Slashdot Mirror


Trump Orders Government To Stop Work On Y2K Bug, 17 Years Later (bloomberg.com)

The federal government will finally stop preparing for the Y2K bug, seventeen years after it came and went. Yes, you read that right. Bloomberg reports: The Trump administration announced Thursday that it would eliminate dozens of paperwork requirements for federal agencies, including an obscure rule that requires them to continue providing updates on their preparedness for a bug that afflicted some computers at the turn of the century. As another example, the Pentagon will be freed from a requirement that it file a report every time a small business vendor is paid, a task that consumed some 1,200 man-hours every year. Seven of the more than 50 paperwork requirements the White House eliminated on Thursday dealt with the Y2K bug, according to a memo OMB released. Officials at the agency estimate the changes could save tens of thousands of man-hours across the federal government. The agency didn't provide an estimate of how much time is currently spent on Y2K paperwork, but Linda Springer, an OMB senior adviser, acknowledged that it isn't a lot since those requirements are already often ignored in practice.

15 of 460 comments (clear)

  1. 1200 man hours you say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As another example, the Pentagon will be freed from a requirement that it file a report every time a small business vendor is paid, a task that consumed some 1,200 man-hours every year.

    So they layed off one guy...whoopdedoo! Looks at those savings! Who wants a paper-trail of who the pentagon pays money too anyway?? What a zany idea.

  2. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't trust Trump to make smart cuts. He's not a details and logic guy, and he or his minions favor "trickle down" solutions over those that benefit the little guy directly. He might accidentally get a few right, but so would blindfolded dart throwers.

  3. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The issue isn't that this is bad per-se. It's that it's not very good. As the article points out, no one was really applying these regulations. Ultimately, this is grand standing more than anything else.

    I'm always happy to see redundant legislation go away, but don't get grand delusions that this is Trump somehow removing burdens and making the government magically super efficient.

  4. Re: What about the Y2K38 bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's on the desktop, of course. Amongst the serious computers Linux has, what, maybe 50% of the market share?

    I suppose Android's been fixed.

  5. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By "gamed the system", you mean "followed the system in place for 200+ years", right? And, according to your losing candidate, questioning this system is âoehorrifyingâ and "talking down our democracy" as recently as 2 weeks before the election?

            Got any other deep thoughts to share?

  6. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by I75BJC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is evident that you don't understand how the Governments work. Unneeded/unenforced are traps for people/organizations that are targeted. An unused or little known regulation can wreck havoc with "out of favor" people and organizations. Laws that aren't enforced should be removed so that people/organizations can live and work in a functional manner.

  7. Re: Leftists will bash Trump for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not hard to see how someone thinks if they have no filter

  8. at the turn of the century by pahles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Luckily the century turned a year later...

    --
    Sig?
  9. Didn't even have to RTFA by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to get the main point:

    " the Pentagon will be freed from a requirement that it file a report every time a small business vendor is paid"

    I foresee a _lot_ of 'small business vendors" cropping up over the years now.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  10. Re: What about the Y2K38 bug? by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose Android's been fixed.

    Yes, but a super majority of users won't be able to get the patch.

  11. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by Kiuas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    get rid of the Electoral college and a few big cities run the nation

    No they won't. Get rid of the electoral college and everyone gets an equal say in who rules. The fact that more people live in place A than place B does not mean that the people in place B should be given more power in a democracy,

    ensuring a broad nationwide support for the President, not just a few High population centers.

    Please explain to me how having less than a third of the populace support the president translates to 'a broad, nationwide support'?

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  12. Re: What about the Y2K38 bug? by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so I I'm not buying insurmountable technical justifications other than simple lack of will.

    It boils down to the fact that correctly handling time is complicated. Leap years, seconds, gregorian nonsense, .. the rules just pile up higher and higher. Nobody wants to touch that code and I dont blame them.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  13. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by mrsam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not an american but you guys should seriously consider getting rid of the electoral college.

    The electoral college is working as designed. If one were to ignore the votes in New York City and Los Angeles -- not even the states of New York and California, but just the two most populous cities across the fruited plain -- Trump wins by half a million votes.

    The electoral college is an ingenious solution to the problem of small clusters of populations imposing their will on an entire nation.

  14. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by davide+marney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But the EC is NOT a deliberative body. It is an honorary one. There's the source of your misunderstanding, I think.

    The members of the EC are picked by the winners. Membership is temporary, the entire EC is dissolved once the election results have been reported to Congress. In fact, the ACTUAL vote to confirm the election is done by Congress, not by the EC. And yes, it is an actual show-of-hands vote. The job of the EC is to simply report the official results of each state.

    That is why any electors who don't report properly are called "faithless" electors. They literally make a promise to faithfully report the results when they are appointed.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
  15. Re:Leftists will bash Trump for this by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    get rid of the Electoral college and a few big cities run the nation

    No they won't. Get rid of the electoral college and everyone gets an equal say in who rules.

    Campaigning would only occur in major cities, so they would have a much larger impact than now.

    The fact that more people live in place A than place B does not mean that the people in place B should be given more power in a democracy,

    It's called federalism, and it was put in place for a reason. The founding fathers realized that even though we are one country, we are composed of several different cultures with different values. A law that might make sense in a metropolitan area might not make sense in a rural area, so you don't want the population centers making all the rules for everyone else.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.