5AH battery, it lasts about 36 Hrs with normal use and about 18Hrs with heavy use and it was nowhere near as expensive as similar power phones because no one wants one. I personally cant understand it, I'm of average size (5ft 10) and I find its far better than the average phone in almost every single way.
should click-bait headlines like this be on slashdot?
This would have been a really good explanation for why mutants are only being noticed in the modern era in x-men.
Flying cars are much like fusion reactors. To anyone who understands what it is, the benefits are obvious and its easy to get excited about them. But there are some very serious issues which make them pretty absurd without decades of development. The biggest difference between the two is that we have already done decades of development on fusion reactors and we still can't use one to provide consumer electricity.
The plan was to build miles and miles of conveyor belts.
You mean like in factorio
Too many kids are taught subjects but not how to learn. Kids should be taught how to deconstruct skills and knowledge, and how to test their own knowledge to give them confidence in what they have taught them selves. This would enable kids to pick up absolutely any programming language faster, as well as so many other skills.
After that, I think we should introduce kids to at least one main stream programming language at the time of their education. I think most people don't get into coding just because of this initial, quite high hurdle, even though it takes only a few hours to learn.
I've used a few peices of software that read the blank space on a drive and re-establish everything remotely file like back into the files it was before it was deleted. Surely for a developer this is an obvious solution.
Studies have shown that will power appears to be a limited resource, and may potentially be topped up by sugar consumption.
https://en.wikipedia.org
If this is true, this suggests these people are regularly running low on will power, which then goes on to fail and they become addicted. This builds on the existing addiction model that suggests it happens to people rather than by them, caused by other problems in their lives.
http://kurzgesagt.org
Op doesn't understand the meaning of ++
Nicotine has been shown to have a similar effect on mammals.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
I know its not the same, but they are part of the same family of chemicals, this should really have been investigated before they were approved for wider use.
If it were truly random, surely it would pass the tests at random, and so really we should be checking that it passes different tests each time, except on occasion when it doesn't.