Slashdot Mirror
European Parliament Committee Endorses End-To-End Encryption (tomshardware.com)
The civil liberties committee of the European Parliament has released a draft proposal "in direct contrast to the increasingly loud voices around the world to introduce regulations or weaken encryption," according to an anonymous Slashdot reader. Tom's Hardware reports:
The draft recommends a regulation that will enforce end-to-end encryption on all communications to protect European Union citizens' fundamental privacy rights. The committee also recommended a ban on backdoors. Article 7 of the E.U.'s Charter of Fundamental Rights says that E.U. citizens have a right to personal privacy, as well as privacy in their family life and at home. According to the EP committee, the privacy of communications between individuals is also an important dimension of this right...
We've lately seen some EU member states push for increased surveillance and even backdoors in encrypted communications, so there seems to be some conflict here between what the European Parliament institutional bodies may want and what some member states do. However, if this proposal for the new Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications passes, it should significantly increase the privacy of E.U. citizens' communications, and it won't be so easy to roll back the changes to add backdoors in the future.
Security researcher Lukasz Olejnik says "the fact that policy is seriously considering these kind of aspects is unprecedented."
We've lately seen some EU member states push for increased surveillance and even backdoors in encrypted communications, so there seems to be some conflict here between what the European Parliament institutional bodies may want and what some member states do. However, if this proposal for the new Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications passes, it should significantly increase the privacy of E.U. citizens' communications, and it won't be so easy to roll back the changes to add backdoors in the future.
Security researcher Lukasz Olejnik says "the fact that policy is seriously considering these kind of aspects is unprecedented."
But... but ... but ... Terrist?
Mrs. May? Could we have your statement on this matter?
What, every court has its jester, and just 'cause she doesn't want to be part of the court anymore doesn't mean we can't laugh about her!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Obviously they didn't think of the children though. My next proposal with be called "Think of the Children" and will require full Internet histories of everyone to be collected and stored in perpetuity.
The tools have been available to the public for decades.
dysfunction starts at the top... cease fire stand down,, there is moms & kids in all of our towns,, sing along.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-HLxpWGCzc
Isn't it amazing how the EU time and time again installs regulation that benefits the people who live there, even if that means going against companies best interests? And still many inhabitants of the EU think they don't benefit from it (although those numbers are going down thanks to Brexit).
-- Cheers!
Seems that while the UK is pushing to become little America and America is spying on everyone + their dog the EU is pressing ahead with bettering the lives of its citizens.
All the weak encryption and spying in the world di not prevent trucks and cars being driven over people or the Boston Marathn bombing. Heck even when they have the intelligence they are hard pressed to do something meaningful about it. - bulk surveillance is not a terrorism preventative measure.
As an aside, a moron called Nigel Farage called the EU "a failed social experiement" - one only needs to look at Nigel's social life to realise what failure is.
gambling we still have permission to listen.. or sing along.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ci271jE82ss .. hanging on to our hemispheres we stand hand in hand,, unseen on tv witnessed by creation..
Yeh, I'm sure everyone in the EU Parliament wants Putin and Trump spying on their private communications. That would be really condusive to democracy.
One very important point: The European Union is not responsible for the security or defence of the people in the European Union. That's a responsibility for the individual countries.
The hardest part of these regulations is balancing out security and privacy, and for the EU it's simple -- they're not responsible for security. So this is largely meaningless.
always fail us... no spirit no heart no life... run tell that..
That's easy to answer: the alternative was Hillary. People rather vote for someone like Trump than for a competent totalitarian like Hillary. Did that answer your question?
Close the N.S.A.'s Back Doors. (New York Times, Sept. 21, 2013)
NSA's own Hardware Backdoors May Still Be a "Problem from Hell". (MIT Technology Review, Oct. 8, 2013)
This 'Demonically Clever' Backdoor Hides In a Tiny Slice of a Computer Chip. (Wired.com, June 1, 2016)
Expert Says NSA Have Backdoors Built Into Intel And AMD Processors. (Eteknix, 2014)
When spyware is detected, that particular vulnerability is fixed:
Red alert! Intel patches remote execution hole that's been hidden in chips since 2010. (The Register, May 1, 2017)
Intel Active Management Technology, Intel Small Business Technology, and Intel Standard Manageability Escalation of Privilege (Intel Corporation, May 5, 2017 ) Quote: "Severity rating: Critical"
Donald lost by 3 million votes. His coming self induced impeachment will be fun queer.
This may sound good on the surface on it, but it may have unintended consequences.
For example, can you still offer unencrypted web sites at all under this regulation? If you can't, doesn't that mean that every web site may have to register with a certificate authority?
Conversely, in order to comply simultaneously with this regulation and hate speech and libel laws, wouldn't web sites have to require more identification and authentication?
And what's the need for such a regulation anyway? All governments need to do is not to refrain from making cryptography illegal. Mandating cryptography seems as much of an unwise overreach as prohibiting it.
Isn't that akin to making burglary illegal?
To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
I don't understand why the summary is saying that the parliament demands end-to-end encryption be "enforced" while the title says "endorsed". This draft bill basically says that when you are not already providing communication over a secure channel, you should protect the users by encryption at their ends, using a sufficiently up-to-date method. Of course this is very vague on the technical requirements (hence enforceability), and I expect a lot resistance from the businesses if this part is going into the final act as it is now.
The real gem, though, is the provision against Member States deliberately weakening security. This is not legislative meddling in tech (which is problematic even if good-intentioned), but a direct legislative safeguard against the crazy state of political atmosphere that is on the verge of cyberauthoritarian dystopia, as it stands now.
Hear hear, honourable members!
You make an interesting point, but the fact that security isn't the primary responsibility of the EU doesn't mean the EU can ignore it in setting rules.
The European Convention on Human Rights is part of EU law, so EU explicitly must protect individual rights. But it goes without saying that it also has to take into account the governments' ability to provide security and law enforcement. This is why law requires specially trained experts, who even so still get things wrong a lot of the time.
Effective governance requires a comprehensive view of all the conflicting duties and goals. You can make rules that simply ignore security, but as soon as people feel threatened they'll simply work around the rules. So you can't effectively protect individual rights by pretending that security just isn't a concern.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
The European Commission must be fighting against those enterprises, governments and peoples that promote hidden backdoors and are considered as a criminal organization
The great problem is that there are hidden backdoors that use encryption for committing criminal acts.
For US Citizens, the gravity of this situation would be translated thusly:
The House subcommittee on Civil Liberties has accepted a proposal written by the ACLU and EFF advocating End-to-End Encryption.
That's it.
It hasn't been submitted to the house as a bill, it isn't making the rounds to garner legislative support, it simply exists as a proposal, and in doing so has made the news.
Isn't the EU there to unify the rules (of which privacy is a part, not that this would pass), to facilitate trade amongst its members? It's more of an interstate commerce commission that suffers from mission creep. Goes with the territory.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
The convention on human rights is a European Council convention. The European Council is a body separate from the European Union. The European Council has more than 40 members, many of which are not EU members.
I do agree that the EU is responsible for many regulations that push for increased protection of citizens' privacy though.
And from those lying though their teeth. Otherwise there would be no need for "loud voices", as convincing arguments would be available. For a ban on secure encryption, no convincing arguments exist, and such a ban would be excessively destructive to a modern economy.
My guess is this committee asked some actual experts, unlike fundamentally stupid and power-hungry people like May, Trump, etc. like to do.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
...because he had hopes of siring his ideal woman. And he already did: Ivanka
We didn't just backdoor all your crypto willy-nilly! NO way citizen, we had a discussion about it, don't you remember? It was you, the citizens, that had decided that this was a good idea, and we've just been enforcing the will of the people. Now, remove that unauthorized encryption, and provide all your private keys immediately. Like in the deal.
You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
Yep, Muslimy Muslim is acting very Muslim.
Starting with Maasrict treaty until it position was little more than advisory. Commission took the power. Now this is a VERY GOOD REASON to leave EU.