Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Says It Won't Replace Whole Foods Cashiers With Computers... Yet (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Amazon said it has no current plans to automate the jobs of cashiers in Whole Foods stores after it finishes acquiring the grocery chain. It also isn't planning any layoffs, according to a spokesperson. There is some speculation, however, that Amazon may change its plans and use new technology inside of Whole Foods locations. Commenting on Amazon's announcement from earlier today, LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner said, "Only one company on earth can buy grocery chain, be rumored to buy enterprise software company & in both cases be lauded for strategic vision."

109 comments

  1. Yeah sure they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every company that ever bought out another company always starts out with saying "Oh no worries we aren't going to change anything or lay anybody off!" and then six months or so later they do precisely that.

    Whole Foods may be pricey (which is why I only buy a few things there I can't find anywhere else; who does all their shopping in one store?), but Amazon will be making a mistake if they turn it into Just Another Grocery Store. There are aspects to Whole Foods that distinguishes it from other grocery stores and if you take those things away then it just fades into the background noise.

    1. Re:Yeah sure they won't by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What kind of insane PE ratio did they pay for 'Whole Paycheck'?

      Their 'chump list' is worth a fortune, but still?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Yeah sure they won't by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Yes, "stuff that others don't have" like old world coffee is why I go to Whole Foods, Fresh Market and similar stores.

      For regular groceries, they are much worse than regular supermarkets, both for price and quality. Staples like bread, milk and produce tends to be truly old compared to bigger stores with faster churn. And their meat and fish departments are staffed with people who have no idea what they're doing, and couldn't butcher a carcass or filet a fish without cutting bones if their life depended on it.
      So specialties, and mostly imports, is where it's at.

    3. Re:Yeah sure they won't by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      What kind of insane PE ratio did they pay for 'Whole Paycheck'?

      When I saw the headline that Amazon spent $13.4 billion on Whole Foods, I just assumed that they bought a large guacamole, two fruit cups and a dozen eggs.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Yeah sure they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of insane PE ratio did they pay for 'Whole Paycheck'?

      When I saw the headline that Amazon spent $13.4 billion on Whole Foods, I just assumed that they bought a large guacamole, two fruit cups and a dozen eggs.

      +1 funny, don't have mod points, thanks for making my day

    5. Re:Yeah sure they won't by acrimonious+howard · · Score: 5, Funny
      Don't believe mainstream media! A reliable source told me what really happened:

      Bezos: Alexa, buy me olives from Whole Foods.
      Alexa: Sure, buying all of Whole Foods.
      Bezos: Shit.

    6. Re:Yeah sure they won't by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      It just points out what we right wingers have been saying for ages: institutional left wingers are nothing but elitists.

    7. Re:Yeah sure they won't by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It just points out what we right wingers have been saying for ages: institutional left wingers are nothing but elitists.

      You're saying that as if it were a bad thing?

    8. Re:Yeah sure they won't by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      If you believe in an egalitarian world where equality of opportunity matters, yes it is.

  2. LinkedIn CEO needs English lessons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Only one company on earth can buy grocery chain, be rumored to buy enterprise software company & in both cases be lauded for strategic vision."

    OK.

    1. Re:LinkedIn CEO needs English lessons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be worse. When my cousins speak, I have to go to urbandictionary.com to translate everything

  3. Why not? by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With a 15$/hour minimum wage, they will probably change their minds.

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  4. Personal Service counts a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Amazon might like to learn that.
    But they won't. All they want to do is to put every other retailer out of business (like Wallyworld did once).
    I prefer to shop locally these days.

  5. What's the purpose of this acquistion? by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 2

    Whole Foods is all hippy-dippy Earth loving stuff I thought. What would Amazon want with that? It's like Walmart buying out an Amish quilter and saying they have no plans for a factory. No duh! They can't go high-tech, it would defeat the purpose of why it was successful in the first place.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    1. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      'Whole Foods' knows who the people dumb enough to shop at 'Whole Foods' are!

      Think about that for a second. There's only one explanation: Amazon is going into the Cherokee Hair Tampon business.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure, but maybe the purpose is to sell shit at inflated prices to hippy-dippy Earth loving folks. I know, I know, why not sell shit at inflated prices to right-wing gun nuts instead, it's unjust!

    3. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brick and Mortar retail space.

      Whole Foods is "earthy crunchy hippie dippy" in the way that Apple is "personal computer". The kids with their iPhones and Air Buds are going to be more than happy to walk in, shop, and walk out without ever needing to interact with staff.

    4. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the people that shop at Whole Foods have money and will pay more for items from there than a similar item at, say, Walmart. Same reason people make apps for Apple first...the people who use Apple products have money.

    5. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have an awesome beer selection...at least at the location by me.

    6. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Whole Foods is the corporate version of the Republican party. They refuse to give cash to their employees to buy health insurance. Also, they work their employees to death. That is why Bezos loves them with all of his heart. He wants workers to die. Amazon kills.

      This merger that is made in hell will make Wall Street so happy, because Wall Street hates normal people.

    7. Re: What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And thousands will die because of this.

    8. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When's the last time you've been in a whole foods?

      If that's what "working to death" looks like, then my job might as well be a north korean labor camp.

    9. Re: What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to sell life insurance companies short since after Bezos becomes their ruler, many people are going to die.

    10. Re: What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would have probably died from heroin overdoses anyway.

    11. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by godrik · · Score: 1

      Who knows, but it makes sense. Amazon has been interested in having brick and mortar stores for a while. And they are also interested in grocery delivery.
      I see two angles:
      -use the Whole Foods network to serve as relay point for their regular deliveries
      -add a food delivery department to Whole Foods

    12. Re: What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whole Foods has 91,000 slaves. Bezos will have great fin gleefully destroying their lives. Welcome to 80+ hour work weeks and no vacation time.

    13. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I know, why not sell shit at inflated prices to right-wing gun nuts instead, it's unjust!

      Right Wing gun nuts shop at Wal-Mart, and don't have the kind of disposable income that those that shop at WF have...

    14. Re: What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The death of all thinking people is their ultimate goal.

    15. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      had...until they went to WF.

      What matters is the money you keep. Shopping at whole foods is like buying $350 pre distressed bluegenes. Sure some people do it because they don't care about $350, the other 99% are trying desperately to be mistaken for those that don't care about $350.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whole Foods is all hippy-dippy Earth loving stuff I thought. What would Amazon want with that? It's like Walmart buying out an Amish quilter and saying they have no plans for a factory. No duh! They can't go high-tech, it would defeat the purpose of why it was successful in the first place.

      Brick and Mortar locations with decent brand recognition (and, among their target customers it's a well liked brand) in high-income areas with a lot of cross-over with their existing customer base (You think hippy-dippy upper-middle class buyers don't also use Amazon?) They can also use these locations and their existing back-end to expand their grocery delivery business and get real experience in retail.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    17. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Whole foods has a pretty incredible IT department, they have oodles of data back to at least the late 90s on every customer, purchase, and analysis of purchasing habits etc etc. They're a very big customer of Oracle's. It's hard if not impossible to buy that kind of dataset, and if you intend to move in to, own and dominate brick and mortar retail, you need decades of consumer data from many regions. Also they get access to a massive distribution network and long standing vendor relationships. Total slam dunk.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    18. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Like I said upthread: The chump list...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whole Foods is all hippy-dippy Earth loving stuff I thought.

      It thought that was Trader Joe's. "Whole Paycheck" is for snobs and hipsters who think that they have gluten sensitivity.

    20. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They found out there was money in the banana stand. So they bought a bigger banana stand.

    21. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by omnichad · · Score: 1
    22. Re: What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This merger is exactly why bidding up the share price on companies that after years and years have yet to turn a consistent profit (Amazon, for instance) is a really bad idea for everyone. They blow through capital like drunken sailors on pet project after pet project, which is bad enough, but they also use the not caring about profits to run out of business other firms that actually employ people and drive the economy.

      Meanwhile, millenia idiots on Slashdot keep saying Amazon and Uber (another never profitable over funded company) are the future. A future of what? Unemployment and no economy?

      Crap like this will end in one of two ways. Amazon will drive out competition and raise prices considerably to become profitable and never stop, like cable companies, or they will fail and there will be literally nobody to take up the slack. Oh, and since millenials only know how to invest in Amazon, Facebook, and Starbucks, they'll destroy an entire generation's wealth in the process. That's how this ends.

    23. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      And all of them are trying to look like someone with no more than $3.50.

    24. Re:What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      had...until they went to WF.

      What matters is the money you keep. Shopping at whole foods is like buying $350 pre distressed bluegenes. Sure some people do it because they don't care about $350, the other 99% are trying desperately to be mistaken for those that don't care about $350.

      What about the people who care about $350 but don't wear blue jeans?

    25. Re: What's the purpose of this acquistion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WALL*E hard it right. It will be Buy n Large or nothing!

  6. Re:Push that drive for $15! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they'll eliminate it to save $15/hr, they'll eliminate it to save $5/hr

    Keep begging your masters. Maybe if you agree to work for $2/hr (and say pretty please with a cherry on top) they'll keep you on.

    Now about those tax cuts...

  7. Sort of .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whole Foods may be pricey...

    Tofu. Their 14oz blocks are $1.99 where my Publix sells them at $2.99 (name brand).

    Some wines are cheaper.

    And I agree - Whole Paycheck for Whole Wheat Pastry flour. No one else in my area sells it.

    BUT - My Publix and Kroger are catching on. And I was at a Food Lion the other day and they had a lot of good stuff too - their tofu was just as cheap.

    The other stores are catching on and Whole Foods' niche is disappearing. And many things I just order from Amazon direct. Although, being near an Amazon distribution center and seeing orders being sat on because shipping at once would mean I get free two day shipping is annoying - like I used to 12 years ago. Yes, they do sit on orders if their algorithms show that you'd get "free" expedited shipping. I have a test case to prove it.

    That's OK. I've figured out other ways to game their silly ass system and I'm keeping it ALL to myself. I'd sell it to Amazon, but they won't pay the the ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS for it.

    Apple might.

    1. Re:Sort of .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Publix' motto is "Where Shopping is a Pleasure."

      They didn't attempt to compete price-wise with Wal-Mart. That's what Winn-Dixie did and W-D got clobbered and bought out. No Publix I've ever been in has had self checkout, and I'm fine with that. Buying groceries is one of the few things I prefer human interaction on.

      On the whole, though, Publix often has prices as good or better than their "discount" competitors for much of what I buy, so it's not just luxury shopping like The Fresh Market.

      On the other hand, if you absolutely must have the Low Price Always[TM] and being treated like cattle doesn't bother you, then by all means, go to the self-checkout stores.

    2. Re:Sort of .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self checkout isn't any faster. Especially with the unending chorus of people flubbing up, machines repeating, "place item in bagging area" until the overworked employee with a key can get over there. Or, if the self-checkout machine decides to just stop and demand a live employee because you bought something like gasoline additive or an oil filter, which some one, somewhere could use for a bong.

    3. Re:Sort of .... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can make a bong out of anything.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Sort of .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When there are only one or two staffed registers, self checkout is a lot faster. More annoying, but faster. I still hate Stop & Shop for disabling the mute buttons because the self checkout babysitters weren't paying attention. And for their chip card readers that start honking at you the instant your card can be removed instead of giving you a second or two to remove your card in silence.

      And for the "place item in bagging area" issue, just press down on the bag rack every time you put something in a bag.

    5. Re:Sort of .... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Self-checkouts are improving rapidly. You might want to try again. Where I get my groceries, self-checkout is always faster. There are 4 self checkouts, usually with no wait, and 1 or 2 staffed checkouts with a few people in line, who I assume are either luddites or are buying booze and cigarettes.

    6. Re:Sort of .... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      It's even worse in my area. The main grocery chain here (Safeway) started charging for grocery bags a few years back. So, not appreciating being nickel-and-dimed to death, most people (inluding myself) now bring reusable cloth bags (Which, to be fair, are also more environmentally friendly and all that... yay.). But it's totally bulloxed up the self-checkouts even more. When they could rely on customers mostly using the free store-provided bags, they could at least rely on the bags all having the same weight and pre-program that into their system. Now the cloth bags are heavier and have more variability in their weight, which gives the scale, thats there to make sure you're ringing up your items before bagging them, no end of issues. So when I start checking out and bagging my stuff, that scale messes up and gives me the "unexpected item in bagging area, please wait for assistance from an associate" error every... goddamned... time. It does it to just about everyone else too. And going to the real cashiers is seldom an option, because the stores are also trying to cheap out on labor and understaffing, making those lines unreasonably long.

      I've taken to making sure I scan something really heavy and non-breakable first and, wenever the self-checkout stops for that weight discrepancy, picking up my bag and slamming it down from a couple feet a few times in mock confusion and not-so-mock frusteration. This usually prompts the employee overseeing the self-checkout to quickly override the scale from their terminal to make it stop the nonsense. Hopefully, I'm also knocking it out of calibration, making the employee more likely to also quickly override it for the next guy and making things easier on everybody, and hopefully costing them at least a little bit more in maintainence.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  8. well in some sates self checkout does not wic /ebt by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    well in some sates self checkout does not take wic / ebt

  9. They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by JoeyRox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Echos are more productive, complain less, and don't show up to work with tattoos

    1. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's wrong with tattoos? Does your food taste different if the cashier had some ink done?

    2. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Echos are more productive, complain less, and don't show up to work with tattoos

      ...yet.

    3. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tattoos are ugly. Yes all of them. But I guess it's no worse than hiring ugly cashiers. It's not like every cashier at whole foods is a hot girl. Although if I were in charge they would be. Obviously robot babe cashiers would be better than human ones though.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    4. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2

      I'm going to guess that at least half of people who shop at grocery stores aren't actually interested in oogling hot girls. Maybe that's why your not in charge of hiring practices.

    5. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am guessing you are the type to refer to every female of the species as "M'lady" while you tip your fedora, sending a dusting of Cheetos crumbs from your neck beard and onto the overarching gut of your morbidly obese body.

    6. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      Nope, my food doesn't taste any different. Then again, you can't taste hepatitis.

    7. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Equal opportunity employment. Throw in some hot guys.

    8. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please stop posting.

    9. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, bitch!

      There is a clear exception for the ugly ones. And it is Doritos, not Cheetos.

    10. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0111 1110 here, preserving karma. I still fuck my mom when I get a chance, usually she's sleeping when I sneak it in her mud whistle. Once she realizes what is happening, she clinches up and then it's bucking bronco time! YEEEHHHHAAAH!

    11. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would obviously do very well because I can't even remember when I last saw a man at a supermarket cash register.

    12. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess... you're a overweight dude, right?

    13. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Lots of managers seem to favor hot girls. Actually I suspect that all heterosexual male humans who hire people choose the beautiful girls first. It's just human nature to favor what is beautiful. Of course I think robots can be beautiful too.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    14. Re:They'll replace cashiers with Echo Dots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yes because I am on Slashdot, but I bet I have a hotter girlfriend than you. Well not really a girlfriend, but almost. Her name is Jia Jia and she is my babe. She say she love me long time.

  10. DRONES by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Eat your broccoli.
    President Bezos's secretary of Agriculture will mandate daily drone delivery of fresh broccoli to every American. Grandmas will be crushed under mountains of uneaten broccoli.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. Alexa tie-in by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

    "Alexa, add Beyond Burgers to my Whole Foods pickup box. Alexa, add Fabainaise Classic 32 ounce to my Whole Foods pickup box. Alexa, add Field Roast Herb Chao slices to my Whole Foods pickup box. Alexa, schedule my Whole Foods pickup for Saturday morning."

    1. Re:Alexa tie-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget chia seed, free range, patchouli, glutan free, organic tampons.

  12. Re:well in some sates self checkout does not wic / by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because of the paperwork that was (maybe still is required) for WIC.

  13. Re: Push that drive for $15! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noo..that's incorrect. WA state minimum wage is $11/hr (outside of Seattle) and prices are being continually raised, raises aren't being given to people making more than minimum, hours are being slashed left and right and guess what? No one in the counties want increased wages, it's only the liberals in bigger cities like Seattle (like as in like-minded). Nearing 7 months later, I've only seen small-medium sized businesses squirm. They can cut my wage back to $9/hr along with every other minimum wage job. $2/hr more at the cost of losing hours. I'm actually losing money bc of this minimum wage increase and I work at a medium-large business

  14. Bezos by clonehappy · · Score: 1

    Exactly the kind of psychopath I want involved in my food supply.

  15. part of the attraction of shopping at Whole Foods by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    is being Seen there, just like some people want to be Seen in church. Amazon might mess with that aspect.

  16. Standard Acquisition process: by netsavior · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is standard process for any acquisition:

    Step 1: Assure all employees of both the acquired and the parent company that their job is safe.
    Step 2: Assure the public that it is business as usual.
    Step 3: https://hardware.slashdot.org/... all your employees in potentially redundant areas fill out "Skill matrix" or other bullshit evaluations
    Step 4: Make a shocking, totally unexpected, totally unpredictable move to lay off redundancies to the point where you can't properly function
    Step 5: Bring in inexpensive contractors/scabs to bring the business back up to minimal function as you ring money out of the asset at peak efficiency.

    1. Re:Standard Acquisition process: by netsavior · · Score: 1

      huh, no idea why that link is there, I blame the totally necessary feature of drag-drop text manipulation on browser text-boxes.

    2. Re:Standard Acquisition process: by omnichad · · Score: 1

      But it does make you wonder why they chose hardware.slashdot.org for this story.

  17. First business, by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 2

    block customer from checking competitors' price online.

  18. I for one welcome our new self-checkout overlords. by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 2

    Please place the item into the bag.

    Please place the item into the bag.

    Please place the item into the bag, YOU HAVE 10 SECONDS TO COMPLY!

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  19. Nana...? Is That You...? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    >>Buying groceries is one of the few things I prefer human interaction on.

    Why? Human interaction on the grocery line?? My grandmother liked human interaction on the grocery line, but she was old and doddering, so we all kind of understood. My daughter was a cashier at a grocery store for one summer. People like you who try to strike up some human interaction scared the daylights out of her. I bought her a pepper spray canister, to keep in her apron. It made her feel safer.

    1. Re:Nana...? Is That You...? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I bought her a pepper spray canister, to keep in her apron. It made her feel safer.

      A part of me looks forward to the day when the cashier, required by management to say "How are you!" (exclamation point, not question mark, they don't care) gets pepper-sprayed by customer who doesn't want human interaction, and then the bag-boy (I'm in the south, we have them, not always boys, not always quite human) has to pepper spray back.

      This would be only slightly more lively than the whole "Happy Holidays" brouhaha, which might involve heavier weapons.

    2. Re:Nana...? Is That You...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try buying her some therapy instead, she's gonna need it.

    3. Re:Nana...? Is That You...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you who try to strike up some human interaction scared the daylights out of her.

      That makes sense. Initiating a conversation without explicit consent is verbal rape.

    4. Re: Nana...? Is That You...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like she was raised by an emo robot.

  20. Re:well in some sates self checkout does not wic / by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it can't check your ID for buying alcohol.
    Nor can it help bag things for the old lady ahead of you.
    Or correct prices that you think are wrong.
    Or berate the people that bring a full cart into the "express" self checkout lane.

    Self checkout is fine if you just ran in to grab milk or something where you don't even get a cart, but it should not be the poster child for replacing actual human employees.

  21. Vote with your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there are no cashiers don't shop there. Problem solved.

  22. Re:Push that drive for $15! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    You can't eliminate a position to save $15/hr unless that position is useless and the person there is a welfare case. You have to replace the technology with less-expensive technology and reduce labor hours that way.

    Let's say the total labor involvement to design, build, maintain, fuel, and operate a machine over its entire lifetime is equivalent to having $9/hr employees provide the replaced business activities. That is to say: the wage time invested, total, across that machine's entire existence, is equivalent to the wages of $9/hr employees producing the same things the machine does. In that case, replacing $15/hr employees with this saves you $6/hr per employee.

    If your employees are $5/hr, it costs more to use the machine.

    As technology improves over time, eventually you have those $9/hr employees making $11/hr, but the machine only costs $10.25/hr. At that point, it's cheaper but not necessarily strategic to replace the employees.

    If you predict the technology will fall in price to $7/hr in the next three years and those machines have a 15-year ROI, you may find it most-profitable to keep your $11/hr employees for a few more years. Then you have $11.70/hr employees (2% per year raise), and a $7/hr machine. Now you start rolling out the machines. You've avoided being locked into a $10.25/hr TCO with only minimal opex.

  23. Because there is no "Pretentious Douche Hipster" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    computer, yet.

  24. Of course they'll be layoffs by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    at the very least their IT staff will get the axe as they merge their network with Amazon's. Accounting & HR will go next for the same reasons. That's just what you do when you merge. You remove redundancies.

    Automation will come later, but it'll come. Probably not the checkout. If you're spending twice as much on groceries you're probably expecting somebody to check you out. Unless they implement some kind of grab and go system (or just close the storefronts entirely in favor of delivery).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  25. So...how will they replace Whole Foods customers by SnarkSide · · Score: 2

    I could sometimes stomach Whole Foods when they were their own entity, but I'm not interested in my grocery dollars going into Amazon's pocket. Even more so, I'll go out of my way to frequent local specialty markets. I imagine many Whole Foods shoppers being turned off by Amazon's involvement. If the demographics shift they will not be able to maintain the current standards.

    I'm a little surprised investors seem to think this is such a great idea. It will be sad if they ruin a good business that a lot of people value.

  26. Re:well in some sates self checkout does not wic / by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    I also find the self checkout useful if you're using multiple payment methods, for example if you're purchasing something for an elderly relative.

  27. Darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. No more charity shaming at Whole Paycheck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woooo!

  29. self check-out makeHarder To Prosecute Shoplifting by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    self check-out makes Harder To Prosecute Shoplifting even more so with some kind of no scan self checkout system.

  30. Re:I for one welcome our new self-checkout overlor by habig · · Score: 1

    Please place the item into the bag.

    at the WF near me, you don't need to use a self checkout machine to get this interaction (minus the Robocop bit). There are signs up saying something about "don't make our employees put things in bags for you to save them from repetitive stress injuries". And the employees give you the evil eye if you don't Comply Immediately With the Sign. So, you get to pay more for your food while getting less service.

  31. Whole Amazon by neoRUR · · Score: 1

    So this will be the Whole of Amazon?

  32. Re:So...how will they replace Whole Foods customer by enjar · · Score: 1

    The CEO of Whole Foods is pretty conservative/libertarian. If you assume Whole Foods customers are tree hugging greenies who have Greenpeace stickers on their Volvos and aspire to join a commune, they don't seem to mind. They might welcome that their market is being bought by the same guy who owns WaPo, which has all those journalists and editors going after Trump. Of course, those local specialty markets have largely been run out of town by Whole Foods or Amazon already. Unless, of course, they were an upmarket grocery chain that was already bought by Whole Foods years ago. Sources: John Mackey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Jeff Bezos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  33. Re:Because there is no "Pretentious Douche Hipster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    computer, yet.

    They're called MacBooks.

  34. Re:part of the attraction of shopping at Whole Foo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If anything you'll be seen more, after Amazon installs more surveillance to datamine shoppers.

    Not to mention the automatic updates of your visits they'll post to your social media after hijacking your in-store internet traffic.

  35. Re:well in some sates self checkout does not wic / by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well in some sates self checkout does not take wic / ebt

    Not really a problem, as few wic/ebt eligible customers go to Whole Paycheck for their asparagus water.

  36. Computs will never replace... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    white kids with dreadlocks.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Computs will never replace... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      They already have computers that will play Sublime 24/7. Just wait until they invent a bong-smoking machine, they'll be out of a job too.

  37. Costco has ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... 100% organic cashiers.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Costco has ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Costco may be the major reason why Whole Foods decided to sell out... Costco has outpaced Whole Foods on the sale of organic foods lately. As far as USDA certified organic foods go, Costco is the "NEW Whole Foods" in many cities.

  38. Re:So...how will they replace Whole Foods customer by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    Mostly, Whole Foods shoppers are worried about things like celiac disease (that they don't have). Also, as many Greenpeace Vegans they have, there are just as many Trumpkin Paleo guys.

  39. What kind of cool stuff could they do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is someone willing to speculate as to what kinds of cool stuff you do with control of both Amazon + Whole Foods?

    1. Re: What kind of cool stuff could they do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, is there some kind of produce you can get via Amazon that a regular grocery store cannot supply?

  40. Re:Because there is no "Pretentious Douche Hipster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they run UNIX.

  41. it's Walmart, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not about what Whole Foods sells, or whether Amazon wants to automate it. It's about Walmart. Amazon is feeling the heat from Walmart, who has gone into online sales and recently doing a decent job of challenging Amazon. Walmart has a million stores that can be used to ship to for free, or to process returns for free. Amazon needs to make Walmart feel some pain. Walmart went into the grocery business a few years back, and is killing older grocery chains. That is a good pressure point to give Walmart some pain. WF was probably the only grocery chain that could be got for "reasonable" cash that didn't seem like just a dump. It's usually easier to start with the boutique end of some business, because the customers are not much sensitive to price.

  42. No plans - right! by woboyle · · Score: 1

    Two weeks before Microsoft closed its takeover of Nokia Mobile Phones where I worked at the time, they assured all the employees that there would be no layoffs and everyone had a secure position. Two weeks after the takeover was complete, they laid off 20,000 of us... Our entire division was decimated and basically shut down. I wonder what happened to the 100 million customers we were serving?

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  43. Re:I for one welcome our new self-checkout overlor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've apparently never heard of Amazon Go.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrmMk1Myrxc

  44. Re:So...how will they replace Whole Foods customer by SnarkSide · · Score: 1

    Valid point, ignorance is bliss.